summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/rados/operations/crush-map.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/rados/operations/crush-map.rst')
-rw-r--r--doc/rados/operations/crush-map.rst1126
1 files changed, 1126 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/rados/operations/crush-map.rst b/doc/rados/operations/crush-map.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f22ebb24e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rados/operations/crush-map.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,1126 @@
+============
+ CRUSH Maps
+============
+
+The :abbr:`CRUSH (Controlled Replication Under Scalable Hashing)` algorithm
+determines how to store and retrieve data by computing storage locations.
+CRUSH empowers Ceph clients to communicate with OSDs directly rather than
+through a centralized server or broker. With an algorithmically determined
+method of storing and retrieving data, Ceph avoids a single point of failure, a
+performance bottleneck, and a physical limit to its scalability.
+
+CRUSH uses a map of your cluster (the CRUSH map) to pseudo-randomly
+map data to OSDs, distributing it across the cluster according to configured
+replication policy and failure domain. For a detailed discussion of CRUSH, see
+`CRUSH - Controlled, Scalable, Decentralized Placement of Replicated Data`_
+
+CRUSH maps contain a list of :abbr:`OSDs (Object Storage Devices)`, a hierarchy
+of 'buckets' for aggregating devices and buckets, and
+rules that govern how CRUSH replicates data within the cluster's pools. By
+reflecting the underlying physical organization of the installation, CRUSH can
+model (and thereby address) the potential for correlated device failures.
+Typical factors include chassis, racks, physical proximity, a shared power
+source, and shared networking. By encoding this information into the cluster
+map, CRUSH placement
+policies distribute object replicas across failure domains while
+maintaining the desired distribution. For example, to address the
+possibility of concurrent failures, it may be desirable to ensure that data
+replicas are on devices using different shelves, racks, power supplies,
+controllers, and/or physical locations.
+
+When you deploy OSDs they are automatically added to the CRUSH map under a
+``host`` bucket named for the node on which they run. This,
+combined with the configured CRUSH failure domain, ensures that replicas or
+erasure code shards are distributed across hosts and that a single host or other
+failure will not affect availability. For larger clusters, administrators must
+carefully consider their choice of failure domain. Separating replicas across racks,
+for example, is typical for mid- to large-sized clusters.
+
+
+CRUSH Location
+==============
+
+The location of an OSD within the CRUSH map's hierarchy is
+referred to as a ``CRUSH location``. This location specifier takes the
+form of a list of key and value pairs. For
+example, if an OSD is in a particular row, rack, chassis and host, and
+is part of the 'default' CRUSH root (which is the case for most
+clusters), its CRUSH location could be described as::
+
+ root=default row=a rack=a2 chassis=a2a host=a2a1
+
+Note:
+
+#. Note that the order of the keys does not matter.
+#. The key name (left of ``=``) must be a valid CRUSH ``type``. By default
+ these include ``root``, ``datacenter``, ``room``, ``row``, ``pod``, ``pdu``,
+ ``rack``, ``chassis`` and ``host``.
+ These defined types suffice for almost all clusters, but can be customized
+ by modifying the CRUSH map.
+#. Not all keys need to be specified. For example, by default, Ceph
+ automatically sets an ``OSD``'s location to be
+ ``root=default host=HOSTNAME`` (based on the output from ``hostname -s``).
+
+The CRUSH location for an OSD can be defined by adding the ``crush location``
+option in ``ceph.conf``. Each time the OSD starts,
+it verifies it is in the correct location in the CRUSH map and, if it is not,
+it moves itself. To disable this automatic CRUSH map management, add the
+following to your configuration file in the ``[osd]`` section::
+
+ osd crush update on start = false
+
+Note that in most cases you will not need to manually configure this.
+
+
+Custom location hooks
+---------------------
+
+A customized location hook can be used to generate a more complete
+CRUSH location on startup. The CRUSH location is based on, in order
+of preference:
+
+#. A ``crush location`` option in ``ceph.conf``
+#. A default of ``root=default host=HOSTNAME`` where the hostname is
+ derived from the ``hostname -s`` command
+
+A script can be written to provide additional
+location fields (for example, ``rack`` or ``datacenter``) and the
+hook enabled via the config option::
+
+ crush location hook = /path/to/customized-ceph-crush-location
+
+This hook is passed several arguments (below) and should output a single line
+to ``stdout`` with the CRUSH location description.::
+
+ --cluster CLUSTER --id ID --type TYPE
+
+where the cluster name is typically ``ceph``, the ``id`` is the daemon
+identifier (e.g., the OSD number or daemon identifier), and the daemon
+type is ``osd``, ``mds``, etc.
