Adding upstream version 6.1.76.upstream/6.1.76

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 149 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.h b/fs/btrfs/locking.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..490c7a79e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.h
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2008 Oracle.  All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#ifndef BTRFS_LOCKING_H
+#define BTRFS_LOCKING_H
+
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
+#include <linux/percpu_counter.h>
+#include "extent_io.h"
+
+#define BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK 1
+#define BTRFS_READ_LOCK 2
+
+/*
+ * We are limited in number of subclasses by MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES, which at
+ * the time of this patch is 8, which is how many we use.  Keep this in mind if
+ * you decide you want to add another subclass.
+ */
+enum btrfs_lock_nesting {
+	BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL,
+
+	/*
+	 * When we COW a block we are holding the lock on the original block,
+	 * and since our lockdep maps are rootid+level, this confuses lockdep
+	 * when we lock the newly allocated COW'd block.  Handle this by having
+	 * a subclass for COW'ed blocks so that lockdep doesn't complain.
+	 */
+	BTRFS_NESTING_COW,
+
+	/*
+	 * Oftentimes we need to lock adjacent nodes on the same level while
+	 * still holding the lock on the original node we searched to, such as
+	 * for searching forward or for split/balance.
+	 *
+	 * Because of this we need to indicate to lockdep that this is
+	 * acceptable by having a different subclass for each of these
+	 * operations.
+	 */
+	BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT,
+	BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT,
+
+	/*
+	 * When splitting we will be holding a lock on the left/right node when
+	 * we need to cow that node, thus we need a new set of subclasses for
+	 * these two operations.
+	 */
+	BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT_COW,
+	BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT_COW,
+
+	/*
+	 * When splitting we may push nodes to the left or right, but still use
+	 * the subsequent nodes in our path, keeping our locks on those adjacent
+	 * blocks.  Thus when we go to allocate a new split block we've already
+	 * used up all of our available subclasses, so this subclass exists to
+	 * handle this case where we need to allocate a new split block.
+	 */
+	BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT,
+
+	/*
+	 * When promoting a new block to a root we need to have a special
+	 * subclass so we don't confuse lockdep, as it will appear that we are
+	 * locking a higher level node before a lower level one.  Copying also
+	 * has this problem as it appears we're locking the same block again
+	 * when we make a snapshot of an existing root.
+	 */
+	BTRFS_NESTING_NEW_ROOT,
+
+	/*
+	 * We are limited to MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBLCLASSES number of subclasses, so
+	 * add this in here and add a static_assert to keep us from going over
+	 * the limit.  As of this writing we're limited to 8, and we're
+	 * definitely using 8, hence this check to keep us from messing up in
+	 * the future.
+	 */
+	BTRFS_NESTING_MAX,
+};
+
+static_assert(BTRFS_NESTING_MAX <= MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES,
+	      "too many lock subclasses defined");
+
+struct btrfs_path;
+
+void __btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb, enum btrfs_lock_nesting nest);
+void btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb);
+void btrfs_tree_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb);
+
+void __btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb, enum btrfs_lock_nesting nest);
+void btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb);
+void btrfs_tree_read_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb);
+int btrfs_try_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb);
+int btrfs_try_tree_write_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb);
+struct extent_buffer *btrfs_lock_root_node(struct btrfs_root *root);
+struct extent_buffer *btrfs_read_lock_root_node(struct btrfs_root *root);
+struct extent_buffer *btrfs_try_read_lock_root_node(struct btrfs_root *root);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
+static inline void btrfs_assert_tree_write_locked(struct extent_buffer *eb)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held_write(&eb->lock);
+}
+#else
+static inline void btrfs_assert_tree_write_locked(struct extent_buffer *eb) { }
+#endif
+
+void btrfs_unlock_up_safe(struct btrfs_path *path, int level);
+
+static inline void btrfs_tree_unlock_rw(struct extent_buffer *eb, int rw)
+{
+	if (rw == BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK)
+		btrfs_tree_unlock(eb);
+	else if (rw == BTRFS_READ_LOCK)
+		btrfs_tree_read_unlock(eb);
+	else
+		BUG();
+}
+
+struct btrfs_drew_lock {
+	atomic_t readers;
+	struct percpu_counter writers;
+	wait_queue_head_t pending_writers;
+	wait_queue_head_t pending_readers;
+};
+
+int btrfs_drew_lock_init(struct btrfs_drew_lock *lock);
+void btrfs_drew_lock_destroy(struct btrfs_drew_lock *lock);
+void btrfs_drew_write_lock(struct btrfs_drew_lock *lock);
+bool btrfs_drew_try_write_lock(struct btrfs_drew_lock *lock);
+void btrfs_drew_write_unlock(struct btrfs_drew_lock *lock);
+void btrfs_drew_read_lock(struct btrfs_drew_lock *lock);
+void btrfs_drew_read_unlock(struct btrfs_drew_lock *lock);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+void btrfs_set_buffer_lockdep_class(u64 objectid, struct extent_buffer *eb, int level);
+void btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *eb);
+#else
+static inline void btrfs_set_buffer_lockdep_class(u64 objectid,
+					struct extent_buffer *eb, int level)
+{
+}
+static inline void btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class(struct btrfs_root *root,
+						   struct extent_buffer *eb)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif