diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
30 files changed, 9360 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/.gitignore b/Documentation/technical/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8aa891d --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +api-index.txt diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-error-handling.txt b/Documentation/technical/api-error-handling.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..665c496 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/api-error-handling.txt @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +Error reporting in git +====================== + +`BUG`, `bug`, `die`, `usage`, `error`, and `warning` report errors of +various kinds. + +- `BUG` is for failed internal assertions that should never happen, + i.e. a bug in git itself. + +- `bug` (lower-case, not `BUG`) is supposed to be used like `BUG` but + prints a "BUG" message instead of calling `abort()`. ++ +A call to `bug()` will then result in a "real" call to the `BUG()` +function, either explicitly by invoking `BUG_if_bug()` after call(s) +to `bug()`, or implicitly at `exit()` time where we'll check if we +encountered any outstanding `bug()` invocations. ++ +If there were no prior calls to `bug()` before invoking `BUG_if_bug()` +the latter is a NOOP. The `BUG_if_bug()` function takes the same +arguments as `BUG()` itself. Calling `BUG_if_bug()` explicitly isn't +necessary, but ensures that we die as soon as possible. ++ +If you know you had prior calls to `bug()` then calling `BUG()` itself +is equivalent to calling `BUG_if_bug()`, the latter being a wrapper +calling `BUG()` if we've set a flag indicating that we've called +`bug()`. ++ +This is for the convenience of APIs who'd like to potentially report +more than one "bug", such as the optbug() validation in +parse-options.c. + +- `die` is for fatal application errors. It prints a message to + the user and exits with status 128. + +- `usage` is for errors in command line usage. After printing its + message, it exits with status 129. (See also `usage_with_options` + in the link:api-parse-options.html[parse-options API].) + +- `error` is for non-fatal library errors. It prints a message + to the user and returns -1 for convenience in signaling the error + to the caller. + +- `warning` is for reporting situations that probably should not + occur but which the user (and Git) can continue to work around + without running into too many problems. Like `error`, it + returns -1 after reporting the situation to the caller. + +These reports will be logged via the trace2 facility. See the "error" +event in link:api-trace2.html[trace2 API]. + +Customizable error handlers +--------------------------- + +The default behavior of `die` and `error` is to write a message to +stderr and then exit or return as appropriate. This behavior can be +overridden using `set_die_routine` and `set_error_routine`. For +example, "git daemon" uses set_die_routine to write the reason `die` +was called to syslog before exiting. + +Library errors +-------------- + +Functions return a negative integer on error. Details beyond that +vary from function to function: + +- Some functions return -1 for all errors. Others return a more + specific value depending on how the caller might want to react + to the error. + +- Some functions report the error to stderr with `error`, + while others leave that for the caller to do. + +- errno is not meaningful on return from most functions (except + for thin wrappers for system calls). + +Check the function's API documentation to be sure. + +Caller-handled errors +--------------------- + +An increasing number of functions take a parameter 'struct strbuf *err'. +On error, such functions append a message about what went wrong to the +'err' strbuf. The message is meant to be complete enough to be passed +to `die` or `error` as-is. For example: + + if (ref_transaction_commit(transaction, &err)) + die("%s", err.buf); + +The 'err' parameter will be untouched if no error occurred, so multiple +function calls can be chained: + + t = ref_transaction_begin(&err); + if (!t || + ref_transaction_update(t, "HEAD", ..., &err) || + ret_transaction_commit(t, &err)) + die("%s", err.buf); + +The 'err' parameter must be a pointer to a valid strbuf. To silence +a message, pass a strbuf that is explicitly ignored: + + if (thing_that_can_fail_in_an_ignorable_way(..., &err)) + /* This failure is okay. */ + strbuf_reset(&err); diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-index-skel.txt b/Documentation/technical/api-index-skel.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..eda8c19 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/api-index-skel.txt @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +Git API Documents +================= + +Git has grown a set of internal API over time. This collection +documents them. + +//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +// table of contents begin +//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// + +//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// +// table of contents end +//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-index.sh b/Documentation/technical/api-index.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..9c3f413 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/api-index.sh @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +( + c=//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// + skel=api-index-skel.txt + sed -e '/^\/\/ table of contents begin/q' "$skel" + echo "$c" + + ls api-*.txt | + while read filename + do + case "$filename" in + api-index-skel.txt | api-index.txt) continue ;; + esac + title=$(sed -e 1q "$filename") + html=${filename%.txt}.html + echo "* link:$html[$title]" + done + echo "$c" + sed -n -e '/^\/\/ table of contents end/,$p' "$skel" +) >api-index.txt+ + +if test -f api-index.txt && cmp api-index.txt api-index.txt+ >/dev/null +then + rm -f api-index.txt+ +else + mv api-index.txt+ api-index.txt +fi diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-merge.txt b/Documentation/technical/api-merge.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..487d4d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/api-merge.txt @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +merge API +========= + +The merge API helps a program to reconcile two competing sets of +improvements to some files (e.g., unregistered changes from the work +tree versus changes involved in switching to a new branch), reporting +conflicts if found. The library called through this API is +responsible for a few things. + + * determining which trees to merge (recursive ancestor consolidation); + + * lining up corresponding files in the trees to be merged (rename + detection, subtree shifting), reporting edge cases like add/add + and rename/rename conflicts to the user; + + * performing a three-way merge of corresponding files, taking + path-specific merge drivers (specified in `.gitattributes`) + into account. + +Data structures +--------------- + +* `mmbuffer_t`, `mmfile_t` + +These store data usable for use by the xdiff backend, for writing and +for reading, respectively. See `xdiff/xdiff.h` for the definitions +and `diff.c` for examples. + +* `struct ll_merge_options` + +Check ll-merge.h for details. + +Low-level (single file) merge +----------------------------- + +Check ll-merge.h for details. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt b/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..61fa6ee --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/api-parse-options.txt @@ -0,0 +1,349 @@ +parse-options API +================= + +The parse-options API is used to parse and massage options in Git +and to provide a usage help with consistent look. + +Basics +------ + +The argument vector `argv[]` may usually contain mandatory or optional +'non-option arguments', e.g. a filename or a branch, 'options', and +'subcommands'. +Options are optional arguments that start with a dash and +that allow to change the behavior of a command. + +* There are basically three types of options: + 'boolean' options, + options with (mandatory) 'arguments' and + options with 'optional arguments' + (i.e. a boolean option that can be adjusted). + +* There are basically two forms of options: + 'Short options' consist of one dash (`-`) and one alphanumeric + character. + 'Long options' begin with two dashes (`--`) and some + alphanumeric characters. + +* Options are case-sensitive. + Please define 'lower-case long options' only. + +The parse-options API allows: + +* 'stuck' and 'separate form' of options with arguments. + `-oArg` is stuck, `-o Arg` is separate form. + `--option=Arg` is stuck, `--option Arg` is separate form. + +* Long options may be 'abbreviated', as long as the abbreviation + is unambiguous. + +* Short options may be bundled, e.g. `-a -b` can be specified as `-ab`. + +* Boolean long options can be 'negated' (or 'unset') by prepending + `no-`, e.g. `--no-abbrev` instead of `--abbrev`. Conversely, + options that begin with `no-` can be 'negated' by removing it. + Other long options can be unset (e.g., set string to NULL, set + integer to 0) by prepending `no-`. + +* Options and non-option arguments can clearly be separated using the `--` + option, e.g. `-a -b --option -- --this-is-a-file` indicates that + `--this-is-a-file` must not be processed as an option. + +Subcommands are special in a couple of ways: + +* Subcommands only have long form, and they have no double dash prefix, no + negated form, and no description, and they don't take any arguments, and + can't be abbreviated. + +* There must be exactly one subcommand among the arguments, or zero if the + command has a default operation mode. + +* All arguments following the subcommand are considered to be arguments of + the subcommand, and, conversely, arguments meant for the subcommand may + not precede the subcommand. + +Therefore, if the options array contains at least one subcommand and +`parse_options()` encounters the first dashless argument, it will either: + +* stop and return, if that dashless argument is a known subcommand, setting + `value` to the function pointer associated with that subcommand, storing + the name of the subcommand in argv[0], and leaving the rest of the + arguments unprocessed, or + +* stop and return, if it was invoked with the `PARSE_OPT_SUBCOMMAND_OPTIONAL` + flag and that dashless argument doesn't match any subcommands, leaving + `value` unchanged and the rest of the arguments unprocessed, or + +* show error and usage, and abort. + +Steps to parse options +---------------------- + +. `#include "parse-options.h"` + +. define a NULL-terminated + `static const char * const builtin_foo_usage[]` array + containing alternative usage strings + +. define `builtin_foo_options` array as described below + in section 'Data Structure'. + +. in `cmd_foo(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)` + call + + argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, builtin_foo_options, builtin_foo_usage, flags); ++ +`parse_options()` will filter out the processed options of `argv[]` and leave the +non-option arguments in `argv[]`. +`argc` is updated appropriately because of the assignment. ++ +You can also pass NULL instead of a usage array as the fifth parameter of +parse_options(), to avoid displaying a help screen with usage info and +option list. This should only be done if necessary, e.g. to implement +a limited parser for only a subset of the options that needs to be run +before the full parser, which in turn shows the full help message. ++ +Flags are the bitwise-or of: + +`PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH`:: + Keep the `--` that usually separates options from + non-option arguments. + +`PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION`:: + Usually the whole argument vector is massaged and reordered. + Using this flag, processing is stopped at the first non-option + argument. + +`PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0`:: + Keep the first argument, which contains the program name. It's + removed from argv[] by default. + +`PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN_OPT`:: + Keep unknown options instead of erroring out. This doesn't + work for all combinations of arguments as users might expect + it to do. E.g. if the first argument in `--unknown --known` + takes a value (which we can't know), the second one is + mistakenly interpreted as a known option. Similarly, if + `PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION` is set, the second argument in + `--unknown value` will be mistakenly interpreted as a + non-option, not as a value belonging to the unknown option, + the parser early. That's why parse_options() errors out if + both options are set. + Note that non-option arguments are always kept, even without + this flag. + +`PARSE_OPT_NO_INTERNAL_HELP`:: + By default, parse_options() handles `-h`, `--help` and + `--help-all` internally, by showing a help screen. This option + turns it off and allows one to add custom handlers for these + options, or to just leave them unknown. + +`PARSE_OPT_SUBCOMMAND_OPTIONAL`:: + Don't error out when no subcommand is specified. + +Note that `PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION` is incompatible with subcommands; +while `PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH` and `PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN_OPT` can only be +used with subcommands when combined with `PARSE_OPT_SUBCOMMAND_OPTIONAL`. + +Data Structure +-------------- + +The main data structure is an array of the `option` struct, +say `static struct option builtin_add_options[]`. +There are some macros to easily define options: + +`OPT__ABBREV(&int_var)`:: + Add `--abbrev[=<n>]`. + +`OPT__COLOR(&int_var, description)`:: + Add `--color[=<when>]` and `--no-color`. + +`OPT__DRY_RUN(&int_var, description)`:: + Add `-n, --dry-run`. + +`OPT__FORCE(&int_var, description)`:: + Add `-f, --force`. + +`OPT__QUIET(&int_var, description)`:: + Add `-q, --quiet`. + +`OPT__VERBOSE(&int_var, description)`:: + Add `-v, --verbose`. + +`OPT_GROUP(description)`:: + Start an option group. `description` is a short string that + describes the group or an empty string. + Start the description with an upper-case letter. + +`OPT_BOOL(short, long, &int_var, description)`:: + Introduce a boolean option. `int_var` is set to one with + `--option` and set to zero with `--no-option`. + +`OPT_COUNTUP(short, long, &int_var, description)`:: + Introduce a count-up option. + Each use of `--option` increments `int_var`, starting from zero + (even if initially negative), and `--no-option` resets it to + zero. To determine if `--option` or `--no-option` was encountered at + all, initialize `int_var` to a negative value, and if it is still + negative after parse_options(), then neither `--option` nor + `--no-option` was seen. + +`OPT_BIT(short, long, &int_var, description, mask)`:: + Introduce a boolean option. + If used, `int_var` is bitwise-ored with `mask`. + +`OPT_NEGBIT(short, long, &int_var, description, mask)`:: + Introduce a boolean option. + If used, `int_var` is bitwise-anded with the inverted `mask`. + +`OPT_SET_INT(short, long, &int_var, description, integer)`:: + Introduce an integer option. + `int_var` is set to `integer` with `--option`, and + reset to zero with `--no-option`. + +`OPT_STRING(short, long, &str_var, arg_str, description)`:: + Introduce an option with string argument. + The string argument is put into `str_var`. + +`OPT_STRING_LIST(short, long, &struct string_list, arg_str, description)`:: + Introduce an option with string argument. + The string argument is stored as an element in `string_list`. + Use of `--no-option` will clear the list of preceding values. + +`OPT_INTEGER(short, long, &int_var, description)`:: + Introduce an option with integer argument. + The integer is put into `int_var`. + +`OPT_MAGNITUDE(short, long, &unsigned_long_var, description)`:: + Introduce an option with a size argument. The argument must be a + non-negative integer and may include a suffix of 'k', 'm' or 'g' to + scale the provided value by 1024, 1024^2 or 1024^3 respectively. + The scaled value is put into `unsigned_long_var`. + +`OPT_EXPIRY_DATE(short, long, ×tamp_t_var, description)`:: + Introduce an option with expiry date argument, see `parse_expiry_date()`. + The timestamp is put into `timestamp_t_var`. + +`OPT_CALLBACK(short, long, &var, arg_str, description, func_ptr)`:: + Introduce an option with argument. + The argument will be fed into the function given by `func_ptr` + and the result will be put into `var`. + See 'Option Callbacks' below for a more elaborate description. + +`OPT_FILENAME(short, long, &var, description)`:: + Introduce an option with a filename argument. + The filename will be prefixed by passing the filename along with + the prefix argument of `parse_options()` to `prefix_filename()`. + +`OPT_NUMBER_CALLBACK(&var, description, func_ptr)`:: + Recognize numerical options like -123 and feed the integer as + if it was an argument to the function given by `func_ptr`. + The result will be put into `var`. There can be only one such + option definition. It cannot be negated and it takes no + arguments. Short options that happen to be digits take + precedence over it. + +`OPT_COLOR_FLAG(short, long, &int_var, description)`:: + Introduce an option that takes an optional argument that can + have one of three values: "always", "never", or "auto". If the + argument is not given, it defaults to "always". The `--no-` form + works like `--long=never`; it cannot take an argument. If + "always", set `int_var` to 1; if "never", set `int_var` to 0; if + "auto", set `int_var` to 1 if stdout is a tty or a pager, + 0 otherwise. + +`OPT_NOOP_NOARG(short, long)`:: + Introduce an option that has no effect and takes no arguments. + Use it to hide deprecated options that are still to be recognized + and ignored silently. + +`OPT_PASSTHRU(short, long, &char_var, arg_str, description, flags)`:: + Introduce an option that will be reconstructed into a char* string, + which must be initialized to NULL. This is useful when you need to + pass the command-line option to another command. Any previous value + will be overwritten, so this should only be used for options where + the last one specified on the command line wins. + +`OPT_PASSTHRU_ARGV(short, long, &strvec_var, arg_str, description, flags)`:: + Introduce an option where all instances of it on the command-line will + be reconstructed into a strvec. This is useful when you need to + pass the command-line option, which can be specified multiple times, + to another command. + +`OPT_CMDMODE(short, long, &int_var, description, enum_val)`:: + Define an "operation mode" option, only one of which in the same + group of "operating mode" options that share the same `int_var` + can be given by the user. `int_var` is set to `enum_val` when the + option is used, but an error is reported if other "operating mode" + option has already set its value to the same `int_var`. + In new commands consider using subcommands instead. + +`OPT_SUBCOMMAND(long, &fn_ptr, subcommand_fn)`:: + Define a subcommand. `subcommand_fn` is put into `fn_ptr` when + this subcommand is used. + +The last element of the array must be `OPT_END()`. + +If not stated otherwise, interpret the arguments as follows: + +* `short` is a character for the short option + (e.g. `'e'` for `-e`, use `0` to omit), + +* `long` is a string for the long option + (e.g. `"example"` for `--example`, use `NULL` to omit), + +* `int_var` is an integer variable, + +* `str_var` is a string variable (`char *`), + +* `arg_str` is the string that is shown as argument + (e.g. `"branch"` will result in `<branch>`). + If set to `NULL`, three dots (`...`) will be displayed. + +* `description` is a short string to describe the effect of the option. + It shall begin with a lower-case letter and a full stop (`.`) shall be + omitted at the end. + +Option Callbacks +---------------- + +The function must be defined in this form: + + int func(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset) + +The callback mechanism is as follows: + +* Inside `func`, the only interesting member of the structure + given by `opt` is the void pointer `opt->value`. + `*opt->value` will be the value that is saved into `var`, if you + use `OPT_CALLBACK()`. + For example, do `*(unsigned long *)opt->value = 42;` to get 42 + into an `unsigned long` variable. + +* Return value `0` indicates success and non-zero return + value will invoke `usage_with_options()` and, thus, die. + +* If the user negates the option, `arg` is `NULL` and `unset` is 1. + +Sophisticated option parsing +---------------------------- + +If you need, for example, option callbacks with optional arguments +or without arguments at all, or if you need other special cases, +that are not handled by the macros above, you need to specify the +members of the `option` structure manually. + +This is not covered in this document, but well documented +in `parse-options.h` itself. + +Examples +-------- + +See `test-parse-options.c` and +`builtin/add.c`, +`builtin/clone.c`, +`builtin/commit.c`, +`builtin/fetch.c`, +`builtin/fsck.c`, +`builtin/rm.c` +for real-world examples. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-simple-ipc.txt b/Documentation/technical/api-simple-ipc.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d44ada9 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/api-simple-ipc.txt @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +Simple-IPC API +============== + +The Simple-IPC API is a collection of `ipc_` prefixed library routines +and a basic communication protocol that allow an IPC-client process to +send an application-specific IPC-request message to an IPC-server +process and receive an application-specific IPC-response message. + +Communication occurs over a named pipe on Windows and a Unix domain +socket on other platforms. IPC-clients and IPC-servers rendezvous at +a previously agreed-to application-specific pathname (which is outside +the scope of this design) that is local to the computer system. + +The IPC-server routines within the server application process create a +thread pool to listen for connections and receive request messages +from multiple concurrent IPC-clients. When received, these messages +are dispatched up to the server application callbacks for handling. +IPC-server routines then incrementally relay responses back to the +IPC-client. + +The IPC-client routines within a client application process connect +to the IPC-server and send a request message and wait for a response. +When received, the response is returned back the caller. + +For example, the `fsmonitor--daemon` feature will be built as a server +application on top of the IPC-server library routines. It will have +threads watching for file system events and a thread pool waiting for +client connections. Clients, such as `git status` will request a list +of file system events since a point in time and the server will +respond with a list of changed files and directories. The formats of +the request and response are application-specific; the IPC-client and +IPC-server routines treat them as opaque byte streams. + + +Comparison with sub-process model +--------------------------------- + +The Simple-IPC mechanism differs from the existing `sub-process.c` +model (Documentation/technical/long-running-process-protocol.txt) and +used by applications like Git-LFS. In the LFS-style sub-process model +the helper is started by the foreground process, communication happens +via a pair of file descriptors bound to the stdin/stdout of the +sub-process, the sub-process only serves the current foreground +process, and the sub-process exits when the foreground process +terminates. + +In the Simple-IPC model the server is a very long-running service. It +can service many clients at the same time and has a private socket or +named pipe connection to each active client. It might be started +(on-demand) by the current client process or it might have been +started by a previous client or by the OS at boot time. The server +process is not associated with a terminal and it persists after +clients terminate. Clients do not have access to the stdin/stdout of +the server process and therefore must communicate over sockets or +named pipes. + + +Server startup and shutdown +--------------------------- + +How an application server based upon IPC-server is started is also +outside the scope of the Simple-IPC design and is a property of the +application using it. For example, the server might be started or +restarted during routine maintenance operations, or it might be +started as a system service during the system boot-up sequence, or it +might be started on-demand by a foreground Git command when needed. + +Similarly, server shutdown is a property of the application using +the simple-ipc routines. For example, the server might decide to +shutdown when idle or only upon explicit request. + + +Simple-IPC protocol +------------------- + +The Simple-IPC protocol consists of a single request message from the +client and an optional response message from the server. Both the +client and server messages are unlimited in length and are terminated +with a flush packet. + +The pkt-line routines (linkgit:gitprotocol-common[5]) +are used to simplify buffer management during message generation, +transmission, and reception. A flush packet is used to mark the end +of the message. This allows the sender to incrementally generate and +transmit the message. It allows the receiver to incrementally receive +the message in chunks and to know when they have received the entire +message. + +The actual byte format of the client request and server response +messages are application specific. The IPC layer transmits and +receives them as opaque byte buffers without any concern for the +content within. It is the job of the calling application layer to +understand the contents of the request and response messages. + + +Summary +------- + +Conceptually, the Simple-IPC protocol is similar to an HTTP REST +request. Clients connect, make an application-specific and +stateless request, receive an application-specific +response, and disconnect. It is a one round trip facility for +querying the server. The Simple-IPC routines hide the socket, +named pipe, and thread pool details and allow the application +layer to focus on the application at hand. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-trace2.txt b/Documentation/technical/api-trace2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..de5fc25 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/api-trace2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1339 @@ += Trace2 API + +The Trace2 API can be used to print debug, performance, and telemetry +information to stderr or a file. The Trace2 feature is inactive unless +explicitly enabled by enabling one or more Trace2 Targets. + +The Trace2 API is intended to replace the existing (Trace1) +`printf()`-style tracing provided by the existing `GIT_TRACE` and +`GIT_TRACE_PERFORMANCE` facilities. During initial implementation, +Trace2 and Trace1 may operate in parallel. + +The Trace2 API defines a set of high-level messages with known fields, +such as (`start`: `argv`) and (`exit`: {`exit-code`, `elapsed-time`}). + +Trace2 instrumentation throughout the Git code base sends Trace2 +messages to the enabled Trace2 Targets. Targets transform these +messages content into purpose-specific formats and write events to +their data streams. In this manner, the Trace2 API can drive +many different types of analysis. + +Targets are defined using a VTable allowing easy extension to other +formats in the future. This might be used to define a binary format, +for example. + +Trace2 is controlled using `trace2.*` config values in the system and +global config files and `GIT_TRACE2*` environment variables. Trace2 does +not read from repo local or worktree config files, nor does it respect +`-c` command line config settings. + +== Trace2 Targets + +Trace2 defines the following set of Trace2 Targets. +Format details are given in a later section. + +=== The Normal Format Target + +The normal format target is a traditional `printf()` format and similar +to the `GIT_TRACE` format. This format is enabled with the `GIT_TRACE2` +environment variable or the `trace2.normalTarget` system or global +config setting. + +For example + +------------ +$ export GIT_TRACE2=~/log.normal +$ git version +git version 2.20.1.155.g426c96fcdb +------------ + +or + +------------ +$ git config --global trace2.normalTarget ~/log.normal +$ git version +git version 2.20.1.155.g426c96fcdb +------------ + +yields + +------------ +$ cat ~/log.normal +12:28:42.620009 common-main.c:38 version 2.20.1.155.g426c96fcdb +12:28:42.620989 common-main.c:39 start git version +12:28:42.621101 git.c:432 cmd_name version (version) +12:28:42.621215 git.c:662 exit elapsed:0.001227 code:0 +12:28:42.621250 trace2/tr2_tgt_normal.c:124 atexit elapsed:0.001265 code:0 +------------ + +=== The Performance Format Target + +The performance format target (PERF) is a column-based format to +replace `GIT_TRACE_PERFORMANCE` and is suitable for development and +testing, possibly to complement tools like `gprof`. This format is +enabled with the `GIT_TRACE2_PERF` environment variable or the +`trace2.perfTarget` system or global config setting. + +For example + +------------ +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF=~/log.perf +$ git version +git version 2.20.1.155.g426c96fcdb +------------ + +or + +------------ +$ git config --global trace2.perfTarget ~/log.perf +$ git version +git version 2.20.1.155.g426c96fcdb +------------ + +yields + +------------ +$ cat ~/log.perf +12:28:42.620675 common-main.c:38 | d0 | main | version | | | | | 2.20.1.155.g426c96fcdb +12:28:42.621001 common-main.c:39 | d0 | main | start | | 0.001173 | | | git version +12:28:42.621111 git.c:432 | d0 | main | cmd_name | | | | | version (version) +12:28:42.621225 git.c:662 | d0 | main | exit | | 0.001227 | | | code:0 +12:28:42.621259 trace2/tr2_tgt_perf.c:211 | d0 | main | atexit | | 0.001265 | | | code:0 +------------ + +=== The Event Format Target + +The event format target is a JSON-based format of event data suitable +for telemetry analysis. This format is enabled with the `GIT_TRACE2_EVENT` +environment variable or the `trace2.eventTarget` system or global config +setting. + +For example + +------------ +$ export GIT_TRACE2_EVENT=~/log.event +$ git version +git version 2.20.1.155.g426c96fcdb +------------ + +or + +------------ +$ git config --global trace2.eventTarget ~/log.event +$ git version +git version 2.20.1.155.g426c96fcdb +------------ + +yields + +------------ +$ cat ~/log.event +{"event":"version","sid":"20190408T191610.507018Z-H9b68c35f-P000059a8","thread":"main","time":"2019-01-16T17:28:42.620713Z","file":"common-main.c","line":38,"evt":"3","exe":"2.20.1.155.g426c96fcdb"} +{"event":"start","sid":"20190408T191610.507018Z-H9b68c35f-P000059a8","thread":"main","time":"2019-01-16T17:28:42.621027Z","file":"common-main.c","line":39,"t_abs":0.001173,"argv":["git","version"]} +{"event":"cmd_name","sid":"20190408T191610.507018Z-H9b68c35f-P000059a8","thread":"main","time":"2019-01-16T17:28:42.621122Z","file":"git.c","line":432,"name":"version","hierarchy":"version"} +{"event":"exit","sid":"20190408T191610.507018Z-H9b68c35f-P000059a8","thread":"main","time":"2019-01-16T17:28:42.621236Z","file":"git.c","line":662,"t_abs":0.001227,"code":0} +{"event":"atexit","sid":"20190408T191610.507018Z-H9b68c35f-P000059a8","thread":"main","time":"2019-01-16T17:28:42.621268Z","file":"trace2/tr2_tgt_event.c","line":163,"t_abs":0.001265,"code":0} +------------ + +=== Enabling a Target + +To enable a target, set the corresponding environment variable or +system or global config value to one of the following: + +include::../trace2-target-values.txt[] + +When trace files are written to a target directory, they will be named according +to the last component of the SID (optionally followed by a counter to avoid +filename collisions). + +== Trace2 API + +The Trace2 public API is defined and documented in `trace2.h`; refer to it for +more information. All public functions and macros are prefixed +with `trace2_` and are implemented in `trace2.c`. + +There are no public Trace2 data structures. + +The Trace2 code also defines a set of private functions and data types +in the `trace2/` directory. These symbols are prefixed with `tr2_` +and should only be used by functions in `trace2.c` (or other private +source files in `trace2/`). + +=== Conventions for Public Functions and Macros + +Some functions have a `_fl()` suffix to indicate that they take `file` +and `line-number` arguments. + +Some functions have a `_va_fl()` suffix to indicate that they also +take a `va_list` argument. + +Some functions have a `_printf_fl()` suffix to indicate that they also +take a `printf()` style format with a variable number of arguments. + +CPP wrapper macros are defined to hide most of these details. + +== Trace2 Target Formats + +=== NORMAL Format + +Events are written as lines of the form: + +------------ +[<time> SP <filename>:<line> SP+] <event-name> [[SP] <event-message>] LF +------------ + +`<event-name>`:: + + is the event name. + +`<event-message>`:: + is a free-form `printf()` message intended for human consumption. ++ +Note that this may contain embedded LF or CRLF characters that are +not escaped, so the event may spill across multiple lines. + +If `GIT_TRACE2_BRIEF` or `trace2.normalBrief` is true, the `time`, `filename`, +and `line` fields are omitted. + +This target is intended to be more of a summary (like GIT_TRACE) and +less detailed than the other targets. It ignores thread, region, and +data messages, for example. + +=== PERF Format + +Events are written as lines of the form: + +------------ +[<time> SP <filename>:<line> SP+ + BAR SP] d<depth> SP + BAR SP <thread-name> SP+ + BAR SP <event-name> SP+ + BAR SP [r<repo-id>] SP+ + BAR SP [<t_abs>] SP+ + BAR SP [<t_rel>] SP+ + BAR SP [<category>] SP+ + BAR SP DOTS* <perf-event-message> + LF +------------ + +`<depth>`:: + is the git process depth. This is the number of parent + git processes. A top-level git command has depth value "d0". + A child of it has depth value "d1". A second level child + has depth value "d2" and so on. + +`<thread-name>`:: + is a unique name for the thread. The primary thread + is called "main". Other thread names are of the form "th%d:%s" + and include a unique number and the name of the thread-proc. + +`<event-name>`:: + is the event name. + +`<repo-id>`:: + when present, is a number indicating the repository + in use. A `def_repo` event is emitted when a repository is + opened. This defines the repo-id and associated worktree. + Subsequent repo-specific events will reference this repo-id. ++ +Currently, this is always "r1" for the main repository. +This field is in anticipation of in-proc submodules in the future. + +`<t_abs>`:: + when present, is the absolute time in seconds since the + program started. + +`<t_rel>`:: + when present, is time in seconds relative to the start of + the current region. For a thread-exit event, it is the elapsed + time of the thread. + +`<category>`:: + is present on region and data events and is used to + indicate a broad category, such as "index" or "status". + +`<perf-event-message>`:: + is a free-form `printf()` message intended for human consumption. + +------------ +15:33:33.532712 wt-status.c:2310 | d0 | main | region_enter | r1 | 0.126064 | | status | label:print +15:33:33.532712 wt-status.c:2331 | d0 | main | region_leave | r1 | 0.127568 | 0.001504 | status | label:print +------------ + +If `GIT_TRACE2_PERF_BRIEF` or `trace2.perfBrief` is true, the `time`, `file`, +and `line` fields are omitted. + +------------ +d0 | main | region_leave | r1 | 0.011717 | 0.009122 | index | label:preload +------------ + +The PERF target is intended for interactive performance analysis +during development and is quite noisy. + +=== EVENT Format + +Each event is a JSON-object containing multiple key/value pairs +written as a single line and followed by a LF. + +------------ +'{' <key> ':' <value> [',' <key> ':' <value>]* '}' LF +------------ + +Some key/value pairs are common to all events and some are +event-specific. + +==== Common Key/Value Pairs + +The following key/value pairs are common to all events: + +------------ +{ + "event":"version", + "sid":"20190408T191827.272759Z-H9b68c35f-P00003510", + "thread":"main", + "time":"2019-04-08T19:18:27.282761Z", + "file":"common-main.c", + "line":42, + ... +} +------------ + +`"event":<event>`:: + is the event name. + +`"sid":<sid>`:: + is the session-id. This is a unique string to identify the + process instance to allow all events emitted by a process to + be identified. A session-id is used instead of a PID because + PIDs are recycled by the OS. For child git processes, the + session-id is prepended with the session-id of the parent git + process to allow parent-child relationships to be identified + during post-processing. + +`"thread":<thread>`:: + is the thread name. + +`"time":<time>`:: + is the UTC time of the event. + +`"file":<filename>`:: + is source file generating the event. + +`"line":<line-number>`:: + is the integer source line number generating the event. + +`"repo":<repo-id>`:: + when present, is the integer repo-id as described previously. + +If `GIT_TRACE2_EVENT_BRIEF` or `trace2.eventBrief` is true, the `file` +and `line` fields are omitted from all events and the `time` field is +only present on the "start" and "atexit" events. + +==== Event-Specific Key/Value Pairs + +`"version"`:: + This event gives the version of the executable and the EVENT format. It + should always be the first event in a trace session. The EVENT format + version will be incremented if new event types are added, if existing + fields are removed, or if there are significant changes in + interpretation of existing events or fields. Smaller changes, such as + adding a new field to an existing event, will not require an increment + to the EVENT format version. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"version", + ... + "evt":"3", # EVENT format version + "exe":"2.20.1.155.g426c96fcdb" # git version +} +------------ + +`"too_many_files"`:: + This event is written to the git-trace2-discard sentinel file if there + are too many files in the target trace directory (see the + trace2.maxFiles config option). ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"too_many_files", + ... +} +------------ + +`"start"`:: + This event contains the complete argv received by main(). ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"start", + ... + "t_abs":0.001227, # elapsed time in seconds + "argv":["git","version"] +} +------------ + +`"exit"`:: + This event is emitted when git calls `exit()`. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"exit", + ... + "t_abs":0.001227, # elapsed time in seconds + "code":0 # exit code +} +------------ + +`"atexit"`:: + This event is emitted by the Trace2 `atexit` routine during + final shutdown. It should be the last event emitted by the + process. ++ +(The elapsed time reported here is greater than the time reported in +the "exit" event because it runs after all other atexit tasks have +completed.) ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"atexit", + ... + "t_abs":0.001227, # elapsed time in seconds + "code":0 # exit code +} +------------ + +`"signal"`:: + This event is emitted when the program is terminated by a user + signal. Depending on the platform, the signal event may + prevent the "atexit" event from being generated. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"signal", + ... + "t_abs":0.001227, # elapsed time in seconds + "signo":13 # SIGTERM, SIGINT, etc. +} +------------ + +`"error"`:: + This event is emitted when one of the `BUG()`, `bug()`, `error()`, + `die()`, `warning()`, or `usage()` functions are called. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"error", + ... + "msg":"invalid option: --cahced", # formatted error message + "fmt":"invalid option: %s" # error format string +} +------------ ++ +The error event may be emitted more than once. The format string +allows post-processors to group errors by type without worrying +about specific error arguments. + +`"cmd_path"`:: + This event contains the discovered full path of the git + executable (on platforms that are configured to resolve it). ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"cmd_path", + ... + "path":"C:/work/gfw/git.exe" +} +------------ + +`"cmd_ancestry"`:: + This event contains the text command name for the parent (and earlier + generations of parents) of the current process, in an array ordered from + nearest parent to furthest great-grandparent. It may not be implemented + on all platforms. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"cmd_ancestry", + ... + "ancestry":["bash","tmux: server","systemd"] +} +------------ + +`"cmd_name"`:: + This event contains the command name for this git process + and the hierarchy of commands from parent git processes. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"cmd_name", + ... + "name":"pack-objects", + "hierarchy":"push/pack-objects" +} +------------ ++ +Normally, the "name" field contains the canonical name of the +command. When a canonical name is not available, one of +these special values are used: ++ +------------ +"_query_" # "git --html-path" +"_run_dashed_" # when "git foo" tries to run "git-foo" +"_run_shell_alias_" # alias expansion to a shell command +"_run_git_alias_" # alias expansion to a git command +"_usage_" # usage error +------------ + +`"cmd_mode"`:: + This event, when present, describes the command variant. This + event may be emitted more than once. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"cmd_mode", + ... + "name":"branch" +} +------------ ++ +The "name" field is an arbitrary string to describe the command mode. +For example, checkout can checkout a branch or an individual file. +And these variations typically have different performance +characteristics that are not comparable. + +`"alias"`:: + This event is present when an alias is expanded. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"alias", + ... + "alias":"l", # registered alias + "argv":["log","--graph"] # alias expansion +} +------------ + +`"child_start"`:: + This event describes a child process that is about to be + spawned. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"child_start", + ... + "child_id":2, + "child_class":"?", + "use_shell":false, + "argv":["git","rev-list","--objects","--stdin","--not","--all","--quiet"] + + "hook_name":"<hook_name>" # present when child_class is "hook" + "cd":"<path>" # present when cd is required +} +------------ ++ +The "child_id" field can be used to match this child_start with the +corresponding child_exit event. ++ +The "child_class" field is a rough classification, such as "editor", +"pager", "transport/*", and "hook". Unclassified children are classified +with "?". + +`"child_exit"`:: + This event is generated after the current process has returned + from the `waitpid()` and collected the exit information from the + child. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"child_exit", + ... + "child_id":2, + "pid":14708, # child PID + "code":0, # child exit-code + "t_rel":0.110605 # observed run-time of child process +} +------------ ++ +Note that the session-id of the child process is not available to +the current/spawning process, so the child's PID is reported here as +a hint for post-processing. (But it is only a hint because the child +process may be a shell script which doesn't have a session-id.) ++ +Note that the `t_rel` field contains the observed run time in seconds +for the child process (starting before the fork/exec/spawn and +stopping after the `waitpid()` and includes OS process creation overhead). +So this time will be slightly larger than the atexit time reported by +the child process itself. + +`"child_ready"`:: + This event is generated after the current process has started + a background process and released all handles to it. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"child_ready", + ... + "child_id":2, + "pid":14708, # child PID + "ready":"ready", # child ready state + "t_rel":0.110605 # observed run-time of child process +} +------------ ++ +Note that the session-id of the child process is not available to +the current/spawning process, so the child's PID is reported here as +a hint for post-processing. (But it is only a hint because the child +process may be a shell script which doesn't have a session-id.) ++ +This event is generated after the child is started in the background +and given a little time to boot up and start working. If the child +starts up normally while the parent is still waiting, the "ready" +field will have the value "ready". +If the child is too slow to start and the parent times out, the field +will have the value "timeout". +If the child starts but the parent is unable to probe it, the field +will have the value "error". ++ +After the parent process emits this event, it will release all of its +handles to the child process and treat the child as a background +daemon. So even if the child does eventually finish booting up, +the parent will not emit an updated event. ++ +Note that the `t_rel` field contains the observed run time in seconds +when the parent released the child process into the background. +The child is assumed to be a long-running daemon process and may +outlive the parent process. So the parent's child event times should +not be compared to the child's atexit times. + +`"exec"`:: + This event is generated before git attempts to `exec()` + another command rather than starting a child process. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"exec", + ... + "exec_id":0, + "exe":"git", + "argv":["foo", "bar"] +} +------------ ++ +The "exec_id" field is a command-unique id and is only useful if the +`exec()` fails and a corresponding exec_result event is generated. + +`"exec_result"`:: + This event is generated if the `exec()` fails and control + returns to the current git command. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"exec_result", + ... + "exec_id":0, + "code":1 # error code (errno) from exec() +} +------------ + +`"thread_start"`:: + This event is generated when a thread is started. It is + generated from *within* the new thread's thread-proc (because + it needs to access data in the thread's thread-local storage). ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"thread_start", + ... + "thread":"th02:preload_thread" # thread name +} +------------ + +`"thread_exit"`:: + This event is generated when a thread exits. It is generated + from *within* the thread's thread-proc. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"thread_exit", + ... + "thread":"th02:preload_thread", # thread name + "t_rel":0.007328 # thread elapsed time +} +------------ + +`"def_param"`:: + This event is generated to log a global parameter, such as a config + setting, command-line flag, or environment variable. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"def_param", + ... + "scope":"global", + "param":"core.abbrev", + "value":"7" +} +------------ + +`"def_repo"`:: + This event defines a repo-id and associates it with the root + of the worktree. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"def_repo", + ... + "repo":1, + "worktree":"/Users/jeffhost/work/gfw" +} +------------ ++ +As stated earlier, the repo-id is currently always 1, so there will +only be one def_repo event. Later, if in-proc submodules are +supported, a def_repo event should be emitted for each submodule +visited. + +`"region_enter"`:: + This event is generated when entering a region. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"region_enter", + ... + "repo":1, # optional + "nesting":1, # current region stack depth + "category":"index", # optional + "label":"do_read_index", # optional + "msg":".git/index" # optional +} +------------ ++ +The `category` field may be used in a future enhancement to +do category-based filtering. ++ +`GIT_TRACE2_EVENT_NESTING` or `trace2.eventNesting` can be used to +filter deeply nested regions and data events. It defaults to "2". + +`"region_leave"`:: + This event is generated when leaving a region. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"region_leave", + ... + "repo":1, # optional + "t_rel":0.002876, # time spent in region in seconds + "nesting":1, # region stack depth + "category":"index", # optional + "label":"do_read_index", # optional + "msg":".git/index" # optional +} +------------ + +`"data"`:: + This event is generated to log a thread- and region-local + key/value pair. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"data", + ... + "repo":1, # optional + "t_abs":0.024107, # absolute elapsed time + "t_rel":0.001031, # elapsed time in region/thread + "nesting":2, # region stack depth + "category":"index", + "key":"read/cache_nr", + "value":"3552" +} +------------ ++ +The "value" field may be an integer or a string. + +`"data-json"`:: + This event is generated to log a pre-formatted JSON string + containing structured data. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"data_json", + ... + "repo":1, # optional + "t_abs":0.015905, + "t_rel":0.015905, + "nesting":1, + "category":"process", + "key":"windows/ancestry", + "value":["bash.exe","bash.exe"] +} +------------ + +`"th_timer"`:: + This event logs the amount of time that a stopwatch timer was + running in the thread. This event is generated when a thread + exits for timers that requested per-thread events. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"th_timer", + ... + "category":"my_category", + "name":"my_timer", + "intervals":5, # number of time it was started/stopped + "t_total":0.052741, # total time in seconds it was running + "t_min":0.010061, # shortest interval + "t_max":0.011648 # longest interval +} +------------ + +`"timer"`:: + This event logs the amount of time that a stopwatch timer was + running aggregated across all threads. This event is generated + when the process exits. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"timer", + ... + "category":"my_category", + "name":"my_timer", + "intervals":5, # number of time it was started/stopped + "t_total":0.052741, # total time in seconds it was running + "t_min":0.010061, # shortest interval + "t_max":0.011648 # longest interval +} +------------ + +`"th_counter"`:: + This event logs the value of a counter variable in a thread. + This event is generated when a thread exits for counters that + requested per-thread events. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"th_counter", + ... + "category":"my_category", + "name":"my_counter", + "count":23 +} +------------ + +`"counter"`:: + This event logs the value of a counter variable across all threads. + This event is generated when the process exits. The total value + reported here is the sum across all threads. ++ +------------ +{ + "event":"counter", + ... + "category":"my_category", + "name":"my_counter", + "count":23 +} +------------ + + +== Example Trace2 API Usage + +Here is a hypothetical usage of the Trace2 API showing the intended +usage (without worrying about the actual Git details). + +Initialization:: + + Initialization happens in `main()`. Behind the scenes, an + `atexit` and `signal` handler are registered. ++ +---------------- +int main(int argc, const char **argv) +{ + int exit_code; + + trace2_initialize(); + trace2_cmd_start(argv); + + exit_code = cmd_main(argc, argv); + + trace2_cmd_exit(exit_code); + + return exit_code; +} +---------------- + +Command Details:: + + After the basics are established, additional command + information can be sent to Trace2 as it is discovered. ++ +---------------- +int cmd_checkout(int argc, const char **argv) +{ + trace2_cmd_name("checkout"); + trace2_cmd_mode("branch"); + trace2_def_repo(the_repository); + + // emit "def_param" messages for "interesting" config settings. + trace2_cmd_list_config(); + + if (do_something()) + trace2_cmd_error("Path '%s': cannot do something", path); + + return 0; +} +---------------- + +Child Processes:: + + Wrap code spawning child processes. ++ +---------------- +void run_child(...) +{ + int child_exit_code; + struct child_process cmd = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT; + ... + cmd.trace2_child_class = "editor"; + + trace2_child_start(&cmd); + child_exit_code = spawn_child_and_wait_for_it(); + trace2_child_exit(&cmd, child_exit_code); +} +---------------- ++ +For example, the following fetch command spawned ssh, index-pack, +rev-list, and gc. This example also shows that fetch took +5.199 seconds and of that 4.932 was in ssh. ++ +---------------- +$ export GIT_TRACE2_BRIEF=1 +$ export GIT_TRACE2=~/log.normal +$ git fetch origin +... +---------------- ++ +---------------- +$ cat ~/log.normal +version 2.20.1.vfs.1.1.47.g534dbe1ad1 +start git fetch origin +worktree /Users/jeffhost/work/gfw +cmd_name fetch (fetch) +child_start[0] ssh git@github.com ... +child_start[1] git index-pack ... +... (Trace2 events from child processes omitted) +child_exit[1] pid:14707 code:0 elapsed:0.076353 +child_exit[0] pid:14706 code:0 elapsed:4.931869 +child_start[2] git rev-list ... +... (Trace2 events from child process omitted) +child_exit[2] pid:14708 code:0 elapsed:0.110605 +child_start[3] git gc --auto +... (Trace2 events from child process omitted) +child_exit[3] pid:14709 code:0 elapsed:0.006240 +exit elapsed:5.198503 code:0 +atexit elapsed:5.198541 code:0 +---------------- ++ +When a git process is a (direct or indirect) child of another +git process, it inherits Trace2 context information. This +allows the child to print the command hierarchy. This example +shows gc as child[3] of fetch. When the gc process reports +its name as "gc", it also reports the hierarchy as "fetch/gc". +(In this example, trace2 messages from the child process is +indented for clarity.) ++ +---------------- +$ export GIT_TRACE2_BRIEF=1 +$ export GIT_TRACE2=~/log.normal +$ git fetch origin +... +---------------- ++ +---------------- +$ cat ~/log.normal +version 2.20.1.160.g5676107ecd.dirty +start git fetch official +worktree /Users/jeffhost/work/gfw +cmd_name fetch (fetch) +... +child_start[3] git gc --auto + version 2.20.1.160.g5676107ecd.dirty + start /Users/jeffhost/work/gfw/git gc --auto + worktree /Users/jeffhost/work/gfw + cmd_name gc (fetch/gc) + exit elapsed:0.001959 code:0 + atexit elapsed:0.001997 code:0 +child_exit[3] pid:20303 code:0 elapsed:0.007564 +exit elapsed:3.868938 code:0 +atexit elapsed:3.868970 code:0 +---------------- + +Regions:: + + Regions can be used to time an interesting section of code. ++ +---------------- +void wt_status_collect(struct wt_status *s) +{ + trace2_region_enter("status", "worktrees", s->repo); + wt_status_collect_changes_worktree(s); + trace2_region_leave("status", "worktrees", s->repo); + + trace2_region_enter("status", "index", s->repo); + wt_status_collect_changes_index(s); + trace2_region_leave("status", "index", s->repo); + + trace2_region_enter("status", "untracked", s->repo); + wt_status_collect_untracked(s); + trace2_region_leave("status", "untracked", s->repo); +} + +void wt_status_print(struct wt_status *s) +{ + trace2_region_enter("status", "print", s->repo); + switch (s->status_format) { + ... + } + trace2_region_leave("status", "print", s->repo); +} +---------------- ++ +In this example, scanning for untracked files ran from +0.012568 to ++0.027149 (since the process started) and took 0.014581 seconds. ++ +---------------- +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF_BRIEF=1 +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF=~/log.perf +$ git status +... + +$ cat ~/log.perf +d0 | main | version | | | | | 2.20.1.160.g5676107ecd.dirty +d0 | main | start | | 0.001173 | | | git status +d0 | main | def_repo | r1 | | | | worktree:/Users/jeffhost/work/gfw +d0 | main | cmd_name | | | | | status (status) +... +d0 | main | region_enter | r1 | 0.010988 | | status | label:worktrees +d0 | main | region_leave | r1 | 0.011236 | 0.000248 | status | label:worktrees +d0 | main | region_enter | r1 | 0.011260 | | status | label:index +d0 | main | region_leave | r1 | 0.012542 | 0.001282 | status | label:index +d0 | main | region_enter | r1 | 0.012568 | | status | label:untracked +d0 | main | region_leave | r1 | 0.027149 | 0.014581 | status | label:untracked +d0 | main | region_enter | r1 | 0.027411 | | status | label:print +d0 | main | region_leave | r1 | 0.028741 | 0.001330 | status | label:print +d0 | main | exit | | 0.028778 | | | code:0 +d0 | main | atexit | | 0.028809 | | | code:0 +---------------- ++ +Regions may be nested. This causes messages to be indented in the +PERF target, for example. +Elapsed times are relative to the start of the corresponding nesting +level as expected. For example, if we add region message to: ++ +---------------- +static enum path_treatment read_directory_recursive(struct dir_struct *dir, + struct index_state *istate, const char *base, int baselen, + struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked, int check_only, + int stop_at_first_file, const struct pathspec *pathspec) +{ + enum path_treatment state, subdir_state, dir_state = path_none; + + trace2_region_enter_printf("dir", "read_recursive", NULL, "%.*s", baselen, base); + ... + trace2_region_leave_printf("dir", "read_recursive", NULL, "%.*s", baselen, base); + return dir_state; +} +---------------- ++ +We can further investigate the time spent scanning for untracked files. ++ +---------------- +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF_BRIEF=1 +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF=~/log.perf +$ git status +... +$ cat ~/log.perf +d0 | main | version | | | | | 2.20.1.162.gb4ccea44db.dirty +d0 | main | start | | 0.001173 | | | git status +d0 | main | def_repo | r1 | | | | worktree:/Users/jeffhost/work/gfw +d0 | main | cmd_name | | | | | status (status) +... +d0 | main | region_enter | r1 | 0.015047 | | status | label:untracked +d0 | main | region_enter | | 0.015132 | | dir | ..label:read_recursive +d0 | main | region_enter | | 0.016341 | | dir | ....label:read_recursive vcs-svn/ +d0 | main | region_leave | | 0.016422 | 0.000081 | dir | ....label:read_recursive vcs-svn/ +d0 | main | region_enter | | 0.016446 | | dir | ....label:read_recursive xdiff/ +d0 | main | region_leave | | 0.016522 | 0.000076 | dir | ....label:read_recursive xdiff/ +d0 | main | region_enter | | 0.016612 | | dir | ....label:read_recursive git-gui/ +d0 | main | region_enter | | 0.016698 | | dir | ......label:read_recursive git-gui/po/ +d0 | main | region_enter | | 0.016810 | | dir | ........label:read_recursive git-gui/po/glossary/ +d0 | main | region_leave | | 0.016863 | 0.000053 | dir | ........label:read_recursive git-gui/po/glossary/ +... +d0 | main | region_enter | | 0.031876 | | dir | ....label:read_recursive builtin/ +d0 | main | region_leave | | 0.032270 | 0.000394 | dir | ....label:read_recursive builtin/ +d0 | main | region_leave | | 0.032414 | 0.017282 | dir | ..label:read_recursive +d0 | main | region_leave | r1 | 0.032454 | 0.017407 | status | label:untracked +... +d0 | main | exit | | 0.034279 | | | code:0 +d0 | main | atexit | | 0.034322 | | | code:0 +---------------- ++ +Trace2 regions are similar to the existing trace_performance_enter() +and trace_performance_leave() routines, but are thread safe and +maintain per-thread stacks of timers. + +Data Messages:: + + Data messages added to a region. ++ +---------------- +int read_index_from(struct index_state *istate, const char *path, + const char *gitdir) +{ + trace2_region_enter_printf("index", "do_read_index", the_repository, "%s", path); + + ... + + trace2_data_intmax("index", the_repository, "read/version", istate->version); + trace2_data_intmax("index", the_repository, "read/cache_nr", istate->cache_nr); + + trace2_region_leave_printf("index", "do_read_index", the_repository, "%s", path); +} +---------------- ++ +This example shows that the index contained 3552 entries. ++ +---------------- +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF_BRIEF=1 +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF=~/log.perf +$ git status +... +$ cat ~/log.perf +d0 | main | version | | | | | 2.20.1.156.gf9916ae094.dirty +d0 | main | start | | 0.001173 | | | git status +d0 | main | def_repo | r1 | | | | worktree:/Users/jeffhost/work/gfw +d0 | main | cmd_name | | | | | status (status) +d0 | main | region_enter | r1 | 0.001791 | | index | label:do_read_index .git/index +d0 | main | data | r1 | 0.002494 | 0.000703 | index | ..read/version:2 +d0 | main | data | r1 | 0.002520 | 0.000729 | index | ..read/cache_nr:3552 +d0 | main | region_leave | r1 | 0.002539 | 0.000748 | index | label:do_read_index .git/index +... +---------------- + +Thread Events:: + + Thread messages added to a thread-proc. ++ +For example, the multi-threaded preload-index code can be +instrumented with a region around the thread pool and then +per-thread start and exit events within the thread-proc. ++ +---------------- +static void *preload_thread(void *_data) +{ + // start the per-thread clock and emit a message. + trace2_thread_start("preload_thread"); + + // report which chunk of the array this thread was assigned. + trace2_data_intmax("index", the_repository, "offset", p->offset); + trace2_data_intmax("index", the_repository, "count", nr); + + do { + ... + } while (--nr > 0); + ... + + // report elapsed time taken by this thread. + trace2_thread_exit(); + return NULL; +} + +void preload_index(struct index_state *index, + const struct pathspec *pathspec, + unsigned int refresh_flags) +{ + trace2_region_enter("index", "preload", the_repository); + + for (i = 0; i < threads; i++) { + ... /* create thread */ + } + + for (i = 0; i < threads; i++) { + ... /* join thread */ + } + + trace2_region_leave("index", "preload", the_repository); +} +---------------- ++ +In this example preload_index() was executed by the `main` thread +and started the `preload` region. Seven threads, named +`th01:preload_thread` through `th07:preload_thread`, were started. +Events from each thread are atomically appended to the shared target +stream as they occur so they may appear in random order with respect +other threads. Finally, the main thread waits for the threads to +finish and leaves the region. ++ +Data events are tagged with the active thread name. They are used +to report the per-thread parameters. ++ +---------------- +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF_BRIEF=1 +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF=~/log.perf +$ git status +... +$ cat ~/log.perf +... +d0 | main | region_enter | r1 | 0.002595 | | index | label:preload +d0 | th01:preload_thread | thread_start | | 0.002699 | | | +d0 | th02:preload_thread | thread_start | | 0.002721 | | | +d0 | th01:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.002736 | 0.000037 | index | offset:0 +d0 | th02:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.002751 | 0.000030 | index | offset:2032 +d0 | th03:preload_thread | thread_start | | 0.002711 | | | +d0 | th06:preload_thread | thread_start | | 0.002739 | | | +d0 | th01:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.002766 | 0.000067 | index | count:508 +d0 | th06:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.002856 | 0.000117 | index | offset:2540 +d0 | th03:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.002824 | 0.000113 | index | offset:1016 +d0 | th04:preload_thread | thread_start | | 0.002710 | | | +d0 | th02:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.002779 | 0.000058 | index | count:508 +d0 | th06:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.002966 | 0.000227 | index | count:508 +d0 | th07:preload_thread | thread_start | | 0.002741 | | | +d0 | th07:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.003017 | 0.000276 | index | offset:3048 +d0 | th05:preload_thread | thread_start | | 0.002712 | | | +d0 | th05:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.003067 | 0.000355 | index | offset:1524 +d0 | th05:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.003090 | 0.000378 | index | count:508 +d0 | th07:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.003037 | 0.000296 | index | count:504 +d0 | th03:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.002971 | 0.000260 | index | count:508 +d0 | th04:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.002983 | 0.000273 | index | offset:508 +d0 | th04:preload_thread | data | r1 | 0.007311 | 0.004601 | index | count:508 +d0 | th05:preload_thread | thread_exit | | 0.008781 | 0.006069 | | +d0 | th01:preload_thread | thread_exit | | 0.009561 | 0.006862 | | +d0 | th03:preload_thread | thread_exit | | 0.009742 | 0.007031 | | +d0 | th06:preload_thread | thread_exit | | 0.009820 | 0.007081 | | +d0 | th02:preload_thread | thread_exit | | 0.010274 | 0.007553 | | +d0 | th07:preload_thread | thread_exit | | 0.010477 | 0.007736 | | +d0 | th04:preload_thread | thread_exit | | 0.011657 | 0.008947 | | +d0 | main | region_leave | r1 | 0.011717 | 0.009122 | index | label:preload +... +d0 | main | exit | | 0.029996 | | | code:0 +d0 | main | atexit | | 0.030027 | | | code:0 +---------------- ++ +In this example, the preload region took 0.009122 seconds. The 7 threads +took between 0.006069 and 0.008947 seconds to work on their portion of +the index. Thread "th01" worked on 508 items at offset 0. Thread "th02" +worked on 508 items at offset 2032. Thread "th04" worked on 508 items +at offset 508. ++ +This example also shows that thread names are assigned in a racy manner +as each thread starts. + +Config (def param) Events:: + + Dump "interesting" config values to trace2 log. ++ +We can optionally emit configuration events, see +`trace2.configparams` in linkgit:git-config[1] for how to enable +it. ++ +---------------- +$ git config --system color.ui never +$ git config --global color.ui always +$ git config --local color.ui auto +$ git config --list --show-scope | grep 'color.ui' +system color.ui=never +global color.ui=always +local color.ui=auto +---------------- ++ +Then, mark the config `color.ui` as "interesting" config with +`GIT_TRACE2_CONFIG_PARAMS`: ++ +---------------- +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF_BRIEF=1 +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF=~/log.perf +$ export GIT_TRACE2_CONFIG_PARAMS=color.ui +$ git version +... +$ cat ~/log.perf +d0 | main | version | | | | | ... +d0 | main | start | | 0.001642 | | | /usr/local/bin/git version +d0 | main | cmd_name | | | | | version (version) +d0 | main | def_param | | | | scope:system | color.ui:never +d0 | main | def_param | | | | scope:global | color.ui:always +d0 | main | def_param | | | | scope:local | color.ui:auto +d0 | main | data | r0 | 0.002100 | 0.002100 | fsync | fsync/writeout-only:0 +d0 | main | data | r0 | 0.002126 | 0.002126 | fsync | fsync/hardware-flush:0 +d0 | main | exit | | 0.000470 | | | code:0 +d0 | main | atexit | | 0.000477 | | | code:0 +---------------- + +Stopwatch Timer Events:: + + Measure the time spent in a function call or span of code + that might be called from many places within the code + throughout the life of the process. ++ +---------------- +static void expensive_function(void) +{ + trace2_timer_start(TRACE2_TIMER_ID_TEST1); + ... + sleep_millisec(1000); // Do something expensive + ... + trace2_timer_stop(TRACE2_TIMER_ID_TEST1); +} + +static int ut_100timer(int argc, const char **argv) +{ + ... + + expensive_function(); + + // Do something else 1... + + expensive_function(); + + // Do something else 2... + + expensive_function(); + + return 0; +} +---------------- ++ +In this example, we measure the total time spent in +`expensive_function()` regardless of when it is called +in the overall flow of the program. ++ +---------------- +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF_BRIEF=1 +$ export GIT_TRACE2_PERF=~/log.perf +$ t/helper/test-tool trace2 100timer 3 1000 +... +$ cat ~/log.perf +d0 | main | version | | | | | ... +d0 | main | start | | 0.001453 | | | t/helper/test-tool trace2 100timer 3 1000 +d0 | main | cmd_name | | | | | trace2 (trace2) +d0 | main | exit | | 3.003667 | | | code:0 +d0 | main | timer | | | | test | name:test1 intervals:3 total:3.001686 min:1.000254 max:1.000929 +d0 | main | atexit | | 3.003796 | | | code:0 +---------------- + + +== Future Work + +=== Relationship to the Existing Trace Api (api-trace.txt) + +There are a few issues to resolve before we can completely +switch to Trace2. + +* Updating existing tests that assume `GIT_TRACE` format messages. + +* How to best handle custom `GIT_TRACE_<key>` messages? + +** The `GIT_TRACE_<key>` mechanism allows each <key> to write to a +different file (in addition to just stderr). + +** Do we want to maintain that ability or simply write to the existing +Trace2 targets (and convert <key> to a "category"). diff --git a/Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt b/Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c2e652b --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@ +GIT bitmap v1 format +==================== + +== Pack and multi-pack bitmaps + +Bitmaps store reachability information about the set of objects in a packfile, +or a multi-pack index (MIDX). The former is defined obviously, and the latter is +defined as the union of objects in packs contained in the MIDX. + +A bitmap may belong to either one pack, or the repository's multi-pack index (if +it exists). A repository may have at most one bitmap. + +An object is uniquely described by its bit position within a bitmap: + + - If the bitmap belongs to a packfile, the __n__th bit corresponds to + the __n__th object in pack order. For a function `offset` which maps + objects to their byte offset within a pack, pack order is defined as + follows: + + o1 <= o2 <==> offset(o1) <= offset(o2) + + - If the bitmap belongs to a MIDX, the __n__th bit corresponds to the + __n__th object in MIDX order. With an additional function `pack` which + maps objects to the pack they were selected from by the MIDX, MIDX order + is defined as follows: + + o1 <= o2 <==> pack(o1) <= pack(o2) /\ offset(o1) <= offset(o2) ++ +The ordering between packs is done according to the MIDX's .rev file. +Notably, the preferred pack sorts ahead of all other packs. + +The on-disk representation (described below) of a bitmap is the same regardless +of whether or not that bitmap belongs to a packfile or a MIDX. The only +difference is the interpretation of the bits, which is described above. + +Certain bitmap extensions are supported (see: Appendix B). No extensions are +required for bitmaps corresponding to packfiles. For bitmaps that correspond to +MIDXs, both the bit-cache and rev-cache extensions are required. + +== On-disk format + + * A header appears at the beginning: + + 4-byte signature: :: {'B', 'I', 'T', 'M'} + + 2-byte version number (network byte order): :: + + The current implementation only supports version 1 + of the bitmap index (the same one as JGit). + + 2-byte flags (network byte order): :: + + The following flags are supported: + + ** {empty} + BITMAP_OPT_FULL_DAG (0x1) REQUIRED: ::: + + This flag must always be present. It implies that the + bitmap index has been generated for a packfile or + multi-pack index (MIDX) with full closure (i.e. where + every single object in the packfile/MIDX can find its + parent links inside the same packfile/MIDX). This is a + requirement for the bitmap index format, also present in + JGit, that greatly reduces the complexity of the + implementation. + + ** {empty} + BITMAP_OPT_HASH_CACHE (0x4): ::: + + If present, the end of the bitmap file contains + `N` 32-bit name-hash values, one per object in the + pack/MIDX. The format and meaning of the name-hash is + described below. + + ** {empty} + BITMAP_OPT_LOOKUP_TABLE (0x10): ::: + If present, the end of the bitmap file contains a table + containing a list of `N` <commit_pos, offset, xor_row> + triplets. The format and meaning of the table is described + below. ++ +NOTE: Unlike the xor_offset used to compress an individual bitmap, +`xor_row` stores an *absolute* index into the lookup table, not a location +relative to the current entry. + + 4-byte entry count (network byte order): :: + The total count of entries (bitmapped commits) in this bitmap index. + + 20-byte checksum: :: + The SHA1 checksum of the pack/MIDX this bitmap index + belongs to. + + * 4 EWAH bitmaps that act as type indexes ++ +Type indexes are serialized after the hash cache in the shape +of four EWAH bitmaps stored consecutively (see Appendix A for +the serialization format of an EWAH bitmap). ++ +There is a bitmap for each Git object type, stored in the following +order: ++ + - Commits + - Trees + - Blobs + - Tags + ++ +In each bitmap, the `n`th bit is set to true if the `n`th object +in the packfile or multi-pack index is of that type. ++ +The obvious consequence is that the OR of all 4 bitmaps will result +in a full set (all bits set), and the AND of all 4 bitmaps will +result in an empty bitmap (no bits set). + + * N entries with compressed bitmaps, one for each indexed commit ++ +Where `N` is the total amount of entries in this bitmap index. +Each entry contains the following: + + ** {empty} + 4-byte object position (network byte order): :: + The position **in the index for the packfile or + multi-pack index** where the bitmap for this commit is + found. + + ** {empty} + 1-byte XOR-offset: :: + The xor offset used to compress this bitmap. For an entry + in position `x`, a XOR offset of `y` means that the actual + bitmap representing this commit is composed by XORing the + bitmap for this entry with the bitmap in entry `x-y` (i.e. + the bitmap `y` entries before this one). ++ +NOTE: This compression can be recursive. In order to +XOR this entry with a previous one, the previous entry needs +to be decompressed first, and so on. ++ +The hard-limit for this offset is 160 (an entry can only be +xor'ed against one of the 160 entries preceding it). This +number is always positive, and hence entries are always xor'ed +with **previous** bitmaps, not bitmaps that will come afterwards +in the index. + + ** {empty} + 1-byte flags for this bitmap: :: + At the moment the only available flag is `0x1`, which hints + that this bitmap can be re-used when rebuilding bitmap indexes + for the repository. + + ** The compressed bitmap itself, see Appendix A. + + * {empty} + TRAILER: :: + Trailing checksum of the preceding contents. + +== Appendix A: Serialization format for an EWAH bitmap + +Ewah bitmaps are serialized in the same protocol as the JAVAEWAH +library, making them backwards compatible with the JGit +implementation: + + - 4-byte number of bits of the resulting UNCOMPRESSED bitmap + + - 4-byte number of words of the COMPRESSED bitmap, when stored + + - N x 8-byte words, as specified by the previous field ++ +This is the actual content of the compressed bitmap. + + - 4-byte position of the current RLW for the compressed + bitmap + +All words are stored in network byte order for their corresponding +sizes. + +The compressed bitmap is stored in a form of run-length encoding, as +follows. It consists of a concatenation of an arbitrary number of +chunks. Each chunk consists of one or more 64-bit words + + H L_1 L_2 L_3 .... L_M + +H is called RLW (run length word). It consists of (from lower to higher +order bits): + + - 1 bit: the repeated bit B + + - 32 bits: repetition count K (unsigned) + + - 31 bits: literal word count M (unsigned) + +The bitstream represented by the above chunk is then: + + - K repetitions of B + + - The bits stored in `L_1` through `L_M`. Within a word, bits at + lower order come earlier in the stream than those at higher + order. + +The next word after `L_M` (if any) must again be a RLW, for the next +chunk. For efficient appending to the bitstream, the EWAH stores a +pointer to the last RLW in the stream. + + +== Appendix B: Optional Bitmap Sections + +These sections may or may not be present in the `.bitmap` file; their +presence is indicated by the header flags section described above. + +Name-hash cache +--------------- + +If the BITMAP_OPT_HASH_CACHE flag is set, the end of the bitmap contains +a cache of 32-bit values, one per object in the pack/MIDX. The value at +position `i` is the hash of the pathname at which the `i`th object +(counting in index or multi-pack index order) in the pack/MIDX can be found. +This can be fed into the delta heuristics to compare objects with similar +pathnames. + +The hash algorithm used is: + + hash = 0; + while ((c = *name++)) + if (!isspace(c)) + hash = (hash >> 2) + (c << 24); + +Note that this hashing scheme is tied to the BITMAP_OPT_HASH_CACHE flag. +If implementations want to choose a different hashing scheme, they are +free to do so, but MUST allocate a new header flag (because comparing +hashes made under two different schemes would be pointless). + +Commit lookup table +------------------- + +If the BITMAP_OPT_LOOKUP_TABLE flag is set, the last `N * (4 + 8 + 4)` +bytes (preceding the name-hash cache and trailing hash) of the `.bitmap` +file contains a lookup table specifying the information needed to get +the desired bitmap from the entries without parsing previous unnecessary +bitmaps. + +For a `.bitmap` containing `nr_entries` reachability bitmaps, the table +contains a list of `nr_entries` <commit_pos, offset, xor_row> triplets +(sorted in the ascending order of `commit_pos`). The content of i'th +triplet is - + + * {empty} + commit_pos (4 byte integer, network byte order): :: + It stores the object position of a commit (in the midx or pack + index). + + * {empty} + offset (8 byte integer, network byte order): :: + The offset from which that commit's bitmap can be read. + + * {empty} + xor_row (4 byte integer, network byte order): :: + The position of the triplet whose bitmap is used to compress + this one, or `0xffffffff` if no such bitmap exists. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/bundle-uri.txt b/Documentation/technical/bundle-uri.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b78d01d --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/bundle-uri.txt @@ -0,0 +1,572 @@ +Bundle URIs +=========== + +Git bundles are files that store a pack-file along with some extra metadata, +including a set of refs and a (possibly empty) set of necessary commits. See +linkgit:git-bundle[1] and linkgit:gitformat-bundle[5] for more information. + +Bundle URIs are locations where Git can download one or more bundles in +order to bootstrap the object database in advance of fetching the remaining +objects from a remote. + +One goal is to speed up clones and fetches for users with poor network +connectivity to the origin server. Another benefit is to allow heavy users, +such as CI build farms, to use local resources for the majority of Git data +and thereby reducing the load on the origin server. + +To enable the bundle URI feature, users can specify a bundle URI using +command-line options or the origin server can advertise one or more URIs +via a protocol v2 capability. + +Design Goals +------------ + +The bundle URI standard aims to be flexible enough to satisfy multiple +workloads. The bundle provider and the Git client have several choices in +how they create and consume bundle URIs. + +* Bundles can have whatever name the server desires. This name could refer + to immutable data by using a hash of the bundle contents. However, this + means that a new URI will be needed after every update of the content. + This might be acceptable if the server is advertising the URI (and the + server is aware of new bundles being generated) but would not be + ergonomic for users using the command line option. + +* The bundles could be organized specifically for bootstrapping full + clones, but could also be organized with the intention of bootstrapping + incremental fetches. The bundle provider must decide on one of several + organization schemes to minimize client downloads during incremental + fetches, but the Git client can also choose whether to use bundles for + either of these operations. + +* The bundle provider can choose to support full clones, partial clones, + or both. The client can detect which bundles are appropriate for the + repository's partial clone filter, if any. + +* The bundle provider can use a single bundle (for clones only), or a + list of bundles. When using a list of bundles, the provider can specify + whether or not the client needs _all_ of the bundle URIs for a full + clone, or if _any_ one of the bundle URIs is sufficient. This allows the + bundle provider to use different URIs for different geographies. + +* The bundle provider can organize the bundles using heuristics, such as + creation tokens, to help the client prevent downloading bundles it does + not need. When the bundle provider does not provide these heuristics, + the client can use optimizations to minimize how much of the data is + downloaded. + +* The bundle provider does not need to be associated with the Git server. + The client can choose to use the bundle provider without it being + advertised by the Git server. + +* The client can choose to discover bundle providers that are advertised + by the Git server. This could happen during `git clone`, during + `git fetch`, both, or neither. The user can choose which combination + works best for them. + +* The client can choose to configure a bundle provider manually at any + time. The client can also choose to specify a bundle provider manually + as a command-line option to `git clone`. + +Each repository is different and every Git server has different needs. +Hopefully the bundle URI feature is flexible enough to satisfy all needs. +If not, then the feature can be extended through its versioning mechanism. + +Server requirements +------------------- + +To provide a server-side implementation of bundle servers, no other parts +of the Git protocol are required. This allows server maintainers to use +static content solutions such as CDNs in order to serve the bundle files. + +At the current scope of the bundle URI feature, all URIs are expected to +be HTTP(S) URLs where content is downloaded to a local file using a `GET` +request to that URL. The server could include authentication requirements +to those requests with the aim of triggering the configured credential +helper for secure access. (Future extensions could use "file://" URIs or +SSH URIs.) + +Assuming a `200 OK` response from the server, the content at the URL is +inspected. First, Git attempts to parse the file as a bundle file of +version 2 or higher. If the file is not a bundle, then the file is parsed +as a plain-text file using Git's config parser. The key-value pairs in +that config file are expected to describe a list of bundle URIs. If +neither of these parse attempts succeed, then Git will report an error to +the user that the bundle URI provided erroneous data. + +Any other data provided by the server is considered erroneous. + +Bundle Lists +------------ + +The Git server can advertise bundle URIs using a set of `key=value` pairs. +A bundle URI can also serve a plain-text file in the Git config format +containing these same `key=value` pairs. In both cases, we consider this +to be a _bundle list_. The pairs specify information about the bundles +that the client can use to make decisions for which bundles to download +and which to ignore. + +A few keys focus on properties of the list itself. + +bundle.version:: + (Required) This value provides a version number for the bundle + list. If a future Git change enables a feature that needs the Git + client to react to a new key in the bundle list file, then this version + will increment. The only current version number is 1, and if any other + value is specified then Git will fail to use this file. + +bundle.mode:: + (Required) This value has one of two values: `all` and `any`. When `all` + is specified, then the client should expect to need all of the listed + bundle URIs that match their repository's requirements. When `any` is + specified, then the client should expect that any one of the bundle URIs + that match their repository's requirements will suffice. Typically, the + `any` option is used to list a number of different bundle servers + located in different geographies. + +bundle.heuristic:: + If this string-valued key exists, then the bundle list is designed to + work well with incremental `git fetch` commands. The heuristic signals + that there are additional keys available for each bundle that help + determine which subset of bundles the client should download. The only + heuristic currently planned is `creationToken`. + +The remaining keys include an `<id>` segment which is a server-designated +name for each available bundle. The `<id>` must contain only alphanumeric +and `-` characters. + +bundle.<id>.uri:: + (Required) This string value is the URI for downloading bundle `<id>`. + If the URI begins with a protocol (`http://` or `https://`) then the URI + is absolute. Otherwise, the URI is interpreted as relative to the URI + used for the bundle list. If the URI begins with `/`, then that relative + path is relative to the domain name used for the bundle list. (This use + of relative paths is intended to make it easier to distribute a set of + bundles across a large number of servers or CDNs with different domain + names.) + +bundle.<id>.filter:: + This string value represents an object filter that should also appear in + the header of this bundle. The server uses this value to differentiate + different kinds of bundles from which the client can choose those that + match their object filters. + +bundle.<id>.creationToken:: + This value is a nonnegative 64-bit integer used for sorting the bundles + list. This is used to download a subset of bundles during a fetch when + `bundle.heuristic=creationToken`. + +bundle.<id>.location:: + This string value advertises a real-world location from where the bundle + URI is served. This can be used to present the user with an option for + which bundle URI to use or simply as an informative indicator of which + bundle URI was selected by Git. This is only valuable when + `bundle.mode` is `any`. + +Here is an example bundle list using the Git config format: + + [bundle] + version = 1 + mode = all + heuristic = creationToken + + [bundle "2022-02-09-1644442601-daily"] + uri = https://bundles.example.com/git/git/2022-02-09-1644442601-daily.bundle + creationToken = 1644442601 + + [bundle "2022-02-02-1643842562"] + uri = https://bundles.example.com/git/git/2022-02-02-1643842562.bundle + creationToken = 1643842562 + + [bundle "2022-02-09-1644442631-daily-blobless"] + uri = 2022-02-09-1644442631-daily-blobless.bundle + creationToken = 1644442631 + filter = blob:none + + [bundle "2022-02-02-1643842568-blobless"] + uri = /git/git/2022-02-02-1643842568-blobless.bundle + creationToken = 1643842568 + filter = blob:none + +This example uses `bundle.mode=all` as well as the +`bundle.<id>.creationToken` heuristic. It also uses the `bundle.<id>.filter` +options to present two parallel sets of bundles: one for full clones and +another for blobless partial clones. + +Suppose that this bundle list was found at the URI +`https://bundles.example.com/git/git/` and so the two blobless bundles have +the following fully-expanded URIs: + +* `https://bundles.example.com/git/git/2022-02-09-1644442631-daily-blobless.bundle` +* `https://bundles.example.com/git/git/2022-02-02-1643842568-blobless.bundle` + +Advertising Bundle URIs +----------------------- + +If a user knows a bundle URI for the repository they are cloning, then +they can specify that URI manually through a command-line option. However, +a Git host may want to advertise bundle URIs during the clone operation, +helping users unaware of the feature. + +The only thing required for this feature is that the server can advertise +one or more bundle URIs. This advertisement takes the form of a new +protocol v2 capability specifically for discovering bundle URIs. + +The client could choose an arbitrary bundle URI as an option _or_ select +the URI with best performance by some exploratory checks. It is up to the +bundle provider to decide if having multiple URIs is preferable to a +single URI that is geodistributed through server-side infrastructure. + +Cloning with Bundle URIs +------------------------ + +The primary need for bundle URIs is to speed up clones. The Git client +will interact with bundle URIs according to the following flow: + +1. The user specifies a bundle URI with the `--bundle-uri` command-line + option _or_ the client discovers a bundle list advertised by the + Git server. + +2. If the downloaded data from a bundle URI is a bundle, then the client + inspects the bundle headers to check that the prerequisite commit OIDs + are present in the client repository. If some are missing, then the + client delays unbundling until other bundles have been unbundled, + making those OIDs present. When all required OIDs are present, the + client unbundles that data using a refspec. The default refspec is + `+refs/heads/*:refs/bundles/*`, but this can be configured. These refs + are stored so that later `git fetch` negotiations can communicate each + bundled ref as a `have`, reducing the size of the fetch over the Git + protocol. To allow pruning refs from this ref namespace, Git may + introduce a numbered namespace (such as `refs/bundles/<i>/*`) such that + stale bundle refs can be deleted. + +3. If the file is instead a bundle list, then the client inspects the + `bundle.mode` to see if the list is of the `all` or `any` form. + + a. If `bundle.mode=all`, then the client considers all bundle + URIs. The list is reduced based on the `bundle.<id>.filter` options + matching the client repository's partial clone filter. Then, all + bundle URIs are requested. If the `bundle.<id>.creationToken` + heuristic is provided, then the bundles are downloaded in decreasing + order by the creation token, stopping when a bundle has all required + OIDs. The bundles can then be unbundled in increasing creation token + order. The client stores the latest creation token as a heuristic + for avoiding future downloads if the bundle list does not advertise + bundles with larger creation tokens. + + b. If `bundle.mode=any`, then the client can choose any one of the + bundle URIs to inspect. The client can use a variety of ways to + choose among these URIs. The client can also fallback to another URI + if the initial choice fails to return a result. + +Note that during a clone we expect that all bundles will be required, and +heuristics such as `bundle.<uri>.creationToken` can be used to download +bundles in chronological order or in parallel. + +If a given bundle URI is a bundle list with a `bundle.heuristic` +value, then the client can choose to store that URI as its chosen bundle +URI. The client can then navigate directly to that URI during later `git +fetch` calls. + +When downloading bundle URIs, the client can choose to inspect the initial +content before committing to downloading the entire content. This may +provide enough information to determine if the URI is a bundle list or +a bundle. In the case of a bundle, the client may inspect the bundle +header to determine that all advertised tips are already in the client +repository and cancel the remaining download. + +Fetching with Bundle URIs +------------------------- + +When the client fetches new data, it can decide to fetch from bundle +servers before fetching from the origin remote. This could be done via a +command-line option, but it is more likely useful to use a config value +such as the one specified during the clone. + +The fetch operation follows the same procedure to download bundles from a +bundle list (although we do _not_ want to use parallel downloads here). We +expect that the process will end when all prerequisite commit OIDs in a +thin bundle are already in the object database. + +When using the `creationToken` heuristic, the client can avoid downloading +any bundles if their creation tokens are not larger than the stored +creation token. After fetching new bundles, Git updates this local +creation token. + +If the bundle provider does not provide a heuristic, then the client +should attempt to inspect the bundle headers before downloading the full +bundle data in case the bundle tips already exist in the client +repository. + +Error Conditions +---------------- + +If the Git client discovers something unexpected while downloading +information according to a bundle URI or the bundle list found at that +location, then Git can ignore that data and continue as if it was not +given a bundle URI. The remote Git server is the ultimate source of truth, +not the bundle URI. + +Here are a few example error conditions: + +* The client fails to connect with a server at the given URI or a connection + is lost without any chance to recover. + +* The client receives a 400-level response (such as `404 Not Found` or + `401 Not Authorized`). The client should use the credential helper to + find and provide a credential for the URI, but match the semantics of + Git's other HTTP protocols in terms of handling specific 400-level + errors. + +* The server reports any other failure response. + +* The client receives data that is not parsable as a bundle or bundle list. + +* A bundle includes a filter that does not match expectations. + +* The client cannot unbundle the bundles because the prerequisite commit OIDs + are not in the object database and there are no more bundles to download. + +There are also situations that could be seen as wasteful, but are not +error conditions: + +* The downloaded bundles contain more information than is requested by + the clone or fetch request. A primary example is if the user requests + a clone with `--single-branch` but downloads bundles that store every + reachable commit from all `refs/heads/*` references. This might be + initially wasteful, but perhaps these objects will become reachable by + a later ref update that the client cares about. + +* A bundle download during a `git fetch` contains objects already in the + object database. This is probably unavoidable if we are using bundles + for fetches, since the client will almost always be slightly ahead of + the bundle servers after performing its "catch-up" fetch to the remote + server. This extra work is most wasteful when the client is fetching + much more frequently than the server is computing bundles, such as if + the client is using hourly prefetches with background maintenance, but + the server is computing bundles weekly. For this reason, the client + should not use bundle URIs for fetch unless the server has explicitly + recommended it through a `bundle.heuristic` value. + +Example Bundle Provider organization +------------------------------------ + +The bundle URI feature is intentionally designed to be flexible to +different ways a bundle provider wants to organize the object data. +However, it can be helpful to have a complete organization model described +here so providers can start from that base. + +This example organization is a simplified model of what is used by the +GVFS Cache Servers (see section near the end of this document) which have +been beneficial in speeding up clones and fetches for very large +repositories, although using extra software outside of Git. + +The bundle provider deploys servers across multiple geographies. Each +server manages its own bundle set. The server can track a number of Git +repositories, but provides a bundle list for each based on a pattern. For +example, when mirroring a repository at `https://<domain>/<org>/<repo>` +the bundle server could have its bundle list available at +`https://<server-url>/<domain>/<org>/<repo>`. The origin Git server can +list all of these servers under the "any" mode: + + [bundle] + version = 1 + mode = any + + [bundle "eastus"] + uri = https://eastus.example.com/<domain>/<org>/<repo> + + [bundle "europe"] + uri = https://europe.example.com/<domain>/<org>/<repo> + + [bundle "apac"] + uri = https://apac.example.com/<domain>/<org>/<repo> + +This "list of lists" is static and only changes if a bundle server is +added or removed. + +Each bundle server manages its own set of bundles. The initial bundle list +contains only a single bundle, containing all of the objects received from +cloning the repository from the origin server. The list uses the +`creationToken` heuristic and a `creationToken` is made for the bundle +based on the server's timestamp. + +The bundle server runs regularly-scheduled updates for the bundle list, +such as once a day. During this task, the server fetches the latest +contents from the origin server and generates a bundle containing the +objects reachable from the latest origin refs, but not contained in a +previously-computed bundle. This bundle is added to the list, with care +that the `creationToken` is strictly greater than the previous maximum +`creationToken`. + +When the bundle list grows too large, say more than 30 bundles, then the +oldest "_N_ minus 30" bundles are combined into a single bundle. This +bundle's `creationToken` is equal to the maximum `creationToken` among the +merged bundles. + +An example bundle list is provided here, although it only has two daily +bundles and not a full list of 30: + + [bundle] + version = 1 + mode = all + heuristic = creationToken + + [bundle "2022-02-13-1644770820-daily"] + uri = https://eastus.example.com/<domain>/<org>/<repo>/2022-02-09-1644770820-daily.bundle + creationToken = 1644770820 + + [bundle "2022-02-09-1644442601-daily"] + uri = https://eastus.example.com/<domain>/<org>/<repo>/2022-02-09-1644442601-daily.bundle + creationToken = 1644442601 + + [bundle "2022-02-02-1643842562"] + uri = https://eastus.example.com/<domain>/<org>/<repo>/2022-02-02-1643842562.bundle + creationToken = 1643842562 + +To avoid storing and serving object data in perpetuity despite becoming +unreachable in the origin server, this bundle merge can be more careful. +Instead of taking an absolute union of the old bundles, instead the bundle +can be created by looking at the newer bundles and ensuring that their +necessary commits are all available in this merged bundle (or in another +one of the newer bundles). This allows "expiring" object data that is not +being used by new commits in this window of time. That data could be +reintroduced by a later push. + +The intention of this data organization has two main goals. First, initial +clones of the repository become faster by downloading precomputed object +data from a closer source. Second, `git fetch` commands can be faster, +especially if the client has not fetched for a few days. However, if a +client does not fetch for 30 days, then the bundle list organization would +cause redownloading a large amount of object data. + +One way to make this organization more useful to users who fetch frequently +is to have more frequent bundle creation. For example, bundles could be +created every hour, and then once a day those "hourly" bundles could be +merged into a "daily" bundle. The daily bundles are merged into the +oldest bundle after 30 days. + +It is recommended that this bundle strategy is repeated with the `blob:none` +filter if clients of this repository are expecting to use blobless partial +clones. This list of blobless bundles stays in the same list as the full +bundles, but uses the `bundle.