From 36d22d82aa202bb199967e9512281e9a53db42c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 21:33:14 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 115.7.0esr. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- .../non262/syntax/column-numbers-in-long-lines.js | 403 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 403 insertions(+) create mode 100644 js/src/tests/non262/syntax/column-numbers-in-long-lines.js (limited to 'js/src/tests/non262/syntax/column-numbers-in-long-lines.js') diff --git a/js/src/tests/non262/syntax/column-numbers-in-long-lines.js b/js/src/tests/non262/syntax/column-numbers-in-long-lines.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..56ce74f86b --- /dev/null +++ b/js/src/tests/non262/syntax/column-numbers-in-long-lines.js @@ -0,0 +1,403 @@ +// |reftest| skip-if(!this.hasOwnProperty('Reflect')||!Reflect.parse) -- uses Reflect.parse(..., { loc: true}) to trigger the column-computing API +/* + * Any copyright is dedicated to the Public Domain. + * http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ + */ + +//----------------------------------------------------------------------------- +var BUGNUMBER = 1551916; +var summary = + "Optimize computing a column number as count of code points by caching " + + "column numbers (and whether each chunk might contain anything multi-unit) " + + "and counting forward from them"; + +print(BUGNUMBER + ": " + summary); + +/************** + * BEGIN TEST * + **************/ + +// Various testing of column-number computations, with respect to counting as +// code points or units, for very long lines. +// +// This test should pass when column numbers are counts of code points (current +// behavior) or code units (past behavior). It also *should* pass for any valid +// |TokenStreamAnyChars::ColumnChunkLength| value (it must be at least 4 so that +// the maximum-length code point in UTF-8/16 will fit in a single chunk), +// because the value of that constant should be externally invisible save for +// perf effects. (As a result, recompiling and running this test with a variety +// of different values assigned to that constant is a good smoke-test of column +// number computation, that doesn't require having to closely inspect any +// column-related code.) +// +// However, this test is structured on the assumption that that constant has the +// value 128, in order to exercise in targeted fashion various column number +// computation edge cases. +// +// All this testing *could* be written to not be done with |Reflect.parse| -- +// backwards column computations happen even when compiling normal code, in some +// cases. But it's much more the exception than the rule. And |Reflect.parse| +// has *very* predictable column-computation operations (basically start/end +// coordinates are computed immediately when the end of an AST node is reached) +// that make it easier to recognize what the exact pattern of computations for +// which offsets will look like. + +// Helper function for checking node location tersely. +function checkLoc(node, expectedStart, expectedEnd) +{ + let start = node.loc.start; + + assertEq(start.line, expectedStart[0], + "start line number must be as expected"); + assertEq(start.column, expectedStart[1], + "start column number must be as expected"); + + let end = node.loc.end; + + assertEq(end.line, expectedEnd[0], "end line number must be as expected"); + assertEq(end.column, expectedEnd[1], + "end column number must be as expected"); +} + +function lengthInCodePoints(str) +{ + return [...str].length; +} + +// True if column numbers are counts of code points, false otherwise. This +// constant can be used to short-circuit testing that isn't point/unit-agnostic. +const columnsAreCodePoints = (function() +{ + var columnTypes = []; + + function checkColumn(actual, expectedPoints, expectedUnits) + { + if (actual === expectedPoints) + columnTypes.push("p"); + else if (actual === expectedUnits) + columnTypes.push("u"); + else + columnTypes.push("x"); + } + + var script = Reflect.parse('"😱😱😱😱";', { loc: true }); + assertEq(script.type, "Program"); + assertEq(script.loc.start.line, 1); + assertEq(script.loc.end.line, 1); + assertEq(script.loc.start.column, 0); + checkColumn(script.loc.end.column, 7, 11); + + var body = script.body; + assertEq(body.length, 1); + + var stmt = body[0]; + assertEq(stmt.type, "ExpressionStatement"); + assertEq(stmt.loc.start.line, 1); + assertEq(stmt.loc.end.line, 1); + assertEq(stmt.loc.start.column, 0); + checkColumn(stmt.loc.end.column, 7, 11); + + var expr = stmt.expression; + assertEq(expr.type, "Literal"); + assertEq(expr.value, "😱😱😱😱"); + assertEq(expr.loc.start.line, 1); + assertEq(expr.loc.end.line, 1); + assertEq(expr.loc.start.column, 0); + checkColumn(expr.loc.end.column, 6, 10); + + var checkResult = columnTypes.join(","); + + assertEq(checkResult === "p,p,p" || checkResult === "u,u,u", true, + "columns must be wholly code points or units: " + checkResult); + + return checkResult === "p,p,p"; +})(); + +// Start with some basic sanity-testing, without regard to exactly when, how, or +// in what order (offset => column) computations are performed. +function testSimple() +{ + if (!columnsAreCodePoints) + return; + + // Array elements within the full |simpleCode| string constructed below are + // one-element arrays containing the string "😱😱#x" where "#" is the + // character that, in C++, could be written as |'(' + i| where |i| is the + // index of the array within the outer array. + let simpleCodeArray = + [ + 'var Q = [[', // column 0, offset 0 + // REPEAT + '"😱😱(x"],["', // column 10, offset 10 + '😱😱)x"],["😱', // column 20, offset 22 + '😱*x"],["😱😱', // column 30, offset 35 + '+x"],["😱😱,', // column 40, offset 48 + 'x"],["😱😱-x', // column 50, offset 60 + '"],["😱😱.x"', // column 60, offset 72 + '],["😱😱/x"]', // column 70, offset 84 + ',["😱😱0x"],', // column 80, offset 96 + '["😱😱1x"],[', // column 90, offset 108 + // REPEAT + '"😱😱2x"],["', // column 100, offset 120 -- chunk limit between "] + '😱😱3x"],["😱', // column 110, offset 132 + '😱4x"],["😱😱', // column 120, offset 145 + '5x"],["😱😱6', // column 130, offset 158 + 'x"],["😱😱7x', // column 140, offset 170 + '"],["😱😱8x"', // column 150, offset 182 + '],["😱😱9x"]', // column 160, offset 194 + ',["😱😱:x"],', // column 170, offset 206 + '["😱😱;x"],[', // column 180, offset 218 + // REPEAT + '"😱😱x"],["😱😱', // column 210, offset 255 -- chunk limit splits first 😱 + '?x"],["😱😱@', // column 220, offset 268 + 'x"],["😱😱Ax', // column 230, offset 280 + '"],["😱😱Bx"', // column 240, offset 292 + '],["😱😱Cx"]', // column 250, offset 304 + ',["😱😱Dx"],', // column 260, offset 316 + '["😱😱Ex"],[', // column 270, offset 328 + // REPEAT + '"😱😱Fx"],["', // column 280, offset 340 + '😱😱Gx"],["😱', // column 290, offset 352 + '😱Hx"],["😱😱', // column 300, offset 365 + 'Ix"],["😱😱J', // column 310, offset 378 -- chunk limit between [" + 'x"],["😱😱Kx', // column 320, offset 390 + '"],["😱😱Lx"', // column 330, offset 402 + '],["😱😱Mx"]', // column 340, offset 414 + ',["😱😱Nx"],', // column 350, offset 426 + '["😱😱Ox"]];', // column 360 (10 long), offset 438 (+12 to end) + ]; + let simpleCode = simpleCodeArray.join(""); + + // |simpleCode| overall contains this many code points. (This number is + // chosen to be several |TokenStreamAnyChars::ColumnChunkLength = 128| chunks + // long so that long-line handling is exercised, and the relevant vector + // increased in length, for more than one chunk [which would be too short to + // trigger chunking] and for more than two chunks [so that vector extension + // will eventually occur].) + const CodePointLength = 370; + + assertEq(lengthInCodePoints(simpleCode), CodePointLength, + "code point count should be correct"); + + // |simpleCodeArray| contains this many REPEAT-delimited cycles. + const RepetitionNumber = 4; + + // Each cycle consists of this many elements. + const ElementsPerCycle = 9; + + // Each element in a cycle has at least this many 😱. + const MinFaceScreamingPerElementInCycle = 2; + + // Each cycle consists of many elements with three 😱. + const