Merging upstream version 4.19.269.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

3 files changed, 27 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
index 876cfe01d..28b204eac 100644
--- a/security/commoncap.c
+++ b/security/commoncap.c
@@ -397,8 +397,10 @@ int cap_inode_getsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name, void **buffer,
 				 &tmpbuf, size, GFP_NOFS);
 	dput(dentry);
 
-	if (ret < 0 || !tmpbuf)
-		return ret;
+	if (ret < 0 || !tmpbuf) {
+		size = ret;
+		goto out_free;
+	}
 
 	fs_ns = inode->i_sb->s_user_ns;
 	cap = (struct vfs_cap_data *) tmpbuf;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index d12b07eb3..e2916b115 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ static inline int ima_read_xattr(struct dentry *dentry,
 #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES
 
 #define security_filter_rule_init security_audit_rule_init
+#define security_filter_rule_free security_audit_rule_free
 #define security_filter_rule_match security_audit_rule_match
 
 #else
@@ -308,6 +309,10 @@ static inline int security_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
+static inline void security_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
+{
+}
+
 static inline int security_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
 					     void *lsmrule,
 					     struct audit_context *actx)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 2d5a3daa0..b2dadff36 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -241,6 +241,21 @@ static int __init default_appraise_policy_setup(char *str)
 }
 __setup("ima_appraise_tcb", default_appraise_policy_setup);
 
+static void ima_free_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	if (!entry)
+		return;
+
+	kfree(entry->fsname);
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
+		security_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rule);
+		kfree(entry->lsm[i].args_p);
+	}
+	kfree(entry);
+}
+
 /*
  * The LSM policy can be reloaded, leaving the IMA LSM based rules referring
  * to the old, stale LSM policy.  Update the IMA LSM based rules to reflect
@@ -647,6 +662,7 @@ static int ima_lsm_rule_init(struct ima_rule_entry *entry,
 					   &entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule);
 	if (!entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule) {
 		kfree(entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p);
+		entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p = NULL;
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -1019,7 +1035,7 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(char *rule)
 
 	result = ima_parse_rule(p, entry);
 	if (result) {
-		kfree(entry);
+		ima_free_rule(entry);
 		integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_STATUS, NULL,
 				    NULL, op, "invalid-policy", result,
 				    audit_info);
@@ -1040,15 +1056,11 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(char *rule)
 void ima_delete_rules(void)
 {
 	struct ima_rule_entry *entry, *tmp;
-	int i;
 
 	temp_ima_appraise = 0;
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ima_temp_rules, list) {
-		for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++)
-			kfree(entry->lsm[i].args_p);
-
 		list_del(&entry->list);
-		kfree(entry);
+		ima_free_rule(entry);
 	}
 }