From ae1c76ff830d146d41e88d6fba724c0a54bce868 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 19:45:20 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 1:43.6. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- docs/CONTRIBUTING.md | 212 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ docs/HACKING.md | 291 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ docs/MAINTAINERS.md | 62 +++++++++++ 3 files changed, 565 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/CONTRIBUTING.md create mode 100644 docs/HACKING.md create mode 100644 docs/MAINTAINERS.md (limited to 'docs') diff --git a/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md b/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..697e84c --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -0,0 +1,212 @@ +# Contributing + +When contributing to the development of GNOME Settings, please first discuss the change you wish to +make via issue, email, or any other method with the maintainers before making a change. + +Please note we have a Code of Conduct, please follow it in all your interactions with the project. + +## Pull Request Process + +1. Create a fork in GitLab and push your work to there +2. Open a Merge Request + 1. Always allow maintainer edits + 2. Mark the Merge Request as WIP if your work is not ready to be reviewed +3. Assign the correct maintainer to the Merge Request (see [`MAINTAINERS.md`][maintainers] to select + the correct maintainer) +4. Format commit messages as follows: + ``` + component: + ‌ + A paragraph explaining the problem and its context. + ‌ + Another one explaining how you solved that. + ‌ + + ``` +4. You may merge the pull request in once you have the sign-off of the maintainers, or if you + do not have permission to do that, you may request the second reviewer to merge it for you. + +## Code of Conduct + +GNOME Settings is a project developed based on GNOME Code of Conduct and GitHub's community +guidelines. You can read it below: + +### Summary + +GNOME creates software for a better world. We achieve this by behaving well towards +each other. + +Therefore this document suggests what we consider ideal behaviour, so you know what +to expect when getting involved in GNOME. This is who we are and what we want to be. +There is no official enforcement of these principles, and this should not be interpreted +like a legal document. + +### Advice + + * **Be respectful and considerate**: Disagreement is no excuse for poor behaviour or personal + attacks. Remember that a community where people feel uncomfortable is not a productive one. + + * **Be patient and generous**: If someone asks for help it is because they need it. Do politely + suggest specific documentation or more appropriate venues where appropriate, but avoid + aggressive or vague responses such as "RTFM". + + * **Assume people mean well**: Remember that decisions are often a difficult choice between + competing priorities. If you disagree, please do so politely. If something seems outrageous, + check that you did not misinterpret it. Ask for clarification, but do not assume the worst. + + * **Try to be concise**: Avoid repeating what has been said already. Making a conversation larger + makes it difficult to follow, and people often feel personally attacked if they receive multiple + messages telling them the same thing. + + +In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as +contributors and maintainers pledge to making participation in our project and +our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body +size, disability, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, level of experience, +nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and +orientation. + +### Communication Guidelines + +It is of ultimate importance to maintain a community in which everyone feels free to express +themselves, review, and comment on each others ideas, both technical and otherwise. Correspondingly, +an environment in which individuals are silenced, berated, or are otherwise afraid to speak up is +unlikely to foster fruitful dialog. + +Everyone interacting with members of the community should always keep in mind the asymmetry of +communication: while your interaction with community members (and in particular, maintainers and +long-term contributors) may be singular and fleeting, these members generally interact with a high +volume of individuals each day. Before writing a comment, opening a new issue, or engaging as part +of any forum or IRC discussion, please take a moment to appreciate that fact. + +While communicating, it is expected that all involved participants be respectful and civil at all +times and refrain from personal attacks. + +#### Communication Rules + +The following behavior will not be tolerated on any occasion: + + * **Threats of violence**: You may not threaten violence towards others or use the site to organize, + promote, or incite acts of real-world violence or terrorism. Think carefully about the