From 43a97878ce14b72f0981164f87f2e35e14151312 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 11:22:09 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 110.0.1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- editor/docs/ChangJie.png | Bin 0 -> 544 bytes editor/docs/EditorModuleSpecificRules.rst | 215 +++++ editor/docs/EditorModuleStructure.rst | 219 ++++++ editor/docs/IMEHandlingGuide.rst | 1092 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ editor/docs/candidatewindow.png | Bin 0 -> 5667 bytes editor/docs/converted_composition_string.png | Bin 0 -> 1260 bytes editor/docs/index.rst | 12 + editor/docs/inputting_composition_string.png | Bin 0 -> 1303 bytes editor/docs/raw_composition_string.png | Bin 0 -> 1302 bytes 9 files changed, 1538 insertions(+) create mode 100644 editor/docs/ChangJie.png create mode 100644 editor/docs/EditorModuleSpecificRules.rst create mode 100644 editor/docs/EditorModuleStructure.rst create mode 100644 editor/docs/IMEHandlingGuide.rst create mode 100644 editor/docs/candidatewindow.png create mode 100644 editor/docs/converted_composition_string.png create mode 100644 editor/docs/index.rst create mode 100644 editor/docs/inputting_composition_string.png create mode 100644 editor/docs/raw_composition_string.png (limited to 'editor/docs') diff --git a/editor/docs/ChangJie.png b/editor/docs/ChangJie.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..04d872e258 Binary files /dev/null and b/editor/docs/ChangJie.png differ diff --git a/editor/docs/EditorModuleSpecificRules.rst b/editor/docs/EditorModuleSpecificRules.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..dbe4a2b12f --- /dev/null +++ b/editor/docs/EditorModuleSpecificRules.rst @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@ +############################ +Editor module specific rules +############################ + +The editor module has not been maintained aggressively about a decade. Therefore, this module needs +to be treated as a young module or in a transition period to align the behavior to the other +browsers and take modern C++ style. + +Undoubtedly, this editor module is under rewritten for modern and optimized for current specs. +Additionally, this module does really complicated things which may cause security issues. +Therefore, there are specific rules: + +Treat other browsers behavior as standard if the behavior is reasonable +======================================================================= + +The editing behavior is not standardized since as you see too many lines in the editor classes, the +number of cases which need to handle edge cases is crazy and that makes it impossible to standardize. +Additionally, our editor behavior is not so stable. Some behaviors were aligned to Internet Explorer, +some other behaviors were not for making "better" UX for users of email composer and HTML composer +which were in SeaMonkey, and the other browser engines (Blink and WebKit) have same roots but the +behavior is different from both IE and Gecko. + +Therefore, there were no reference behavior. + +In these days, compatibility between browsers becomes more important, and fortunately, the behavior +of Blink (Chrome/Chromium) which has the biggest market share is more reasonable than ours in a lot +of cases. Therefore, if we get web-compat issue reports, we should align the behavior to Blink in +theory. + +However, if Blink's behavior is also odd, this is the worst case. In this case, we should try to +align the behavior to WebKit if and only if WebKit's behavior is different from Blink and +reasonable, or doing something "better" for hiding the issue from web-apps and file an issue to the +Editing Working Group with creating a "tentative" web-platform test. + +Don't make methods of editor classes public if they are used only by helper classes +=================================================================================== + +Although this is a silly rule. Of course, APIs of editor classes need to be public for the other +modules. However, the other methods which are used only by helper classes in the editor module --the +methods may be crashed if called by the other modules because editor classes store and guarantee the +colleagues (e.g., ``Selection``) when it starts to handle an edit action (edit command or +operation)-- does not want to do it for the performance reason. Therefore, such methods are now +declared as protected methods and the caller classes are registered as friends. + +For solving this issue, we could split the editor classes one is exported and the other is not +exposed, and make the former to proxies and own the latter. However, this approach might cause +performance regressions and requires a lot of line changes (at least each method definition and +warning messages at the caller sides). Tracked in +`bug 1555916 `__. + +Steps to handle one editor command or operation +=============================================== + +One edit command or operation is called "edit action" in the editor module. Handling it starts +when an XPCOM method or a public method which is named as ``*AsAction``. Those methods create +``AutoEditActionDataSetter`` in the stack