From ca67b09c015d4af3ae3cce12aa72e60941dbb8b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 18:29:52 +0200 Subject: Adding debian version 2.06-13+deb12u1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- ...-grub_font_blit_glyph-and-grub_font_blit_.patch | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+) create mode 100644 debian/patches/cve_2022_2601/0012-font-Harden-grub_font_blit_glyph-and-grub_font_blit_.patch (limited to 'debian/patches/cve_2022_2601/0012-font-Harden-grub_font_blit_glyph-and-grub_font_blit_.patch') diff --git a/debian/patches/cve_2022_2601/0012-font-Harden-grub_font_blit_glyph-and-grub_font_blit_.patch b/debian/patches/cve_2022_2601/0012-font-Harden-grub_font_blit_glyph-and-grub_font_blit_.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6296bf5 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/cve_2022_2601/0012-font-Harden-grub_font_blit_glyph-and-grub_font_blit_.patch @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +From fcd7aa0c278f7cf3fb9f93f1a3966e1792339eb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Zhang Boyang +Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 07:15:41 +0800 +Subject: [PATCH 12/14] font: Harden grub_font_blit_glyph() and + grub_font_blit_glyph_mirror() + +As a mitigation and hardening measure add sanity checks to +grub_font_blit_glyph() and grub_font_blit_glyph_mirror(). This patch +makes these two functions do nothing if target blitting area isn't fully +contained in target bitmap. Therefore, if complex calculations in caller +overflows and malicious coordinates are given, we are still safe because +any coordinates which result in out-of-bound-write are rejected. However, +this patch only checks for invalid coordinates, and doesn't provide any +protection against invalid source glyph or destination glyph, e.g. +mismatch between glyph size and buffer size. + +This hardening measure is designed to mitigate possible overflows in +blit_comb(). If overflow occurs, it may return invalid bounding box +during dry run and call grub_font_blit_glyph() with malicious +coordinates during actual blitting. However, we are still safe because +the scratch glyph itself is valid, although its size makes no sense, and +any invalid coordinates are rejected. + +It would be better to call grub_fatal() if illegal parameter is detected. +However, doing this may end up in a dangerous recursion because grub_fatal() +would print messages to the screen and we are in the progress of drawing +characters on the screen. + +Reported-by: Daniel Axtens +Signed-off-by: Zhang Boyang +Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper +--- + grub-core/font/font.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ + 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) + +diff --git a/grub-core/font/font.c b/grub-core/font/font.c +index 3d3d803e8..cf15dc2f9 100644 +--- a/grub-core/font/font.c ++++ b/grub-core/font/font.c +@@ -1069,8 +1069,15 @@ static void + grub_font_blit_glyph (struct grub_font_glyph *target, + struct grub_font_glyph *src, unsigned dx, unsigned dy) + { ++ grub_uint16_t max_x, max_y; + unsigned src_bit, tgt_bit, src_byte, tgt_byte; + unsigned i, j; ++ ++ /* Harden against out-of-bound writes. */ ++ if ((grub_add (dx, src->width, &max_x) || max_x > target->width) || ++ (grub_add (dy, src->height, &max_y) || max_y > target->height)) ++ return; ++ + for (i = 0; i < src->height; i++) + { + src_bit = (src->width * i) % 8; +@@ -1102,9 +1109,16 @@ grub_font_blit_glyph_mirror (struct grub_font_glyph *target, + struct grub_font_glyph *src, + unsigned dx, unsigned dy) + { ++ grub_uint16_t max_x, max_y; + unsigned tgt_bit, src_byte, tgt_byte; + signed src_bit; + unsigned i, j; ++ ++ /* Harden against out-of-bound writes. */ ++ if ((grub_add (dx, src->width, &max_x) || max_x > target->width) || ++ (grub_add (dy, src->height, &max_y) || max_y > target->height)) ++ return; ++ + for (i = 0; i < src->height; i++) + { + src_bit = (src->width * i + src->width - 1) % 8; +-- +2.30.2 + -- cgit v1.2.3