diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 17:32:43 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 17:32:43 +0000 |
commit | 6bf0a5cb5034a7e684dcc3500e841785237ce2dd (patch) | |
tree | a68f146d7fa01f0134297619fbe7e33db084e0aa /tools/profiler/tests/browser/browser_test_marker_network_redirect.js | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | thunderbird-6bf0a5cb5034a7e684dcc3500e841785237ce2dd.tar.xz thunderbird-6bf0a5cb5034a7e684dcc3500e841785237ce2dd.zip |
Adding upstream version 1:115.7.0.upstream/1%115.7.0upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/profiler/tests/browser/browser_test_marker_network_redirect.js | 341 |
1 files changed, 341 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/profiler/tests/browser/browser_test_marker_network_redirect.js b/tools/profiler/tests/browser/browser_test_marker_network_redirect.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..28478c2b3b --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/profiler/tests/browser/browser_test_marker_network_redirect.js @@ -0,0 +1,341 @@ +/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public + * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this + * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */ + +/** + * Test that we emit network markers accordingly. + * In this file we'll test the redirect cases. + */ +add_task(async function test_network_markers_service_worker_setup() { + // Disabling cache makes the result more predictable especially in verify mode. + await SpecialPowers.pushPrefEnv({ + set: [ + ["browser.cache.disk.enable", false], + ["browser.cache.memory.enable", false], + ], + }); +}); + +add_task(async function test_network_markers_redirect_simple() { + // In this test, we request an HTML page that gets redirected. This is a + // top-level navigation. + Assert.ok( + !Services.profiler.IsActive(), + "The profiler is not currently active" + ); + + startProfilerForMarkerTests(); + + const targetFileNameWithCacheBust = "simple.html"; + const url = + BASE_URL + + "redirect.sjs?" + + encodeURIComponent(targetFileNameWithCacheBust); + const targetUrl = BASE_URL + targetFileNameWithCacheBust; + + await BrowserTestUtils.withNewTab(url, async contentBrowser => { + const contentPid = await SpecialPowers.spawn( + contentBrowser, + [], + () => Services.appinfo.processID + ); + + const { parentThread, contentThread } = await stopProfilerNowAndGetThreads( + contentPid + ); + + const parentNetworkMarkers = getInflatedNetworkMarkers(parentThread); + const contentNetworkMarkers = getInflatedNetworkMarkers(contentThread); + info(JSON.stringify(parentNetworkMarkers, null, 2)); + info(JSON.stringify(contentNetworkMarkers, null, 2)); + + Assert.equal( + parentNetworkMarkers.length, + 4, + `We should get 2 pairs of network markers in the parent thread.` + ); + + /* It looks like that for a redirection for the top level navigation, the + * content thread sees the markers for the second request only. + * See Bug 1692879. */ + Assert.equal( + contentNetworkMarkers.length, + 2, + `We should get one pair of network markers in the content thread.` + ); + + const parentRedirectMarker = parentNetworkMarkers[1]; + const parentStopMarker = parentNetworkMarkers[3]; + // There's no content redirect marker for the reason outlined above. + const contentStopMarker = contentNetworkMarkers[1]; + + Assert.objectContains(parentRedirectMarker, { + name: Expect.stringMatches(`Load \\d+:.*${escapeStringRegexp(url)}`), + data: Expect.objectContainsOnly({ + type: "Network", + status: "STATUS_REDIRECT", + URI: url, + RedirectURI: targetUrl, + requestMethod: "GET", + contentType: null, + startTime: Expect.number(), + endTime: Expect.number(), + domainLookupStart: Expect.number(), + domainLookupEnd: Expect.number(), + connectStart: Expect.number(), + tcpConnectEnd: Expect.number(), + connectEnd: Expect.number(), + requestStart: Expect.number(), + responseStart: Expect.number(), + responseEnd: Expect.number(), + id: Expect.number(), + redirectId: parentStopMarker.data.id, + pri: Expect.number(), + cache: Expect.stringMatches(/Missed|Unresolved/), + redirectType: "Permanent", + isHttpToHttpsRedirect: false, + }), + }); + + const expectedProperties = { + name: Expect.stringMatches( + `Load \\d+:.