Adding upstream version 4.19.249.upstream/4.19.249upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 429 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cbe024284
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,429 @@
+================================
+GPIO Descriptor Driver Interface
+================================
+
+This document serves as a guide for GPIO chip drivers writers. Note that it
+describes the new descriptor-based interface. For a description of the
+deprecated integer-based GPIO interface please refer to gpio-legacy.txt.
+
+Each GPIO controller driver needs to include the following header, which defines
+the structures used to define a GPIO driver:
+
+	#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+
+
+Internal Representation of GPIOs
+================================
+
+Inside a GPIO driver, individual GPIOs are identified by their hardware number,
+which is a unique number between 0 and n, n being the number of GPIOs managed by
+the chip. This number is purely internal: the hardware number of a particular
+GPIO descriptor is never made visible outside of the driver.
+
+On top of this internal number, each GPIO also need to have a global number in
+the integer GPIO namespace so that it can be used with the legacy GPIO
+interface. Each chip must thus have a "base" number (which can be automatically
+assigned), and for each GPIO the global number will be (base + hardware number).
+Although the integer representation is considered deprecated, it still has many
+users and thus needs to be maintained.
+
+So for example one platform could use numbers 32-159 for GPIOs, with a
+controller defining 128 GPIOs at a "base" of 32 ; while another platform uses
+numbers 0..63 with one set of GPIO controllers, 64-79 with another type of GPIO
+controller, and on one particular board 80-95 with an FPGA. The numbers need not
+be contiguous; either of those platforms could also use numbers 2000-2063 to
+identify GPIOs in a bank of I2C GPIO expanders.
+
+
+Controller Drivers: gpio_chip
+=============================
+
+In the gpiolib framework each GPIO controller is packaged as a "struct
+gpio_chip" (see linux/gpio/driver.h for its complete definition) with members
+common to each controller of that type:
+
+ - methods to establish GPIO line direction
+ - methods used to access GPIO line values
+ - method to set electrical configuration for a given GPIO line
+ - method to return the IRQ number associated to a given GPIO line
+ - flag saying whether calls to its methods may sleep
+ - optional line names array to identify lines
+ - optional debugfs dump method (showing extra state like pullup config)
+ - optional base number (will be automatically assigned if omitted)
+ - optional label for diagnostics and GPIO chip mapping using platform data
+
+The code implementing a gpio_chip should support multiple instances of the
+controller, possibly using the driver model. That code will configure each
+gpio_chip and issue ``gpiochip_add[_data]()`` or ``devm_gpiochip_add_data()``.
+Removing a GPIO controller should be rare; use ``[devm_]gpiochip_remove()``
+when it is unavoidable.
+
+Often a gpio_chip is part of an instance-specific structure with states not
+exposed by the GPIO interfaces, such as addressing, power management, and more.
+Chips such as audio codecs will have complex non-GPIO states.
+
+Any debugfs dump method should normally ignore signals which haven't been
+requested as GPIOs. They can use gpiochip_is_requested(), which returns either
+NULL or the label associated with that GPIO when it was requested.
+
+RT_FULL: the GPIO driver should not use spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs
+(like PM runtime) in its gpio_chip implementation (.get/.set and direction
+control callbacks) if it is expected to call GPIO APIs from atomic context
+on -RT (inside hard IRQ handlers and similar contexts). Normally this should
+not be required.
+
+
+GPIO electrical configuration
+-----------------------------
+
+GPIOs can be configured for several electrical modes of operation by using the
+.set_config() callback. Currently this API supports setting debouncing and
+single-ended modes (open drain/open source). These settings are described
+below.
+
+The .set_config() callback uses the same enumerators and configuration
+semantics as the generic pin control drivers. This is not a coincidence: it is
+possible to assign the .set_config() to the function gpiochip_generic_config()
+which will result in pinctrl_gpio_set_config() being called and eventually
+ending up in the pin control back-end "behind" the GPIO controller, usually
+closer to the actual pins. This way the pin controller can manage the below
+listed GPIO configurations.
+
+If a pin controller back-end is used, the GPIO controller or hardware
+description needs to provide "GPIO ranges" mapping the GPIO line offsets to pin
+numbers on the pin controller so they can properly cross-reference each other.
+
+
+GPIOs with debounce support
+---------------------------
+
+Debouncing is a configuration set to a pin indicating that it is connected to
+a mechanical switch or button, or similar that may bounce. Bouncing means the
+line is pulled high/low quickly at very short intervals for mechanical
+reasons. This can result in the value being unstable or irqs fireing repeatedly
+unless the line is debounced.