<id>.filter` key to separate the two groups. +For very large repositories, the bundle provider may want to _only_ provide +blobless bundles. + +Implementation Plan +------------------- + +This design document is being submitted on its own as an aspirational +document, with the goal of implementing all of the mentioned client +features over the course of several patch series. Here is a potential +outline for submitting these features: + +1. Integrate bundle URIs into `git clone` with a `--bundle-uri` option. + This will include a new `git fetch --bundle-uri` mode for use as the + implementation underneath `git clone`. The initial version here will + expect a single bundle at the given URI. + +2. Implement the ability to parse a bundle list from a bundle URI and + update the `git fetch --bundle-uri` logic to properly distinguish + between `bundle.mode` options. Specifically design the feature so + that the config format parsing feeds a list of key-value pairs into the + bundle list logic. + +3. Create the `bundle-uri` protocol v2 command so Git servers can advertise + bundle URIs using the key-value pairs. Plug into the existing key-value + input to the bundle list logic. Allow `git clone` to discover these + bundle URIs and bootstrap the client repository from the bundle data. + (This choice is an opt-in via a config option and a command-line + option.) + +4. Allow the client to understand the `bundle.flag=forFetch` configuration + and the `bundle.<id>.creationToken` heuristic. When `git clone` + discovers a bundle URI with `bundle.flag=forFetch`, it configures the + client repository to check that bundle URI during later `git fetch <remote>` + commands. + +5. Allow clients to discover bundle URIs during `git fetch` and configure + a bundle URI for later fetches if `bundle.flag=forFetch`. + +6. Implement the "inspect headers" heuristic to reduce data downloads when + the `bundle.<id>.creationToken` heuristic is not available. + +As these features are reviewed, this plan might be updated. We also expect +that new designs will be discovered and implemented as this feature +matures and becomes used in real-world scenarios. + +Related Work: Packfile URIs +--------------------------- + +The Git protocol already has a capability where the Git server can list +a set of URLs along with the packfile response when serving a client +request. The client is then expected to download the packfiles at those +locations in order to have a complete understanding of the response. + +This mechanism is used by the Gerrit server (implemented with JGit) and +has been effective at reducing CPU load and improving user performance for +clones. + +A major downside to this mechanism is that the origin server needs to know +_exactly_ what is in those packfiles, and the packfiles need to be available +to the user for some time after the server has responded. This coupling +between the origin and the packfile data is difficult to manage. + +Further, this implementation is extremely hard to make work with fetches. + +Related Work: GVFS Cache Servers +-------------------------------- + +The GVFS Protocol [2] is a set of HTTP endpoints designed independently of +the Git project before Git's partial clone was created. One feature of this +protocol is the idea of a "cache server" which can be colocated with build +machines or developer offices to transfer Git data without overloading the +central server. + +The endpoint that VFS for Git is famous for is the `GET /gvfs/objects/{oid}` +endpoint, which allows downloading an object on-demand. This is a critical +piece of the filesystem virtualization of that product. + +However, a more subtle need is the `GET /gvfs/prefetch?lastPackTimestamp=<t>` +endpoint. Given an optional timestamp, the cache server responds with a list +of precomputed packfiles containing the commits and trees that were introduced +in those time intervals. + +The cache server computes these "prefetch" packfiles using the following +strategy: + +1. Every hour, an "hourly" pack is generated with a given timestamp. +2. Nightly, the previous 24 hourly packs are rolled up into a "daily" pack. +3. Nightly, all prefetch packs more than 30 days old are rolled up into + one pack. + +When a user runs `gvfs clone` or `scalar clone` against a repo with cache +servers, the client requests all prefetch packfiles, which is at most +`24 + 30 + 1` packfiles downloading only commits and trees. The client +then follows with a request to the origin server for the references, and +attempts to checkout that tip reference. (There is an extra endpoint that +helps get all reachable trees from a given commit, in case that commit +was not already in a prefetch packfile.) + +During a `git fetch`, a hook requests the prefetch endpoint using the +most-recent timestamp from a previously-downloaded prefetch packfile. +Only the list of packfiles with later timestamps are downloaded. Most +users fetch hourly, so they get at most one hourly prefetch pack. Users +whose machines have been off or otherwise have not fetched in over 30 days +might redownload all prefetch packfiles. This is rare. + +It is important to note that the clients always contact the origin server +for the refs advertisement, so the refs are frequently "ahead" of the +prefetched pack data. The missing objects are downloaded on-demand using +the `GET gvfs/objects/{oid}` requests, when needed by a command such as +`git checkout` or `git log`. Some Git optimizations disable checks that +would cause these on-demand downloads to be too aggressive. + +See Also +-------- + +[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/RFC-cover-00.13-0000000000-20210805T150534Z-avarab@gmail.com/ + An earlier RFC for a bundle URI feature. + +[2] https://github.com/microsoft/VFSForGit/blob/master/Protocol.md + The GVFS Protocol diff --git a/Documentation/technical/commit-graph.txt b/Documentation/technical/commit-graph.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..86fed0d --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/commit-graph.txt @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ +Git Commit-Graph Design Notes +============================= + +Git walks the commit graph for many reasons, including: + +1. Listing and filtering commit history. +2. Computing merge bases. + +These operations can become slow as the commit count grows. The merge +base calculation shows up in many user-facing commands, such as 'merge-base' +or 'status' and can take minutes to compute depending on history shape. + +There are two main costs here: + +1. Decompressing and parsing commits. +2. Walking the entire graph to satisfy topological order constraints. + +The commit-graph file is a supplemental data structure that accelerates +commit graph walks. If a user downgrades or disables the 'core.commitGraph' +config setting, then the existing object database is sufficient. The file is stored +as "commit-graph" either in the .git/objects/info directory or in the info +directory of an alternate. + +The commit-graph file stores the commit graph structure along with some +extra metadata to speed up graph walks. By listing commit OIDs in +lexicographic order, we can identify an integer position for each commit +and refer to the parents of a commit using those integer positions. We +use binary search to find initial commits and then use the integer +positions for fast lookups during the walk. + +A consumer may load the following info for a commit from the graph: + +1. The commit OID. +2. The list of parents, along with their integer position. +3. The commit date. +4. The root tree OID. +5. The generation number (see definition below). + +Values 1-4 satisfy the requirements of parse_commit_gently(). + +There are two definitions of generation number: +1. Corrected committer dates (generation number v2) +2. Topological levels (generation number v1) + +Define "corrected committer date" of a commit recursively as follows: + + * A commit with no parents (a root commit) has corrected committer date + equal to its committer date. + + * A commit with at least one parent has corrected committer date equal to + the maximum of its committer date and one more than the largest corrected + committer date among its parents. + + * As a special case, a root commit with timestamp zero has corrected commit + date of 1, to be able to distinguish it from GENERATION_NUMBER_ZERO + (that is, an uncomputed corrected commit date). + +Define the "topological level" of a commit recursively as follows: + + * A commit with no parents (a root commit) has topological level of one. + + * A commit with at least one parent has topological level one more than + the largest topological level among its parents. + +Equivalently, the topological level of a commit A is one more than the +length of a longest path from A to a root commit. The recursive definition +is easier to use for computation and observing the following property: + + If A and B are commits with generation numbers N and M, respectively, + and N <= M, then A cannot reach B. That is, we know without searching + that B is not an ancestor of A because it is further from a root commit + than A. + + Conversely, when checking if A is an ancestor of B, then we only need + to walk commits until all commits on the walk boundary have generation + number at most N. If we walk commits using a priority queue seeded by + generation numbers, then we always expand the boundary commit with highest + generation number and can easily detect the stopping condition. + +The property applies to both versions of generation number, that is both +corrected committer dates and topological levels. + +This property can be used to significantly reduce the time it takes to +walk commits and determine topological relationships. Without generation +numbers, the general heuristic is the following: + + If A and B are commits with commit time X and Y, respectively, and + X < Y, then A _probably_ cannot reach B. + +In absence of corrected commit dates (for example, old versions of Git or +mixed generation graph chains), +this heuristic is currently used whenever the computation is allowed to +violate topological relationships due to clock skew (such as "git log" +with default order), but is not used when the topological order is +required (such as merge base calculations, "git log --graph"). + +In practice, we expect some commits to be created recently and not stored +in the commit-graph. We can treat these commits as having "infinite" +generation number and walk until reaching commits with known generation +number. + +We use the macro GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY to mark commits not +in the commit-graph file. If a commit-graph file was written by a version +of Git that did not compute generation numbers, then those commits will +have generation number represented by the macro GENERATION_NUMBER_ZERO = 0. + +Since the commit-graph file is closed under reachability, we can guarantee +the following weaker condition on all commits: + + If A and B are commits with generation numbers N and M, respectively, + and N < M, then A cannot reach B. + +Note how the strict inequality differs from the inequality when we have +fully-computed generation numbers. Using strict inequality may result in +walking a few extra commits, but the simplicity in dealing with commits +with generation number *_INFINITY or *_ZERO is valuable. + +We use the macro GENERATION_NUMBER_V1_MAX = 0x3FFFFFFF for commits whose +topological levels (generation number v1) are computed to be at least +this value. We limit at this value since it is the largest value that +can be stored in the commit-graph file using the 30 bits available +to topological levels. This presents another case where a commit can +have generation number equal to that of a parent. + +Design Details +-------------- + +- The commit-graph file is stored in a file named 'commit-graph' in the + .git/objects/info directory. This could be stored in the info directory + of an alternate. + +- The core.commitGraph config setting must be on to consume graph files. + +- The file format includes parameters for the object ID hash function, + so a future change of hash algorithm does not require a change in format. + +- Commit grafts and replace objects can change the shape of the commit + history. The latter can also be enabled/disabled on the fly using + `--no-replace-objects`. This leads to difficultly storing both possible + interpretations of a commit id, especially when computing generation + numbers. The commit-graph will not be read or written when + replace-objects or grafts are present. + +- Shallow clones create grafts of commits by dropping their parents. This + leads the commit-graph to think those commits have generation number 1. + If and when those commits are made unshallow, those generation numbers + become invalid. Since shallow clones are intended to restrict the commit + history to a very small set of commits, the commit-graph feature is less + helpful for these clones, anyway. The commit-graph will not be read or + written when shallow commits are present. + +Commit-Graphs Chains +-------------------- + +Typically, repos grow with near-constant velocity (commits per day). Over time, +the number of commits added by a fetch operation is much smaller than the +number of commits in the full history. By creating a "chain" of commit-graphs, +we enable fast writes of new commit data without rewriting the entire commit +history -- at least, most of the time. + +## File Layout + +A commit-graph chain uses multiple files, and we use a fixed naming convention +to organize these files. Each commit-graph file has a name +`$OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/graph-{hash}.graph` where `{hash}` is the hex- +valued hash stored in the footer of that file (which is a hash of the file's +contents before that hash). For a chain of commit-graph files, a plain-text +file at `$OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/commit-graph-chain` contains the +hashes for the files in order from "lowest" to "highest". + +For example, if the `commit-graph-chain` file contains the lines + +``` + {hash0} + {hash1} + {hash2} +``` + +then the commit-graph chain looks like the following diagram: + + +-----------------------+ + | graph-{hash2}.graph | + +-----------------------+ + | + +-----------------------+ + | | + | graph-{hash1}.graph | + | | + +-----------------------+ + | + +-----------------------+ + | | + | | + | | + | graph-{hash0}.graph | + | | + | | + | | + +-----------------------+ + +Let X0 be the number of commits in `graph-{hash0}.graph`, X1 be the number of +commits in `graph-{hash1}.graph`, and X2 be the number of commits in +`graph-{hash2}.graph`. If a commit appears in position i in `graph-{hash2}.graph`, +then we interpret this as being the commit in position (X0 + X1 + i), and that +will be used as its "graph position". The commits in `graph-{hash2}.graph` use these +positions to refer to their parents, which may be in `graph-{hash1}.graph` or +`graph-{hash0}.graph`. We can navigate to an arbitrary commit in position j by checking +its containment in the intervals [0, X0), [X0, X0 + X1), [X0 + X1, X0 + X1 + +X2). + +Each commit-graph file (except the base, `graph-{hash0}.graph`) contains data +specifying the hashes of all files in the lower layers. In the above example, +`graph-{hash1}.graph` contains `{hash0}` while `graph-{hash2}.graph` contains +`{hash0}` and `{hash1}`. + +## Merging commit-graph files + +If we only added a new commit-graph file on every write, we would run into a +linear search problem through many commit-graph files. Instead, we use a merge +strategy to decide when the stack should collapse some number of levels. + +The diagram below shows such a collapse. As a set of new commits are added, it +is determined by the merge strategy that the files should collapse to +`graph-{hash1}`. Thus, the new commits, the commits in `graph-{hash2}` and +the commits in `graph-{hash1}` should be combined into a new `graph-{hash3}` +file. + + +---------------------+ + | | + | (new commits) | + | | + +---------------------+ + | | + +-----------------------+ +---------------------+ + | graph-{hash2} |->| | + +-----------------------+ +---------------------+ + | | | + +-----------------------+ +---------------------+ + | | | | + | graph-{hash1} |->| | + | | | | + +-----------------------+ +---------------------+ + | tmp_graphXXX + +-----------------------+ + | | + | | + | | + | graph-{hash0} | + | | + | | + | | + +-----------------------+ + +During this process, the commits to write are combined, sorted and we write the +contents to a temporary file, all while holding a `commit-graph-chain.lock` +lock-file. When the file is flushed, we rename it to `graph-{hash3}` +according to the computed `{hash3}`. Finally, we write the new chain data to +`commit-graph-chain.lock`: + +``` + {hash3} + {hash0} +``` + +We then close the lock-file. + +## Merge Strategy + +When writing a set of commits that do not exist in the commit-graph stack of +height N, we default to creating a new file at level N + 1. We then decide to +merge with the Nth level if one of two conditions hold: + + 1. `--size-multiple=<X>` is specified or X = 2, and the number of commits in + level N is less than X times the number of commits in level N + 1. + + 2. `--max-commits=<C>` is specified with non-zero C and the number of commits + in level N + 1 is more than C commits. + +This decision cascades down the levels: when we merge a level we create a new +set of commits that then compares to the next level. + +The first condition bounds the number of levels to be logarithmic in the total +number of commits. The second condition bounds the total number of commits in +a `graph-{hashN}` file and not in the `commit-graph` file, preventing +significant performance issues when the stack merges and another process only +partially reads the previous stack. + +The merge strategy values (2 for the size multiple, 64,000 for the maximum +number of commits) could be extracted into config settings for full +flexibility. + +## Handling Mixed Generation Number Chains + +With the introduction of generation number v2 and generation data chunk, the +following scenario is possible: + +1. "New" Git writes a commit-graph with the corrected commit dates. +2. "Old" Git writes a split commit-graph on top without corrected commit dates. + +A naive approach of using the newest available generation number from +each layer would lead to violated expectations: the lower layer would +use corrected commit dates which are much larger than the topological +levels of the higher layer. For this reason, Git inspects the topmost +layer to see if the layer is missing corrected commit dates. In such a case +Git only uses topological level for generation numbers. + +When writing a new layer in split commit-graph, we write corrected commit +dates if the topmost layer has corrected commit dates written. This +guarantees that if a layer has corrected commit dates, all lower layers +must have corrected commit dates as well. + +When merging layers, we do not consider whether the merged layers had corrected +commit dates. Instead, the new layer will have corrected commit dates if the +layer below the new layer has corrected commit dates. + +While writing or merging layers, if the new layer is the only layer, it will +have corrected commit dates when written by compatible versions of Git. Thus, +rewriting split commit-graph as a single file (`--split=replace`) creates a +single layer with corrected commit dates. + +## Deleting graph-{hash} files + +After a new tip file is written, some `graph-{hash}` files may no longer +be part of a chain. It is important to remove these files from disk, eventually. +The main reason to delay removal is that another process could read the +`commit-graph-chain` file before it is rewritten, but then look for the +`graph-{hash}` files after they are deleted. + +To allow holding old split commit-graphs for a while after they are unreferenced, +we update the modified times of the files when they become unreferenced. Then, +we scan the `$OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/` directory for `graph-{hash}` +files whose modified times are older than a given expiry window. This window +defaults to zero, but can be changed using command-line arguments or a config +setting. + +## Chains across multiple object directories + +In a repo with alternates, we look for the `commit-graph-chain` file starting +in the local object directory and then in each alternate. The first file that +exists defines our chain. As we look for the `graph-{hash}` files for +each `{hash}` in the chain file, we follow the same pattern for the host +directories. + +This allows commit-graphs to be split across multiple forks in a fork network. +The typical case is a large "base" repo with many smaller forks. + +As the base repo advances, it will likely update and merge its commit-graph +chain more frequently than the forks. If a fork updates their commit-graph after +the base repo, then it should "reparent" the commit-graph chain onto the new +chain in the base repo. When reading each `graph-{hash}` file, we track +the object directory containing it. During a write of a new commit-graph file, +we check for any changes in the source object directory and read the +`commit-graph-chain` file for that source and create a new file based on those +files. During this "reparent" operation, we necessarily need to collapse all +levels in the fork, as all of the files are invalid against the new base file. + +It is crucial to be careful when cleaning up "unreferenced" `graph-{hash}.graph` +files in this scenario. It falls to the user to define the proper settings for +their custom environment: + + 1. When merging levels in the base repo, the unreferenced files may still be + referenced by chains from fork repos. + + 2. The expiry time should be set to a length of time such that every fork has + time to recompute their commit-graph chain to "reparent" onto the new base + file(s). + + 3. If the commit-graph chain is updated in the base, the fork will not have + access to the new chain until its chain is updated to reference those files. + (This may change in the future [5].) + +Related Links +------------- +[0] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/git/issues/detail?id=8 + Chromium work item for: Serialized Commit Graph + +[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20110713070517.GC18566@sigill.intra.peff.net/ + An abandoned patch that introduced generation numbers. + +[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20170908033403.q7e6dj7benasrjes@sigill.intra.peff.net/ + Discussion about generation numbers on commits and how they interact + with fsck. + +[3] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20170908034739.4op3w4f2ma5s65ku@sigill.intra.peff.net/ + More discussion about generation numbers and not storing them inside + commit objects. A valuable quote: + + "I think we should be moving more in the direction of keeping + repo-local caches for optimizations. Reachability bitmaps have been + a big performance win. I think we should be doing the same with our + properties of commits. Not just generation numbers, but making it + cheap to access the graph structure without zlib-inflating whole + commit objects (i.e., packv4 or something like the "metapacks" I + proposed a few years ago)." + +[4] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180108154822.54829-1-git@jeffhostetler.com/T/#u + A patch to remove the ahead-behind calculation from 'status'. + +[5] https://lore.kernel.org/git/f27db281-abad-5043-6d71-cbb083b1c877@gmail.com/ + A discussion of a "two-dimensional graph position" that can allow reading + multiple commit-graph chains at the same time. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/directory-rename-detection.txt b/Documentation/technical/directory-rename-detection.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..029ee2c --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/directory-rename-detection.txt @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +Directory rename detection +========================== + +Rename detection logic in diffcore-rename that checks for renames of +individual files is also aggregated there and then analyzed in either +merge-ort or merge-recursive for cases where combinations of renames +indicate that a full directory has been renamed. + +Scope of abilities +------------------ + +It is perhaps easiest to start with an example: + + * When all of x/a, x/b and x/c have moved to z/a, z/b and z/c, it is + likely that x/d added in the meantime would also want to move to z/d by + taking the hint that the entire directory 'x' moved to 'z'. + +More interesting possibilities exist, though, such as: + + * one side of history renames x -> z, and the other renames some file to + x/e, causing the need for the merge to do a transitive rename so that + the rename ends up at z/e. + + * one side of history renames x -> z, but also renames all files within x. + For example, x/a -> z/alpha, x/b -> z/bravo, etc. + + * both 'x' and 'y' being merged into a single directory 'z', with a + directory rename being detected for both x->z and y->z. + + * not all files in a directory being renamed to the same location; + i.e. perhaps most the files in 'x' are now found under 'z', but a few + are found under 'w'. + + * a directory being renamed, which also contained a subdirectory that was + renamed to some entirely different location. (And perhaps the inner + directory itself contained inner directories that were renamed to yet + other locations). + + * combinations of the above; see t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh for + various interesting cases. + +Limitations -- applicability of directory renames +------------------------------------------------- + +In order to prevent edge and corner cases resulting in either conflicts +that cannot be represented in the index or which might be too complex for +users to try to understand and resolve, a couple basic rules limit when +directory rename detection applies: + + 1) If a given directory still exists on both sides of a merge, we do + not consider it to have been renamed. + + 2) If a subset of to-be-renamed files have a file or directory in the + way (or would be in the way of each other), "turn off" the directory + rename for those specific sub-paths and report the conflict to the + user. + + 3) If the other side of history did a directory rename to a path that + your side of history renamed away, then ignore that particular + rename from the other side of history for any implicit directory + renames (but warn the user). + +Limitations -- detailed rules and testcases +------------------------------------------- + +t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh contains extensive tests and commentary +which generate and explore the rules listed above. It also lists a few +additional rules: + + a) If renames split a directory into two or more others, the directory + with the most renames, "wins". + + b) Only apply implicit directory renames to directories if the other side + of history is the one doing the renaming. + + c) Do not perform directory rename detection for directories which had no + new paths added to them. + +Limitations -- support in different commands +-------------------------------------------- + +Directory rename detection is supported by 'merge' and 'cherry-pick'. +Other git commands which users might be surprised to see limited or no +directory rename detection support in: + + * diff + + Folks have requested in the past that `git diff` detect directory + renames and somehow simplify its output. It is not clear whether this + would be desirable or how the output should be simplified, so this was + simply not implemented. Also, while diffcore-rename has most of the + logic for detecting directory renames, some of the logic is still found + within merge-ort and merge-recursive. Fully supporting directory + rename detection in diffs would require copying or moving the remaining + bits of logic to the diff machinery. + + * am + + git-am tries to avoid a full three way merge, instead calling + git-apply. That prevents us from detecting renames at all, which may + defeat the directory rename detection. There is a fallback, though; if + the initial git-apply fails and the user has specified the -3 option, + git-am will fall back to a three way merge. However, git-am lacks the + necessary information to do a "real" three way merge. Instead, it has + to use build_fake_ancestor() to get a merge base that is missing files + whose rename may have been important to detect for directory rename + detection to function. + + * rebase + + Since am-based rebases work by first generating a bunch of patches + (which no longer record what the original commits were and thus don't + have the necessary info from which we can find a real merge-base), and + then calling git-am, this implies that am-based rebases will not always + successfully detect directory renames either (see the 'am' section + above). merged-based rebases (rebase -m) and cherry-pick-based rebases + (rebase -i) are not affected by this shortcoming, and fully support + directory rename detection. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/hash-function-transition.txt b/Documentation/technical/hash-function-transition.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e2ac36d --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/hash-function-transition.txt @@ -0,0 +1,830 @@ +Git hash function transition +============================ + +Objective +--------- +Migrate Git from SHA-1 to a stronger hash function. + +Background +---------- +At its core, the Git version control system is a content addressable +filesystem. It uses the SHA-1 hash function to name content. For +example, files, directories, and revisions are referred to by hash +values unlike in other traditional version control systems where files +or versions are referred to via sequential numbers. The use of a hash +function to address its content delivers a few advantages: + +* Integrity checking is easy. Bit flips, for example, are easily + detected, as the hash of corrupted content does not match its name. +* Lookup of objects is fast. + +Using a cryptographically secure hash function brings additional +advantages: + +* Object names can be signed and third parties can trust the hash to + address the signed object and all objects it references. +* Communication using Git protocol and out of band communication + methods have a short reliable string that can be used to reliably + address stored content. + +Over time some flaws in SHA-1 have been discovered by security +researchers. On 23 February 2017 the SHAttered attack +(https://shattered.io) demonstrated a practical SHA-1 hash collision. + +Git v2.13.0 and later subsequently moved to a hardened SHA-1 +implementation by default, which isn't vulnerable to the SHAttered +attack, but SHA-1 is still weak. + +Thus it's considered prudent to move past any variant of SHA-1 +to a new hash. There's no guarantee that future attacks on SHA-1 won't +be published in the future, and those attacks may not have viable +mitigations. + +If SHA-1 and its variants were to be truly broken, Git's hash function +could not be considered cryptographically secure any more. This would +impact the communication of hash values because we could not trust +that a given hash value represented the known good version of content +that the speaker intended. + +SHA-1 still possesses the other properties such as fast object lookup +and safe error checking, but other hash functions are equally suitable +that are believed to be cryptographically secure. + +Choice of Hash +-------------- +The hash to replace the hardened SHA-1 should be stronger than SHA-1 +was: we would like it to be trustworthy and useful in practice for at +least 10 years. + +Some other relevant properties: + +1. A 256-bit hash (long enough to match common security practice; not + excessively long to hurt performance and disk usage). + +2. High quality implementations should be widely available (e.g., in + OpenSSL and Apple CommonCrypto). + +3. The hash function's properties should match Git's needs (e.g. Git + requires collision and 2nd preimage resistance and does not require + length extension resistance). + +4. As a tiebreaker, the hash should be fast to compute (fortunately + many contenders are faster than SHA-1). + +There were several contenders for a successor hash to SHA-1, including +SHA-256, SHA-512/256, SHA-256x16, K12, and BLAKE2bp-256. + +In late 2018 the project picked SHA-256 as its successor hash. + +See 0ed8d8da374 (doc hash-function-transition: pick SHA-256 as +NewHash, 2018-08-04) and numerous mailing list threads at the time, +particularly the one starting at +https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180609224913.GC38834@genre.crustytoothpaste.net/ +for more information. + +Goals +----- +1. The transition to SHA-256 can be done one local repository at a time. + a. Requiring no action by any other party. + b. A SHA-256 repository can communicate with SHA-1 Git servers + (push/fetch). + c. Users can use SHA-1 and SHA-256 identifiers for objects + interchangeably (see "Object names on the command line", below). + d. New signed objects make use of a stronger hash function than + SHA-1 for their security guarantees. +2. Allow a complete transition away from SHA-1. + a. Local metadata for SHA-1 compatibility can be removed from a + repository if compatibility with SHA-1 is no longer needed. +3. Maintainability throughout the process. + a. The object format is kept simple and consistent. + b. Creation of a generalized repository conversion tool. + +Non-Goals +--------- +1. Add SHA-256 support to Git protocol. This is valuable and the + logical next step but it is out of scope for this initial design. +2. Transparently improving the security of existing SHA-1 signed + objects. +3. Intermixing objects using multiple hash functions in a single + repository. +4. Taking the opportunity to fix other bugs in Git's formats and + protocols. +5. Shallow clones and fetches into a SHA-256 repository. (This will + change when we add SHA-256 support to Git protocol.) +6. Skip fetching some submodules of a project into a SHA-256 + repository. (This also depends on SHA-256 support in Git + protocol.) + +Overview +-------- +We introduce a new repository format extension. Repositories with this +extension enabled use SHA-256 instead of SHA-1 to name their objects. +This affects both object names and object content -- both the names +of objects and all references to other objects within an object are +switched to the new hash function. + +SHA-256 repositories cannot be read by older versions of Git. + +Alongside the packfile, a SHA-256 repository stores a bidirectional +mapping between SHA-256 and SHA-1 object names. The mapping is generated +locally and can be verified using "git fsck". Object lookups use this +mapping to allow naming objects using either their SHA-1 and SHA-256 names +interchangeably. + +"git cat-file" and "git hash-object" gain options to display an object +in its SHA-1 form and write an object given its SHA-1 form. This +requires all objects referenced by that object to be present in the +object database so that they can be named using the appropriate name +(using the bidirectional hash mapping). + +Fetches from a SHA-1 based server convert the fetched objects into +SHA-256 form and record the mapping in the bidirectional mapping table +(see below for details). Pushes to a SHA-1 based server convert the +objects being pushed into SHA-1 form so the server does not have to be +aware of the hash function the client is using. + +Detailed Design +--------------- +Repository format extension +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +A SHA-256 repository uses repository format version `1` (see +Documentation/technical/repository-version.txt) with extensions +`objectFormat` and `compatObjectFormat`: + + [core] + repositoryFormatVersion = 1 + [extensions] + objectFormat = sha256 + compatObjectFormat = sha1 + +The combination of setting `core.repositoryFormatVersion=1` and +populating `extensions.*` ensures that all versions of Git later than +`v0.99.9l` will die instead of trying to operate on the SHA-256 +repository, instead producing an error message. + + # Between v0.99.9l and v2.7.0 + $ git status + fatal: Expected git repo version <= 0, found 1 + # After v2.7.0 + $ git status + fatal: unknown repository extensions found: + objectformat + compatobjectformat + +See the "Transition plan" section below for more details on these +repository extensions. + +Object names +~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Objects can be named by their 40 hexadecimal digit SHA-1 name or 64 +hexadecimal digit SHA-256 name, plus names derived from those (see +gitrevisions(7)). + +The SHA-1 name of an object is the SHA-1 of the concatenation of its +type, length, a nul byte, and the object's SHA-1 content. This is the +traditional <sha1> used in Git to name objects. + +The SHA-256 name of an object is the SHA-256 of the concatenation of its +type, length, a nul byte, and the object's SHA-256 content. + +Object format +~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +The content as a byte sequence of a tag, commit, or tree object named +by SHA-1 and SHA-256 differ because an object named by SHA-256 name refers to +other objects by their SHA-256 names and an object named by SHA-1 name +refers to other objects by their SHA-1 names. + +The SHA-256 content of an object is the same as its SHA-1 content, except +that objects referenced by the object are named using their SHA-256 names +instead of SHA-1 names. Because a blob object does not refer to any +other object, its SHA-1 content and SHA-256 content are the same. + +The format allows round-trip conversion between SHA-256 content and +SHA-1 content. + +Object storage +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Loose objects use zlib compression and packed objects use the packed +format described in linkgit:gitformat-pack[5], just like +today. The content that is compressed and stored uses SHA-256 content +instead of SHA-1 content. + +Pack index +~~~~~~~~~~ +Pack index (.idx) files use a new v3 format that supports multiple +hash functions. They have the following format (all integers are in +network byte order): + +- A header appears at the beginning and consists of the following: + * The 4-byte pack index signature: '\377t0c' + * 4-byte version number: 3 + * 4-byte length of the header section, including the signature and + version number + * 4-byte number of objects contained in the pack + * 4-byte number of object formats in this pack index: 2 + * For each object format: + ** 4-byte format identifier (e.g., 'sha1' for SHA-1) + ** 4-byte length in bytes of shortened object names. This is the + shortest possible length needed to make names in the shortened + object name table unambiguous. + ** 4-byte integer, recording where tables relating to this format + are stored in this index file, as an offset from the beginning. + * 4-byte offset to the trailer from the beginning of this file. + * Zero or more additional key/value pairs (4-byte key, 4-byte + value). Only one key is supported: 'PSRC'. See the "Loose objects + and unreachable objects" section for supported values and how this + is used. All other keys are reserved. Readers must ignore + unrecognized keys. +- Zero or more NUL bytes. This can optionally be used to improve the + alignment of the full object name table below. +- Tables for the first object format: + * A sorted table of shortened object names. These are prefixes of + the names of all objects in this pack file, packed together + without offset values to reduce the cache footprint of the binary + search for a specific object name. + + * A table of full object names in pack order. This allows resolving + a reference to "the nth object in the pack file" (from a + reachability bitmap or from the next table of another object + format) to its object name. + + * A table of 4-byte values mapping object name order to pack order. + For an object in the table of sorted shortened object names, the + value at the corresponding index in this table is the index in the + previous table for that same object. + This can be used to look up the object in reachability bitmaps or + to look up its name in another object format. + + * A table of 4-byte CRC32 values of the packed object data, in the + order that the objects appear in the pack file. This is to allow + compressed data to be copied directly from pack to pack during + repacking without undetected data corruption. + + * A table of 4-byte offset values. For an object in the table of + sorted shortened object names, the value at the corresponding + index in this table indicates where that object can be found in + the pack file. These are usually 31-bit pack file offsets, but + large offsets are encoded as an index into the next table with the + most significant bit set. + + * A table of 8-byte offset entries (empty for pack files less than + 2 GiB). Pack files are organized with heavily used objects toward + the front, so most object references should not need to refer to + this table. +- Zero or more NUL bytes. +- Tables for the second object format, with the same layout as above, + up to and not including the table of CRC32 values. +- Zero or more NUL bytes. +- The trailer consists of the following: + * A copy of the 20-byte SHA-256 checksum at the end of the + corresponding packfile. + + * 20-byte SHA-256 checksum of all of the above. + +Loose object index +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +A new file $GIT_OBJECT_DIR/loose-object-idx contains information about +all loose objects. Its format is + + # loose-object-idx + (sha256-name SP sha1-name LF)* + +where the object names are in hexadecimal format. The file is not +sorted. + +The loose object index is protected against concurrent writes by a +lock file $GIT_OBJECT_DIR/loose-object-idx.lock. To add a new loose +object: + +1. Write the loose object to a temporary file, like today. +2. Open loose-object-idx.lock with O_CREAT | O_EXCL to acquire the lock. +3. Rename the loose object into place. +4. Open loose-object-idx with O_APPEND and write the new object +5. Unlink loose-object-idx.lock to release the lock. + +To remove entries (e.g. in "git pack-refs" or "git-prune"): + +1. Open loose-object-idx.lock with O_CREAT | O_EXCL to acquire the + lock. +2. Write the new content to loose-object-idx.lock. +3. Unlink any loose objects being removed. +4. Rename to replace loose-object-idx, releasing the lock. + +Translation table +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +The index files support a bidirectional mapping between SHA-1 names +and SHA-256 names. The lookup proceeds similarly to ordinary object +lookups. For example, to convert a SHA-1 name to a SHA-256 name: + + 1. Look for the object in idx files. If a match is present in the + idx's sorted list of truncated SHA-1 names, then: + a. Read the corresponding entry in the SHA-1 name order to pack + name order mapping. + b. Read the corresponding entry in the full SHA-1 name table to + verify we found the right object. If it is, then + c. Read the corresponding entry in the full SHA-256 name table. + That is the object's SHA-256 name. + 2. Check for a loose object. Read lines from loose-object-idx until + we find a match. + +Step (1) takes the same amount of time as an ordinary object lookup: +O(number of packs * log(objects per pack)). Step (2) takes O(number of +loose objects) time. To maintain good performance it will be necessary +to keep the number of loose objects low. See the "Loose objects and +unreachable objects" section below for more details. + +Since all operations that make new objects (e.g., "git commit") add +the new objects to the corresponding index, this mapping is possible +for all objects in the object store. + +Reading an object's SHA-1 content +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +The SHA-1 content of an object can be read by converting all SHA-256 names +of its SHA-256 content references to SHA-1 names using the translation table. + +Fetch +~~~~~ +Fetching from a SHA-1 based server requires translating between SHA-1 +and SHA-256 based representations on the fly. + +SHA-1s named in the ref advertisement that are present on the client +can be translated to SHA-256 and looked up as local objects using the +translation