Adding upstream version 6.1.76.upstream/6.1.76upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

14 files changed, 2583 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..45ce04823
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+=============
+API Reference
+=============
+.. toctree::
+
+	test
+	resource
+
+This section documents the KUnit kernel testing API. It is divided into the
+following sections:
+
+Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst
+
+ - documents all of the standard testing API
+
+Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst
+
+ - documents the KUnit resource API
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0a94f8312
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+============
+Resource API
+============
+
+This file documents the KUnit resource API.
+
+Most users won't need to use this API directly, power users can use it to store
+state on a per-test basis, register custom cleanup actions, and more.
+
+.. kernel-doc:: include/kunit/resource.h
+   :internal:
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c5eca423e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+========
+Test API
+========
+
+This file documents all of the standard testing API.
+
+.. kernel-doc:: include/kunit/test.h
+   :internal:
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8efe792bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+==================
+KUnit Architecture
+==================
+
+The KUnit architecture can be divided into two parts:
+
+- `In-Kernel Testing Framework`_
+- `kunit_tool (Command Line Test Harness)`_
+
+In-Kernel Testing Framework
+===========================
+
+The kernel testing library supports KUnit tests written in C using
+KUnit. KUnit tests are kernel code. KUnit does several things:
+
+- Organizes tests
+- Reports test results
+- Provides test utilities
+
+Test Cases
+----------
+
+The fundamental unit in KUnit is the test case. The KUnit test cases are
+grouped into KUnit suites. A KUnit test case is a function with type
+signature ``void (*)(struct kunit *test)``.
+These test case functions are wrapped in a struct called
+struct kunit_case.
+
+.. note:
+	``generate_params`` is optional for non-parameterized tests.
+
+Each KUnit test case gets a ``struct kunit`` context
+object passed to it that tracks a running test. The KUnit assertion
+macros and other KUnit utilities use the ``struct kunit`` context
+object. As an exception, there are two fields:
+
+- ``->priv``: The setup functions can use it to store arbitrary test
+  user data.
+
+- ``->param_value``: It contains the parameter value which can be
+  retrieved in the parameterized tests.
+
+Test Suites
+-----------
+
+A KUnit suite includes a collection of test cases. The KUnit suites
+are represented by the ``struct kunit_suite``. For example:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	static struct kunit_case example_test_cases[] = {
+		KUNIT_CASE(example_test_foo),
+		KUNIT_CASE(example_test_bar),
+		KUNIT_CASE(example_test_baz),
+		{}
+	};
+
+	static struct kunit_suite example_test_suite = {
+		.name = "example",
+		.init = example_test_init,
+		.exit = example_test_exit,
+		.test_cases = example_test_cases,
+	};
+	kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite);
+
+In the above example, the test suite ``example_test_suite``, runs the
+test cases ``example_test_foo``, ``example_test_bar``, and
+``example_test_baz``. Before running the test, the ``example_test_init``
+is called and after running the test, ``example_test_exit`` is called.
+The ``kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite)`` registers the test suite
+with the KUnit test framework.
+
+Executor
+--------
+
+The KUnit executor can list and run built-in KUnit tests on boot.
+The Test suites are stored in a linker section
+called ``.kunit_test_suites``. For code, see:
+https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h?h=v5.15#n945.
+The linker section consists of an array of pointers to
+``struct kunit_suite``, and is populated by the ``kunit_test_suites()``
+macro. To run all tests compiled into the kernel, the KUnit executor
+iterates over the linker section array.
+
+.. kernel-figure:: kunit_suitememorydiagram.svg
+	:alt:	KUnit Suite Memory
+
+	KUnit Suite Memory Diagram
+
+On the kernel boot, the KUnit executor uses the start and end addresses
+of this section to iterate over and run all tests. For code, see:
+https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/kunit/executor.c
+
+When built as a module, the ``kunit_test_suites()`` macro defines a
+``module_init()`` function, which runs all the tests in the compilation
+unit instead of utilizing the executor.
+
+In KUnit tests, some error classes do not affect other tests
+or parts of the kernel, each KUnit case executes in a separate thread
+context. For code, see:
+https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/kunit/try-catch.c?h=v5.15#n58
+
+Assertion Macros
+----------------
+
+KUnit tests verify state using expectations/assertions.
+All expectations/assertions are formatted as:
+``KUNIT_{EXPECT|ASSERT}_<op>[_MSG](kunit, property[, message])``
+
+- ``{EXPECT|ASSERT}`` determines whether the check is an assertion or an
+  expectation.
+
+	- For an expectation, if the check fails, marks the test as failed
+	  and logs the failure.
+
+	- An assertion, on failure, causes the test case to terminate
+	  immediately.
+
+		- Assertions call function:
+		  ``void __noreturn kunit_abort(struct kunit *)``.
+
+		- ``kunit_abort`` calls function:
+		  ``void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch)``.
+
+		- ``kunit_try_catch_throw`` calls function:
+		  ``void kthread_complete_and_exit(struct completion *, long) __noreturn;``
+		  and terminates the special thread context.
+
+- ``<op>`` denotes a check with options: ``TRUE`` (supplied property
+  has the boolean value “true”), ``EQ`` (two supplied properties are
+  equal), ``NOT_ERR_OR_NULL`` (supplied pointer is not null and does not
+  contain an “err” value).
+
+- ``[_MSG]`` prints a custom message on failure.
+
+Test Result Reporting
+---------------------
+KUnit prints test results in KTAP format. KTAP is based on TAP14, see:
+https://github.com/isaacs/testanything.github.io/blob/tap14/tap-version-14-specification.md.
+KTAP (yet to be standardized format) works with KUnit and Kselftest.
+The KUnit executor prints KTAP results to dmesg, and debugfs
+(if configured).
+
+Parameterized Tests
+-------------------
+
+Each KUnit parameterized test is associated with a collection of
+parameters. The test is invoked multiple times, once for each parameter
+value and the parameter is stored in the ``param_value`` field.
+The test case includes a KUNIT_CASE_PARAM() macro that accepts a
+generator function.
+The generator function is passed the previous parameter and returns the next
+parameter. It also provides a macro to generate common-case generators based on
+arrays.
+
+kunit_tool (Command Line Test Harness)
+======================================
+
+kunit_tool is a Python script ``(tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py)``
+that can be used to configure, build, exec, parse and run (runs other
+commands in order) test results. You can either run KUnit tests using
+kunit_tool or can include KUnit in kernel and parse manually.
+
+- ``configure`` command generates the kernel ``.config`` from a
+  ``.kunitconfig`` file (and any architecture-specific options).
+  For some architectures, additional config options are specified in the
+  ``qemu_config`` Python script
+  (For example: ``tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/powerpc.py``).
+  It parses both the existing ``.config`` and the ``.kunitconfig`` files
+  and ensures that ``.config`` is a superset of ``.kunitconfig``.
+  If this is not the case, it will combine the two and run
+  ``make olddefconfig`` to regenerate the ``.config`` file. It then
+  verifies that ``.config`` is now a superset. This checks if all
+  Kconfig dependencies are correctly specified in ``.kunitconfig``.
+  ``kunit_config.py`` includes the parsing Kconfigs code. The code which
+  runs ``make olddefconfig`` is a part of ``kunit_kernel.py``. You can
+  invoke this command via: ``./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config`` and
+  generate a ``.config`` file.
+- ``build`` runs ``make`` on the kernel tree with required options
+  (depends on the architecture and some options, for example: build_dir)
+  and reports any errors.
+  To build a KUnit kernel from the current ``.config``, you can use the
+  ``build`` argument: ``./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build``.
+- ``exec`` command executes kernel results either directly (using
+  User-mode Linux configuration), or via an emulator such
+  as QEMU. It reads results from the log via standard
+  output (stdout), and passes them to ``parse`` to be parsed.
+  If you already have built a kernel with built-in KUnit tests,
+  you can run the kernel and display the test results with the ``exec``
+  argument: ``./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec``.
+- ``parse`` extracts the KTAP output from a kernel log, parses
+  the test results, and prints a summary. For failed tests, any
+  diagnostic output will be included.
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fae426f26
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+==========================
+Frequently Asked Questions
+==========================
+
+How is this different from Autotest, kselftest, and so on?
+==========================================================
+KUnit is a unit testing framework. Autotest, kselftest (and some others) are
+not.
+
+A `unit test <https://martinfowler.com/bliki/UnitTest.html>`_ is supposed to
+test a single unit of code in isolation and hence the name *unit test*. A unit
+test should be the finest granularity of testing and should allow all possible
+code paths to be tested in the code under test. This is only possible if the
+code under test is small and does not have any external dependencies outside of
+the test's control like hardware.
+
+There are no testing frameworks currently available for the kernel that do not
+require installing the kernel on a test machine or in a virtual machine. All
+testing frameworks require tests to be written in userspace and run on the
+kernel under test. This is true for Autotest, kselftest, and some others,
+disqualifying any of them from being considered unit testing frameworks.
+
+Does KUnit support running on architectures other than UML?
+===========================================================
+
+Yes, mostly.
+
+For the most part, the KUnit core framework (what we use to write the tests)
+can compile to any architecture. It compiles like just another part of the
+kernel and runs when the kernel boots, or when built as a module, when the
+module is loaded.  However, there is infrastructure, like the KUnit Wrapper
+(``tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py``) that might not support some architectures
+(see :ref:`kunit-on-qemu`).
+
+In short, yes, you can run KUnit on other architectures, but it might require
+more work than using KUnit on UML.
+
+For more information, see :ref:`kunit-on-non-uml`.
+
+.. _kinds-of-tests:
+
+What is the difference between a unit test and other kinds of tests?
+====================================================================
+Most existing tests for the Linux kernel would be categorized as an integration
+test, or an end-to-end test.
+
+- A unit test is supposed to test a single unit of code in isolation. A unit
+  test should be the finest granularity of testing and, as such, allows all
+  possible code paths to be tested in the code under test. This is only possible
+  if the code under test is small and does not have any external dependencies
+  outside of the test's control like hardware.
+- An integration test tests the interaction between a minimal set of components,
+  usually just two or three. For example, someone might write an integration
+  test to test the interaction between a driver and a piece of hardware, or to
+  test the interaction between the userspace libraries the kernel provides and
+  the kernel itself. However, one of these tests would probably not test the
+  entire kernel along with hardware interactions and interactions with the
+  userspace.
+- An end-to-end test usually tests the entire system from the perspective of the
+  code under test. For example, someone might write an end-to-end test for the
+  kernel by installing a production configuration of the kernel on production
+  hardware with a production userspace and then trying to exercise some behavior
+  that depends on interactions between the hardware, the kernel, and userspace.
+
+KUnit is not working, what should I do?
+=======================================
+
+Unfortunately, there are a number of things which can break, but here are some
+things to try.
+
+1. Run ``./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run`` with the ``--raw_output``
+   parameter. This might show details or error messages hidden by the kunit_tool
+   parser.
