Troubleshooting tips and FAQ for Sudo ===================================== #### When I run configure, it says "C compiler cannot create executables". > This usually means you either don't have a working compiler. This > could be due to the lack of a license or that some component of the > compiler suite could not be found. Check config.log for clues as > to why this is happening. On many systems, compiler components live > in /usr/ccs/bin which may not be in your PATH environment variable. #### When I run configure, it says "sudo requires the 'ar' utility to build". > As part of the build process, sudo creates a temporary library > containing objects that are shared amongst the different sudo > executables. On Unix systems, the 'ar' utility is used to do this. > This error indicates that 'ar' is missing on your system. On Solaris > systems, you may need to install the SUNWbtool package. On other > systems 'ar' may be included in the GNU binutils package. #### Sudo compiles and installs successfully but when I try to run it I get: The "no new privileges" flag is set, which prevents sudo from running as root. If sudo is running in a container, you may need to adjust the container configuration to disable the flag. > Sudo was run by a process that has the Linux "no new privileges" > flag set. This causes the set-user-ID bit to be ignored when running > an executable, which will prevent sudo from functioning. The most > likely cause for this is running sudo within a container that sets > this flag. Check the documentation to see if it is possible to > configure the container such that the flag is not set. #### Sudo compiles and installs successfully but when I try to run it I get: /usr/local/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set > Sudo must be set-user-ID root to do its work. Either `/usr/local/bin/sudo` > is not owned by user-ID 0 or the set-user-ID bit is not set. This should > have been done for you by `make install` but you can fix it manually by > running the following as root: chown root /usr/local/bin/sudo; chmod 4755 /usr/local/bin/sudo #### Sudo compiles and installs successfully but when I try to run it I get: effective uid is not 0, is /usr/local/bin/sudo on a file system with the 'nosuid' option set or an NFS file system without root privileges? > The owner and permissions on the sudo binary appear to be OK but when > sudo ran, the set-user-ID bit did not have an effect. There are two > common causes for this. The first is that the file system the sudo > binary is located on is mounted with the 'nosuid' mount option, which > disables set-user-ID binaries. The output of the 'mount' command should > tell you if the file system is mounted with the 'nosuid' option. The > other possible cause is that sudo is installed on an NFS-mounted file > system that is exported without root privileges. By default, NFS file > systems are exported with user-ID 0 mapped to a non-privileged ID (usually > -2). You should be able to determine whether sudo is located on an > NFS-mounted filesystem by running "df \`which sudo\`". #### Sudo never gives me a chance to enter a password using PAM It just says "Sorry, try again." three times and exits. > You didn't setup PAM to work with sudo. On RedHat or Fedora Linux > this generally means installing the sample pam.conf file as > /etc/pam.d/sudo. See the example pam.conf file for hints on what > to use for other Linux systems. #### Sudo says my account has expired but I know it has not > If you get the following error from sudo: Account expired or PAM config lacks an 'account' section for sudo, contact your system administrator` > double-check the `/etc/shadow` file to verify that the target user > (for example, root) does not have the password expiration field set. > A common way to disable access to an account is to set the expiration > date to 1, such as via `usermod -e 1`. If the account is marked as > expired, sudo will not allow you to access it. > > If, however, the account has not expired, it is possible that the PAM > configuration lacks an 'account' specification. On Linux this usually > means you are missing a line in /etc/pam.d/sudo similar to: account required pam_unix.so #### Sudo is configured use syslog but nothing gets logged > Make sure you have an entry in your syslog.conf file to save > the sudo messages (see the example syslog.conf file). The default > log facility is authpriv (changeable via configure or in sudoers). > Don't forget to send a SIGHUP to your syslogd so that it re-reads > its conf file. Also, remember that syslogd does *not* create > log files, you need to create the file before syslogd will log > to it (e.g.: touch /var/log/sudo). > The facility (e.g. 