From 36d22d82aa202bb199967e9512281e9a53db42c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 21:33:14 +0200
Subject: Adding upstream version 115.7.0esr.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
---
 ...after-same-line-static-method-computed-names.js | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 js/src/tests/test262/language/statements/class/elements/after-same-line-static-method-computed-names.js

(limited to 'js/src/tests/test262/language/statements/class/elements/after-same-line-static-method-computed-names.js')

diff --git a/js/src/tests/test262/language/statements/class/elements/after-same-line-static-method-computed-names.js b/js/src/tests/test262/language/statements/class/elements/after-same-line-static-method-computed-names.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..cb60bd378a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/js/src/tests/test262/language/statements/class/elements/after-same-line-static-method-computed-names.js
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+// This file was procedurally generated from the following sources:
+// - src/class-elements/computed-names.case
+// - src/class-elements/productions/cls-decl-after-same-line-static-method.template
+/*---
+description: Computed property names (field definitions after a static method in the same line)
+esid: prod-FieldDefinition
+features: [class-fields-public, computed-property-names, class]
+flags: [generated]
+includes: [propertyHelper.js]
+info: |
+    ClassElement:
+      ...
+      FieldDefinition ;
+
+    FieldDefinition:
+      ClassElementName Initializer_opt
+
+    ClassElementName:
+      PropertyName
+
+---*/
+var x = "b";
+
+
+
+class C {
+  static m() { return 42; } [x] = 42; [10] = "meep"; ["not initialized"];
+  
+}
+
+var c = new C();
+
+assert.sameValue(C.m(), 42);
+assert(
+  !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(c, "m"),
+  "m doesn't appear as an own property on the C instance"
+);
+assert(
+  !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(C.prototype, "m"),
+  "m doesn't appear as an own property on the C prototype"
+);
+
+verifyProperty(C, "m", {
+  enumerable: false,
+  configurable: true,
+  writable: true,
+});
+
+assert(
+  !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(C.prototype, "b"),
+  "b doesn't appear as an own property on C prototype"
+);
+assert(
+  !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(C, "b"),
+  "b doesn't appear as an own property on C constructor"
+);
+
+verifyProperty(c, "b", {
+  value: 42,
+  enumerable: true,
+  writable: true,
+  configurable: true
+});
+
+assert(
+  !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(C.prototype, "x"),
+  "x doesn't appear as an own property on C prototype"
+);
+assert(
+  !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(C, "x"),
+  "x doesn't appear as an own property on C constructor"
+);
+assert(
+  !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(c, "x"),
+  "x doesn't appear as an own property on C instance"
+);
+
+assert(
+  !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(C.prototype, "10"),
+  "10 doesn't appear as an own property on C prototype"
+);
+assert(
+  !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(C, "10"),
+  "10 doesn't appear as an own property on C constructor"
+);
+
+verifyProperty(c, "10", {
+  value: "meep",
+  enumerable: true,
+  writable: true,
+  configurable: true
+});
+
+assert(
+  !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(C.prototype, "not initialized"),
+  "'not initialized' doesn't appear as an own property on C prototype"
+);
+assert(
+  !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(C, "not initialized"),
+  "'not initialized' doesn't appear as an own property on C constructor"
+);
+
+verifyProperty(c, "not initialized", {
+  value: undefined,
+  enumerable: true,
+  writable: true,
+  configurable: true
+});
+
+reportCompare(0, 0);
-- 
cgit v1.2.3