table. + +Negotiation proceeds as today. Any "have"s generated locally are +converted to SHA-1 before being sent to the server, and SHA-1s +mentioned by the server are converted to SHA-256 when looking them up +locally. + +After negotiation, the server sends a packfile containing the +requested objects. We convert the packfile to SHA-256 format using +the following steps: + +1. index-pack: inflate each object in the packfile and compute its + SHA-1. Objects can contain deltas in OBJ_REF_DELTA format against + objects the client has locally. These objects can be looked up + using the translation table and their SHA-1 content read as + described above to resolve the deltas. +2. topological sort: starting at the "want"s from the negotiation + phase, walk through objects in the pack and emit a list of them, + excluding blobs, in reverse topologically sorted order, with each + object coming later in the list than all objects it references. + (This list only contains objects reachable from the "wants". If the + pack from the server contained additional extraneous objects, then + they will be discarded.) +3. convert to SHA-256: open a new SHA-256 packfile. Read the topologically + sorted list just generated. For each object, inflate its + SHA-1 content, convert to SHA-256 content, and write it to the SHA-256 + pack. Record the new SHA-1<-->SHA-256 mapping entry for use in the idx. +4. sort: reorder entries in the new pack to match the order of objects + in the pack the server generated and include blobs. Write a SHA-256 idx + file +5. clean up: remove the SHA-1 based pack file, index, and + topologically sorted list obtained from the server in steps 1 + and 2. + +Step 3 requires every object referenced by the new object to be in the +translation table. This is why the topological sort step is necessary. + +As an optimization, step 1 could write a file describing what non-blob +objects each object it has inflated from the packfile references. This +makes the topological sort in step 2 possible without inflating the +objects in the packfile for a second time. The objects need to be +inflated again in step 3, for a total of two inflations. + +Step 4 is probably necessary for good read-time performance. "git +pack-objects" on the server optimizes the pack file for good data +locality (see Documentation/technical/pack-heuristics.txt). + +Details of this process are likely to change. It will take some +experimenting to get this to perform well. + +Push +~~~~ +Push is simpler than fetch because the objects referenced by the +pushed objects are already in the translation table. The SHA-1 content +of each object being pushed can be read as described in the "Reading +an object's SHA-1 content" section to generate the pack written by git +send-pack. + +Signed Commits +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +We add a new field "gpgsig-sha256" to the commit object format to allow +signing commits without relying on SHA-1. It is similar to the +existing "gpgsig" field. Its signed payload is the SHA-256 content of the +commit object with any "gpgsig" and "gpgsig-sha256" fields removed. + +This means commits can be signed + +1. using SHA-1 only, as in existing signed commit objects +2. using both SHA-1 and SHA-256, by using both gpgsig-sha256 and gpgsig + fields. +3. using only SHA-256, by only using the gpgsig-sha256 field. + +Old versions of "git verify-commit" can verify the gpgsig signature in +cases (1) and (2) without modifications and view case (3) as an +ordinary unsigned commit. + +Signed Tags +~~~~~~~~~~~ +We add a new field "gpgsig-sha256" to the tag object format to allow +signing tags without relying on SHA-1. Its signed payload is the +SHA-256 content of the tag with its gpgsig-sha256 field and "-----BEGIN PGP +SIGNATURE-----" delimited in-body signature removed. + +This means tags can be signed + +1. using SHA-1 only, as in existing signed tag objects +2. using both SHA-1 and SHA-256, by using gpgsig-sha256 and an in-body + signature. +3. using only SHA-256, by only using the gpgsig-sha256 field. + +Mergetag embedding +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +The mergetag field in the SHA-1 content of a commit contains the +SHA-1 content of a tag that was merged by that commit. + +The mergetag field in the SHA-256 content of the same commit contains the +SHA-256 content of the same tag. + +Submodules +~~~~~~~~~~ +To convert recorded submodule pointers, you need to have the converted +submodule repository in place. The translation table of the submodule +can be used to look up the new hash. + +Loose objects and unreachable objects +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Fast lookups in the loose-object-idx require that the number of loose +objects not grow too high. + +"git gc --auto" currently waits for there to be 6700 loose objects +present before consolidating them into a packfile. We will need to +measure to find a more appropriate threshold for it to use. + +"git gc --auto" currently waits for there to be 50 packs present +before combining packfiles. Packing loose objects more aggressively +may cause the number of pack files to grow too quickly. This can be +mitigated by using a strategy similar to Martin Fick's exponential +rolling garbage collection script: +https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/gerrit/+/35215 + +"git gc" currently expels any unreachable objects it encounters in +pack files to loose objects in an attempt to prevent a race when +pruning them (in case another process is simultaneously writing a new +object that refers to the about-to-be-deleted object). This leads to +an explosion in the number of loose objects present and disk space +usage due to the objects in delta form being replaced with independent +loose objects. Worse, the race is still present for loose objects. + +Instead, "git gc" will need to move unreachable objects to a new +packfile marked as UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE (using the PSRC field; see +below). To avoid the race when writing new objects referring to an +about-to-be-deleted object, code paths that write new objects will +need to copy any objects from UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE packs that they +refer to new, non-UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE packs (or loose objects). +UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE are then safe to delete if their creation time (as +indicated by the file's mtime) is long enough ago. + +To avoid a proliferation of UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE packs, they can be +combined under certain circumstances. If "gc.garbageTtl" is set to +greater than one day, then packs created within a single calendar day, +UTC, can be coalesced together. The resulting packfile would have an +mtime before midnight on that day, so this makes the effective maximum +ttl the garbageTtl + 1 day. If "gc.garbageTtl" is less than one day, +then we divide the calendar day into intervals one-third of that ttl +in duration. Packs created within the same interval can be coalesced +together. The resulting packfile would have an mtime before the end of +the interval, so this makes the effective maximum ttl equal to the +garbageTtl * 4/3. + +This rule comes from Thirumala Reddy Mutchukota's JGit change +https://git.eclipse.org/r/90465. + +The UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE setting goes in the PSRC field of the pack +index. More generally, that field indicates where a pack came from: + + - 1 (PACK_SOURCE_RECEIVE) for a pack received over the network + - 2 (PACK_SOURCE_AUTO) for a pack created by a lightweight + "gc --auto" operation + - 3 (PACK_SOURCE_GC) for a pack created by a full gc + - 4 (PACK_SOURCE_UNREACHABLE_GARBAGE) for potential garbage + discovered by gc + - 5 (PACK_SOURCE_INSERT) for locally created objects that were + written directly to a pack file, e.g. from "git add ." + +This information can be useful for debugging and for "gc --auto" to +make appropriate choices about which packs to coalesce. + +Caveats +------- +Invalid objects +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +The conversion from SHA-1 content to SHA-256 content retains any +brokenness in the original object (e.g., tree entry modes encoded with +leading 0, tree objects whose paths are not sorted correctly, and +commit objects without an author or committer). This is a deliberate +feature of the design to allow the conversion to round-trip. + +More profoundly broken objects (e.g., a commit with a truncated "tree" +header line) cannot be converted but were not usable by current Git +anyway. + +Shallow clone and submodules +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Because it requires all referenced objects to be available in the +locally generated translation table, this design does not support +shallow clone or unfetched submodules. Protocol improvements might +allow lifting this restriction. + +Alternates +~~~~~~~~~~ +For the same reason, a SHA-256 repository cannot borrow objects from a +SHA-1 repository using objects/info/alternates or +$GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_REPOSITORIES. + +git notes +~~~~~~~~~ +The "git notes" tool annotates objects using their SHA-1 name as key. +This design does not describe a way to migrate notes trees to use +SHA-256 names. That migration is expected to happen separately (for +example using a file at the root of the notes tree to describe which +hash it uses). + +Server-side cost +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Until Git protocol gains SHA-256 support, using SHA-256 based storage +on public-facing Git servers is strongly discouraged. Once Git +protocol gains SHA-256 support, SHA-256 based servers are likely not +to support SHA-1 compatibility, to avoid what may be a very expensive +hash re-encode during clone and to encourage peers to modernize. + +The design described here allows fetches by SHA-1 clients of a +personal SHA-256 repository because it's not much more difficult than +allowing pushes from that repository. This support needs to be guarded +by a configuration option --- servers like git.kernel.org that serve a +large number of clients would not be expected to bear that cost. + +Meaning of signatures +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +The signed payload for signed commits and tags does not explicitly +name the hash used to identify objects. If some day Git adopts a new +hash function with the same length as the current SHA-1 (40 +hexadecimal digit) or SHA-256 (64 hexadecimal digit) objects then the +intent behind the PGP signed payload in an object signature is +unclear: + + object e7e07d5a4fcc2a203d9873968ad3e6bd4d7419d7 + type commit + tag v2.12.0 + tagger Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 1487962205 -0800 + + Git 2.12 + +Does this mean Git v2.12.0 is the commit with SHA-1 name +e7e07d5a4fcc2a203d9873968ad3e6bd4d7419d7 or the commit with +new-40-digit-hash-name e7e07d5a4fcc2a203d9873968ad3e6bd4d7419d7? + +Fortunately SHA-256 and SHA-1 have different lengths. If Git starts +using another hash with the same length to name objects, then it will +need to change the format of signed payloads using that hash to +address this issue. + +Object names on the command line +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +To support the transition (see Transition plan below), this design +supports four different modes of operation: + + 1. ("dark launch") Treat object names input by the user as SHA-1 and + convert any object names written to output to SHA-1, but store + objects using SHA-256. This allows users to test the code with no + visible behavior change except for performance. This allows + running even tests that assume the SHA-1 hash function, to + sanity-check the behavior of the new mode. + + 2. ("early transition") Allow both SHA-1 and SHA-256 object names in + input. Any object names written to output use SHA-1. This allows + users to continue to make use of SHA-1 to communicate with peers + (e.g. by email) that have not migrated yet and prepares for mode 3. + + 3. ("late transition") Allow both SHA-1 and SHA-256 object names in + input. Any object names written to output use SHA-256. In this + mode, users are using a more secure object naming method by + default. The disruption is minimal as long as most of their peers + are in mode 2 or mode 3. + + 4. ("post-transition") Treat object names input by the user as + SHA-256 and write output using SHA-256. This is safer than mode 3 + because there is less risk that input is incorrectly interpreted + using the wrong hash function. + +The mode is specified in configuration. + +The user can also explicitly specify which format to use for a +particular revision specifier and for output, overriding the mode. For +example: + + git --output-format=sha1 log abac87a^{sha1}..f787cac^{sha256} + +Transition plan +--------------- +Some initial steps can be implemented independently of one another: + +- adding a hash function API (vtable) +- teaching fsck to tolerate the gpgsig-sha256 field +- excluding gpgsig-* from the fields copied by "git commit --amend" +- annotating tests that depend on SHA-1 values with a SHA1 test + prerequisite +- using "struct object_id", GIT_MAX_RAWSZ, and GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + consistently instead of "unsigned char *" and the hardcoded + constants 20 and 40. +- introducing index v3 +- adding support for the PSRC field and safer object pruning + +The first user-visible change is the introduction of the objectFormat +extension (without compatObjectFormat). This requires: + +- teaching fsck about this mode of operation +- using the hash function API (vtable) when computing object names +- signing objects and verifying signatures +- rejecting attempts to fetch from or push to an incompatible + repository + +Next comes introduction of compatObjectFormat: + +- implementing the loose-object-idx +- translating object names between object formats +- translating object content between object formats +- generating and verifying signatures in the compat format +- adding appropriate index entries when adding a new object to the + object store +- --output-format option +- ^{sha1} and ^{sha256} revision notation +- configuration to specify default input and output format (see + "Object names on the command line" above) + +The next step is supporting fetches and pushes to SHA-1 repositories: + +- allow pushes to a repository using the compat format +- generate a topologically sorted list of the SHA-1 names of fetched + objects +- convert the fetched packfile to SHA-256 format and generate an idx + file +- re-sort to match the order of objects in the fetched packfile + +The infrastructure supporting fetch also allows converting an existing +repository. In converted repositories and new clones, end users can +gain support for the new hash function without any visible change in +behavior (see "dark launch" in the "Object names on the command line" +section). In particular this allows users to verify SHA-256 signatures +on objects in the repository, and it should ensure the transition code +is stable in production in preparation for using it more widely. + +Over time projects would encourage their users to adopt the "early +transition" and then "late transition" modes to take advantage of the +new, more futureproof SHA-256 object names. + +When objectFormat and compatObjectFormat are both set, commands +generating signatures would generate both SHA-1 and SHA-256 signatures +by default to support both new and old users. + +In projects using SHA-256 heavily, users could be encouraged to adopt +the "post-transition" mode to avoid accidentally making implicit use +of SHA-1 object names. + +Once a critical mass of users have upgraded to a version of Git that +can verify SHA-256 signatures and have converted their existing +repositories to support verifying them, we can add support for a +setting to generate only SHA-256 signatures. This is expected to be at +least a year later. + +That is also a good moment to advertise the ability to convert +repositories to use SHA-256 only, stripping out all SHA-1 related +metadata. This improves performance by eliminating translation +overhead and security by avoiding the possibility of accidentally +relying on the safety of SHA-1. + +Updating Git's protocols to allow a server to specify which hash +functions it supports is also an important part of this transition. It +is not discussed in detail in this document but this transition plan +assumes it happens. :) + +Alternatives considered +----------------------- +Upgrading everyone working on a particular project on a flag day +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Projects like the Linux kernel are large and complex enough that +flipping the switch for all projects based on the repository at once +is infeasible. + +Not only would all developers and server operators supporting +developers have to switch on the same flag day, but supporting tooling +(continuous integration, code review, bug trackers, etc) would have to +be adapted as well. This also makes it difficult to get early feedback +from some project participants testing before it is time for mass +adoption. + +Using hash functions in parallel +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +(e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/git/22708.8913.864049.452252@chiark.greenend.org.uk/ ) +Objects newly created would be addressed by the new hash, but inside +such an object (e.g. commit) it is still possible to address objects +using the old hash function. + +* You cannot trust its history (needed for bisectability) in the + future without further work +* Maintenance burden as the number of supported hash functions grows + (they will never go away, so they accumulate). In this proposal, by + comparison, converted objects lose all references to SHA-1. + +Signed objects with multiple hashes +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Instead of introducing the gpgsig-sha256 field in commit and tag objects +for SHA-256 content based signatures, an earlier version of this design +added "hash sha256 <SHA-256 name>" fields to strengthen the existing +SHA-1 content based signatures. + +In other words, a single signature was used to attest to the object +content using both hash functions. This had some advantages: + +* Using one signature instead of two speeds up the signing process. +* Having one signed payload with both hashes allows the signer to + attest to the SHA-1 name and SHA-256 name referring to the same object. +* All users consume the same signature. Broken signatures are likely + to be detected quickly using current versions of git. + +However, it also came with disadvantages: + +* Verifying a signed object requires access to the SHA-1 names of all + objects it references, even after the transition is complete and + translation table is no longer needed for anything else. To support + this, the design added fields such as "hash sha1 tree <SHA-1 name>" + and "hash sha1 parent <SHA-1 name>" to the SHA-256 content of a signed + commit, complicating the conversion process. +* Allowing signed objects without a SHA-1 (for after the transition is + complete) complicated the design further, requiring a "nohash sha1" + field to suppress including "hash sha1" fields in the SHA-256 content + and signed payload. + +Lazily populated translation table +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Some of the work of building the translation table could be deferred to +push time, but that would significantly complicate and slow down pushes. +Calculating the SHA-1 name at object creation time at the same time it is +being streamed to disk and having its SHA-256 name calculated should be +an acceptable cost. + +Document History +---------------- + +2017-03-03 +bmwill@google.com, jonathantanmy@google.com, jrnieder@gmail.com, +sbeller@google.com + +* Initial version sent to https://lore.kernel.org/git/20170304011251.GA26789@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com + +2017-03-03 jrnieder@gmail.com +Incorporated suggestions from jonathantanmy and sbeller: + +* Describe purpose of signed objects with each hash type +* Redefine signed object verification using object content under the + first hash function + +2017-03-06 jrnieder@gmail.com + +* Use SHA3-256 instead of SHA2 (thanks, Linus and brian m. carlson).[1][2] +* Make SHA3-based signatures a separate field, avoiding the need for + "hash" and "nohash" fields (thanks to peff[3]). +* Add a sorting phase to fetch (thanks to Junio for noticing the need + for this). +* Omit blobs from the topological sort during fetch (thanks to peff). +* Discuss alternates, git notes, and git servers in the caveats + section (thanks to Junio Hamano, brian m. carlson[4], and Shawn + Pearce). +* Clarify language throughout (thanks to various commenters, + especially Junio). + +2017-09-27 jrnieder@gmail.com, sbeller@google.com + +* Use placeholder NewHash instead of SHA3-256 +* Describe criteria for picking a hash function. +* Include a transition plan (thanks especially to Brandon Williams + for fleshing these ideas out) +* Define the translation table (thanks, Shawn Pearce[5], Jonathan + Tan, and Masaya Suzuki) +* Avoid loose object overhead by packing more aggressively in + "git gc --auto" + +Later history: + +* See the history of this file in git.git for the history of subsequent + edits. This document history is no longer being maintained as it + would now be superfluous to the commit log + +References: + + [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CA+55aFzJtejiCjV0e43+9oR3QuJK2PiFiLQemytoLpyJWe6P9w@mail.gmail.com/ + [2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CA+55aFz+gkAsDZ24zmePQuEs1XPS9BP_s8O7Q4wQ7LV7X5-oDA@mail.gmail.com/ + [3] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20170306084353.nrns455dvkdsfgo5@sigill.intra.peff.net/ + [4] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20170304224936.rqqtkdvfjgyezsht@genre.crustytoothpaste.net + [5] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAJo=hJtoX9=AyLHHpUJS7fueV9ciZ_MNpnEPHUz8Whui6g9F0A@mail.gmail.com/ diff --git a/Documentation/technical/long-running-process-protocol.txt b/Documentation/technical/long-running-process-protocol.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6f33654 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/long-running-process-protocol.txt @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +Long-running process protocol +============================= + +This protocol is used when Git needs to communicate with an external +process throughout the entire life of a single Git command. All +communication is in pkt-line format (see linkgit:gitprotocol-common[5]) +over standard input and standard output. + +Handshake +--------- + +Git starts by sending a welcome message (for example, +"git-filter-client"), a list of supported protocol version numbers, and +a flush packet. Git expects to read the welcome message with "server" +instead of "client" (for example, "git-filter-server"), exactly one +protocol version number from the previously sent list, and a flush +packet. All further communication will be based on the selected version. +The remaining protocol description below documents "version=2". Please +note that "version=42" in the example below does not exist and is only +there to illustrate how the protocol would look like with more than one +version. + +After the version negotiation Git sends a list of all capabilities that +it supports and a flush packet. Git expects to read a list of desired +capabilities, which must be a subset of the supported capabilities list, +and a flush packet as response: +------------------------ +packet: git> git-filter-client +packet: git> version=2 +packet: git> version=42 +packet: git> 0000 +packet: git< git-filter-server +packet: git< version=2 +packet: git< 0000 +packet: git> capability=clean +packet: git> capability=smudge +packet: git> capability=not-yet-invented +packet: git> 0000 +packet: git< capability=clean +packet: git< capability=smudge +packet: git< 0000 +------------------------ + +Shutdown +-------- + +Git will close +the command pipe on exit. The filter is expected to detect EOF +and exit gracefully on its own. Git will wait until the filter +process has stopped. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/multi-pack-index.txt b/Documentation/technical/multi-pack-index.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f2221d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/multi-pack-index.txt @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +Multi-Pack-Index (MIDX) Design Notes +==================================== + +The Git object directory contains a 'pack' directory containing +packfiles (with suffix ".pack") and pack-indexes (with suffix +".idx"). The pack-indexes provide a way to lookup objects and +navigate to their offset within the pack, but these must come +in pairs with the packfiles. This pairing depends on the file +names, as the pack-index differs only in suffix with its pack- +file. While the pack-indexes provide fast lookup per packfile, +this performance degrades as the number of packfiles increases, +because abbreviations need to inspect every packfile and we are +more likely to have a miss on our most-recently-used packfile. +For some large repositories, repacking into a single packfile +is not feasible due to storage space or excessive repack times. + +The multi-pack-index (MIDX for short) stores a list of objects +and their offsets into multiple packfiles. It contains: + +* A list of packfile names. +* A sorted list of object IDs. +* A list of metadata for the ith object ID including: +** A value j referring to the jth packfile. +** An offset within the jth packfile for the object. +* If large offsets are required, we use another list of large + offsets similar to version 2 pack-indexes. +- An optional list of objects in pseudo-pack order (used with MIDX bitmaps). + +Thus, we can provide O(log N) lookup time for any number +of packfiles. + +Design Details +-------------- + +- The MIDX is stored in a file named 'multi-pack-index' in the + .git/objects/pack directory. This could be stored in the pack + directory of an alternate. It refers only to packfiles in that + same directory. + +- The core.multiPackIndex config setting must be on (which is the + default) to consume MIDX files. Setting it to `false` prevents + Git from reading a MIDX file, even if one exists. + +- The file format includes parameters for the object ID hash + function, so a future change of hash algorithm does not require + a change in format. + +- The MIDX keeps only one record per object ID. If an object appears + in multiple packfiles, then the MIDX selects the copy in the + preferred packfile, otherwise selecting from the most-recently + modified packfile. + +- If there exist packfiles in the pack directory not registered in + the MIDX, then those packfiles are loaded into the `packed_git` + list and `packed_git_mru` cache. + +- The pack-indexes (.idx files) remain in the pack directory so we + can delete the MIDX file, set core.midx to false, or downgrade + without any loss of information. + +- The MIDX file format uses a chunk-based approach (similar to the + commit-graph file) that allows optional data to be added. + +Future Work +----------- + +- The multi-pack-index allows many packfiles, especially in a context + where repacking is expensive (such as a very large repo), or + unexpected maintenance time is unacceptable (such as a high-demand + build machine). However, the multi-pack-index needs to be rewritten + in full every time. We can extend the format to be incremental, so + writes are fast. By storing a small "tip" multi-pack-index that + points to large "base" MIDX files, we can keep writes fast while + still reducing the number of binary searches required for object + lookups. + +- If the multi-pack-index is extended to store a "stable object order" + (a function Order(hash) = integer that is constant for a given hash, + even as the multi-pack-index is updated) then MIDX bitmaps could be + updated independently of the MIDX. + +- Packfiles can be marked as "special" using empty files that share + the initial name but replace ".pack" with ".keep" or ".promisor". + We can add an optional chunk of data to the multi-pack-index that + records flags of information about the packfiles. This allows new + states, such as 'repacked' or 'redeltified', that can help with + pack maintenance in a multi-pack environment. It may also be + helpful to organize packfiles by object type (commit, tree, blob, + etc.) and use this metadata to help that maintenance. + +Related Links +------------- +[0] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/git/issues/detail?id=6 + Chromium work item for: Multi-Pack Index (MIDX) + +[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180107181459.222909-1-dstolee@microsoft.com/ + An earlier RFC for the multi-pack-index feature + +[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/alpine.DEB.2.20.1803091557510.23109@alexmv-linux/ + Git Merge 2018 Contributor's summit notes (includes discussion of MIDX) diff --git a/Documentation/technical/pack-heuristics.txt b/Documentation/technical/pack-heuristics.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..95a07db --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/pack-heuristics.txt @@ -0,0 +1,460 @@ +Concerning Git's Packing Heuristics +=================================== + + Oh, here's a really stupid question: + + Where do I go + to learn the details + of Git's packing heuristics? + +Be careful what you ask! + +Followers of the Git, please open the Git IRC Log and turn to +February 10, 2006. + +It's a rare occasion, and we are joined by the King Git Himself, +Linus Torvalds (linus). Nathaniel Smith, (njs`), has the floor +and seeks enlightenment. Others are present, but silent. + +Let's listen in! + + <njs`> Oh, here's a really stupid question -- where do I go to + learn the details of Git's packing heuristics? google avails + me not, reading the source didn't help a lot, and wading + through the whole mailing list seems less efficient than any + of that. + +It is a bold start! A plea for help combined with a simultaneous +tri-part attack on some of the tried and true mainstays in the quest +for enlightenment. Brash accusations of google being useless. Hubris! +Maligning the source. Heresy! Disdain for the mailing list archives. +Woe. + + <pasky> yes, the packing-related delta stuff is somewhat + mysterious even for me ;) + +Ah! Modesty after all. + + <linus> njs, I don't think the docs exist. That's something where + I don't think anybody else than me even really got involved. + Most of the rest of Git others have been busy with (especially + Junio), but packing nobody touched after I did it. + +It's cryptic, yet vague. Linus in style for sure. Wise men +interpret this as an apology. A few argue it is merely a +statement of fact. + + <njs`> I guess the next step is "read the source again", but I + have to build up a certain level of gumption first :-) + +Indeed! On both points. + + <linus> The packing heuristic is actually really really simple. + +Bait... + + <linus> But strange. + +And switch. That ought to do it! + + <linus> Remember: Git really doesn't follow files. So what it does is + - generate a list of all objects + - sort the list according to magic heuristics + - walk the list, using a sliding window, seeing if an object + can be diffed against another object in the window + - write out the list in recency order + +The traditional understatement: + + <njs`> I suspect that what I'm missing is the precise definition of + the word "magic" + +The traditional insight: + + <pasky> yes + +And Babel-like confusion flowed. + + <njs`> oh, hmm, and I'm not sure what this sliding window means either + + <pasky> iirc, it appeared to me to be just the sha1 of the object + when reading the code casually ... + + ... which simply doesn't sound as a very good heuristics, though ;) + + <njs`> .....and recency order. okay, I think it's clear I didn't + even realize how much I wasn't realizing :-) + +Ah, grasshopper! And thus the enlightenment begins anew. + + <linus> The "magic" is actually in theory totally arbitrary. + ANY order will give you a working pack, but no, it's not + ordered by SHA-1. + + Before talking about the ordering for the sliding delta + window, let's talk about the recency order. That's more + important in one way. + + <njs`> Right, but if all you want is a working way to pack things + together, you could just use cat and save yourself some + trouble... + +Waaait for it.... + + <linus> The recency ordering (which is basically: put objects + _physically_ into the pack in the order that they are + "reachable" from the head) is important. + + <njs`> okay + + <linus> It's important because that's the thing that gives packs + good locality. It keeps the objects close to the head (whether + they are old or new, but they are _reachable_ from the head) + at the head of the pack. So packs actually have absolutely + _wonderful_ IO patterns. + +Read that again, because it is important. + + <linus> But recency ordering is totally useless for deciding how + to actually generate the deltas, so the delta ordering is + something else. + + The delta ordering is (wait for it): + - first sort by the "basename" of the object, as defined by + the name the object was _first_ reached through when + generating the object list + - within the same basename, sort by size of the object + - but always sort different types separately (commits first). + + That's not exactly it, but it's very close. + + <njs`> The "_first_ reached" thing is not too important, just you + need some way to break ties since the same objects may be + reachable many ways, yes? + +And as if to clarify: + + <linus> The point is that it's all really just any random + heuristic, and the ordering is totally unimportant for + correctness, but it helps a lot if the heuristic gives + "clumping" for things that are likely to delta well against + each other. + +It is an important point, so secretly, I did my own research and have +included my results below. To be fair, it has changed some over time. +And through the magic of Revisionistic History, I draw upon this entry +from The Git IRC Logs on my father's birthday, March 1: + + <gitster> The quote from the above linus should be rewritten a + bit (wait for it): + - first sort by type. Different objects never delta with + each other. + - then sort by filename/dirname. hash of the basename + occupies the top BITS_PER_INT-DIR_BITS bits, and bottom + DIR_BITS are for the hash of leading path elements. + - then if we are doing "thin" pack, the objects we are _not_ + going to pack but we know about are sorted earlier than + other objects. + - and finally sort by size, larger to smaller. + +In one swell-foop, clarification and obscurification! Nonetheless, +authoritative. Cryptic, yet concise. It even solicits notions of +quotes from The Source Code. Clearly, more study is needed. + + <gitster> That's the sort order. What this means is: + - we do not delta different object types. + - we prefer to delta the objects with the same full path, but + allow files with the same name from different directories. + - we always prefer to delta against objects we are not going + to send, if there are some. + - we prefer to delta against larger objects, so that we have + lots of removals. + + The penultimate rule is for "thin" packs. It is used when + the other side is known to have such objects. + +There it is again. "Thin" packs. I'm thinking to myself, "What +is a 'thin' pack?" So I ask: + + <jdl> What is a "thin" pack? + + <gitster> Use of --objects-edge to rev-list as the upstream of + pack-objects. The pack transfer protocol negotiates that. + +Woo hoo! Cleared that _right_ up! + + <gitster> There are two directions - push and fetch. + +There! Did you see it? It is not '"push" and "pull"'! How often the +confusion has started here. So casually mentioned, too! + + <gitster> For push, git-send-pack invokes git-receive-pack on the + other end. The receive-pack says "I have up to these commits". + send-pack looks at them, and computes what are missing from + the other end. So "thin" could be the default there. + + In the other direction, fetch, git-fetch-pack and + git-clone-pack invokes git-upload-pack on the other end + (via ssh or by talking to the daemon). + + There are two cases: fetch-pack with -k and clone-pack is one, + fetch-pack without -k is the other. clone-pack and fetch-pack + with -k will keep the downloaded packfile without expanded, so + we do not use thin pack transfer. Otherwise, the generated + pack will have delta without base object in the same pack. + + But fetch-pack without -k will explode the received pack into + individual objects, so we automatically ask upload-pack to + give us a thin pack if upload-pack supports it. + +OK then. + +Uh. + +Let's return to the previous conversation still in progress. + + <njs`> and "basename" means something like "the tail of end of + path of file objects and dir objects, as per basename(3), and + we just declare all commit and tag objects to have the same + basename" or something? + +Luckily, that too is a point that gitster clarified for us! + +If I might add, the trick is to make files that _might_ be similar be +located close to each other in the hash buckets based on their file +names. It used to be that "foo/Makefile", "bar/baz/quux/Makefile" and +"Makefile" all landed in the same bucket due to their common basename, +"Makefile". However, now they land in "close" buckets. + +The algorithm allows not just for the _same_ bucket, but for _close_ +buckets to be considered delta candidates. The rationale is +essentially that files, like Makefiles, often have very similar +content no matter what directory they live in. + + <linus> I played around with different delta algorithms, and with + making the "delta window" bigger, but having too big of a + sliding window makes it very expensive to generate the pack: + you need to compare every object with a _ton_ of other objects. + + There are a number of other trivial heuristics too, which + basically boil down to "don't bother even trying to delta this + pair" if we can tell before-hand that the delta isn't worth it + (due to size differences, where we can take a previous delta + result into account to decide that "ok, no point in trying + that one, it will be worse"). + + End result: packing is actually very size efficient. It's + somewhat CPU-wasteful, but on the other hand, since you're + really only supposed to do it maybe once a month (and you can + do it during the night), nobody really seems to care. + +Nice Engineering Touch, there. Find when it doesn't matter, and +proclaim it a non-issue. Good style too! + + <njs`> So, just to repeat to see if I'm following, we start by + getting a list of the objects we want to pack, we sort it by + this heuristic (basically lexicographically on the tuple + (type, basename, size)). + + Then we walk through this list, and calculate a delta of + each object against the last n (tunable parameter) objects, + and pick the smallest of these deltas. + +Vastly simplified, but the essence is there! + + <linus> Correct. + + <njs`> And then once we have picked a delta or fulltext to + represent each object, we re-sort by recency, and write them + out in that order. + + <linus> Yup. Some other small details: + +And of course there is the "Other Shoe" Factor too. + + <linus> - We limit the delta depth to another magic value (right + now both the window and delta depth magic values are just "10") + + <njs`> Hrm, my intuition is that you'd end up with really _bad_ IO + patterns, because the things you want are near by, but to + actually reconstruct them you may have to jump all over in + random ways. + + <linus> - When we write out a delta, and we haven't yet written + out the object it is a delta against, we write out the base + object first. And no, when we reconstruct them, we actually + get nice IO patterns, because: + - larger objects tend to be "more recent" (Linus' law: files grow) + - we actively try to generate deltas from a larger object to a + smaller one + - this means that the top-of-tree very seldom has deltas + (i.e. deltas in _practice_ are "backwards deltas") + +Again, we should reread that whole paragraph. Not just because +Linus has slipped Linus's Law in there on us, but because it is +important. Let's make sure we clarify some of the points here: + + <njs`> So the point is just that in practice, delta order and + recency order match each other quite well. + + <linus> Yes. There's another nice side to this (and yes, it was + designed that way ;): + - the reason we generate deltas against the larger object is + actually a big space saver too! + + <njs`> Hmm, but your last comment (if "we haven't yet written out + the object it is a delta against, we write out the base object + first"), seems like it would make these facts mostly + irrelevant because even if in practice you would not have to + wander around much, in fact you just brute-force say that in + the cases where you might have to wander, don't do that :-) + + <linus> Yes and no. Notice the rule: we only write out the base + object first if the delta against it was more recent. That + means that you can actually have deltas that refer to a base + object that is _not_ close to the delta object, but that only + happens when the delta is needed to generate an _old_ object. + + <linus> See? + +Yeah, no. I missed that on the first two or three readings myself. + + <linus> This keeps the front of the pack dense. The front of the + pack never contains data that isn't relevant to a "recent" + object. The size optimization comes from our use of xdelta + (but is true for many other delta algorithms): removing data + is cheaper (in size) than adding data. + + When you remove data, you only need to say "copy bytes n--m". + In contrast, in a delta that _adds_ data, you have to say "add + these bytes: 'actual data goes here'" + + *** njs` has quit: Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer) + + <linus> Uhhuh. I hope I didn't blow njs` mind. + + *** njs` has joined channel #git + + <pasky> :) + +The silent observers are amused. Of course. + +And as if njs` was expected to be omniscient: + + <linus> njs - did you miss anything? + +OK, I'll spell it out. That's Geek Humor. If njs` was not actually +connected for a little bit there, how would he know if missed anything +while he was disconnected? He's a benevolent dictator with a sense of +humor! Well noted! + + <njs`> Stupid router. Or gremlins, or whatever. + +It's a cheap shot at Cisco. Take 'em when you can. + + <njs`> Yes and no. Notice the rule: we only write out the base + object first if the delta against it was more recent. + + I'm getting lost in all these orders, let me re-read :-) + So the write-out order is from most recent to least recent? + (Conceivably it could be the opposite way too, I'm not sure if + we've said) though my connection back at home is logging, so I + can just read what you said there :-) + +And for those of you paying attention, the Omniscient Trick has just +been detailed! + + <linus> Yes, we always write out most recent first + + <njs`> And, yeah, I got the part about deeper-in-history stuff + having worse IO characteristics, one sort of doesn't care. + + <linus> With the caveat that if the "most recent" needs an older + object to delta against (hey, shrinking sometimes does + happen), we write out the old object with the delta. + + <njs`> (if only it happened more...) + + <linus> Anyway, the pack-file could easily be denser still, but + because it's used both for streaming (the Git protocol) and + for on-disk, it has a few pessimizations. + +Actually, it is a made-up word. But it is a made-up word being +used as setup for a later optimization, which is a real word: + + <linus> In particular, while the pack-file is then compressed, + it's compressed just one object at a time, so the actual + compression factor is less than it could be in theory. But it + means that it's all nice random-access with a simple index to + do "object name->location in packfile" translation. + + <njs`> I'm assuming the real win for delta-ing large->small is + more homogeneous statistics for gzip to run over? + + (You have to put the bytes in one place or another, but + putting them in a larger blob wins on compression) + + Actually, what is the compression strategy -- each delta + individually gzipped, the whole file gzipped, somewhere in + between, no compression at all, ....? + + Right. + +Reality IRC sets in. For example: + + <pasky> I'll read the rest in the morning, I really have to go + sleep or there's no hope whatsoever for me at the today's + exam... g'nite all. + +Heh. + + <linus> pasky: g'nite + + <njs`> pasky: 'luck + + <linus> Right: large->small matters exactly because of compression + behaviour. If it was non-compressed, it probably wouldn't make + any difference. + + <njs`> yeah + + <linus> Anyway: I'm not even trying to claim that the pack-files + are perfect, but they do tend to have a nice balance of + density vs ease-of use. + +Gasp! OK, saved. That's a fair Engineering trade off. Close call! +In fact, Linus reflects on some Basic Engineering Fundamentals, +design options, etc. + + <linus> More importantly, they allow Git to still _conceptually_ + never deal with deltas at all, and be a "whole object" store. + + Which has some problems (we discussed bad huge-file + behaviour on the Git lists the other day), but it does mean + that the basic Git concepts are really really simple and + straightforward. + + It's all been quite stable. + + Which I think is very much a result of having very simple + basic ideas, so that there's never any confusion about what's + going on. + + Bugs happen, but they are "simple" bugs. And bugs that + actually get some object store detail wrong are almost always + so obvious that they never go anywhere. + + <njs`> Yeah. + +Nuff said. + + <linus> Anyway. I'm off for bed. It's not 6AM here, but I've got + three kids, and have to get up early in the morning to send + them off. I need my beauty sleep. + + <njs`> :-) + + <njs`> appreciate the infodump, I really was failing to find the + details on Git packs :-) + +And now you know the rest of the story. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/packfile-uri.txt b/Documentation/technical/packfile-uri.