From 36d22d82aa202bb199967e9512281e9a53db42c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 21:33:14 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 115.7.0esr. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- xpcom/reflect/xptcall/md/unix/xptcinvoke_arm.cpp | 417 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 417 insertions(+) create mode 100644 xpcom/reflect/xptcall/md/unix/xptcinvoke_arm.cpp (limited to 'xpcom/reflect/xptcall/md/unix/xptcinvoke_arm.cpp') diff --git a/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/md/unix/xptcinvoke_arm.cpp b/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/md/unix/xptcinvoke_arm.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..39a6b406f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/md/unix/xptcinvoke_arm.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,417 @@ +/* -*- Mode: C; tab-width: 8; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 4 -*- */ +/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public + * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this + * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */ + +/* Platform specific code to invoke XPCOM methods on native objects */ + +#include "xptcprivate.h" + +#include "mozilla/Compiler.h" + +#if !defined(__arm__) || !(defined(LINUX) || defined(ANDROID) || defined(XP_IOS)) +#error "This code is for Linux/iOS ARM only. Check that it works on your system, too.\nBeware that this code is highly compiler dependent." +#endif + +#if MOZ_IS_GCC +#if defined(__ARM_EABI__) && !defined(__ARM_PCS_VFP) && !defined(__ARM_PCS) +#error "Can't identify floating point calling conventions.\nPlease ensure that your toolchain defines __ARM_PCS or __ARM_PCS_VFP." +#endif +#endif + +#ifndef __ARM_PCS_VFP + +/* This function copies a 64-bits word from dw to the given pointer in + * a buffer delimited by start and end, possibly wrapping around the + * buffer boundaries, and/or properly aligning the data at 64-bits word + * boundaries (for EABI). + * start and end are both assumed to be 64-bits aligned. + * Returns a pointer to the second 32-bits word copied (to accomodate + * the invoke_copy_to_stack loop). + */ +static uint32_t * +copy_double_word(uint32_t *start, uint32_t *current, uint32_t *end, uint64_t *dw) +{ +#ifdef __ARM_EABI__ + /* Aligning the pointer for EABI */ + current = (uint32_t *)(((uint32_t)current + 7) & ~7); + /* Wrap when reaching the end of the buffer */ + if (current == end) current = start; +#else + /* On non-EABI, 64-bits values are not aligned and when we reach the end + * of the buffer, we need to write half of the data at the end, and the + * other half at the beginning. */ + if (current == end - 1) { + *current = ((uint32_t*)dw)[0]; + *start = ((uint32_t*)dw)[1]; + return start; + } +#endif + + *((uint64_t*) current) = *dw; + return current + 1; +} + +/* See stack_space comment in NS_InvokeByIndex to see why this needs not to + * be static on DEBUG builds. */ +#ifndef DEBUG +static +#endif +void +invoke_copy_to_stack(uint32_t* stk, uint32_t *end, + uint32_t paramCount, nsXPTCVariant* s) +{ + /* The stack buffer is 64-bits aligned. The end argument points to its end. + * The caller is assumed to create a stack buffer of at least four 32-bits + * words. + * We use the last three 32-bit words to store the values for r1, r2 and r3 + * for the method call, i.e. the first words for arguments passing. + */ + uint32_t *d = end - 3; + for(uint32_t i = 0; i < paramCount; i++, d++, s++) + { + /* Wrap when reaching the end of the stack buffer */ + if (d == end) d = stk; + NS_ASSERTION(d >= stk && d < end, + "invoke_copy_to_stack is copying outside its given buffer"); + if(s->IsIndirect()) + { + *((void**)d) = &s->val; + continue; + } + // According to the ARM EABI, integral types that are smaller than a word + // are to be sign/zero-extended to a full word and treated as 4-byte values. + + switch(s->type) + { + case nsXPTType::T_I8 : *((int32_t*) d) = s->val.i8; break; + case