first, then, call one of ``CanHandle()``, +``CanHandleAndMaybeDispatchBeforeInputEvent()`` or ``CanHandleAndFlushPendingNotifications()``. +If ``CanHandleAndMaybeDispatchBeforeInputEvent()`` causes dispatching ``beforeinput`` event and if +the event is consumed by the web app, it returns ``NS_ERROR_EDITOR_ACTION_CANCELED``. In this case, +the method can do anything due to the ``beforeinput`` event definition. + +At this time, ``AutoEditActionDataSetter`` stores ``Selection`` etc which are required for handling +the edit action in it and set ``EditorBase::mEditActionData`` to its address. Then all methods of +editor can access the objects via the pointer (typically wrapped in inline methods) and the lifetime +of the objects are guaranteed. + +Then, the methods call one or more edit-sub action handlers. E.g., when user types a character +with a non-collapsed selection range, editor needs to delete the selected content first and insert +the character there. For implementing this behavior, "insert text" edit action handler needs to call +"delete selection" sub-action handler and "insert text" sub-action handler. The sub-edit action +handlers are named as ``*AsSubAction``. + +The callers of edit sub-action handlers or the handlers themselves create ``AutoPlaceholderBatch`` +in the stack. This creates a placeholder transaction to make all transactions undoable with one +"undo" command. + +Then, each edit sub-action handler creates ``AutoEditSubActionNotifier`` in the stack and if it's +the topmost edit sub-action handling, ``OnStartToHandleTopLevelEditSubAction()`` is called at the +creation and ``OnEndHandlingTopLevelEditSubAction()`` is called at the destruction. The latter will +clean up the modified range, e.g., remove unnecessary empty nodes. + +Finally, the edit sub-actions does something while ``AutoEditSubActionNotifier`` is alive. Helper +methods of edit sub-action handlers are typically named as ``*WithTransaction`` because they are +done with transaction classes for making everything undoable. + +Don't update Selection immediately +================================== + +Changing the ranges of ``Selection`` is expensive (due ot validating new range, notifying new +selected or unselected frames, notifying selection listeners, etc), and retrieving current +``Selection`` ranges at staring to handle something makes the code statefull which is harder to +debug when you investigate a bug. Therefore, each method should return new caret position or +update ranges given as in/out parameter of ``AutoRangeArray``. ``Result`` +is a good result type for the former, and the latter is useful style if the method needs to keep +``Selection`` similar to given ranges, e.g., when paragraphs around selection are changed to +different type of blocks. Finally, edit sub-action handler methods should update ``Selection`` +before destroying ``AutoEditSubActionNotifier`` whose post-processing requires ``Selection``. + +Don't add new things into OnEndHandlingTopLevelEditSubAction() +============================================================== + +When the topmost edit sub-action is handled, ``OnEndHandlingTopLevelEditSubAction`` is called and +it cleans up something in (or around) the modified range. However, this "post-processing" approach +makes it harder to change the behavior for fixing web-compat issues. For example, it deletes empty +nodes in the range, but if only some empty nodes are inserted intentionally, it doesn't have the +details and may unexpectedly delete necessary empty nodes. + +Instead, new things should be done immediately at or after modifying the DOM tree, and if it +requires to disable the post-processing, add new ``bool`` flag to +``EditorBase::TopLevelEditSubActionData`` and when it's set, make +``OnEndHandlingTopLevelEditSubAction`` stop doing something. + +Don't use NS_WARN_IF for checking NS_FAILED, isErr() and Failed() +================================================================= + +The warning messages like ``NS_FAILED(rv)`` does not help except the line number, and in the cases +of that we get web-compat reports, somewhere in the editor modules may get unexpected result. For +saving the investigation time of web-compat issues, each failure should warn which method call +failed, for example: + +.. code:: cpp + + nsresult rv = DoSomething(); + if (NS_FAILED(rv)) { + NS_WARNING("HTMLEditor::DoSomething() failed"); + return rv; + } + +These warnings will let you know the stack of failure in debug build. In other words, when you +investigate a web-compat issue in editor, you should do the steps to reproduce in debug build first. +Then, you'd see failure point stack in the terminal. + +Return NS_ERROR_EDITOR_DESTROYED when editor gets destroyed +=========================================================== + +The most critical error while an editor class method is running is what the editor instance is +destroyed by the web app. This can be checked with a call of ``EditorBase::Destroyed()`` and +if it returns ``true``, methods should return ``NS_ERROR_EDITOR_DESTROYED`` with stopping handling +anything. Then, all callers which handle the error result properly will stop handling too. +Finally, public