From ed5640d8b587fbcfed7dd7967f3de04b37a76f26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 11:06:44 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 4:7.4.7. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- compilerplugins/clang/test/unnecessaryparen.cxx | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 143 insertions(+) create mode 100644 compilerplugins/clang/test/unnecessaryparen.cxx (limited to 'compilerplugins/clang/test/unnecessaryparen.cxx') diff --git a/compilerplugins/clang/test/unnecessaryparen.cxx b/compilerplugins/clang/test/unnecessaryparen.cxx new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ccc2b4ce6 --- /dev/null +++ b/compilerplugins/clang/test/unnecessaryparen.cxx @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +/* -*- Mode: C++; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 4; fill-column: 100 -*- */ +/* + * This file is part of the LibreOffice project. + * + * This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public + * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this + * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#define MACRO (1) + +bool foo(int); + +enum class EFoo { Bar }; + +struct S { operator bool(); }; + +enum class BrowseMode +{ + Modules = 0x01, + Top = 0x02, + Bottom = 0x04, + Left = 0x08, +}; +namespace o3tl +{ +template <> struct typed_flags : is_typed_flags +{ +}; +} + +int main() +{ + int x = 1; + x = ((2)); // expected-error {{parentheses around parentheses [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + + if ((foo(1))) foo(2); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside if statement [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + + foo((1)); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside single-arg call [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + + int y = (x); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside vardecl statement [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + (void)y; + + EFoo efoo = EFoo::Bar; + switch (efoo) { + case (EFoo::Bar): break; // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside case statement [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + } + + int z = (y) ? 1 : 0; // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around identifier [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + (void)z; + + int v1 = (static_cast(1)) + 1; // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around cast [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + (void)v1; + + // No warnings, used to silence -Wunreachable-code: + if ((false)) { + return 0; + } + x = (true) ? 0 : 1; + + // More "no warnings", at least potentially used to silence -Wunreachable-code: + while ((false)) { + return 0; + } + for (; (false);) { + return 0; + } + x = foo(0) && (false) ? 0 : 1; + x = MACRO < (0) ? 0 : 1; + // cf. odd Clang -Wunreachable-code--suppression mechanism when the macro itself contains + // parentheses, causing the issue that lead to c421ac3f9432f2e9468d28447dc4c2e45b6f4da3 + // "Revert loplugin:unnecessaryparen warning around integer literals" + + int v2 = (1); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside vardecl statement [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + (void)v2; + + std::string v3; + v3 = (std::string("xx") + "xx"); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside assignment [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + (void)v3; + + S s1; + if ((s1)) { // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside if statement [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + return 0; + } + S s2; + if ((s2 = s1)) { + return 0; + } + + (void) sizeof (int); + (void) sizeof (x); // expect no warning (for whatever reason; for symmetry with above case?) + + // Expecting just one error, not reported twice during TraverseInitListExpr: + int a[] = {(x)}; // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around identifier [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + (void) a; + + (void) (+1); // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around signed numeric literal [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + (void) (-1); // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around signed numeric literal [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + + // For simplicity's sake, even warn about pathological cases that would require adding + // whitespace when removing the parentheses (as is also necessary in other cases anyway, like + // "throw(x);"); it is unlikely that there are any actual occurrences of code like "-(-1)" that + // would benefit from the parentheses readability-wise, compared to "- -1": + (void) -(-1); // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around signed numeric literal [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + + char *p = nullptr; + delete (p); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside delete expr [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + + BrowseMode nBits = ( BrowseMode::Modules | BrowseMode::Top ); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside vardecl statement [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + (void)nBits; + + OUString::number((v2+1)); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside single-arg call [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} +}; + +struct B { operator bool() const; }; + +struct N { bool operator !(); }; + +class Foo2 +{ + int* p; + B b; + N n; + + int foo2() + { + return (p) ? 1 : 0; // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around member expr [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}} + } + + static int foo3(Foo2 & foo) { + (void) !(foo.p); + (void) !(foo.b); + (void) !(foo.n); + return (foo.p) ? 1 : 0; + } +}; + +/* vim:set shiftwidth=4 softtabstop=4 expandtab cinoptions=b1,g0,N-s cinkeys+=0=break: */ -- cgit v1.2.3