+2. Instead of running ``kunit.py run``, try running ``kunit.py config``,
+   ``kunit.py build``, and ``kunit.py exec`` independently. This can help track
+   down where an issue is occurring. (If you think the parser is at fault, you
+   can run it manually against ``stdin`` or a file with ``kunit.py parse``.)
+3. Running the UML kernel directly can often reveal issues or error messages,
+   ``kunit_tool`` ignores. This should be as simple as running ``./vmlinux``
+   after building the UML kernel (for example, by using ``kunit.py build``).
+   Note that UML has some unusual requirements (such as the host having a tmpfs
+   filesystem mounted), and has had issues in the past when built statically and
+   the host has KASLR enabled. (On older host kernels, you may need to run
+   ``setarch `uname -m` -R ./vmlinux`` to disable KASLR.)
+4. Make sure the kernel .config has ``CONFIG_KUNIT=y`` and at least one test
+   (e.g. ``CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=y``). kunit_tool will keep its .config
+   around, so you can see what config was used after running ``kunit.py run``.
+   It also preserves any config changes you might make, so you can
+   enable/disable things with ``make ARCH=um menuconfig`` or similar, and then
+   re-run kunit_tool.
+5. Try to run ``make ARCH=um defconfig`` before running ``kunit.py run``. This
+   may help clean up any residual config items which could be causing problems.
+6. Finally, try running KUnit outside UML. KUnit and KUnit tests can be
+   built into any kernel, or can be built as a module and loaded at runtime.
+   Doing so should allow you to determine if UML is causing the issue you're
+   seeing. When tests are built-in, they will execute when the kernel boots, and
+   modules will automatically execute associated tests when loaded. Test results
+   can be collected from ``/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test suite>/results``, and
+   can be parsed with ``kunit.py parse``. For more details, see :ref:`kunit-on-qemu`.
+
+If none of the above tricks help, you are always welcome to email any issues to
+kunit-dev@googlegroups.com.
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f5d13f1d3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+=================================
+KUnit - Linux Kernel Unit Testing
+=================================
+
+.. toctree::
+	:maxdepth: 2
+	:caption: Contents:
+
+	start
+	architecture
+	run_wrapper
+	run_manual
+	usage
+	api/index
+	style
+	faq
+	tips
+	running_tips
+
+This section details the kernel unit testing framework.
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+KUnit (Kernel unit testing framework) provides a common framework for
+unit tests within the Linux kernel. Using KUnit, you can define groups
+of test cases called test suites. The tests either run on kernel boot
+if built-in, or load as a module. KUnit automatically flags and reports
+failed test cases in the kernel log. The test results appear in
+:doc:`KTAP (Kernel - Test Anything Protocol) format</dev-tools/ktap>`.
+It is inspired by JUnit, Python’s unittest.mock, and GoogleTest/GoogleMock
+(C++ unit testing framework).
+
+KUnit tests are part of the kernel, written in the C (programming)
+language, and test parts of the Kernel implementation (example: a C
+language function). Excluding build time, from invocation to
+completion, KUnit can run around 100 tests in less than 10 seconds.
+KUnit can test any kernel component, for example: file system, system
+calls, memory management, device drivers and so on.
+
+KUnit follows the white-box testing approach. The test has access to
+internal system functionality. KUnit runs in kernel space and is not
+restricted to things exposed to user-space.
+
+In addition, KUnit has kunit_tool, a script (``tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py``)
+that configures the Linux kernel, runs KUnit tests under QEMU or UML
+(:doc:`User Mode Linux </virt/uml/user_mode_linux_howto_v2>`),
+parses the test results and
+displays them in a user friendly manner.
+
+Features
+--------
+
+- Provides a framework for writing unit tests.
+- Runs tests on any kernel architecture.
+- Runs a test in milliseconds.
+
+Prerequisites
+-------------
+
+- Any Linux kernel compatible hardware.
+- For Kernel under test, Linux kernel version 5.5 or greater.
+
+Unit Testing
+============
+
+A unit test tests a single unit of code in isolation. A unit test is the finest
+granularity of testing and allows all possible code paths to be tested in the
+code under test. This is possible if the code under test is small and does not
+have any external dependencies outside of the test's control like hardware.
+
+
+Write Unit Tests
+----------------
+
+To write good unit tests, there is a simple but powerful pattern:
+Arrange-Act-Assert. This is a great way to structure test cases and
+defines an order of operations.
+
+- Arrange inputs and targets: At the start of the test, arrange the data
+  that allows a function to work. Example: initialize a statement or
+  object.
+- Act on the target behavior: Call your function/code under test.
+- Assert expected outcome: Verify that the result (or resulting state) is as
+  expected.
+
+Unit Testing Advantages
+-----------------------
+
+- Increases testing speed and development in the long run.
+- Detects bugs at initial stage and therefore decreases bug fix cost
+  compared to acceptance testing.
+- Improves code quality.
+- Encourages writing testable code.
+
+Read also :ref:`kinds-of-tests`.
+
+How do I use it?
+================
+
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst - for KUnit new users.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst - KUnit architecture.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst - run kunit_tool.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst - run tests without kunit_tool.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst - write tests.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst - best practices with
+    examples.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst - KUnit APIs
+    used for testing.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst - KUnit common questions and
+    answers.
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/kunit_suitememorydiagram.svg b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/kunit_suitememorydiagram.svg
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cf8fddc27
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/kunit_suitememorydiagram.svg
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<svg width="796.93" height="555.73" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 796.93 555.73" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
+	<g transform="translate(-13.724 -17.943)">
+		<g fill="#dad4d4" fill-opacity=".91765" stroke="#1a1a1a">
+			<rect x="323.56" y="18.443" width="115.75" height="41.331"/>
+			<rect x="323.56" y="463.09" width="115.75" height="41.331"/>
+			<rect x="323.56" y="531.84" width="115.75" height="41.331"/>
+			<rect x="323.56" y="88.931" width="115.75" height="74.231"/>
+		</g>
+		<g>
+			<rect x="323.56" y="421.76" width="115.75" height="41.331" fill="#b9dbc6" stroke="#1a1a1a"/>
+			<text x="328.00888" y="446.61826" fill="#000000" font-family="sans-serif" font-size="16px" style="line-height:1.25" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="328.00888" y="446.61826" font-family="monospace" font-size="16px">kunit_suite</tspan></text>
+		</g>
+		<g transform="translate(0 -258.6)">
+			<rect x="323.56" y="421.76" width="115.75" height="41.331" fill="#b9dbc6" stroke="#1a1a1a"/>
+			<text x="328.00888" y="446.61826" fill="#000000" font-family="sans-serif" font-size="16px" style="line-height:1.25" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="328.00888" y="446.61826" font-family="monospace" font-size="16px">kunit_suite</tspan></text>
+		</g>
+		<g transform="translate(0 -217.27)">
+			<rect x="323.56" y="421.76" width="115.75" height="41.331" fill="#b9dbc6" stroke="#1a1a1a"/>
+			<text x="328.00888" y="446.61826" fill="#000000" font-family="sans-serif" font-size="16px" style="line-height:1.25" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="328.00888" y="446.61826" font-family="monospace" font-size="16px">kunit_suite</tspan></text>
+		</g>
+		<g transform="translate(0 -175.94)">
+			<rect x="323.56" y="421.76" width="115.75" height="41.331" fill="#b9dbc6" stroke="#1a1a1a"/>
+			<text x="328.00888" y="446.61826" fill="#000000" font-family="sans-serif" font-size="16px" style="line-height:1.25" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="328.00888" y="446.61826" font-family="monospace" font-size="16px">kunit_suite</tspan></text>
+		</g>
+		<g transform="translate(0 -134.61)">
+			<rect x="323.56" y="421.76" width="115.75" height="41.331" fill="#b9dbc6" stroke="#1a1a1a"/>
+			<text x="328.00888" y="446.61826" fill="#000000" font-family="sans-serif" font-size="16px" style="line-height:1.25" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="328.00888" y="446.61826" font-family="monospace" font-size="16px">kunit_suite</tspan></text>
+		</g>
+		<g transform="translate(0 -41.331)">
+			<rect x="323.56" y="421.76" width="115.75" height="41.331" fill="#b9dbc6" stroke="#1a1a1a"/>
+			<text x="328.00888" y="446.61826" fill="#000000" font-family="sans-serif" font-size="16px" style="line-height:1.25" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="328.00888" y="446.61826" font-family="monospace" font-size="16px">kunit_suite</tspan></text>
+		</g>
+		<g transform="translate(3.4459e-5 -.71088)">
+			<rect x="502.19" y="143.16" width="201.13" height="41.331" fill="#dad4d4" fill-opacity=".91765" stroke="#1a1a1a"/>
+			<text x="512.02319" y="168.02026" font-family="sans-serif" font-size="16px" style="line-height:1.25" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="512.02319" y="168.02026" font-family="monospace">_kunit_suites_start</tspan></text>
+		</g>
+		<g transform="translate(3.0518e-5 -3.1753)">
+			<rect x="502.19" y="445.69" width="201.13" height="41.331" fill="#dad4d4" fill-opacity=".91765" stroke="#1a1a1a"/>
+			<text x="521.61694" y="470.54846" font-family="sans-serif" font-size="16px" style="line-height:1.25" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="521.61694" y="470.54846" font-family="monospace">_kunit_suites_end</tspan></text>
+		</g>
+		<rect x="14.224" y="277.78" width="134.47" height="41.331" fill="#dad4d4" fill-opacity=".91765" stroke="#1a1a1a"/>
+		<text x="32.062176" y="304.41287" font-family="sans-serif" font-size="16px" style="line-height:1.25" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="32.062176" y="304.41287" font-family="monospace">.init.data</tspan></text>
+		<g transform="translate(217.98 145.12)" stroke="#1a1a1a">
+			<circle cx="149.97" cy="373.01" r="3.4012"/>
+			<circle cx="163.46" cy="373.01" r="3.4012"/>
+			<circle cx="176.95" cy="373.01" r="3.4012"/>
+		</g>
+		<g transform="translate(217.98 -298.66)" stroke="#1a1a1a">
+			<circle cx="149.97" cy="373.01" r="3.4012"/>
+			<circle cx="163.46" cy="373.01" r="3.4012"/>
+			<circle cx="176.95" cy="373.01" r="3.4012"/>
+		</g>
+		<g stroke="#1a1a1a">
+			<rect x="323.56" y="328.49" width="115.75" height="51.549" fill="#b9dbc6"/>
+			<g transform="translate(217.98 -18.75)">
+				<circle cx="149.97" cy="373.01" r="3.4012"/>
+				<circle cx="163.46" cy="373.01" r="3.4012"/>
+				<circle cx="176.95" cy="373.01" r="3.4012"/>
+			</g>
+		</g>
+		<g transform="scale(1.0933 .9147)" stroke-width="32.937" aria-label="{">
+			<path d="m275.49 545.57c-35.836-8.432-47.43-24.769-47.957-64.821v-88.536c-0.527-44.795-10.54-57.97-49.538-67.456 38.998-10.013 49.011-23.715 49.538-67.983v-88.536c0.527-40.052 12.121-56.389 47.957-64.821v-5.797c-65.348 0-85.901 17.391-86.955 73.253v93.806c-0.527 36.89-10.013 50.065-44.795 59.551 34.782 10.013 44.268 23.188 44.795 60.078v93.279c1.581 56.389 21.607 73.78 86.955 73.78z"/>