+
+For example, a simple hook that additionally specifies a rack location
+based on a value in the file ``/etc/rack`` might be::
+
+ #!/bin/sh
+ echo "host=$(hostname -s) rack=$(cat /etc/rack) root=default"
+
+
+CRUSH structure
+===============
+
+The CRUSH map consists of a hierarchy that describes
+the physical topology of the cluster and a set of rules defining
+data placement policy. The hierarchy has
+devices (OSDs) at the leaves, and internal nodes
+corresponding to other physical features or groupings: hosts, racks,
+rows, datacenters, and so on. The rules describe how replicas are
+placed in terms of that hierarchy (e.g., 'three replicas in different
+racks').
+
+Devices
+-------
+
+Devices are individual OSDs that store data, usually one for each storage drive.
+Devices are identified by an ``id``
+(a non-negative integer) and a ``name``, normally ``osd.N`` where ``N`` is the device id.
+
+Since the Luminous release, devices may also have a *device class* assigned (e.g.,
+``hdd`` or ``ssd`` or ``nvme``), allowing them to be conveniently targeted by
+CRUSH rules. This is especially useful when mixing device types within hosts.
+
+.. _crush_map_default_types:
+
+Types and Buckets
+-----------------
+
+A bucket is the CRUSH term for internal nodes in the hierarchy: hosts,
+racks, rows, etc. The CRUSH map defines a series of *types* that are
+used to describe these nodes. Default types include:
+
+- ``osd`` (or ``device``)
+- ``host``
+- ``chassis``
+- ``rack``
+- ``row``
+- ``pdu``
+- ``pod``
+- ``room``
+- ``datacenter``
+- ``zone``
+- ``region``
+- ``root``
+
+Most clusters use only a handful of these types, and others
+can be defined as needed.
+
+The hierarchy is built with devices (normally type ``osd``) at the
+leaves, interior nodes with non-device types, and a root node of type
+``root``. For example,
+
+.. ditaa::
+
+ +-----------------+
+ |{o}root default |
+ +--------+--------+
+ |
+ +---------------+---------------+
+ | |
+ +------+------+ +------+------+
+ |{o}host foo | |{o}host bar |
+ +------+------+ +------+------+
+ | |
+ +-------+-------+ +-------+-------+
+ | | | |
+ +-----+-----+ +-----+-----+ +-----+-----+ +-----+-----+
+ | osd.0 | | osd.1 | | osd.2 | | osd.3 |
+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+
+
+Each node (device or bucket) in the hierarchy has a *weight*
+that indicates the relative proportion of the total
+data that device or hierarchy subtree should store. Weights are set
+at the leaves, indicating the size of the device, and automatically
+sum up the tree, such that the weight of the ``root`` node
+will be the total of all devices contained beneath it. Normally
+weights are in units of terabytes (TB).
+
+You can get a simple view the of CRUSH hierarchy for your cluster,
+including weights, with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd tree
+
+Rules
+-----
+
+CRUSH Rules define policy about how data is distributed across the devices
+in the hierarchy. They define placement and replication strategies or
+distribution policies that allow you to specify exactly how CRUSH
+places data replicas. For example, you might create a rule selecting
+a pair of targets for two-way mirroring, another rule for selecting
+three targets in two different data centers for three-way mirroring, and
+yet another rule for erasure coding (EC) across six storage devices. For a
+detailed discussion of CRUSH rules, refer to `CRUSH - Controlled,
+Scalable, Decentralized Placement of Replicated Data`_, and more
+specifically to **Section 3.2**.
+
+CRUSH rules can be created via the CLI by
+specifying the *pool type* they will be used for (replicated or
+erasure coded), the *failure domain*, and optionally a *device class*.
+In rare cases rules must be written by hand by manually editing the
+CRUSH map.
+
+You can see what rules are defined for your cluster with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush rule ls
+
+You can view the contents of the rules with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush rule dump
+
+Device classes
+--------------
+
+Each device can optionally have a *class* assigned. By
+default, OSDs automatically set their class at startup to
+`hdd`, `ssd`, or `nvme` based on the type of device they are backed
+by.
+
+The device class for one or more OSDs can be explicitly set with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush set-device-class <class> <osd-name> [...]
+
+Once a device class is set, it cannot be changed to another class
+until the old class is unset with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush rm-device-class <osd-name> [...]
+
+This allows administrators to set device classes without the class
+being changed on OSD restart or by some other script.
