summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/taskcluster/docs/partials.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-07 17:32:43 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-07 17:32:43 +0000
commit6bf0a5cb5034a7e684dcc3500e841785237ce2dd (patch)
treea68f146d7fa01f0134297619fbe7e33db084e0aa /taskcluster/docs/partials.rst
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadthunderbird-6bf0a5cb5034a7e684dcc3500e841785237ce2dd.tar.xz
thunderbird-6bf0a5cb5034a7e684dcc3500e841785237ce2dd.zip
Adding upstream version 1:115.7.0.upstream/1%115.7.0upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'taskcluster/docs/partials.rst')
-rw-r--r--taskcluster/docs/partials.rst123
1 files changed, 123 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/taskcluster/docs/partials.rst b/taskcluster/docs/partials.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e4cb369354
--- /dev/null
+++ b/taskcluster/docs/partials.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+Partial Update Generation
+=========================
+
+Overview
+--------
+
+Windows, Mac and Linux releases have partial updates, to reduce
+the file size end-users have to download in order to receive new
+versions. These are created using a docker image, some Python,
+``mbsdiff``, and the tools in ``tools/update-packaging``
+
+The task has been called 'Funsize' for quite some time. This might
+make sense depending on what brands of chocolate bar are available
+near you.
+
+How the Task Works
+------------------
+
+Funsize uses a docker image that's built in-tree, named funsize-update-generator.
+The image contains some Python to examine the task definition and determine
+what needs to be done, but it downloads tools like ``mar`` and ``mbsdiff``
+from either locations specified in the task definition, or default mozilla-central
+locations.
+
+The 'extra' section of the task definition contains most of the payload, under
+the 'funsize' key. In here is a list of partials that this specific task will
+generate, and each entry includes the earlier (or 'from') version, and the most
+recent (or 'to') version, which for most releases will likely be a taskcluster
+artifact.
+
+.. code-block:: json
+
+ {
+ "to_mar": "https://tc.net/api/queue/v1/task/EWtBFqVuT-WqG3tGLxWhmA/artifacts/public/build/ach/target.complete.mar",
+ "product": "Firefox",
+ "dest_mar": "target-60.0b8.partial.mar",
+ "locale": "ach",
+ "from_mar": "http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/candidates/60.0b8-candidates/build1/update/linux-i686/ach/firefox-60.0b8.complete.mar",
+ "update_number": 2,
+ "platform": "linux32",
+ "previousVersion": "60.0b8",
+ "previousBuildNumber": "1",
+ "branch": "mozilla-beta"
+ }
+
+The 'update number' indicates how many released versions there are between 'to' and the current 'from'.
+For example, if we are building a partial update for the current nightly from the previous one, the update
+number will be 1. For the release before that, it will be 2. This lets us use generic output artifact
+names that we can rename in the later ``beetmover`` tasks.
+
+Inside the task, for each partial it has been told to generate, it will download, unpack and virus
+scan the 'from_mar' and 'to_mar', download the tools, and run ``make_incremental_update.sh`` from
+``tools/update-packaging``.
+
+If a scope is given for a set of temporary S3 credentials, the task will use a caching script,
+to allow re-use of the diffs made for larger files. Some of the larger files are not localised,
+and this allows us to save a lot of compute time.
+
+For Releases
+------------
+
+Partials are made as part of the ``promote`` task group. The previous
+versions used to create the update are specified in ship-it by
+Release Management.
+
+Nightly Partials
+----------------
+
+Since nightly releases don't appear in ship-it, the partials to create
+are determined in the decision task. This was controversial, and so here
+are the assumptions and reasons, so that when an alternative solution is
+discovered, we can assess it in context:
+
+1. Balrog is the source of truth for previous nightly releases.
+2. Re-running a task should produce the same results.
+3. A task's input and output should be specified in the definition.
+4. A task transform should avoid external dependencies. This is to
+ increase the number of scenarios in which 'mach taskgraph' works.
+5. A task graph doesn't explicitly know that it's intended for nightlies,
+ only that specific tasks are only present for nightly.
+6. The decision task is explicitly told that its target is nightly
+ using the target-tasks-method argument.
+
+a. From 2 and 3, this means that the partials task itself cannot query
+ balrog for the history, as it may get different results when re-run,
+ and hides the inputs and outputs from the task definition.
+b. From 4, anything run by 'mach taskgraph' is an inappropriate place
+ to query Balrog, even if it results in a repeatable task graph.
+c. Since these restrictions don't apply to the decision task, and given
+ 6, we can query Balrog in the decision task if the target-tasks-method
+ given contains 'nightly', such as 'nightly_desktop' or 'nightly_linux'
+
+Using the decision task involves making fewer, larger queries to Balrog,
+and storing the results for task graph regeneration and later audit. At
+the moment this data is stored in the ``parameters`` under the label
+``release_history``, since the parameters are an existing method for
+passing data to the task transforms, but a case could be made
+for adding a separate store, as it's a significantly larger number of
+records than anything else in the parameters.
+
+Nightly Partials and Beetmover
+------------------------------
+
+A release for a specific platform and locale may not have a history of
+prior releases that can be used to build partial updates. This could be
+for a variety of reasons, such as a new locale, or a hiatus in nightly
+releases creating too long a gap in the history.
+
+This means that the ``partials`` and ``partials-signing`` tasks may have
+nothing to do for a platform and locale. If this is true, then the tasks
+are filtered out in the ``transform``.
+
+This does mean that the downstream task, ``beetmover-repackage`` can not
+rely on the ``partials-signing`` task existing. It depends on both the
+``partials-signing`` and ``repackage-signing`` task, and chooses which
+to depend on in the transform.
+
+If there is a history in the ``parameters`` ``release_history`` section
+then ``beetmover-repackage`` will depend on ``partials-signing``.
+Otherwise, it will depend on ``repackage-signing``.
+
+This is not ideal, as it results in unclear logic in the task graph
+generation. It will be improved.