+		</g>
+		<g transform="scale(1.1071 .90325)" stroke-width="14.44" aria-label="{">
+			<path d="m461.46 443.55c-15.711-3.6967-20.794-10.859-21.025-28.418v-38.815c-0.23104-19.639-4.6209-25.415-21.718-29.574 17.097-4.3898 21.487-10.397 21.718-29.805v-38.815c0.23105-17.559 5.314-24.722 21.025-28.418v-2.5415c-28.649 0-37.66 7.6244-38.122 32.115v41.126c-0.23105 16.173-4.3898 21.949-19.639 26.108 15.249 4.3898 19.408 10.166 19.639 26.339v40.895c0.69313 24.722 9.4728 32.346 38.122 32.346z"/>
+		</g>
+		<path d="m449.55 161.84v2.5h49.504v-2.5z" color="#000000" style="-inkscape-stroke:none"/>
+		<g fill-rule="evenodd">
+			<path d="m443.78 163.09 8.65-5v10z" color="#000000" stroke-width="1pt" style="-inkscape-stroke:none"/>
+			<path d="m453.1 156.94-10.648 6.1543 0.99804 0.57812 9.6504 5.5781zm-1.334 2.3125v7.6856l-6.6504-3.8438z" color="#000000" style="-inkscape-stroke:none"/>
+		</g>
+		<path d="m449.55 461.91v2.5h49.504v-2.5z" color="#000000" style="-inkscape-stroke:none"/>
+		<g fill-rule="evenodd">
+			<path d="m443.78 463.16 8.65-5v10z" color="#000000" stroke-width="1pt" style="-inkscape-stroke:none"/>
+			<path d="m453.1 457-10.648 6.1562 0.99804 0.57617 9.6504 5.5781zm-1.334 2.3125v7.6856l-6.6504-3.8438z" color="#000000" style="-inkscape-stroke:none"/>
+		</g>
+		<rect x="515.64" y="223.9" width="294.52" height="178.49" fill="#dad4d4" fill-opacity=".91765" stroke="#1a1a1a"/>
+		<text x="523.33319" y="262.52542" font-family="monospace" font-size="14.667px" style="line-height:1.25" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="523.33319" y="262.52542"><tspan fill="#008000" font-family="monospace" font-size="14.667px" font-weight="bold">struct</tspan> kunit_suite {</tspan><tspan x="523.33319" y="280.8588"><tspan fill="#008000" font-family="monospace" font-size="14.667px" font-weight="bold">  const char</tspan> name[<tspan fill="#ff00ff" font-size="14.667px">256</tspan>];</tspan><tspan x="523.33319" y="299.19217">  <tspan fill="#008000" font-family="monospace" font-size="14.667px" font-weight="bold">int</tspan> (*init)(<tspan fill="#008000" font-family="monospace" font-size="14.667px" font-weight="bold">struct</tspan> kunit *);</tspan><tspan x="523.33319" y="317.52554">  <tspan fill="#008000" font-family="monospace" font-size="14.667px" font-weight="bold">void</tspan> (*exit)(<tspan fill="#008000" font-family="monospace" font-size="14.667px" font-weight="bold">struct</tspan> kunit *);</tspan><tspan x="523.33319" y="335.85892">  <tspan fill="#008000" font-family="monospace" font-size="14.667px" font-weight="bold">struct</tspan> kunit_case *test_cases;</tspan><tspan x="523.33319" y="354.19229">  ...</tspan><tspan x="523.33319" y="372.52567">};</tspan></text>
+	</g>
+</svg>
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e7b46421f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+============================
+Run Tests without kunit_tool
+============================
+
+If we do not want to use kunit_tool (For example: we want to integrate
+with other systems, or run tests on real hardware), we can
+include KUnit in any kernel, read out results, and parse manually.
+
+.. note:: KUnit is not designed for use in a production system. It is
+          possible that tests may reduce the stability or security of
+          the system.
+
+Configure the Kernel
+====================
+
+KUnit tests can run without kunit_tool. This can be useful, if:
+
+- We have an existing kernel configuration to test.
+- Need to run on real hardware (or using an emulator/VM kunit_tool
+  does not support).
+- Wish to integrate with some existing testing systems.
+
+KUnit is configured with the ``CONFIG_KUNIT`` option, and individual
+tests can also be built by enabling their config options in our
+``.config``. KUnit tests usually (but don't always) have config options
+ending in ``_KUNIT_TEST``. Most tests can either be built as a module,
+or be built into the kernel.
+
+.. note ::
+
+	We can enable the ``KUNIT_ALL_TESTS`` config option to
+	automatically enable all tests with satisfied dependencies. This is
+	a good way of quickly testing everything applicable to the current
+	config.
+
+Once we have built our kernel (and/or modules), it is simple to run
+the tests. If the tests are built-in, they will run automatically on the
+kernel boot. The results will be written to the kernel log (``dmesg``)
+in TAP format.
+
+If the tests are built as modules, they will run when the module is
+loaded.
+
+.. code-block :: bash
+
+	# modprobe example-test
+
+The results will appear in TAP format in ``dmesg``.
+
+.. note ::
+
+	If ``CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS`` is enabled, KUnit test results will
+	be accessible from the ``debugfs`` filesystem (if mounted).
+	They will be in ``/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test_suite>/results``, in
+	TAP format.
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dafe8eb28
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+=============================
+Running tests with kunit_tool
+=============================
+
+We can either run KUnit tests using kunit_tool or can run tests
+manually, and then use kunit_tool to parse the results. To run tests
+manually, see: Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst.
+As long as we can build the kernel, we can run KUnit.
+
+kunit_tool is a Python script which configures and builds a kernel, runs
+tests, and formats the test results.
+
+Run command:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
+
+We should see the following:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
+	Building KUnit kernel...
+	Starting KUnit kernel...
+
+We may want to use the following options:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --timeout=30 --jobs=`nproc --all`
+
+- ``--timeout`` sets a maximum amount of time for tests to run.
+- ``--jobs`` sets the number of threads to build the kernel.
+
+kunit_tool will generate a ``.kunitconfig`` with a default
+configuration, if no other ``.kunitconfig`` file exists
+(in the build directory). In addition, it verifies that the
+generated ``.config`` file contains the ``CONFIG`` options in the
+``.kunitconfig``.
+It is also possible to pass a separate ``.kunitconfig`` fragment to
+kunit_tool. This is useful if we have several different groups of
+tests we want to run independently, or if we want to use pre-defined
+test configs for certain subsystems.
+
+To use a different ``.kunitconfig`` file (such as one
+provided to test a particular subsystem), pass it as an option:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=fs/ext4/.kunitconfig
+
+To view kunit_tool flags (optional command-line arguments), run:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --help
+
+Creating a ``.kunitconfig`` file
+================================
+
+If we want to run a specific set of tests (rather than those listed
+in the KUnit ``defconfig``), we can provide Kconfig options in the
+``.kunitconfig`` file. For default .kunitconfig, see:
+https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config.
+A ``.kunitconfig`` is a ``minconfig`` (a .config
+generated by running ``make savedefconfig``), used for running a
+specific set of tests. This file contains the regular Kernel configs
+with specific test targets. The ``.kunitconfig`` also
+contains any other config options required by the tests (For example:
+dependencies for features under tests, configs that enable/disable
+certain code blocks, arch configs and so on).
+
+To create a ``.kunitconfig``, using the KUnit ``defconfig``:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	cd $PATH_TO_LINUX_REPO
+	cp tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config .kunit/.kunitconfig
+
+We can then add any other Kconfig options. For example:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST=y
+
+kunit_tool ensures that all config options in ``.kunitconfig`` are
+set in the kernel ``.config`` before running the tests. It warns if we
+have not included the options dependencies.
+
+.. note:: Removing something from the ``.kunitconfig`` will
+   not rebuild the ``.config file``. The configuration is only
+   updated if the ``.kunitconfig`` is not a subset of ``.config``.
+   This means that we can use other tools
+   (For example: ``make menuconfig``) to adjust other config options.
+   The build dir needs to be set for ``make menuconfig`` to
+   work, therefore  by default use ``make O=.kunit menuconfig``.
+
+Configuring, building, and running tests
+========================================
+
+If we want to make manual changes to the KUnit build process, we
+can run part of the KUnit build process independently.
+When running kunit_tool, from a ``.kunitconfig``, we can generate a
+``.config`` by using the ``config`` argument:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config
+
+To build a KUnit kernel from the current ``.config``, we can use the
+``build`` argument:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build
+
+If we already have built UML kernel with built-in KUnit tests, we
+can run the kernel, and display the test results with the ``exec``
+argument:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec
+
+The ``run`` command discussed in section: **Running tests with kunit_tool**,
+is equivalent to running the above three commands in sequence.
+
+Parsing test results
+====================
+
+KUnit tests output displays results in TAP (Test Anything Protocol)
+format. When running tests, kunit_tool parses this output and prints
+a summary. To see the raw test results in TAP format, we can pass the
+``--raw_output`` argument:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output
+
+If we have KUnit results in the raw TAP format, we can parse them and
+print the human-readable summary with the ``parse`` command for
+kunit_tool. This accepts a filename for an argument, or will read from
+standard input.
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	# Reading from a file
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /var/log/dmesg
+	# Reading from stdin
+	dmesg | ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse
+
+Filtering tests
+===============
+
+By passing a bash style glob filter to the ``exec`` or ``run``
+commands, we can run a subset of the tests built into a kernel . For
+example: if we only want to run KUnit resource tests, use:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'kunit-resource*'
+
+This uses the standard glob format with wildcard characters.
+
+.. _kunit-on-qemu:
+
+Running tests on QEMU
+=====================
+
+kunit_tool supports running tests on  qemu as well as
+via UML. To run tests on qemu, by default it requires two flags:
+
+- ``--arch``: Selects a configs collection (Kconfig, qemu config options
+  and so on), that allow KUnit tests to be run on the specified
+  architecture in a minimal way. The architecture argument is same as
+  the option name passed to the ``ARCH`` variable used by Kbuild.
+  Not all architectures currently support this flag, but we can use
+  ``--qemu_config`` to handle it. If ``um`` is passed (or this flag
+  is ignored), the tests will run via UML. Non-UML architectures,
+  for example: i386, x86_64, arm and so on; run on qemu.
+
+- ``--cross_compile``: Specifies the Kbuild toolchain. It passes the
+  same argument as passed to the ``CROSS_COMPILE`` variable used by
+  Kbuild. As a reminder, this will be the prefix for the toolchain
+  binaries such as GCC. For example:
+
+  - ``sparc64-linux-gnu`` if we have the sparc toolchain installed on
+    our system.
