summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/layout/reftests/image/image-object-position-with-background-1.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--layout/reftests/image/image-object-position-with-background-1.html35
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/layout/reftests/image/image-object-position-with-background-1.html b/layout/reftests/image/image-object-position-with-background-1.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ae7a0a2916
--- /dev/null
+++ b/layout/reftests/image/image-object-position-with-background-1.html
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<!--
+ Any copyright is dedicated to the Public Domain.
+ http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
+-->
+<!--
+ This testcase ensures that we paint the background around an opaque image,
+ when the image is offset from the container via 'object-position'. This is
+ an interesting case because, by default, images fill their container,
+ which means we can often optimize away the background completely. BUT, if
+ "object-position" offsets the image from its container's content-box, we
+ can't optimize away the background; it need to be painted in the uncovered
+ area.
+-->
+<html>
+ <head>
+ <meta charset="utf-8">
+ <style type="text/css">
+ .test {
+ background: salmon;
+ object-position: 5px 5px;
+ width: 32px;
+ height: 32px;
+ display: block;
+ margin-bottom: 2px;
+ }
+ </style>
+ </head>
+ <body>
+ <img class="test" src="blue-32x32.png">
+ <embed class="test" src="blue-32x32.png">
+ <object class="test" data="blue-32x32.png"></object>
+ <video class="test" poster="blue-32x32.png"></video>
+ </body>
+</html>