From 36d22d82aa202bb199967e9512281e9a53db42c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 21:33:14 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 115.7.0esr. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- js/src/jit-test/tests/self-test/baselineCompile.js | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) create mode 100644 js/src/jit-test/tests/self-test/baselineCompile.js (limited to 'js/src/jit-test/tests/self-test/baselineCompile.js') diff --git a/js/src/jit-test/tests/self-test/baselineCompile.js b/js/src/jit-test/tests/self-test/baselineCompile.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..18da9dbf12 --- /dev/null +++ b/js/src/jit-test/tests/self-test/baselineCompile.js @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +// |jit-test| test-also=--fuzzing-safe +// Check that the help text for baselineCompile() is accurate. + +if (typeof inJit == "function" && typeof baselineCompile == "function") { + if (!inJit()) { + + var res = baselineCompile(); // compile the current script + + assertEq(inJit(), false, + "We have compiled this script to baseline jitcode, but shouldn't " + + "be running it yet, according to the help text for baselineCompile() " + + "in TestingFunctions.cpp. If you fail this assertion, nice work, and " + + "please update the help text!"); + + for (var i=0; i<1; i++) {} // exact boilerplate suggested by the help text + + assertEq(typeof res != "string" ? inJit() : true, true, + "help text in TestingFunctions.cpp claims the above loop causes " + + "the interpreter to start running the new baseline jitcode"); + } +} -- cgit v1.2.3