From 6bf0a5cb5034a7e684dcc3500e841785237ce2dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 19:32:43 +0200
Subject: Adding upstream version 1:115.7.0.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
---
 .../browser_ext_tabs_executeScript_no_create.js    | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 browser/components/extensions/test/browser/browser_ext_tabs_executeScript_no_create.js

(limited to 'browser/components/extensions/test/browser/browser_ext_tabs_executeScript_no_create.js')

diff --git a/browser/components/extensions/test/browser/browser_ext_tabs_executeScript_no_create.js b/browser/components/extensions/test/browser/browser_ext_tabs_executeScript_no_create.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e8e1f1255f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/browser/components/extensions/test/browser/browser_ext_tabs_executeScript_no_create.js
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/* -*- Mode: indent-tabs-mode: nil; js-indent-level: 2 -*- */
+/* vim: set sts=2 sw=2 et tw=80: */
+"use strict";
+
+add_task(async function testExecuteScriptAtOnUpdated() {
+  const BASE =
+    "http://mochi.test:8888/browser/browser/components/extensions/test/browser/";
+  const URL = BASE + "file_iframe_document.html";
+  // This is a regression test for bug 1325830.
+  // The bug (executeScript not completing any more) occurred when executeScript
+  // was called early at the onUpdated event, unless the tabs.create method is
+  // called. So this test does not use tabs.create to open new tabs.
+  // Note that if this test is run together with other tests that do call
+  // tabs.create, then this test case does not properly test the conditions of
+  // the regression any more. To verify that the regression has been resolved,
+  // this test must be run in isolation.
+
+  function background() {
+    // Using variables to prevent listeners from running more than once, instead
+    // of removing the listener. This is to minimize any IPC, since the bug that
+    // is being tested is sensitive to timing.
+    let ignore = false;
+    let url;
+    browser.tabs.onUpdated.addListener((tabId, changeInfo, tab) => {
+      if (ignore) {
+        return;
+      }
+      if (url && changeInfo.status === "loading" && tab.url === url) {
+        ignore = true;
+        browser.tabs
+          .executeScript(tabId, {
+            code: "document.URL",
+          })
+          .then(
+            results => {
+              browser.test.assertEq(
+                url,
+                results[0],
+                "Content script should run"
+              );
+              browser.test.notifyPass("executeScript-at-onUpdated");
+            },
+            error => {
+              browser.test.fail(`Unexpected error: ${error} :: ${error.stack}`);
+              browser.test.notifyFail("executeScript-at-onUpdated");
+            }
+          );
+        // (running this log call after executeScript to minimize IPC between
+        //  onUpdated and executeScript.)
+        browser.test.log(`Found expected navigation to ${url}`);
+      } else {
+        // The bug occurs when executeScript is called before a tab is
+        // initialized.
+        browser.tabs.executeScript(tabId, { code: "" });
+      }
+    });
+    browser.test.onMessage.addListener(testUrl => {
+      url = testUrl;
+      browser.test.sendMessage("open-test-tab");
+    });
+  }
+
+  let extension = ExtensionTestUtils.loadExtension({
+    manifest: {
+      permissions: ["http://mochi.test/", "tabs"],
+    },
+    background,
+  });
+
+  await extension.startup();
+  extension.sendMessage(URL);
+  await extension.awaitMessage("open-test-tab");
+  let tab = await BrowserTestUtils.openNewForegroundTab(gBrowser, URL, true);
+
+  await extension.awaitFinish("executeScript-at-onUpdated");
+
+  await extension.unload();
+
+  BrowserTestUtils.removeTab(tab);
+});
-- 
cgit v1.2.3