diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/filesystems/idmappings.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/filesystems/idmappings.rst | 959 |
1 files changed, 959 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/idmappings.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/idmappings.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b9b31066a --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/idmappings.rst @@ -0,0 +1,959 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +Idmappings +========== + +Most filesystem developers will have encountered idmappings. They are used when +reading from or writing ownership to disk, reporting ownership to userspace, or +for permission checking. This document is aimed at filesystem developers that +want to know how idmappings work. + +Formal notes +------------ + +An idmapping is essentially a translation of a range of ids into another or the +same range of ids. The notational convention for idmappings that is widely used +in userspace is:: + + u:k:r + +``u`` indicates the first element in the upper idmapset ``U`` and ``k`` +indicates the first element in the lower idmapset ``K``. The ``r`` parameter +indicates the range of the idmapping, i.e. how many ids are mapped. From now +on, we will always prefix ids with ``u`` or ``k`` to make it clear whether +we're talking about an id in the upper or lower idmapset. + +To see what this looks like in practice, let's take the following idmapping:: + + u22:k10000:r3 + +and write down the mappings it will generate:: + + u22 -> k10000 + u23 -> k10001 + u24 -> k10002 + +From a mathematical viewpoint ``U`` and ``K`` are well-ordered sets and an +idmapping is an order isomorphism from ``U`` into ``K``. So ``U`` and ``K`` are +order isomorphic. In fact, ``U`` and ``K`` are always well-ordered subsets of +the set of all possible ids useable on a given system. + +Looking at this mathematically briefly will help us highlight some properties +that make it easier to understand how we can translate between idmappings. For +example, we know that the inverse idmapping is an order isomorphism as well:: + + k10000 -> u22 + k10001 -> u23 + k10002 -> u24 + +Given that we are dealing with order isomorphisms plus the fact that we're +dealing with subsets we can embedd idmappings into each other, i.e. we can +sensibly translate between different idmappings. For example, assume we've been +given the three idmappings:: + + 1. u0:k10000:r10000 + 2. u0:k20000:r10000 + 3. u0:k30000:r10000 + +and id ``k11000`` which has been generated by the first idmapping by mapping +``u1000`` from the upper idmapset down to ``k11000`` in the lower idmapset. + +Because we're dealing with order isomorphic subsets it is meaningful to ask +what id ``k11000`` corresponds to in the second or third idmapping. The +straightfoward algorithm to use is to apply the inverse of the first idmapping, +mapping ``k11000`` up to ``u1000``. Afterwards, we can map ``u1000`` down using +either the second idmapping mapping or third idmapping mapping. The second +idmapping would map ``u1000`` down to ``21000``. The third idmapping would map +``u1000`` down to ``u31000``. + +If we were given the same task for the following three idmappings:: + + 1. u0:k10000:r10000 + 2. u0:k20000:r200 + 3. u0:k30000:r300 + +we would fail to translate as the sets aren't order isomorphic over the full +range of the first idmapping anymore (However they are order isomorphic over +the full range of the second idmapping.). Neither the second or third idmapping +contain ``u1000`` in the upper idmapset ``U``. This is equivalent to not having +an id mapped. We can simply say that ``u1000`` is unmapped in the second and +third idmapping. The kernel will report unmapped ids as the overflowuid +``(uid_t)-1`` or overflowgid ``(gid_t)-1`` to userspace. + +The algorithm to calculate what a given id maps to is pretty simple. First, we +need to verify that the range can contain our target id. We will skip this step +for simplicity. After that if we want to know what ``id`` maps to we can do +simple calculations: + +- If we want to map from left to right:: + + u:k:r + id - u + k = n + +- If we want to map from right to left:: + + u:k:r + id - k + u = n + +Instead of "left to right" we can also say "down" and instead of "right to +left" we can also say "up". Obviously mapping down and up invert each other. + +To see whether the simple formulas above work, consider the following two +idmappings:: + + 1. u0:k20000:r10000 + 2. u500:k30000:r10000 + +Assume we are given ``k21000`` in the lower idmapset of the first idmapping. We +want to know what id this was mapped from in the upper idmapset of the first +idmapping. So we're mapping up in the first idmapping:: + + id - k + u = n + k21000 - k20000 + u0 = u1000 + +Now assume we are given the id ``u1100`` in the upper idmapset of the second +idmapping and we want to know what this id maps down to in the lower idmapset +of the second idmapping. This means we're mapping down in the second +idmapping:: + + id - u + k = n + u1100 - u500 + k30000 = k30600 + +General notes +------------- + +In the context of the kernel an idmapping can be interpreted as mapping a range +of userspace ids into a range of kernel ids:: + + userspace-id:kernel-id:range + +A userspace id is always an element in the upper idmapset of an idmapping of +type ``uid_t`` or ``gid_t`` and a kernel id is always an element in the lower +idmapset of an idmapping of type ``kuid_t`` or ``kgid_t``. From now on +"userspace id" will be used to refer to the well known ``uid_t`` and ``gid_t`` +types and "kernel id" will be used to refer to ``kuid_t`` and ``kgid_t``. + +The kernel is mostly concerned with kernel ids. They are used when performing +permission checks and are stored in an inode's ``i_uid`` and ``i_gid`` field. +A userspace id on the other hand is an id that is reported to userspace by the +kernel, or is passed by userspace to the kernel, or a raw device id that is +written or read from disk. + +Note that we are only concerned with idmappings as the kernel stores them not +how userspace would specify them. + +For the rest of this document we will prefix all userspace ids with ``u`` and +all kernel ids with ``k``. Ranges of idmappings will be prefixed with ``r``. So +an idmapping will be written as ``u0:k10000:r10000``. + +For example, the id ``u1000`` is an id in the upper idmapset or "userspace +idmapset" starting with ``u1000``. And it is mapped to ``k11000`` which is a +kernel id in the lower idmapset or "kernel idmapset" starting with ``k10000``. + +A kernel id is always created by an idmapping. Such idmappings are associated +with user namespaces. Since we mainly care about how idmappings work we're not +going to be concerned with how idmappings are created nor how they are used +outside of the filesystem context. This is best left to an explanation of user +namespaces. + +The initial user namespace is special. It always has an idmapping of the +following form:: + + u0:k0:r4294967295 + +which is an identity idmapping over the full range of ids available on this +system. + +Other user namespaces usually have non-identity idmappings such as:: + + u0:k10000:r10000 + +When a process creates or wants to change ownership of a file, or when the +ownership of a file is read from disk by a filesystem, the userspace id is +immediately translated into a kernel id according to the idmapping associated +with the relevant user namespace. + +For instance, consider a file that is stored on disk by a filesystem as being +owned by ``u1000``: + +- If a filesystem were to be mounted in the initial user namespaces (as most + filesystems are) then the initial idmapping will be used. As we saw this is + simply the identity idmapping. This would mean id ``u1000`` read from disk + would be mapped to id ``k1000``. So an inode's ``i_uid`` and ``i_gid`` field + would contain ``k1000``. + +- If a filesystem were to be mounted with an idmapping of ``u0:k10000:r10000`` + then ``u1000`` read from disk would be mapped to ``k11000``. So an inode's + ``i_uid`` and ``i_gid`` would contain ``k11000``. + +Translation algorithms +---------------------- + +We've already seen briefly that it is possible to translate between different +idmappings. We'll now take a closer look how that works. + +Crossmapping +~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +This translation algorithm is used by the kernel in quite a few places. For +example, it is used when reporting back the ownership of a file to userspace +via the ``stat()`` system call family. + +If we've been given ``k11000`` from one idmapping we can map that id up in +another idmapping. In order for this to work both idmappings need to contain +the same kernel id in their kernel idmapsets. For example, consider the +following idmappings:: + + 1. u0:k10000:r10000 + 2. u20000:k10000:r10000 + +and we are mapping ``u1000`` down to ``k11000`` in the first idmapping . We can +then translate ``k11000`` into a userspace id in the second idmapping using the +kernel idmapset of the second idmapping:: + + /* Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the second idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u20000:k10000:r10000, k11000) = u21000 + +Note, how we can get back to the kernel id in the first idmapping by inverting +the algorithm:: + + /* Map the userspace id down into a kernel id in the second idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u20000:k10000:r10000, u21000) = k11000 + + /* Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the first idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, k11000) = u1000 + +This algorithm allows us to answer the question what userspace id a given +kernel id corresponds to in a given idmapping. In order to be able to answer +this question both idmappings need to contain the same kernel id in their +respective kernel idmapsets. + +For example, when the kernel reads a raw userspace id from disk it maps it down +into a kernel id according to the idmapping associated with the