diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | devtools/shared/test-helpers/browser_allocation_tracker.js | 250 |
1 files changed, 250 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/devtools/shared/test-helpers/browser_allocation_tracker.js b/devtools/shared/test-helpers/browser_allocation_tracker.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..798a4691c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/devtools/shared/test-helpers/browser_allocation_tracker.js @@ -0,0 +1,250 @@ +/* Any copyright is dedicated to the Public Domain. + * http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ */ + +"use strict"; + +// Load the tracker in a dedicated loader using invisibleToDebugger and freshCompartment +// so that it can inspect any other module/compartment, even DevTools, chrome, +// and this script! +const { DevToolsLoader } = ChromeUtils.importESModule( + "resource://devtools/shared/loader/Loader.sys.mjs" +); +const loader = new DevToolsLoader({ + invisibleToDebugger: true, + freshCompartment: true, +}); +const { allocationTracker } = loader.require( + "chrome://mochitests/content/browser/devtools/shared/test-helpers/allocation-tracker" +); +const TrackedObjects = loader.require( + "resource://devtools/shared/test-helpers/tracked-objects.sys.mjs" +); + +// This test record multiple times complete heap snapshot, +// so that it can take a little bit to complete. +requestLongerTimeout(2); + +add_task(async function() { + // Use a sandbox to allocate test javascript object in order to avoid any + // external noise + const global = Cu.Sandbox("http://example.com"); + + const tracker = allocationTracker({ watchGlobal: global }); + const before = tracker.stillAllocatedObjects(); + + /* eslint-disable no-undef */ + // This will allocation 1001 objects. The array and 1000 elements in it. + Cu.evalInSandbox( + "let list; new " + + function() { + list = []; + for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { + list.push({}); + } + }, + global, + undefined, + "test-file.js", + 1, + /* enforceFilenameRestrictions */ false + ); + /* eslint-enable no-undef */ + + const allocations = tracker.countAllocations(); + ok( + allocations >= 1001, + `At least 1001 objects are reported as created (${allocations})` + ); + + // Uncomment this and comment the call to `countAllocations` to debug the allocations. + // The call to `countAllocations` will reset the allocation record. + // tracker.logAllocationSites(); + + const afterCreation = tracker.stillAllocatedObjects(); + is( + afterCreation.objectsWithStack - before.objectsWithStack, + 1001, + "We got exactly the expected number of objects recorded with an allocation site" + ); + ok( + afterCreation.objectsWithStack > before.objectsWithStack, + "We got some random number of objects without an allocation site" + ); + + Cu.evalInSandbox( + "list = null;", + global, + undefined, + "test-file.js", + 7, + /* enforceFilenameRestrictions */ false + ); + + Cu.forceGC(); + Cu.forceCC(); + + const afterGC = tracker.stillAllocatedObjects(); + is( + afterCreation.objectsWithStack - afterGC.objectsWithStack, + 1001, + "All the expected objects were reported freed in the count with allocation sites" + ); + ok( + afterGC.objectsWithoutStack < afterCreation.objectsWithoutStack, + "And we released some random number of objects without an allocation site" + ); + + tracker.stop(); +}); + +add_task(async function() { + const leaked = {}; + TrackedObjects.track(leaked); + let transient = {}; + TrackedObjects.track(transient); + + is(TrackedObjects.getAllNodeIds().length, 2, "The two objects are reported"); + + info("Free the transient object"); + transient = null; + Cu.forceGC(); + + is( + TrackedObjects.getAllNodeIds().length, + 1, + "We now only have the leaked object" + ); + TrackedObjects.clear(); +}); + +add_task(async function() { + info("Test start and stop recording without any debug mode"); + const tracker = allocationTracker({ watchDevToolsGlobals: true }); + await tracker.startRecordingAllocations(); + await tracker.stopRecordingAllocations(); + tracker.stop(); +}); + +add_task(async function() { + info("Test start and stop recording with 'allocations' debug mode"); + const tracker = allocationTracker({ watchDevToolsGlobals: true }); + await tracker.startRecordingAllocations("allocations"); + await tracker.stopRecordingAllocations("allocations"); + tracker.stop(); +}); + +add_task(async function() { + info("Test start and stop recording with 'leaks' debug mode"); + const tracker = allocationTracker({ watchDevToolsGlobals: true }); + await tracker.startRecordingAllocations("leaks"); + await tracker.stopRecordingAllocations("leaks"); + tracker.stop(); +}); + +add_task(async function() { + info("Test start and stop recording with tracked objects"); + + const leaked = {}; + TrackedObjects.track(leaked); + + const tracker = allocationTracker({ watchAllGlobals: true }); + await tracker.startRecordingAllocations(); + await tracker.stopRecordingAllocations(); + tracker.stop(); + + TrackedObjects.clear(); +}); + +add_task(async function() { + info("Test start and stop recording with tracked objects"); + + const sandbox = Cu.Sandbox(window); + const tracker = allocationTracker({ watchGlobal: sandbox }); + await tracker.startRecordingAllocations("leaks"); + + Cu.evalInSandbox("this.foo = {};", sandbox, null, "sandbox.js", 1); + + const record = await tracker.stopRecordingAllocations("leaks"); + is( + record.objectsWithStack, + 1, + "We get only one leaked objects, the foo object of the sandbox." + ); + ok( + record.objectsWithoutStack > 10, + "We get an handful of objects without stacks. Most likely created by Memory API itself." + ); + + is( + record.leaks.length, + 2, + "We get the one leak and the objects with missing stacks" + ); + is( + record.leaks[0].src, + "UNKNOWN", + "First item is the objects with missing stacks" + ); + // In theory the two following values should be equal, + // but they aren't always because of some dark matter around objects with missing stacks. + // `count` is computed out of `takeCensus`, while `objectsWithoutStack` uses `drainAllocationsLog` + // While the first go through the current GC graph, the second is a record of allocations over time, + // this probably explain why there is some subtle difference + ok( + record.leaks[0].count <= record.objectsWithoutStack, + "For now, the leak report intermittently assume there is less leaked objects than the summary" + ); + is(record.leaks[1].src, "sandbox.js", "Second item if about our 'foo' leak"); + is(record.leaks[1].count, 1, "We leak one object on this file"); + is(record.leaks[1].lines.length, 1, "We leak from only one line"); + is(record.leaks[1].lines[0], "1: 1", "On first line, we leak one object"); + tracker.stop(); + + TrackedObjects.clear(); +}); + +add_task(async function() { + info("Test that transient globals are not leaked"); + + const tracker = allocationTracker({ watchAllGlobals: true }); + + let sandboxBefore = Cu.Sandbox(window); + // We need to allocate at least one object from the global to reproduce the leak + Cu.evalInSandbox( + "this.foo = {};", + sandboxBefore, + null, + "sandbox-before.js", + 1 + ); + const weakBefore = Cu.getWeakReference(sandboxBefore); + sandboxBefore = null; + + await tracker.startRecordingAllocations(); + + ok( + !weakBefore.get(), + "Sandbox created before the record should have been freed by GCs done by startRecordingAllocations" + ); + + let sandboxDuring = Cu.Sandbox(window); + // We need to allocate at least one object from the global to reproduce the leak + Cu.evalInSandbox( + "this.bar = {};", + sandboxDuring, + null, + "sandbox-during.js", + 1 + ); + const weakDuring = Cu.getWeakReference(sandboxDuring); + sandboxDuring = null; + + await tracker.stopRecordingAllocations(); + + ok( + !weakDuring.get(), + "Sandbox should have been freed by GCs done by stopRecordingAllocations" + ); + + tracker.stop(); +}); |