Adding upstream version 110.0.1.upstream/110.0.1upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/dom/security/test/csp/file_bug1505412.sjs b/dom/security/test/csp/file_bug1505412.sjs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..dc7fa48b62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dom/security/test/csp/file_bug1505412.sjs
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+// https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650386
+// This SJS file serves file_redirect_content.html
+// with a CSP that will trigger a violation and that will report it
+// to file_redirect_report.sjs
+//
+// This handles 301, 302, 303 and 307 redirects. The HTTP status code
+// returned/type of redirect to do comes from the query string
+// parameter passed in from the test_bug650386_* files and then also
+// uses that value in the report-uri parameter of the CSP
+function handleRequest(request, response) {
+  response.setHeader("Cache-Control", "no-cache", false);
+
+  // this gets used in the CSP as part of the report URI.
+  var redirect = request.queryString;
+
+  if (!redirect) {
+    // if we somehow got some bogus redirect code here,
+    // do a 302 redirect to the same URL as the report URI
+    // redirects to - this will fail the test.
+    var loc =
+      "http://sub1.test1.example.org/tests/dom/security/test/csp/file_bug1505412.sjs?redirected";
+    response.setStatusLine("1.1", 302, "Found");
+    response.setHeader("Location", loc, false);
+    return;
+  }
+
+  // response.setHeader("content-type", "text/application", false);
+  // the actual file content.
+  // this image load will (intentionally) fail due to the CSP policy of default-src: 'self'
+  // specified by the CSP string above.
+  var content = "info('Script Loaded')";
+
+  response.write(content);
+
+  return;
+}