+
+A placement rule that targets a specific device class can be created with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush rule create-replicated <rule-name> <root> <failure-domain> <class>
+
+A pool can then be changed to use the new rule with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd pool set <pool-name> crush_rule <rule-name>
+
+Device classes are implemented by creating a "shadow" CRUSH hierarchy
+for each device class in use that contains only devices of that class.
+CRUSH rules can then distribute data over the shadow hierarchy.
+This approach is fully backward compatible with
+old Ceph clients. You can view the CRUSH hierarchy with shadow items
+with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush tree --show-shadow
+
+For older clusters created before Luminous that relied on manually
+crafted CRUSH maps to maintain per-device-type hierarchies, there is a
+*reclassify* tool available to help transition to device classes
+without triggering data movement (see :ref:`crush-reclassify`).
+
+
+Weights sets
+------------
+
+A *weight set* is an alternative set of weights to use when
+calculating data placement. The normal weights associated with each
+device in the CRUSH map are set based on the device size and indicate
+how much data we *should* be storing where. However, because CRUSH is
+a "probabilistic" pseudorandom placement process, there is always some
+variation from this ideal distribution, in the same way that rolling a
+die sixty times will not result in rolling exactly 10 ones and 10
+sixes. Weight sets allow the cluster to perform numerical optimization
+based on the specifics of your cluster (hierarchy, pools, etc.) to achieve
+a balanced distribution.
+
+There are two types of weight sets supported:
+
+ #. A **compat** weight set is a single alternative set of weights for
+ each device and node in the cluster. This is not well-suited for
+ correcting for all anomalies (for example, placement groups for
+ different pools may be different sizes and have different load
+ levels, but will be mostly treated the same by the balancer).
+ However, compat weight sets have the huge advantage that they are
+ *backward compatible* with previous versions of Ceph, which means
+ that even though weight sets were first introduced in Luminous
+ v12.2.z, older clients (e.g., firefly) can still connect to the
+ cluster when a compat weight set is being used to balance data.
+ #. A **per-pool** weight set is more flexible in that it allows
+ placement to be optimized for each data pool. Additionally,
+ weights can be adjusted for each position of placement, allowing
+ the optimizer to correct for a subtle skew of data toward devices
+ with small weights relative to their peers (and effect that is
+ usually only apparently in very large clusters but which can cause
+ balancing problems).
+
+When weight sets are in use, the weights associated with each node in
+the hierarchy is visible as a separate column (labeled either
+``(compat)`` or the pool name) from the command:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd tree
+
+When both *compat* and *per-pool* weight sets are in use, data
+placement for a particular pool will use its own per-pool weight set
+if present. If not, it will use the compat weight set if present. If
+neither are present, it will use the normal CRUSH weights.
+
+Although weight sets can be set up and manipulated by hand, it is
+recommended that the ``ceph-mgr`` *balancer* module be enabled to do so
+automatically when running Luminous or later releases.
+
+
+Modifying the CRUSH map
+=======================
+
+.. _addosd:
+
+Add/Move an OSD
+---------------
+
+.. note: OSDs are normally automatically added to the CRUSH map when
+ the OSD is created. This command is rarely needed.
+
+To add or move an OSD in the CRUSH map of a running cluster:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush set {name} {weight} root={root} [{bucket-type}={bucket-name} ...]
+
+Where:
+
+``name``
+
+:Description: The full name of the OSD.
+:Type: String
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``osd.0``
+
+
+``weight``
+
+:Description: The CRUSH weight for the OSD, normally its size measure in terabytes (TB).
+:Type: Double
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``2.0``
+
+
+``root``
+
+:Description: The root node of the tree in which the OSD resides (normally ``default``)
+:Type: Key/value pair.
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``root=default``
+
+
+``bucket-type``
+
+:Description: You may specify the OSD's location in the CRUSH hierarchy.
+:Type: Key/value pairs.
+:Required: No
+:Example: ``datacenter=dc1 room=room1 row=foo rack=bar host=foo-bar-1``
+
+
+The following example adds ``osd.0`` to the hierarchy, or moves the
+OSD from a previous location:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush set osd.0 1.0 root=default datacenter=dc1 room=room1 row=foo rack=bar host=foo-bar-1
+
+
+Adjust OSD weight
+-----------------
+
+.. note: Normally OSDs automatically add themselves to the CRUSH map
+ with the correct weight when they are created. This command
+ is rarely needed.
+
+To adjust an OSD's CRUSH weight in the CRUSH map of a running cluster, execute
+the following:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush reweight {name} {weight}
+
+Where:
+
+``name``
+
+:Description: The full name of the OSD.