*${escapeStringRegexp(targetUrl)}` + ), + }; + const expectedDataProperties = { + type: "Network", + status: "STATUS_STOP", + URI: targetUrl, + requestMethod: "GET", + contentType: "text/html", + startTime: Expect.number(), + endTime: Expect.number(), + domainLookupStart: Expect.number(), + domainLookupEnd: Expect.number(), + connectStart: Expect.number(), + tcpConnectEnd: Expect.number(), + connectEnd: Expect.number(), + requestStart: Expect.number(), + responseStart: Expect.number(), + responseEnd: Expect.number(), + id: Expect.number(), + count: Expect.number(), + pri: Expect.number(), + }; + + Assert.objectContains(parentStopMarker, expectedProperties); + Assert.objectContains(contentStopMarker, expectedProperties); + + // The cache information is missing from the content marker, it's only part + // of the parent marker. See Bug 1544821. + Assert.objectContainsOnly(parentStopMarker.data, { + ...expectedDataProperties, + // Because the request races with the cache, these 2 values are valid: + // "Missed" when the cache answered before we get a result from the network. + // "Unresolved" when we got a response from the network before the cache subsystem. + cache: Expect.stringMatches(/^(Missed|Unresolved)$/), + }); + Assert.objectContainsOnly(contentStopMarker.data, expectedDataProperties); + }); +}); + +add_task(async function test_network_markers_redirect_resources() { + // In this test we request an HTML file that itself contains resources that + // are redirected. + Assert.ok( + !Services.profiler.IsActive(), + "The profiler is not currently active" + ); + + startProfilerForMarkerTests(); + + const url = BASE_URL + "page_with_resources.html?cacheBust=" + Math.random(); + await BrowserTestUtils.withNewTab(url, async contentBrowser => { + const contentPid = await SpecialPowers.spawn( + contentBrowser, + [], + () => Services.appinfo.processID + ); + + const { parentThread, contentThread } = await stopProfilerNowAndGetThreads( + contentPid + ); + + const parentNetworkMarkers = getInflatedNetworkMarkers(parentThread); + const contentNetworkMarkers = getInflatedNetworkMarkers(contentThread); + info(JSON.stringify(parentNetworkMarkers, null, 2)); + info(JSON.stringify(contentNetworkMarkers, null, 2)); + + Assert.equal( + parentNetworkMarkers.length, + 8, + `We should get 4 pairs of network markers in the parent thread.` + // 1 - The main page + // 2 - The SVG + // 3 - The redirected request for the second SVG request. + // 4 - The SVG, again + ); + + /* In this second test, the top level navigation request isn't redirected. + * Contrary to Bug 1692879 we get all network markers for redirected + * resources. */ + Assert.equal( + contentNetworkMarkers.length, + 8, + `We should get 4 pairs of network markers in the content thread.` + ); + + // The same resource firefox-logo-nightly.svg is requested twice, but the + // second time it is redirected. + // We're not interested in the main page, as we test that in other files. + // In this page we're only interested in the marker for requested resources. + + const parentPairs = getPairsOfNetworkMarkers(parentNetworkMarkers); + const contentPairs = getPairsOfNetworkMarkers(contentNetworkMarkers); + + // First, make sure we properly matched all start with stop markers. This + // means that both arrays should contain only arrays of 2 elements. + parentPairs.forEach(pair => + Assert.equal( + pair.length, + 2, + `For the URL ${pair[0].data.URI} we should get 2 markers in the parent process.` + ) + ); + contentPairs.forEach(pair => + Assert.equal( + pair.length, + 2, + `For the URL ${pair[0].data.URI} we should get 2 markers in the content process.