ElementsInCycleWithThreeFaceScreaming = 2; + + // Compute the overall number of UTF-16 code units. (UTF-16 because this is a + // JS string as input.) + const OverallCodeUnitCount = + CodePointLength + + RepetitionNumber * (ElementsPerCycle * MinFaceScreamingPerElementInCycle + + ElementsInCycleWithThreeFaceScreaming); + + // Code units != code points. + assertEq(OverallCodeUnitCount > CodePointLength, true, + "string contains code points outside BMP, so length in units " + + "exceeds length in points"); + + // The overall computed number of code units has this exact numeric value. + assertEq(OverallCodeUnitCount, 450, + "code unit count computation produces this value"); + + // The overall computed number of code units matches the string length. + assertEq(simpleCode.length, OverallCodeUnitCount, "string length must match"); + + // Evaluate the string. + var Q; + eval(simpleCode); + + // Verify characteristics of the resulting execution. + assertEq(Array.isArray(Q), true); + + const NumArrayElements = 40; + assertEq(Q.length, NumArrayElements); + Q.forEach((v, i) => { + assertEq(Array.isArray(v), true); + assertEq(v.length, 1); + assertEq(v[0], "😱😱" + String.fromCharCode('('.charCodeAt(0) + i) + "x"); + }); + + let parseTree = Reflect.parse(simpleCode, { loc: true }); + + // Check the overall script. + assertEq(parseTree.type, "Program"); + checkLoc(parseTree, [1, 0], [1, 370]); + assertEq(parseTree.body.length, 1); + + // Check the coordinates of the declaration. + let varDecl = parseTree.body[0]; + assertEq(varDecl.type, "VariableDeclaration"); + checkLoc(varDecl, [1, 0], [1, 369]); + + // ...and its initializing expression. + let varInit = varDecl.declarations[0].init; + assertEq(varInit.type, "ArrayExpression"); + checkLoc(varInit, [1, 8], [1, 369]); + + // ...and then every literal inside it. + assertEq(varInit.elements.length, NumArrayElements, "array literal length"); + + const ItemLength = lengthInCodePoints('["😱😱#x"],'); + assertEq(ItemLength, 9, "item length check"); + + for (let i = 0; i < NumArrayElements; i++) + { + let elem = varInit.elements[i]; + assertEq(elem.type, "ArrayExpression"); + + let startCol = 9 + i * ItemLength; + let endCol = startCol + ItemLength - 1; + checkLoc(elem, [1, startCol], [1, endCol]); + + let arrayElems = elem.elements; + assertEq(arrayElems.length, 1); + + let str = arrayElems[0]; + assertEq(str.type, "Literal"); + assertEq(str.value, + "😱😱" + String.fromCharCode('('.charCodeAt(0) + i) + "x"); + checkLoc(str, [1, startCol + 1], [1, endCol - 1]); + } +} +testSimple(); + +// Test |ChunkInfo::unitsType() == UnitsType::GuaranteedSingleUnit| -- not that +// it should be observable, precisely, but effects of mis-applying or +// miscomputing it would in principle be observable if such were happening. +// This test also is intended to to be useful for (manually, in a debugger) +// verifying that the optimization is computed and kicks in correctly. +function testGuaranteedSingleUnit() +{ + if (!columnsAreCodePoints) + return; + + // Begin a few array literals in a first chunk to test column computation in + // that first chunk. + // + // End some of them in the first chunk to test columns *before* we know we + // have a long line. + // + // End one array *outside* the first chunk to test a computation inside a + // first chunk *after* we know we have a long line and have computed a first + // chunk. + let mixedChunksCode = "var Z = [ [ [],"; // column 0, offset 0 + assertEq(mixedChunksCode.length, 15); + assertEq(lengthInCodePoints(mixedChunksCode), 15); + + mixedChunksCode += + " ".repeat(128 - mixedChunksCode.length); // column 15, offset 15 + assertEq(mixedChunksCode.length, 128); + assertEq(lengthInCodePoints(mixedChunksCode), 128); + + // Fill out a second chunk as also single-unit, with an outer array literal + // that begins in this chunk but finishes in the next (to test column + // computation in a prior, guaranteed-single-unit chunk). + mixedChunksCode += "[" + "[],".repeat(42) + " "; // column 128, offset 128 + assertEq(mixedChunksCode.length, 