1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
|
# pthread_rwlock_rdlock.m4 serial 2
dnl Copyright (C) 2017-2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
dnl This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation
dnl gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
dnl with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
dnl From Bruno Haible.
dnl Inspired by
dnl https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_rwlock_rdlock/2-2.c
dnl by Intel Corporation.
dnl Test whether in a situation where
dnl - an rwlock is taken by a reader and has a writer waiting,
dnl - an additional reader requests the lock,
dnl - the waiting writer and the requesting reader threads have the same
dnl priority,
dnl the requesting reader thread gets blocked, so that at some point the
dnl waiting writer can acquire the lock.
dnl Without such a guarantee, when there a N readers and each of the readers
dnl spends more than 1/Nth of the time with the lock held, there is a high
dnl probability that the waiting writer will not get the lock in a given finite
dnl time, a phenomenon called "writer starvation".
dnl Without such a guarantee, applications have a hard time avoiding writer
dnl starvation.
dnl
dnl POSIX:2017 makes this requirement only for implementations that support TPS
dnl (Thread Priority Scheduling) and only for the scheduling policies SCHED_FIFO
dnl and SCHED_RR, see
dnl http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/pthread_rwlock_rdlock.html
dnl but this test verifies the guarantee regardless of TPS and regardless of
dnl scheduling policy.
dnl Glibc currently does not provide this guarantee, see
dnl https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13701
AC_DEFUN([gl_PTHREAD_RWLOCK_RDLOCK_PREFER_WRITER],
[
AC_REQUIRE([gl_THREADLIB_EARLY])
AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether pthread_rwlock_rdlock prefers a writer to a reader],
[gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer],
[save_LIBS="$LIBS"
LIBS="$LIBS $LIBMULTITHREAD"
AC_RUN_IFELSE(
[AC_LANG_SOURCE([[
#include <errno.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define SUCCEED() exit (0)
#define FAILURE() exit (1)
#define UNEXPECTED(n) (exit (10 + (n)))
/* The main thread creates the waiting writer and the requesting reader threads
in the default way; this guarantees that they have the same priority.
We can reuse the main thread as first reader thread. */
static pthread_rwlock_t lock;
static pthread_t reader1;
static pthread_t writer;
static pthread_t reader2;
static pthread_t timer;
/* Used to pass control from writer to reader2 and from reader2 to timer,
as in a relay race.
Passing control from one running thread to another running thread
is most likely faster than to create the second thread. */
static pthread_mutex_t baton;
static void *
timer_func (void *ignored)
{
/* Step 13 (can be before or after step 12):
The timer thread takes the baton, then waits a moment to make sure
it can tell whether the second reader thread is blocked at step 12. */
if (pthread_mutex_lock (&baton))
UNEXPECTED (13);
usleep (100000);
/* By the time we get here, it's clear that the second reader thread is
blocked at step 12. This is the desired behaviour. */
SUCCEED ();
}
static void *
reader2_func (void *ignored)
{
int err;
/* Step 8 (can be before or after step 7):
The second reader thread takes the baton, then waits a moment to make sure
the writer thread has reached step 7. */
if (pthread_mutex_lock (&baton))
UNEXPECTED (8);
usleep (100000);
/* Step 9: The second reader thread requests the lock. */
err = pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock (&lock);
if (err == 0)
FAILURE ();
else if (err != EBUSY)
UNEXPECTED (9);
/* Step 10: Launch a timer, to test whether the next call blocks. */
if (pthread_create (&timer, NULL, timer_func, NULL))
UNEXPECTED (10);
/* Step 11: Release the baton. */
if (pthread_mutex_unlock (&baton))
UNEXPECTED (11);
/* Step 12: The second reader thread requests the lock. */
err = pthread_rwlock_rdlock (&lock);
if (err == 0)
FAILURE ();
else
UNEXPECTED (12);
}
static void *
writer_func (void *ignored)
{
/* Step 4: Take the baton, so that the second reader thread does not go ahead
too early. */
if (pthread_mutex_lock (&baton))
UNEXPECTED (4);
/* Step 5: Create the second reader thread. */
if (pthread_create (&reader2, NULL, reader2_func, NULL))
UNEXPECTED (5);
/* Step 6: Release the baton. */
if (pthread_mutex_unlock (&baton))
UNEXPECTED (6);
/* Step 7: The writer thread requests the lock. */
if (pthread_rwlock_wrlock (&lock))
UNEXPECTED (7);
return NULL;
}
int
main ()
{
reader1 = pthread_self ();
/* Step 1: The main thread initializes the lock and the baton. */
if (pthread_rwlock_init (&lock, NULL))
UNEXPECTED (1);
if (pthread_mutex_init (&baton, NULL))
UNEXPECTED (1);
/* Step 2: The main thread acquires the lock as a reader. */
if (pthread_rwlock_rdlock (&lock))
UNEXPECTED (2);
/* Step 3: Create the writer thread. */
if (pthread_create (&writer, NULL, writer_func, NULL))
UNEXPECTED (3);
/* Job done. Go to sleep. */
for (;;)
{
sleep (1);
}
}
]])],
[gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer=yes],
[gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer=no],
[gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer="guessing yes"])
LIBS="$save_LIBS"
])
case "$gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer" in
*yes)
AC_DEFINE([HAVE_PTHREAD_RWLOCK_RDLOCK_PREFER_WRITER], [1],
[Define if the 'pthread_rwlock_rdlock' function prefers a writer to a reader.])
;;
esac
])
|