+:Type: String
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``osd.0``
+
+
+``weight``
+
+:Description: The CRUSH weight for the OSD.
+:Type: Double
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``2.0``
+
+
+.. _removeosd:
+
+Remove an OSD
+-------------
+
+.. note: OSDs are normally removed from the CRUSH as part of the
+ ``ceph osd purge`` command. This command is rarely needed.
+
+To remove an OSD from the CRUSH map of a running cluster, execute the
+following:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush remove {name}
+
+Where:
+
+``name``
+
+:Description: The full name of the OSD.
+:Type: String
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``osd.0``
+
+
+Add a Bucket
+------------
+
+.. note: Buckets are implicitly created when an OSD is added
+ that specifies a ``{bucket-type}={bucket-name}`` as part of its
+ location, if a bucket with that name does not already exist. This
+ command is typically used when manually adjusting the structure of the
+ hierarchy after OSDs have been created. One use is to move a
+ series of hosts underneath a new rack-level bucket; another is to
+ add new ``host`` buckets (OSD nodes) to a dummy ``root`` so that they don't
+ receive data until you're ready, at which time you would move them to the
+ ``default`` or other root as described below.
+
+To add a bucket in the CRUSH map of a running cluster, execute the
+``ceph osd crush add-bucket`` command:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush add-bucket {bucket-name} {bucket-type}
+
+Where:
+
+``bucket-name``
+
+:Description: The full name of the bucket.
+:Type: String
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``rack12``
+
+
+``bucket-type``
+
+:Description: The type of the bucket. The type must already exist in the hierarchy.
+:Type: String
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``rack``
+
+
+The following example adds the ``rack12`` bucket to the hierarchy:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush add-bucket rack12 rack
+
+Move a Bucket
+-------------
+
+To move a bucket to a different location or position in the CRUSH map
+hierarchy, execute the following:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush move {bucket-name} {bucket-type}={bucket-name}, [...]
+
+Where:
+
+``bucket-name``
+
+:Description: The name of the bucket to move/reposition.
+:Type: String
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``foo-bar-1``
+
+``bucket-type``
+
+:Description: You may specify the bucket's location in the CRUSH hierarchy.
+:Type: Key/value pairs.
+:Required: No
+:Example: ``datacenter=dc1 room=room1 row=foo rack=bar host=foo-bar-1``
+
+Remove a Bucket
+---------------
+
+To remove a bucket from the CRUSH hierarchy, execute the following:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush remove {bucket-name}
+
+.. note:: A bucket must be empty before removing it from the CRUSH hierarchy.
+
+Where:
+
+``bucket-name``
+
+:Description: The name of the bucket that you'd like to remove.
+:Type: String
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``rack12``
+
+The following example removes the ``rack12`` bucket from the hierarchy:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush remove rack12
+
+Creating a compat weight set
+----------------------------
+
+.. note: This step is normally done automatically by the ``balancer``
+ module when enabled.
+
+To create a *compat* weight set:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush weight-set create-compat
+
+Weights for the compat weight set can be adjusted with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush weight-set reweight-compat {name} {weight}
+
+The compat weight set can be destroyed with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush weight-set rm-compat
+
+Creating per-pool weight sets
+-----------------------------
+
+To create a weight set for a specific pool:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush weight-set create {pool-name} {mode}
+
+.. note:: Per-pool weight sets require that all servers and daemons
+ run Luminous v12.2.z or later.
+
+Where:
+
+``pool-name``
+
+:Description: The name of a RADOS pool
+:Type: String
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``rbd``
+
+``mode``
+
+:Description: Either ``flat`` or ``positional``. A *flat* weight set
+ has a single weight for each device or bucket. A
+ *positional* weight set has a potentially different
+ weight for each position in the resulting placement
+ mapping. For example, if a pool has a replica count of
+ 3, then a positional weight set will have three weights
+ for each device and bucket.
+:Type: String
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``flat``
+
+To adjust the weight of an item in a weight set:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush weight-set reweight {pool-name} {item-name} {weight [...]}
+
+To list existing weight sets:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush weight-set ls
+
+To remove a weight set:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush weight-set rm {pool-name}
+
+Creating a rule for a replicated pool
+-------------------------------------
+
+For a replicated pool, the primary decision when creating the CRUSH
+rule is what the failure domain is going to be. For example, if a
+failure domain of ``host`` is selected, then CRUSH will ensure that
+each replica of the data is stored on a unique host. If ``rack``
+is selected, then each replica will be stored in a different rack.
+What failure domain you choose primarily depends on the size and
+topology of your cluster.
