Adding upstream version 115.7.0esr.upstream/115.7.0esrupstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/js/src/jit-test/tests/wasm/float-unaligned.js b/js/src/jit-test/tests/wasm/float-unaligned.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a22ffe5fee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/js/src/jit-test/tests/wasm/float-unaligned.js
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+// Various tests for unaligned float accesses.  These are specifically meant to
+// test the SIGBUS handling on 32-bit ARM by exercising odd addresses and odd
+// offsets.
+
+// For a triple of (numBallast, ty, offset), create the text for a pair of
+// functions "get_ty_offset" and "set_ty_offset" where each has numBallast live
+// dummy values across the operation of interest to force the use of different
+// register numbers.  (This is primarily for the FP registers as ARM code
+// generation currently always uses the same scratch register for the base
+// address of the access.)
+//
+// These must be augmented with a memory.  Memory addresses 0-255 are reserved
+// for internal use by these functions.  The memory must start as zero.
+
+function makeLoadStore(numBallast, ty, offset) {
+    // The general idea of the ballast is that we occupy some FP registers and
+    // some int registers with non-dead values before we perform an operation,
+    // and then we consume the occupied registers after.
+    //
+    // In the case of load, the loaded result is stored back in memory before we
+    // consume the ballast, thus the ion regalloc will not simply always load
+    // the result into d0, but usually into some temp other than d0.  Thus the
+    // amount of ballast affects the register.  (Ditto baseline though the
+    // reasoning is simpler.)
+    //
+    // In the case of store, we keep the parameter value live until the end so
+    // that the tmp that we compute for the store is moved into a different
+    // register.  The tmp has the same value as the parameter value but a
+    // non-JIT compiler can't know that.
+
+    let loadtxt =
+      `(func (export "get_${ty}_${offset}") (param $p i32) (result ${ty})
+         ${ballast(() => `
+              (i32.const 8)
+              (i32.store (i32.const 8) (i32.add (i32.load (i32.const 8)) (i32.const 1)))
+              (${ty}.load (i32.const 8))`)}
+
+         (${ty}.store (i32.const 0) (${ty}.load offset=${offset} (local.get $p)))
+
+         ${ballast(() => `
+             ${ty}.store`)}
+
+         (${ty}.load (i32.const 0)))`;
+
+    // This will assume the value at mem[16] is zero.
+    let storetxt =
+      `(func (export "set_${ty}_${offset}") (param $p i32) (param $v ${ty})
+         (local $tmp ${ty})
+         ${ballast(() => `
+              (i32.const 8)
+              (i32.store (i32.const 8) (i32.add (i32.load (i32.const 8)) (i32.const 1)))
+              (${ty}.load (i32.const 8))`)}
+
+         (local.set $tmp (${ty}.add (local.get $v) (${ty}.load (i32.const 16))))
+         (${ty}.store offset=${offset} (local.get $p) (local.get $tmp))
+
+         ${ballast(() => `
+             ${ty}.store`)}
+         (${ty}.store (i32.const 8) (local.get $v)))`;
+
+    return `${loadtxt}
+            ${storetxt}`;
+
+    function ballast(thunk) {
+        let s = "";
+        for ( let i=0 ; i < numBallast; i++ )
+            s += thunk();
+        return s;
+    }
+}
+
+// The complexity here comes from trying to force the source/target FP registers
+// in the FP access instruction to vary.  For Baseline this is not hard; for Ion
+// trickier.
+
+function makeInstance(numBallast, offset) {
+    let txt =
+        `(module
+           (memory (export "memory") 1 1)
+           ${makeLoadStore(numBallast, 'f64', offset)}
+           ${makeLoadStore(numBallast, 'f32', offset)})`;
+    return new WebAssembly.Instance(new WebAssembly.Module(wasmTextToBinary(txt)));
+}
+
+// `offset` corresponds to the "offset" directive in the instruction
+for ( let offset=0 ; offset < 8; offset++ ) {
+
+    // `numBallast` represents the amount of ballast registers we're trying to use,
+    // see comments above.
+    for ( let numBallast=0; numBallast < 16; numBallast++ ) {
+        let ins = makeInstance(numBallast, offset);
+        let mem = ins.exports.memory;
+        let buf = new DataView(mem.buffer);
+
+        // `i` represents the offset in the pointer from a proper boundary
+        for ( let i=0; i < 9; i++ ) {
+	    let offs = 256+i;
+            let val = Math.PI+i;
+
+            buf.setFloat64(offs + offset, val, true);
+            assertEq(ins.exports["get_f64_" + offset](offs), val);
+
+            ins.exports["set_f64_" + offset](offs + 32, val);
+            assertEq(buf.getFloat64(offs + 32 + offset, true), val);
+        }
+
+        for ( let i=0; i < 9; i++ ) {
+            let offs = 512+i;
+            let val = Math.fround(Math.PI+i);
+
+            buf.setFloat32(offs + offset, val, true);
+            assertEq(ins.exports["get_f32_" + offset](offs), val);
+
+            ins.exports["set_f32_" + offset](offs + 32, val);
+            assertEq(buf.getFloat32(offs + 32 + offset, true), val);
+        }
+    }
+}