diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 18:45:59 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 18:45:59 +0000 |
commit | 19fcec84d8d7d21e796c7624e521b60d28ee21ed (patch) | |
tree | 42d26aa27d1e3f7c0b8bd3fd14e7d7082f5008dc /src/jaegertracing/thrift/lib/rb/spec/union_spec.rb | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | ceph-19fcec84d8d7d21e796c7624e521b60d28ee21ed.tar.xz ceph-19fcec84d8d7d21e796c7624e521b60d28ee21ed.zip |
Adding upstream version 16.2.11+ds.upstream/16.2.11+dsupstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/jaegertracing/thrift/lib/rb/spec/union_spec.rb')
-rw-r--r-- | src/jaegertracing/thrift/lib/rb/spec/union_spec.rb | 214 |
1 files changed, 214 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/jaegertracing/thrift/lib/rb/spec/union_spec.rb b/src/jaegertracing/thrift/lib/rb/spec/union_spec.rb new file mode 100644 index 000000000..efb385346 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/jaegertracing/thrift/lib/rb/spec/union_spec.rb @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ +# +# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one +# or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file +# distributed with this work for additional information +# regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file +# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the +# "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance +# with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, +# software distributed under the License is distributed on an +# "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY +# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the +# specific language governing permissions and limitations +# under the License. +# + +require 'spec_helper' + +describe 'Union' do + + describe Thrift::Union do + it "should return nil value in unset union" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new + expect(union.get_set_field).to eq(nil) + expect(union.get_value).to eq(nil) + end + + it "should set a field and be accessible through get_value and the named field accessor" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new + union.integer32 = 25 + expect(union.get_set_field).to eq(:integer32) + expect(union.get_value).to eq(25) + expect(union.integer32).to eq(25) + end + + it "should work correctly when instantiated with static field constructors" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.integer32(5) + expect(union.get_set_field).to eq(:integer32) + expect(union.integer32).to eq(5) + end + + it "should raise for wrong set field" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new + union.integer32 = 25 + expect { union.some_characters }.to raise_error(RuntimeError, "some_characters is not union's set field.") + end + + it "should raise for wrong set field when hash initialized and type checking is off" do + Thrift.type_checking = false + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new({incorrect_field: :incorrect}) + expect { Thrift::Serializer.new.serialize(union) }.to raise_error(RuntimeError, "set_field is not valid for this union!") + end + + it "should not be equal to nil" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new + expect(union).not_to eq(nil) + end + + it "should not be equal with an empty String" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new + expect(union).not_to eq('') + end + + it "should not equate two different unions, i32 vs. string" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 25) + other_union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:some_characters, "blah!") + expect(union).not_to eq(other_union) + end + + it "should properly reset setfield and setvalue" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 25) + expect(union.get_set_field).to eq(:integer32) + union.some_characters = "blah!" + expect(union.get_set_field).to eq(:some_characters) + expect(union.get_value).to eq("blah!") + expect { union.integer32 }.to raise_error(RuntimeError, "integer32 is not union's set field.") + end + + it "should not equate two different unions with different values" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 25) + other_union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 400) + expect(union).not_to eq(other_union) + end + + it "should not equate two different unions with different fields" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 25) + other_union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:other_i32, 25) + expect(union).not_to eq(other_union) + end + + it "should inspect properly" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 25) + expect(union.inspect).to eq("<SpecNamespace::My_union integer32: 25>") + end + + it "should not allow setting with instance_variable_set" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 27) + union.instance_variable_set(:@some_characters, "hallo!") + expect(union.get_set_field).to eq(:integer32) + expect(union.get_value).to eq(27) + expect { union.some_characters }.to raise_error(RuntimeError, "some_characters is not union's set field.") + end + + it "should serialize to binary correctly" do + trans = Thrift::MemoryBufferTransport.new + proto = Thrift::BinaryProtocol.new(trans) + + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 25) + union.write(proto) + + other_union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 25) + other_union.read(proto) + expect(other_union).to eq(union) + end + + it "should serialize to json correctly" do + trans = Thrift::MemoryBufferTransport.new + proto = Thrift::JsonProtocol.new(trans) + + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 25) + union.write(proto) + + other_union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 25) + other_union.read(proto) + expect(other_union).to eq(union) + end + + it "should raise when validating unset union" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new + expect { union.validate }.to raise_error(StandardError, "Union fields are not set.") + + other_union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 1) + expect { other_union.validate }.not_to raise_error + end + + it "should validate an enum field properly" do + union = SpecNamespace::TestUnion.new(:enum_field, 3) + expect(union.get_set_field).to eq(:enum_field) + expect { union.validate }.to raise_error(Thrift::ProtocolException, "Invalid value of field enum_field!") + + other_union = SpecNamespace::TestUnion.new(:enum_field, 1) + expect { other_union.validate }.not_to raise_error + end + + it "should properly serialize and match structs with a union" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32, 26) + swu = SpecNamespace::Struct_with_union.new(:fun_union => union) + + trans = Thrift::MemoryBufferTransport.new + proto = Thrift::CompactProtocol.new(trans) + + swu.write(proto) + + other_union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:some_characters, "hello there") + swu2 = SpecNamespace::Struct_with_union.new(:fun_union => other_union) + + expect(swu2).not_to eq(swu) + + swu2.read(proto) + expect(swu2).to eq(swu) + end + + it "should support old style constructor" do + union = SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:integer32 => 26) + expect(union.get_set_field).to eq(:integer32) + expect(union.get_value).to eq(26) + end + + it "should not throw an error when inspected and unset" do + expect{SpecNamespace::TestUnion.new().inspect}.not_to raise_error + end + + it "should print enum value name when inspected" do + expect(SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:some_enum => SpecNamespace::SomeEnum::ONE).inspect).to eq("<SpecNamespace::My_union some_enum: ONE (0)>") + + expect(SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:my_map => {SpecNamespace::SomeEnum::ONE => [SpecNamespace::SomeEnum::TWO]}).inspect).to eq("<SpecNamespace::My_union my_map: {ONE (0): [TWO (1)]}>") + end + + it "should offer field? methods" do + expect(SpecNamespace::My_union.new.some_enum?).to be_falsey + expect(SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:some_enum => SpecNamespace::SomeEnum::ONE).some_enum?).to be_truthy + expect(SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:im_true => false).im_true?).to be_truthy + expect(SpecNamespace::My_union.new(:im_true => true).im_true?).to be_truthy + end + + it "should pretty print binary fields" do + expect(SpecNamespace::TestUnion.new(:binary_field => "\001\002\003").inspect).to eq("<SpecNamespace::TestUnion binary_field: 010203>") + end + + it "should be comparable" do + relationships = [ + [0, -1, -1, -1], + [1, 0, -1, -1], + [1, 1, 0, -1], + [1, 1, 1, 0]] + + objs = [ + SpecNamespace::TestUnion.new(:string_field, "blah"), + SpecNamespace::TestUnion.new(:string_field, "blahblah"), + SpecNamespace::TestUnion.new(:i32_field, 1), + SpecNamespace::TestUnion.new()] + + for y in 0..3 + for x in 0..3 + # puts "#{objs[y].inspect} <=> #{objs[x].inspect} should == #{relationships[y][x]}" + expect(objs[y] <=> objs[x]).to eq(relationships[y][x]) + end + end + end + end +end |