+
+Debouncing in practice involves setting up a timer when something happens on
+the line, wait a little while and then sample the line again, so see if it
+still has the same value (low or high). This could also be repeated by a clever
+state machine, waiting for a line to become stable. In either case, it sets
+a certain number of milliseconds for debouncing, or just "on/off" if that time
+is not configurable.
+
+
+GPIOs with open drain/source support
+------------------------------------
+
+Open drain (CMOS) or open collector (TTL) means the line is not actively driven
+high: instead you provide the drain/collector as output, so when the transistor
+is not open, it will present a high-impedance (tristate) to the external rail::
+
+
+   CMOS CONFIGURATION      TTL CONFIGURATION
+
+            ||--- out              +--- out
+     in ----||                   |/
+            ||--+         in ----|
+                |                |\
+               GND	           GND
+
+This configuration is normally used as a way to achieve one of two things:
+
+- Level-shifting: to reach a logical level higher than that of the silicon
+  where the output resides.
+
+- inverse wire-OR on an I/O line, for example a GPIO line, making it possible
+  for any driving stage on the line to drive it low even if any other output
+  to the same line is simultaneously driving it high. A special case of this
+  is driving the SCL and SCA lines of an I2C bus, which is by definition a
+  wire-OR bus.
+
+Both usecases require that the line be equipped with a pull-up resistor. This
+resistor will make the line tend to high level unless one of the transistors on
+the rail actively pulls it down.
+
+The level on the line will go as high as the VDD on the pull-up resistor, which
+may be higher than the level supported by the transistor, achieving a
+level-shift to the higher VDD.
+
+Integrated electronics often have an output driver stage in the form of a CMOS
+"totem-pole" with one N-MOS and one P-MOS transistor where one of them drives
+the line high and one of them drives the line low. This is called a push-pull
+output. The "totem-pole" looks like so::
+
+                     VDD
+                      |
+            OD    ||--+
+         +--/ ---o||     P-MOS-FET
+         |        ||--+
+    IN --+            +----- out
+         |        ||--+
+         +--/ ----||     N-MOS-FET
+            OS    ||--+
+                      |
+                     GND
+
+The desired output signal (e.g. coming directly from some GPIO output register)
+arrives at IN. The switches named "OD" and "OS" are normally closed, creating
+a push-pull circuit.
+
+Consider the little "switches" named "OD" and "OS" that enable/disable the
+P-MOS or N-MOS transistor right after the split of the input. As you can see,
+either transistor will go totally numb if this switch is open. The totem-pole
+is then halved and give high impedance instead of actively driving the line
+high or low respectively. That is usually how software-controlled open
+drain/source works.
+
+Some GPIO hardware come in open drain / open source configuration. Some are
+hard-wired lines that will only support open drain or open source no matter
+what: there is only one transistor there. Some are software-configurable:
+by flipping a bit in a register the output can be configured as open drain
+or open source, in practice by flicking open the switches labeled "OD" and "OS"
+in the drawing above.
+
+By disabling the P-MOS transistor, the output can be driven between GND and
+high impedance (open drain), and by disabling the N-MOS transistor, the output
+can be driven between VDD and high impedance (open source). In the first case,
+a pull-up resistor is needed on the outgoing rail to complete the circuit, and
+in the second case, a pull-down resistor is needed on the rail.
+
+Hardware that supports open drain or open source or both, can implement a
+special callback in the gpio_chip: .set_config() that takes a generic
+pinconf packed value telling whether to configure the line as open drain,
+open source or push-pull. This will happen in response to the
+GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN or GPIO_OPEN_SOURCE flag set in the machine file, or coming
+from other hardware descriptions.
+
+If this state can not be configured in hardware, i.e. if the GPIO hardware does
+not support open drain/open source in hardware, the GPIO library will instead
+use a trick: when a line is set as output, if the line is flagged as open
+drain, and the IN output value is low, it will be driven low as usual. But
+if the IN output value is set to high, it will instead *NOT* be driven high,
+instead it will be switched to input, as input mode is high impedance, thus
+achieveing an "open drain emulation" of sorts: electrically the behaviour will
+be identical, with the exception of possible hardware glitches when switching
+the mode of the line.
+
+For open source configuration the same principle is used, just that instead
+of actively driving the line low, it is set to input.
+
+
+GPIO drivers providing IRQs
+---------------------------
+It is custom that GPIO drivers (GPIO chips) are also providing interrupts,
+most often cascaded off a parent interrupt controller, and in some special
+cases the GPIO logic is melded with a SoC's primary interrupt controller.
+
+The IRQ portions of the GPIO block are implemented using an irqchip, using
+the header <linux/irq.h>. So basically such a driver is utilizing two sub-
+systems simultaneously: gpio and irq.