+
+In most cases the entire cluster hierarchy is nested beneath a root node
+named ``default``. If you have customized your hierarchy, you may
+want to create a rule nested at some other node in the hierarchy. It
+doesn't matter what type is associated with that node (it doesn't have
+to be a ``root`` node).
+
+It is also possible to create a rule that restricts data placement to
+a specific *class* of device. By default, Ceph OSDs automatically
+classify themselves as either ``hdd`` or ``ssd``, depending on the
+underlying type of device being used. These classes can also be
+customized.
+
+To create a replicated rule:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush rule create-replicated {name} {root} {failure-domain-type} [{class}]
+
+Where:
+
+``name``
+
+:Description: The name of the rule
+:Type: String
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``rbd-rule``
+
+``root``
+
+:Description: The name of the node under which data should be placed.
+:Type: String
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``default``
+
+``failure-domain-type``
+
+:Description: The type of CRUSH nodes across which we should separate replicas.
+:Type: String
+:Required: Yes
+:Example: ``rack``
+
+``class``
+
+:Description: The device class on which data should be placed.
+:Type: String
+:Required: No
+:Example: ``ssd``
+
+Creating a rule for an erasure coded pool
+-----------------------------------------
+
+For an erasure-coded (EC) pool, the same basic decisions need to be made:
+what is the failure domain, which node in the
+hierarchy will data be placed under (usually ``default``), and will
+placement be restricted to a specific device class. Erasure code
+pools are created a bit differently, however, because they need to be
+constructed carefully based on the erasure code being used. For this reason,
+you must include this information in the *erasure code profile*. A CRUSH
+rule will then be created from that either explicitly or automatically when
+the profile is used to create a pool.
+
+The erasure code profiles can be listed with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd erasure-code-profile ls
+
+An existing profile can be viewed with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd erasure-code-profile get {profile-name}
+
+Normally profiles should never be modified; instead, a new profile
+should be created and used when creating a new pool or creating a new
+rule for an existing pool.
+
+An erasure code profile consists of a set of key=value pairs. Most of
+these control the behavior of the erasure code that is encoding data
+in the pool. Those that begin with ``crush-``, however, affect the
+CRUSH rule that is created.
+
+The erasure code profile properties of interest are:
+
+ * **crush-root**: the name of the CRUSH node under which to place data [default: ``default``].
+ * **crush-failure-domain**: the CRUSH bucket type across which to distribute erasure-coded shards [default: ``host``].
+ * **crush-device-class**: the device class on which to place data [default: none, meaning all devices are used].
+ * **k** and **m** (and, for the ``lrc`` plugin, **l**): these determine the number of erasure code shards, affecting the resulting CRUSH rule.
+
+Once a profile is defined, you can create a CRUSH rule with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush rule create-erasure {name} {profile-name}
+
+.. note: When creating a new pool, it is not actually necessary to
+ explicitly create the rule. If the erasure code profile alone is
+ specified and the rule argument is left off then Ceph will create
+ the CRUSH rule automatically.
+
+Deleting rules
+--------------
+
+Rules that are not in use by pools can be deleted with:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush rule rm {rule-name}
+
+
+.. _crush-map-tunables:
+
+Tunables
+========
+
+Over time, we have made (and continue to make) improvements to the
+CRUSH algorithm used to calculate the placement of data. In order to
+support the change in behavior, we have introduced a series of tunable
+options that control whether the legacy or improved variation of the
+algorithm is used.
+
+In order to use newer tunables, both clients and servers must support
+the new version of CRUSH. For this reason, we have created
+``profiles`` that are named after the Ceph version in which they were
+introduced. For example, the ``firefly`` tunables are first supported
+by the Firefly release, and will not work with older (e.g., Dumpling)
+clients. Once a given set of tunables are changed from the legacy
+default behavior, the ``ceph-mon`` and ``ceph-osd`` will prevent older
+clients who do not support the new CRUSH features from connecting to
+the cluster.
+
+argonaut (legacy)
+-----------------
+
+The legacy CRUSH behavior used by Argonaut and older releases works
+fine for most clusters, provided there are not many OSDs that have
+been marked out.
+
+bobtail (CRUSH_TUNABLES2)
+-------------------------
+
+The ``bobtail`` tunable profile fixes a few key misbehaviors:
+
+ * For hierarchies with a small number of devices in the leaf buckets,
+ some PGs map to fewer than the desired number of replicas. This
+ commonly happens for hierarchies with "host" nodes with a small
+ number (1-3) of OSDs nested beneath each one.