256); + assertEq(lengthInCodePoints(mixedChunksCode), 256); + + // Add a third chunk with one last empty nested array literal (so that we + // tack on another chunk, and conclude the second chunk is single-unit, before + // closing the enclosing array literal). Then close the enclosing array + // literal. Finally start a new string literal element containing + // multi-unit code points. For good measure, make the chunk *end* in the + // middle of such a code point, so that the relevant chunk limit must be + // retracted one code unit. + mixedChunksCode += "[] ], '" + "😱".repeat(61); // column 256, offset 256 + assertEq(mixedChunksCode.length, 384 + 1); + assertEq(lengthInCodePoints(mixedChunksCode), 324); + + // Wrap things up. Terminate the string, then terminate the nested array + // literal to trigger a column computation within the first chunk that can + // benefit from knowing the first chunk is all single-unit. Next add a *new* + // element to the outermost array, a string literal that contains a line + // terminator. The terminator invalidates the column computation cache, so + // when the outermost array is closed, location info for it will not hit the + // cache. Finally, tack on the terminating semicolon for good measure. + mixedChunksCode += "' ], '\u2028' ];"; // column 324, offset 385 + assertEq(mixedChunksCode.length, 396); + assertEq(lengthInCodePoints(mixedChunksCode), 335); + + let parseTree = Reflect.parse(mixedChunksCode, { loc: true }); + + // Check the overall script. + assertEq(parseTree.type, "Program"); + checkLoc(parseTree, [1, 0], [2, 4]); + assertEq(parseTree.body.length, 1); + + // Check the coordinates of the declaration. + let varDecl = parseTree.body[0]; + assertEq(varDecl.type, "VariableDeclaration"); + checkLoc(varDecl, [1, 0], [2, 3]); + + // ...and its initializing expression. + let varInit = varDecl.declarations[0].init; + assertEq(varInit.type, "ArrayExpression"); + checkLoc(varInit, [1, 8], [2, 3]); + + let outerArrayElements = varInit.elements; + assertEq(outerArrayElements.length, 2); + + { + // Next the first element, the array inside the initializing expression. + let nestedArray = varInit.elements[0]; + assertEq(nestedArray.type, "ArrayExpression"); + checkLoc(nestedArray, [1, 10], [1, 327]); + + // Now inside that nested array. + let nestedArrayElements = nestedArray.elements; + assertEq(nestedArrayElements.length, 3); + + // First the [] in chunk #0 + let emptyArray = nestedArrayElements[0]; + assertEq(emptyArray.type, "ArrayExpression"); + assertEq(emptyArray.elements.length, 0); + checkLoc(emptyArray, [1, 12], [1, 14]); + + // Then the big array of empty arrays starting in chunk #1 and ending just + // barely in chunk #2. + let bigArrayOfEmpties = nestedArrayElements[1]; + assertEq(bigArrayOfEmpties.type, "ArrayExpression"); + assertEq(bigArrayOfEmpties.elements.length, 42 + 1); + bigArrayOfEmpties.elements.forEach((elem, i) => { + assertEq(elem.type, "ArrayExpression"); + assertEq(elem.elements.length, 0); + if (i !== 42) + checkLoc(elem, [1, 129 + i * 3], [1, 131 + i * 3]); + else + checkLoc(elem, [1, 256], [1, 258]); // last element was hand-placed + }); + + // Then the string literal of multi-unit code points beginning in chunk #2 + // and ending just into chunk #3 on a second line. + let multiUnitStringLiteral = nestedArrayElements[2]; + assertEq(multiUnitStringLiteral.type, "Literal"); + assertEq(multiUnitStringLiteral.value, "😱".repeat(61)); + checkLoc(multiUnitStringLiteral, [1, 262], [1, 325]); + } + + { + // Finally, the string literal containing a line terminator as element in + // the outermost array. + let stringLiteralWithEmbeddedTerminator = outerArrayElements[1]; + assertEq(stringLiteralWithEmbeddedTerminator.type, "Literal"); + assertEq(stringLiteralWithEmbeddedTerminator.value, "\u2028"); + checkLoc(stringLiteralWithEmbeddedTerminator, [1, 329], [2, 1]); + } +} +testGuaranteedSingleUnit(); + +if (typeof reportCompare === "function") + reportCompare(true, true); + +print("Testing completed"); -- cgit v1.2.3