1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
From 4639984350d5520c7268c26b6454c2f47cf139e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:25:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 315/347] userfaultfd: Use a seqlock instead of seqcount
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.246-rt110.tar.xz
[ Upstream commit dc952a564d02997330654be9628bbe97ba2a05d3 ]
On RT write_seqcount_begin() disables preemption which leads to warning
in add_wait_queue() while the spinlock_t is acquired.
The waitqueue can't be converted to swait_queue because
userfaultfd_wake_function() is used as a custom wake function.
Use seqlock instead seqcount to avoid the preempt_disable() section
during add_wait_queue().
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index 23c8efc967af..3f79609511da 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct userfaultfd_ctx {
/* waitqueue head for events */
wait_queue_head_t event_wqh;
/* a refile sequence protected by fault_pending_wqh lock */
- struct seqcount refile_seq;
+ seqlock_t refile_seq;
/* pseudo fd refcounting */
atomic_t refcount;
/* userfaultfd syscall flags */
@@ -1059,7 +1059,7 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, int no_wait,
* waitqueue could become empty if this is the
* only userfault.
*/
- write_seqcount_begin(&ctx->refile_seq);
+ write_seqlock(&ctx->refile_seq);
/*
* The fault_pending_wqh.lock prevents the uwq
@@ -1085,7 +1085,7 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, int no_wait,
list_del(&uwq->wq.entry);
add_wait_queue(&ctx->fault_wqh, &uwq->wq);
- write_seqcount_end(&ctx->refile_seq);
+ write_sequnlock(&ctx->refile_seq);
/* careful to always initialize msg if ret == 0 */
*msg = uwq->msg;
@@ -1258,11 +1258,11 @@ static __always_inline void wake_userfault(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
* sure we've userfaults to wake.
*/
do {
- seq = read_seqcount_begin(&ctx->refile_seq);
+ seq = read_seqbegin(&ctx->refile_seq);
need_wakeup = waitqueue_active(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh) ||
waitqueue_active(&ctx->fault_wqh);
cond_resched();
- } while (read_seqcount_retry(&ctx->refile_seq, seq));
+ } while (read_seqretry(&ctx->refile_seq, seq));
if (need_wakeup)
__wake_userfault(ctx, range);
}
@@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@ static void init_once_userfaultfd_ctx(void *mem)
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->fault_wqh);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->event_wqh);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->fd_wqh);
- seqcount_init(&ctx->refile_seq);
+ seqlock_init(&ctx->refile_seq);
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE1(userfaultfd, int, flags)
--
2.36.1
|