filesystem. +Let's assume the filesystem was mounted with an idmapping of +``u0:k20000:r10000`` and it reads a file owned by ``u1000`` from disk. This +means ``u1000`` will be mapped to ``k21000`` which is what will be stored in +the inode's ``i_uid`` and ``i_gid`` field. + +When someone in userspace calls ``stat()`` or a related function to get +ownership information about the file the kernel can't simply map the id back up +according to the filesystem's idmapping as this would give the wrong owner if +the caller is using an idmapping. + +So the kernel will map the id back up in the idmapping of the caller. Let's +assume the caller has the slighly unconventional idmapping +``u3000:k20000:r10000`` then ``k21000`` would map back up to ``u4000``. +Consequently the user would see that this file is owned by ``u4000``. + +Remapping +~~~~~~~~~ + +It is possible to translate a kernel id from one idmapping to another one via +the userspace idmapset of the two idmappings. This is equivalent to remapping +a kernel id. + +Let's look at an example. We are given the following two idmappings:: + + 1. u0:k10000:r10000 + 2. u0:k20000:r10000 + +and we are given ``k11000`` in the first idmapping. In order to translate this +kernel id in the first idmapping into a kernel id in the second idmapping we +need to perform two steps: + +1. Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the first idmapping:: + + /* Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the first idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, k11000) = u1000 + +2. Map the userspace id down into a kernel id in the second idmapping:: + + /* Map the userspace id down into a kernel id in the second idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u0:k20000:r10000, u1000) = k21000 + +As you can see we used the userspace idmapset in both idmappings to translate +the kernel id in one idmapping to a kernel id in another idmapping. + +This allows us to answer the question what kernel id we would need to use to +get the same userspace id in another idmapping. In order to be able to answer +this question both idmappings need to contain the same userspace id in their +respective userspace idmapsets. + +Note, how we can easily get back to the kernel id in the first idmapping by +inverting the algorithm: + +1. Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the second idmapping:: + + /* Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the second idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u0:k20000:r10000, k21000) = u1000 + +2. Map the userspace id down into a kernel id in the first idmapping:: + + /* Map the userspace id down into a kernel id in the first idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, u1000) = k11000 + +Another way to look at this translation is to treat it as inverting one +idmapping and applying another idmapping if both idmappings have the relevant +userspace id mapped. This will come in handy when working with idmapped mounts. + +Invalid translations +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +It is never valid to use an id in the kernel idmapset of one idmapping as the +id in the userspace idmapset of another or the same idmapping. While the kernel +idmapset always indicates an idmapset in the kernel id space the userspace +idmapset indicates a userspace id. So the following translations are forbidden:: + + /* Map the userspace id down into a kernel id in the first idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, u1000) = k11000 + + /* INVALID: Map the kernel id down into a kernel id in the second idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u10000:k20000:r10000, k110000) = k21000 + ~~~~~~~ + +and equally wrong:: + + /* Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the first idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, k11000) = u1000 + + /* INVALID: Map the userspace id up into a userspace id in the second idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u20000:k0:r10000, u1000) = k21000 + ~~~~~ + +Idmappings when creating filesystem objects +------------------------------------------- + +The concepts of mapping an id down or mapping an id up are expressed in the two +kernel functions filesystem developers are rather familiar with and which we've +already used in this document:: + + /* Map the userspace id down into a kernel id. */ + make_kuid(idmapping, uid) + + /* Map the kernel id up into a userspace id. */ + from_kuid(idmapping, kuid) + +We will take an abbreviated look into how idmappings figure into creating +filesystem objects. For simplicity we will only look at what happens when the +VFS has already completed path lookup right before it calls into the filesystem +itself. So we're concerned with what happens when e.g. ``vfs_mkdir()`` is +called. We will also assume that the directory we're creating filesystem +objects in is readable and writable for everyone. + +When creating a filesystem object the caller will look at the caller's +filesystem ids. These are just regular ``uid_t`` and ``gid_t`` userspace ids +but they are exclusively used when determining file ownership which is why they +are called "filesystem ids". They are usually identical to the uid and gid of +the caller but can differ. We will just assume they are always identical to not +get lost in too many details. + +When the caller enters the kernel two things happen: + +1. Map the caller's userspace ids down into kernel ids in the caller's + idmapping. + (To be precise, the kernel will simply look at the kernel ids stashed in the + credentials of the current task but for our education we'll pretend this + translation happens just in time.) +2. Verify that the caller's kernel ids can be mapped up to userspace ids in the + filesystem's idmapping. + +The second step is important as regular filesystem will ultimately need to map +the kernel id back up into a userspace id when writing to disk. +So with the second step the kernel guarantees that a valid userspace id can be +written to disk. If it can't the kernel will refuse the creation request to not +even remotely risk filesystem corruption. + +The astute reader will have realized that this is simply a varation of the +crossmapping algorithm we mentioned above in a previous section. First, the +kernel maps the caller's userspace id down into a kernel id according to the +caller's idmapping and then maps that kernel id up according to the +filesystem's idmapping. + +Let's see some examples with caller/filesystem idmapping but without mount +idmappings. This will exhibit some problems we can hit. After that we will +revisit/reconsider these examples, this time using mount idmappings, to see how +they can solve the problems we observed before. + +Example 1 +~~~~~~~~~ + +:: + + caller id: u1000 + caller idmapping: u0:k0:r4294967295 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k0:r4294967295 + +Both the caller and the filesystem use the identity idmapping: + +1. Map the caller's userspace ids into kernel ids in the caller's idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, u1000) = k1000 + +2. Verify that the caller's kernel ids can be mapped to userspace ids in the + filesystem's idmapping. + + For this second step the kernel will call the function + ``fsuidgid_has_mapping()`` which ultimately boils down to calling + ``from_kuid()``:: + + from_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, k1000) = u1000 + +In this example both idmappings are the same so there's nothing exciting going +on. Ultimately the userspace id that lands on disk will be ``u1000``. + +Example 2 +~~~~~~~~~ + +:: + + caller id: u1000 + caller idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k20000:r10000 + +1. Map the caller's userspace ids down into kernel ids in the caller's + idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, u1000) = k11000 + +2. Verify that the caller's kernel ids can be mapped up to userspace ids in the + filesystem's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k20000:r10000, k11000) = u-1 + +It's immediately clear that while the caller's userspace id could be +successfully mapped down into kernel ids in the caller's idmapping the kernel +ids could not be mapped up according to the filesystem's idmapping. So the +kernel will deny this creation request. + +Note that while this example is less common, because most filesystem can't be +mounted with non-initial idmappings this is a general problem as we can see in +the next examples. + +Example 3 +~~~~~~~~~ + +:: + + caller id: u1000 + caller idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k0:r4294967295 + +1. Map the caller's userspace ids down into kernel ids in the caller's + idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, u1000) = k11000 + +2. Verify that the caller's kernel ids can be mapped up to userspace ids in the + filesystem's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, k11000) = u11000 + +We can see that the translation always succeeds. The userspace id that the +filesystem will ultimately put to disk will always be identical to the value of +the kernel id that was created in the caller's idmapping. This has mainly two +consequences. + +First, that we can't allow a caller to ultimately write to disk with another +userspace id. We could only do this if we were to mount the whole fileystem +with the caller's or another idmapping. But that solution is limited to a few +filesystems and not very flexible. But this is a use-case that is pretty +important in containerized workloads. + +Second, the caller will usually not be able to create any files or access +directories that have stricter permissions because none of the filesystem's +kernel ids map up into valid userspace ids in the caller's idmapping + +1. Map raw userspace ids down to kernel ids in the filesystem's idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, u1000) = k1000 + +2. Map kernel ids up to userspace ids in the caller's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, k1000) = u-1 + +Example 4 +~~~~~~~~~ + +:: + + file id: u1000 + caller idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k0:r4294967295 + +In order to report ownership to userspace the kernel uses the crossmapping +algorithm introduced in a previous section: + +1. Map the userspace id on disk down into a kernel id in the filesystem's + idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, u1000) = k1000 + +2. Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the caller's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, k1000) = u-1 + +The crossmapping algorithm fails in this case because the kernel id in the +filesystem idmapping cannot be mapped up to a userspace id in the caller's +idmapping. Thus, the kernel will report the ownership of this file as the +overflowid. + +Example 5 +~~~~~~~~~ + +:: + + file id: u1000 + caller idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k20000:r10000 + +In order to report ownership to userspace the kernel uses the crossmapping +algorithm introduced in a previous section: + +1. Map the userspace id on disk down into a kernel id in the filesystem's + idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k20000:r10000, u1000) = k21000 + +2. Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the caller's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, k21000) = u-1 + +Again, the crossmapping algorithm fails in this case because the kernel id in +the filesystem idmapping cannot be mapped to a userspace id in the caller's +idmapping. Thus, the kernel will report the ownership of this file as the +overflowid. + +Note how in the last two examples things would be simple if the caller would be +using the initial idmapping. For a filesystem mounted with the initial +idmapping it would be trivial. So we only consider a filesystem with an +idmapping of ``u0:k20000:r10000``: + +1. Map the userspace id on disk down into a kernel id in the filesystem's + idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k20000:r10000, u1000) = k21000 + +2. Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the caller's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, k21000) = u21000 + +Idmappings on idmapped mounts +----------------------------- + +The examples we've seen in the previous section where the caller's idmapping +and the filesystem's idmapping are incompatible causes various issues for +workloads. For a more complex but common example, consider two containers +started on the host. To completely prevent the two containers from affecting +each other, an administrator may often use different non-overlapping idmappings +for the two containers:: + + container1 idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + container2 idmapping: u0:k20000:r10000 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k30000:r10000 + +An administrator wanting to provide easy read-write access to the following set +of files:: + + dir id: u0 + dir/file1 id: u1000 + dir/file2 id: u2000 + +to both containers currently can't. + +Of course the administrator has the option to recursively change ownership via +``chown()``. For example, they could change ownership so that ``dir`` and all +files below it can be crossmapped from the filesystem's into the container's +idmapping. Let's assume they change ownership so it is compatible with the +first container's idmapping:: + + dir id: u10000 + dir/file1 id: u11000 + dir/file2 id: u12000 + +This would still leave ``dir`` rather useless to the second container. In fact, +``dir`` and all files below it would continue to appear owned by the overflowid +for the second container. + +Or consider another increasingly popular example. Some service managers such as +systemd implement a concept called "portable home directories". A user may want +to use their home directories on different machines where they are assigned +different login userspace ids. Most users will have ``u1000`` as the login id +on their machine at home and all files in their home directory will usually be +owned by ``u1000``. At uni or at work they may have another login id such as +``u1125``. This makes it rather difficult to interact with their home directory +on their work machine. + +In both cases changing ownership recursively has grave implications. The most +obvious one is that ownership is changed globally and permanently. In the home +directory case this change in ownership would even need to happen everytime the +user switches from their home to their work machine. For really large sets of +files this becomes increasingly costly. + +If the user is lucky, they are dealing with a filesystem that is mountable +inside user namespaces. But this would also change ownership globally and the +change in ownership is tied to the lifetime of the filesystem mount, i.e. the +superblock. The only way to change ownership is to completely unmount the +filesystem and mount it again in another user namespace. This is usually +impossible because it would mean that all users currently accessing the +filesystem can't anymore. And it means that ``dir`` still can't be shared +between two