From 43a97878ce14b72f0981164f87f2e35e14151312 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 11:22:09 +0200
Subject: Adding upstream version 110.0.1.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
---
 .../tests/dom/ranges/Range-extractContents.html    | 252 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 252 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 testing/web-platform/tests/dom/ranges/Range-extractContents.html

(limited to 'testing/web-platform/tests/dom/ranges/Range-extractContents.html')
diff --git a/testing/web-platform/tests/dom/ranges/Range-extractContents.html b/testing/web-platform/tests/dom/ranges/Range-extractContents.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..88f8fa55f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/web-platform/tests/dom/ranges/Range-extractContents.html
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+<!doctype html>
+<title>Range.extractContents() tests</title>
+<link rel="author" title="Aryeh Gregor" href=ayg@aryeh.name>
+<meta name=timeout content=long>
+<p>To debug test failures, add a query parameter "subtest" with the test id (like
+"?subtest=5").  Only that test will be run.  Then you can look at the resulting
+iframe in the DOM.
+<div id=log></div>
+<script src=/resources/testharness.js></script>
+<script src=/resources/testharnessreport.js></script>
+<script src=../common.js></script>
+<script>
+"use strict";
+
+testDiv.parentNode.removeChild(testDiv);
+
+var actualIframe = document.createElement("iframe");
+actualIframe.style.display = "none";
+document.body.appendChild(actualIframe);
+
+var expectedIframe = document.createElement("iframe");
+expectedIframe.style.display = "none";
+document.body.appendChild(expectedIframe);
+
+function restoreIframe(iframe, i) {
+  // Most of this function is designed to work around the fact that Opera
+  // doesn't let you add a doctype to a document that no longer has one, in
+  // any way I can figure out.  I eventually compromised on something that
+  // will still let Opera pass most tests that don't actually involve
+  // doctypes.
+  while (iframe.contentDocument.firstChild
+  && iframe.contentDocument.firstChild.nodeType != Node.DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE) {
+    iframe.contentDocument.removeChild(iframe.contentDocument.firstChild);
+  }
+
+  while (iframe.contentDocument.lastChild
+  && iframe.contentDocument.lastChild.nodeType != Node.DOCUMENT_TYPE_NODE) {
+    iframe.contentDocument.removeChild(iframe.contentDocument.lastChild);
+  }
+
+  if (!iframe.contentDocument.firstChild) {
+    // This will throw an exception in Opera if we reach here, which is why
+    // I try to avoid it.  It will never happen in a browser that obeys the
+    // spec, so it's really just insurance.  I don't think it actually gets
+    // hit by anything.
+    iframe.contentDocument.appendChild(iframe.contentDocument.implementation.createDocumentType("html", "", ""));
+  }
+  iframe.contentDocument.appendChild(referenceDoc.documentElement.cloneNode(true));
+  iframe.contentWindow.setupRangeTests();
+  iframe.contentWindow.testRangeInput = testRanges[i];
+  iframe.contentWindow.run();
+}
+
+function testExtractContents(i) {
+  restoreIframe(actualIframe, i);
+  restoreIframe(expectedIframe, i);
+
+  var actualRange = actualIframe.contentWindow.testRange;
+  var expectedRange = expectedIframe.contentWindow.testRange;
+  var actualFrag, expectedFrag;
+  var actualRoots, expectedRoots;
+
+  domTests[i].step(function() {
+    assert_equals(actualIframe.contentWindow.unexpectedException, null,
+      "Unexpected exception thrown when setting up Range for actual extractContents()");
+    assert_equals(expectedIframe.contentWindow.unexpectedException, null,
+      "Unexpected exception thrown when setting up Range for simulated extractContents()");
+    assert_equals(typeof actualRange, "object",
+      "typeof Range produced in actual iframe");
+    assert_equals(typeof expectedRange, "object",
+      "typeof Range produced in expected iframe");
+
+    // Just to be pedantic, we'll test not only that the tree we're
+    // modifying is the same in expected vs. actual, but also that all the
+    // nodes originally in it were the same.  Typically some nodes will
+    // become detached when the algorithm is run, but they still exist and
+    // references can still be kept to them, so they should also remain the
+    // same.
+    //
+    // We initialize the list to all nodes, and later on remove all the
+    // ones which still have parents, since the parents will presumably be
+    // tested for isEqualNode() and checking the children would be
+    // redundant.
+    var actualAllNodes = [];
+    var node = furthestAncestor(actualRange.startContainer);
+    do {
+      actualAllNodes.push(node);
+    } while (node = nextNode(node));
+
+    var expectedAllNodes = [];
+    var node = furthestAncestor(expectedRange.startContainer);
+    do {
+      expectedAllNodes.push(node);
+    } while (node = nextNode(node));
+
+    expectedFrag = myExtractContents(expectedRange);
+    if (typeof expectedFrag == "string") {
+      assert_throws_dom(
+        expectedFrag,
+        actualIframe.contentWindow.DOMException,
+        function() {
+          actualRange.extractContents();
+        }
+      );
+    } else {
+      actualFrag = actualRange.extractContents();
+    }
+
+    actualRoots = [];
+    for (var j = 0; j < actualAllNodes.length; j++) {
+      if (!actualAllNodes[j].parentNode) {
+        actualRoots.push(actualAllNodes[j]);
+      }
+    }
+
+    expectedRoots = [];
+    for (var j = 0; j < expectedAllNodes.length; j++) {
+      if (!expectedAllNodes[j].parentNode) {
+        expectedRoots.push(expectedAllNodes[j]);
+      }
+    }
+
+    for (var j = 0; j < actualRoots.length; j++) {
+      assertNodesEqual(actualRoots[j], expectedRoots[j], j ? "detached node #" + j : "tree root");
+
+      if (j == 0) {
+        // Clearly something is wrong if the node lists are different
+        // lengths.  We want to report this only after we've already
+        // checked the main tree for equality, though, so it doesn't
+        // mask more interesting errors.