'auth.debug') must be separated from > the destination (e.g. '/var/log/auth' or '@loghost') by tabs, > *not* spaces. This is a common error. #### Sudo won't accept my password, even when entered correctly > If you are not using pam and your system uses shadow passwords, > it is possible that sudo didn't properly detect that shadow > passwords are in use. Take a look at the generated config.h > file and verify that the C function used for shadow password > look ups was detected. For instance, for SVR4-style shadow > passwords, `HAVE_GETSPNAM` should be defined (you can search for > the string 'shadow passwords' in config.h with your editor). > There is no define needed for 4.4BSD-based shadow passwords > which just use the standard getpw* routines. #### Can sudo use the ssh agent instead of asking for the user's password? > Not directly, but you can use a PAM module like pam_ssh_agent_auth > or pam_ssh for this purpose. #### I want to place the sudoers file in a directory other than /etc > Use the `--sysconfdir` option to configure. For example: configure --sysconfdir=/dir/you/want/sudoers/in > Alternately, you can set the path in the sudo.conf file as an > argument to the sudoers.so plugin. For example: Plugin sudoers_policy sudoers.so sudoers_file=/path/to/sudoers #### Can I put the sudoers file in NIS/NIS+? > There is no support for making an NIS/NIS+ map/table out of the sudoers > file at this time. You can distribute the sudoers file via rsync or rdist. > It is also possible to NFS-mount the sudoers file. If you use LDAP at your > site you may be interested in sudo's LDAP sudoers support, see > [README.LDAP.md](../README.LDAP.md) and the sudoers.ldap manual. #### I don't run sendmail, does this mean that I cannot use sudo? > No, you just need to disable mailing with a line like: Defaults !mailerpath > in your sudoers file or run configure with the `--without-sendmail` > option. #### How can I make visudo use a different editor? > You can specify the editor to use in visudo in the sudoers file. > See the 'editor' and 'env_editor' entries in the sudoers manual. > The defaults can also be set at configure time using the > `--with-editor` and `--with-env-editor` configure options. #### Why does sudo modify the command's environment? > By default, sudo runs commands with a new, minimal environment. > The 'env_keep' setting in sudoers can be used to control which > environment variables are preserved from the invoking user's > environment via the 'env_keep' setting in sudoers. > > While it is possible to disable the 'env_reset' setting, which > will preserve all environment variables that don't match a black > list, doing so is strongly discouraged. See the "Command > environment" section of the sudoers manual for more information. #### Why does sudo reset the HOME environment variable? > Many programs use the HOME environment variable to locate > configuration and data files. Often, these configuration files > are treated as trusted input that affects how the program operates. > By controlling the configuration files, a user may be able to > cause the program to execute other commands without sudo's > restrictions or logging. > > Some programs perform extra checks when the real and effective > user-IDs differ, but because sudo runs commands with all user-IDs > set to the target user, these checks are insufficient. > > While it is possible to preserve the value of the HOME environment > variable by adding it to the 'env_keep' list in the sudoers file, > doing so is strongly discouraged. Users wishing to edit files > with sudo should run sudoedit (or sudo -e) to get their accustomed > editor configuration instead of invoking the editor directly. #### How can I prevent sudo from asking for a password? > To specify this on a per-user (and per-command) basis, use the > 'NOPASSWD' tag right before the command list in sudoers. See > the sudoers man page and examples/sudoers for details. To disable > passwords completely, add '!authenticate' to the Defaults line > in /etc/sudoers. You can also turn off authentication on a > per-user or per-host basis using a user or host-specific Defaults > entry in sudoers. To hard-code the global default, you can > configure with the `--without-passwd` option. #### The configure scripts says `no acceptable cc found in $PATH` > /usr/ucb/cc was the only C compiler that configure could find. > You need to tell configure the path to the 'real' C compiler > via the `--with-CC option`. On Solaris, the path is probably > something like /opt/SUNWspro/SC4.0/bin/cc. If you have gcc > that will also work. #### The configure scripts says "config.cache exists from another platform!" > configure caches the results of its tests in a file called > config.cache to make re-running configure speedy. However, > if you are building sudo for a different platform the results > in config.cache will be wrong so you need to remove the config.cache file. > You can do this via `rm config.cache`, or `make realclean` to also > remove any object files and configure temp files that are present. #### When I run 'visudo' it says "sudoers file busy, try again later." > Someone else is currently editing the sudoers file with visudo. #### When I try to use 'cd' with sudo it says "cd: command not found" > 'cd' is a shell built-in command, you can't run it as a command > since a child process (sudo) cannot affect the current working > directory of the parent (your shell). #### When I try to use 'cd' with sudo nothing happens. > Even though 'cd' is a shell built-in command, some operating systems > include a /usr/bin/cd command for completeness. A standalone > "cd' command is totally useless since a child process (cd) cannot > affect the current working directory of the parent (your shell). > Thus, `sudo cd /foo` will start a child process, change the > directory and immediately exit without doing anything useful. #### How can I run a command via sudo as a user other than root? > The default user sudo tries to run things as is always root, even if > the invoking user can only run commands as a single, specific user. > This