nsXPTType::T_I16 : *((int32_t*) d) = s->val.i16; break; + case nsXPTType::T_I32 : *((int32_t*) d) = s->val.i32; break; + case nsXPTType::T_I64 : + d = copy_double_word(stk, d, end, (uint64_t *)&s->val.i64); + break; + case nsXPTType::T_U8 : *((uint32_t*)d) = s->val.u8; break; + case nsXPTType::T_U16 : *((uint32_t*)d) = s->val.u16; break; + case nsXPTType::T_U32 : *((uint32_t*)d) = s->val.u32; break; + case nsXPTType::T_U64 : + d = copy_double_word(stk, d, end, (uint64_t *)&s->val.u64); + break; + case nsXPTType::T_FLOAT : *((float*) d) = s->val.f; break; + case nsXPTType::T_DOUBLE : + d = copy_double_word(stk, d, end, (uint64_t *)&s->val.d); + break; + case nsXPTType::T_BOOL : *((int32_t*) d) = s->val.b; break; + case nsXPTType::T_CHAR : *((int32_t*) d) = s->val.c; break; + case nsXPTType::T_WCHAR : *((int32_t*) d) = s->val.wc; break; + default: + // all the others are plain pointer types + *((void**)d) = s->val.p; + break; + } + } +} + +typedef nsresult (*vtable_func)(nsISupports *, uint32_t, uint32_t, uint32_t); + +// Avoid AddressSanitizer instrumentation for the next function because it +// depends on __builtin_alloca behavior and alignment that cannot be relied on +// once the function is compiled with a version of ASan that has dynamic-alloca +// instrumentation enabled. + +MOZ_ASAN_IGNORE +EXPORT_XPCOM_API(nsresult) +NS_InvokeByIndex(nsISupports* that, uint32_t methodIndex, + uint32_t paramCount, nsXPTCVariant* params) +{ + +/* This is to call a given method of class that. + * The parameters are in params, the number is in paramCount. + * The routine will issue calls to count the number of words + * required for argument passing and to copy the arguments to + * the stack. + * ACPS passes the first 3 params in r1-r3 (with exceptions for 64-bits + * arguments), and the remaining goes onto the stack. + * We allocate a buffer on the stack for a "worst case" estimate of how much + * stack might be needed for EABI, i.e. twice the number of parameters. + * The end of this buffer will be used to store r1 to r3, so that the start + * of the stack is the remaining parameters. + * The magic here is to call the method with "that" and three 32-bits + * arguments corresponding to r1-r3, so that the compiler generates the + * proper function call. The stack will also contain the remaining arguments. + * + * !!! IMPORTANT !!! + * This routine makes assumptions about the vtable layout of the c++ compiler. It's implemented + * for arm-linux GNU g++ >= 2.8.1 (including egcs and gcc-2.95.[1-3])! + * + */ + + vtable_func *vtable, func; + int base_size = (paramCount > 1) ? paramCount : 2; + +/* !!! IMPORTANT !!! + * On DEBUG builds, the NS_ASSERTION used in invoke_copy_to_stack needs to use + * the stack to pass the 5th argument to NS_DebugBreak. When invoke_copy_to_stack + * is inlined, this can result, depending on the compiler and flags, in the + * stack pointer not pointing at stack_space when the method is called at the + * end of this function. More generally, any function call requiring stack + * allocation of arguments is unsafe to be inlined in this function. + */ + uint32_t *stack_space = (uint32_t *) __builtin_alloca(base_size * 8); + + invoke_copy_to_stack(stack_space, &stack_space[base_size * 2], + paramCount, params); + + vtable = *reinterpret_cast(that); + func = vtable[methodIndex]; + + return func(that, stack_space[base_size * 2 - 3], + stack_space[base_size * 2 - 2], + stack_space[base_size * 2 - 1]); +} + +#else /* __ARM_PCS_VFP */ + +/* "Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Architecture" document, sections + * "5.5 Parameter Passing" and "6.1.2 Procedure Calling" contain all the + * needed information. + * + * http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0042d/IHI0042D_aapcs.pdf + */ + +#if defined(__thumb__) && !defined(__thumb2__) +#error "Thumb1 is not supported" +#endif + +#ifndef __ARMEL__ +#error "Only little endian compatibility was tested" +#endif + +/* + * Allocation of integer function arguments