1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
(function () {
QUnit.module("Multi-domain first parties");
let mdfp = require('multiDomainFP');
QUnit.test('isMultiDomainFirstParty test', function (assert) {
let testData = [
['foo.bar', 'yep.com', 'maybe.idk'],
['related.com', 'larry.com'],
];
let isMdfp = mdfp.makeIsMultiDomainFirstParty(mdfp.makeDomainLookup(testData));
assert.ok(
isMdfp('yep.com', 'maybe.idk'),
"these are related domains according to test data"
);
assert.ok(
isMdfp('maybe.idk', 'yep.com'),
"the domains are related regardless of ordering"
);
assert.ok(
isMdfp('related.com', 'larry.com'),
"these should also be related domains, from a different set in test data"
);
assert.notOk(
isMdfp('yep.com', 'related.com'),
"these domains are both present in test data but should not be related"
);
assert.notOk(
isMdfp('larry.com', 'yep.com'),
"these domains are also both present but should be unrelated"
);
assert.notOk(
isMdfp('yep.com', 'google.com'),
"one of these domains is not in test data"
);
assert.notOk(
isMdfp('reddit.com', 'eff.org'),
"both domains are not in test data"
);
});
// "lint" our MDFP definitions to avoid accidentally adding PSL domains
// for example:
// https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadger/pull/1550#pullrequestreview-54480652
QUnit.test('MDFP domains are all base domains', (assert) => {
for (let group of mdfp.multiDomainFirstPartiesArray) {
for (let domain of group) {
assert.ok(
window.getBaseDomain('fakesubdomain.' + domain) == domain,
domain + ' is a base domain (eTLD+1)'
);
}
}
});
// lint for duplicates
QUnit.test('MDFP domains do not contain duplicates', (assert) => {
let domains = new Set();
for (let group of mdfp.multiDomainFirstPartiesArray) {
for (let domain of group) {
assert.notOk(
domains.has(domain),
domain + ' does not appear more than once'
);
domains.add(domain);
}
}
});
}());
|