+
+ * For large clusters, some small percentages of PGs map to fewer than
+ the desired number of OSDs. This is more prevalent when there are
+ mutiple hierarchy layers in use (e.g., ``row``, ``rack``, ``host``, ``osd``).
+
+ * When some OSDs are marked out, the data tends to get redistributed
+ to nearby OSDs instead of across the entire hierarchy.
+
+The new tunables are:
+
+ * ``choose_local_tries``: Number of local retries. Legacy value is
+ 2, optimal value is 0.
+
+ * ``choose_local_fallback_tries``: Legacy value is 5, optimal value
+ is 0.
+
+ * ``choose_total_tries``: Total number of attempts to choose an item.
+ Legacy value was 19, subsequent testing indicates that a value of
+ 50 is more appropriate for typical clusters. For extremely large
+ clusters, a larger value might be necessary.
+
+ * ``chooseleaf_descend_once``: Whether a recursive chooseleaf attempt
+ will retry, or only try once and allow the original placement to
+ retry. Legacy default is 0, optimal value is 1.
+
+Migration impact:
+
+ * Moving from ``argonaut`` to ``bobtail`` tunables triggers a moderate amount
+ of data movement. Use caution on a cluster that is already
+ populated with data.
+
+firefly (CRUSH_TUNABLES3)
+-------------------------
+
+The ``firefly`` tunable profile fixes a problem
+with ``chooseleaf`` CRUSH rule behavior that tends to result in PG
+mappings with too few results when too many OSDs have been marked out.
+
+The new tunable is:
+
+ * ``chooseleaf_vary_r``: Whether a recursive chooseleaf attempt will
+ start with a non-zero value of ``r``, based on how many attempts the
+ parent has already made. Legacy default is ``0``, but with this value
+ CRUSH is sometimes unable to find a mapping. The optimal value (in
+ terms of computational cost and correctness) is ``1``.
+
+Migration impact:
+
+ * For existing clusters that house lots of data, changing
+ from ``0`` to ``1`` will cause a lot of data to move; a value of ``4`` or ``5``
+ will allow CRUSH to still find a valid mapping but will cause less data
+ to move.
+
+straw_calc_version tunable (introduced with Firefly too)
+--------------------------------------------------------
+
+There were some problems with the internal weights calculated and
+stored in the CRUSH map for ``straw`` algorithm buckets. Specifically, when
+there were items with a CRUSH weight of ``0``, or both a mix of different and
+unique weights, CRUSH would distribute data incorrectly (i.e.,
+not in proportion to the weights).
+
+The new tunable is:
+
+ * ``straw_calc_version``: A value of ``0`` preserves the old, broken
+ internal weight calculation; a value of ``1`` fixes the behavior.
+
+Migration impact:
+
+ * Moving to straw_calc_version ``1`` and then adjusting a straw bucket
+ (by adding, removing, or reweighting an item, or by using the
+ reweight-all command) can trigger a small to moderate amount of
+ data movement *if* the cluster has hit one of the problematic
+ conditions.
+
+This tunable option is special because it has absolutely no impact
+concerning the required kernel version in the client side.
+
+hammer (CRUSH_V4)
+-----------------
+
+The ``hammer`` tunable profile does not affect the
+mapping of existing CRUSH maps simply by changing the profile. However:
+
+ * There is a new bucket algorithm (``straw2``) supported. The new
+ ``straw2`` bucket algorithm fixes several limitations in the original
+ ``straw``. Specifically, the old ``straw`` buckets would
+ change some mappings that should have changed when a weight was
+ adjusted, while ``straw2`` achieves the original goal of only
+ changing mappings to or from the bucket item whose weight has
+ changed.
+
+ * ``straw2`` is the default for any newly created buckets.
+
+Migration impact:
+
+ * Changing a bucket type from ``straw`` to ``straw2`` will result in
+ a reasonably small amount of data movement, depending on how much
+ the bucket item weights vary from each other. When the weights are
+ all the same no data will move, and when item weights vary
+ significantly there will be more movement.
+
+jewel (CRUSH_TUNABLES5)
+-----------------------
+
+The ``jewel`` tunable profile improves the
+overall behavior of CRUSH such that significantly fewer mappings
+change when an OSD is marked out of the cluster. This results in
+significantly less data movement.
+
+The new tunable is:
+
+ * ``chooseleaf_stable``: Whether a recursive chooseleaf attempt will
+ use a better value for an inner loop that greatly reduces the number
+ of mapping changes when an OSD is marked out. The legacy value is ``0``,
+ while the new value of ``1`` uses the new approach.
