From 6bf0a5cb5034a7e684dcc3500e841785237ce2dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 19:32:43 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 1:115.7.0. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- .../gloda/test/unit/test_index_messages_local.js | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 133 insertions(+) create mode 100644 comm/mailnews/db/gloda/test/unit/test_index_messages_local.js (limited to 'comm/mailnews/db/gloda/test/unit/test_index_messages_local.js') diff --git a/comm/mailnews/db/gloda/test/unit/test_index_messages_local.js b/comm/mailnews/db/gloda/test/unit/test_index_messages_local.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5441a3062c --- /dev/null +++ b/comm/mailnews/db/gloda/test/unit/test_index_messages_local.js @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ +/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public + * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this + * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */ + +/* + * Test indexing support for local messages. + */ + +var { + glodaTestHelperInitialize, + assertExpectedMessagesIndexed, + waitForGlodaIndexer, + messageInjection, + nukeGlodaCachesAndCollections, +} = ChromeUtils.import("resource://testing-common/gloda/GlodaTestHelper.jsm"); +var { waitForGlodaDBFlush } = ChromeUtils.import( + "resource://testing-common/gloda/GlodaTestHelperFunctions.jsm" +); +var { MessageGenerator, MessageScenarioFactory } = ChromeUtils.import( + "resource://testing-common/mailnews/MessageGenerator.jsm" +); +var { MessageInjection } = ChromeUtils.import( + "resource://testing-common/mailnews/MessageInjection.jsm" +); + +/* import-globals-from base_index_messages.js */ +load("base_index_messages.js"); + +add_setup(async function () { + msgGen = new MessageGenerator(); + scenarios = new MessageScenarioFactory(msgGen); + messageInjection = new MessageInjection({ mode: "local" }, msgGen); + glodaTestHelperInitialize(messageInjection); +}); + +/** + * Make sure that if we have to reparse a local folder we do not hang or + * anything. (We had a regression where we would hang.) + */ +add_task(async function test_reparse_of_local_folder_works() { + // Index a folder. + let [[folder], msgSet] = await messageInjection.makeFoldersWithSets(1, [ + { count: 1 }, + ]); + await waitForGlodaIndexer(); + Assert.ok(...assertExpectedMessagesIndexed([msgSet])); + + // Force a db flush so we do not have any outstanding references to the + // folder or its headers. + await waitForGlodaDBFlush(); + + // Mark the summary invalid. + folder.msgDatabase.summaryValid = false; + // Clear the database so next time we have to reparse. + folder.msgDatabase.forceClosed(); + + // Force gloda to re-parse the folder again. + GlodaMsgIndexer.indexFolder(folder); + await waitForGlodaIndexer(); + Assert.ok(...assertExpectedMessagesIndexed([])); +}); + +/** + * Ensure that fromJSON for a non-singular attribute properly filters out + * "undefined" return values, specifically as it relates to tags. When the + * user removes them Gloda doesn't actually re-index the messages so the + * values will still be there when we next load the message. + * + * We directly monkey with the state of NounTag for no really good reason, but + * maybe it cuts down on disk I/O because we don't have to touch prefs. + */ +add_task(async function test_fromjson_of_removed_tag() { + // -- Inject + let [, msgSet] = await messageInjection.makeFoldersWithSets(1, [ + { count: 1 }, + ]); + await waitForGlodaIndexer(); + Assert.ok(...assertExpectedMessagesIndexed([msgSet], { augment: true })); + let gmsg = msgSet.glodaMessages[0]; + + // -- Tag + let tag = TagNoun.getTag("$label4"); + msgSet.addTag(tag.key); + await waitForGlodaIndexer(); + Assert.ok(...assertExpectedMessagesIndexed([msgSet])); + Assert.equal(gmsg.tags.length, 1); + Assert.equal(gmsg.tags[0].key, tag.key); + + // -- Forget about the tag, TagNoun! + delete TagNoun._tagMap[tag.key]; + // This also means we have to replace the tag service with a liar. + let realTagService = TagNoun._msgTagService; + TagNoun._msgTagService = { + isValidKey() { + return false; + }, // Lies! + }; + + // -- Forget about the message, gloda! + let glodaId = gmsg.id; + nukeGlodaCachesAndCollections(); + + // -- Re-load the message. + let query = Gloda.newQuery(GlodaConstants.NOUN_MESSAGE); + query.id(glodaId); + let coll = await queryExpect(query, msgSet); + + // -- Put the tag back in TagNoun before we check and possibly explode. + TagNoun._tagMap[tag.key] = tag; + TagNoun._msgTagService = realTagService; + + // -- Verify the message apparently has no tags (despite no reindex). + gmsg = coll.items[0]; + Assert.equal(gmsg.tags.length, 0); +}); + +/** + * Test that we are using hasOwnProperty or a properly guarding dict for + * NounTag so that if someone created a tag called "watch" and then deleted + * it, we don't end up exposing the watch function as the tag. + * + * Strictly speaking, this does not really belong here, but it's a matched set + * with the previous test. + */ +add_task( + function test_nountag_does_not_think_it_has_watch_tag_when_it_does_not() { + Assert.equal(TagNoun.fromJSON("watch"), undefined); + } +); + +base_index_messages_tests.forEach(e => { + add_task(e); +}); -- cgit v1.2.3