diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-05-08 04:21:44 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-05-08 04:22:00 +0000 |
commit | 9b228b28ccd91b2f915f0575b7d67a8610b72d30 (patch) | |
tree | 3197d6e68ec1f053a5d60a1e0d84fa334ac486f1 /debian/patches-rt/0190-workqueue-Use-normal-rcu.patch | |
parent | Merging upstream version 4.19.304. (diff) | |
download | linux-9b228b28ccd91b2f915f0575b7d67a8610b72d30.tar.xz linux-9b228b28ccd91b2f915f0575b7d67a8610b72d30.zip |
Merging debian version 4.19.304-1.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'debian/patches-rt/0190-workqueue-Use-normal-rcu.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | debian/patches-rt/0190-workqueue-Use-normal-rcu.patch | 48 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/0190-workqueue-Use-normal-rcu.patch b/debian/patches-rt/0190-workqueue-Use-normal-rcu.patch index 53e612863..c6ecccd8f 100644 --- a/debian/patches-rt/0190-workqueue-Use-normal-rcu.patch +++ b/debian/patches-rt/0190-workqueue-Use-normal-rcu.patch @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:26:54 +0200 -Subject: [PATCH 190/353] workqueue: Use normal rcu -Origin: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git/commit?id=37451e023726bbdd8de45fa86e8c5038be90e3ae +Subject: [PATCH 190/354] workqueue: Use normal rcu +Origin: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git/commit?id=f077c23964fda23dcb109b53b423ca1b8f512573 There is no need for sched_rcu. The undocumented reason why sched_rcu is used is to avoid a few explicit rcu_read_lock()/unlock() pairs by @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c -index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 +index 017939097451..8bd6fe347a32 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ enum { @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 * read locked. * If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is * responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online. -@@ -695,8 +695,8 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *get_work_pwq(struct work_struct *work) +@@ -700,8 +700,8 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *get_work_pwq(struct work_struct *work) * @work: the work item of interest * * Pools are created and destroyed under wq_pool_mutex, and allows read @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 * * All fields of the returned pool are accessible as long as the above * mentioned locking is in effect. If the returned pool needs to be used -@@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ static void put_pwq_unlocked(struct pool_workqueue *pwq) +@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static void put_pwq_unlocked(struct pool_workqueue *pwq) { if (pwq) { /* @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 * following lock operations are safe. */ spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock); -@@ -1229,6 +1229,7 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork, +@@ -1232,6 +1232,7 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork, if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))) return 0; @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 /* * The queueing is in progress, or it is already queued. Try to * steal it from ->worklist without clearing WORK_STRUCT_PENDING. -@@ -1267,10 +1268,12 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork, +@@ -1270,10 +1271,12 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork, set_work_pool_and_keep_pending(work, pool->id); spin_unlock(&pool->lock); @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 local_irq_restore(*flags); if (work_is_canceling(work)) return -ENOENT; -@@ -1383,6 +1386,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq, +@@ -1386,6 +1389,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq, if (unlikely(wq->flags & __WQ_DRAINING) && WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_chained_work(wq))) return; @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 retry: /* pwq which will be used unless @work is executing elsewhere */ if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) { -@@ -1441,10 +1445,8 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq, +@@ -1444,10 +1448,8 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq, /* pwq determined, queue */ trace_workqueue_queue_work(req_cpu, pwq, work); @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 pwq->nr_in_flight[pwq->work_color]++; work_flags = work_color_to_flags(pwq->work_color); -@@ -1463,7 +1465,9 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq, +@@ -1466,7 +1468,9 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq, debug_work_activate(work); insert_work(pwq, work, worklist, work_flags); @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 } /** -@@ -2861,14 +2865,14 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr, +@@ -2864,14 +2868,14 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr, might_sleep(); @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 /* see the comment in try_to_grab_pending() with the same code */ pwq = get_work_pwq(work); if (pwq) { -@@ -2900,10 +2904,11 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr, +@@ -2903,10 +2907,11 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr, lock_map_acquire(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map); lock_map_release(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map); } @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 return false; } -@@ -3348,7 +3353,7 @@ static void rcu_free_pool(struct rcu_head *rcu) +@@ -3351,7 +3356,7 @@ static void rcu_free_pool(struct rcu_head *rcu) * put_unbound_pool - put a worker_pool * @pool: worker_pool to put * @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 * safe manner. get_unbound_pool() calls this function on its failure path * and this function should be able to release pools which went through, * successfully or not, init_worker_pool(). -@@ -3402,8 +3407,8 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool) +@@ -3405,8 +3410,8 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool) del_timer_sync(&pool->idle_timer); del_timer_sync(&pool->mayday_timer); @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 } /** -@@ -3516,14 +3521,14 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work) +@@ -3519,14 +3524,14 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work) put_unbound_pool(pool); mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex); @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 } /** -@@ -4230,7 +4235,7 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq) +@@ -4233,7 +4238,7 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq) * The base ref is never dropped on per-cpu pwqs. Directly * schedule RCU free. */ @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 } else { /* * We're the sole accessor of @wq at this point. Directly -@@ -4340,7 +4345,8 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq) +@@ -4343,7 +4348,8 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq) struct pool_workqueue *pwq; bool ret; @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 if (cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND) cpu = smp_processor_id(); -@@ -4351,7 +4357,8 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq) +@@ -4354,7 +4360,8 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq) pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu)); ret = !list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works); @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 return ret; } -@@ -4377,15 +4384,15 @@ unsigned int work_busy(struct work_struct *work) +@@ -4380,15 +4387,15 @@ unsigned int work_busy(struct work_struct *work) if (work_pending(work)) ret |= WORK_BUSY_PENDING; @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 return ret; } -@@ -4570,7 +4577,7 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void) +@@ -4573,7 +4580,7 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void) unsigned long flags; int pi; @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 pr_info("Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:\n"); -@@ -4635,7 +4642,7 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void) +@@ -4638,7 +4645,7 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void) touch_nmi_watchdog(); } @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 } /* used to show worker information through /proc/PID/{comm,stat,status} */ -@@ -5022,16 +5029,16 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void) +@@ -5025,16 +5032,16 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void) * nr_active is monotonically decreasing. It's safe * to peek without lock. */ @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 } out_unlock: mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex); -@@ -5233,7 +5240,8 @@ static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev, +@@ -5240,7 +5247,8 @@ static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev, const char *delim = ""; int node, written = 0; @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ index 4ea2f7fd20ce..d002a0ab68d6 100644 for_each_node(node) { written += scnprintf(buf + written, PAGE_SIZE - written, "%s%d:%d", delim, node, -@@ -5241,7 +5249,8 @@ static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev, +@@ -5248,7 +5256,8 @@ static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev, delim = " "; } written += scnprintf(buf + written, PAGE_SIZE - written, "\n"); |