containers with different idmappings. +But usually the user doesn't even have this option since most filesystems +aren't mountable inside containers. And not having them mountable might be +desirable as it doesn't require the filesystem to deal with malicious +filesystem images. + +But the usecases mentioned above and more can be handled by idmapped mounts. +They allow to expose the same set of dentries with different ownership at +different mounts. This is achieved by marking the mounts with a user namespace +through the ``mount_setattr()`` system call. The idmapping associated with it +is then used to translate from the caller's idmapping to the filesystem's +idmapping and vica versa using the remapping algorithm we introduced above. + +Idmapped mounts make it possible to change ownership in a temporary and +localized way. The ownership changes are restricted to a specific mount and the +ownership changes are tied to the lifetime of the mount. All other users and +locations where the filesystem is exposed are unaffected. + +Filesystems that support idmapped mounts don't have any real reason to support +being mountable inside user namespaces. A filesystem could be exposed +completely under an idmapped mount to get the same effect. This has the +advantage that filesystems can leave the creation of the superblock to +privileged users in the initial user namespace. + +However, it is perfectly possible to combine idmapped mounts with filesystems +mountable inside user namespaces. We will touch on this further below. + +Remapping helpers +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Idmapping functions were added that translate between idmappings. They make use +of the remapping algorithm we've introduced earlier. We're going to look at +two: + +- ``i_uid_into_mnt()`` and ``i_gid_into_mnt()`` + + The ``i_*id_into_mnt()`` functions translate filesystem's kernel ids into + kernel ids in the mount's idmapping:: + + /* Map the filesystem's kernel id up into a userspace id in the filesystem's idmapping. */ + from_kuid(filesystem, kid) = uid + + /* Map the filesystem's userspace id down ito a kernel id in the mount's idmapping. */ + make_kuid(mount, uid) = kuid + +- ``mapped_fsuid()`` and ``mapped_fsgid()`` + + The ``mapped_fs*id()`` functions translate the caller's kernel ids into + kernel ids in the filesystem's idmapping. This translation is achieved by + remapping the caller's kernel ids using the mount's idmapping:: + + /* Map the caller's kernel id up into a userspace id in the mount's idmapping. */ + from_kuid(mount, kid) = uid + + /* Map the mount's userspace id down into a kernel id in the filesystem's idmapping. */ + make_kuid(filesystem, uid) = kuid + +Note that these two functions invert each other. Consider the following +idmappings:: + + caller idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k20000:r10000 + mount idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + +Assume a file owned by ``u1000`` is read from disk. The filesystem maps this id +to ``k21000`` according to its idmapping. This is what is stored in the +inode's ``i_uid`` and ``i_gid`` fields. + +When the caller queries the ownership of this file via ``stat()`` the kernel +would usually simply use the crossmapping algorithm and map the filesystem's +kernel id up to a userspace id in the caller's idmapping. + +But when the caller is accessing the file on an idmapped mount the kernel will +first call ``i_uid_into_mnt()`` thereby translating the filesystem's kernel id +into a kernel id in the mount's idmapping:: + + i_uid_into_mnt(k21000): + /* Map the filesystem's kernel id up into a userspace id. */ + from_kuid(u0:k20000:r10000, k21000) = u1000 + + /* Map the filesystem's userspace id down ito a kernel id in the mount's idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, u1000) = k11000 + +Finally, when the kernel reports the owner to the caller it will turn the +kernel id in the mount's idmapping into a userspace id in the caller's +idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, k11000) = u1000 + +We can test whether this algorithm really works by verifying what happens when +we create a new file. Let's say the user is creating a file with ``u1000``. + +The kernel maps this to ``k11000`` in the caller's idmapping. Usually the +kernel would now apply the crossmapping, verifying that ``k11000`` can be +mapped to a userspace id in the filesystem's idmapping. Since ``k11000`` can't +be mapped up in the filesystem's idmapping directly this creation request +fails. + +But when the caller is accessing the file on an idmapped mount the kernel will +first call ``mapped_fs*id()`` thereby translating the caller's kernel id into +a kernel id according to the mount's idmapping:: + + mapped_fsuid(k11000): + /* Map the caller's kernel id up into a userspace id in the mount's idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, k11000) = u1000 + + /* Map the mount's userspace id down into a kernel id in the filesystem's idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u0:k20000:r10000, u1000) = k21000 + +When finally writing to disk the kernel will then map ``k21000`` up into a +userspace id in the filesystem's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k20000:r10000, k21000) = u1000 + +As we can see, we end up with an invertible and therefore information +preserving algorithm. A file created from ``u1000`` on an idmapped mount will +also be reported as being owned by ``u1000`` and vica versa. + +Let's now briefly reconsider the failing examples from earlier in the context +of idmapped mounts. + +Example 2 reconsidered +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +:: + + caller id: u1000 + caller idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k20000:r10000 + mount idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + +When the caller is using a non-initial idmapping the common case is to attach +the same idmapping to the mount. We now perform three steps: + +1. Map the caller's userspace ids into kernel ids in the caller's idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, u1000) = k11000 + +2. Translate the caller's kernel id into a kernel id in the filesystem's + idmapping:: + + mapped_fsuid(k11000): + /* Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the mount's idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, k11000) = u1000 + + /* Map the userspace id down into a kernel id in the filesystem's idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u0:k20000:r10000, u1000) = k21000 + +2. Verify that the caller's kernel ids can be mapped to userspace ids in the + filesystem's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k20000:r10000, k21000) = u1000 + +So the ownership that lands on disk will be ``u1000``. + +Example 3 reconsidered +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +:: + + caller id: u1000 + caller idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k0:r4294967295 + mount idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + +The same translation algorithm works with the third example. + +1. Map the caller's userspace ids into kernel ids in the caller's idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, u1000) = k11000 + +2. Translate the caller's kernel id into a kernel id in the filesystem's + idmapping:: + + mapped_fsuid(k11000): + /* Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the mount's idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, k11000) = u1000 + + /* Map the userspace id down into a kernel id in the filesystem's idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, u1000) = k1000 + +2. Verify that the caller's kernel ids can be mapped to userspace ids in the + filesystem's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, k21000) = u1000 + +So the ownership that lands on disk will be ``u1000``. + +Example 4 reconsidered +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +:: + + file id: u1000 + caller idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k0:r4294967295 + mount idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + +In order to report ownership to userspace the kernel now does three steps using +the translation algorithm we introduced earlier: + +1. Map the userspace id on disk down into a kernel id in the filesystem's + idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, u1000) = k1000 + +2. Translate the kernel id into a kernel id in the mount's idmapping:: + + i_uid_into_mnt(k1000): + /* Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the filesystem's idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, k1000) = u1000 + + /* Map the userspace id down into a kernel id in the mounts's idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, u1000) = k11000 + +3. Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the caller's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, k11000) = u1000 + +Earlier, the caller's kernel id couldn't be crossmapped in the filesystems's +idmapping. With the idmapped mount in place it now can be crossmapped into the +filesystem's idmapping via the mount's idmapping. The file will now be created +with ``u1000`` according to the mount's idmapping. + +Example 5 reconsidered +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +:: + + file id: u1000 + caller idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k20000:r10000 + mount idmapping: u0:k10000:r10000 + +Again, in order to report ownership to userspace the kernel now does three +steps using the translation algorithm we introduced earlier: + +1. Map the userspace id on disk down into a kernel id in the filesystem's + idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k20000:r10000, u1000) = k21000 + +2. Translate the kernel id into a kernel id in the mount's idmapping:: + + i_uid_into_mnt(k21000): + /* Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the filesystem's idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u0:k20000:r10000, k21000) = u1000 + + /* Map the userspace id down into a kernel id in the mounts's idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, u1000) = k11000 + +3. Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the caller's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k10000:r10000, k11000) = u1000 + +Earlier, the file's kernel id couldn't be crossmapped in the filesystems's +idmapping. With the idmapped mount in place it now can be crossmapped into the +filesystem's idmapping via the mount's idmapping. The file is now owned by +``u1000`` according to the mount's idmapping. + +Changing ownership on a home directory +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +We've seen above how idmapped mounts can be used to translate between +idmappings when either the caller, the filesystem or both uses a non-initial +idmapping. A wide range of usecases exist when the caller is using +a non-initial idmapping. This mostly happens in the context of containerized +workloads. The consequence is as we have seen that for both, filesystem's +mounted with the initial idmapping and filesystems mounted with non-initial +idmappings, access to the filesystem isn't working because the kernel ids can't +be crossmapped between the caller's and the filesystem's idmapping. + +As we've seen above idmapped mounts provide a solution to this by remapping the +caller's or filesystem's idmapping according to the mount's idmapping. + +Aside from containerized workloads, idmapped mounts have the advantage that +they also work when both the caller and the filesystem use the initial +idmapping which means users on the host can change the ownership of directories +and files on a per-mount basis. + +Consider our previous example where a user has their home directory on portable +storage. At home they have id ``u1000`` and all files in their home directory +are owned by ``u1000`` whereas at uni or work they have login id ``u1125``. + +Taking their home directory with them becomes problematic. They can't easily +access their files, they might not be able to write to disk without applying +lax permissions or ACLs and even if they can, they will end up with an annoying +mix of files and directories owned by ``u1000`` and ``u1125``. + +Idmapped mounts allow to solve this problem. A user can create an idmapped +mount for their home directory on their work computer or their computer at home +depending on what ownership they would prefer to end up on the portable storage +itself. + +Let's assume they want all files on disk to belong to ``u1000``. When the user +plugs in their portable storage at their work station they can setup a job that +creates an idmapped mount with the minimal idmapping ``u1000:k1125:r1``. So now +when they create a file the kernel performs the following steps we already know +from above::: + + caller id: u1125 + caller idmapping: u0:k0:r4294967295 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k0:r4294967295 + mount idmapping: u1000:k1125:r1 + +1. Map the caller's userspace ids into kernel ids in the caller's idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, u1125) = k1125 + +2. Translate the caller's kernel id into a kernel id in the filesystem's + idmapping:: + + mapped_fsuid(k1125): + /* Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the mount's idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u1000:k1125:r1, k1125) = u1000 + + /* Map the userspace id down into a kernel id in the filesystem's idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, u1000) = k1000 + +2. Verify that the caller's kernel ids can be mapped to userspace ids in the + filesystem's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, k1000) = u1000 + +So ultimately the file will be created with ``u1000`` on disk. + +Now let's briefly look at what ownership the caller with id ``u1125`` will see +on their work computer: + +:: + + file id: u1000 + caller idmapping: u0:k0:r4294967295 + filesystem idmapping: u0:k0:r4294967295 + mount idmapping: u1000:k1125:r1 + +1. Map the userspace id on disk down into a kernel id in the filesystem's + idmapping:: + + make_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, u1000) = k1000 + +2. Translate the kernel id into a kernel id in the mount's idmapping:: + + i_uid_into_mnt(k1000): + /* Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the filesystem's idmapping. */ + from_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, k1000) = u1000 + + /* Map the userspace id down into a kernel id in the mounts's idmapping. */ + make_kuid(u1000:k1125:r1, u1000) = k1125 + +3. Map the kernel id up into a userspace id in the caller's idmapping:: + + from_kuid(u0:k0:r4294967295, k1125) = u1125 + +So ultimately the caller will be reported that the file belongs to ``u1125`` +which is the caller's userspace id on their workstation in our example. + +The raw userspace id that is put on disk is ``u1000`` so when the user takes +their home directory back to their home computer where they are assigned +``u1000`` using the initial idmapping and mount the filesystem with the initial +idmapping they will see all those files owned by ``u1000``. |