+
+  - ``$HOME/toolchains/microblaze/gcc-9.2.0-nolibc/microblaze-linux/bin/microblaze-linux``
+    if we have downloaded the microblaze toolchain from the 0-day
+    website to a directory in our home directory called toolchains.
+
+This means that for most architectures, running under qemu is as simple as:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64
+
+When cross-compiling, we'll likely need to specify a different toolchain, for
+example:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
+		--arch=s390 \
+		--cross_compile=s390x-linux-gnu-
+
+If we want to run KUnit tests on an architecture not supported by
+the ``--arch`` flag, or want to run KUnit tests on qemu using a
+non-default configuration; then we can write our own``QemuConfig``.
+These ``QemuConfigs`` are written in Python. They have an import line
+``from..qemu_config import QemuArchParams`` at the top of the file.
+The file must contain a variable called ``QEMU_ARCH`` that has an
+instance of ``QemuArchParams`` assigned to it. See example in:
+``tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/x86_64.py``.
+
+Once we have a ``QemuConfig``, we can pass it into kunit_tool,
+using the ``--qemu_config`` flag. When used, this flag replaces the
+``--arch`` flag. For example: using
+``tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/x86_64.py``, the invocation appear
+as
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
+		--timeout=60 \
+		--jobs=12 \
+		--qemu_config=./tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/x86_64.py
+
+Running command-line arguments
+==============================
+
+kunit_tool has a number of other command-line arguments which can
+be useful for our test environment. Below are the most commonly used
+command line arguments:
+
+- ``--help``: Lists all available options. To list common options,
+  place ``--help`` before the command. To list options specific to that
+  command, place ``--help`` after the command.
+
+  .. note:: Different commands (``config``, ``build``, ``run``, etc)
+            have different supported options.
+- ``--build_dir``: Specifies kunit_tool build directory. It includes
+  the ``.kunitconfig``, ``.config`` files and compiled kernel.
+
+- ``--make_options``: Specifies additional options to pass to make, when
+  compiling a kernel (using ``build`` or ``run`` commands). For example:
+  to enable compiler warnings, we can pass ``--make_options W=1``.
+
+- ``--alltests``: Enable a predefined set of options in order to build
+  as many tests as possible.
+
+  .. note:: The list of enabled options can be found in
+            ``tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config``.
+
+            If you only want to enable all tests with otherwise satisfied
+            dependencies, instead add ``CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y`` to your
+            ``.kunitconfig``.
+
+- ``--kunitconfig``: Specifies the path or the directory of the ``.kunitconfig``
+  file. For example:
+
+  - ``lib/kunit/.kunitconfig`` can be the path of the file.
+
+  - ``lib/kunit`` can be the directory in which the file is located.
+
+  This file is used to build and run with a predefined set of tests
+  and their dependencies. For example, to run tests for a given subsystem.
+
+- ``--kconfig_add``: Specifies additional configuration options to be
+  appended to the ``.kunitconfig`` file. For example:
+
+  .. code-block::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kconfig_add CONFIG_KASAN=y
+
+- ``--arch``: Runs tests on the specified architecture. The architecture
+  argument is same as the Kbuild ARCH environment variable.
+  For example, i386, x86_64, arm, um, etc. Non-UML architectures run on qemu.
+  Default is `um`.
+
+- ``--cross_compile``: Specifies the Kbuild toolchain. It passes the
+  same argument as passed to the ``CROSS_COMPILE`` variable used by
+  Kbuild. This will be the prefix for the toolchain
+  binaries such as GCC. For example:
+
+  - ``sparc64-linux-gnu-`` if we have the sparc toolchain installed on
+    our system.
+
+  - ``$HOME/toolchains/microblaze/gcc-9.2.0-nolibc/microblaze-linux/bin/microblaze-linux``
+    if we have downloaded the microblaze toolchain from the 0-day
+    website to a specified path in our home directory called toolchains.
+
+- ``--qemu_config``: Specifies the path to a file containing a
+  custom qemu architecture definition. This should be a python file
+  containing a `QemuArchParams` object.
+
+- ``--qemu_args``: Specifies additional qemu arguments, for example, ``-smp 8``.
+
+- ``--jobs``: Specifies the number of jobs (commands) to run simultaneously.
+  By default, this is set to the number of cores on your system.
+
+- ``--timeout``: Specifies the maximum number of seconds allowed for all tests to run.
+  This does not include the time taken to build the tests.
+
+- ``--kernel_args``: Specifies additional kernel command-line arguments. May be repeated.
+
+- ``--run_isolated``: If set, boots the kernel for each individual suite/test.
+  This is useful for debugging a non-hermetic test, one that
+  might pass/fail based on what ran before it.
+
+- ``--raw_output``: If set, generates unformatted output from kernel. Possible options are:
+
+   - ``all``: To view the full kernel output, use ``--raw_output=all``.
+
+   - ``kunit``: This is the default option and filters to KUnit output. Use ``--raw_output`` or ``--raw_output=kunit``.
+
+- ``--json``: If set, stores the test results in a JSON format and prints to `stdout` or
+  saves to a file if a filename is specified.
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8e8c493f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+============================
+Tips For Running KUnit Tests
+============================
+
+Using ``kunit.py run`` ("kunit tool")
+=====================================
+
+Running from any directory
+--------------------------
+
+It can be handy to create a bash function like:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	function run_kunit() {
+	  ( cd "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)" && ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run "$@" )
+	}
+
+.. note::
+	Early versions of ``kunit.py`` (before 5.6) didn't work unless run from
+	the kernel root, hence the use of a subshell and ``cd``.
+
+Running a subset of tests
+-------------------------
+
+``kunit.py run`` accepts an optional glob argument to filter tests. The format
+is ``"<suite_glob>[.test_glob]"``.
+
+Say that we wanted to run the sysctl tests, we could do so via:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	$ echo -e 'CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y' > .kunit/.kunitconfig
+	$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'sysctl*'
+
+We can filter down to just the "write" tests via:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	$ echo -e 'CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y' > .kunit/.kunitconfig
+	$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'sysctl*.*write*'
+
+We're paying the cost of building more tests than we need this way, but it's
+easier than fiddling with ``.kunitconfig`` files or commenting out
+``kunit_suite``'s.
+
+However, if we wanted to define a set of tests in a less ad hoc way, the next
+tip is useful.
+
+Defining a set of tests
+-----------------------
+
+``kunit.py run`` (along with ``build``, and ``config``) supports a
+``--kunitconfig`` flag. So if you have a set of tests that you want to run on a
+regular basis (especially if they have other dependencies), you can create a
+specific ``.kunitconfig`` for them.
+
+E.g. kunit has one for its tests:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit/.kunitconfig
+
+Alternatively, if you're following the convention of naming your
+file ``.kunitconfig``, you can just pass in the dir, e.g.
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit
+
+.. note::
+	This is a relatively new feature (5.12+) so we don't have any
+	conventions yet about on what files should be checked in versus just
+	kept around locally. It's up to you and your maintainer to decide if a
+	config is useful enough to submit (and therefore have to maintain).
+
+.. note::
+	Having ``.kunitconfig`` fragments in a parent and child directory is
+	iffy. There's discussion about adding an "import" statement in these
+	files to make it possible to have a top-level config run tests from all
+	child directories. But that would mean ``.kunitconfig`` files are no
+	longer just simple .config fragments.
+
+	One alternative would be to have kunit tool recursively combine configs
+	automagically, but tests could theoretically depend on incompatible
+	options, so handling that would be tricky.
+
+Setting kernel commandline parameters
+-------------------------------------
+
+You can use ``--kernel_args`` to pass arbitrary kernel arguments, e.g.
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_args=param=42 --kernel_args=param2=false
+
+
+Generating code coverage reports under UML
+------------------------------------------
+
+.. note::
+	TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): There are various issues with UML and
+	versions of gcc 7 and up. You're likely to run into missing ``.gcda``
+	files or compile errors.
+
+This is different from the "normal" way of getting coverage information that is
+documented in Documentation/dev-tools/gcov.rst.
+
+Instead of enabling ``CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL=y``, we can set these options:
+
+.. code-block:: none
+
+	CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
+	CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y
+	CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF_TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT=y
+	CONFIG_GCOV=y
+
+
+Putting it together into a copy-pastable sequence of commands:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	# Append coverage options to the current config
+	$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=.kunit/ --kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/configs/coverage_uml.config
+	# Extract the coverage information from the build dir (.kunit/)
+	$ lcov -t "my_kunit_tests" -o coverage.info -c -d .kunit/
+
+	# From here on, it's the same process as with CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL=y
+	# E.g. can generate an HTML report in a tmp dir like so:
+	$ genhtml -o /tmp/coverage_html coverage.info
+
+
+If your installed version of gcc doesn't work, you can tweak the steps:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --make_options=CC=/usr/bin/gcc-6
+	$ lcov -t "my_kunit_tests" -o coverage.info -c -d .kunit/ --gcov-tool=/usr/bin/gcov-6
+
+
+Running tests manually
+======================
+
+Running tests without using ``kunit.py run`` is also an important use case.
+Currently it's your only option if you want to test on architectures other than
+UML.
+
+As running the tests under UML is fairly straightforward (configure and compile
+the kernel, run the ``./linux`` binary), this section will focus on testing
+non-UML architectures.
+
+
+Running built-in tests
+----------------------
+
+When setting tests to ``=y``, the tests will run as part of boot and print
+results to dmesg in TAP format. So you just need to add your tests to your
+``.config``, build and boot your kernel as normal.
+
+So if we compiled our kernel with:
+
+.. code-block:: none
+
+	CONFIG_KUNIT=y
+	CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=y
+
+Then we'd see output like this in dmesg signaling the test ran and passed:
+
+.. code-block:: none
+
+	TAP version 14
+	1..1
+	    # Subtest: example
+	    1..1
+	    # example_simple_test: initializing
+	    ok 1 - example_simple_test
+	ok 1 - example
+
+Running tests as modules
+------------------------
+
+Depending on the tests, you can build them as loadable modules.
+
+For example, we'd change the config options from before to
+
+.. code-block:: none
+
+	CONFIG_KUNIT=y
+	CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=m
+
+Then after booting into our kernel, we can run the test via
+
+.. code-block:: none
+
+	$ modprobe kunit-example-test
+
+This will then cause it to print TAP output to stdout.
+
+.. note::
+	The ``modprobe`` will *not* have a non-zero exit code if any test
+	failed (as of 5.13). But ``kunit.py parse`` would, see below.
+
+.. note::
+	You can set ``CONFIG_KUNIT=m`` as well, however, some features will not
+	work and thus some tests might break. Ideally tests would specify they
+	depend on ``KUNIT=y`` in their ``Kconfig``'s, but this is an edge case
+	most test authors won't think about.
+	As of 5.13, the only difference is that ``current->kunit_test`` will
+	not exist.
+
+Pretty-printing results
+-----------------------
+
+You can use ``kunit.py parse`` to parse dmesg for test output and print out
+results in the same familiar format that ``kunit.py run`` does.
