Adding debian version 4.19.304-1.debian/4.19.304-1debian

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 24 insertions, 24 deletions

diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/0190-workqueue-Use-normal-rcu.patch b/debian/patches-rt/0190-workqueue-Use-normal-rcu.patch
index 53e612863..c6ecccd8f 100644
--- a/debian/patches-rt/0190-workqueue-Use-normal-rcu.patch
+++ b/debian/patches-rt/0190-workqueue-Use-normal-rcu.patch
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
 Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:26:54 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH 190/353] workqueue: Use normal rcu
-Origin: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git/commit?id=37451e023726bbdd8de45fa86e8c5038be90e3ae
+Subject: [PATCH 190/354] workqueue: Use normal rcu
+Origin: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git/commit?id=f077c23964fda23dcb109b53b423ca1b8f512573
 
 There is no need for sched_rcu. The undocumented reason why sched_rcu
 is used is to avoid a few explicit rcu_read_lock()/unlock() pairs by
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
-index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
+index 017939097451..8bd6fe347a32 100644
 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
 +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
 @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ enum {
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
   * read locked.
   * If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is
   * responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online.
-@@ -695,8 +695,8 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *get_work_pwq(struct work_struct *work)
+@@ -700,8 +700,8 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *get_work_pwq(struct work_struct *work)
   * @work: the work item of interest
   *
   * Pools are created and destroyed under wq_pool_mutex, and allows read
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
   *
   * All fields of the returned pool are accessible as long as the above
   * mentioned locking is in effect.  If the returned pool needs to be used
-@@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ static void put_pwq_unlocked(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
+@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static void put_pwq_unlocked(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
  {
  	if (pwq) {
  		/*
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  		 * following lock operations are safe.
  		 */
  		spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
-@@ -1229,6 +1229,7 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
+@@ -1232,6 +1232,7 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
  	if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work)))
  		return 0;
  
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  	/*
  	 * The queueing is in progress, or it is already queued. Try to
  	 * steal it from ->worklist without clearing WORK_STRUCT_PENDING.
-@@ -1267,10 +1268,12 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
+@@ -1270,10 +1271,12 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
  		set_work_pool_and_keep_pending(work, pool->id);
  
  		spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  	local_irq_restore(*flags);
  	if (work_is_canceling(work))
  		return -ENOENT;
-@@ -1383,6 +1386,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+@@ -1386,6 +1389,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
  	if (unlikely(wq->flags & __WQ_DRAINING) &&
  	    WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_chained_work(wq)))
  		return;
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  retry:
  	/* pwq which will be used unless @work is executing elsewhere */
  	if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) {
-@@ -1441,10 +1445,8 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+@@ -1444,10 +1448,8 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
  	/* pwq determined, queue */
  	trace_workqueue_queue_work(req_cpu, pwq, work);
  
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  
  	pwq->nr_in_flight[pwq->work_color]++;
  	work_flags = work_color_to_flags(pwq->work_color);
-@@ -1463,7 +1465,9 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+@@ -1466,7 +1468,9 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
  	debug_work_activate(work);
  	insert_work(pwq, work, worklist, work_flags);
  
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  }
  
  /**
-@@ -2861,14 +2865,14 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
+@@ -2864,14 +2868,14 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
  
  	might_sleep();
  
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  	/* see the comment in try_to_grab_pending() with the same code */
  	pwq = get_work_pwq(work);
  	if (pwq) {
-@@ -2900,10 +2904,11 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
+@@ -2903,10 +2907,11 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
  		lock_map_acquire(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map);
  		lock_map_release(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map);
  	}
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  	return false;
  }
  
-@@ -3348,7 +3353,7 @@ static void rcu_free_pool(struct rcu_head *rcu)
+@@ -3351,7 +3356,7 @@ static void rcu_free_pool(struct rcu_head *rcu)
   * put_unbound_pool - put a worker_pool
   * @pool: worker_pool to put
   *
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
   * safe manner.  get_unbound_pool() calls this function on its failure path
   * and this function should be able to release pools which went through,
   * successfully or not, init_worker_pool().
-@@ -3402,8 +3407,8 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
+@@ -3405,8 +3410,8 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
  	del_timer_sync(&pool->idle_timer);
  	del_timer_sync(&pool->mayday_timer);
  
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  }
  
  /**
-@@ -3516,14 +3521,14 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
+@@ -3519,14 +3524,14 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
  	put_unbound_pool(pool);
  	mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
  
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  }
  
  /**
-@@ -4230,7 +4235,7 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
+@@ -4233,7 +4238,7 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
  		 * The base ref is never dropped on per-cpu pwqs.  Directly
  		 * schedule RCU free.
  		 */
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  	} else {
  		/*
  		 * We're the sole accessor of @wq at this point.  Directly
-@@ -4340,7 +4345,8 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
+@@ -4343,7 +4348,8 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
  	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
  	bool ret;
  
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  
  	if (cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
  		cpu = smp_processor_id();
-@@ -4351,7 +4357,8 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
+@@ -4354,7 +4360,8 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
  		pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu));
  
  	ret = !list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works);
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  
  	return ret;
  }
-@@ -4377,15 +4384,15 @@ unsigned int work_busy(struct work_struct *work)
+@@ -4380,15 +4387,15 @@ unsigned int work_busy(struct work_struct *work)
  	if (work_pending(work))
  		ret |= WORK_BUSY_PENDING;
  
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  
  	return ret;
  }
-@@ -4570,7 +4577,7 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void)
+@@ -4573,7 +4580,7 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void)
  	unsigned long flags;
  	int pi;
  
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  
  	pr_info("Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:\n");
  
-@@ -4635,7 +4642,7 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void)
+@@ -4638,7 +4645,7 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void)
  		touch_nmi_watchdog();
  	}
  
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  }
  
  /* used to show worker information through /proc/PID/{comm,stat,status} */
-@@ -5022,16 +5029,16 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void)
+@@ -5025,16 +5032,16 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void)
  		 * nr_active is monotonically decreasing.  It's safe
  		 * to peek without lock.
  		 */
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  	}
  out_unlock:
  	mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
-@@ -5233,7 +5240,8 @@ static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev,
+@@ -5240,7 +5247,8 @@ static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev,
  	const char *delim = "";
  	int node, written = 0;
  
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644
  	for_each_node(node) {
  		written += scnprintf(buf + written, PAGE_SIZE - written,
  				     "%s%d:%d", delim, node,
-@@ -5241,7 +5249,8 @@ static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev,
+@@ -5248,7 +5256,8 @@ static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev,
  		delim = " ";
  	}
  	written += scnprintf(buf + written, PAGE_SIZE - written, "\n");