may change in the future but at the present time you have to > work around this using the 'runas_default' option in sudoers. > For example, given the following sudoers rule: bob ALL=(oracle) ALL > You can cause sudo to run all commands as 'oracle' for user 'bob' > with a sudoers entry like: Defaults:bob runas_default=oracle #### When I try to run sudo via ssh, I get an error: sudo: a terminal is required to read the password; either use the -S option to read from standard input or configure an askpass helper > If sudo needs to authenticate a user, it requires access to the user's > terminal to disable echo so the password is not displayed to the screen. > The above message indicates that no terminal was present. > When running a command via ssh, a terminal is not allocated by default > which can cause this message. The '-t' option to ssh will force it to > allocate a tty. Alternately, you may be able to use the ssh-askpass > utility to prompt for the password if X11 forwarding is enabled and an > askpass helper is configured in the sudo.conf file. If you do not mind > your password being echoed to the screen, you may use sudo's -S option > to read the password from the standard input. Alternately, you may set > the 'visiblepw' sudoers option which will allow the password to be entered > even when echo cannot be disabled, though this is not recommended. #### When I try to use SSL-enabled LDAP with sudo I get an error: unable to initialize SSL cert and key db: security library: bad database. you must set TLS_CERT in /etc/ldap.conf to use SSL > On systems that use a Mozilla-derived LDAP SDK there must be a > certificate database in place to use SSL-encrypted LDAP connections. > This file is usually /var/ldap/cert8.db or /etc/ldap/cert8.db. > The actual number after 'cert' will vary, depending on the version > of the LDAP SDK that is being used. If you do not have a certificate > database you can either copy one from a mozilla-derived browser, such > as firefox, or create one using the `certutil` command. You can run > `certutil` as follows and press the (or ) key at the > password prompt: # certutil -N -d /var/ldap > Enter a password which will be used to encrypt your keys. > The password should be at least 8 characters long, > and should contain at least one non-alphabetic character. Enter new password: Re-enter password: #### After upgrading my system, sudo_logsrvd gives the error: X509_verify_cert: CA cert does not include key usage extension > This can happen if you are using self-signed certificates that do not > include the key usage extension. This error can occur if the certificates > were generated using OpenSSL 1.x but sudo_logsrvd now uses OpenSSL 3.x, > for example after a system upgrade. The x509 certificate validation in > OpenSSL 3.x now requires that the key usage extension be present. > One way to address this is to disable certificate verification in > sudo_logsrvd by setting the _tls_verify_ key in the `[server]` section > to _false_. Alternately, you can simply remove your old CA and the > associated certificates and create a new one using an updated > `/etc/ssl/openssl.cnf` file. See the sudo_logsrvd manual for more > information on creating self-signed certificates. #### On HP-UX, the umask setting in sudoers has no effect. > If your /etc/pam.conf file has the libpam_hpsec.so.1 session module > enabled, you may need to a add line like the following to pam.conf: > sudo session required libpam_hpsec.so.1 bypass_umask #### When I run `sudo -i shell_alias` I get "command not found" > Commands run via `sudo -i` are executed by the shell in > non-interactive mode. The bash shell will only parse aliases in > interactive mode unless the 'expand_aliases' shell option is > set. If you add `shopt -s expand_aliases` to your .bash_profile > (or .profile if using that instead) the aliases should now be > available to `sudo -i`. #### When I run sudo on AIX I get the following error: setuidx(ID_EFFECTIVE|ID_REAL|ID_SAVED, ROOT_UID): Operation not permitted. > AIX's Enhanced RBAC is preventing sudo from running. To fix > this, add the following entry to /etc/security/privcmds (adjust > the path to sudo as needed) and run the setkst command as root: /usr/local/bin/sudo: accessauths = ALLOW_ALL innateprivs = PV_DAC_GID,PV_DAC_R,PV_DAC_UID,PV_DAC_X,PV_FS_CHOWN,PV_PROC_PRIO,PV_NET_PORT,PV_NET_CNTL,PV_SU_UID secflags = FSF_EPS #### Sudo builds without error but when I run it I get a Segmentation fault. > If you are on a Linux system, the first thing to try is to run > configure with the `--disable-pie` option, then `make clean` and > `make`. If that fixes the problem then your operating system > does not properly support position independent executables. > Send a message to sudo@sudo.ws with system details such as the > Linux distro, kernel version, and CPU architecture. #### When I run configure I get the following error: dlopen present but libtool doesn't appear to support your platform. > Libtool doesn't know how to support dynamic linking on the operating > system you are building for. If you are cross-compiling, you need to > specify the operating system, not just the CPU type. For example, > `--host powerpc-unknown-linux` > instead of just: > `--host powerpc` #### How do you pronounce 'sudo'? > The official pronunciation is soo-doo (for su 'do'). However, an > alternate pronunciation, a homophone of 'pseudo', is also common.