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /var/log/dmesg
+
+
+Retrieving per suite results
+----------------------------
+
+Regardless of how you're running your tests, you can enable
+``CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS`` to expose per-suite TAP-formatted results:
+
+.. code-block:: none
+
+	CONFIG_KUNIT=y
+	CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=m
+	CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS=y
+
+The results for each suite will be exposed under
+``/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results``.
+So using our example config:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	$ modprobe kunit-example-test > /dev/null
+	$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/example/results
+	... <TAP output> ...
+
+	# After removing the module, the corresponding files will go away
+	$ modprobe -r kunit-example-test
+	$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/example/results
+	/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/example/results: No such file or directory
+
+Generating code coverage reports
+--------------------------------
+
+See Documentation/dev-tools/gcov.rst for details on how to do this.
+
+The only vaguely KUnit-specific advice here is that you probably want to build
+your tests as modules. That way you can isolate the coverage from tests from
+other code executed during boot, e.g.
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	# Reset coverage counters before running the test.
+	$ echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/gcov/reset
+	$ modprobe kunit-example-test
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f4f504f1f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,306 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+===============
+Getting Started
+===============
+
+This page contains an overview of the kunit_tool and KUnit framework,
+teaching how to run existing tests and then how to write a simple test case,
+and covers common problems users face when using KUnit for the first time.
+
+Installing Dependencies
+=======================
+KUnit has the same dependencies as the Linux kernel. As long as you can
+build the kernel, you can run KUnit.
+
+Running tests with kunit_tool
+=============================
+kunit_tool is a Python script, which configures and builds a kernel, runs
+tests, and formats the test results. From the kernel repository, you
+can run kunit_tool:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
+
+.. note ::
+	You may see the following error:
+	"The source tree is not clean, please run 'make ARCH=um mrproper'"
+
+	This happens because internally kunit.py specifies ``.kunit``
+	(default option) as the build directory in the command ``make O=output/dir``
+	through the argument ``--build_dir``.  Hence, before starting an
+	out-of-tree build, the source tree must be clean.
+
+	There is also the same caveat mentioned in the "Build directory for
+	the kernel" section of the :doc:`admin-guide </admin-guide/README>`,
+	that is, its use, it must be used for all invocations of ``make``.
+	The good news is that it can indeed be solved by running
+	``make ARCH=um mrproper``, just be aware that this will delete the
+	current configuration and all generated files.
+
+If everything worked correctly, you should see the following:
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
+	Building KUnit Kernel ...
+	Starting KUnit Kernel ...
+
+The tests will pass or fail.
+
+.. note ::
+   Because it is building a lot of sources for the first time,
+   the ``Building KUnit Kernel`` step may take a while.
+
+For detailed information on this wrapper, see:
+Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst.
+
+Selecting which tests to run
+----------------------------
+
+By default, kunit_tool runs all tests reachable with minimal configuration,
+that is, using default values for most of the kconfig options.  However,
+you can select which tests to run by:
+
+- `Customizing Kconfig`_ used to compile the kernel, or
+- `Filtering tests by name`_ to select specifically which compiled tests to run.
+
+Customizing Kconfig
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+A good starting point for the ``.kunitconfig`` is the KUnit default config.
+If you didn't run ``kunit.py run`` yet, you can generate it by running:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	cd $PATH_TO_LINUX_REPO
+	tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config
+	cat .kunit/.kunitconfig
+
+.. note ::
+   ``.kunitconfig`` lives in the ``--build_dir`` used by kunit.py, which is
+   ``.kunit`` by default.
+
+Before running the tests, kunit_tool ensures that all config options
+set in ``.kunitconfig`` are set in the kernel ``.config``. It will warn
+you if you have not included dependencies for the options used.
+
+There are many ways to customize the configurations:
+
+a. Edit ``.kunit/.kunitconfig``. The file should contain the list of kconfig
+   options required to run the desired tests, including their dependencies.
+   You may want to remove CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS from the ``.kunitconfig`` as
+   it will enable a number of additional tests that you may not want.
+   If you need to run on an architecture other than UML see :ref:`kunit-on-qemu`.
+
+b. Enable additional kconfig options on top of ``.kunit/.kunitconfig``.
+   For example, to include the kernel's linked-list test you can run::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
+		--kconfig_add CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST=y
+
+c. Provide the path of one or more .kunitconfig files from the tree.
+   For example, to run only ``FAT_FS`` and ``EXT4`` tests you can run::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
+		--kunitconfig ./fs/fat/.kunitconfig \
+		--kunitconfig ./fs/ext4/.kunitconfig
+
+d. If you change the ``.kunitconfig``, kunit.py will trigger a rebuild of the
+   ``.config`` file. But you can edit the ``.config`` file directly or with
+   tools like ``make menuconfig O=.kunit``. As long as its a superset of
+   ``.kunitconfig``, kunit.py won't overwrite your changes.
+
+
+.. note ::
+
+	To save a .kunitconfig after finding a satisfactory configuration::
+
+		make savedefconfig O=.kunit
+		cp .kunit/defconfig .kunit/.kunitconfig
+
+Filtering tests by name
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+If you want to be more specific than Kconfig can provide, it is also possible
+to select which tests to execute at boot-time by passing a glob filter
+(read instructions regarding the pattern in the manpage :manpage:`glob(7)`).
+If there is a ``"."`` (period) in the filter, it will be interpreted as a
+separator between the name of the test suite and the test case,
+otherwise, it will be interpreted as the name of the test suite.
+For example, let's assume we are using the default config:
+
+a. inform the name of a test suite, like ``"kunit_executor_test"``,
+   to run every test case it contains::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run "kunit_executor_test"
+
+b. inform the name of a test case prefixed by its test suite,
+   like ``"example.example_simple_test"``, to run specifically that test case::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run "example.example_simple_test"
+
+c. use wildcard characters (``*?[``) to run any test case that matches the pattern,
+   like ``"*.*64*"`` to run test cases containing ``"64"`` in the name inside
+   any test suite::
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run "*.*64*"
+
+Running Tests without the KUnit Wrapper
+=======================================
+If you do not want to use the KUnit Wrapper (for example: you want code
+under test to integrate with other systems, or use a different/
+unsupported architecture or configuration), KUnit can be included in
+any kernel, and the results are read out and parsed manually.
+
+.. note ::
+   ``CONFIG_KUNIT`` should not be enabled in a production environment.
+   Enabling KUnit disables Kernel Address-Space Layout Randomization
+   (KASLR), and tests may affect the state of the kernel in ways not
+   suitable for production.
+
+Configuring the Kernel
+----------------------
+To enable KUnit itself, you need to enable the ``CONFIG_KUNIT`` Kconfig
+option (under Kernel Hacking/Kernel Testing and Coverage in
+``menuconfig``). From there, you can enable any KUnit tests. They
+usually have config options ending in ``_KUNIT_TEST``.
+
+KUnit and KUnit tests can be compiled as modules. The tests in a module
+will run when the module is loaded.
+
+Running Tests (without KUnit Wrapper)
+-------------------------------------
+Build and run your kernel. In the kernel log, the test output is printed
+out in the TAP format. This will only happen by default if KUnit/tests
+are built-in. Otherwise the module will need to be loaded.
+
+.. note ::
+   Some lines and/or data may get interspersed in the TAP output.
+
+Writing Your First Test
+=======================
+In your kernel repository, let's add some code that we can test.
+
+1. Create a file ``drivers/misc/example.h``, which includes:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	int misc_example_add(int left, int right);
+
+2. Create a file ``drivers/misc/example.c``, which includes:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	#include <linux/errno.h>
+
+	#include "example.h"
+
+	int misc_example_add(int left, int right)
+	{
+		return left + right;
+	}
+
+3. Add the following lines to ``drivers/misc/Kconfig``:
+
+.. code-block:: kconfig
+
+	config MISC_EXAMPLE
+		bool "My example"
+
+4. Add the following lines to ``drivers/misc/Makefile``:
+
+.. code-block:: make
+
+	obj-$(CONFIG_MISC_EXAMPLE) += example.o
+
+Now we are ready to write the test cases.
+
+1. Add the below test case in ``drivers/misc/example_test.c``:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	#include <kunit/test.h>
+	#include "example.h"
+
+	/* Define the test cases. */
+
+	static void misc_example_add_test_basic(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, misc_example_add(1, 0));
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2, misc_example_add(1, 1));
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, misc_example_add(-1, 1));
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, INT_MAX, misc_example_add(0, INT_MAX));
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1, misc_example_add(INT_MAX, INT_MIN));
+	}
+
+	static void misc_example_test_failure(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "This test never passes.");
+	}
+
+	static struct kunit_case misc_example_test_cases[] = {
+		KUNIT_CASE(misc_example_add_test_basic),
+		KUNIT_CASE(misc_example_test_failure),
+		{}
+	};
+
+	static struct kunit_suite misc_example_test_suite = {
+		.name = "misc-example",
+		.test_cases = misc_example_test_cases,
+	};
+	kunit_test_suite(misc_example_test_suite);
+
+2. Add the following lines to ``drivers/misc/Kconfig``:
+
+.. code-block:: kconfig
+
+	config MISC_EXAMPLE_TEST
+		tristate "Test for my example" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+		depends on MISC_EXAMPLE && KUNIT=y
+		default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+
+3. Add the following lines to ``drivers/misc/Makefile``:
+
+.. code-block:: make
+
+	obj-$(CONFIG_MISC_EXAMPLE_TEST) += example_test.o
+
+4. Add the following lines to ``.kunit/.kunitconfig``:
+
+.. code-block:: none
+
+	CONFIG_MISC_EXAMPLE=y
+	CONFIG_MISC_EXAMPLE_TEST=y
+
+5. Run the test:
+
+.. code-block:: bash
+
+	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
+
+You should see the following failure:
+
+.. code-block:: none
+
+	...
+	[16:08:57] [PASSED] misc-example:misc_example_add_test_basic
+	[16:08:57] [FAILED] misc-example:misc_example_test_failure
+	[16:08:57] EXPECTATION FAILED at drivers/misc/example-test.c:17
+	[16:08:57]      This test never passes.
+	...
+
+Congrats! You just wrote your first KUnit test.
+
+Next Steps
+==========
+
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst - KUnit architecture.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst - run kunit_tool.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst - run tests without kunit_tool.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst - write tests.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst - best practices with
+    examples.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst - KUnit APIs
+    used for testing.
+*   Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst - KUnit common questions and
+    answers.
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b6d0d7359
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+===========================
+Test Style and Nomenclature
+===========================
+
+To make finding, writing, and using KUnit tests as simple as possible, it is
+strongly encouraged that they are named and written according to the guidelines
+below. While it is possible to write KUnit tests which do not follow these rules,
+they may break some tooling, may conflict with other tests, and may not be run
+automatically by testing systems.
+
+It is recommended that you only deviate from these guidelines when:
+
+1. Porting tests to KUnit which are already known with an existing name.
+2. Writing tests which would cause serious problems if automatically run. For
+   example, non-deterministically producing false positives or negatives, or
+   taking a long time to run.