initially to registers r1-r3 + * and then to stack. Handling of 'this' argument which goes to r0 registers + * is handled separately and does not belong to these two inline functions. + * + * The doubleword arguments are allocated to even:odd + * register pairs or get aligned at 8-byte boundary on stack. The "holes" + * which may appear as a result of this realignment remain unused. + * + * 'ireg_args' - pointer to the current position in the buffer, + * corresponding to the register arguments + * 'stack_args' - pointer to the current position in the buffer, + * corresponding to the arguments on stack + * 'end' - pointer to the end of the registers argument + * buffer (it is guaranteed to be 8-bytes aligned) + */ + +static inline void copy_word(uint32_t* &ireg_args, + uint32_t* &stack_args, + uint32_t* end, + uint32_t data) +{ + if (ireg_args < end) { + *ireg_args = data; + ireg_args++; + } else { + *stack_args = data; + stack_args++; + } +} + +static inline void copy_dword(uint32_t* &ireg_args, + uint32_t* &stack_args, + uint32_t* end, + uint64_t data) +{ + if (ireg_args + 1 < end) { + if ((uint32_t)ireg_args & 4) { + ireg_args++; + } + *(uint64_t *)ireg_args = data; + ireg_args += 2; + } else { + ireg_args = end; + if ((uint32_t)stack_args & 4) { + stack_args++; + } + *(uint64_t *)stack_args = data; + stack_args += 2; + } +} + +/* + * Allocation of floating point arguments to VFP registers (s0-s15, d0-d7). + * + * Unlike integer registers allocation, "back-filling" needs to be + * supported. For example, the third floating point argument in the + * following function is going to be allocated to s1 register, back-filling + * the "hole": + * void f(float s0, double d1, float s1) + * + * Refer to the "Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Architecture" document + * for more details. + * + * 'vfp_s_args' - pointer to the current position in the buffer with + * the next unallocated single precision register + * 'vfp_d_args' - pointer to the current position in the buffer with + * the next unallocated double precision register, + * it has the same value as 'vfp_s_args' when back-filling + * is not used + * 'end' - pointer to the end of the vfp registers argument + * buffer (it is guaranteed to be 8-bytes aligned) + * + * Mozilla bugtracker has a test program attached which be used for + * experimenting with VFP registers allocation code and testing its + * correctness: + * https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601914#c19 + */ + +static inline bool copy_vfp_single(float* &vfp_s_args, double* &vfp_d_args, + float* end, float data) +{ + if (vfp_s_args >= end) + return false; + + *vfp_s_args = data; + vfp_s_args++; + if (vfp_s_args < (float *)vfp_d_args) { + // It was the case of back-filling, now the next free single precision + // register should overlap with the next free double precision register + vfp_s_args = (float *)vfp_d_args; + } else if (vfp_s_args > (float *)vfp_d_args) { + // also update the pointer to the next free double precision register + vfp_d_args++; + } + return true; +} + +static inline bool copy_vfp_double(float* &vfp_s_args, double* &vfp_d_args, + float* end, double data) +{ + if (vfp_d_args >= (double *)end) { + // The back-filling continues only so long as no VFP CPRC has been + // allocated to a slot on the stack. Basically no VFP registers can + // be allocated after this point. + vfp_s_args = end; + return false; + } + + if (vfp_s_args == (float *)vfp_d_args) { + // also update the pointer to the next free single precision register + vfp_s_args += 2; + } + *vfp_d_args = data; + vfp_d_args++; + return true; +} + +static void +invoke_copy_to_stack(uint32_t* stk, uint32_t *end, + uint32_t paramCount, nsXPTCVariant* s) +{ + uint32_t *ireg_args = end - 3; + float *vfp_s_args = (float *)end; + double *vfp_d_args = (double *)end; + float *vfp_end = vfp_s_args + 16; + + for (uint32_t i = 0; i < paramCount; i++, s++) { + if (s->IsIndirect()) { + copy_word(ireg_args, stk, end, (uint32_t)&s->val); + continue; + } + // According