words you + use, the images you post, and even the software you write, and how they may be interpreted by + others. Even if you mean something as a joke, it might not be received that way. If you think + that someone else might interpret the content you post as a threat or as promoting violence or + terrorism, stop. Don't post it. In extraordinary cases, we may report threats of violence to law + enforcement if we think there may be a genuine risk of physical harm or a threat to public safety. + + * **Hate speech and discrimination**: While it is not forbidden to broach topics such as age, body + size, disability, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, level of experience, nationality, + personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation, we do not tolerate speech + that attacks a person or group of people on the basis of who they are. When approached in an + aggressive or insulting manner these (and other) sensitive topics can make others feel unwelcome, + or perhaps even unsafe. While there's always the potential for misunderstandings, we expect our + community members to remain respectful and civil when discussing sensitive topics. + + * **Bullying and harassment**: We do not tolerate bullying, harassment, or any other means of + habitual badgering or intimidation targeted at a specific person or group of people. In general, + if your actions are unwanted and you cease to terminate this form of engagement, there is a good + chance that your behavior will be classified as bullying or harassment. + + * **Impersonation**: You may not seek to mislead others as to your identity by copying another + person's avatar, posting content under their email address, using a similar username, or otherwise + posing as someone else. Impersonation and identity theft is a form of harassment. + + * **Doxxing and invasion of privacy**: Don't post other people's personal information, such as phone + numbers, private email addresses, physical addresses, credit card numbers, Social Security/National + Identity numbers, or passwords. Depending on the context, we may consider such behavior to be an + invasion of privacy, with particularly egregious examples potentially escalating to the point of + legal action, such as when the released material presents a safety risk to the subject. + + * **Obscene content**: In essence, do not post pornography, gore, or any other depiction of violence. + +#### General Advice + +The following advice will help to increase the efficiency of communication with community members: + + * Do not post "me too" comments. Use the GitLab reactions instead, e.g. “thumbs up” or “thumbs down”. + * Avoid adding priority, time, or relevance hints if you are not involved with the development of + the application. For example, `“This is an urgent issue”`, or `“This should be fixed now”`, or + even `“The majority of users need this feature”`. + * Do not use passive-aggressive communication tactics. + * When reporting technical problems with the application, such as misbehavior or crashes, focus on + sharing as many details as possible and avoid adding non-technical information to it. + + An example of a **good** issue report: + + ``` + GNOME Settings crashes when opening the Wi-Fi panel with 3+ Wi-Fi adapters + + Steps to reproduce (assuming 3+ Wi-Fi adapters are present): + + 1. Open GNOME Settings + 2. Select the Wi-Fi panel + 3. Observe the crash + + This does not happen with 2 or less adapters. Here is a backtrace of the + crash: backtrace.txt + ``` + + In contrast, here is an example of a **bad** issue report: + + ``` + GNOME Settings crashed while I was trying to connect to the internet. How can such + a thing happen and nobody notice? Did you not test it before releasing it? + + This should be fixed as quick as possible! + ``` + + * When asking for new features, try and add as much information as possible to justify its relevance, + why should it not be implemented as an auxiliary program, what problems it would solve, and offer + suggestions about how you think it should be implemented. + + Example of a **good** feature request: + + ``` + GNOME Settings needs to expose IPv6 options + + As of now, the connection editor dialog does not allow editing various IPv6 + options. This is relevant because without some of these options, it is not + possible to have a valid IPv6 configuration and, consequently, not have access + to various websites and services. + + The list of missing configurations that are essential is: + + * + * + + Optionally, the following configurations can also be added: + + * + * + + Here is a quick sketch I have made showing how I think these options + should be exposed as a user interface: sketch.png. + ``` + + Example of a **bad** feature request: + + ``` + Merge GNOME Tweaks in GNOME Settings + + The options in GNOME Tweaks are absolutely essential to the majority of us + users. Why was it not merged already? This is an urgent issue and should + have been addressed