+
+Migration impact:
+
+ * Changing this value on an existing cluster will result in a very
+ large amount of data movement as almost every PG mapping is likely
+ to change.
+
+
+
+
+Which client versions support CRUSH_TUNABLES
+--------------------------------------------
+
+ * argonaut series, v0.48.1 or later
+ * v0.49 or later
+ * Linux kernel version v3.6 or later (for the file system and RBD kernel clients)
+
+Which client versions support CRUSH_TUNABLES2
+---------------------------------------------
+
+ * v0.55 or later, including bobtail series (v0.56.x)
+ * Linux kernel version v3.9 or later (for the file system and RBD kernel clients)
+
+Which client versions support CRUSH_TUNABLES3
+---------------------------------------------
+
+ * v0.78 (firefly) or later
+ * Linux kernel version v3.15 or later (for the file system and RBD kernel clients)
+
+Which client versions support CRUSH_V4
+--------------------------------------
+
+ * v0.94 (hammer) or later
+ * Linux kernel version v4.1 or later (for the file system and RBD kernel clients)
+
+Which client versions support CRUSH_TUNABLES5
+---------------------------------------------
+
+ * v10.0.2 (jewel) or later
+ * Linux kernel version v4.5 or later (for the file system and RBD kernel clients)
+
+Warning when tunables are non-optimal
+-------------------------------------
+
+Starting with version v0.74, Ceph will issue a health warning if the
+current CRUSH tunables don't include all the optimal values from the
+``default`` profile (see below for the meaning of the ``default`` profile).
+To make this warning go away, you have two options:
+
+1. Adjust the tunables on the existing cluster. Note that this will
+ result in some data movement (possibly as much as 10%). This is the
+ preferred route, but should be taken with care on a production cluster
+ where the data movement may affect performance. You can enable optimal
+ tunables with:
+
+ .. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush tunables optimal
+
+ If things go poorly (e.g., too much load) and not very much
+ progress has been made, or there is a client compatibility problem
+ (old kernel CephFS or RBD clients, or pre-Bobtail ``librados``
+ clients), you can switch back with:
+
+ .. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush tunables legacy
+
+2. You can make the warning go away without making any changes to CRUSH by
+ adding the following option to your ceph.conf ``[mon]`` section::
+
+ mon warn on legacy crush tunables = false
+
+ For the change to take effect, you will need to restart the monitors, or
+ apply the option to running monitors with:
+
+ .. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph tell mon.\* config set mon_warn_on_legacy_crush_tunables false
+
+
+A few important points
+----------------------
+
+ * Adjusting these values will result in the shift of some PGs between
+ storage nodes. If the Ceph cluster is already storing a lot of
+ data, be prepared for some fraction of the data to move.
+ * The ``ceph-osd`` and ``ceph-mon`` daemons will start requiring the
+ feature bits of new connections as soon as they get
+ the updated map. However, already-connected clients are
+ effectively grandfathered in, and will misbehave if they do not
+ support the new feature.
+ * If the CRUSH tunables are set to non-legacy values and then later
+ changed back to the default values, ``ceph-osd`` daemons will not be
+ required to support the feature. However, the OSD peering process
+ requires examining and understanding old maps. Therefore, you
+ should not run old versions of the ``ceph-osd`` daemon
+ if the cluster has previously used non-legacy CRUSH values, even if
+ the latest version of the map has been switched back to using the
+ legacy defaults.
+
+Tuning CRUSH
+------------
+
+The simplest way to adjust CRUSH tunables is by applying them in matched
+sets known as *profiles*. As of the Octopus release these are:
+
+ * ``legacy``: the legacy behavior from argonaut and earlier.
+ * ``argonaut``: the legacy values supported by the original argonaut release
+ * ``bobtail``: the values supported by the bobtail release
+ * ``firefly``: the values supported by the firefly release
+ * ``hammer``: the values supported by the hammer release
+ * ``jewel``: the values supported by the jewel release
+ * ``optimal``: the best (i.e. optimal) values of the current version of Ceph
+ * ``default``: the default values of a new cluster installed from
+ scratch. These values, which depend on the current version of Ceph,
+ are hardcoded and are generally a mix of optimal and legacy values.
+ These values generally match the ``optimal`` profile of the previous
+ LTS release, or the most recent release for which we generally expect
+ most users to have up-to-date clients for.
+
+You can apply a profile to a running cluster with the command:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd crush tunables {PROFILE}
+
+Note that this may result in data movement, potentially quite a bit. Study
+release notes and documentation carefully before changing the profile on a
+running cluster, and consider throttling recovery/backfill parameters to
+limit the impact of a bolus of backfill.