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9d453d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/packfile-uri.txt @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +Packfile URIs +============= + +This feature allows servers to serve part of their packfile response as URIs. +This allows server designs that improve scalability in bandwidth and CPU usage +(for example, by serving some data through a CDN), and (in the future) provides +some measure of resumability to clients. + +This feature is available only in protocol version 2. + +Protocol +-------- + +The server advertises the `packfile-uris` capability. + +If the client then communicates which protocols (HTTPS, etc.) it supports with +a `packfile-uris` argument, the server MAY send a `packfile-uris` section +directly before the `packfile` section (right after `wanted-refs` if it is +sent) containing URIs of any of the given protocols. The URIs point to +packfiles that use only features that the client has declared that it supports +(e.g. ofs-delta and thin-pack). See linkgit:gitprotocol-v2[5] for the documentation of +this section. + +Clients should then download and index all the given URIs (in addition to +downloading and indexing the packfile given in the `packfile` section of the +response) before performing the connectivity check. + +Server design +------------- + +The server can be trivially made compatible with the proposed protocol by +having it advertise `packfile-uris`, tolerating the client sending +`packfile-uris`, and never sending any `packfile-uris` section. But we should +include some sort of non-trivial implementation in the Minimum Viable Product, +at least so that we can test the client. + +This is the implementation: a feature, marked experimental, that allows the +server to be configured by one or more `uploadpack.blobPackfileUri= +<object-hash> <pack-hash> <uri>` entries. Whenever the list of objects to be +sent is assembled, all such blobs are excluded, replaced with URIs. As noted +in "Future work" below, the server can evolve in the future to support +excluding other objects (or other implementations of servers could be made +that support excluding other objects) without needing a protocol change, so +clients should not expect that packfiles downloaded in this way only contain +single blobs. + +Client design +------------- + +The client has a config variable `fetch.uriprotocols` that determines which +protocols the end user is willing to use. By default, this is empty. + +When the client downloads the given URIs, it should store them with "keep" +files, just like it does with the packfile in the `packfile` section. These +additional "keep" files can only be removed after the refs have been updated - +just like the "keep" file for the packfile in the `packfile` section. + +The division of work (initial fetch + additional URIs) introduces convenient +points for resumption of an interrupted clone - such resumption can be done +after the Minimum Viable Product (see "Future work"). + +Future work +----------- + +The protocol design allows some evolution of the server and client without any +need for protocol changes, so only a small-scoped design is included here to +form the MVP. For example, the following can be done: + + * On the server, more sophisticated means of excluding objects (e.g. by + specifying a commit to represent that commit and all objects that it + references). + * On the client, resumption of clone. If a clone is interrupted, information + could be recorded in the repository's config and a "clone-resume" command + can resume the clone in progress. (Resumption of subsequent fetches is more + difficult because that must deal with the user wanting to use the repository + even after the fetch was interrupted.) + +There are some possible features that will require a change in protocol: + + * Additional HTTP headers (e.g. authentication) + * Byte range support + * Different file formats referenced by URIs (e.g. raw object) diff --git a/Documentation/technical/parallel-checkout.txt b/Documentation/technical/parallel-checkout.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..47c9b61 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/parallel-checkout.txt @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ +Parallel Checkout Design Notes +============================== + +The "Parallel Checkout" feature attempts to use multiple processes to +parallelize the work of uncompressing the blobs, applying in-core +filters, and writing the resulting contents to the working tree during a +checkout operation. It can be used by all checkout-related commands, +such as `clone`, `checkout`, `reset`, `sparse-checkout`, and others. + +These commands share the following basic structure: + +* Step 1: Read the current index file into memory. + +* Step 2: Modify the in-memory index based upon the command, and + temporarily mark all cache entries that need to be updated. + +* Step 3: Populate the working tree to match the new candidate index. + This includes iterating over all of the to-be-updated cache entries + and delete, create, or overwrite the associated files in the working + tree. + +* Step 4: Write the new index to disk. + +Step 3 is the focus of the "parallel checkout" effort described here. + +Sequential Implementation +------------------------- + +For the purposes of discussion here, the current sequential +implementation of Step 3 is divided in 3 parts, each one implemented in +its own function: + +* Step 3a: `unpack-trees.c:check_updates()` contains a series of + sequential loops iterating over the `cache_entry`'s array. The main + loop in this function calls the Step 3b function for each of the + to-be-updated entries. + +* Step 3b: `entry.c:checkout_entry()` examines the existing working tree + for file conflicts, collisions, and unsaved changes. It removes files + and creates leading directories as necessary. It calls the Step 3c + function for each entry to be written. + +* Step 3c: `entry.c:write_entry()` loads the blob into memory, smudges + it if necessary, creates the file in the working tree, writes the + smudged contents, calls `fstat()` or `lstat()`, and updates the + associated `cache_entry` struct with the stat information gathered. + +It wouldn't be safe to perform Step 3b in parallel, as there could be +race conditions between file creations and removals. Instead, the +parallel checkout framework lets the sequential code handle Step 3b, +and uses parallel workers to replace the sequential +`entry.c:write_entry()` calls from Step 3c. + +Rejected Multi-Threaded Solution +-------------------------------- + +The most "straightforward" implementation would be to spread the set of +to-be-updated cache entries across multiple threads. But due to the +thread-unsafe functions in the object database code, we would have to use locks to +coordinate the parallel operation. An early prototype of this solution +showed that the multi-threaded checkout would bring performance +improvements over the sequential code, but there was still too much lock +contention. A `perf` profiling indicated that around 20% of the runtime +during a local Linux clone (on an SSD) was spent in locking functions. +For this reason this approach was rejected in favor of using multiple +child processes, which led to a better performance. + +Multi-Process Solution +---------------------- + +Parallel checkout alters the aforementioned Step 3 to use multiple +`checkout--worker` background processes to distribute the work. The +long-running worker processes are controlled by the foreground Git +command using the existing run-command API. + +Overview +~~~~~~~~ + +Step 3b is only slightly altered; for each entry to be checked out, the +main process performs the following steps: + +* M1: Check whether there is any untracked or unclean file in the + working tree which would be overwritten by this entry, and decide + whether to proceed (removing the file(s)) or not. + +* M2: Create the leading directories. + +* M3: Load the conversion attributes for the entry's path. + +* M4: Check, based on the entry's type and conversion attributes, + whether the entry is eligible for parallel checkout (more on this + later). If it is eligible, enqueue the entry and the loaded + attributes to later write the entry in parallel. If not, write the + entry right away, using the default sequential code. + +Note: we save the conversion attributes associated with each entry +because the workers don't have access to the main process' index state, +so they can't load the attributes by themselves (and the attributes are +needed to properly smudge the entry). Additionally, this has a positive +impact on performance as (1) we don't need to load the attributes twice +and (2) the attributes machinery is optimized to handle paths in +sequential order. + +After all entries have passed through the above steps, the main process +checks if the number of enqueued entries is sufficient to spread among +the workers. If not, it just writes them sequentially. Otherwise, it +spawns the workers and distributes the queued entries uniformly in +continuous chunks. This aims to minimize the chances of two workers +writing to the same directory simultaneously, which could increase lock +contention in the kernel. + +Then, for each assigned item, each worker: + +* W1: Checks if there is any non-directory file in the leading part of + the entry's path or if there already exists a file at the entry' path. + If so, mark the entry with `PC_ITEM_COLLIDED` and skip it (more on + this later). + +* W2: Creates the file (with O_CREAT and O_EXCL). + +* W3: Loads the blob into memory (inflating and delta reconstructing + it). + +* W4: Applies any required in-process filter, like end-of-line + conversion and re-encoding. + +* W5: Writes the result to the file descriptor opened at W2. + +* W6: Calls `fstat()` or lstat()` on the just-written path, and sends + the result back to the main process, together with the end status of + the operation and the item's identification number. + +Note that, when possible, steps W3 to W5 are delegated to the streaming +machinery, removing the need to keep the entire blob in memory. + +If the worker fails to read the blob or to write it to the working tree, +it removes the created file to avoid leaving empty files behind. This is +the *only* time a worker is allowed to remove a file. + +As mentioned earlier, it is the responsibility of the main process to +remove any file that blocks the checkout operation (or abort if the +removal(s) would cause data loss and the user didn't ask to `--force`). +This is crucial to avoid race conditions and also to properly detect +path collisions at Step W1. + +After the workers finish writing the items and sending back the required +information, the main process handles the results in two steps: + +- First, it updates the in-memory index with the `lstat()` information + sent by the workers. (This must be done first as this information + might me required in the following step.) + +- Then it writes the items which collided on disk (i.e. items marked + with `PC_ITEM_COLLIDED`). More on this below. + +Path Collisions +--------------- + +Path collisions happen when two different paths correspond to the same +entry in the file system. E.g. the paths 'a' and 'A' would collide in a +case-insensitive file system. + +The sequential checkout deals with collisions in the same way that it +deals with files that were already present in the working tree before +checkout. Basically, it checks if the path that it wants to write +already exists on disk, makes sure the existing file doesn't have +unsaved data, and then overwrites it. (To be more pedantic: it deletes +the existing file and creates the new one.) So, if there are multiple +colliding files to be checked out, the sequential code will write each +one of them but only the last will actually survive on disk. + +Parallel checkout aims to reproduce the same behavior. However, we +cannot let the workers racily write to the same file on disk. Instead, +the workers detect when the entry that they want to check out would +collide with an existing file, and mark it with `PC_ITEM_COLLIDED`. +Later, the main process can sequentially feed these entries back to +`checkout_entry()` without the risk of race conditions. On clone, this +also has the effect of marking the colliding entries to later emit a +warning for the user, like the classic sequential checkout does. + +The workers are able to detect both collisions among the entries being +concurrently written and collisions between a parallel-eligible entry +and an ineligible entry. The general idea for collision detection is +quite straightforward: for each parallel-eligible entry, the main +process must remove all files that prevent this entry from being written +(before enqueueing it). This includes any non-directory file in the +leading path of the entry. Later, when a worker gets assigned the entry, +it looks again for the non-directories files and for an already existing +file at the entry's path. If any of these checks finds something, the +worker knows that there was a path collision. + +Because parallel checkout can distinguish path collisions from the case +where the file was already present in the working tree before checkout, +we could alternatively choose to skip the checkout of colliding entries. +However, each entry that doesn't get written would have NULL `lstat()` +fields on the index. This could cause performance penalties for +subsequent commands that need to refresh the index, as they would have +to go to the file system to see if the entry is dirty. Thus, if we have +N entries in a colliding group and we decide to write and `lstat()` only +one of them, every subsequent `git-status` will have to read, convert, +and hash the written file N - 1 times. By checking out all colliding +entries (like the sequential code does), we only pay the overhead once, +during checkout. + +Eligible Entries for Parallel Checkout +-------------------------------------- + +As previously mentioned, not all entries passed to `checkout_entry()` +will be considered eligible for parallel checkout. More specifically, we +exclude: + +- Symbolic links; to avoid race conditions that, in combination with + path collisions, could cause workers to write files at the wrong + place. For example, if we were to concurrently check out a symlink + 'a' -> 'b' and a regular file 'A/f' in a case-insensitive file system, + we could potentially end up writing the file 'A/f' at 'a/f', due to a + race condition. + +- Regular files that require external filters (either "one shot" filters + or long-running process filters). These filters are black-boxes to Git + and may have their own internal locking or non-concurrent assumptions. + So it might not be safe to run multiple instances in parallel. ++ +Besides, long-running filters may use the delayed checkout feature to +postpone the return of some filtered blobs. The delayed checkout queue +and the parallel checkout queue are not compatible and should remain +separate. ++ +Note: regular files that only require internal filters, like end-of-line +conversion and re-encoding, are eligible for parallel checkout. + +Ineligible entries are checked out by the classic sequential codepath +*before* spawning workers. + +Note: submodules's files are also eligible for parallel checkout (as +long as they don't fall into any of the excluding categories mentioned +above). But since each submodule is checked out in its own child +process, we don't mix the superproject's and the submodules' files in +the same parallel checkout process or queue. + +The API +------- + +The parallel checkout API was designed with the goal of minimizing +changes to the current users of the checkout machinery. This means that +they don't have to call a different function for sequential or parallel +checkout. As already mentioned, `checkout_entry()` will automatically +insert the given entry in the parallel checkout queue when this feature +is enabled and the entry is eligible; otherwise, it will just write the +entry right away, using the sequential code. In general, callers of the +parallel checkout API should look similar to this: + +---------------------------------------------- +int pc_workers, pc_threshold, err = 0; +struct checkout state; + +get_parallel_checkout_configs(&pc_workers, &pc_threshold); + +/* + * This check is not strictly required, but it + * should save some time in sequential mode. + */ +if (pc_workers > 1) + init_parallel_checkout(); + +for (each cache_entry ce to-be-updated) + err |= checkout_entry(ce, &state, NULL, NULL); + +err |= run_parallel_checkout(&state, pc_workers, pc_threshold, NULL, NULL); +---------------------------------------------- diff --git a/Documentation/technical/partial-clone.txt b/Documentation/technical/partial-clone.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..92fcee2 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/partial-clone.txt @@ -0,0 +1,367 @@ +Partial Clone Design Notes +========================== + +The "Partial Clone" feature is a performance optimization for Git that +allows Git to function without having a complete copy of the repository. +The goal of this work is to allow Git better handle extremely large +repositories. + +During clone and fetch operations, Git downloads the complete contents +and history of the repository. This includes all commits, trees, and +blobs for the complete life of the repository. For extremely large +repositories, clones can take hours (or days) and consume 100+GiB of disk +space. + +Often in these repositories there are many blobs and trees that the user +does not need such as: + + 1. files outside of the user's work area in the tree. For example, in + a repository with 500K directories and 3.5M files in every commit, + we can avoid downloading many objects if the user only needs a + narrow "cone" of the source tree. + + 2. large binary assets. For example, in a repository where large build + artifacts are checked into the tree, we can avoid downloading all + previous versions of these non-mergeable binary assets and only + download versions that are actually referenced. + +Partial clone allows us to avoid downloading such unneeded objects *in +advance* during clone and fetch operations and thereby reduce download +times and disk usage. Missing objects can later be "demand fetched" +if/when needed. + +A remote that can later provide the missing objects is called a +promisor remote, as it promises to send the objects when +requested. Initially Git supported only one promisor remote, the origin +remote from which the user cloned and that was configured in the +"extensions.partialClone" config option. Later support for more than +one promisor remote has been implemented. + +Use of partial clone requires that the user be online and the origin +remote or other promisor remotes be available for on-demand fetching +of missing objects. This may or may not be problematic for the user. +For example, if the user can stay within the pre-selected subset of +the source tree, they may not encounter any missing objects. +Alternatively, the user could try to pre-fetch various objects if they +know that they are going offline. + + +Non-Goals +--------- + +Partial clone is a mechanism to limit the number of blobs and trees downloaded +*within* a given range of commits -- and is therefore independent of and not +intended to conflict with existing DAG-level mechanisms to limit the set of +requested commits (i.e. shallow clone, single branch, or fetch '<refspec>'). + + +Design Overview +--------------- + +Partial clone logically consists of the following parts: + +- A mechanism for the client to describe unneeded or unwanted objects to + the server. + +- A mechanism for the server to omit such unwanted objects from packfiles + sent to the client. + +- A mechanism for the client to gracefully handle missing objects (that + were previously omitted by the server). + +- A mechanism for the client to backfill missing objects as needed. + + +Design Details +-------------- + +- A new pack-protocol capability "filter" is added to the fetch-pack and + upload-pack negotiation. ++ +This uses the existing capability discovery mechanism. +See "filter" in linkgit:gitprotocol-pack[5]. + +- Clients pass a "filter-spec" to clone and fetch which is passed to the + server to request filtering during packfile construction. ++ +There are various filters available to accommodate different situations. +See "--filter=<filter-spec>" in Documentation/rev-list-options.txt. + +- On the server pack-objects applies the requested filter-spec as it + creates "filtered" packfiles for the client. ++ +These filtered packfiles are *incomplete* in the traditional sense because +they may contain objects that reference objects not contained in the +packfile and that the client doesn't already have. For example, the +filtered packfile may contain trees or tags that reference missing blobs +or commits that reference missing trees. + +- On the client these incomplete packfiles are marked as "promisor packfiles" + and treated differently by various commands. + +- On the client a repository extension is added to the local config to + prevent older versions of git from failing mid-operation because of + missing objects that they cannot handle. + See "extensions.partialClone" in Documentation/technical/repository-version.txt" + + +Handling Missing Objects +------------------------ + +- An object may be missing due to a partial clone or fetch, or missing + due to repository corruption. To differentiate these cases, the + local repository specially indicates such filtered packfiles + obtained from promisor remotes as "promisor packfiles". ++ +These promisor packfiles consist of a "<name>.promisor" file with +arbitrary contents (like the "<name>.keep" files), in addition to +their "<name>.pack" and "<name>.idx" files. + +- The local repository considers a "promisor object" to be an object that + it knows (to the best of its ability) that promisor remotes have promised + that they have, either because the local repository has that object in one of + its promisor packfiles, or because another promisor object refers to it. ++ +When Git encounters a missing object, Git can see if it is a promisor object +and handle it appropriately. If not, Git can report a corruption. ++ +This means that there is no need for the client to explicitly maintain an +expensive-to-modify list of missing objects.[a] + +- Since almost all Git code currently expects any referenced object to be + present locally and because we do not want to force every command to do + a dry-run first, a fallback mechanism is added to allow Git to attempt + to dynamically fetch missing objects from promisor remotes. ++ +When the normal object lookup fails to find an object, Git invokes +promisor_remote_get_direct() to try to get the object from a promisor +remote and then retry the object lookup. This allows objects to be +"faulted in" without complicated prediction algorithms. ++ +For efficiency reasons, no check as to whether the missing object is +actually a promisor object is performed. ++ +Dynamic object fetching tends to be slow as objects are fetched one at +a time. + +- `checkout` (and any other command using `unpack-trees`) has been taught + to bulk pre-fetch all required missing blobs in a single batch. + +- `rev-list` has been taught to print missing objects. ++ +This can be used by other commands to bulk prefetch objects. +For example, a "git log -p A..B" may internally want to first do +something like "git rev-list --objects --quiet --missing=print A..B" +and prefetch those objects in bulk. + +- `fsck` has been updated to be fully aware of promisor objects. + +- `repack` in GC has been updated to not touch promisor packfiles at all, + and to only repack other objects. + +- The global variable "fetch_if_missing" is used to control whether an + object lookup will attempt to dynamically fetch a missing object or + report an error. ++ +We are not happy with this global variable and would like to remove it, +but that requires significant refactoring of the object code to pass an +additional flag. + + +Fetching Missing Objects +------------------------ + +- Fetching of objects is done by invoking a "git fetch" subprocess. + +- The local repository sends a request with the hashes of all requested + objects, and does not perform any packfile negotiation. + It then receives a packfile. + +- Because we are reusing the existing fetch mechanism, fetching + currently fetches all objects referred to by the requested objects, even + though they are not necessary. + +- Fetching with `--refetch` will request a complete new filtered packfile from + the remote, which can be used to change a filter without needing to + dynamically fetch missing objects. + +Using many promisor remotes +--------------------------- + +Many promisor remotes can be configured and used. + +This allows for example a user to have multiple geographically-close +cache servers for fetching missing blobs while continuing to do +filtered `git-fetch` commands from the central server. + +When fetching objects, promisor remotes are tried one after the other +until all the objects have been fetched. + +Remotes that are considered "promisor" remotes are those specified by +the following configuration variables: + +- `extensions.partialClone = <name>` + +- `remote.<name>.promisor = true` + +- `remote.<name>.partialCloneFilter = ...` + +Only one promisor remote can be configured using the +`extensions.partialClone` config variable. This promisor remote will +be the last one tried when fetching objects. + +We decided to make it the last one we try, because it is likely that +someone using many promisor remotes is doing so because the other +promisor remotes are better for some reason (maybe they are closer or +faster for some kind of objects) than the origin, and the origin is +likely to be the remote specified by extensions.partialClone. + +This justification is not very strong, but one choice had to be made, +and anyway the long term plan should be to make the order somehow +fully configurable. + +For now though the other promisor remotes will be tried in the order +they appear in the config file. + +Current Limitations +------------------- + +- It is not possible to specify the order in which the promisor + remotes are tried in other ways than the order in which they appear + in the config file. ++ +It is also not possible to specify an order to be used when fetching +from one remote and a different order when fetching from another +remote. + +- It is not possible to push only specific objects to a promisor + remote. ++ +It is not possible to push at the same time to multiple promisor +remote in a specific order. + +- Dynamic object fetching will only ask promisor remotes for missing + objects. We assume that promisor remotes have a complete view of the + repository and can satisfy all such requests. + +- Repack essentially treats promisor and non-promisor packfiles as 2 + distinct partitions and does not mix them. + +- Dynamic object fetching invokes fetch-pack once *for each item* + because most algorithms stumble upon a missing object and need to have + it resolved before continuing their work. This may incur significant + overhead -- and multiple authentication requests -- if many objects are + needed. + +- Dynamic object fetching currently uses the existing pack protocol V0 + which means that each object is requested via fetch-pack. The server + will send a full set of info/refs when the connection is established. + If there are large number of refs, this may incur significant overhead. + + +Future Work +----------- + +- Improve the way to specify the order in which promisor remotes are + tried. ++ +For example this could allow to specify explicitly something like: +"When fetching from this remote, I want to use these promisor remotes +in this order, though, when pushing or fetching to that remote, I want +to use those promisor remotes in that order." + +- Allow pushing to promisor remotes. ++ +The user might want to work in a triangular work flow with multiple +promisor remotes that each have an incomplete view of the repository. + +- Allow non-pathname-based filters to make use of packfile bitmaps (when + present). This was just an omission during the initial implementation. + +- Investigate use of a long-running process to dynamically fetch a series + of objects, such as proposed in [5,6] to reduce process startup and + overhead costs. ++ +It would be nice if pack protocol V2 could allow that long-running +process to make a series of requests over a single long-running +connection. + +- Investigate pack protocol V2 to avoid the info/refs broadcast on + each connection with the server to dynamically fetch missing objects. + +- Investigate the need to handle loose promisor objects. ++ +Objects in promisor packfiles are allowed to reference missing objects +that can be dynamically fetched from the server. An assumption was +made that loose objects are only created locally and therefore should +not reference a missing object. We may need to revisit that assumption +if, for example, we dynamically fetch a missing tree and store it as a +loose object rather than a single object packfile. ++ +This does not necessarily mean we need to mark loose objects as promisor; +it may be sufficient to relax the object lookup or is-promisor functions. + + +Non-Tasks +--------- + +- Every time the subject of "demand loading blobs" comes up it seems + that someone suggests that the server be allowed to "guess" and send + additional objects that may be related to the requested objects. ++ +No work has gone into actually doing that; we're just documenting that +it is a common suggestion. We're not sure how it would work and have +no plans to work on it. ++ +It is valid for the server to send more objects than requested (even +for a dynamic object fetch), but we are not building on that. + + +Footnotes +--------- + +[a] expensive-to-modify list of missing objects: Earlier in the design of + partial clone we discussed the need for a single list of missing objects. + This would essentially be a sorted linear list of OIDs that the were + omitted by the server during a clone or subsequent fetches. + +This file would need to be loaded into memory on every object lookup. +It would need to be read, updated, and re-written (like the .git/index) +on every explicit "git fetch" command *and* on any dynamic object fetch. + +The cost to read, update, and write this file could add significant +overhead to every command if there are many missing objects. For example, +if there are 100M missing blobs, this file would be at least 2GiB on disk. + +With the "promisor" concept, we *infer* a missing object based upon the +type of packfile that references it. + + +Related Links +------------- +[0] https://crbug.com/git/2 + Bug#2: Partial Clone + +[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20170113155253.1644-1-benpeart@microsoft.com/ + + Subject: [RFC] Add support for downloading blobs on demand + + Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:52:53 -0500 + +[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/cover.1506714999.git.jonathantanmy@google.com/ + + Subject: [PATCH 00/18] Partial clone (from clone to lazy fetch in 18 patches) + + Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:11:36 -0700 + +[3] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20170426221346.25337-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/ + + Subject: Proposal for missing blob support in Git repos + + Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:13:46 -0700 + +[4] https://lore.kernel.org/git/1488999039-37631-1-git-send-email-git@jeffhostetler.com/ + + Subject: [PATCH 00/10] RFC Partial Clone and Fetch + + Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:50:29 +0000 + +[5] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20170505152802.6724-1-benpeart@microsoft.com/ + + Subject: [PATCH v7 00/10] refactor the filter process code into a reusable module + + Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 11:27:52 -0400 + +[6] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20170714132651.170708-1-benpeart@microsoft.com/ + + Subject: [RFC/PATCH v2 0/1] Add support for downloading blobs on demand + + Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:26:50 -0400 diff --git a/Documentation/technical/racy-git.txt b/Documentation/technical/racy-git.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ceda4bb --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/racy-git.txt @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@ +Use of index and Racy Git problem +================================= + +Background +---------- + +The index is one of the most important data structures in Git. +It represents a virtual working tree state by recording list of +paths and their object names and serves as a staging area to +write out the next tree object to be committed. The state is +"virtual" in the sense that it does not necessarily have to, and +often does not, match the files in the working tree. + +There are cases Git needs to examine the differences between the +virtual working tree state in the index and the files in the +working tree. The most obvious case is when the user asks `git +diff` (or its low level implementation, `git diff-files`) or +`git-ls-files --modified`. In addition, Git internally checks +if the files in the working tree are different from what are +recorded in the index to avoid stomping on local changes in them +during patch application, switching branches, and merging. + +In order to speed up this comparison between the files in the +working tree and the index entries, the index entries record the +information obtained from the filesystem via `lstat(2)` system +call when they were last updated. When checking if they differ, +Git first runs `lstat(2)` on the files and compares the result +with this information (this is what was originally done by the +`ce_match_stat()` function, but the current code does it in +`ce_match_stat_basic()` function). If some of these "cached +stat information" fields do not match, Git can tell that the +files are modified without even looking at their contents. + +Note: not all members in `struct stat` obtained via `lstat(2)` +are used for this comparison. For example, `st_atime` obviously +is not useful. Currently, Git compares the file type (regular +files vs symbolic links) and executable bits (only for regular +files) from `st_mode` member, `st_mtime` and `st_ctime` +timestamps, `st_uid`, `st_gid`, `st_ino`, and `st_size` members. +With a `USE_STDEV` compile-time option, `st_dev` is also +compared, but this is not enabled by default because this member +is not stable on network filesystems. With `USE_NSEC` +compile-time option, `st_mtim.tv_nsec` and `st_ctim.tv_nsec` +members are also compared. On Linux, this is not enabled by default +because in-core timestamps can have finer granularity than +on-disk timestamps, resulting in meaningless changes when an +inode is evicted from the inode cache. See commit 8ce13b0 +of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git +([PATCH] Sync in core time granularity with filesystems, +2005-01-04). This patch is included in kernel 2.6.11 and newer, but +only fixes the issue for file systems with exactly 1 ns or 1 s +resolution. Other file systems are still broken in current Linux +kernels (e.g. CEPH, CIFS, NTFS, UDF), see +https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5577240D.7020309@gmail.com/ + +Racy Git +-------- + +There is one slight problem with the optimization based on the +cached stat information. Consider this sequence: + + : modify 'foo' + $ git update-index 'foo' + : modify 'foo' again, in-place, without changing its size + +The first `update-index` computes the object name of the +contents of file `foo` and updates the index entry for `foo` +along with the `struct stat` information. If the modification +that follows it happens very fast so that the file's `st_mtime` +timestamp does not change, after this sequence, the cached stat +information the index entry records still exactly match what you +would see in the filesystem, even though the file `foo` is now +different. +This way, Git can incorrectly think files in the working tree +are unmodified even though they actually are. This is called +the "racy Git" problem (discovered by Pasky), and the entries +that appear clean when they may not be because of this problem +are called "racily clean". + +To avoid this problem, Git does two things: + +. When the cached stat information says the file has not been + modified, and the `st_mtime` is the same as (or newer than) + the timestamp of the index file itself (which is the time `git + update-index foo` finished running in the above example), it + also compares the contents with the object registered in the + index entry to make sure they match. + +. When the index file is updated that contains racily clean + entries, cached `st_size` information is truncated to zero + before writing a new version of the index file. + +Because the index file itself is written after collecting all +the stat information from updated paths, `st_mtime` timestamp of +it is usually the same as or newer than any of the paths the +index contains. And no matter how quick the modification that +follows `git update-index foo` finishes, the resulting +`st_mtime` timestamp on `foo` cannot get a value earlier +than the index file. Therefore, index entries that can be +racily clean are limited to the ones that have the same +timestamp as the index file itself. + +The callers that want to check if an index entry matches the +corresponding file in the working tree continue to call +`ce_match_stat()`, but with this change, `ce_match_stat()` uses +`ce_modified_check_fs()` to see if racily clean ones are +actually clean after comparing the cached stat information using +`ce_match_stat_basic()`. + +The problem the latter solves is this sequence: + + $ git update-index 'foo' + : modify 'foo' in-place without changing its size + : wait for enough time + $ git update-index 'bar' + +Without the latter, the timestamp of the index file gets a newer +value, and falsely clean entry `foo` would not be caught by the +timestamp comparison check done with the former logic anymore. +The latter makes sure that the cached stat information for `foo` +would never match with the file in the working tree, so later +checks by `ce_match_stat_basic()` would report that the index entry +does not match the file and Git does not have to fall back on more +expensive `ce_modified_check_fs()`. + + +Runtime penalty +--------------- + +The runtime penalty of falling back to `ce_modified_check_fs()` +from `ce_match_stat()` can be very expensive when there are many +racily clean entries. An obvious way to artificially create +this situation is to give the same timestamp to all the files in +the working tree in a large project, run `git update-index` on +them, and give the same timestamp to the index file: + + $ date >.datestamp + $ git ls-files | xargs touch -r .datestamp + $ git ls-files | git update-index --stdin + $ touch -r .datestamp .git/index + +This will make all index entries racily clean. The linux project, for +example, there are over 20,000 files in the working tree. On my +Athlon 64 X2 3800+, after the above: + + $ /usr/bin/time git diff-files + 1.68user 0.54system 0:02.22elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k + 0inputs+0outputs (0major+67111minor)pagefaults 0swaps + $ git update-index MAINTAINERS + $ /usr/bin/time git diff-files + 0.02user 0.12system 0:00.14elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k + 0inputs+0outputs (0major+935minor)pagefaults 0swaps + +Running `git update-index` in the middle checked the racily +clean entries, and left the cached `st_mtime` for all the paths +intact because they were actually clean (so this step took about +the same amount of time as the first `git diff-files`). After +that, they are not racily clean anymore but are truly clean, so +the second invocation of `git diff-files` fully took advantage +of the cached stat information. + + +Avoiding runtime penalty +------------------------ + +In order to avoid the above runtime penalty, post 1.4.2 Git used +to have a code that made sure the index file +got timestamp newer than the youngest files in the index when +there are many young files with the same timestamp as the +resulting index file would otherwise would have by waiting +before finishing writing the index file out. + +I suspected that in practice the situation where many paths in the +index are all racily clean was quite rare. The only code paths +that can record recent timestamp for large number of paths are: + +. Initial `git add .` of a large project. + +. `git checkout` of a large project from an empty index into an + unpopulated working tree. + +Note: switching branches with `git checkout` keeps the cached +stat information of existing working tree files that are the +same between the current branch and the new branch, which are +all older than the resulting index file, and they will not +become racily clean. Only the files that are actually checked +out can become racily clean. + +In a large project where raciness avoidance cost really matters, +however, the initial computation of all object names in the +index takes more than one second, and the index file is written +out after all that happens. Therefore the timestamp of the +index file will be more than one seconds later than the +youngest file in the working tree. This means that in these +cases there actually will not be any racily clean entry in +the resulting index. + +Based on this discussion, the current code does not use the +"workaround" to avoid the runtime penalty that does not exist in +practice anymore. This was done with commit 0fc82cff on Aug 15, +2006. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/reftable.txt b/Documentation/technical/reftable.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6a67cc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/reftable.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1098 @@ +reftable +-------- + +Overview +~~~~~~~~ + +Problem statement +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Some repositories contain a lot of references (e.g. android at 866k, +rails at 31k). The existing packed-refs format takes up a lot of space +(e.g. 62M), and does not scale with additional references. Lookup of a +single reference requires linearly scanning the file. + +Atomic pushes modifying multiple references require copying the entire +packed-refs file, which can be a considerable amount of data moved +(e.g. 62M in, 62M out) for even small transactions (2 refs modified). + +Repositories with many loose references occupy a large number of disk +blocks from the local file system, as each reference is its own file +storing 41 bytes (and another file for the corresponding reflog). This +negatively affects the number of inodes available when a large number of +repositories are stored on the same filesystem. Readers can be penalized +due to the larger number of syscalls required to traverse and read the +`$GIT_DIR/refs` directory. + + +Objectives +^^^^^^^^^^ + +* Near constant time lookup for any single reference, even when the +repository is cold and not in process or kernel cache. +* Near constant time verification if an object name is referred to by at least +one reference (for allow-tip-sha1-in-want). +* Efficient enumeration of an entire namespace, such as `refs/tags/`. +* Support atomic push with `O(size_of_update)` operations. +* Combine reflog storage with ref storage for small transactions. +* Separate reflog storage for base refs and historical logs. + +Description +^^^^^^^^^^^ + +A reftable file is a portable binary file format customized for +reference storage. References are sorted, enabling linear scans, binary +search lookup, and range scans. + +Storage in the file is organized into variable sized blocks. Prefix +compression is used within a single block to reduce disk space. Block +size and alignment is tunable by the writer. + +Performance +^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Space used, packed-refs vs. reftable: + +[cols=",>,>,>,>,>",options="header",] +|=============================================================== +|repository |packed-refs |reftable |% original |avg ref |avg obj +|android |62.2 M |36.1 M |58.0% |33 bytes |5 bytes +|rails |1.8 M |1.1 M |57.7% |29 bytes |4 bytes +|git |78.7 K |48.1 K |61.0% |50 bytes |4 bytes +|git (heads) |332 b |269 b |81.0% |33 bytes |0 bytes +|=============================================================== + +Scan (read 866k refs), by reference name lookup (single ref from 866k +refs), and by SHA-1 lookup (refs with that SHA-1, from 866k refs): + +[cols=",>,>,>,>",options="header",] +|========================================================= +|format |cache |scan |by name |by SHA-1 +|packed-refs |cold |402 ms |409,660.1 usec |412,535.8 usec +|packed-refs |hot | |6,844.6 usec |20,110.1 usec +|reftable |cold |112 ms |33.9 usec |323.2 usec +|reftable |hot | |20.2 usec |320.8 usec +|========================================================= + +Space used for 149,932 log entries for 43,061 refs, reflog vs. reftable: + +[cols=",>,>",options="header",] +|================================ +|format |size |avg entry +|$GIT_DIR/logs |173 M |1209 bytes +|reftable |5 M |37 bytes +|================================ + +Details +~~~~~~~ + +Peeling +^^^^^^^ + +References stored in a reftable are peeled, a record for an annotated +(or signed) tag records both the tag object, and the object it refers +to. This is analogous to storage in the packed-refs format. + +Reference name encoding +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Reference names are an uninterpreted sequence of bytes that must pass +linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1] as a valid reference name. + +Key unicity +^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Each entry must have a unique key; repeated keys are disallowed. + +Network byte order +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +All multi-byte, fixed width fields are in network byte order. + +Varint encoding +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Varint encoding is identical to the ofs-delta encoding method used +within pack files. + +Decoder works such as: + +.... +val = buf[ptr] & 0x7f +while (buf[ptr] & 0x80) { + ptr++ + val = ((val + 1) << 7) | (buf[ptr] & 0x7f) +} +.... + +Ordering +^^^^^^^^ + +Blocks are lexicographically ordered by their first reference. + +Directory/file conflicts +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +The reftable format accepts both `refs/heads/foo` and +`refs/heads/foo/bar` as distinct references. + +This property is useful for retaining log records in reftable, but may +confuse versions of Git using `$GIT_DIR/refs` directory tree to maintain +references. Users of reftable may choose to continue to reject `foo` and +`foo/bar` type conflicts to prevent problems for peers. + +File format +~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Structure +^^^^^^^^^ + +A reftable file has the following high-level structure: + +.... +first_block { + header + first_ref_block +} +ref_block* +ref_index* +obj_block* +obj_index* +log_block* +log_index* +footer +.... + +A log-only file omits the `ref_block`, `ref_index`, `obj_block` and +`obj_index` sections, containing only the file header and log block: + +.... +first_block { + header +} +log_block* +log_index* +footer +.... + +in a log-only file the first log block immediately follows the file +header, without padding to block alignment. + +Block size +^^^^^^^^^^ + +The file's block size is arbitrarily determined by the writer, and does +not have to be a power of 2. The block size must be larger than the +longest reference name or log entry used in the repository, as +references cannot span blocks. + +Powers of two that are friendly to the virtual memory system or +filesystem (such as 4k or 8k) are recommended. Larger sizes (64k) can +yield better compression, with a possible increased cost incurred by +readers during access. + +The largest block size is `16777215` bytes (15.99 MiB). + +Block alignment +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Writers may choose to align blocks at multiples of the block size by +including `padding` filled with NUL bytes at the end of a block to round +out to the chosen alignment. When alignment is used, writers must +specify the alignment with the file header's `block_size` field. + +Block alignment is not required by the file format. Unaligned files must +set `block_size = 0` in the file header, and omit `padding`. Unaligned +files with more than one ref block must include the link:#Ref-index[ref +index] to support fast lookup. Readers must be able to read both aligned +and non-aligned files. + +Very small files (e.g. a single ref block) may omit `padding` and the ref +index to reduce total file size. + +Header (version 1) +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +A 24-byte header appears at the beginning of the file: + +.... +'REFT' +uint8( version_number = 1 ) +uint24( block_size ) +uint64( min_update_index ) +uint64( max_update_index ) +.... + +Aligned files must specify `block_size` to configure readers with the +expected block alignment. Unaligned files must set `block_size = 0`. + +The `min_update_index` and `max_update_index` describe bounds for the +`update_index` field of all log records in this file. When reftables are +used in a stack for link:#Update-transactions[transactions], these +fields can order the files such that the prior file's +`max_update_index + 1` is the next file's `min_update_index`. + +Header (version 2) +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +A 28-byte header appears at the beginning of the file: + +.... +'REFT' +uint8( version_number = 2 ) +uint24( block_size ) +uint64( min_update_index ) +uint64( max_update_index ) +uint32( hash_id ) +.... + +The header is identical to `version_number=1`, with the 4-byte hash ID +("sha1" for SHA1 and "s256" for SHA-256) append to the header. + +For maximum backward compatibility, it is recommended to use version 1 when +writing SHA1 reftables. + +First ref block +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +The first ref block shares the same block as the file header, and is 24 +bytes smaller than all other blocks in the file. The first block +immediately begins after the file header, at position 24. + +If the first block is a log block (a log-only file), its block header +begins immediately at position 24. + +Ref block format +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +A ref block is written as: + +.... +'r' +uint24( block_len ) +ref_record+ +uint24( restart_offset )+ +uint16( restart_count ) + +padding? +.... + +Blocks begin with `block_type = 'r'` and a 3-byte `block_len` which +encodes the number of bytes in the block up to, but not including the +optional `padding`. This is always less than or equal to the file's +block size. In the first ref block, `block_len` includes 24 bytes for +the file header. + +The 2-byte `restart_count` stores the number of entries in the +`restart_offset` list, which must not be empty. Readers can use +`restart_count` to binary search between restarts before starting a +linear scan. + +Exactly `restart_count` 3-byte `restart_offset` values precedes the +`restart_count`. Offsets are relative to the start of the block and +refer to the first byte of any `ref_record` whose name has not been +prefix compressed. Entries in the `restart_offset` list must be sorted, +ascending. Readers can start linear scans from any of these records. + +A variable number of `ref_record` fill the middle of the block, +describing reference names and values. The format is described below. + +As the first ref block shares the first file block with the file header, +all `restart_offset` in the first block are relative to the start of the +file (position 0), and include the file header. This forces the first +`restart_offset` to be `28`. + +ref record +++++++++++ + +A `ref_record` describes a single reference, storing both the name and +its value(s). Records are formatted as: + +.... +varint( prefix_length ) +varint( (suffix_length << 3) | value_type ) +suffix +varint( update_index_delta ) +value? +.... + +The `prefix_length` field specifies how many leading bytes of the prior +reference record's name should be copied to obtain this reference's +name. This must be 0 for the first reference in any block, and also must +be 0 for any `ref_record` whose offset is listed in the `restart_offset` +table at the end of the block. + +Recovering a reference name from any `ref_record` is a simple concat: + +.... +this_name = prior_name[0..prefix_length] + suffix +.... + +The `suffix_length` value provides the number of bytes available in +`suffix` to copy from `suffix` to complete the reference name. + +The `update_index` that last modified the reference can be obtained by +adding `update_index_delta` to the `min_update_index` from the file +header: `min_update_index + update_index_delta`. + +The `value` follows. Its format is determined by `value_type`, one of +the following: + +* `0x0`: deletion; no value data (see transactions, below) +* `0x1`: one object name; value of the ref +* `0x2`: two object names; value of the ref, peeled target +* `0x3`: symbolic reference: `varint( target_len ) target` + +Symbolic references use `0x3`, followed by the complete name of the +reference target. No compression is applied to the target name. + +Types `0x4..0x7` are reserved for future use. + +Ref index +^^^^^^^^^ + +The ref index stores the name of the last reference from every ref block +in the file, enabling reduced disk seeks for lookups. Any reference can +be found by searching the index, identifying the containing block, and +searching within that block. + +The index may be organized into a multi-level index, where the 1st level +index block points to additional ref index blocks (2nd level), which may +in turn point to either additional index blocks (e.g. 3rd level) or ref +blocks (leaf level). Disk reads required to access a ref go up with +higher index levels. Multi-level indexes may be required to ensure no +single index block exceeds the file format's max block size of +`16777215` bytes (15.99 MiB). To achieve constant O(1) disk seeks for +lookups the index must be a single level, which is permitted to exceed +the file's configured block size, but not the format's max block size of +15.99 MiB. + +If present, the ref index block(s) appears after the last ref block. + +If there are at least 4 ref blocks, a ref index block should be written +to improve lookup times. Cold reads using the index require 2 disk reads +(read index, read block), and binary searching < 4 blocks also requires +<= 2 reads. Omitting the index block from smaller files saves space. + +If the file is unaligned and contains more than one ref block, the ref +index must be written. + +Index block format: + +.... +'i' +uint24( block_len ) +index_record+ +uint24( restart_offset )+ +uint16( restart_count ) + +padding? +.... + +The index blocks begin with `block_type = 'i'` and a 3-byte `block_len` +which encodes the number of bytes in the block, up to but not including +the optional `padding`. + +The `restart_offset` and `restart_count` fields are identical in format, +meaning and usage as in ref blocks. + +To reduce the number of reads required for random access in very large +files the index block may be larger than other blocks. However, readers +must hold the entire index in memory to benefit from this, so it's a +time-space tradeoff in both file size and reader memory. + +Increasing the file's block size decreases the index size. Alternatively +a multi-level index may be used, keeping index blocks within the file's +block size, but increasing the number of blocks that need to be +accessed. + +index record +++++++++++++ + +An index record describes the last entry in another block. Index records +are written as: + +.... +varint( prefix_length ) +varint( (suffix_length << 3) | 0 ) +suffix +varint( block_position ) +.... + +Index records use prefix compression exactly like `ref_record`. + +Index records store `block_position` after the suffix, specifying the +absolute position in bytes (from the start of the file) of the block +that ends with this reference. Readers can seek to `block_position` to +begin reading the block header. + +Readers must examine the block header at `block_position` to determine +if the next block is another level index block, or the leaf-level ref +block. + +Reading the index ++++++++++++++++++ + +Readers loading the ref index must first read the footer (below) to +obtain `ref_index_position`. If not present, the position will be 0. The +`ref_index_position` is for the 1st level root of the ref index. + +Obj block format +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Object blocks are optional. Writers may choose to omit object blocks, +especially if readers will not use the object name to ref mapping. + +Object blocks use unique, abbreviated 2-31 byte object name keys, mapping to +ref blocks containing references pointing to that object directly, or as +the peeled value of an annotated tag. Like ref blocks, object blocks use +the file's standard block size. The abbreviation length is available in +the footer as `obj_id_len`. + +To save space in small files, object blocks may be omitted if the ref +index is not present, as brute force search will only need to read a few +ref blocks. When missing, readers should brute force a linear search of +all references to lookup by object name. + +An object block is written as: + +.... +'o' +uint24( block_len ) +obj_record+ +uint24( restart_offset )+ +uint16( restart_count ) + +padding? +.... + +Fields are identical to ref block. Binary search using the restart table +works the same as in reference blocks. + +Because object names are abbreviated by writers to the shortest unique +abbreviation within the reftable, obj key lengths have a variable length. Their +length must be at least 2 bytes. Readers must compare only for common prefix +match within an obj block or obj index. + +obj record +++++++++++ + +An `obj_record` describes a single object abbreviation, and the blocks +containing references using that unique abbreviation: + +.... +varint( prefix_length ) +varint( (suffix_length << 3) | cnt_3 ) +suffix +varint( cnt_large )? +varint( position_delta )* +.... + +Like in reference blocks, abbreviations are prefix compressed within an +obj block. On large reftables with many unique objects, higher block +sizes (64k), and higher restart interval (128), a `prefix_length` of 2 +or 3 and `suffix_length` of 3 may be common in obj records (unique +abbreviation of 5-6 raw bytes, 10-12 hex digits). + +Each record contains `position_count` number of positions for matching +ref blocks. For 1-7 positions the count is stored in `cnt_3`. When +`cnt_3 = 0` the actual count follows in a varint, `cnt_large`. + +The use of `cnt_3` bets most objects are pointed to by only a single +reference, some may be pointed to by a couple of references, and very +few (if any) are pointed to by more than 7 references. + +A special case exists when `cnt_3 = 0` and `cnt_large = 0`: there are no +`position_delta`, but at least one reference starts with this +abbreviation. A reader that needs exact reference names must scan all +references to find which specific references have the desired object. +Writers should use this format when the `position_delta` list would have +overflowed the file's block size due to a high number of references +pointing to the same object. + +The first `position_delta` is the position from the start of the file. +Additional `position_delta` entries are sorted ascending and relative to +the prior entry, e.g. a reader would perform: + +.... +pos = position_delta[0] +prior = pos +for (j = 1; j < position_count; j++) { + pos = prior + position_delta[j] + prior = pos +} +.... + +With a position in hand, a reader must linearly scan the ref block, +starting from the first `ref_record`, testing each reference's object names +(for `value_type = 0x1` or `0x2`) for full equality. Faster searching by +object name within a single ref block is not supported by the reftable format. +Smaller block sizes reduce the number of candidates this step must +consider. + +Obj index +^^^^^^^^^ + +The obj index stores the abbreviation from the last entry for every obj +block in the file, enabling reduced disk seeks for all lookups. It is +formatted exactly the same as the ref index, but refers to obj blocks. + +The obj index should be present if obj blocks are present, as obj blocks +should only be written in larger files. + +Readers loading the obj index must first read the footer (below) to +obtain `obj_index_position`. If not present, the position will be 0. + +Log block format +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Unlike ref and obj blocks, log blocks are always unaligned. + +Log blocks are variable in size, and do not match the `block_size` +specified in the file header or footer. Writers should choose an +appropriate buffer size to prepare a log block for deflation, such as +`2 * block_size`. + +A log block is written as: + +.... +'g' +uint24( block_len ) +zlib_deflate { + log_record+ + uint24( restart_offset )+ + uint16( restart_count ) +} +.... + +Log blocks look similar to ref blocks, except `block_type = 'g'`. + +The 4-byte block header is followed by the deflated block contents using +zlib deflate. The `block_len` in the header is the inflated size +(including 4-byte block header), and should be used by readers to +preallocate the inflation output buffer. A log block's `block_len` may +exceed the file's block size. + +Offsets within the log block (e.g. `restart_offset`) still include the +4-byte header. Readers may prefer prefixing the inflation output buffer +with the 4-byte header. + +Within the deflate container, a variable number of `log_record` describe +reference changes. The log record format is described below. See ref +block format (above) for a description of `restart_offset` and +`restart_count`. + +Because log blocks have no alignment or padding between blocks, readers +must keep track of the bytes consumed by the inflater to know where the +next log block begins. + +log record +++++++++++ + +Log record keys are structured as: + +.... +ref_name '\0' reverse_int64( update_index ) +.... + +where `update_index` is the unique transaction identifier. The +`update_index` field must be unique within the scope of a `ref_name`. +See the update transactions section below for further details. + +The `reverse_int64` function inverses the value so lexicographical +ordering the network byte order encoding sorts the more recent records +with higher `update_index` values first: + +.... +reverse_int64(int64 t) { + return 0xffffffffffffffff - t; +} +.... + +Log records have a similar starting structure to ref and index records, +utilizing the same prefix compression scheme applied to the log record +key described above. + +.... + varint( prefix_length ) + varint( (suffix_length << 3) | log_type ) + suffix + log_data { + old_id + new_id + varint( name_length ) name + varint( email_length ) email + varint( time_seconds ) + sint16( tz_offset ) + varint( message_length ) message + }? +.... + +Log record entries use `log_type` to indicate what follows: + +* `0x0`: deletion; no log data. +* `0x1`: standard git reflog data using `log_data` above. + +The `log_type = 0x0` is mostly useful for `git stash drop`, removing an +entry from the reflog of `refs/stash` in a transaction file (below), +without needing to rewrite larger files. Readers reading a stack of +reflogs must treat this as a deletion. + +For `log_type = 0x1`, the `log_data` section follows +linkgit:git-update-ref[1] logging and includes: + +* two object names (old id, new id) +* varint string of committer's name +* varint string of committer's email +* varint time in seconds since epoch (Jan 1, 1970) +* 2-byte timezone offset in minutes (signed) +* varint string of message + +`tz_offset` is the absolute number of minutes from GMT the committer was +at the time of the update. For example `GMT-0800` is encoded in reftable +as `sint16(-480)` and `GMT+0230` is `sint16(150)`. + +The committer email does not contain `<` or `>`, it's the value normally +found between the `<>` in a git commit object header. + +The `message_length` may be 0, in which case there was no message +supplied for the update. + +Contrary to traditional reflog (which is a file), renames are encoded as +a combination of ref deletion and ref creation. A deletion is a log +record with a zero new_id, and a creation is a log record with a zero old_id. + +Reading the log ++++++++++++++++ + +Readers accessing the log must first read the footer (below) to +determine the `log_position`. The first block of the log begins at +`log_position` bytes since the start of the file. The `log_position` is +not block aligned. + +Importing logs +++++++++++++++ + +When importing from `$GIT_DIR/logs` writers should globally order all +log records roughly by timestamp while preserving file order, and assign +unique, increasing `update_index` values for each log line. Newer log +records get higher `update_index` values. + +Although an import may write only a single reftable file, the reftable +file must span many unique `update_index`, as each log line requires its +own `update_index` to preserve semantics. + +Log index +^^^^^^^^^ + +The log index stores the log key +(`refname \0 reverse_int64(update_index)`) for the last log record of +every log block in the file, supporting bounded-time lookup. + +A log index block must be written if 2 or more log blocks are written to +the file. If present, the log index appears after the last log block. +There is no padding used to align the log index to block alignment. + +Log index format is identical to ref index, except the keys are 9 bytes +longer to include `'\0'` and the 8-byte `reverse_int64(update_index)`. +Records use `block_position` to refer to the start of a log block. + +Reading the index ++++++++++++++++++ + +Readers loading the log index must first read the footer (below) to +obtain `log_index_position`. If not present, the position will be 0. + +Footer +^^^^^^ + +After the last block of the file, a file footer is written. It begins +like the file header, but is extended with additional data. + +.... + HEADER + + uint64( ref_index_position ) + uint64( (obj_position << 5) | obj_id_len ) + uint64( obj_index_position ) + + uint64( log_position ) + uint64( log_index_position ) + + uint32( CRC-32 of above ) +.... + +If a section is missing (e.g. ref index) the corresponding position +field (e.g. `ref_index_position`) will be 0. + +* `obj_position`: byte position for the first obj block. +* `obj_id_len`: number of bytes used to abbreviate object names in +obj blocks. +* `log_position`: byte position for the first log block. +* `ref_index_position`: byte position for the start of the ref index. +* `obj_index_position`: byte position for the start of the obj index. +* `log_index_position`: byte position for the start of the log index. + +The size of the footer is 68 bytes for version 1, and 72 bytes for +version 2. + +Reading the footer +++++++++++++++++++ + +Readers must first read the file start to determine the version +number. Then they seek to `file_length - FOOTER_LENGTH` to access the +footer. A trusted external source (such as `stat(2)`) is necessary to +obtain `file_length`. When reading the footer, readers must verify: + +* 4-byte magic is correct +* 1-byte version number is recognized +* 4-byte CRC-32 matches the other 64 bytes (including magic, and +version) + +Once verified, the other fields of the footer can be accessed. + +Empty tables +++++++++++++ + +A reftable may be empty. In this case, the file starts with a header +and is immediately followed by a footer. + +Binary search +^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Binary search within a block is supported by the `restart_offset` fields +at the end of the block. Readers can binary search through the restart +table to locate between which two restart points the sought reference or +key should appear. + +Each record identified by a `restart_offset` stores the complete key in +the `suffix` field of the record, making the compare operation during +binary search straightforward. + +Once a restart point lexicographically before the sought reference has +been identified, readers can linearly scan through the following record +entries to locate the sought record, terminating if the current record +sorts after (and therefore the sought key is not present). + +Restart point selection ++++++++++++++++++++++++ + +Writers determine the restart points at file creation. The process is +arbitrary, but every 16 or 64 records is recommended. Every 16 may be +more suitable for smaller block sizes (4k or 8k), every 64 for larger +block sizes (64k). + +More frequent restart points reduces prefix compression and increases +space consumed by the restart table, both of which increase file size. + +Less frequent restart points makes prefix compression more effective, +decreasing overall file size, with increased penalties for readers +walking through more records after the binary search step. + +A maximum of `65535` restart points per block is supported. + +Considerations +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Lightweight refs dominate +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +The reftable format assumes the vast majority of references are single +object names valued with common prefixes, such as Gerrit Code Review's +`refs/changes/` namespace, GitHub's `refs/pulls/` namespace, or many +lightweight tags in the `refs/tags/` namespace. + +Annotated tags storing the peeled object cost an additional object name per +reference. + +Low overhead +^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +A reftable with very few references (e.g. git.git with 5 heads) is 269 +bytes for reftable, vs. 332 bytes for packed-refs. This supports +reftable scaling down for transaction logs (below). + +Block size +^^^^^^^^^^ + +For a Gerrit Code Review type repository with many change refs, larger +block sizes (64 KiB) and less frequent restart points (every 64) yield +better compression due to more references within the block compressing +against the prior reference. + +Larger block sizes reduce the index size, as the reftable will require +fewer blocks to store the same number of references. + +Minimal disk seeks +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Assuming the index block has been loaded into memory, binary searching +for any single reference requires exactly 1 disk seek to load the +containing block. + +Scans and lookups dominate +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Scanning all references and lookup by name (or namespace such as +`refs/heads/`) are the most common activities performed on repositories. +Object names are stored directly with references to optimize this use case. + +Logs are infrequently read +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Logs are infrequently accessed, but can be large. Deflating log blocks +saves disk space, with some increased penalty at read time. + +Logs are stored in an isolated section from refs, reducing the burden on +reference readers that want to ignore logs. Further, historical logs can +be isolated into log-only files. + +Logs are read backwards +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Logs are frequently accessed backwards (most recent N records for master +to answer `master@{4}`), so log records are grouped by reference, and +sorted descending by update index. + +Repository format +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Version 1 +^^^^^^^^^ + +A repository must set its `$GIT_DIR/config` to configure reftable: + +.... +[core] + repositoryformatversion = 1 +[extensions] + refStorage = reftable +.... + +Layout +^^^^^^ + +A collection of reftable files are stored in the `$GIT_DIR/reftable/` directory. +Their names should have a random element, such that each filename is globally +unique; this helps avoid spurious failures on Windows, where open files cannot +be removed or overwritten. It suggested to use +`${min_update_index}-${max_update_index}-${random}.ref` as a naming convention. + +Log-only files use the `.log` extension, while ref-only and mixed ref +and log files use `.ref`. extension. + +The stack ordering file is `$GIT_DIR/reftable/tables.list` and lists the +current files, one per line, in order, from oldest (base) to newest +(most recent): + +.... +$ cat .git/reftable/tables.list +00000001-00000001-RANDOM1.log +00000002-00000002-RANDOM2.ref +00000003-00000003-RANDOM3.ref +.... + +Readers must read `$GIT_DIR/reftable/tables.list` to determine which +files are relevant right now, and search through the stack in reverse +order (last reftable is examined first). + +Reftable files not listed in `tables.list` may be new (and about to be +added to the stack by the active writer), or ancient and ready to be +pruned. + +Backward compatibility +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Older clients should continue to recognize the directory as a git +repository so they don't look for an enclosing repository in parent +directories. To this end, a reftable-enabled repository must contain the +following dummy files + +* `.git/HEAD`, a regular file containing `ref: refs/heads/.invalid`. +* `.git/refs/`, a directory +* `.git/refs/heads`, a regular file + +Readers +^^^^^^^ + +Readers can obtain a consistent snapshot of the reference space by +following: + +1. Open and read the `tables.list` file. +2. Open each of the reftable files that it mentions. +3. If any of the files is missing, goto 1. +4. Read from the now-open files as long as necessary. + +Update transactions +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Although reftables are immutable, mutations are supported by writing a +new reftable and atomically appending it to the stack: + +1. Acquire `tables.list.lock`. +2. Read `tables.list` to determine current reftables. +3. Select `update_index` to be most recent file's +`max_update_index + 1`. +4. Prepare temp reftable `tmp_XXXXXX`, including log entries. +5. Rename `tmp_XXXXXX` to `${update_index}-${update_index}-${random}.ref`. +6. Copy `tables.list` to `tables.list.lock`, appending file from (5). +7. Rename `tables.list.lock` to `tables.list`. + +During step 4 the new file's `min_update_index` and `max_update_index` +are both set to the `update_index` selected by step 3. All log records +for the transaction use the same `update_index` in their keys. This +enables later correlation of which references were updated by the same +transaction. + +Because a single `tables.list.lock` file is used to manage locking, the +repository is single-threaded for writers. Writers may have to busy-spin +(with backoff) around creating `tables.list.lock`, for up to an +acceptable wait period, aborting if the repository is too busy to +mutate. Application servers wrapped around repositories (e.g. Gerrit +Code Review) can layer their own lock/wait queue to improve fairness to +writers. + +Reference deletions +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Deletion of any reference can be explicitly stored by setting the `type` +to `0x0` and omitting the `value` field of the `ref_record`. This serves +as a tombstone, overriding any assertions about the existence of the +reference from earlier files in the stack. + +Compaction +^^^^^^^^^^ + +A partial stack of reftables can be compacted by merging references +using a straightforward merge join across reftables, selecting the most +recent value for output, and omitting deleted references that do not +appear in remaining, lower reftables. + +A compacted reftable should set its `min_update_index` to the smallest +of the input files' `min_update_index`, and its `max_update_index` +likewise to the largest input `max_update_index`. + +For sake of illustration, assume the stack currently consists of +reftable files (from oldest to newest): A, B, C, and D. The compactor is +going to compact B and C, leaving A and D alone. + +1. Obtain lock `tables.list.lock` and read the `tables.list` file. +2. Obtain locks `B.lock` and `C.lock`. Ownership of these locks +prevents other processes from trying to compact these files. +3. Release `tables.list.lock`. +4. Compact `B` and `C` into a temp file +`${min_update_index}-${max_update_index}_XXXXXX`. +5. Reacquire lock `tables.list.lock`. +6. Verify that `B` and `C` are still in the stack, in that order. This +should always be the case, assuming that other processes are adhering to +the locking protocol. +7. Rename `${min_update_index}-${max_update_index}_XXXXXX` to +`${min_update_index}-${max_update_index}-${random}.ref`. +8. Write the new stack to `tables.list.lock`, replacing `B` and `C` +with the file from (4). +9. Rename `tables.list.lock` to `tables.list`. +10. Delete `B` and `C`, perhaps after a short sleep to avoid forcing +readers to backtrack. + +This strategy permits compactions to proceed independently of updates. + +Each reftable (compacted or not) is uniquely identified by its name, so +open reftables can be cached by their name. + +Windows +^^^^^^^ + +On windows, and other systems that do not allow deleting or renaming to open +files, compaction may succeed, but other readers may prevent obsolete tables +from being deleted. + +On these platforms, the following strategy can be followed: on closing a +reftable stack, reload `tables.list`, and delete any tables no longer mentioned +in `tables.list`. + +Irregular program exit may still leave about unused files. In this case, a +cleanup operation should proceed as follows: + +* take a lock `tables.list.lock` to prevent concurrent modifications +* refresh the reftable stack, by reading `tables.list` +* for each `*.ref` file, remove it if +** it is not mentioned in `tables.list`, and +** its max update_index is not beyond the max update_index of the stack + + +Alternatives considered +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +bzip packed-refs +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +`bzip2` can significantly shrink a large packed-refs file (e.g. 62 MiB +compresses to 23 MiB, 37%). However the bzip format does not support +random access to a single reference. Readers must inflate and discard +while performing a linear scan. + +Breaking packed-refs into chunks (individually compressing each chunk) +would reduce the amount of data a reader must inflate, but still leaves +the problem of indexing chunks to support readers efficiently locating +the correct chunk. + +Given the compression achieved by reftable's encoding, it does not seem +necessary to add the complexity of bzip/gzip/zlib. + +Michael Haggerty's alternate format +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Michael Haggerty proposed +link:https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAMy9T_HCnyc1g8XWOOWhe7nN0aEFyyBskV2aOMb_fe%2BwGvEJ7A%40mail.gmail.com/[an +alternate] format to reftable on the Git mailing list. This format uses +smaller chunks, without the restart table, and avoids block alignment +with padding. Reflog entries immediately follow each ref, and are thus +interleaved between refs. + +Performance testing indicates reftable is faster for lookups (51% +faster, 11.2 usec vs. 5.4 usec), although reftable produces a slightly +larger file (+ ~3.2%, 28.3M vs 29.2M): + +[cols=">,>,>,>",options="header",] +|===================================== +|format |size |seek cold |seek hot +|mh-alt |28.3 M |23.4 usec |11.2 usec +|reftable |29.2 M |19.9 usec |5.4 usec +|===================================== + +JGit Ketch RefTree +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/jgit-dev/msg03073.html[JGit Ketch] +proposed +link:https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAJo%3DhJvnAPNAdDcAAwAvU9C4RVeQdoS3Ev9WTguHx4fD0V_nOg%40mail.gmail.com/[RefTree], +an encoding of references inside Git tree objects stored as part of the +repository's object database. + +The RefTree format adds additional load on the object database storage +layer (more loose objects, more objects in packs), and relies heavily on +the packer's delta compression to save space. Namespaces which are flat +(e.g. thousands of tags in refs/tags) initially create very large loose +objects, and so RefTree does not address the problem of copying many +references to modify a handful. + +Flat namespaces are not efficiently searchable in RefTree, as tree +objects in canonical formatting cannot be binary searched. This fails +the need to handle a large number of references in a single namespace, +such as GitHub's `refs/pulls`, or a project with many tags. + +LMDB +^^^^ + +David Turner proposed +https://lore.kernel.org/git/1455772670-21142-26-git-send-email-dturner@twopensource.com/[using +LMDB], as LMDB is lightweight (64k of runtime code) and GPL-compatible +license. + +A downside of LMDB is its reliance on a single C implementation. This +makes embedding inside JGit (a popular reimplementation of Git) +difficult, and hoisting onto virtual storage (for JGit DFS) virtually +impossible. + +A common format that can be supported by all major Git implementations +(git-core, JGit, libgit2) is strongly preferred. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/remembering-renames.txt b/Documentation/technical/remembering-renames.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1e34d91 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/remembering-renames.txt @@ -0,0 +1,671 @@ +Rebases and cherry-picks involve a sequence of merges whose results are +recorded as new single-parent commits. The first parent side of those +merges represent the "upstream" side, and often include a far larger set of +changes than the second parent side. Traditionally, the renames on the +first-parent side of that sequence of merges were repeatedly re-detected +for every merge. This file explains why it is safe and effective during +rebases and cherry-picks to remember renames on the upstream side of +history as an optimization, assuming all merges are automatic and clean +(i.e. no conflicts and not interrupted for user input or editing). + +Outline: + + 0. Assumptions + + 1. How rebasing and cherry-picking work + + 2. Why the renames on MERGE_SIDE1 in any given pick are *always* a + superset of the renames on MERGE_SIDE1 for the next pick. + + 3. Why any rename on MERGE_SIDE1 in any given pick is _almost_ always also + a rename on MERGE_SIDE1 for the next pick + + 4. A detailed description of the counter-examples to #3. + + 5. Why the special cases in #4 are still fully reasonable to use to pair + up files for three-way content merging in the merge machinery, and why + they do not affect the correctness of the merge. + + 6. Interaction with skipping of "irrelevant" renames + + 7. Additional items that need to be cached + + 8. How directory rename detection interacts with the above and why this + optimization is still safe even if merge.directoryRenames is set to + "true". + + +=== 0. Assumptions === + +There are two assumptions that will hold throughout this document: + + * The upstream side where commits are transplanted to is treated as the + first parent side when rebase/cherry-pick call the merge machinery + + * All merges are fully automatic + +and a third that will hold in sections 2-5 for simplicity, that I'll later +address in section 8: + + * No directory renames occur + + +Let me explain more about each assumption and why I include it: + + +The first assumption is merely for the purposes of making this document +clearer; the optimization implementation does not actually depend upon it. +However, the assumption does hold in all cases because it reflects the way +that both rebase and cherry-pick were implemented; and the implementation +of cherry-pick and rebase are not readily changeable for backwards +compatibility reasons (see for example the discussion of the --ours and +--theirs flag in the documentation of `git checkout`, particularly the +comments about how they behave with rebase). The optimization avoids +checking first-parent-ness, though. It checks the conditions that make the +optimization valid instead, so it would still continue working if someone +changed the parent ordering that cherry-pick and rebase use. But making +this assumption does make this document much clearer and prevents me from +having to repeat every example twice. + +If the second assumption is violated, then the optimization simply is +turned off and thus isn't relevant to consider. The second assumption can +also be stated as "there is no interruption for a user to resolve conflicts +or to just further edit or tweak files". While real rebases and +cherry-picks are often interrupted (either because it's an interactive +rebase where the user requested to stop and edit, or because there were +conflicts that the user needs to resolve), the cache of renames is not +stored on disk, and thus is thrown away as soon as the rebase or cherry +pick stops for the user to resolve the operation. + +The third assumption makes sections 2-5 simpler, and allows people to +understand the basics of why this optimization is safe and effective, and +then I can go back and address the specifics in section 8. It is probably +also worth noting that if directory renames do occur, then the default of +merge.directoryRenames being set to "conflict" means that the operation +will stop for users to resolve the conflicts and the cache will be thrown +away, and thus that there won't be an optimization to apply. So, the only +reason we need to address directory renames specifically, is that some +users will have set merge.directoryRenames to "true" to allow the merges to +continue to proceed automatically. The optimization is still safe with +this config setting, but we have to discuss a few more cases to show why; +this discussion is deferred until section 8. + + +=== 1. How rebasing and cherry-picking work === + +Consider the following setup (from the git-rebase manpage): + + A---B---C topic + / + D---E---F---G main + +After rebasing or cherry-picking topic onto main, this will appear as: + + A'--B'--C' topic + / + D---E---F---G main + +The way the commits A', B', and C' are created is through a series of +merges, where rebase or cherry-pick sequentially uses each of the three +A-B-C commits in a special merge operation. Let's label the three commits +in the merge operation as MERGE_BASE, MERGE_SIDE1, and MERGE_SIDE2. For +this picture, the three commits for each of the three merges would be: + +To create A': + MERGE_BASE: E + MERGE_SIDE1: G + MERGE_SIDE2: A + +To create B': + MERGE_BASE: A + MERGE_SIDE1: A' + MERGE_SIDE2: B + +To create C': + MERGE_BASE: B + MERGE_SIDE1: B' + MERGE_SIDE2: C + +Sometimes, folks are surprised that these three-way merges are done. It +can be useful in understanding these three-way merges to view them in a +slightly different light. For example, in creating C', you can view it as +either: + + * Apply the changes between B & C to B' + * Apply the changes between B & B' to C + +Conceptually the two statements above are the same as a three-way merge of +B, B', and C, at least the parts before you decide to record a commit. + + +=== 2. Why the renames on MERGE_SIDE1 in any given pick are always a === +=== superset of the renames on MERGE_SIDE1 for the next pick. === + +The merge machinery uses the filenames it is fed from MERGE_BASE, +MERGE_SIDE1, and MERGE_SIDE2. It will only move content to a different +filename under one of three conditions: + + * To make both pieces of a conflict available to a user during conflict + resolution (examples: directory/file conflict, add/add type conflict + such as symlink vs. regular file) + + * When MERGE_SIDE1 renames the file. + + * When MERGE_SIDE2 renames the file. + +First, let's remember what commits are involved in the first and second +picks of the cherry-pick or rebase sequence: + +To create A': + MERGE_BASE: E + MERGE_SIDE1: G + MERGE_SIDE2: A + +To create B': + MERGE_BASE: A + MERGE_SIDE1: A' + MERGE_SIDE2: B + +So, in particular, we need to show that the renames between E and G are a +superset of those between A and A'. + +A' is created by the first merge. A' will only have renames for one of the +three reasons listed above. The first case, a conflict, results in a +situation where the cache is dropped and thus this optimization doesn't +take effect, so we need not consider that case. The third case, a rename +on MERGE_SIDE2 (i.e. from G to A), will show up in A' but it also shows up +in A -- therefore when diffing A and A' that path does not show up as a +rename. The only remaining way for renames to show up in A' is for the +rename to come from MERGE_SIDE1. Therefore, all renames between A and A' +are a subset of those between E and G. Equivalently, all renames between E +and G are a superset of those between A and A'. + + +=== 3. Why any rename on MERGE_SIDE1 in any given pick is _almost_ === +=== always also a rename on MERGE_SIDE1 for the next pick. === + +Let's again look at the first two picks: + +To create A': + MERGE_BASE: E + MERGE_SIDE1: G + MERGE_SIDE2: A + +To create B': + MERGE_BASE: A + MERGE_SIDE1: A' + MERGE_SIDE2: B + +Now let's look at any given rename from MERGE_SIDE1 of the first pick, i.e. +any given rename from E to G. Let's use the filenames 'oldfile' and +'newfile' for demonstration purposes. That first pick will function as +follows; when the rename is detected, the merge machinery will do a +three-way content merge of the following: + E:oldfile + G:newfile + A:oldfile +and produce a new result: + A':newfile + +Note above that I've assumed that E->A did not rename oldfile. If that +side did rename, then we most likely have a rename/rename(1to2) conflict +that will cause the rebase or cherry-pick operation to halt and drop the +in-memory cache of renames and thus doesn't need to be considered further. +In the special case that E->A does rename the file but also renames it to +newfile, then there is no conflict from the renaming and the merge can +succeed. In this special case, the rename is not valid to cache because +the second merge will find A:newfile in the MERGE_BASE (see also the new +testcases in t6429 with "rename same file identically" in their +description). So a rename/rename(1to1) needs to be specially handled by +pruning renames from the cache and decrementing the dir_rename_counts in +the current and leading directories associated with those renames. Or, +since these are really rare, one could just take the easy way out and +disable the remembering renames optimization when a rename/rename(1to1) +happens. + +The previous paragraph handled the cases for E->A renaming oldfile, let's +continue assuming that oldfile is not renamed in A. + +As per the diagram for creating B', MERGE_SIDE1 involves the changes from A +to A'. So, we are curious whether A:oldfile and A':newfile will be viewed +as renames. Note that: + + * There will be no A':oldfile (because there could not have been a + G:oldfile as we do not do break detection in the merge machinery and + G:newfile was detected as a rename, and by the construction of the + rename above that merged cleanly, the merge machinery will ensure there + is no 'oldfile' in the result). + + * There will be no A:newfile (if there had been, we would have had a + rename/add conflict). + + * Clearly A:oldfile and A':newfile are "related" (A':newfile came from a + clean three-way content merge involving A:oldfile). + +We can also expound on the third point above, by noting that three-way +content merges can also be viewed as applying the differences between the +base and one side to the other side. Thus we can view A':newfile as +having been created by taking the changes between E:oldfile and G:newfile +(which were detected as being related, i.e. <50% changed) to A:oldfile. + +Thus A:oldfile and A':newfile are just as related as E:oldfile and +G:newfile are -- they have exactly identical differences. Since the latter +were detected as renames, A:oldfile and A':newfile should also be +detectable as renames almost always. + + +=== 4. A detailed description of the counter-examples to #3. === + +We already noted in section 3 that rename/rename(1to1) (i.e. both sides +renaming a file the same way) was one counter-example. The more +interesting bit, though, is why did we need to use the "almost" qualifier +when stating that A:oldfile and A':newfile are "almost" always detectable +as renames? + +Let's repeat an earlier point that section 3 made: + + A':newfile was created by applying the changes between E:oldfile and + G:newfile to A:oldfile. The changes between E:oldfile and G:newfile were + <50% of the size of E:oldfile. + +If those changes that were <50% of the size of E:oldfile are also <50% of +the size of A:oldfile, then A:oldfile and A':newfile will be detectable as +renames. However, if there is a dramatic size reduction between E:oldfile +and A:oldfile (but the changes between E:oldfile, G:newfile, and A:oldfile +still somehow merge cleanly), then traditional rename detection would not +detect A:oldfile and A':newfile as renames. + +Here's an example where that can happen: + * E:oldfile had 20 lines + * G:newfile added 10 new lines at the beginning of the file + * A:oldfile kept the first 3 lines of the file, and deleted all the rest +then + => A':newfile would have 13 lines, 3 of which matches those in A:oldfile. +E:oldfile -> G:newfile would be detected as a rename, but A:oldfile and +A':newfile would not be. + + +=== 5. Why the special cases in #4 are still fully reasonable to use to === +=== pair up files for three-way content merging in the merge machinery, === +=== and why they do not affect the correctness of the merge. === + +In the rename/rename(1to1) case, A:newfile and A':newfile are not renames +since they use the *same* filename. However, files with the same filename +are obviously fine to pair up for three-way content merging (the merge +machinery has never employed break detection). The interesting +counter-example case is thus not the rename/rename(1to1) case, but the case +where A did not rename oldfile. That was the case that we spent most of +the time discussing in sections 3 and 4. The remainder of this section +will be devoted to that case as well. + +So, even if A:oldfile and A':newfile aren't detectable as renames, why is +it still reasonable to pair them up for three-way content merging in the +merge machinery? There are multiple reasons: + + * As noted in sections 3 and 4, the diff between A:oldfile and A':newfile + is *exactly* the same as the diff between E:oldfile and G:newfile. The + latter pair were detected as renames, so it seems unlikely to surprise + users for us to treat A:oldfile and A':newfile as renames. + + * In fact, "oldfile" and "newfile" were at one point detected as renames + due to how they were constructed in the E..G chain. And we used that + information once already in this rebase/cherry-pick. I think users + would be unlikely to be surprised at us continuing to treat the files + as renames and would quickly understand why we had done so. + + * Marking or declaring files as renames is *not* the end goal for merges. + Merges use renames to determine which files make sense to be paired up + for three-way content merges. + + * A:oldfile and A':newfile were _already_ paired up in a three-way + content merge; that is how A':newfile was created. In fact, that + three-way content merge was clean. So using them again in a later + three-way content merge seems very reasonable. + +However, the above is focusing on the common scenarios. Let's try to look +at all possible unusual scenarios and compare without the optimization to +with the optimization. Consider the following theoretical cases; we will +then dive into each to determine which of them are possible, +and if so, what they mean: + + 1. Without the optimization, the second merge results in a conflict. + With the optimization, the second merge also results in a conflict. + Questions: Are the conflicts confusingly different? Better in one case? + + 2. Without the optimization, the second merge results in NO conflict. + With the optimization, the second merge also results in NO conflict. + Questions: Are the merges the same? + + 3. Without the optimization, the second merge results in a conflict. + With the optimization, the second merge results in NO conflict. + Questions: Possible? Bug, bugfix, or something else? + + 4. Without the optimization, the second merge results in NO conflict. + With the optimization, the second merge results in a conflict. + Questions: Possible? Bug, bugfix, or something else? + +I'll consider all four cases, but out of order. + +The fourth case is impossible. For the code without the remembering +renames optimization to not get a conflict, B:oldfile would need to exactly +match A:oldfile -- if it doesn't, there would be a modify/delete conflict. +If A:oldfile matches B:oldfile exactly, then a three-way content merge +between A:oldfile, A':newfile, and B:oldfile would have no conflict and +just give us the version of newfile from A' as the result. + +From the same logic as the above paragraph, the second case would indeed +result in identical merges. When A:oldfile exactly matches B:oldfile, an +undetected