+
+RT_FULL: a realtime compliant GPIO driver should not use spinlock_t or any
+sleepable APIs (like PM runtime) as part of its irq_chip implementation.
+
+* spinlock_t should be replaced with raw_spinlock_t [1].
+* If sleepable APIs have to be used, these can be done from the .irq_bus_lock()
+  and .irq_bus_unlock() callbacks, as these are the only slowpath callbacks
+  on an irqchip. Create the callbacks if needed [2].
+
+GPIO irqchips usually fall in one of two categories:
+
+* CHAINED GPIO irqchips: these are usually the type that is embedded on
+  an SoC. This means that there is a fast IRQ flow handler for the GPIOs that
+  gets called in a chain from the parent IRQ handler, most typically the
+  system interrupt controller. This means that the GPIO irqchip handler will
+  be called immediately from the parent irqchip, while holding the IRQs
+  disabled. The GPIO irqchip will then end up calling something like this
+  sequence in its interrupt handler::
+
+    static irqreturn_t foo_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data)
+        chained_irq_enter(...);
+        generic_handle_irq(...);
+        chained_irq_exit(...);
+
+  Chained GPIO irqchips typically can NOT set the .can_sleep flag on
+  struct gpio_chip, as everything happens directly in the callbacks: no
+  slow bus traffic like I2C can be used.
+
+  RT_FULL: Note, chained IRQ handlers will not be forced threaded on -RT.
+  As result, spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs (like PM runtime) can't be used
+  in chained IRQ handler.
+  If required (and if it can't be converted to the nested threaded GPIO irqchip)
+  a chained IRQ handler can be converted to generic irq handler and this way
+  it will be a threaded IRQ handler on -RT and a hard IRQ handler on non-RT
+  (for example, see [3]).
+  Know W/A: The generic_handle_irq() is expected to be called with IRQ disabled,
+  so the IRQ core will complain if it is called from an IRQ handler which is
+  forced to a thread. The "fake?" raw lock can be used to W/A this problem::
+
+	raw_spinlock_t wa_lock;
+	static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank)
+		unsigned long wa_lock_flags;
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags);
+		generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(bank->chip.irq.domain, bit));
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags);
+
+* GENERIC CHAINED GPIO irqchips: these are the same as "CHAINED GPIO irqchips",
+  but chained IRQ handlers are not used. Instead GPIO IRQs dispatching is
+  performed by generic IRQ handler which is configured using request_irq().
+  The GPIO irqchip will then end up calling something like this sequence in
+  its interrupt handler::
+
+    static irqreturn_t gpio_rcar_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
+        for each detected GPIO IRQ
+            generic_handle_irq(...);
+
+  RT_FULL: Such kind of handlers will be forced threaded on -RT, as result IRQ
+  core will complain that generic_handle_irq() is called with IRQ enabled and
+  the same W/A as for "CHAINED GPIO irqchips" can be applied.
+
+* NESTED THREADED GPIO irqchips: these are off-chip GPIO expanders and any
+  other GPIO irqchip residing on the other side of a sleeping bus. Of course
+  such drivers that need slow bus traffic to read out IRQ status and similar,
+  traffic which may in turn incur other IRQs to happen, cannot be handled
+  in a quick IRQ handler with IRQs disabled. Instead they need to spawn a
+  thread and then mask the parent IRQ line until the interrupt is handled
+  by the driver. The hallmark of this driver is to call something like
+  this in its interrupt handler::
+
+    static irqreturn_t foo_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data)
+        ...
+        handle_nested_irq(irq);
+
+  The hallmark of threaded GPIO irqchips is that they set the .can_sleep
+  flag on struct gpio_chip to true, indicating that this chip may sleep
+  when accessing the GPIOs.
+
+To help out in handling the set-up and management of GPIO irqchips and the
+associated irqdomain and resource allocation callbacks, the gpiolib has
+some helpers that can be enabled by selecting the GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP Kconfig
+symbol:
+
+* gpiochip_irqchip_add(): adds a chained irqchip to a gpiochip. It will pass
+  the struct gpio_chip* for the chip to all IRQ callbacks, so the callbacks
+  need to embed the gpio_chip in its state container and obtain a pointer
+  to the container using container_of().
+  (See Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt)
+
+* gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(): adds a nested irqchip to a gpiochip.
+  Apart from that it works exactly like the chained irqchip.
+
+* gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(): sets up a chained irq handler for a
+  gpio_chip from a parent IRQ and passes the struct gpio_chip* as handler
+  data. (Notice handler data, since the irqchip data is likely used by the
+  parent irqchip!).