+
+.. _CRUSH - Controlled, Scalable, Decentralized Placement of Replicated Data: https://ceph.io/assets/pdfs/weil-crush-sc06.pdf
+
+
+Primary Affinity
+================
+
+When a Ceph Client reads or writes data, it first contacts the primary OSD in
+each affected PG's acting set. By default, the first OSD in the acting set is
+the primary. For example, in the acting set ``[2, 3, 4]``, ``osd.2`` is
+listed first and thus is the primary (aka lead) OSD. Sometimes we know that an
+OSD is less well suited to act as the lead than are other OSDs (e.g., it has
+a slow drive or a slow controller). To prevent performance bottlenecks
+(especially on read operations) while maximizing utilization of your hardware,
+you can influence the selection of primary OSDs by adjusting primary affinity
+values, or by crafting a CRUSH rule that selects preferred OSDs first.
+
+Tuning primary OSD selection is mainly useful for replicated pools, because
+by default read operations are served from the primary OSD for each PG.
+For erasure coded (EC) pools, a way to speed up read operations is to enable
+**fast read** as described in :ref:`pool-settings`.
+
+A common scenario for primary affinity is when a cluster contains
+a mix of drive sizes, for example older racks with 1.9 TB SATA SSDS and newer racks with
+3.84TB SATA SSDs. On average the latter will be assigned double the number of
+PGs and thus will serve double the number of write and read operations, thus
+they'll be busier than the former. A rough assignment of primary affinity
+inversely proportional to OSD size won't be 100% optimal, but it can readily
+achieve a 15% improvement in overall read throughput by utilizing SATA
+interface bandwidth and CPU cycles more evenly.
+
+By default, all ceph OSDs have primary affinity of ``1``, which indicates that
+any OSD may act as a primary with equal probability.
+
+You can reduce a Ceph OSD's primary affinity so that CRUSH is less likely to
+choose the OSD as primary in a PG's acting set.:
+
+.. prompt:: bash $
+
+ ceph osd primary-affinity <osd-id> <weight>
+
+You may set an OSD's primary affinity to a real number in the range ``[0-1]``,
+where ``0`` indicates that the OSD may **NOT** be used as a primary and ``1``
+indicates that an OSD may be used as a primary. When the weight is between
+these extremes, it is less likely that CRUSH will select that OSD as a primary.
+The process for selecting the lead OSD is more nuanced than a simple
+probability based on relative affinity values, but measurable results can be
+achieved even with first-order approximations of desirable values.
+
+Custom CRUSH Rules
+------------------
+
+There are occasional clusters that balance cost and performance by mixing SSDs
+and HDDs in the same replicated pool. By setting the primary affinity of HDD
+OSDs to ``0`` one can direct operations to the SSD in each acting set. An
+alternative is to define a CRUSH rule that always selects an SSD OSD as the
+first OSD, then selects HDDs for the remaining OSDs. Thus, each PG's acting
+set will contain exactly one SSD OSD as the primary with the balance on HDDs.
+
+For example, the CRUSH rule below::
+
+ rule mixed_replicated_rule {
+ id 11
+ type replicated
+ min_size 1
+ max_size 10
+ step take default class ssd
+ step chooseleaf firstn 1 type host
+ step emit
+ step take default class hdd
+ step chooseleaf firstn 0 type host
+ step emit
+ }
+
+chooses an SSD as the first OSD. Note that for an ``N``-times replicated pool
+this rule selects ``N+1`` OSDs to guarantee that ``N`` copies are on different
+hosts, because the first SSD OSD might be co-located with any of the ``N`` HDD
+OSDs.
+
+This extra storage requirement can be avoided by placing SSDs and HDDs in
+different hosts with the tradeoff that hosts with SSDs will receive all client
+requests. You may thus consider faster CPU(s) for SSD hosts and more modest
+ones for HDD nodes, since the latter will normally only service recovery
+operations. Here the CRUSH roots ``ssd_hosts`` and ``hdd_hosts`` strictly
+must not contain the same servers::
+
+ rule mixed_replicated_rule_two {
+ id 1
+ type replicated
+ min_size 1
+ max_size 10
+ step take ssd_hosts class ssd
+ step chooseleaf firstn 1 type host
+ step emit
+ step take hdd_hosts class hdd
+ step chooseleaf firstn -1 type host
+ step emit
+ }
+
+
+Note also that on failure of an SSD, requests to a PG will be served temporarily
+from a (slower) HDD OSD until the PG's data has been replicated onto the replacement
+primary SSD OSD.
+