methods should return ``EditorBase::ToGenericNSResult(rv)`` instead of exposing +an internal error of the editor module. + +Note that destroying the editor is intentional thing for the web app. Thus we should not throw +exception for this failure reason. Therefore, the public methods shouldn't return error. + +When you make a method return ``NS_ERROR_EDITOR_DESTROYED`` properly, you should mark the method +as ``[[nodiscard]]``. In other words, if you see ``[[nodiscard]]`` in method definition and it +returns ``nsresult`` or ``Result<*, nsresult>``, the method callers do not need to check +``Destroyed()`` by themselves. + +Use reference instead of pointer as far as possible +=================================================== + +When you create or redesign a method, it should take references instead of pointers if they take. +This rule forces that the caller to do null-check and this avoids a maybe unexpected case like: + +.. code:: cpp + + inline bool IsBRElement(const nsINode* aNode) { + return aNode && aNode->IsHTMLElement(nsGkAtoms::br); + } + + void DoSomethingExceptIfBRElement(const nsINode* aNode) { + if (IsBRElement(aNode)) { + return; + } + // Do something for non-BR element node. + } + +In this case, ``DoSomethingExceptIfBRElement`` expects that ``aNode`` is never ``nullptr`` but it +could be at least in build time. Using reference fixes this mistake at build time. + +Use ``EditorUtils`` or ``HTMLEditUtils`` for stateless methods +============================================================== + +When you create a new static method to the editor classes or a new inline method in cpp file which +defines the editor classes, please check if it's a common method which may be used from other +places in the editor module. If it's possible to be used only in ``HTMLEditor`` or its helper +classes, the method should be in ``HTMLEditUtils``. If it's possible be used in ``EditorBase`` or +``TextEditor`` or their helper classes, it should be in ``EditorUtils``. + +Don't use bool argument +======================= + +If you create a new method which take one or more ``bool`` arguments, use ``enum class`` instead +since ``true`` or ``false`` in the caller side is not easy to read. For example, you must not +be able to understand what this example mean: + +.. code:: cpp + + if (IsEmpty(aNode, true)) { + +For avoiding this issue, you should create new ``enum class`` for each. E.g., + +.. code:: cpp + + if (IsEmpty(aNode, TreatSingleBR::AsVisible)) { + +Basically, both ``enum class`` name and its value names explains what it means fluently. However, if +it's impossible, use ``No`` and ``Yes`` for the value like: + +.. code:: cpp + + if (DoSomething(aNode, OnlyIfEmpty::Yes)) { + +Don't use out parameters +======================== + +In most cases, editor methods meet error of low level APIs, thus editor methods usually return error +code. On the other hand, a lot of code need to return computed things, e.g., new caret position, +whether it's handled, ignored or canceled, a target node looked for, etc. We used ``nsresult`` for +the return value type and out parameters for the other results, but it makes callers scattering a +lot of auto variables and reusing them makes the code harder to understand. + +Now we can use ``mozilla::Result`` instead. diff --git a/editor/docs/EditorModuleStructure.rst b/editor/docs/EditorModuleStructure.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e179145a0d --- /dev/null +++ b/editor/docs/EditorModuleStructure.rst @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +####################### +Editor module structure +####################### + +This document explains the structure of the editor module and overview of classes. + +Introduction +============ + +This module implements the builtin editors of editable elements or documents, and this does **not** +implement the interface with DOM API and visual feedback of the editing UI. In other words, this +module implements DOM tree editors. + +Directories +=========== + +composer +-------- + +Previously, this directory contained "Composer" UI related code. However, currently, this +directory contains ``nsEditingSession`` and ``ComposerCommandsUpdater``. + +libeditor +--------- + +This is the main directory which contains "core" implementation of editors. + +spellchecker +------------ + +Despite of the directory name, implementation of the spellchecker is **not** here. This directory +contains only a bridge between editor classes and the spellchecker and serialized text of editable +content for spellchecking. + +txmgr +----- + +This directory contains transaction items and transaction classes. They were designed for generic +use cases, e.g., managing undo/redo of bookmarks/history of browser, etc, but they are used only by +the editor. + +Main classes +============ + +EditorBase +---------- + +``EditorBase`` class is an abstract class of editors. This inherits ``nsIEditor`` XPCOM interface, +implement common features which work with instance of classes, and exposed by +``mozilla/EditorBase.h``. + +TextEditor +---------- + +``TextEditor`` class is the implementation of plaintext editor which works with ```` and +``