rename would say, "Oh, I see one side didn't modify 'oldfile' +and the other side deleted it. I'll delete it. And I see you have this +brand new file named 'newfile' in A', so I'll keep it." That gives the +same results as three-way content merging A:oldfile, A':newfile, and +B:oldfile -- a removal of oldfile with the version of newfile from A' +showing up in the result. + +The third case is interesting. It means that A:oldfile and A':newfile were +not just similar enough, but that the changes between them did not conflict +with the changes between A:oldfile and B:oldfile. This would validate our +hunch that the files were similar enough to be used in a three-way content +merge, and thus seems entirely correct for us to have used them that way. +(Sidenote: One particular example here may be enlightening. Let's say that +B was an immediate revert of A. B clearly would have been a clean revert +of A, since A was B's immediate parent. One would assume that if you can +pick a commit, you should also be able to cherry-pick its immediate revert. +However, this is one of those funny corner cases; without this +optimization, we just successfully picked a commit cleanly, but we are +unable to cherry-pick its immediate revert due to the size differences +between E:oldfile and A:oldfile.) + +That leaves only the first case to consider -- when we get conflicts both +with or without the optimization. Without the optimization, we'll have a +modify/delete conflict, where both A':newfile and B:oldfile are left in the +tree for the user to deal with and no hints about the potential similarity +between the two. With the optimization, we'll have a three-way content +merged A:oldfile, A':newfile, and B:oldfile with conflict markers +suggesting we thought the files were related but giving the user the chance +to resolve. As noted above, I don't think users will find us treating +'oldfile' and 'newfile' as related as a surprise since they were between E +and G. In any event, though, this case shouldn't be concerning since we +hit a conflict in both cases, told the user what we know, and asked them to +resolve it. + +So, in summary, case 4 is impossible, case 2 yields the same behavior, and +cases 1 and 3 seem to provide as good or better behavior with the +optimization than without. + + +=== 6. Interaction with skipping of "irrelevant" renames === + +Previous optimizations involved skipping rename detection for paths +considered to be "irrelevant". See for example the following commits: + + * 32a56dfb99 ("merge-ort: precompute subset of sources for which we + need rename detection", 2021-03-11) + * 2fd9eda462 ("merge-ort: precompute whether directory rename + detection is needed", 2021-03-11) + * 9bd342137e ("diffcore-rename: determine which relevant_sources are + no longer relevant", 2021-03-13) + +Relevance is always determined by what the _other_ side of history has +done, in terms of modifying a file that our side renamed, or adding a +file to a directory which our side renamed. This means that a path +that is "irrelevant" when picking the first commit of a series in a +rebase or cherry-pick, may suddenly become "relevant" when picking the +next commit. + +The upshot of this is that we can only cache rename detection results +for relevant paths, and need to re-check relevance in subsequent +commits. If those subsequent commits have additional paths that are +relevant for rename detection, then we will need to redo rename +detection -- though we can limit it to the paths for which we have not +already detected renames. + + +=== 7. Additional items that need to be cached === + +It turns out we have to cache more than just renames; we also cache: + + A) non-renames (i.e. unpaired deletes) + B) counts of renames within directories + C) sources that were marked as RELEVANT_LOCATION, but which were + downgraded to RELEVANT_NO_MORE + D) the toplevel trees involved in the merge + +These are all stored in struct rename_info, and respectively appear in + * cached_pairs (along side actual renames, just with a value of NULL) + * dir_rename_counts + * cached_irrelevant + * merge_trees + +The reason for (A) comes from the irrelevant renames skipping +optimization discussed in section 6. The fact that irrelevant renames +are skipped means we only get a subset of the potential renames +detected and subsequent commits may need to run rename detection on +the upstream side on a subset of the remaining renames (to get the +renames that are relevant for that later commit). Since unpaired +deletes are involved in rename detection too, we don't want to +repeatedly check that those paths remain unpaired on the upstream side +with every commit we are transplanting. + +The reason for (B) is that diffcore_rename_extended() is what +generates the counts of renames by directory which is needed in +directory rename detection, and if we don't run +diffcore_rename_extended() again then we need to have the output from +it, including dir_rename_counts, from the previous run. + +The reason for (C) is that merge-ort's tree traversal will again think +those paths are relevant (marking them as RELEVANT_LOCATION), but the +fact that they were downgraded to RELEVANT_NO_MORE means that +dir_rename_counts already has the information we need for directory +rename detection. (A path which becomes RELEVANT_CONTENT in a +subsequent commit will be removed from cached_irrelevant.) + +The reason for (D) is that is how we determine whether the remember +renames optimization can be used. In particular, remembering that our +sequence of merges looks like: + + Merge 1: + MERGE_BASE: E + MERGE_SIDE1: G + MERGE_SIDE2: A + => Creates A' + + Merge 2: + MERGE_BASE: A + MERGE_SIDE1: A' + MERGE_SIDE2: B + => Creates B' + +It is the fact that the trees A and A' appear both in Merge 1 and in +Merge 2, with A as a parent of A' that allows this optimization. So +we store the trees to compare with what we are asked to merge next +time. + + +=== 8. How directory rename detection interacts with the above and === +=== why this optimization is still safe even if === +=== merge.directoryRenames is set to "true". === + +As noted in the assumptions section: + + """ + ...if directory renames do occur, then the default of + merge.directoryRenames being set to "conflict" means that the operation + will stop for users to resolve the conflicts and the cache will be + thrown away, and thus that there won't be an optimization to apply. + So, the only reason we need to address directory renames specifically, + is that some users will have set merge.directoryRenames to "true" to + allow the merges to continue to proceed automatically. + """ + +Let's remember that we need to look at how any given pick affects the next +one. So let's again use the first two picks from the diagram in section +one: + + First pick does this three-way merge: + MERGE_BASE: E + MERGE_SIDE1: G + MERGE_SIDE2: A + => creates A' + + Second pick does this three-way merge: + MERGE_BASE: A + MERGE_SIDE1: A' + MERGE_SIDE2: B + => creates B' + +Now, directory rename detection exists so that if one side of history +renames a directory, and the other side adds a new file to the old +directory, then the merge (with merge.directoryRenames=true) can move the +file into the new directory. There are two qualitatively different ways to +add a new file to an old directory: create a new file, or rename a file +into that directory. Also, directory renames can be done on either side of +history, so there are four cases to consider: + + * MERGE_SIDE1 renames old dir, MERGE_SIDE2 adds new file to old dir + * MERGE_SIDE1 renames old dir, MERGE_SIDE2 renames file into old dir + * MERGE_SIDE1 adds new file to old dir, MERGE_SIDE2 renames old dir + * MERGE_SIDE1 renames file into old dir, MERGE_SIDE2 renames old dir + +One last note before we consider these four cases: There are some +important properties about how we implement this optimization with +respect to directory rename detection that we need to bear in mind +while considering all of these cases: + + * rename caching occurs *after* applying directory renames + + * a rename created by directory rename detection is recorded for the side + of history that did the directory rename. + + * dir_rename_counts, the nested map of + {oldname => {newname => count}}, + is cached between runs as well. This basically means that directory + rename detection is also cached, though only on the side of history + that we cache renames for (MERGE_SIDE1 as far as this document is + concerned; see the assumptions section). Two interesting sub-notes + about these counts: + + * If we need to perform rename-detection again on the given side (e.g. + some paths are relevant for rename detection that weren't before), + then we clear dir_rename_counts and recompute it, making use of + cached_pairs. The reason it is important to do this is optimizations + around RELEVANT_LOCATION exist to prevent us from computing + unnecessary renames for directory rename detection and from computing + dir_rename_counts for irrelevant directories; but those same renames + or directories may become necessary for subsequent merges. The + easiest way to "fix up" dir_rename_counts in such cases is to just + recompute it. + + * If we prune rename/rename(1to1) entries from the cache, then we also + need to update dir_rename_counts to decrement the counts for the + involved directory and any relevant parent directories (to undo what + update_dir_rename_counts() in diffcore-rename.c incremented when the + rename was initially found). If we instead just disable the + remembering renames optimization when the exceedingly rare + rename/rename(1to1) cases occur, then dir_rename_counts will get + re-computed the next time rename detection occurs, as noted above. + + * the side with multiple commits to pick, is the side of history that we + do NOT cache renames for. Thus, there are no additional commits to + change the number of renames in a directory, except for those done by + directory rename detection (which always pad the majority). + + * the "renames" we cache are modified slightly by any directory rename, + as noted below. + +Now, with those notes out of the way, let's go through the four cases +in order: + +Case 1: MERGE_SIDE1 renames old dir, MERGE_SIDE2 adds new file to old dir + + This case looks like this: + + MERGE_BASE: E, Has olddir/ + MERGE_SIDE1: G, Renames olddir/ -> newdir/ + MERGE_SIDE2: A, Adds olddir/newfile + => creates A', With newdir/newfile + + MERGE_BASE: A, Has olddir/newfile + MERGE_SIDE1: A', Has newdir/newfile + MERGE_SIDE2: B, Modifies olddir/newfile + => expected B', with threeway-merged newdir/newfile from above + + In this case, with the optimization, note that after the first commit: + * MERGE_SIDE1 remembers olddir/ -> newdir/ + * MERGE_SIDE1 has cached olddir/newfile -> newdir/newfile + Given the cached rename noted above, the second merge can proceed as + expected without needing to perform rename detection from A -> A'. + +Case 2: MERGE_SIDE1 renames old dir, MERGE_SIDE2 renames file into old dir + + This case looks like this: + MERGE_BASE: E oldfile, olddir/ + MERGE_SIDE1: G oldfile, olddir/ -> newdir/ + MERGE_SIDE2: A oldfile -> olddir/newfile + => creates A', With newdir/newfile representing original oldfile + + MERGE_BASE: A olddir/newfile + MERGE_SIDE1: A' newdir/newfile + MERGE_SIDE2: B modify olddir/newfile + => expected B', with threeway-merged newdir/newfile from above + + In this case, with the optimization, note that after the first commit: + * MERGE_SIDE1 remembers olddir/ -> newdir/ + * MERGE_SIDE1 has cached olddir/newfile -> newdir/newfile + (NOT oldfile -> newdir/newfile; compare to case with + (p->status == 'R' && new_path) in possibly_cache_new_pair()) + + Given the cached rename noted above, the second merge can proceed as + expected without needing to perform rename detection from A -> A'. + +Case 3: MERGE_SIDE1 adds new file to old dir, MERGE_SIDE2 renames old dir + + This case looks like this: + + MERGE_BASE: E, Has olddir/ + MERGE_SIDE1: G, Adds olddir/newfile + MERGE_SIDE2: A, Renames olddir/ -> newdir/ + => creates A', With newdir/newfile + + MERGE_BASE: A, Has newdir/, but no notion of newdir/newfile + MERGE_SIDE1: A', Has newdir/newfile + MERGE_SIDE2: B, Has newdir/, but no notion of newdir/newfile + => expected B', with newdir/newfile from A' + + In this case, with the optimization, note that after the first commit there + were no renames on MERGE_SIDE1, and any renames on MERGE_SIDE2 are tossed. + But the second merge didn't need any renames so this is fine. + +Case 4: MERGE_SIDE1 renames file into old dir, MERGE_SIDE2 renames old dir + + This case looks like this: + + MERGE_BASE: E, Has olddir/ + MERGE_SIDE1: G, Renames oldfile -> olddir/newfile + MERGE_SIDE2: A, Renames olddir/ -> newdir/ + => creates A', With newdir/newfile representing original oldfile + + MERGE_BASE: A, Has oldfile + MERGE_SIDE1: A', Has newdir/newfile + MERGE_SIDE2: B, Modifies oldfile + => expected B', with threeway-merged newdir/newfile from above + + In this case, with the optimization, note that after the first commit: + * MERGE_SIDE1 remembers oldfile -> newdir/newfile + (NOT oldfile -> olddir/newfile; compare to case of second + block under p->status == 'R' in possibly_cache_new_pair()) + * MERGE_SIDE2 renames are tossed because only MERGE_SIDE1 is remembered + + Given the cached rename noted above, the second merge can proceed as + expected without needing to perform rename detection from A -> A'. + +Finally, I'll just note here that interactions with the +skip-irrelevant-renames optimization means we sometimes don't detect +renames for any files within a directory that was renamed, in which +case we will not have been able to detect any rename for the directory +itself. In such a case, we do not know whether the directory was +renamed; we want to be careful to avoid cacheing some kind of "this +directory was not renamed" statement. If we did, then a subsequent +commit being rebased could add a file to the old directory, and the +user would expect it to end up in the correct directory -- something +our erroneous "this directory was not renamed" cache would preclude. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/repository-version.txt b/Documentation/technical/repository-version.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8ef664b --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/repository-version.txt @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +== Git Repository Format Versions + +Every git repository is marked with a numeric version in the +`core.repositoryformatversion` key of its `config` file. This version +specifies the rules for operating on the on-disk repository data. An +implementation of git which does not understand a particular version +advertised by an on-disk repository MUST NOT operate on that repository; +doing so risks not only producing wrong results, but actually losing +data. + +Because of this rule, version bumps should be kept to an absolute +minimum. Instead, we generally prefer these strategies: + + - bumping format version numbers of individual data files (e.g., + index, packfiles, etc). This restricts the incompatibilities only to + those files. + + - introducing new data that gracefully degrades when used by older + clients (e.g., pack bitmap files are ignored by older clients, which + simply do not take advantage of the optimization they provide). + +A whole-repository format version bump should only be part of a change +that cannot be independently versioned. For instance, if one were to +change the reachability rules for objects, or the rules for locking +refs, that would require a bump of the repository format version. + +Note that this applies only to accessing the repository's disk contents +directly. An older client which understands only format `0` may still +connect via `git://` to a repository using format `1`, as long as the +server process understands format `1`. + +The preferred strategy for rolling out a version bump (whether whole +repository or for a single file) is to teach git to read the new format, +and allow writing the new format with a config switch or command line +option (for experimentation or for those who do not care about backwards +compatibility with older gits). Then after a long period to allow the +reading capability to become common, we may switch to writing the new +format by default. + +The currently defined format versions are: + +=== Version `0` + +This is the format defined by the initial version of git, including but +not limited to the format of the repository directory, the repository +configuration file, and the object and ref storage. Specifying the +complete behavior of git is beyond the scope of this document. + +=== Version `1` + +This format is identical to version `0`, with the following exceptions: + + 1. When reading the `core.repositoryformatversion` variable, a git + implementation which supports version 1 MUST also read any + configuration keys found in the `extensions` section of the + configuration file. + + 2. If a version-1 repository specifies any `extensions.*` keys that + the running git has not implemented, the operation MUST NOT + proceed. Similarly, if the value of any known key is not understood + by the implementation, the operation MUST NOT proceed. + +Note that if no extensions are specified in the config file, then +`core.repositoryformatversion` SHOULD be set to `0` (setting it to `1` +provides no benefit, and makes the repository incompatible with older +implementations of git). + +This document will serve as the master list for extensions. Any +implementation wishing to define a new extension should make a note of +it here, in order to claim the name. + +The defined extensions are: + +==== `noop` + +This extension does not change git's behavior at all. It is useful only +for testing format-1 compatibility. + +==== `preciousObjects` + +When the config key `extensions.preciousObjects` is set to `true`, +objects in the repository MUST NOT be deleted (e.g., by `git-prune` or +`git repack -d`). + +==== `partialClone` + +When the config key `extensions.partialClone` is set, it indicates +that the repo was created with a partial clone (or later performed +a partial fetch) and that the remote may have omitted sending +certain unwanted objects. Such a remote is called a "promisor remote" +and it promises that all such omitted objects can be fetched from it +in the future. + +The value of this key is the name of the promisor remote. + +==== `worktreeConfig` + +If set, by default "git config" reads from both "config" and +"config.worktree" file from GIT_DIR in that order. In +multiple working directory mode, "config" file is shared while +"config.worktree" is per-working directory (i.e., it's in +GIT_COMMON_DIR/worktrees/<id>/config.worktree) diff --git a/Documentation/technical/rerere.txt b/Documentation/technical/rerere.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..35d4541 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/rerere.txt @@ -0,0 +1,186 @@ +Rerere +====== + +This document describes the rerere logic. + +Conflict normalization +---------------------- + +To ensure recorded conflict resolutions can be looked up in the rerere +database, even when branches are merged in a different order, +different branches are merged that result in the same conflict, or +when different conflict style settings are used, rerere normalizes the +conflicts before writing them to the rerere database. + +Different conflict styles and branch names are normalized by stripping +the labels from the conflict markers, and removing the common ancestor +version from the `diff3` or `zdiff3` conflict styles. Branches that +are merged in different order are normalized by sorting the conflict +hunks. More on each of those steps in the following sections. + +Once these two normalization operations are applied, a conflict ID is +calculated based on the normalized conflict, which is later used by +rerere to look up the conflict in the rerere database. + +Removing the common ancestor version +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Say we have three branches AB, AC and AC2. The common ancestor of +these branches has a file with a line containing the string "A" (for +brevity this is called "line A" in the rest of the document). In +branch AB this line is changed to "B", in AC, this line is changed to +"C", and branch AC2 is forked off of AC, after the line was changed to +"C". + +Forking a branch ABAC off of branch AB and then merging AC into it, we +get a conflict like the following: + + <<<<<<< HEAD + B + ======= + C + >>>>>>> AC + +Doing the analogous with AC2 (forking a branch ABAC2 off of branch AB +and then merging branch AC2 into it), using the diff3 or zdiff3 +conflict style, we get a conflict like the following: + + <<<<<<< HEAD + B + ||||||| merged common ancestors + A + ======= + C + >>>>>>> AC2 + +By resolving this conflict, to leave line D, the user declares: + + After examining what branches AB and AC did, I believe that making + line A into line D is the best thing to do that is compatible with + what AB and AC wanted to do. + +As branch AC2 refers to the same commit as AC, the above implies that +this is also compatible what AB and AC2 wanted to do. + +By extension, this means that rerere should recognize that the above +conflicts are the same. To do this, the labels on the conflict +markers are stripped, and the common ancestor version is removed. The above +examples would both result in the following normalized conflict: + + <<<<<<< + B + ======= + C + >>>>>>> + +Sorting hunks +~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +As before, lets imagine that a common ancestor had a file with line A +its early part, and line X in its late part. And then four branches +are forked that do these things: + + - AB: changes A to B + - AC: changes A to C + - XY: changes X to Y + - XZ: changes X to Z + +Now, forking a branch ABAC off of branch AB and then merging AC into +it, and forking a branch ACAB off of branch AC and then merging AB +into it, would yield the conflict in a different order. The former +would say "A became B or C, what now?" while the latter would say "A +became C or B, what now?" + +As a reminder, the act of merging AC into ABAC and resolving the +conflict to leave line D means that the user declares: + + After examining what branches AB and AC did, I believe that + making line A into line D is the best thing to do that is + compatible with what AB and AC wanted to do. + +So the conflict we would see when merging AB into ACAB should be +resolved the same way---it is the resolution that is in line with that +declaration. + +Imagine that similarly previously a branch XYXZ was forked from XY, +and XZ was merged into it, and resolved "X became Y or Z" into "X +became W". + +Now, if a branch ABXY was forked from AB and then merged XY, then ABXY +would have line B in its early part and line Y in its later part. +Such a merge would be quite clean. We can construct 4 combinations +using these four branches ((AB, AC) x (XY, XZ)). + +Merging ABXY and ACXZ would make "an early A became B or C, a late X +became Y or Z" conflict, while merging ACXY and ABXZ would make "an +early A became C or B, a late X became Y or Z". We can see there are +4 combinations of ("B or C", "C or B") x ("X or Y", "Y or X"). + +By sorting, the conflict is given its canonical name, namely, "an +early part became B or C, a late part became X or Y", and whenever +any of these four patterns appear, and we can get to the same conflict +and resolution that we saw earlier. + +Without the sorting, we'd have to somehow find a previous resolution +from combinatorial explosion. + +Conflict ID calculation +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Once the conflict normalization is done, the conflict ID is calculated +as the sha1 hash of the conflict hunks appended to each other, +separated by <NUL> characters. The conflict markers are stripped out +before the sha1 is calculated. So in the example above, where we +merge branch AC which changes line A to line C, into branch AB, which +changes line A to line C, the conflict ID would be +SHA1('B<NUL>C<NUL>'). + +If there are multiple conflicts in one file, the sha1 is calculated +the same way with all hunks appended to each other, in the order in +which they appear in the file, separated by a <NUL> character. + +Nested conflicts +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Nested conflicts are handled very similarly to "simple" conflicts. +Similar to simple conflicts, the conflict is first normalized by +stripping the labels from conflict markers, stripping the common ancestor +version, and the sorting the conflict hunks, both for the outer and the +inner conflict. This is done recursively, so any number of nested +conflicts can be handled. + +Note that this only works for conflict markers that "cleanly nest". If +there are any unmatched conflict markers, rerere will fail to handle +the conflict and record a conflict resolution. + +The only difference is in how the conflict ID is calculated. For the +inner conflict, the conflict markers themselves are not stripped out +before calculating the sha1. + +Say we have the following conflict for example: + + <<<<<<< HEAD + 1 + ======= + <<<<<<< HEAD + 3 + ======= + 2 + >>>>>>> branch-2 + >>>>>>> branch-3~ + +After stripping out the labels of the conflict markers, and sorting +the hunks, the conflict would look as follows: + + <<<<<<< + 1 + ======= + <<<<<<< + 2 + ======= + 3 + >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + +and finally the conflict ID would be calculated as: +`sha1('1<NUL><<<<<<<\n3\n=======\n2\n>>>>>>><NUL>')` diff --git a/Documentation/technical/scalar.txt b/Documentation/technical/scalar.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..921cb10 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/scalar.txt @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +Scalar +====== + +Scalar is a repository management tool that optimizes Git for use in large +repositories. It accomplishes this by helping users to take advantage of +advanced performance features in Git. Unlike most other Git built-in commands, +Scalar is not executed as a subcommand of 'git'; rather, it is built as a +separate executable containing its own series of subcommands. + +Background +---------- + +Scalar was originally designed as an add-on to Git and implemented as a .NET +Core application. It was created based on the learnings from the VFS for Git +project (another application aimed at improving the experience of working with +large repositories). As part of its initial implementation, Scalar relied on +custom features in the Microsoft fork of Git that have since been integrated +into core Git: + +* partial clone, +* commit graphs, +* multi-pack index, +* sparse checkout (cone mode), +* scheduled background maintenance, +* etc + +With the requisite Git functionality in place and a desire to bring the benefits +of Scalar to the larger Git community, the Scalar application itself was ported +from C# to C and integrated upstream. + +Features +-------- + +Scalar is comprised of two major pieces of functionality: automatically +configuring built-in Git performance features and managing repository +enlistments. + +The Git performance features configured by Scalar (see "Background" for +examples) confer substantial performance benefits to large repositories, but are +either too experimental to enable for all of Git yet, or only benefit large +repositories. As new features are introduced, Scalar should be updated +accordingly to incorporate them. This will prevent the tool from becoming stale +while also providing a path for more easily bringing features to the appropriate +users. + +Enlistments are how Scalar knows which repositories on a user's system should +utilize Scalar-configured features. This allows it to update performance +settings when new ones are added to the tool, as well as centrally manage +repository maintenance. The enlistment structure - a root directory with a +`src/` subdirectory containing the cloned repository itself - is designed to +encourage users to route build outputs outside of the repository to avoid the +performance-limiting overhead of ignoring those files in Git. + +Design +------ + +Scalar is implemented in C and interacts with Git via a mix of child process +invocations of Git and direct usage of `libgit.a`. Internally, it is structured +much like other built-ins with subcommands (e.g., `git stash`), containing a +`cmd_<subcommand>()` function for each subcommand, routed through a `cmd_main()` +function. Most options are unique to each subcommand, with `scalar` respecting +some "global" `git` options (e.g., `-c` and `-C`). + +Because `scalar` is not invoked as a Git subcommand (like `git scalar`), it is +built and installed as its own executable in the `bin/` directory, alongside +`git`, `git-gui`, etc. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/send-pack-pipeline.txt b/Documentation/technical/send-pack-pipeline.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9b5a0bc --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/send-pack-pipeline.txt @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +Git-send-pack internals +======================= + +Overall operation +----------------- + +. Connects to the remote side and invokes git-receive-pack. + +. Learns what refs the remote has and what commit they point at. + Matches them to the refspecs we are pushing. + +. Checks if there are non-fast-forwards. Unlike fetch-pack, + the repository send-pack runs in is supposed to be a superset + of the recipient in fast-forward cases, so there is no need + for want/have exchanges, and fast-forward check can be done + locally. Tell the result to the other end. + +. Calls pack_objects() which generates a packfile and sends it + over to the other end. + +. If the remote side is new enough (v1.1.0 or later), wait for + the unpack and hook status from the other end. + +. Exit with appropriate error codes. + + +Pack_objects pipeline +--------------------- + +This function gets one file descriptor (`fd`) which is either a +socket (over the network) or a pipe (local). What's written to +this fd goes to git-receive-pack to be unpacked. + + send-pack ---> fd ---> receive-pack + +The function pack_objects creates a pipe and then forks. The +forked child execs pack-objects with --revs to receive revision +parameters from its standard input. This process will write the +packfile to the other end. + + send-pack + | + pack_objects() ---> fd ---> receive-pack + | ^ (pipe) + v | + (child) + +The child dup2's to arrange its standard output to go back to +the other end, and read its standard input to come from the +pipe. After that it exec's pack-objects. On the other hand, +the parent process, before starting to feed the child pipeline, +closes the reading side of the pipe and fd to receive-pack. + + send-pack + | + pack_objects(parent) + | + v [0] + pack-objects [0] ---> receive-pack + + +[jc: the pipeline was much more complex and needed documentation before + I understood an earlier bug, but now it is trivial and straightforward.] diff --git a/Documentation/technical/shallow.txt b/Documentation/technical/shallow.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f3738ba --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/shallow.txt @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +Shallow commits +=============== + +.Definition +********************************************************* +Shallow commits do have parents, but not in the shallow +repo, and therefore grafts are introduced pretending that +these commits have no parents. +********************************************************* + +$GIT_DIR/shallow lists commit object names and tells Git to +pretend as if they are root commits (e.g. "git log" traversal +stops after showing them; "git fsck" does not complain saying +the commits listed on their "parent" lines do not exist). + +Each line contains exactly one object name. When read, a commit_graft +will be constructed, which has nr_parent < 0 to make it easier +to discern from user provided grafts. + +Note that the shallow feature could not be changed easily to +use replace refs: a commit containing a `mergetag` is not allowed +to be replaced, not even by a root commit. Such a commit can be +made shallow, though. Also, having a `shallow` file explicitly +listing all the commits made shallow makes it a *lot* easier to +do shallow-specific things such as to deepen the history. + +Since fsck-objects relies on the library to read the objects, +it honours shallow commits automatically. + +There are some unfinished ends of the whole shallow business: + +- maybe we have to force non-thin packs when fetching into a + shallow repo (ATM they are forced non-thin). + +- A special handling of a shallow upstream is needed. At some + stage, upload-pack has to check if it sends a shallow commit, + and it should send that information early (or fail, if the + client does not support shallow repositories). There is no + support at all for this in this patch series. + +- Instead of locking $GIT_DIR/shallow at the start, just + the timestamp of it is noted, and when it comes to writing it, + a check is performed if the mtime is still the same, dying if + it is not. + +- It is unclear how "push into/from a shallow repo" should behave. + +- If you deepen a history, you'd want to get the tags of the + newly stored (but older!) commits. This does not work right now. + +To make a shallow clone, you can call "git-clone --depth 20 repo". +The result contains only commit chains with a length of at most 20. +It also writes an appropriate $GIT_DIR/shallow. + +You can deepen a shallow repository with "git-fetch --depth 20 +repo branch", which will fetch branch from repo, but stop at depth +20, updating $GIT_DIR/shallow. + +The special depth 2147483647 (or 0x7fffffff, the largest positive +number a signed 32-bit integer can contain) means infinite depth. diff --git a/Documentation/technical/sparse-checkout.txt b/Documentation/technical/sparse-checkout.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fa0d01c --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/sparse-checkout.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1103 @@ +Table of contents: + + * Terminology + * Purpose of sparse-checkouts + * Usecases of primary concern + * Oversimplified mental models ("Cliff Notes" for this document!) + * Desired behavior + * Behavior classes + * Subcommand-dependent defaults + * Sparse specification vs. sparsity patterns + * Implementation Questions + * Implementation Goals/Plans + * Known bugs + * Reference Emails + + +=== Terminology === + +cone mode: one of two modes for specifying the desired subset of files + in a sparse-checkout. In cone-mode, the user specifies + directories (getting both everything under that directory as + well as everything in leading directories), while in non-cone + mode, the user specifies gitignore-style patterns. Controlled + by the --[no-]cone option to sparse-checkout init|set. + +SKIP_WORKTREE: When tracked files do not match the sparse specification and + are removed from the working tree, the file in the index is marked + with a SKIP_WORKTREE bit. Note that if a tracked file has the + SKIP_WORKTREE bit set but the file is later written by the user to + the working tree anyway, the SKIP_WORKTREE bit will be cleared at + the beginning of any subsequent Git operation. + + Most sparse checkout users are unaware of this implementation + detail, and the term should generally be avoided in user-facing + descriptions and command flags. Unfortunately, prior to the + `sparse-checkout` subcommand this low-level detail was exposed, + and as of time of writing, is still exposed in various places. + +sparse-checkout: a subcommand in git used to reduce the files present in + the working tree to a subset of all tracked files. Also, the + name of the file in the $GIT_DIR/info directory used to track + the sparsity patterns corresponding to the user's desired + subset. + +sparse cone: see cone mode + +sparse directory: An entry in the index corresponding to a directory, which + appears in the index instead of all the files under that directory + that would normally appear. See also sparse-index. Something that + can cause confusion is that the "sparse directory" does NOT match + the sparse specification, i.e. the directory is NOT present in the + working tree. May be renamed in the future (e.g. to "skipped + directory"). + +sparse index: A special mode for sparse-checkout that also makes the + index sparse by recording a directory entry in lieu of all the + files underneath that directory (thus making that a "skipped + directory" which unfortunately has also been called a "sparse + directory"), and does this for potentially multiple + directories. Controlled by the --[no-]sparse-index option to + init|set|reapply. + +sparsity patterns: patterns from $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout used to + define the set of files of interest. A warning: It is easy to + over-use this term (or the shortened "patterns" term), for two + reasons: (1) users in cone mode specify directories rather than + patterns (their directories are transformed into patterns, but + users may think you are talking about non-cone mode if you use the + word "patterns"), and (b) the sparse specification might + transiently differ in the working tree or index from the sparsity + patterns (see "Sparse specification vs. sparsity patterns"). + +sparse specification: The set of paths in the user's area of focus. This + is typically just the tracked files that match the sparsity + patterns, but the sparse specification can temporarily differ and + include additional files. (See also "Sparse specification + vs. sparsity patterns") + + * When working with history, the sparse specification is exactly + the set of files matching the sparsity patterns. + * When interacting with the working tree, the sparse specification + is the set of tracked files with a clear SKIP_WORKTREE bit or + tracked files present in the working copy. + * When modifying or showing results from the index, the sparse + specification is the set of files with a clear SKIP_WORKTREE bit + or that differ in the index from HEAD. + * If working with the index and the working copy, the sparse + specification is the union of the paths from above. + +vivifying: When a command restores a tracked file to the working tree (and + hopefully also clears the SKIP_WORKTREE bit in the index for that + file), this is referred to as "vivifying" the file. + + +=== Purpose of sparse-checkouts === + +sparse-checkouts exist to allow users to work with a subset of their +files. + +You can think of sparse-checkouts as subdividing "tracked" files into two +categories -- a sparse subset, and all the rest. Implementationally, we +mark "all the rest" in the index with a SKIP_WORKTREE bit and leave them +out of the working tree. The SKIP_WORKTREE files are still tracked, just +not present in the working tree. + +In the past, sparse-checkouts were defined by "SKIP_WORKTREE means the file +is missing from the working tree but pretend the file contents match HEAD". +That was not only bogus (it actually meant the file missing from the +working tree matched the index rather than HEAD), but it was also a +low-level detail which only provided decent behavior for a few commands. +There were a surprising number of ways in which that guiding principle gave +command results that violated user expectations, and as such was a bad +mental model. However, it persisted for many years and may still be found +in some corners of the code base. + +Anyway, the idea of "working with a subset of files" is simple enough, but +there are multiple different high-level usecases which affect how some Git +subcommands should behave. Further, even if we only considered one of +those usecases, sparse-checkouts can modify different subcommands in over a +half dozen different ways. Let's start by considering the high level +usecases: + + A) Users are _only_ interested in the sparse portion of the repo + + A*) Users are _only_ interested in the sparse portion of the repo + that they have downloaded so far + + B) Users want a sparse working tree, but are working in a larger whole + + C) sparse-checkout is a behind-the-scenes implementation detail allowing + Git to work with a specially crafted in-house virtual file system; + users are actually working with a "full" working tree that is + lazily populated, and sparse-checkout helps with the lazy population + piece. + +It may be worth explaining each of these in a bit more detail: + + + (Behavior A) Users are _only_ interested in the sparse portion of the repo + +These folks might know there are other things in the repository, but +don't care. They are uninterested in other parts of the repository, and +only want to know about changes within their area of interest. Showing +them other files from history (e.g. from diff/log/grep/etc.) is a +usability annoyance, potentially a huge one since other changes in +history may dwarf the changes they are interested in. + +Some of these users also arrive at this usecase from wanting to use partial +clones together with sparse checkouts (in a way where they have downloaded +blobs within the sparse specification) and do disconnected development. +Not only do these users generally not care about other parts of the +repository, but consider it a blocker for Git commands to try to operate on +those. If commands attempt to access paths in history outside the sparsity +specification, then the partial clone will attempt to download additional +blobs on demand, fail, and then fail the user's command. (This may be +unavoidable in some cases, e.g. when `git merge` has non-trivial changes to +reconcile outside the sparse specification, but we should limit how often +users are forced to connect to the network.) + +Also, even for users using partial clones that do not mind being +always connected to the network, the need to download blobs as +side-effects of various other commands (such as the printed diffstat +after a merge or pull) can lead to worries about local repository size +growing unnecessarily[10]. + + (Behavior A*) Users are _only_ interested in the sparse portion of the repo + that they have downloaded so far (a variant on the first usecase) + +This variant is driven by folks who using partial clones together with +sparse checkouts and do disconnected development (so far sounding like a +subset of behavior A users) and doing so on very large repositories. The +reason for yet another variant is that downloading even just the blobs +through history within their sparse specification may be too much, so they +only download some. They would still like operations to succeed without +network connectivity, though, so things like `git log -S${SEARCH_TERM} -p` +or `git grep ${SEARCH_TERM} OLDREV ` would need to be prepared to provide +partial results that depend on what happens to have been downloaded. + +This variant could be viewed as Behavior A with the sparse specification +for history querying operations modified from "sparsity patterns" to +"sparsity patterns limited to the blobs we have already downloaded". + + (Behavior B) Users want a sparse working tree, but are working in a + larger whole + +Stolee described this usecase this way[11]: + +"I'm also focused on users that know that they are a part of a larger +whole. They know they are operating on a large repository but focus on +what they need to contribute their part. I expect multiple "roles" to +use very different, almost disjoint parts of the codebase. Some other +"architect" users operate across the entire tree or hop between different +sections of the codebase as necessary. In this situation, I'm wary of +scoping too many features to the sparse-checkout definition, especially +"git log," as it can be too confusing to have their view of the codebase +depend on your "point of view." + +People might also end up wanting behavior B due to complex inter-project +dependencies. The initial attempts to use sparse-checkouts usually involve +the directories you are directly interested in plus what those directories +depend upon within your repository. But there's a monkey wrench here: if +you have integration tests, they invert the hierarchy: to run integration +tests, you need not only what you are interested in and its in-tree +dependencies, you also need everything that depends upon what you are +interested in or that depends upon one of your dependencies...AND you need +all the in-tree dependencies of that expanded group. That can easily +change your sparse-checkout into a nearly dense one. + +Naturally, that tends to kill the benefits of sparse-checkouts. There are +a couple solutions to this conundrum: either avoid grabbing in-repo +dependencies (maybe have built versions of your in-repo dependencies pulled +from a CI cache somewhere), or say that users shouldn't run integration +tests directly and instead do it on the CI server when they submit a code +review. Or do both. Regardless of whether you stub out your in-repo +dependencies or stub out the things that depend upon you, there is +certainly a reason to want to query and be aware of those other stubbed-out +parts of the repository, particularly when the dependencies are complex or +change relatively frequently. Thus, for such uses, sparse-checkouts can be +used to limit what you directly build and modify, but these users do not +necessarily want their sparse checkout paths to limit their queries of +versions in history. + +Some people may also be interested in behavior B over behavior A simply as +a performance workaround: if they are using non-cone mode, then they have +to deal with its inherent quadratic performance problems. In that mode, +every operation that checks whether paths match the sparsity specification +can be expensive. As such, these users may only be willing to pay for +those expensive checks when interacting with the working copy, and may +prefer getting "unrelated" results from their history queries over having +slow commands. + + (Behavior C) sparse-checkout is an implementational detail supporting a + special VFS. + +This usecase goes slightly against the traditional definition of +sparse-checkout in that it actually tries to present a full or dense +checkout to the user. However, this usecase utilizes the same underlying +technical underpinnings in a new way which does provide some performance +advantages to users. The basic idea is that a company can have an in-house +Git-aware Virtual File System which pretends all files are present in the +working tree, by intercepting all file system accesses and using those to +fetch and write accessed files on demand via partial clones. The VFS uses +sparse-checkout to prevent Git from writing or paying attention to many +files, and manually updates the sparse checkout patterns itself based on +user access and modification of files in the working tree. See commit +ecc7c8841d ("repo_read_index: add config to expect files outside sparse +patterns", 2022-02-25) and the link at [17] for a more detailed description +of such a VFS. + +The biggest difference here is that users are completely unaware that the +sparse-checkout machinery is even in use. The sparse patterns are not +specified by the user but rather are under the complete control of the VFS +(and the patterns are updated frequently and dynamically by it). The user +will perceive the checkout as dense, and commands should thus behave as if +all files are present. + + +=== Usecases of primary concern === + +Most of the rest of this document will focus on Behavior A and Behavior +B. Some notes about the other two cases and why we are not focusing on +them: + + (Behavior A*) + +Supporting this usecase is estimated to be difficult and a lot of work. +There are no plans to implement it currently, but it may be a potential +future