diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/x86/microcode.rst | 240 |
1 files changed, 240 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/microcode.rst b/Documentation/x86/microcode.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b627c6f36 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/x86/microcode.rst @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +========================== +The Linux Microcode Loader +========================== + +:Authors: - Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> + - Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> + - Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> + +The kernel has a x86 microcode loading facility which is supposed to +provide microcode loading methods in the OS. Potential use cases are +updating the microcode on platforms beyond the OEM End-Of-Life support, +and updating the microcode on long-running systems without rebooting. + +The loader supports three loading methods: + +Early load microcode +==================== + +The kernel can update microcode very early during boot. Loading +microcode early can fix CPU issues before they are observed during +kernel boot time. + +The microcode is stored in an initrd file. During boot, it is read from +it and loaded into the CPU cores. + +The format of the combined initrd image is microcode in (uncompressed) +cpio format followed by the (possibly compressed) initrd image. The +loader parses the combined initrd image during boot. + +The microcode files in cpio name space are: + +on Intel: + kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin +on AMD : + kernel/x86/microcode/AuthenticAMD.bin + +During BSP (BootStrapping Processor) boot (pre-SMP), the kernel +scans the microcode file in the initrd. If microcode matching the +CPU is found, it will be applied in the BSP and later on in all APs +(Application Processors). + +The loader also saves the matching microcode for the CPU in memory. +Thus, the cached microcode patch is applied when CPUs resume from a +sleep state. + +Here's a crude example how to prepare an initrd with microcode (this is +normally done automatically by the distribution, when recreating the +initrd, so you don't really have to do it yourself. It is documented +here for future reference only). +:: + + #!/bin/bash + + if [ -z "$1" ]; then + echo "You need to supply an initrd file" + exit 1 + fi + + INITRD="$1" + + DSTDIR=kernel/x86/microcode + TMPDIR=/tmp/initrd + + rm -rf $TMPDIR + + mkdir $TMPDIR + cd $TMPDIR + mkdir -p $DSTDIR + + if [ -d /lib/firmware/amd-ucode ]; then + cat /lib/firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd*.bin > $DSTDIR/AuthenticAMD.bin + fi + + if [ -d /lib/firmware/intel-ucode ]; then + cat /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/* > $DSTDIR/GenuineIntel.bin + fi + + find . | cpio -o -H newc >../ucode.cpio + cd .. + mv $INITRD $INITRD.orig + cat ucode.cpio $INITRD.orig > $INITRD + + rm -rf $TMPDIR + + +The system needs to have the microcode packages installed into +/lib/firmware or you need to fixup the paths above if yours are +somewhere else and/or you've downloaded them directly from the processor +vendor's site. + +Late loading +============ + +You simply install the microcode packages your distro supplies and +run:: + + # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload + +as root. + +The loading mechanism looks for microcode blobs in +/lib/firmware/{intel-ucode,amd-ucode}. The default distro installation +packages already put them there. + +Since kernel 5.19, late loading is not enabled by default. + +The /dev/cpu/microcode method has been removed in 5.19. + +Why is late loading dangerous? +============================== + +Synchronizing all CPUs +---------------------- + +The microcode engine which receives the microcode update is shared +between the two logical threads in a SMT system. Therefore, when +the update is executed on one SMT thread of the core, the sibling +"automatically" gets the update. + +Since the microcode can "simulate" MSRs too, while the microcode update +is in progress, those simulated MSRs transiently cease to exist. This +can result in unpredictable results if the SMT sibling thread happens to +be in the middle of an access to such an MSR. The usual observation is +that such MSR accesses cause #GPs to be raised to signal that former are +not present. + +The disappearing MSRs are just one common issue which is being observed. +Any other instruction that's being patched and gets concurrently +executed by the other SMT sibling, can also result in similar, +unpredictable behavior. + +To eliminate this case, a stop_machine()-based CPU synchronization was +introduced as a way to guarantee that all logical CPUs will not execute +any code but just wait in a spin loop, polling an atomic variable. + +While this took care of device or external interrupts, IPIs including +LVT ones, such as CMCI etc, it cannot address other special interrupts +that can't be shut off. Those are Machine Check (#MC), System Management +(#SMI) and Non-Maskable interrupts (#NMI). + +Machine Checks +-------------- + +Machine Checks (#MC) are non-maskable. There are two kinds of MCEs. +Fatal un-recoverable MCEs and recoverable MCEs. While un-recoverable +errors are fatal, recoverable errors can also happen in kernel context +are also treated as fatal by the kernel. + +On certain Intel machines, MCEs are also broadcast to all threads in a +system. If one thread is in the middle of executing WRMSR, a MCE will be +taken at the end of the flow. Either way, they will wait for the thread +performing the wrmsr(0x79) to rendezvous in the MCE handler and shutdown +eventually if any of the threads in the system fail to check in to the +MCE rendezvous. + +To be paranoid and get predictable behavior, the OS can choose to set +MCG_STATUS.MCIP. Since MCEs can be at most one in a system, if an +MCE was signaled, the above condition will promote to a system reset +automatically. OS can turn off MCIP at the end of the update for that +core. + +System Management Interrupt +--------------------------- + +SMIs are also broadcast to all CPUs in the platform. Microcode update +requests exclusive access to the core before writing to MSR 0x79. So if +it does happen such that, one thread is in WRMSR flow, and the 2nd got +an SMI, that thread will be stopped in the first instruction in the SMI +handler. + +Since the secondary thread is stopped in the first instruction in SMI, +there is very little chance that it would be in the middle of executing +an instruction being patched. Plus OS has no way to stop SMIs from +happening. + +Non-Maskable Interrupts +----------------------- + +When thread0 of a core is doing the microcode update, if thread1 is +pulled into NMI, that can cause unpredictable behavior due to the +reasons above. + +OS can choose a variety of methods to avoid running into this situation. + + +Is the microcode suitable for late loading? +------------------------------------------- + +Late loading is done when the system is fully operational and running +real workloads. Late loading behavior depends on what the base patch on +the CPU is before upgrading to the new patch. + +This is true for Intel CPUs. + +Consider, for example, a CPU has patch level 1 and the update is to +patch level 3. + +Between patch1 and patch3, patch2 might have deprecated a software-visible +feature. + +This is unacceptable if software is even potentially using that feature. +For instance, say MSR_X is no longer available after an update, +accessing that MSR will cause a #GP fault. + +Basically there is no way to declare a new microcode update suitable +for late-loading. This is another one of the problems that caused late +loading to be not enabled by default. + +Builtin microcode +================= + +The loader supports also loading of a builtin microcode supplied through +the regular builtin firmware method CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE. Only 64-bit is +currently supported. + +Here's an example:: + + CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE="intel-ucode/06-3a-09 amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin" + CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE_DIR="/lib/firmware" + +This basically means, you have the following tree structure locally:: + + /lib/firmware/ + |-- amd-ucode + ... + | |-- microcode_amd_fam15h.bin + ... + |-- intel-ucode + ... + | |-- 06-3a-09 + ... + +so that the build system can find those files and integrate them into +the final kernel image. The early loader finds them and applies them. + +Needless to say, this method is not the most flexible one because it +requires rebuilding the kernel each time updated microcode from the CPU +vendor is available. |