+
+Subsystems, Suites, and Tests
+=============================
+
+To make tests easy to find, they are grouped into suites and subsystems. A test
+suite is a group of tests which test a related area of the kernel. A subsystem
+is a set of test suites which test different parts of a kernel subsystem
+or a driver.
+
+Subsystems
+----------
+
+Every test suite must belong to a subsystem. A subsystem is a collection of one
+or more KUnit test suites which test the same driver or part of the kernel. A
+test subsystem should match a single kernel module. If the code being tested
+cannot be compiled as a module, in many cases the subsystem should correspond to
+a directory in the source tree or an entry in the ``MAINTAINERS`` file. If
+unsure, follow the conventions set by tests in similar areas.
+
+Test subsystems should be named after the code being tested, either after the
+module (wherever possible), or after the directory or files being tested. Test
+subsystems should be named to avoid ambiguity where necessary.
+
+If a test subsystem name has multiple components, they should be separated by
+underscores. *Do not* include "test" or "kunit" directly in the subsystem name
+unless we are actually testing other tests or the kunit framework itself. For
+example, subsystems could be called:
+
+``ext4``
+  Matches the module and filesystem name.
+``apparmor``
+  Matches the module name and LSM name.
+``kasan``
+  Common name for the tool, prominent part of the path ``mm/kasan``
+``snd_hda_codec_hdmi``
+  Has several components (``snd``, ``hda``, ``codec``, ``hdmi``) separated by
+  underscores. Matches the module name.
+
+Avoid names as shown in examples below:
+
+``linear-ranges``
+  Names should use underscores, not dashes, to separate words. Prefer
+  ``linear_ranges``.
+``qos-kunit-test``
+  This name should use underscores, and not have "kunit-test" as a
+  suffix. ``qos`` is also ambiguous as a subsystem name, because several parts
+  of the kernel have a ``qos`` subsystem. ``power_qos`` would be a better name.
+``pc_parallel_port``
+  The corresponding module name is ``parport_pc``, so this subsystem should also
+  be named ``parport_pc``.
+
+.. note::
+        The KUnit API and tools do not explicitly know about subsystems. They are
+        a way of categorizing test suites and naming modules which provides a
+        simple, consistent way for humans to find and run tests. This may change
+        in the future.
+
+Suites
+------
+
+KUnit tests are grouped into test suites, which cover a specific area of
+functionality being tested. Test suites can have shared initialization and
+shutdown code which is run for all tests in the suite. Not all subsystems need
+to be split into multiple test suites (for example, simple drivers).
+
+Test suites are named after the subsystem they are part of. If a subsystem
+contains several suites, the specific area under test should be appended to the
+subsystem name, separated by an underscore.
+
+In the event that there are multiple types of test using KUnit within a
+subsystem (for example, both unit tests and integration tests), they should be
+put into separate suites, with the type of test as the last element in the suite
+name. Unless these tests are actually present, avoid using ``_test``, ``_unittest``
+or similar in the suite name.
+
+The full test suite name (including the subsystem name) should be specified as
+the ``.name`` member of the ``kunit_suite`` struct, and forms the base for the
+module name. For example, test suites could include:
+
+``ext4_inode``
+  Part of the ``ext4`` subsystem, testing the ``inode`` area.
+``kunit_try_catch``
+  Part of the ``kunit`` implementation itself, testing the ``try_catch`` area.
+``apparmor_property_entry``
+  Part of the ``apparmor`` subsystem, testing the ``property_entry`` area.
+``kasan``
+  The ``kasan`` subsystem has only one suite, so the suite name is the same as
+  the subsystem name.
+
+Avoid names, for example:
+
+``ext4_ext4_inode``
+  There is no reason to state the subsystem twice.
+``property_entry``
+  The suite name is ambiguous without the subsystem name.
+``kasan_integration_test``
+  Because there is only one suite in the ``kasan`` subsystem, the suite should
+  just be called as ``kasan``. Do not redundantly add
+  ``integration_test``. It should be a separate test suite. For example, if the
+  unit tests are added, then that suite could be named as ``kasan_unittest`` or
+  similar.
+
+Test Cases
+----------
+
+Individual tests consist of a single function which tests a constrained
+codepath, property, or function. In the test output, an individual test's
+results will show up as subtests of the suite's results.
+
+Tests should be named after what they are testing. This is often the name of the
+function being tested, with a description of the input or codepath being tested.
+As tests are C functions, they should be named and written in accordance with
+the kernel coding style.
+
+.. note::
+        As tests are themselves functions, their names cannot conflict with
+        other C identifiers in the kernel. This may require some creative
+        naming. It is a good idea to make your test functions `static` to avoid
+        polluting the global namespace.
+
+Example test names include:
+
+``unpack_u32_with_null_name``
+  Tests the ``unpack_u32`` function when a NULL name is passed in.
+``test_list_splice``
+  Tests the ``list_splice`` macro. It has the prefix ``test_`` to avoid a
+  name conflict with the macro itself.
+
+
+Should it be necessary to refer to a test outside the context of its test suite,
+the *fully-qualified* name of a test should be the suite name followed by the
+test name, separated by a colon (i.e. ``suite:test``).
+
+Test Kconfig Entries
+====================
+
+Every test suite should be tied to a Kconfig entry.
+
+This Kconfig entry must:
+
+* be named ``CONFIG_<name>_KUNIT_TEST``: where <name> is the name of the test
+  suite.
+* be listed either alongside the config entries for the driver/subsystem being
+  tested, or be under [Kernel Hacking]->[Kernel Testing and Coverage]
+* depend on ``CONFIG_KUNIT``.
+* be visible only if ``CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS`` is not enabled.
+* have a default value of ``CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS``.
+* have a brief description of KUnit in the help text.
+
+If we are not able to meet above conditions (for example, the test is unable to
+be built as a module), Kconfig entries for tests should be tristate.
+
+For example, a Kconfig entry might look like:
+
+.. code-block:: none
+
+	config FOO_KUNIT_TEST
+		tristate "KUnit test for foo" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+		depends on KUNIT
+		default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+		help
+		  This builds unit tests for foo.
+
+		  For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general,
+		  please refer to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
+
+		  If unsure, say N.
+
+
+Test File and Module Names
+==========================
+
+KUnit tests can often be compiled as a module. These modules should be named
+after the test suite, followed by ``_test``. If this is likely to conflict with
+non-KUnit tests, the suffix ``_kunit`` can also be used.
+
+The easiest way of achieving this is to name the file containing the test suite
+``<suite>_test.c`` (or, as above, ``<suite>_kunit.c``). This file should be
+placed next to the code under test.
+
+If the suite name contains some or all of the name of the test's parent
+directory, it may make sense to modify the source filename to reduce redundancy.
+For example, a ``foo_firmware`` suite could be in the ``foo/firmware_test.c``
+file.
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..492d2ded2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+============================
+Tips For Writing KUnit Tests
+============================
+
+Exiting early on failed expectations
+------------------------------------
+
+``KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ`` and friends will mark the test as failed and continue
+execution.  In some cases, it's unsafe to continue and you can use the
+``KUNIT_ASSERT`` variant to exit on failure.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	void example_test_user_alloc_function(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		void *object = alloc_some_object_for_me();
+
+		/* Make sure we got a valid pointer back. */
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, object);
+		do_something_with_object(object);
+	}
+
+Allocating memory
+-----------------
+
+Where you would use ``kzalloc``, you should prefer ``kunit_kzalloc`` instead.
+KUnit will ensure the memory is freed once the test completes.
+
+This is particularly useful since it lets you use the ``KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ``
+macros to exit early from a test without having to worry about remembering to
+call ``kfree``.
+
+Example:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	void example_test_allocation(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		char *buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, 16, GFP_KERNEL);
+		/* Ensure allocation succeeded. */
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
+
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ(test, buffer, "");
+	}
+
+
+Testing static functions
+------------------------
+
+If you don't want to expose functions or variables just for testing, one option
+is to conditionally ``#include`` the test file at the end of your .c file, e.g.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	/* In my_file.c */
+
+	static int do_interesting_thing();
+
+	#ifdef CONFIG_MY_KUNIT_TEST
+	#include "my_kunit_test.c"
+	#endif
+
+Injecting test-only code
+------------------------
+
+Similarly to the above, it can be useful to add test-specific logic.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	/* In my_file.h */
+
+	#ifdef CONFIG_MY_KUNIT_TEST
+	/* Defined in my_kunit_test.c */
+	void test_only_hook(void);
+	#else
+	void test_only_hook(void) { }
+	#endif
+
+This test-only code can be made more useful by accessing the current kunit
+test, see below.
+
+Accessing the current test
+--------------------------
+
+In some cases, you need to call test-only code from outside the test file, e.g.
+like in the example above or if you're providing a fake implementation of an
+ops struct.
+There is a ``kunit_test`` field in ``task_struct``, so you can access it via
+``current->kunit_test``.
+
+Here's a slightly in-depth example of how one could implement "mocking":
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	#include <linux/sched.h> /* for current */
+
+	struct test_data {
+		int foo_result;
+		int want_foo_called_with;
+	};
+
+	static int fake_foo(int arg)
+	{
+		struct kunit *test = current->kunit_test;
+		struct test_data *test_data = test->priv;
+
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_data->want_foo_called_with, arg);
+		return test_data->foo_result;
+	}
+
+	static void example_simple_test(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		/* Assume priv is allocated in the suite's .init */
+		struct test_data *test_data = test->priv;
+
+		test_data->foo_result = 42;
+		test_data->want_foo_called_with = 1;
+
+		/* In a real test, we'd probably pass a pointer to fake_foo somewhere
+		 * like an ops struct, etc. instead of calling it directly. */
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_foo(1), 42);
+	}
+
+
+Note: here we're able to get away with using ``test->priv``, but if you wanted
+something more flexible you could use a named ``kunit_resource``, see
+Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst.
+
+Failing the current test
+------------------------
+
+But sometimes, you might just want to fail the current test. In that case, we
+have ``kunit_fail_current_test(fmt, args...)`` which is defined in ``<kunit/test-bug.h>`` and
+doesn't require pulling in ``<kunit/test.h>``.
+
+E.g. say we had an option to enable some extra debug checks on some data structure:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	#include <kunit/test-bug.h>
+
+	#ifdef CONFIG_EXTRA_DEBUG_CHECKS
+	static void validate_my_data(struct data *data)
+	{
+		if (is_valid(data))
+			return;
+
+		kunit_fail_current_test("data %p is invalid", data);
+
+		/* Normal, non-KUnit, error reporting code here. */
+	}
+	#else
+	static void my_debug_function(void) { }
+	#endif
+
+
+Customizing error messages
+--------------------------
+
+Each of the ``KUNIT_EXPECT`` and ``KUNIT_ASSERT`` macros have a ``_MSG`` variant.
