diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | layout/reftests/css-valuesandunits/unit-vh-vw-overflow-scroll-ref-iframe.html | 36 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/layout/reftests/css-valuesandunits/unit-vh-vw-overflow-scroll-ref-iframe.html b/layout/reftests/css-valuesandunits/unit-vh-vw-overflow-scroll-ref-iframe.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c06fc4476f --- /dev/null +++ b/layout/reftests/css-valuesandunits/unit-vh-vw-overflow-scroll-ref-iframe.html @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +<style> + body { overflow: scroll } + div { + width: 10px; + height: 10px; + background-color: #d64203; + } +</style> + +<body> + <div id="a"></div> + <div id="b"></div> + <div id="c"></div> + <div id="d"></div> + + <!-- + Ensure that the scroller positioned the same way as it would be in the + 'overflow: auto' case. We'll have scrollbars either way, but we don't + want the '!=' reftest to spuriously succeed because of the scrollers. + --> + <div style="width: 500px; height: 500px; background-color: black"> +</body> + +<script> + // client{Width, Height} consist of the area _inside_ the scrollbars, so these + // manually calculated units reflect the fact that with 'overflow: scroll' set, + // viewport units are sized taking the scrollbars into account. + var vw = 0.01 * document.body.clientWidth; + var vh = 0.01 * document.body.clientHeight; + var vmin = Math.min(vw, vh); + var vmax = Math.max(vw, vh); + document.getElementById('a').style.width = (50 * vw) + "px"; + document.getElementById('b').style.height = (25 * vh) + "px"; + document.getElementById('c').style.width = (35 * vmin) + "px"; + document.getElementById('d').style.height = (25 * vmax) + "px"; +</script> |