diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 19:33:14 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 19:33:14 +0000 |
commit | 36d22d82aa202bb199967e9512281e9a53db42c9 (patch) | |
tree | 105e8c98ddea1c1e4784a60a5a6410fa416be2de /js/src/tests/non262/RegExp/regress-188206.js | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | firefox-esr-36d22d82aa202bb199967e9512281e9a53db42c9.tar.xz firefox-esr-36d22d82aa202bb199967e9512281e9a53db42c9.zip |
Adding upstream version 115.7.0esr.upstream/115.7.0esrupstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | js/src/tests/non262/RegExp/regress-188206.js | 182 |
1 files changed, 182 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/js/src/tests/non262/RegExp/regress-188206.js b/js/src/tests/non262/RegExp/regress-188206.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0ca4d46610 --- /dev/null +++ b/js/src/tests/non262/RegExp/regress-188206.js @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@ +/* -*- indent-tabs-mode: nil; js-indent-level: 2 -*- */ +/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public + * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this + * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */ + +/* + * + * Date: 21 January 2003 + * SUMMARY: Invalid use of regexp quantifiers should generate SyntaxErrors + * + * See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188206 + * and http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85721#c48 etc. + * and http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190685 + * and http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197451 + */ +//----------------------------------------------------------------------------- +var UBound = 0; +var BUGNUMBER = 188206; +var summary = 'Invalid use of regexp quantifiers should generate SyntaxErrors'; +var TEST_PASSED = 'SyntaxError'; +var TEST_FAILED = 'Generated an error, but NOT a SyntaxError!'; +var TEST_FAILED_BADLY = 'Did not generate ANY error!!!'; +var CHECK_PASSED = 'Should not generate an error'; +var CHECK_FAILED = 'Generated an error!'; +var status = ''; +var statusitems = []; +var actual = ''; +var actualvalues = []; +var expect= ''; +var expectedvalues = []; + + +/* + * All the following are invalid uses of regexp quantifiers and + * should generate SyntaxErrors. That's what we're testing for. + * + * To allow the test to compile and run, we have to hide the errors + * inside eval strings, and check they are caught at run-time - + * + */ +status = inSection(1); +testThis(' /a**/ '); + +status = inSection(2); +testThis(' /a***/ '); + +status = inSection(3); +testThis(' /a++/ '); + +status = inSection(4); +testThis(' /a+++/ '); + +/* + * The ? quantifier, unlike * or +, may appear twice in succession. + * Thus we need at least three in a row to provoke a SyntaxError - + */ + +status = inSection(5); +testThis(' /a???/ '); + +status = inSection(6); +testThis(' /a????/ '); + + +/* + * Now do some weird things on the left side of the regexps - + */ +status = inSection(9); +testThis(' /+a/ '); + +status = inSection(10); +testThis(' /++a/ '); + +status = inSection(11); +testThis(' /?a/ '); + +status = inSection(12); +testThis(' /??a/ '); + + +/* + * Misusing the {DecmalDigits} quantifier - according to BOTH ECMA and Perl. + * + * Just as with the * and + quantifiers above, can't have two {DecmalDigits} + * quantifiers in succession - it's a SyntaxError. + */ +status = inSection(28); +testThis(' /x{1}{1}/ '); + +status = inSection(29); +testThis(' /x{1,}{1}/ '); + +status = inSection(30); +testThis(' /x{1,2}{1}/ '); + +status = inSection(31); +testThis(' /x{1}{1,}/ '); + +status = inSection(32); +testThis(' /x{1,}{1,}/ '); + +status = inSection(33); +testThis(' /x{1,2}{1,}/ '); + +status = inSection(34); +testThis(' /x{1}{1,2}/ '); + +status = inSection(35); +testThis(' /x{1,}{1,2}/ '); + +status = inSection(36); +testThis(' /x{1,2}{1,2}/ '); + + + +//----------------------------------------------------------------------------- +test(); +//----------------------------------------------------------------------------- + + + +/* + * Invalid syntax should generate a SyntaxError + */ +function testThis(sInvalidSyntax) +{ + expect = TEST_PASSED; + actual = TEST_FAILED_BADLY; + + try + { + eval(sInvalidSyntax); + } + catch(e) + { + if (e instanceof SyntaxError) + actual = TEST_PASSED; + else + actual = TEST_FAILED; + } + + statusitems[UBound] = status; + expectedvalues[UBound] = expect; + actualvalues[UBound] = actual; + UBound++; +} + + +/* + * Allowed syntax shouldn't generate any errors + */ +function checkThis(sAllowedSyntax) +{ + expect = CHECK_PASSED; + actual = CHECK_PASSED; + + try + { + eval(sAllowedSyntax); + } + catch(e) + { + actual = CHECK_FAILED; + } + + statusitems[UBound] = status; + expectedvalues[UBound] = expect; + actualvalues[UBound] = actual; + UBound++; +} + + +function test() +{ + printBugNumber(BUGNUMBER); + printStatus(summary); + + for (var i=0; i<UBound; i++) + { + reportCompare(expectedvalues[i], actualvalues[i], statusitems[i]); + } +} |