Adding upstream version 1:2.39.2.upstream/1%2.39.2upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 246 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/t/t6016-rev-list-graph-simplify-history.sh b/t/t6016-rev-list-graph-simplify-history.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..54b0a6f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t6016-rev-list-graph-simplify-history.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+# There's more than one "correct" way to represent the history graphically.
+# These tests depend on the current behavior of the graphing code.  If the
+# graphing code is ever changed to draw the output differently, these tests
+# cases will need to be updated to know about the new layout.
+
+test_description='--graph and simplified history'
+
+GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main
+export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
+
+. ./test-lib.sh
+. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-log-graph.sh
+
+check_graph () {
+	cat >expect &&
+	lib_test_cmp_graph --format=%s "$@"
+}
+
+test_expect_success 'set up rev-list --graph test' '
+	# 3 commits on branch A
+	test_commit A1 foo.txt &&
+	test_commit A2 bar.txt &&
+	test_commit A3 bar.txt &&
+	git branch -m main A &&
+
+	# 2 commits on branch B, started from A1
+	git checkout -b B A1 &&
+	test_commit B1 foo.txt &&
+	test_commit B2 abc.txt &&
+
+	# 2 commits on branch C, started from A2
+	git checkout -b C A2 &&
+	test_commit C1 xyz.txt &&
+	test_commit C2 xyz.txt &&
+
+	# Octopus merge B and C into branch A
+	git checkout A &&
+	git merge B C -m A4 &&
+	git tag A4 &&
+
+	test_commit A5 bar.txt &&
+
+	# More commits on C, then merge C into A
+	git checkout C &&
+	test_commit C3 foo.txt &&
+	test_commit C4 bar.txt &&
+	git checkout A &&
+	git merge -s ours C -m A6 &&
+	git tag A6 &&
+
+	test_commit A7 bar.txt
+'
+
+test_expect_success '--graph --all' '
+	check_graph --all <<-\EOF
+	* A7
+	*   A6
+	|\
+	| * C4
+	| * C3
+	* | A5
+	| |
+	|  \
+	*-. | A4
+	|\ \|
+	| | * C2
+	| | * C1
+	| * | B2
+	| * | B1
+	* | | A3
+	| |/
+	|/|
+	* | A2
+	|/
+	* A1
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Make sure the graph_is_interesting() code still realizes
+# that undecorated merges are interesting, even with --simplify-by-decoration
+test_expect_success '--graph --simplify-by-decoration' '
+	git tag -d A4 &&
+	check_graph --all --simplify-by-decoration <<-\EOF
+	* A7
+	*   A6
+	|\
+	| * C4
+	| * C3
+	* | A5
+	| |
+	|  \
+	*-. | A4
+	|\ \|
+	| | * C2
+	| | * C1
+	| * | B2
+	| * | B1
+	* | | A3
+	| |/
+	|/|
+	* | A2
+	|/
+	* A1
+	EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup: get rid of decorations on B' '
+	git tag -d B2 &&
+	git tag -d B1 &&
+	git branch -d B
+'
+
+# Graph with branch B simplified away
+test_expect_success '--graph --simplify-by-decoration prune branch B' '
+	check_graph --simplify-by-decoration --all <<-\EOF
+	* A7
+	*   A6
+	|\
+	| * C4
+	| * C3
+	* | A5
+	* | A4
+	|\|
+	| * C2
+	| * C1
+	* | A3
+	|/
+	* A2
+	* A1
+	EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success '--graph --full-history -- bar.txt' '
+	check_graph --full-history --all -- bar.txt <<-\EOF
+	* A7
+	*   A6
+	|\
+	| * C4
+	* | A5
+	* | A4
+	|\|
+	* | A3
+	|/
+	* A2
+	EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success '--graph --full-history --simplify-merges -- bar.txt' '
+	check_graph --full-history --simplify-merges --all -- bar.txt <<-\EOF
+	* A7
+	*   A6
+	|\
+	| * C4
+	* | A5
+	* | A3
+	|/
+	* A2
+	EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success '--graph -- bar.txt' '
+	check_graph --all -- bar.txt <<-\EOF
+	* A7
+	* A5
+	* A3
+	| * C4
+	|/
+	* A2
+	EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success '--graph --sparse -- bar.txt' '
+	check_graph --sparse --all -- bar.txt <<-\EOF
+	* A7
+	* A6
+	* A5
+	* A4
+	* A3
+	| * C4
+	| * C3
+	| * C2
+	| * C1
+	|/
+	* A2
+	* A1
+	EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success '--graph ^C4' '
+	check_graph --all ^C4 <<-\EOF
+	* A7
+	* A6
+	* A5
+	*   A4
+	|\
+	| * B2
+	| * B1
+	* A3
+	EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success '--graph ^C3' '
+	check_graph --all ^C3 <<-\EOF
+	* A7
+	*   A6
+	|\
+	| * C4
+	* A5
+	*   A4
+	|\
+	| * B2
+	| * B1
+	* A3
+	EOF
+'
+
+# I don't think the ordering of the boundary commits is really
+# that important, but this test depends on it.  If the ordering ever changes
+# in the code, we'll need to update this test.
+test_expect_success '--graph --boundary ^C3' '
+	check_graph --boundary --all ^C3 <<-\EOF
+	* A7
+	*   A6
+	|\
+	| * C4
+	* | A5
+	| |
+	|  \
+	*-. \   A4
+	|\ \ \
+	| * | | B2
+	| * | | B1
+	* | | | A3
+	o | | | A2
+	|/ / /
+	o / / A1
+	 / /
+	| o C3
+	|/
+	o C2
+	EOF
+'
+
+test_done