years ago. You should allocate all your resources on + merging those two applications. + ``` + +#### What happens if someone breaks these rules or guidelines? + +Actions that may be taken in response to an abusive comment include but are not limited to: + + * Content removal (when breaking any of the guidelines or rules) + * Content blocking (when breaking any of the guidelines or rules) + * Formal report to the Code of Conduct Committee (when breaking any of the rules) + +### Attribution + +This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, +available at [http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4][version] + +[homepage]: http://contributor-covenant.org +[version]: http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/ +[maintainers]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/blob/main/docs/MAINTAINERS.md diff --git a/docs/HACKING.md b/docs/HACKING.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a60e206 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/HACKING.md @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@ +# Style + +GNOME Settings has a coding style based on GTK Coding Style, but with a few more +rules. Please read them carefully and, if in doubt, ask a maintainer for directions. + +## General + +The most important rule is: **see the surrounding code, and copy its style**. + +That said, GNOME Settings assumes: + + * 2 spaces of indentation + * 120 columns of line width + * Newline before `{` + +Another rule that applies to function declarations is that all parameters are +aligned by the last '*'. There are plenty of examples below. + +## Comments + +Comment blocks should be formatted as following: + +```c +/* Single line comment */ + +/* Multiline comments start at the first line of the comment block, + * but have the closing slash a line after. Every line starts with + * an asterisk that is aligned with every the rest of the block. + */ +``` + +## Conditionals + +Conditionals should either be all in one line, or one per line. Newlines inside +conditionals are aligned by the last parenthesis. + + +Some examples below: + +```c +// Single line if +if (a || b || (c && d)) + return; + +// Multiline if with nested parenthesis +if (long_boolean_variable_used_in_this_condition_a || + long_boolean_variable_used_in_this_condition_b || + (long_boolean_variable_used_in_this_condition_c && + long_boolean_variable_used_in_this_condition_d)) + { + return; + } + +// Another single line example with do {} while (...) +do + { + /* something */ + } +while (a || b || (c && d)); +``` + +## Structs and Enums + +Structures and enums are formatted as following: + +```c +struct _FooBar +{ + guint32 field_one; + gchar *text; +}; + +typedef struct +{ + FooParent parent; + + guint32 field_one; + gchar *text; + + struct + { + CustomType *something; + guint something_else; + } inner_struct; + + gboolean flag : 1; +} FooBar; + +enum +{ + FIRST, + SECOND, + LAST, +}; + +typedef enum +{ + FOO_BAR_FIRST, + FOO_BAR_SECOND, + FOO_BAR_LAST, +} FooEnumBar; +``` + +## Header (.h) files + +It is organized by the following structure: + + 1. GPL header + 2. Local includes + 3. System includes + 4. `G_BEGIN_DECLS` + 5. `#defines` + 6. `G_DECLARE_{FINAL,DERIVABLE}_TYPE` + 7. Public API + 8. `G_END_DECLS` + +The following style rules apply: + + * The '*' and the type come together, without any spaces in between. + * Function names are aligned by the widest return value. + * Parenthesis after function name is aligned by the widest function name + * The last '*' in parameters are aligned by the widest parameter type + * No new line at the end of the file + +As an example, this is how a header file should look like (extracted from +the `cc-object-storage.h` file): + +```c +/* cc-object-storage.h + * + * Copyright 2018 Georges Basile Stavracas Neto + * + * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by + * the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the License, or + * (at your option) any later version. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + * along with this program. If not, see . + */ + +#pragma once + +#include +#include + +G_BEGIN_DECLS + +/* Default storage keys */ +#define CC_OBJECT_NMCLIENT "CcObjectStorage::nm-client" + + +#define CC_TYPE_OBJECT_STORAGE (cc_object_storage_get_type()) + +G_DECLARE_FINAL_TYPE (CcObjectStorage, cc_object_storage, CC, OBJECT_STORAGE, GObject) + +gboolean cc_object_storage_has_object (const gchar *key); + +void cc_object_storage_add_object (const gchar *key, + gpointer object); + +gpointer cc_object_storage_get_object (const gchar *key); + +gpointer cc_object_storage_create_dbus_proxy_sync (GBusType bus_type, + GDBusProxyFlags flags, + const gchar *name, + const gchar *path, + const gchar *interface, + GCancellable *cancellable, + GError **error); + +void cc_object_storage_create_dbus_proxy (GBusType bus_type, + GDBusProxyFlags flags, + const gchar *name, + const gchar *path, + const gchar *interface, + GCancellable *cancellable, + GAsyncReadyCallback callback, + gpointer user_data); + +G_END_DECLS +``` + +## Source code + +The source file keeps an order of methods. The order will be as following: + + 1. GPL header + 2. Structures + 3. Function prototypes + 4. G_DEFINE_TYPE() + 5. Enums + 6. Static variables + 7. Auxiliary methods + 8. Callbacks + 9. Interface implementations + 10. Parent class overrides + 11. class_init and init + 12. Public API + +### Structures + +The structures must have the first pointer asterisk aligned one space after the +widest type name. For example: + +```c +typedef struct +{ + GBusType bus_type; + GDBusProxyFlags flags; + gchar *name; + gchar *path; + gchar *interface; + gboolean cached; +} TaskData; + +``` + +### Function Prototypes + +Function prototypes must be formatted just like in header files. + +### Auxiliary Methods + +Auxiliary method names must have a verb in the dictionary form, and should always +perform an action over something. They don't have the `cc_` prefix. For example: + +```c +static void +execute_something_on_data (Foo *data, + Bar *bar) +{ + /* ... */ +} +``` + +### Callbacks + + * Callbacks always have the `_cb` suffix + * Signal callbacks always have the `on_` prefix + * Callback names must have the name of the signal in the past + +For example: + +```c +static void +on_foo_size_allocated_cb (GtkWidget *widget, + GtkAllocation *allocation, + gpointer user_data) +{ + /* ... */ +} +``` + +### Line Splitting + +Line splitting works following the GTK code style, but legibility comes over above +all. If a function call looks unbalanced following the GTK style, it is fine to +slightly escape the rules. + +For example, this feels extremelly unbalanced: + +```c +foo_bar_do_somthing_sync (a, + 1, + object, + data, + something + cancellable, + &error); +``` + +Notice the empty space before the arguments, and how empty and odd it looks. In +comparison, it will look better if written like this: + +```c +foo_bar_do_somthing_sync (a, 1, object, data, + something + cancellable, + &error); +``` + +# Contributing guidelines + +See CONTRIBUTIONS.md file for the contribution guidelines, and the Code of Conduct +that contributors are expected to follow. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/docs/MAINTAINERS.md b/docs/MAINTAINERS.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..67fe470 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/MAINTAINERS.md @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +This document describes how maintainership works on GNOME Settings. It is intended to be a guideline +for future reference. + +The list of current maintainers can be found at the [gnome-control-center.doap][doap] DOAP file. + +# General Rules + +The purpose of the shared maintainership model in GNOME Settings is to avoid as much as possible +pushing unreviewed code in the main repository. Not only it is a good engineering practice, but it +also increases the code quality and reduces the number of bugs. + +GNOME Settings has two types of maintainers: + + * **General Maintainer**: take care of the whole codebase and of panels without a specific maintainer. + * **Panel Maintainer**: take care of a specific panel with a stronger authority over General + Maintainers. + + +## For Contributors + +Panel Maintainers have a stronger authority over their panels than a General Maintainer. If you are +contributing to a specific panel, and that panel has a dedicate maintainer, they should be the main +point of contact. + +In the rare case of Panel Maintainers not being responsive, it is allowed to contact General +Maintainers. + +## For Maintainers + +If you are a Panel Maintainer, your merge requests will be reviewed by General Maintainer. The +opposite is true as well - General Maintainers contributing to a specific panel will have their +merge requests reviewed by the Panel Maintainer of that panel. + +If you are a General Maintainer contributing to an unmaintained panel, or to the main codebase, your +merge requests will be reviewed by another General Maintainer. + +Avoid pushing commits without an explicit review, except in the following cases: + + * The commit is a translation commit + * The commit is trivial + * The commit is urgent and no reviewers were available in time + +When accepting a merge request and allowing the other maintainer to merge, avoid misunderstandings +by being explicit. Suggested acceptance phrase: + +`I approve this merge request. You are allowed to merge it.` + +### Urgency Commits + +Urgency commits should never happen, but in case they're needed, they are defined by the following +criteria: + + * On stable branches (or `main` right after a stable release) + * Symptoms: + * Always OR often reproducible; AND + * Crash; OR + * Data loss; OR + * System corruption + * Quickly followed by an emergency release (at most 2 days after the commit) + + +[doap]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/blob/main/gnome-control-center.doap -- cgit v1.2.3