+        assert_equals(actualRoots.length, expectedRoots.length,
+          "Actual and expected DOMs were broken up into a different number of pieces by extractContents() (this probably means you created or detached nodes when you weren't supposed to)");
+      }
+    }
+  });
+  domTests[i].done();
+
+  positionTests[i].step(function() {
+    assert_equals(actualIframe.contentWindow.unexpectedException, null,
+      "Unexpected exception thrown when setting up Range for actual extractContents()");
+    assert_equals(expectedIframe.contentWindow.unexpectedException, null,
+      "Unexpected exception thrown when setting up Range for simulated extractContents()");
+    assert_equals(typeof actualRange, "object",
+      "typeof Range produced in actual iframe");
+    assert_equals(typeof expectedRange, "object",
+      "typeof Range produced in expected iframe");
+
+    assert_true(actualRoots[0].isEqualNode(expectedRoots[0]),
+      "The resulting DOMs were not equal, so comparing positions makes no sense");
+
+    if (typeof expectedFrag == "string") {
+      // It's no longer true that, e.g., startContainer and endContainer
+      // must always be the same
+      return;
+    }
+    assert_equals(actualRange.startContainer, actualRange.endContainer,
+      "startContainer and endContainer must always be the same after extractContents()");
+    assert_equals(actualRange.startOffset, actualRange.endOffset,
+      "startOffset and endOffset must always be the same after extractContents()");
+    assert_equals(expectedRange.startContainer, expectedRange.endContainer,
+      "Test bug!  Expected startContainer and endContainer must always be the same after extractContents()");
+    assert_equals(expectedRange.startOffset, expectedRange.endOffset,
+      "Test bug!  Expected startOffset and endOffset must always be the same after extractContents()");
+
+    assert_equals(actualRange.startOffset, expectedRange.startOffset,
+      "Unexpected startOffset after extractContents()");
+    // How do we decide that the two nodes are equal, since they're in
+    // different trees?  Since the DOMs are the same, it's enough to check
+    // that the index in the parent is the same all the way up the tree.
+    // But we can first cheat by just checking they're actually equal.
+    assert_true(actualRange.startContainer.isEqualNode(expectedRange.startContainer),
+      "Unexpected startContainer after extractContents(), expected " +
+      expectedRange.startContainer.nodeName.toLowerCase() + " but got " +
+      actualRange.startContainer.nodeName.toLowerCase());
+    var currentActual = actualRange.startContainer;
+    var currentExpected = expectedRange.startContainer;
+    var actual = "";
+    var expected = "";
+    while (currentActual && currentExpected) {
+      actual = indexOf(currentActual) + "-" + actual;
+      expected = indexOf(currentExpected) + "-" + expected;
+
+      currentActual = currentActual.parentNode;
+      currentExpected = currentExpected.parentNode;
+    }
+    actual = actual.substr(0, actual.length - 1);
+    expected = expected.substr(0, expected.length - 1);
+    assert_equals(actual, expected,
+      "startContainer superficially looks right but is actually the wrong node if you trace back its index in all its ancestors (I'm surprised this actually happened");
+  });
+  positionTests[i].done();
+
+  fragTests[i].step(function() {
+    assert_equals(actualIframe.contentWindow.unexpectedException, null,
+      "Unexpected exception thrown when setting up Range for actual extractContents()");
+    assert_equals(expectedIframe.contentWindow.unexpectedException, null,
+      "Unexpected exception thrown when setting up Range for simulated extractContents()");
+    assert_equals(typeof actualRange, "object",
+      "typeof Range produced in actual iframe");
+    assert_equals(typeof expectedRange, "object",
+      "typeof Range produced in expected iframe");
+
+    if (typeof expectedFrag == "string") {
+      // Comparing makes no sense
+      return;
+    }
+    assertNodesEqual(actualFrag, expectedFrag,
+      "returned fragment");
+  });
+  fragTests[i].done();
+}
+
+// First test a detached Range, synchronously
+test(function() {
+  var range = document.createRange();
+  range.detach();
+  assert_array_equals(range.extractContents().childNodes, []);
+}, "Detached Range");
+
+var iStart = 0;
+var iStop = testRanges.length;
+
+if (/subtest=[0-9]+/.test(location.search)) {
+  var matches = /subtest=([0-9]+)/.exec(location.search);
+  iStart = Number(matches[1]);
+  iStop = Number(matches[1]) + 1;
+}
+
+var domTests = [];
+var positionTests = [];
+var fragTests = [];
+
+for (var i = iStart; i < iStop; i++) {
+  domTests[i] = async_test("Resulting DOM for range " + i + " " + testRanges[i]);
+  positionTests[i] = async_test("Resulting cursor position for range " + i + " " + testRanges[i]);
+  fragTests[i] = async_test("Returned fragment for range " + i + " " + testRanges[i]);
+}
+
+var referenceDoc = document.implementation.createHTMLDocument("");
+referenceDoc.removeChild(referenceDoc.documentElement);
+
+actualIframe.onload = function() {
+  expectedIframe.onload = function() {
+    for (var i = iStart; i < iStop; i++) {
+      testExtractContents(i);
+    }
+  }
+  expectedIframe.src = "Range-test-iframe.html";
+  referenceDoc.appendChild(actualIframe.contentDocument.documentElement.cloneNode(true));
+}
+actualIframe.src = "Range-test-iframe.html";
+</script>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

