Adding upstream version 115.7.0esr.upstream/115.7.0esrupstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/js/src/tests/non262/strict/8.7.2.js b/js/src/tests/non262/strict/8.7.2.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..76b474cd71
--- /dev/null
+++ b/js/src/tests/non262/strict/8.7.2.js
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+/* -*- indent-tabs-mode: nil; js-indent-level: 2 -*- */
+
+/*
+ * Any copyright is dedicated to the Public Domain.
+ * http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/
+ */
+
+/*
+ * These tests depend on the fact that testLenientAndStrict tries the
+ * strict case first; otherwise, the non-strict evaluation creates the
+ * variable. Ugh. Ideally, we would use evalcx, but that's not
+ * available in the browser.
+ */
+
+/* Assigning to an undeclared variable should fail in strict mode. */
+assertEq(testLenientAndStrict('undeclared=1',
+                              completesNormally,
+                              raisesException(ReferenceError)),
+         true);
+
+/*
+ * Assigning to a var-declared variable should be okay in strict and
+ * lenient modes.
+ */
+assertEq(testLenientAndStrict('var var_declared; var_declared=1',
+                              completesNormally,
+                              completesNormally),
+         true);
+
+/*
+ * We mustn't report errors until the code is actually run; the variable
+ * could be created in the mean time.
+ */
+assertEq(testLenientAndStrict('undeclared_at_compiletime=1',
+                              parsesSuccessfully,
+                              parsesSuccessfully),
+         true);
+
+function obj() {
+  var o = { x: 1, y: 1 };
+  Object.defineProperty(o, 'x', { writable: false });
+  return o;
+}
+
+/* Put EXPR in a strict mode code context with 'with' bindings in scope. */
+function in_strict_with(expr) {
+  return "with(obj()) { (function () { 'use strict'; " + expr + " })(); }";
+}
+
+assertEq(raisesException(TypeError)(in_strict_with('x = 2; y = 2;')), true);
+assertEq(raisesException(TypeError)(in_strict_with('x++;')), true);
+assertEq(raisesException(TypeError)(in_strict_with('++x;')), true);
+assertEq(raisesException(TypeError)(in_strict_with('x--;')), true);
+assertEq(raisesException(TypeError)(in_strict_with('--x;')), true);
+
+reportCompare(true, true);