to the ARM EABI, integral types that are smaller than a word + // are to be sign/zero-extended to a full word and treated as 4-byte values + switch (s->type) + { + case nsXPTType::T_FLOAT: + if (!copy_vfp_single(vfp_s_args, vfp_d_args, vfp_end, s->val.f)) { + copy_word(end, stk, end, reinterpret_cast(s->val.f)); + } + break; + case nsXPTType::T_DOUBLE: + if (!copy_vfp_double(vfp_s_args, vfp_d_args, vfp_end, s->val.d)) { + copy_dword(end, stk, end, reinterpret_cast(s->val.d)); + } + break; + case nsXPTType::T_I8: copy_word(ireg_args, stk, end, s->val.i8); break; + case nsXPTType::T_I16: copy_word(ireg_args, stk, end, s->val.i16); break; + case nsXPTType::T_I32: copy_word(ireg_args, stk, end, s->val.i32); break; + case nsXPTType::T_I64: copy_dword(ireg_args, stk, end, s->val.i64); break; + case nsXPTType::T_U8: copy_word(ireg_args, stk, end, s->val.u8); break; + case nsXPTType::T_U16: copy_word(ireg_args, stk, end, s->val.u16); break; + case nsXPTType::T_U32: copy_word(ireg_args, stk, end, s->val.u32); break; + case nsXPTType::T_U64: copy_dword(ireg_args, stk, end, s->val.u64); break; + case nsXPTType::T_BOOL: copy_word(ireg_args, stk, end, s->val.b); break; + case nsXPTType::T_CHAR: copy_word(ireg_args, stk, end, s->val.c); break; + case nsXPTType::T_WCHAR: copy_word(ireg_args, stk, end, s->val.wc); break; + default: + // all the others are plain pointer types + copy_word(ireg_args, stk, end, reinterpret_cast(s->val.p)); + break; + } + } +} + +typedef uint32_t (*vtable_func)(nsISupports *, uint32_t, uint32_t, uint32_t); + +EXPORT_XPCOM_API(nsresult) +NS_InvokeByIndex(nsISupports* that, uint32_t methodIndex, + uint32_t paramCount, nsXPTCVariant* params) +{ + vtable_func *vtable = *reinterpret_cast(that); + vtable_func func = vtable[methodIndex]; + // 'register uint32_t result asm("r0")' could be used here, but it does not + // seem to be reliable in all cases: http://gcc.gnu.org/PR46164 + nsresult result; + asm ( + "mov r3, sp\n" + "mov %[stack_space_size], %[param_count_plus_2], lsl #3\n" + "tst r3, #4\n" /* check stack alignment */ + + "add %[stack_space_size], #(4 * 16)\n" /* space for VFP registers */ + "mov r3, %[params]\n" + + "it ne\n" + "addne %[stack_space_size], %[stack_space_size], #4\n" + "sub r0, sp, %[stack_space_size]\n" /* allocate space on stack */ + + "sub r2, %[param_count_plus_2], #2\n" + "mov sp, r0\n" + + "add r1, r0, %[param_count_plus_2], lsl #3\n" + "blx %[invoke_copy_to_stack]\n" + + "add ip, sp, %[param_count_plus_2], lsl #3\n" + "mov r0, %[that]\n" + "ldmdb ip, {r1, r2, r3}\n" + "vldm ip, {d0, d1, d2, d3, d4, d5, d6, d7}\n" + "blx %[func]\n" + + "add sp, sp, %[stack_space_size]\n" /* cleanup stack */ + "mov %[stack_space_size], r0\n" /* it's actually 'result' variable */ + : [stack_space_size] "=&r" (result) + : [func] "r" (func), + [that] "r" (that), + [params] "r" (params), + [param_count_plus_2] "r" (paramCount + 2), + [invoke_copy_to_stack] "r" (invoke_copy_to_stack) + : "cc", "memory", + // Mark all the scratch registers as clobbered because they may be + // modified by the functions, called from this inline assembly block + "r0", "r1", "r2", "r3", "ip", "lr", + "d0", "d1", "d2", "d3", "d4", "d5", "d6", "d7", + // Also unconditionally mark d16-d31 registers as clobbered even though + // they actually don't exist in vfpv2 and vfpv3-d16 variants. There is + // no way to identify VFP variant using preprocessor at the momemnt + // (see http://gcc.gnu.org/PR46128 for more details), but fortunately + // current versions of gcc do not seem to complain about these registers + // even when this code is compiled with '-mfpu=vfpv3-d16' option. + // If gcc becomes more strict in the future and/or provides a way to + // identify VFP variant, the following d16-d31 registers list needs + // to be wrapped into some #ifdef + "d16", "d17", "d18", "d19", "d20", "d21", "d22", "d23", + "d24", "d25", "d26", "d27", "d28", "d29", "d30", "d31" + ); + return result; +} + +#endif -- cgit v1.2.3