summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/debian/patches-rt/0029-arm-at91-do-not-disable-enable-clocks-in-a-row.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'debian/patches-rt/0029-arm-at91-do-not-disable-enable-clocks-in-a-row.patch')
-rw-r--r--debian/patches-rt/0029-arm-at91-do-not-disable-enable-clocks-in-a-row.patch98
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/0029-arm-at91-do-not-disable-enable-clocks-in-a-row.patch b/debian/patches-rt/0029-arm-at91-do-not-disable-enable-clocks-in-a-row.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8bf2d54e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches-rt/0029-arm-at91-do-not-disable-enable-clocks-in-a-row.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+From 61b697c120be1e50542dfa879ebb522bf834b8d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
+Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 10:51:06 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH 029/347] arm: at91: do not disable/enable clocks in a row
+Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.246-rt110.tar.xz
+
+Currently the driver will disable the clock and enable it one line later
+if it is switching from periodic mode into one shot.
+This can be avoided and causes a needless warning on -RT.
+
+Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
+---
+ drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
+ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c b/drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c
+index 43f4d5c4d6fa..de6baf564dfe 100644
+--- a/drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c
++++ b/drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c
+@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static struct clocksource clksrc = {
+ struct tc_clkevt_device {
+ struct clock_event_device clkevt;
+ struct clk *clk;
++ bool clk_enabled;
+ void __iomem *regs;
+ };
+
+@@ -143,6 +144,24 @@ static struct tc_clkevt_device *to_tc_clkevt(struct clock_event_device *clkevt)
+ */
+ static u32 timer_clock;
+
++static void tc_clk_disable(struct clock_event_device *d)
++{
++ struct tc_clkevt_device *tcd = to_tc_clkevt(d);
++
++ clk_disable(tcd->clk);
++ tcd->clk_enabled = false;
++}
++
++static void tc_clk_enable(struct clock_event_device *d)
++{
++ struct tc_clkevt_device *tcd = to_tc_clkevt(d);
++
++ if (tcd->clk_enabled)
++ return;
++ clk_enable(tcd->clk);
++ tcd->clk_enabled = true;
++}
++
+ static int tc_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *d)
+ {
+ struct tc_clkevt_device *tcd = to_tc_clkevt(d);
+@@ -150,8 +169,14 @@ static int tc_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *d)
+
+ writel(0xff, regs + ATMEL_TC_REG(2, IDR));
+ writel(ATMEL_TC_CLKDIS, regs + ATMEL_TC_REG(2, CCR));
++ return 0;
++}
++
++static int tc_shutdown_clk_off(struct clock_event_device *d)
++{
++ tc_shutdown(d);
+ if (!clockevent_state_detached(d))
+- clk_disable(tcd->clk);
++ tc_clk_disable(d);
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+@@ -164,7 +189,7 @@ static int tc_set_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *d)
+ if (clockevent_state_oneshot(d) || clockevent_state_periodic(d))
+ tc_shutdown(d);
+
+- clk_enable(tcd->clk);
++ tc_clk_enable(d);
+
+ /* slow clock, count up to RC, then irq and stop */
+ writel(timer_clock | ATMEL_TC_CPCSTOP | ATMEL_TC_WAVE |
+@@ -186,7 +211,7 @@ static int tc_set_periodic(struct clock_event_device *d)
+ /* By not making the gentime core emulate periodic mode on top
+ * of oneshot, we get lower overhead and improved accuracy.
+ */
+- clk_enable(tcd->clk);
++ tc_clk_enable(d);
+
+ /* slow clock, count up to RC, then irq and restart */
+ writel(timer_clock | ATMEL_TC_WAVE | ATMEL_TC_WAVESEL_UP_AUTO,
+@@ -220,7 +245,7 @@ static struct tc_clkevt_device clkevt = {
+ /* Should be lower than at91rm9200's system timer */
+ .rating = 125,
+ .set_next_event = tc_next_event,
+- .set_state_shutdown = tc_shutdown,
++ .set_state_shutdown = tc_shutdown_clk_off,
+ .set_state_periodic = tc_set_periodic,
+ .set_state_oneshot = tc_set_oneshot,
+ },
+--
+2.36.1
+