+These take a format string and arguments to provide additional context to the automatically generated error messages.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	char some_str[41];
+	generate_sha1_hex_string(some_str);
+
+	/* Before. Not easy to tell why the test failed. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, strlen(some_str), 40);
+
+	/* After. Now we see the offending string. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, strlen(some_str), 40, "some_str='%s'", some_str);
+
+Alternatively, one can take full control over the error message by using ``KUNIT_FAIL()``, e.g.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	/* Before */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, some_setup_function(), 0);
+
+	/* After: full control over the failure message. */
+	if (some_setup_function())
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to setup thing for testing");
+
+Next Steps
+==========
+*   Optional: see the Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst page for a more
+    in-depth explanation of KUnit.
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2737863ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,705 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+Writing Tests
+=============
+
+Test Cases
+----------
+
+The fundamental unit in KUnit is the test case. A test case is a function with
+the signature ``void (*)(struct kunit *test)``. It calls the function under test
+and then sets *expectations* for what should happen. For example:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	void example_test_success(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+	}
+
+	void example_test_failure(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "This test never passes.");
+	}
+
+In the above example, ``example_test_success`` always passes because it does
+nothing; no expectations are set, and therefore all expectations pass. On the
+other hand ``example_test_failure`` always fails because it calls ``KUNIT_FAIL``,
+which is a special expectation that logs a message and causes the test case to
+fail.
+
+Expectations
+~~~~~~~~~~~~
+An *expectation* specifies that we expect a piece of code to do something in a
+test. An expectation is called like a function. A test is made by setting
+expectations about the behavior of a piece of code under test. When one or more
+expectations fail, the test case fails and information about the failure is
+logged. For example:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	void add_test_basic(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, add(1, 0));
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2, add(1, 1));
+	}
+
+In the above example, ``add_test_basic`` makes a number of assertions about the
+behavior of a function called ``add``. The first parameter is always of type
+``struct kunit *``, which contains information about the current test context.
+The second parameter, in this case, is what the value is expected to be. The
+last value is what the value actually is. If ``add`` passes all of these
+expectations, the test case, ``add_test_basic`` will pass; if any one of these
+expectations fails, the test case will fail.
+
+A test case *fails* when any expectation is violated; however, the test will
+continue to run, and try other expectations until the test case ends or is
+otherwise terminated. This is as opposed to *assertions* which are discussed
+later.
+
+To learn about more KUnit expectations, see Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst.
+
+.. note::
+   A single test case should be short, easy to understand, and focused on a
+   single behavior.
+
+For example, if we want to rigorously test the ``add`` function above, create
+additional tests cases which would test each property that an ``add`` function
+should have as shown below:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	void add_test_basic(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, add(1, 0));
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2, add(1, 1));
+	}
+
+	void add_test_negative(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, add(-1, 1));
+	}
+
+	void add_test_max(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, INT_MAX, add(0, INT_MAX));
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1, add(INT_MAX, INT_MIN));
+	}
+
+	void add_test_overflow(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, INT_MIN, add(INT_MAX, 1));
+	}
+
+Assertions
+~~~~~~~~~~
+
+An assertion is like an expectation, except that the assertion immediately
+terminates the test case if the condition is not satisfied. For example:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	static void test_sort(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		int *a, i, r = 1;
+		a = kunit_kmalloc_array(test, TEST_LEN, sizeof(*a), GFP_KERNEL);
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, a);
+		for (i = 0; i < TEST_LEN; i++) {
+			r = (r * 725861) % 6599;
+			a[i] = r;
+		}
+		sort(a, TEST_LEN, sizeof(*a), cmpint, NULL);
+		for (i = 0; i < TEST_LEN-1; i++)
+			KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, a[i], a[i + 1]);
+	}
+
+In this example, the method under test should return pointer to a value. If the
+pointer returns null or an errno, we want to stop the test since the following
+expectation could crash the test case. `ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(...)` allows us
+to bail out of the test case if the appropriate conditions are not satisfied to
+complete the test.
+
+Test Suites
+~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+We need many test cases covering all the unit's behaviors. It is common to have
+many similar tests. In order to reduce duplication in these closely related
+tests, most unit testing frameworks (including KUnit) provide the concept of a
+*test suite*. A test suite is a collection of test cases for a unit of code
+with optional setup and teardown functions that run before/after the whole
+suite and/or every test case. For example:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	static struct kunit_case example_test_cases[] = {
+		KUNIT_CASE(example_test_foo),
+		KUNIT_CASE(example_test_bar),
+		KUNIT_CASE(example_test_baz),
+		{}
+	};
+
+	static struct kunit_suite example_test_suite = {
+		.name = "example",
+		.init = example_test_init,
+		.exit = example_test_exit,
+		.suite_init = example_suite_init,
+		.suite_exit = example_suite_exit,
+		.test_cases = example_test_cases,
+	};
+	kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite);
+
+In the above example, the test suite ``example_test_suite`` would first run
+``example_suite_init``, then run the test cases ``example_test_foo``,
+``example_test_bar``, and ``example_test_baz``. Each would have
+``example_test_init`` called immediately before it and ``example_test_exit``
+called immediately after it. Finally, ``example_suite_exit`` would be called
+after everything else. ``kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite)`` registers the
+test suite with the KUnit test framework.
+
+.. note::
+   A test case will only run if it is associated with a test suite.
+
+``kunit_test_suite(...)`` is a macro which tells the linker to put the
+specified test suite in a special linker section so that it can be run by KUnit
+either after ``late_init``, or when the test module is loaded (if the test was
+built as a module).
+
+For more information, see Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst.
+
+.. _kunit-on-non-uml:
+
+Writing Tests For Other Architectures
+-------------------------------------
+
+It is better to write tests that run on UML to tests that only run under a
+particular architecture. It is better to write tests that run under QEMU or
+another easy to obtain (and monetarily free) software environment to a specific
+piece of hardware.
+
+Nevertheless, there are still valid reasons to write a test that is architecture
+or hardware specific. For example, we might want to test code that really
+belongs in ``arch/some-arch/*``. Even so, try to write the test so that it does
+not depend on physical hardware. Some of our test cases may not need hardware,
+only few tests actually require the hardware to test it. When hardware is not
+available, instead of disabling tests, we can skip them.
+
+Now that we have narrowed down exactly what bits are hardware specific, the
+actual procedure for writing and running the tests is same as writing normal
+KUnit tests.
+
+.. important::
+   We may have to reset hardware state. If this is not possible, we may only
+   be able to run one test case per invocation.
+
+.. TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Add an actual example of an architecture-
+   dependent KUnit test.
+
+Common Patterns
+===============
+
+Isolating Behavior
+------------------
+
+Unit testing limits the amount of code under test to a single unit. It controls
+what code gets run when the unit under test calls a function. Where a function
+is exposed as part of an API such that the definition of that function can be
+changed without affecting the rest of the code base. In the kernel, this comes
+from two constructs: classes, which are structs that contain function pointers
+provided by the implementer, and architecture-specific functions, which have
+definitions selected at compile time.
+
+Classes
+~~~~~~~
+
+Classes are not a construct that is built into the C programming language;
+however, it is an easily derived concept. Accordingly, in most cases, every
+project that does not use a standardized object oriented library (like GNOME's
+GObject) has their own slightly different way of doing object oriented
+programming; the Linux kernel is no exception.
+
+The central concept in kernel object oriented programming is the class. In the
+kernel, a *class* is a struct that contains function pointers. This creates a
+contract between *implementers* and *users* since it forces them to use the
+same function signature without having to call the function directly. To be a
+class, the function pointers must specify that a pointer to the class, known as
+a *class handle*, be one of the parameters. Thus the member functions (also
+known as *methods*) have access to member variables (also known as *fields*)
+allowing the same implementation to have multiple *instances*.
+
+A class can be *overridden* by *child classes* by embedding the *parent class*
+in the child class. Then when the child class *method* is called, the child
+implementation knows that the pointer passed to it is of a parent contained
+within the child. Thus, the child can compute the pointer to itself because the
+pointer to the parent is always a fixed offset from the pointer to the child.
+This offset is the offset of the parent contained in the child struct. For
+example:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	struct shape {
+		int (*area)(struct shape *this);
+	};
+
+	struct rectangle {
+		struct shape parent;
+		int length;
+		int width;
+	};
+
+	int rectangle_area(struct shape *this)
+	{
+		struct rectangle *self = container_of(this, struct rectangle, parent);
+
+		return self->length * self->width;
+	};
+
+	void rectangle_new(struct rectangle *self, int length, int width)
+	{
+		self->parent.area = rectangle_area;
+		self->length = length;
+		self->width = width;
+	}
+
+In this example, computing the pointer to the child from the pointer to the
+parent is done by ``container_of``.
+
+Faking Classes
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+In order to unit test a piece of code that calls a method in a class, the
+behavior of the method must be controllable, otherwise the test ceases to be a
+unit test and becomes an integration test.
+
+A fake class implements a piece of code that is different than what runs in a
+production instance, but behaves identical from the standpoint of the callers.