alternative. Knowing about the existence of additional alternatives +may affect our choice of command line flags (e.g. if we need tri-state or +quad-state flags rather than just binary flags), so it was still important +to at least note. + +Further, I believe the descriptions below for Behavior A are probably still +valid for this usecase, with the only exception being that it redefines the +sparse specification to restrict it to already-downloaded blobs. The hard +part is in making commands capable of respecting that modified definition. + + (Behavior C) + +This usecase violates some of the early sparse-checkout documented +assumptions (since files marked as SKIP_WORKTREE will be displayed to users +as present in the working tree). That violation may mean various +sparse-checkout related behaviors are not well suited to this usecase and +we may need tweaks -- to both documentation and code -- to handle it. +However, this usecase is also perhaps the simplest model to support in that +everything behaves like a dense checkout with a few exceptions (e.g. branch +checkouts and switches write fewer things, knowing the VFS will lazily +write the rest on an as-needed basis). + +Since there is no publically available VFS-related code for folks to try, +the number of folks who can test such a usecase is limited. + +The primary reason to note the Behavior C usecase is that as we fix things +to better support Behaviors A and B, there may be additional places where +we need to make tweaks allowing folks in this usecase to get the original +non-sparse treatment. For an example, see ecc7c8841d ("repo_read_index: +add config to expect files outside sparse patterns", 2022-02-25). The +secondary reason to note Behavior C, is so that folks taking advantage of +Behavior C do not assume they are part of the Behavior B camp and propose +patches that break things for the real Behavior B folks. + + +=== Oversimplified mental models === + +An oversimplification of the differences in the above behaviors is: + + Behavior A: Restrict worktree and history operations to sparse specification + Behavior B: Restrict worktree operations to sparse specification; have any + history operations work across all files + Behavior C: Do not restrict either worktree or history operations to the + sparse specification...with the exception of branch checkouts or + switches which avoid writing files that will match the index so + they can later lazily be populated instead. + + +=== Desired behavior === + +As noted previously, despite the simple idea of just working with a subset +of files, there are a range of different behavioral changes that need to be +made to different subcommands to work well with such a feature. See +[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] for various examples. In particular, at [2], we saw +that mere composition of other commands that individually worked correctly +in a sparse-checkout context did not imply that the higher level command +would work correctly; it sometimes requires further tweaks. So, +understanding these differences can be beneficial. + +* Commands behaving the same regardless of high-level use-case + + * commands that only look at files within the sparsity specification + + * diff (without --cached or REVISION arguments) + * grep (without --cached or REVISION arguments) + * diff-files + + * commands that restore files to the working tree that match sparsity + patterns, and remove unmodified files that don't match those + patterns: + + * switch + * checkout (the switch-like half) + * read-tree + * reset --hard + + * commands that write conflicted files to the working tree, but otherwise + will omit writing files to the working tree that do not match the + sparsity patterns: + + * merge + * rebase + * cherry-pick + * revert + + * `am` and `apply --cached` should probably be in this section but + are buggy (see the "Known bugs" section below) + + The behavior for these commands somewhat depends upon the merge + strategy being used: + * `ort` behaves as described above + * `recursive` tries to not vivify files unnecessarily, but does sometimes + vivify files without conflicts. + * `octopus` and `resolve` will always vivify any file changed in the merge + relative to the first parent, which is rather suboptimal. + + It is also important to note that these commands WILL update the index + outside the sparse specification relative to when the operation began, + BUT these commands often make a commit just before or after such that + by the end of the operation there is no change to the index outside the + sparse specification. Of course, if the operation hits conflicts or + does not make a commit, then these operations clearly can modify the + index outside the sparse specification. + + Finally, it is important to note that at least the first four of these + commands also try to remove differences between the sparse + specification and the sparsity patterns (much like the commands in the + previous section). + + * commands that always ignore sparsity since commits must be full-tree + + * archive + * bundle + * commit + * format-patch + * fast-export + * fast-import + * commit-tree + + * commands that write any modified file to the working tree (conflicted + or not, and whether those paths match sparsity patterns or not): + + * stash + * apply (without `--index` or `--cached`) + +* Commands that may slightly differ for behavior A vs. behavior B: + + Commands in this category behave mostly the same between the two + behaviors, but may differ in verbosity and types of warning and error + messages. + + * commands that make modifications to which files are tracked: + * add + * rm + * mv + * update-index + + The fact that files can move between the 'tracked' and 'untracked' + categories means some commands will have to treat untracked files + differently. But if we have to treat untracked files differently, + then additional commands may also need changes: + + * status + * clean + + In particular, `status` may need to report any untracked files outside + the sparsity specification as an erroneous condition (especially to + avoid the user trying to `git add` them, forcing `git add` to display + an error). + + It's not clear to me exactly how (or even if) `clean` would change, + but it's the other command that also affects untracked files. + + `update-index` may be slightly special. Its --[no-]skip-worktree flag + may need to ignore the sparse specification by its nature. Also, its + current --[no-]ignore-skip-worktree-entries default is totally bogus. + + * commands for manually tweaking paths in both the index and the working tree + * `restore` + * the restore-like half of `checkout` + + These commands should be similar to add/rm/mv in that they should + only operate on the sparse specification by default, and require a + special flag to operate on all files. + + Also, note that these commands currently have a number of issues (see + the "Known bugs" section below) + +* Commands that significantly differ for behavior A vs. behavior B: + + * commands that query history + * diff (with --cached or REVISION arguments) + * grep (with --cached or REVISION arguments) + * show (when given commit arguments) + * blame (only matters when one or more -C flags are passed) + * and annotate + * log + * whatchanged + * ls-files + * diff-index + * diff-tree + * ls-tree + + Note: for log and whatchanged, revision walking logic is unaffected + but displaying of patches is affected by scoping the command to the + sparse-checkout. (The fact that revision walking is unaffected is + why rev-list, shortlog, show-branch, and bisect are not in this + list.) + + ls-files may be slightly special in that e.g. `git ls-files -t` is + often used to see what is sparse and what is not. Perhaps -t should + always work on the full tree? + +* Commands I don't know how to classify + + * range-diff + + Is this like `log` or `format-patch`? + + * cherry + + See range-diff + +* Commands unaffected by sparse-checkouts + + * shortlog + * show-branch + * rev-list + * bisect + + * branch + * describe + * fetch + * gc + * init + * maintenance + * notes + * pull (merge & rebase have the necessary changes) + * push + * submodule + * tag + + * config + * filter-branch (works in separate checkout without sparse-checkout setup) + * pack-refs + * prune + * remote + * repack + * replace + + * bugreport + * count-objects + * fsck + * gitweb + * help + * instaweb + * merge-tree (doesn't touch worktree or index, and merges always compute full-tree) + * rerere + * verify-commit + * verify-tag + + * commit-graph + * hash-object + * index-pack + * mktag + * mktree + * multi-pack-index + * pack-objects + * prune-packed + * symbolic-ref + * unpack-objects + * update-ref + * write-tree (operates on index, possibly optimized to use sparse dir entries) + + * for-each-ref + * get-tar-commit-id + * ls-remote + * merge-base (merges are computed full tree, so merge base should be too) + * name-rev + * pack-redundant + * rev-parse + * show-index + * show-ref + * unpack-file + * var + * verify-pack + + * <Everything under 'Interacting with Others' in 'git help --all'> + * <Everything under 'Low-level...Syncing' in 'git help --all'> + * <Everything under 'Low-level...Internal Helpers' in 'git help --all'> + * <Everything under 'External commands' in 'git help --all'> + +* Commands that might be affected, but who cares? + + * merge-file + * merge-index + * gitk? + + +=== Behavior classes === + +From the above there are a few classes of behavior: + + * "restrict" + + Commands in this class only read or write files in the working tree + within the sparse specification. + + When moving to a new commit (e.g. switch, reset --hard), these commands + may update index files outside the sparse specification as of the start + of the operation, but by the end of the operation those index files + will match HEAD again and thus those files will again be outside the + sparse specification. + + When paths are explicitly specified, these paths are intersected with + the sparse specification and will only operate on such paths. + (e.g. `git restore [--staged] -- '*.png'`, `git reset -p -- '*.md'`) + + Some of these commands may also attempt, at the end of their operation, + to cull transient differences between the sparse specification and the + sparsity patterns (see "Sparse specification vs. sparsity patterns" for + details, but this basically means either removing unmodified files not + matching the sparsity patterns and marking those files as + SKIP_WORKTREE, or vivifying files that match the sparsity patterns and + marking those files as !SKIP_WORKTREE). + + * "restrict modulo conflicts" + + Commands in this class generally behave like the "restrict" class, + except that: + (1) they will ignore the sparse specification and write files with + conflicts to the working tree (thus temporarily expanding the + sparse specification to include such files.) + (2) they are grouped with commands which move to a new commit, since + they often create a commit and then move to it, even though we + know there are many exceptions to moving to the new commit. (For + example, the user may rebase a commit that becomes empty, or have + a cherry-pick which conflicts, or a user could run `merge + --no-commit`, and we also view `apply --index` kind of like `am + --no-commit`.) As such, these commands can make changes to index + files outside the sparse specification, though they'll mark such + files with SKIP_WORKTREE. + + * "restrict also specially applied to untracked files" + + Commands in this class generally behave like the "restrict" class, + except that they have to handle untracked files differently too, often + because these commands are dealing with files changing state between + 'tracked' and 'untracked'. Often, this may mean printing an error + message if the command had nothing to do, but the arguments may have + referred to files whose tracked-ness state could have changed were it + not for the sparsity patterns excluding them. + + * "no restrict" + + Commands in this class ignore the sparse specification entirely. + + * "restrict or no restrict dependent upon behavior A vs. behavior B" + + Commands in this class behave like "no restrict" for folks in the + behavior B camp, and like "restrict" for folks in the behavior A camp. + However, when behaving like "restrict" a warning of some sort might be + provided that history queries have been limited by the sparse-checkout + specification. + + +=== Subcommand-dependent defaults === + +Note that we have different defaults depending on the command for the +desired behavior : + + * Commands defaulting to "restrict": + * diff-files + * diff (without --cached or REVISION arguments) + * grep (without --cached or REVISION arguments) + * switch + * checkout (the switch-like half) + * reset (<commit>) + + * restore + * checkout (the restore-like half) + * checkout-index + * reset (with pathspec) + + This behavior makes sense; these interact with the working tree. + + * Commands defaulting to "restrict modulo conflicts": + * merge + * rebase + * cherry-pick + * revert + + * am + * apply --index (which is kind of like an `am --no-commit`) + + * read-tree (especially with -m or -u; is kind of like a --no-commit merge) + * reset (<tree-ish>, due to similarity to read-tree) + + These also interact with the working tree, but require slightly + different behavior either so that (a) conflicts can be resolved or (b) + because they are kind of like a merge-without-commit operation. + + (See also the "Known bugs" section below regarding `am` and `apply`) + + * Commands defaulting to "no restrict": + * archive + * bundle + * commit + * format-patch + * fast-export + * fast-import + * commit-tree + + * stash + * apply (without `--index`) + + These have completely different defaults and perhaps deserve the most + detailed explanation: + + In the case of commands in the first group (format-patch, + fast-export, bundle, archive, etc.), these are commands for + communicating history, which will be broken if they restrict to a + subset of the repository. As such, they operate on full paths and + have no `--restrict` option for overriding. Some of these commands may + take paths for manually restricting what is exported, but it needs to + be very explicit. + + In the case of stash, it needs to vivify files to avoid losing the + user's changes. + + In the case of apply without `--index`, that command needs to update + the working tree without the index (or the index without the working + tree if `--cached` is passed), and if we restrict those updates to the + sparse specification then we'll lose changes from the user. + + * Commands defaulting to "restrict also specially applied to untracked files": + * add + * rm + * mv + * update-index + * status + * clean (?) + + Our original implementation for the first three of these commands was + "no restrict", but it had some severe usability issues: + * `git add <somefile>` if honored and outside the sparse + specification, can result in the file randomly disappearing later + when some subsequent command is run (since various commands + automatically clean up unmodified files outside the sparse + specification). + * `git rm '*.jpg'` could very negatively surprise users if it deletes + files outside the range of the user's interest. + * `git mv` has similar surprises when moving into or out of the cone, + so best to restrict by default + + So, we switched `add` and `rm` to default to "restrict", which made + usability problems much less severe and less frequent, but we still got + complaints because commands like: + git add <file-outside-sparse-specification> + git rm <file-outside-sparse-specification> + would silently do nothing. We should instead print an error in those + cases to get usability right. + + update-index needs to be updated to match, and status and maybe clean + also need to be updated to specially handle untracked paths. + + There may be a difference in here between behavior A and behavior B in + terms of verboseness of errors or additional warnings. + + * Commands falling under "restrict or no restrict dependent upon behavior + A vs. behavior B" + + * diff (with --cached or REVISION arguments) + * grep (with --cached or REVISION arguments) + * show (when given commit arguments) + * blame (only matters when one or more -C flags passed) + * and annotate + * log + * and variants: shortlog, gitk, show-branch, whatchanged, rev-list + * ls-files + * diff-index + * diff-tree + * ls-tree + + For now, we default to behavior B for these, which want a default of + "no restrict". + + Note that two of these commands -- diff and grep -- also appeared in a + different list with a default of "restrict", but only when limited to + searching the working tree. The working tree vs. history distinction + is fundamental in how behavior B operates, so this is expected. Note, + though, that for diff and grep with --cached, when doing "restrict" + behavior, the difference between sparse specification and sparsity + patterns is important to handle. + + "restrict" may make more sense as the long term default for these[12]. + Also, supporting "restrict" for these commands might be a fair amount + of work to implement, meaning it might be implemented over multiple + releases. If that behavior were the default in the commands that + supported it, that would force behavior B users to need to learn to + slowly add additional flags to their commands, depending on git + version, to get the behavior they want. That gradual switchover would + be painful, so we should avoid it at least until it's fully + implemented. + + +=== Sparse specification vs. sparsity patterns === + +In a well-behaved situation, the sparse specification is given directly +by the $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout file. However, it can transiently +diverge for a few reasons: + + * needing to resolve conflicts (merging will vivify conflicted files) + * running Git commands that implicitly vivify files (e.g. "git stash apply") + * running Git commands that explicitly vivify files (e.g. "git checkout + --ignore-skip-worktree-bits FILENAME") + * other commands that write to these files (perhaps a user copies it + from elsewhere) + +For the last item, note that we do automatically clear the SKIP_WORKTREE +bit for files that are present in the working tree. This has been true +since 82386b4496 ("Merge branch 'en/present-despite-skipped'", +2022-03-09) + +However, such a situation is transient because: + + * Such transient differences can and will be automatically removed as + a side-effect of commands which call unpack_trees() (checkout, + merge, reset, etc.). + * Users can also request such transient differences be corrected via + running `git sparse-checkout reapply`. Various places recommend + running that command. + * Additional commands are also welcome to implicitly fix these + differences; we may add more in the future. + +While we avoid dropping unstaged changes or files which have conflicts, +we otherwise aggressively try to fix these transient differences. If +users want these differences to persist, they should run the `set` or +`add` subcommands of `git sparse-checkout` to reflect their intended +sparse specification. + +However, when we need to do a query on history restricted to the +"relevant subset of files" such a transiently expanded sparse +specification is ignored. There are a couple reasons for this: + + * The behavior wanted when doing something like + git grep expression REVISION + is roughly what the users would expect from + git checkout REVISION && git grep expression + (modulo a "REVISION:" prefix), which has a couple ramifications: + + * REVISION may have paths not in the current index, so there is no + path we can consult for a SKIP_WORKTREE setting for those paths. + + * Since `checkout` is one of those commands that tries to remove + transient differences in the sparse specification, it makes sense + to use the corrected sparse specification + (i.e. $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout) rather than attempting to + consult SKIP_WORKTREE anyway. + +So, a transiently expanded (or restricted) sparse specification applies to +the working tree, but not to history queries where we always use the +sparsity patterns. (See [16] for an early discussion of this.) + +Similar to a transiently expanded sparse specification of the working tree +based on additional files being present in the working tree, we also need +to consider additional files being modified in the index. In particular, +if the user has staged changes to files (relative to HEAD) that do not +match the sparsity patterns, and the file is not present in the working +tree, we still want to consider the file part of the sparse specification +if we are specifically performing a query related to the index (e.g. git +diff --cached [REVISION], git diff-index [REVISION], git restore --staged +--source=REVISION -- PATHS, etc.) Note that a transiently expanded sparse +specification for the index usually only matters under behavior A, since +under behavior B index operations are lumped with history and tend to +operate full-tree. + + +=== Implementation Questions === + + * Do the options --scope={sparse,all} sound good to others? Are there better + options? + * Names in use, or appearing in patches, or previously suggested: + * --sparse/--dense + * --ignore-skip-worktree-bits + * --ignore-skip-worktree-entries + * --ignore-sparsity + * --[no-]restrict-to-sparse-paths + * --full-tree/--sparse-tree + * --[no-]restrict + * --scope={sparse,all} + * --focus/--unfocus + * --limit/--unlimited + * Rationale making me lean slightly towards --scope={sparse,all}: + * We want a name that works for many commands, so we need a name that + does not conflict + * We know that we have more than two possible usecases, so it is best + to avoid a flag that appears to be binary. + * --scope={sparse,all} isn't overly long and seems relatively + explanatory + * `--sparse`, as used in add/rm/mv, is totally backwards for + grep/log/etc. Changing the meaning of `--sparse` for these + commands would fix the backwardness, but possibly break existing + scripts. Using a new name pairing would allow us to treat + `--sparse` in these commands as a deprecated alias. + * There is a different `--sparse`/`--dense` pair for commands using + revision machinery, so using that naming might cause confusion + * There is also a `--sparse` in both pack-objects and show-branch, which + don't conflict but do suggest that `--sparse` is overloaded + * The name --ignore-skip-worktree-bits is a double negative, is + quite a mouthful, refers to an implementation detail that many + users may not be familiar with, and we'd need a negation for it + which would probably be even more ridiculously long. (But we + can make --ignore-skip-worktree-bits a deprecated alias for + --no-restrict.) + + * If a config option is added (sparse.scope?) what should the values and + description be? "sparse" (behavior A), "worktree-sparse-history-dense" + (behavior B), "dense" (behavior C)? There's a risk of confusion, + because even for Behaviors A and B we want some commands to be + full-tree and others to operate sparsely, so the wording may need to be + more tied to the usecases and somehow explain that. Also, right now, + the primary difference we are focusing is just the history-querying + commands (log/diff/grep). Previous config suggestion here: [13] + + * Is `--no-expand` a good alias for ls-files's `--sparse` option? + (`--sparse` does not map to either `--scope=sparse` or `--scope=all`, + because in non-cone mode it does nothing and in cone-mode it shows the + sparse directory entries which are technically outside the sparse + specification) + + * Under Behavior A: + * Does ls-files' `--no-expand` override the default `--scope=all`, or + does it need an extra flag? + * Does ls-files' `-t` option imply `--scope=all`? + * Does update-index's `--[no-]skip-worktree` option imply `--scope=all`? + + * sparse-checkout: once behavior A is fully implemented, should we take + an interim measure to ease people into switching the default? Namely, + if folks are not already in a sparse checkout, then require + `sparse-checkout init/set` to take a + `--set-scope=(sparse|worktree-sparse-history-dense|dense)` flag (which + would set sparse.scope according to the setting given), and throw an + error if the flag is not provided? That error would be a great place + to warn folks that the default may change in the future, and get them + used to specifying what they want so that the eventual default switch + is seamless for them. + + +=== Implementation Goals/Plans === + + * Get buy-in on this document in general. + + * Figure out answers to the 'Implementation Questions' sections (above) + + * Fix bugs in the 'Known bugs' section (below) + + * Provide some kind of method for backfilling the blobs within the sparse + specification in a partial clone + + [Below here is kind of spitballing since the first two haven't been resolved] + + * update-index: flip the default to --no-ignore-skip-worktree-entries, + nuke this stupid "Oh, there's a bug? Let me add a flag to let users + request that they not trigger this bug." flag + + * Flags & Config + * Make `--sparse` in add/rm/mv a deprecated alias for `--scope=all` + * Make `--ignore-skip-worktree-bits` in checkout-index/checkout/restore + a deprecated aliases for `--scope=all` + * Create config option (sparse.scope?), tie it to the "Cliff notes" + overview + + * Add --scope=sparse (and --scope=all) flag to each of the history querying + commands. IMPORTANT: make sure diff machinery changes don't mess with + format-patch, fast-export, etc. + +=== Known bugs === + +This list used to be a lot longer (see e.g. [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]), but we've +been working on it. + +0. Behavior A is not well supported in Git. (Behavior B didn't used to + be either, but was the easier of the two to implement.) + +1. am and apply: + + apply, without `--index` or `--cached`, relies on files being present + in the working copy, and also writes to them unconditionally. As + such, it should first check for the files' presence, and if found to + be SKIP_WORKTREE, then clear the bit and vivify the paths, then do + its work. Currently, it just throws an error. + + apply, with either `--cached` or `--index`, will not preserve the + SKIP_WORKTREE bit. This is fine if the file has conflicts, but + otherwise SKIP_WORKTREE bits should be preserved for --cached and + probably also for --index. + + am, if there are no conflicts, will vivify files and fail to preserve + the SKIP_WORKTREE bit. If there are conflicts and `-3` is not + specified, it will vivify files and then complain the patch doesn't + apply. If there are conflicts and `-3` is specified, it will vivify + files and then complain that those vivified files would be + overwritten by merge. + +2. reset --hard: + + reset --hard provides confusing error message (works correctly, but + misleads the user into believing it didn't): + + $ touch addme + $ git add addme + $ git ls-files -t + H addme + H tracked + S tracked-but-maybe-skipped + $ git reset --hard # usually works great + error: Path 'addme' not uptodate; will not remove from working tree. + HEAD is now at bdbbb6f third + $ git ls-files -t + H tracked + S tracked-but-maybe-skipped + $ ls -1 + tracked + + `git reset --hard` DID remove addme from the index and the working tree, contrary + to the error message, but in line with how reset --hard should behave. + +3. read-tree + + `read-tree` doesn't apply the 'SKIP_WORKTREE' bit to *any* of the + entries it reads into the index, resulting in all your files suddenly + appearing to be "deleted". + +4. Checkout, restore: + + These command do not handle path & revision arguments appropriately: + + $ ls + tracked + $ git ls-files -t + H tracked + S tracked-but-maybe-skipped + $ git status --porcelain + $ git checkout -- '*skipped' + error: pathspec '*skipped' did not match any file(s) known to git + $ git ls-files -- '*skipped' + tracked-but-maybe-skipped + $ git checkout HEAD -- '*skipped' + error: pathspec '*skipped' did not match any file(s) known to git + $ git ls-tree HEAD | grep skipped + 100644 blob 276f5a64354b791b13840f02047738c77ad0584f tracked-but-maybe-skipped + $ git status --porcelain + $ git checkout HEAD~1 -- '*skipped' + $ git ls-files -t + H tracked + H tracked-but-maybe-skipped + $ git status --porcelain + M tracked-but-maybe-skipped + $ git checkout HEAD -- '*skipped' + $ git status --porcelain + $ + + Note that checkout without a revision (or restore --staged) fails to + find a file to restore from the index, even though ls-files shows + such a file certainly exists. + + Similar issues occur with HEAD (--source=HEAD in restore's case), + but suddenly works when HEAD~1 is specified. And then after that it + will work with HEAD specified, even though it didn't before. + + Directories are also an issue: + + $ git sparse-checkout set nomatches + $ git status + On branch main + You are in a sparse checkout with 0% of tracked files present. + + nothing to commit, working tree clean + $ git checkout . + error: pathspec '.' did not match any file(s) known to git + $ git checkout HEAD~1 . + Updated 1 path from 58916d9 + $ git ls-files -t + S tracked + H tracked-but-maybe-skipped + +5. checkout and restore --staged, continued: + + These commands do not correctly scope operations to the sparse + specification, and make it worse by not setting important SKIP_WORKTREE + bits: + + $ git restore --source OLDREV --staged outside-sparse-cone/ + $ git status --porcelain + MD outside-sparse-cone/file1 + MD outside-sparse-cone/file2 + MD outside-sparse-cone/file3 + + We can add a --scope=all mode to `git restore` to let it operate outside + the sparse specification, but then it will be important to set the + SKIP_WORKTREE bits appropriately. + +6. Performance issues; see: + https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BEkJQoKZsQGCYioyga_uoDQ6iBeW+FKr8JhyuuTMK1RDw@mail.gmail.com/ + + +=== Reference Emails === + +Emails that detail various bugs we've had in sparse-checkout: + +[1] (Original descriptions of behavior A & behavior B) + https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BGJ_Nvi5TmgriD9Bh6eNXE2EDq2f8e8QKXAeYG3BxZafA@mail.gmail.com/ +[2] (Fix stash applications in sparse checkouts; bugs from behavioral differences) + https://lore.kernel.org/git/ccfedc7140dbf63ba26a15f93bd3885180b26517.1606861519.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ +[3] (Present-despite-skipped entries) + https://lore.kernel.org/git/11d46a399d26c913787b704d2b7169cafc28d639.1642175983.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ +[4] (Clone --no-checkout interaction) + https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.801.v2.git.git.1591324899170.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ (clone --no-checkout) +[5] (The need for update_sparsity() and avoiding `read-tree -mu HEAD`) + https://lore.kernel.org/git/3a1f084641eb47515b5a41ed4409a36128913309.1585270142.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ +[6] (SKIP_WORKTREE is advisory, not mandatory) + https://lore.kernel.org/git/844306c3e86ef67591cc086decb2b760e7d710a3.1585270142.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ +[7] (`worktree add` should copy sparsity settings from current worktree) + https://lore.kernel.org/git/c51cb3714e7b1d2f8c9370fe87eca9984ff4859f.1644269584.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ +[8] (Avoid negative surprises in add, rm, and mv) + https://lore.kernel.org/git/cover.1617914011.git.matheus.bernardino@usp.br/ + https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1018.v4.git.1632497954.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ +[9] (Move from out-of-cone to in-cone) + https://lore.kernel.org/git/20220630023737.473690-6-shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com/ + https://lore.kernel.org/git/20220630023737.473690-4-shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com/ +[10] (Unnecessarily downloading objects outside sparse specification) + https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAOLTT8QfwOi9yx_qZZgyGa8iL8kHWutEED7ok_jxwTcYT_hf9Q@mail.gmail.com/ + +[11] (Stolee's comments on high-level usecases) + https://lore.kernel.org/git/1a1e33f6-3514-9afc-0a28-5a6b85bd8014@gmail.com/ + +[12] Others commenting on eventually switching default to behavior A: + * https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqh719pcoo.fsf@gitster.g/ + * https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqzgeqw0sy.fsf@gitster.g/ + * https://lore.kernel.org/git/a86af661-cf58-a4e5-0214-a67d3a794d7e@github.com/ + +[13] Previous config name suggestion and description + * https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BE6zW0nJSStcVU=_DoDBnPgLqOR8pkTXK3dW11=T01OhA@mail.gmail.com/ + +[14] Tangential issue: switch to cone mode as default sparse specification mechanism: + https://lore.kernel.org/git/a1b68fd6126eb341ef3637bb93fedad4309b36d0.1650594746.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ + +[15] Lengthy email on grep behavior, covering what should be searched: + * https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BGVO3QdbfE84uF_3QDF0-y2iHHh6G5FAFzNRfeRitkuHw@mail.gmail.com/ + +[16] Email explaining sparsity patterns vs. SKIP_WORKTREE and history operations, + search for the parenthetical comment starting "We do not check". + https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BFsCPPNOZ92JQRJeGyNd0e-TCW-LcLyr0i_+VSQJP+GCg@mail.gmail.com/ + +[17] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20220207190320.2960362-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/ diff --git a/Documentation/technical/sparse-index.txt b/Documentation/technical/sparse-index.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3b24c1a --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/sparse-index.txt @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@ +Git Sparse-Index Design Document +================================ + +The sparse-checkout feature allows users to focus a working directory on +a subset of the files at HEAD. The cone mode patterns, enabled by +`core.sparseCheckoutCone`, allow for very fast pattern matching to +discover which files at HEAD belong in the sparse-checkout cone. + +Three important scale dimensions for a Git working directory are: + +* `HEAD`: How many files are present at `HEAD`? + +* Populated: How many files are within the sparse-checkout cone. + +* Modified: How many files has the user modified in the working directory? + +We will use big-O notation -- O(X) -- to denote how expensive certain +operations are in terms of these dimensions. + +These dimensions are ordered by their magnitude: users (typically) modify +fewer files than are populated, and we can only populate files at `HEAD`. + +Problems occur if there is an extreme imbalance in these dimensions. For +example, if `HEAD` contains millions of paths but the populated set has +only tens of thousands, then commands like `git status` and `git add` can +be dominated by operations that require O(`HEAD`) operations instead of +O(Populated). Primarily, the cost is in parsing and rewriting the index, +which is filled primarily with files at `HEAD` that are marked with the +`SKIP_WORKTREE` bit. + +The sparse-index intends to take these commands that read and modify the +index from O(`HEAD`) to O(Populated). To do this, we need to modify the +index format in a significant way: add "sparse directory" entries. + +With cone mode patterns, it is possible to detect when an entire +directory will have its contents outside of the sparse-checkout definition. +Instead of listing all of the files it contains as individual entries, a +sparse-index contains an entry with the directory name, referencing the +object ID of the tree at `HEAD` and marked with the `SKIP_WORKTREE` bit. +If we need to discover the details for paths within that directory, we +can parse trees to find that list. + +At time of writing, sparse-directory entries violate expectations about the +index format and its in-memory data structure. There are many consumers in +the codebase that expect to iterate through all of the index entries and +see only files. In fact, these loops expect to see a reference to every +staged file. One way to handle this is to parse trees to replace a +sparse-directory entry with all of the files within that tree as the index +is loaded. However, parsing trees is slower than parsing the index format, +so that is a slower operation than if we left the index alone. The plan is +to make all of these integrations "sparse aware" so this expansion through +tree parsing is unnecessary and they use fewer resources than when using a +full index. + +The implementation plan below follows four phases to slowly integrate with +the sparse-index. The intention is to incrementally update Git commands to +interact safely with the sparse-index without significant slowdowns. This +may not always be possible, but the hope is that the primary commands that +users need in their daily work are dramatically improved. + +Phase I: Format and initial speedups +------------------------------------ + +During this phase, Git learns to enable the sparse-index and safely parse +one. Protections are put in place so that every consumer of the in-memory +data structure can operate with its current assumption of every file at +`HEAD`. + +At first, every index parse will call a helper method, +`ensure_full_index()`, which scans the index for sparse-directory entries +(pointing to trees) and replaces them with the full list of paths (with +blob contents) by parsing tree objects. This will be slower in all cases. +The only noticeable change in behavior will be that the serialized index +file contains sparse-directory entries. + +To start, we use a new required index extension, `sdir`, to allow +inserting sparse-directory entries into indexes with file format +versions 2, 3, and 4. This prevents Git versions that do not understand +the sparse-index from operating on one, while allowing tools that do not +understand the sparse-index to operate on repositories as long as they do +not interact with the index. A new format, index v5, will be introduced +that includes sparse-directory entries by default. It might also +introduce other features that have been considered for improving the +index, as well. + +Next, consumers of the index will be guarded against operating on a +sparse-index by inserting calls to `ensure_full_index()` or +`expand_index_to_path()`. If a specific path is requested, then those will +be protected from within the `index_file_exists()` and `index_name_pos()` +API calls: they will call `ensure_full_index()` if necessary. The +intention here is to preserve existing behavior when interacting with a +sparse-checkout. We don't want a change to happen by accident, without +tests. Many of these locations may not need any change before removing the +guards, but we should not do so without tests to ensure the expected +behavior happens. + +It may be desirable to _change_ the behavior of some commands in the +presence of a sparse index or more generally in any sparse-checkout +scenario. In such cases, these should be carefully communicated and +tested. No such behavior changes are intended during this phase. + +During a scan of the codebase, not every iteration of the cache entries +needs an `ensure_full_index()` check. The basic reasons include: + +1. The loop is scanning for entries with non-zero stage. These entries + are not collapsed into a sparse-directory entry. + +2. The loop is scanning for submodules. These entries are not collapsed + into a sparse-directory entry. + +3. The loop is part of the index API, especially around reading or + writing the format. + +4. The loop is checking for correct order of cache entries and that is + correct if and only if the sparse-directory entries are in the correct + location. + +5. The loop ignores entries with the `SKIP_WORKTREE` bit set, or is + otherwise already aware of sparse directory entries. + +6. The sparse-index is disabled at this point when using the split-index + feature, so no effort is made to protect the split-index API. + +Even after inserting these guards, we will keep expanding sparse-indexes +for most Git commands using the `command_requires_full_index` repository +setting. This setting will be on by default and disabled one builtin at a +time until we have sufficient confidence that all of the index operations +are properly guarded. + +To complete this phase, the commands `git status` and `git add` will be +integrated with the sparse-index so that they operate with O(Populated) +performance. They will be carefully tested for operations within and +outside the sparse-checkout definition. + +Phase II: Careful integrations +------------------------------ + +This phase focuses on ensuring that all index extensions and APIs work +well with a sparse-index. This requires significant increases to our test +coverage, especially for operations that interact with the working +directory outside of the sparse-checkout definition. Some of these +behaviors may not be the desirable ones, such as some tests already +marked for failure in `t1092-sparse-checkout-compatibility.sh`. + +The index extensions that may require special integrations are: + +* FS Monitor +* Untracked cache + +While integrating with these features, we should look for patterns that +might lead to better APIs for interacting with the index. Coalescing +common usage patterns into an API call can reduce the number of places +where sparse-directories need to be handled carefully. + +Phase III: Important command speedups +------------------------------------- + +At this point, the patterns for testing and implementing sparse-directory +logic should be relatively stable. This phase focuses on updating some of +the most common builtins that use the index to operate as O(Populated). +Here is a potential list of commands that could be valuable to integrate +at this point: + +* `git commit` +* `git checkout` +* `git merge` +* `git rebase` + +Hopefully, commands such as `git merge` and `git rebase` can benefit +instead from merge algorithms that do not use the index as a data +structure, such as the merge-ORT strategy. As these topics mature, we +may enable the ORT strategy by default for repositories using the +sparse-index feature. + +Along with `git status` and `git add`, these commands cover the majority +of users' interactions with the working directory. In addition, we can +integrate with these commands: + +* `git grep` +* `git rm` + +These have been proposed as some whose behavior could change when in a +repo with a sparse-checkout definition. It would be good to include this +behavior automatically when using a sparse-index. Some clarity is needed +to make the behavior switch clear to the user. + +This phase is the first where parallel work might be possible without too +much conflicts between topics. + +Phase IV: The long tail +----------------------- + +This last phase is less a "phase" and more "the new normal" after all of +the previous work. + +To start, the `command_requires_full_index` option could be removed in +favor of expanding only when hitting an API guard. + +There are many Git commands that could use special attention to operate as +O(Populated), while some might be so rare that it is acceptable to leave +them with additional overhead when a sparse-index is present. + +Here are some commands that might be useful to update: + +* `git sparse-checkout set` +* `git am` +* `git clean` +* `git stash` diff --git a/Documentation/technical/trivial-merge.txt b/Documentation/technical/trivial-merge.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1f1c33d --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/technical/trivial-merge.txt @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ +Trivial merge rules +=================== + +This document describes the outcomes of the trivial merge logic in read-tree. + +One-way merge +------------- + +This replaces the index with a different tree, keeping the stat info +for entries that don't change, and allowing -u to make the minimum +required changes to the working tree to have it match. + +Entries marked '+' have stat information. Spaces marked '*' don't +affect the result. + + index tree result + ----------------------- + * (empty) (empty) + (empty) tree tree + index+ tree tree + index+ index index+ + +Two-way merge +------------- + +It is permitted for the index to lack an entry; this does not prevent +any case from applying. + +If the index exists, it is an error for it not to match either the old +or the result. + +If multiple cases apply, the one used is listed first. + +A result which changes the index is an error if the index is not empty +and not up to date. + +Entries marked '+' have stat information. Spaces marked '*' don't +affect the result. + + case index old new result + ------------------------------------- + 0/2 (empty) * (empty) (empty) + 1/3 (empty) * new new + 4/5 index+ (empty) (empty) index+ + 6/7 index+ (empty) index index+ + 10 index+ index (empty) (empty) + 14/15 index+ old old index+ + 18/19 index+ old index index+ + 20 index+ index new new + +Three-way merge +--------------- + +It is permitted for the index to lack an entry; this does not prevent +any case from applying. + +If the index exists, it is an error for it not to match either the +head or (if the merge is trivial) the result. + +If multiple cases apply, the one used is listed first. + +A result of "no merge" means that index is left in stage 0, ancest in +stage 1, head in stage 2, and remote in stage 3 (if any of these are +empty, no entry is left for that stage). Otherwise, the given entry is +left in stage 0, and there are no other entries. + +A result of "no merge" is an error if the index is not empty and not +up to date. + +*empty* means that the tree must not have a directory-file conflict + with the entry. + +For multiple ancestors, a '+' means that this case applies even if +only one ancestor or remote fits; a '^' means all of the ancestors +must be the same. + + case ancest head remote result + ---------------------------------------- + 1 (empty)+ (empty) (empty) (empty) + 2ALT (empty)+ *empty* remote remote + 2 (empty)^ (empty) remote no merge + 3ALT (empty)+ head *empty* head + 3 (empty)^ head (empty) no merge + 4 (empty)^ head remote no merge + 5ALT * head head head + 6 ancest+ (empty) (empty) no merge + 8 ancest^ (empty) ancest no merge + 7 ancest+ (empty) remote no merge + 10 ancest^ ancest (empty) no merge + 9 ancest+ head (empty) no merge + 16 anc1/anc2 anc1 anc2 no merge + 13 ancest+ head ancest head + 14 ancest+ ancest remote remote + 11 ancest+ head remote no merge + +Only #2ALT and #3ALT use *empty*, because these are the only cases +where there can be conflicts that didn't exist before. Note that we +allow directory-file conflicts between things in different stages +after the trivial merge. + +A possible alternative for #6 is (empty), which would make it like +#1. This is not used, due to the likelihood that it arises due to +moving the file to multiple different locations or moving and deleting +it in different branches. + +Case #1 is included for completeness, and also in case we decide to +put on '+' markings; any path that is never mentioned at all isn't +handled. + +Note that #16 is when both #13 and #14 apply; in this case, we refuse +the trivial merge, because we can't tell from this data which is +right. This is a case of a reverted patch (in some direction, maybe +multiple times), and the right answer depends on looking at crossings +of history or common ancestors of the ancestors. + +Note that, between #6, #7, #9, and #11, all cases not otherwise +covered are handled in this table. + +For #8 and #10, there is alternative behavior, not currently +implemented, where the result is (empty). As currently implemented, +the automatic merge will generally give this effect. |