` + ) + ); + + const parentFirstStopMarker = parentPairs[1][1]; + const parentRedirectMarker = parentPairs[2][1]; + const parentSecondStopMarker = parentPairs[3][1]; + const contentFirstStopMarker = contentPairs[1][1]; + const contentRedirectMarker = contentPairs[2][1]; + const contentSecondStopMarker = contentPairs[3][1]; + + const expectedCommonDataProperties = { + type: "Network", + requestMethod: "GET", + startTime: Expect.number(), + endTime: Expect.number(), + id: Expect.number(), + pri: Expect.number(), + innerWindowID: Expect.number(), + }; + + // These properties are present when a connection is fully opened. This is + // most often the case, unless we're in verify mode, because in that case + // we run the same tests several times in the same Firefox and they might be + // cached, or in chaos mode Firefox may make all requests sequentially on + // the same connection. + // In these cases, these properties won't always be present. + const expectedConnectionProperties = { + domainLookupStart: Expect.number(), + domainLookupEnd: Expect.number(), + connectStart: Expect.number(), + tcpConnectEnd: Expect.number(), + connectEnd: Expect.number(), + requestStart: Expect.number(), + responseStart: Expect.number(), + responseEnd: Expect.number(), + }; + + const expectedPropertiesForStopMarker = { + name: Expect.stringMatches(/Load \d+:.*\/firefox-logo-nightly\.svg/), + }; + + const expectedDataPropertiesForStopMarker = { + ...expectedCommonDataProperties, + ...expectedConnectionProperties, + status: "STATUS_STOP", + URI: Expect.stringContains("/firefox-logo-nightly.svg"), + contentType: "image/svg+xml", + count: Expect.number(), + }; + + const expectedPropertiesForRedirectMarker = { + name: Expect.stringMatches( + /Load \d+:.*\/redirect.sjs\?firefox-logo-nightly\.svg/ + ), + }; + + const expectedDataPropertiesForRedirectMarker = { + ...expectedCommonDataProperties, + ...expectedConnectionProperties, + status: "STATUS_REDIRECT", + URI: Expect.stringContains("/redirect.sjs?firefox-logo-nightly.svg"), + RedirectURI: Expect.stringContains("/firefox-logo-nightly.svg"), + contentType: null, + redirectType: "Permanent", + isHttpToHttpsRedirect: false, + }; + + Assert.objectContains( + parentFirstStopMarker, + expectedPropertiesForStopMarker + ); + Assert.objectContainsOnly(parentFirstStopMarker.data, { + ...expectedDataPropertiesForStopMarker, + // The cache information is missing from the content marker, it's only part + // of the parent marker. See Bug 1544821. + // Also, because the request races with the cache, these 2 values are valid: + // "Missed" when the cache answered before we get a result from the network. + // "Unresolved" when we got a response from the network before the cache subsystem. + cache: Expect.stringMatches(/^(Missed|Unresolved)$/), + }); + + Assert.objectContains( + contentFirstStopMarker, + expectedPropertiesForStopMarker + ); + Assert.objectContainsOnly( + contentFirstStopMarker.data, + expectedDataPropertiesForStopMarker + ); + + Assert.objectContains( + parentRedirectMarker, + expectedPropertiesForRedirectMarker + ); + Assert.objectContainsOnly(parentRedirectMarker.data, { + ...expectedDataPropertiesForRedirectMarker, + redirectId: parentSecondStopMarker.data.id, + // See above for the full explanation about the cache property. + cache: Expect.stringMatches(/^(Missed|Unresolved)$/), + }); + + Assert.objectContains( + contentRedirectMarker, + expectedPropertiesForRedirectMarker + ); + Assert.objectContainsOnly(contentRedirectMarker.data, { + ...expectedDataPropertiesForRedirectMarker, + redirectId: contentSecondStopMarker.data.id, + }); + + Assert.objectContains( + parentSecondStopMarker, + expectedPropertiesForStopMarker + ); + Assert.objectContainsOnly(parentSecondStopMarker.data, { + ...expectedDataPropertiesForStopMarker, + // The "count" property is absent from the content marker. + count: Expect.number(), + // See above for the full explanation about the cache property. + cache: Expect.stringMatches(/^(Missed|Unresolved)$/), + }); + + Assert.objectContains( + contentSecondStopMarker, + expectedPropertiesForStopMarker + ); + Assert.objectContainsOnly( + contentSecondStopMarker.data, + expectedDataPropertiesForStopMarker + ); + }); +}); |