+This is done to replace a dependency that is hard to deal with, or is slow. For
+example, implementing a fake EEPROM that stores the "contents" in an
+internal buffer. Assume we have a class that represents an EEPROM:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	struct eeprom {
+		ssize_t (*read)(struct eeprom *this, size_t offset, char *buffer, size_t count);
+		ssize_t (*write)(struct eeprom *this, size_t offset, const char *buffer, size_t count);
+	};
+
+And we want to test code that buffers writes to the EEPROM:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	struct eeprom_buffer {
+		ssize_t (*write)(struct eeprom_buffer *this, const char *buffer, size_t count);
+		int flush(struct eeprom_buffer *this);
+		size_t flush_count; /* Flushes when buffer exceeds flush_count. */
+	};
+
+	struct eeprom_buffer *new_eeprom_buffer(struct eeprom *eeprom);
+	void destroy_eeprom_buffer(struct eeprom *eeprom);
+
+We can test this code by *faking out* the underlying EEPROM:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	struct fake_eeprom {
+		struct eeprom parent;
+		char contents[FAKE_EEPROM_CONTENTS_SIZE];
+	};
+
+	ssize_t fake_eeprom_read(struct eeprom *parent, size_t offset, char *buffer, size_t count)
+	{
+		struct fake_eeprom *this = container_of(parent, struct fake_eeprom, parent);
+
+		count = min(count, FAKE_EEPROM_CONTENTS_SIZE - offset);
+		memcpy(buffer, this->contents + offset, count);
+
+		return count;
+	}
+
+	ssize_t fake_eeprom_write(struct eeprom *parent, size_t offset, const char *buffer, size_t count)
+	{
+		struct fake_eeprom *this = container_of(parent, struct fake_eeprom, parent);
+
+		count = min(count, FAKE_EEPROM_CONTENTS_SIZE - offset);
+		memcpy(this->contents + offset, buffer, count);
+
+		return count;
+	}
+
+	void fake_eeprom_init(struct fake_eeprom *this)
+	{
+		this->parent.read = fake_eeprom_read;
+		this->parent.write = fake_eeprom_write;
+		memset(this->contents, 0, FAKE_EEPROM_CONTENTS_SIZE);
+	}
+
+We can now use it to test ``struct eeprom_buffer``:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	struct eeprom_buffer_test {
+		struct fake_eeprom *fake_eeprom;
+		struct eeprom_buffer *eeprom_buffer;
+	};
+
+	static void eeprom_buffer_test_does_not_write_until_flush(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		struct eeprom_buffer_test *ctx = test->priv;
+		struct eeprom_buffer *eeprom_buffer = ctx->eeprom_buffer;
+		struct fake_eeprom *fake_eeprom = ctx->fake_eeprom;
+		char buffer[] = {0xff};
+
+		eeprom_buffer->flush_count = SIZE_MAX;
+
+		eeprom_buffer->write(eeprom_buffer, buffer, 1);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_eeprom->contents[0], 0);
+
+		eeprom_buffer->write(eeprom_buffer, buffer, 1);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_eeprom->contents[1], 0);
+
+		eeprom_buffer->flush(eeprom_buffer);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_eeprom->contents[0], 0xff);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_eeprom->contents[1], 0xff);
+	}
+
+	static void eeprom_buffer_test_flushes_after_flush_count_met(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		struct eeprom_buffer_test *ctx = test->priv;
+		struct eeprom_buffer *eeprom_buffer = ctx->eeprom_buffer;
+		struct fake_eeprom *fake_eeprom = ctx->fake_eeprom;
+		char buffer[] = {0xff};
+
+		eeprom_buffer->flush_count = 2;
+
+		eeprom_buffer->write(eeprom_buffer, buffer, 1);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_eeprom->contents[0], 0);
+
+		eeprom_buffer->write(eeprom_buffer, buffer, 1);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_eeprom->contents[0], 0xff);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_eeprom->contents[1], 0xff);
+	}
+
+	static void eeprom_buffer_test_flushes_increments_of_flush_count(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		struct eeprom_buffer_test *ctx = test->priv;
+		struct eeprom_buffer *eeprom_buffer = ctx->eeprom_buffer;
+		struct fake_eeprom *fake_eeprom = ctx->fake_eeprom;
+		char buffer[] = {0xff, 0xff};
+
+		eeprom_buffer->flush_count = 2;
+
+		eeprom_buffer->write(eeprom_buffer, buffer, 1);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_eeprom->contents[0], 0);
+
+		eeprom_buffer->write(eeprom_buffer, buffer, 2);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_eeprom->contents[0], 0xff);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_eeprom->contents[1], 0xff);
+		/* Should have only flushed the first two bytes. */
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_eeprom->contents[2], 0);
+	}
+
+	static int eeprom_buffer_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		struct eeprom_buffer_test *ctx;
+
+		ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
+
+		ctx->fake_eeprom = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx->fake_eeprom), GFP_KERNEL);
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->fake_eeprom);
+		fake_eeprom_init(ctx->fake_eeprom);
+
+		ctx->eeprom_buffer = new_eeprom_buffer(&ctx->fake_eeprom->parent);
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->eeprom_buffer);
+
+		test->priv = ctx;
+
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	static void eeprom_buffer_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		struct eeprom_buffer_test *ctx = test->priv;
+
+		destroy_eeprom_buffer(ctx->eeprom_buffer);
+	}
+
+Testing Against Multiple Inputs
+-------------------------------
+
+Testing just a few inputs is not enough to ensure that the code works correctly,
+for example: testing a hash function.
+
+We can write a helper macro or function. The function is called for each input.
+For example, to test ``sha1sum(1)``, we can write:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	#define TEST_SHA1(in, want) \
+		sha1sum(in, out); \
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, want, "sha1sum(%s)", in);
+
+	char out[40];
+	TEST_SHA1("hello world",  "2aae6c35c94fcfb415dbe95f408b9ce91ee846ed");
+	TEST_SHA1("hello world!", "430ce34d020724ed75a196dfc2ad67c77772d169");
+
+Note the use of the ``_MSG`` version of ``KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ`` to print a more
+detailed error and make the assertions clearer within the helper macros.
+
+The ``_MSG`` variants are useful when the same expectation is called multiple
+times (in a loop or helper function) and thus the line number is not enough to
+identify what failed, as shown below.
+
+In complicated cases, we recommend using a *table-driven test* compared to the
+helper macro variation, for example:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	int i;
+	char out[40];
+
+	struct sha1_test_case {
+		const char *str;
+		const char *sha1;
+	};
+
+	struct sha1_test_case cases[] = {
+		{
+			.str = "hello world",
+			.sha1 = "2aae6c35c94fcfb415dbe95f408b9ce91ee846ed",
+		},
+		{
+			.str = "hello world!",
+			.sha1 = "430ce34d020724ed75a196dfc2ad67c77772d169",
+		},
+	};
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cases); ++i) {
+		sha1sum(cases[i].str, out);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, cases[i].sha1,
+		                      "sha1sum(%s)", cases[i].str);
+	}
+
+
+There is more boilerplate code involved, but it can:
+
+* be more readable when there are multiple inputs/outputs (due to field names).
+
+  * For example, see ``fs/ext4/inode-test.c``.
+
+* reduce duplication if test cases are shared across multiple tests.
+
+  * For example: if we want to test ``sha256sum``, we could add a ``sha256``
+    field and reuse ``cases``.
+
+* be converted to a "parameterized test".
+
+Parameterized Testing
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The table-driven testing pattern is common enough that KUnit has special
+support for it.
+
+By reusing the same ``cases`` array from above, we can write the test as a
+"parameterized test" with the following.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	// This is copy-pasted from above.
+	struct sha1_test_case {
+		const char *str;
+		const char *sha1;
+	};
+	const struct sha1_test_case cases[] = {
+		{
+			.str = "hello world",
+			.sha1 = "2aae6c35c94fcfb415dbe95f408b9ce91ee846ed",
+		},
+		{
+			.str = "hello world!",
+			.sha1 = "430ce34d020724ed75a196dfc2ad67c77772d169",
+		},
+	};
+
+	// Need a helper function to generate a name for each test case.
+	static void case_to_desc(const struct sha1_test_case *t, char *desc)
+	{
+		strcpy(desc, t->str);
+	}
+	// Creates `sha1_gen_params()` to iterate over `cases`.
+	KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(sha1, cases, case_to_desc);
+
+	// Looks no different from a normal test.
+	static void sha1_test(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		// This function can just contain the body of the for-loop.
+		// The former `cases[i]` is accessible under test->param_value.
+		char out[40];
+		struct sha1_test_case *test_param = (struct sha1_test_case *)(test->param_value);
+
+		sha1sum(test_param->str, out);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, test_param->sha1,
+				      "sha1sum(%s)", test_param->str);
+	}
+
+	// Instead of KUNIT_CASE, we use KUNIT_CASE_PARAM and pass in the
+	// function declared by KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM.
+	static struct kunit_case sha1_test_cases[] = {
+		KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(sha1_test, sha1_gen_params),
+		{}
+	};
+
+Exiting Early on Failed Expectations
+------------------------------------
+
+We can use ``KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ`` to mark the test as failed and continue
+execution.  In some cases, it is unsafe to continue. We can use the
+``KUNIT_ASSERT`` variant to exit on failure.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	void example_test_user_alloc_function(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		void *object = alloc_some_object_for_me();
+
+		/* Make sure we got a valid pointer back. */
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, object);
+		do_something_with_object(object);
+	}
+
+Allocating Memory
+-----------------
+
+Where you might use ``kzalloc``, you can instead use ``kunit_kzalloc`` as KUnit
+will then ensure that the memory is freed once the test completes.
+
+This is useful because it lets us use the ``KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ`` macros to exit
+early from a test without having to worry about remembering to call ``kfree``.
+For example:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	void example_test_allocation(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		char *buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, 16, GFP_KERNEL);
+		/* Ensure allocation succeeded. */
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
+
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ(test, buffer, "");
+	}
+
+
+Testing Static Functions
+------------------------
+
+If we do not want to expose functions or variables for testing, one option is to
+conditionally ``#include`` the test file at the end of your .c file. For
+example:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	/* In my_file.c */
+
+	static int do_interesting_thing();
+
+	#ifdef CONFIG_MY_KUNIT_TEST
+	#include "my_kunit_test.c"
+	#endif
+
+Injecting Test-Only Code
+------------------------
+
+Similar to as shown above, we can add test-specific logic. For example:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	/* In my_file.h */
+
+	#ifdef CONFIG_MY_KUNIT_TEST
+	/* Defined in my_kunit_test.c */
+	void test_only_hook(void);
+	#else
+	void test_only_hook(void) { }
+	#endif
+
+This test-only code can be made more useful by accessing the current ``kunit_test``
+as shown in next section: *Accessing The Current Test*.
+
+Accessing The Current Test
+--------------------------
+
+In some cases, we need to call test-only code from outside the test file.
+For example, see example in section *Injecting Test-Only Code* or if
+we are providing a fake implementation of an ops struct. Using
+``kunit_test`` field in ``task_struct``, we can access it via
+``current->kunit_test``.
+
+The example below includes how to implement "mocking":
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	#include <linux/sched.h> /* for current */
+
+	struct test_data {
+		int foo_result;
+		int want_foo_called_with;
+	};
+
+	static int fake_foo(int arg)
+	{
+		struct kunit *test = current->kunit_test;
+		struct test_data *test_data = test->priv;
+
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_data->want_foo_called_with, arg);
+		return test_data->foo_result;
+	}
+
+	static void example_simple_test(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		/* Assume priv (private, a member used to pass test data from
+		 * the init function) is allocated in the suite's .init */
+		struct test_data *test_data = test->priv;
+
+		test_data->foo_result = 42;
+		test_data->want_foo_called_with = 1;
+
+		/* In a real test, we'd probably pass a pointer to fake_foo somewhere
+		 * like an ops struct, etc. instead of calling it directly. */
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_foo(1), 42);
+	}
+
+In this example, we are using the ``priv`` member of ``struct kunit`` as a way
+of passing data to the test from the init function. In general ``priv`` is
+pointer that can be used for any user data. This is preferred over static
+variables, as it avoids concurrency issues.
+
+Had we wanted something more flexible, we could have used a named ``kunit_resource``.
+Each test can have multiple resources which have string names providing the same
+flexibility as a ``priv`` member, but also, for example, allowing helper
+functions to create resources without conflicting with each other. It is also
+possible to define a clean up function for each resource, making it easy to
+avoid resource leaks. For more information, see Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst.
+
+Failing The Current Test
+------------------------
+
+If we want to fail the current test, we can use ``kunit_fail_current_test(fmt, args...)``
+which is defined in ``<kunit/test-bug.h>`` and does not require pulling in ``<kunit/test.h>``.
+For example, we have an option to enable some extra debug checks on some data
+structures as shown below:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	#include <kunit/test-bug.h>
+
+	#ifdef CONFIG_EXTRA_DEBUG_CHECKS
+	static void validate_my_data(struct data *data)
+	{
+		if (is_valid(data))
+			return;
+
+		kunit_fail_current_test("data %p is invalid", data);
+
+		/* Normal, non-KUnit, error reporting code here. */
+	}
+	#else
+	static void my_debug_function(void) { }
+	#endif
+