From 01997497f915e8f79871f3f2acb55ac465051d24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 20:49:59 +0200 Subject: Adding debian version 6.1.76-1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- ...der-task_struct-saved_state-in-wait_task_.patch | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 152 insertions(+) create mode 100644 debian/patches-rt/0003-sched-Consider-task_struct-saved_state-in-wait_task_.patch (limited to 'debian/patches-rt/0003-sched-Consider-task_struct-saved_state-in-wait_task_.patch') diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/0003-sched-Consider-task_struct-saved_state-in-wait_task_.patch b/debian/patches-rt/0003-sched-Consider-task_struct-saved_state-in-wait_task_.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..933385ab9 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches-rt/0003-sched-Consider-task_struct-saved_state-in-wait_task_.patch @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@ +From e4742fc784660e012dc23090a72614bf1f9a0ca1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior +Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:27:05 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH 03/62] sched: Consider task_struct::saved_state in + wait_task_inactive(). +Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/6.1/older/patches-6.1.69-rt21.tar.xz + +Ptrace is using wait_task_inactive() to wait for the tracee to reach a +certain task state. On PREEMPT_RT that state may be stored in +task_struct::saved_state while the tracee blocks on a sleeping lock and +task_struct::__state is set to TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT. +It is not possible to check only for TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT to be sure that the task +is blocked on a sleeping lock because during wake up (after the sleeping lock +has been acquired) the task state is set TASK_RUNNING. After the task in on CPU +and acquired the pi_lock it will reset the state accordingly but until then +TASK_RUNNING will be observed (with the desired state saved in saved_state). + +Check also for task_struct::saved_state if the desired match was not found in +task_struct::__state on PREEMPT_RT. If the state was found in saved_state, wait +until the task is idle and state is visible in task_struct::__state. + +Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior +Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider +Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Yt%2FpQAFQ1xKNK0RY@linutronix.de +--- + kernel/sched/core.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- + 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c +index 18a4f8f28a25..6bd06122850a 100644 +--- a/kernel/sched/core.c ++++ b/kernel/sched/core.c +@@ -3281,6 +3281,76 @@ int migrate_swap(struct task_struct *cur, struct task_struct *p, + } + #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */ + ++#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT ++ ++/* ++ * Consider: ++ * ++ * set_special_state(X); ++ * ++ * do_things() ++ * // Somewhere in there is an rtlock that can be contended: ++ * current_save_and_set_rtlock_wait_state(); ++ * [...] ++ * schedule_rtlock(); (A) ++ * [...] ++ * current_restore_rtlock_saved_state(); ++ * ++ * schedule(); (B) ++ * ++ * If p->saved_state is anything else than TASK_RUNNING, then p blocked on an ++ * rtlock (A) *before* voluntarily calling into schedule() (B) after setting its ++ * state to X. For things like ptrace (X=TASK_TRACED), the task could have more ++ * work to do upon acquiring the lock in do_things() before whoever called ++ * wait_task_inactive() should return. IOW, we have to wait for: ++ * ++ * p.saved_state = TASK_RUNNING ++ * p.__state = X ++ * ++ * which implies the task isn't blocked on an RT lock and got to schedule() (B). ++ * ++ * Also see comments in ttwu_state_match(). ++ */ ++ ++static __always_inline bool state_mismatch(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state) ++{ ++ unsigned long flags; ++ bool mismatch; ++ ++ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); ++ if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) & match_state) ++ mismatch = false; ++ else if (READ_ONCE(p->saved_state) & match_state) ++ mismatch = false; ++ else ++ mismatch = true; ++ ++ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); ++ return mismatch; ++} ++static __always_inline bool state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state, ++ bool *wait) ++{ ++ if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) & match_state) ++ return true; ++ if (READ_ONCE(p->saved_state) & match_state) { ++ *wait = true; ++ return true; ++ } ++ return false; ++} ++#else ++static __always_inline bool state_mismatch(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state) ++{ ++ return !(READ_ONCE(p->__state) & match_state); ++} ++static __always_inline bool state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state, ++ bool *wait) ++{ ++ return (READ_ONCE(p->__state) & match_state); ++} ++#endif ++ + /* + * wait_task_inactive - wait for a thread to unschedule. + * +@@ -3299,7 +3369,7 @@ int migrate_swap(struct task_struct *cur, struct task_struct *p, + */ + unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state) + { +- int running, queued; ++ bool running, wait; + struct rq_flags rf; + unsigned long ncsw; + struct rq *rq; +@@ -3325,7 +3395,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state + * is actually now running somewhere else! + */ + while (task_on_cpu(rq, p)) { +- if (!(READ_ONCE(p->__state) & match_state)) ++ if (state_mismatch(p, match_state)) + return 0; + cpu_relax(); + } +@@ -3338,9 +3408,10 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state + rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf); + trace_sched_wait_task(p); + running = task_on_cpu(rq, p); +- queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); ++ wait = task_on_rq_queued(p); + ncsw = 0; +- if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) & match_state) ++ ++ if (state_match(p, match_state, &wait)) + ncsw = p->nvcsw | LONG_MIN; /* sets MSB */ + task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); + +@@ -3370,7 +3441,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state + * running right now), it's preempted, and we should + * yield - it could be a while. + */ +- if (unlikely(queued)) { ++ if (unlikely(wait)) { + ktime_t to = NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ; + + set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); +-- +2.43.0 + -- cgit v1.2.3