+
+* gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(): sets up a nested irq handler for a
+  gpio_chip from a parent IRQ. As the parent IRQ has usually been
+  explicitly requested by the driver, this does very little more than
+  mark all the child IRQs as having the other IRQ as parent.
+
+If there is a need to exclude certain GPIOs from the IRQ domain, you can
+set .irq.need_valid_mask of the gpiochip before gpiochip_add_data() is
+called. This allocates an .irq.valid_mask with as many bits set as there
+are GPIOs in the chip. Drivers can exclude GPIOs by clearing bits from this
+mask. The mask must be filled in before gpiochip_irqchip_add() or
+gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested() is called.
+
+To use the helpers please keep the following in mind:
+
+- Make sure to assign all relevant members of the struct gpio_chip so that
+  the irqchip can initialize. E.g. .dev and .can_sleep shall be set up
+  properly.
+
+- Nominally set all handlers to handle_bad_irq() in the setup call and pass
+  handle_bad_irq() as flow handler parameter in gpiochip_irqchip_add() if it is
+  expected for GPIO driver that irqchip .set_type() callback have to be called
+  before using/enabling GPIO IRQ. Then set the handler to handle_level_irq()
+  and/or handle_edge_irq() in the irqchip .set_type() callback depending on
+  what your controller supports.
+
+It is legal for any IRQ consumer to request an IRQ from any irqchip no matter
+if that is a combined GPIO+IRQ driver. The basic premise is that gpio_chip and
+irq_chip are orthogonal, and offering their services independent of each
+other.
+
+gpiod_to_irq() is just a convenience function to figure out the IRQ for a
+certain GPIO line and should not be relied upon to have been called before
+the IRQ is used.
+
+So always prepare the hardware and make it ready for action in respective
+callbacks from the GPIO and irqchip APIs. Do not rely on gpiod_to_irq() having
+been called first.
+
+This orthogonality leads to ambiguities that we need to solve: if there is
+competition inside the subsystem which side is using the resource (a certain
+GPIO line and register for example) it needs to deny certain operations and
+keep track of usage inside of the gpiolib subsystem. This is why the API
+below exists.
+
+
+Locking IRQ usage
+-----------------
+Input GPIOs can be used as IRQ signals. When this happens, a driver is requested
+to mark the GPIO as being used as an IRQ::
+
+	int gpiochip_lock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
+
+This will prevent the use of non-irq related GPIO APIs until the GPIO IRQ lock
+is released::
+
+	void gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
+
+When implementing an irqchip inside a GPIO driver, these two functions should
+typically be called in the .startup() and .shutdown() callbacks from the
+irqchip.
+
+When using the gpiolib irqchip helpers, these callback are automatically
+assigned.
+
+Real-Time compliance for GPIO IRQ chips
+---------------------------------------
+
+Any provider of irqchips needs to be carefully tailored to support Real Time
+preemption. It is desirable that all irqchips in the GPIO subsystem keep this
+in mind and do the proper testing to assure they are real time-enabled.
+So, pay attention on above " RT_FULL:" notes, please.
+The following is a checklist to follow when preparing a driver for real
+time-compliance:
+
+- ensure spinlock_t is not used as part irq_chip implementation;
+- ensure that sleepable APIs are not used as part irq_chip implementation.
+  If sleepable APIs have to be used, these can be done from the .irq_bus_lock()
+  and .irq_bus_unlock() callbacks;
+- Chained GPIO irqchips: ensure spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs are not used
+  from chained IRQ handler;
+- Generic chained GPIO irqchips: take care about generic_handle_irq() calls and
+  apply corresponding W/A;
+- Chained GPIO irqchips: get rid of chained IRQ handler and use generic irq
+  handler if possible :)
+- regmap_mmio: Sry, but you are in trouble :( if MMIO regmap is used as for
+  GPIO IRQ chip implementation;
+- Test your driver with the appropriate in-kernel real time test cases for both
+  level and edge IRQs.
+
+
+Requesting self-owned GPIO pins
+-------------------------------
+
+Sometimes it is useful to allow a GPIO chip driver to request its own GPIO
+descriptors through the gpiolib API. Using gpio_request() for this purpose
+does not help since it pins the module to the kernel forever (it calls
+try_module_get()). A GPIO driver can use the following functions instead
+to request and free descriptors without being pinned to the kernel forever::
+
+	struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_request_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc,
+						    const char *label)
+
+	void gpiochip_free_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc)
+
+Descriptors requested with gpiochip_request_own_desc() must be released with
+gpiochip_free_own_desc().
+
+These functions must be used with care since they do not affect module use
+count. Do not use the functions to request gpio descriptors not owned by the
+calling driver.
+
+* [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg120425.html
+* [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/25/494
+* [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/25/495