diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-28 09:51:24 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-28 09:51:24 +0000 |
commit | f7548d6d28c313cf80e6f3ef89aed16a19815df1 (patch) | |
tree | a3f6f2a3f247293bee59ecd28e8cd8ceb6ca064a /doc/wiki/Design.Indexes.TransactionLog.txt | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | dovecot-upstream.tar.xz dovecot-upstream.zip |
Adding upstream version 1:2.3.19.1+dfsg1.upstream/1%2.3.19.1+dfsg1upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/wiki/Design.Indexes.TransactionLog.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/wiki/Design.Indexes.TransactionLog.txt | 265 |
1 files changed, 265 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/wiki/Design.Indexes.TransactionLog.txt b/doc/wiki/Design.Indexes.TransactionLog.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e86751b --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/wiki/Design.Indexes.TransactionLog.txt @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@ +Transaction log +=============== + +The transaction log is a bit similar to transaction logs in databases. All the +updates to the main index files are first written to the transaction log, and +only after that the main index file is updated. There are several advantages to +this: + + * It provides atomic transactions: The transaction either succeeds, or it + doesn't. For example if a transaction sets a flag to one message and removes + it from another, it's guaranteed that both changes happen. + * When updating the changes to the main index file, the last thing that's + done is to update the "transaction log position" in the header. So if + Dovecot crashes after having updated only the first flag, the next time + the mailbox is opened both of the changes are done all over again. + * It allows another process to quickly see what changes have been made. For + example IMAP needs to get a list of external changes after each command. + * This is also important when storing the index files in NFS or in a + clustered filesystem. Instead of re-reading the whole index file after + each external change, Dovecot can simply read the new changes from the + transaction log and apply them to the in-memory copy of the main index. + In-memory caching of 'dovecot.index.cache' file also relies on the + transaction log telling what parts of the file has changed. + * In future the transaction logs can be somewhat easily used to implement + replication. + +Internal vs. external +--------------------- + +Transactions are either internal or external. The difference is that external +transactions describe changes that were already made to the mailbox, while +internal transactions are commands to do something to the mailbox. When +beginning to synchronize a mailbox with index files, the index file is first +updated with all the external changes, and the uncommitted internal +transactions are applied on top of them. + +When synchronizing the mailbox, using the synchronization transaction writes +only external transactions. Also if the index file is updated when saving new +mails to the mailbox, the append transactions must be external. This is because +the changes are already in the mailbox at the time the transaction is read. + +Reading and writing +------------------- + +Reading transaction logs doesn't require any locking at all. Writing is +exclusively locked using the index files' default lock method (as specified by +the 'lock_method' setting). + +A new log is created by first creating a 'dovecot.index.log.newlock' dotlock +file. Once you have the dotlock, check again that the 'dovecot.index.log' +wasn't created (or recreated) by another process. If not, go ahead and write +the log header to the dotlock file and finally 'rename()' it to +'dovecot.index.log'. + +Currently there doesn't exist actual transaction boundaries in the log file. +All the changes in a transaction are simply written as separate records to the +file. Each record begins with a 'struct mail_transaction_header', which +contains the record's size and type. The size is in <lockless integer format> +[Design.Indexes.txt]. + +The first transaction record is written with the size field being 0. Once the +whole transaction has been written, the 0 is updated with the actual size. This +way the transaction log readers won't see partial transactions because they +stop at the size=0 if the transaction isn't fully written yet. + +Note that because there are no transaction boundaries, there's a small race +condition here with mmap()ed log files: + + 1. Process A: write() half of the transaction + 2. Process B: mmap() the file. + 3. Process A: write() the rest of the transaction, updating the size=0 also + 4. Process B: parse the log file. it'll go past the original size=0 because + the size had changed in the mmap, but it stops in the middle of the + transaction because the mmap size doesn't contain the whole transaction + +This probably isn't a big problem, because I've never seen this happen even +with stress tests. Should be fixed at some point anyway. + +Header +------ + +The transaction log's header never changes, except the indexid field may be +overwritten with 0 if the log is found to be corrupted. The fields are: + +major_version: + If this doesn't match 'MAIL_TRANSACTION_LOG_MAJOR_VERSION', don't try to + parse it. If Dovecot sees this, it'll recreate the log file. + +minor_version: + If this doesn't match 'MAIL_TRANSACTION_LOG_MINOR_VERSION', the log file + contains some backwards compatible changes. Currently you can just ignore + this field. + +hdr_size: + Size of the log file's header. Use this instead of 'sizeof(struct + mail_transaction_log_header)', so that it's possible to add new fields and + still be backwards compatible. + +indexid: + This field must match to main index file's indexid field. + +file_seq: + The file's creation sequence. Must be increasing. + +prev_file_seq, prev_file_offset: + Contains the sequence and offset of where the last transaction log ended. + When transaction log is rotated and the reader's "sync position" still points + to the previous log file, these fields allow it to easily check if there had + been any more changes in the previous file. + +create_stamp: + UNIX timestamp when the file was created. Used in determining when to rotate + the log file. + +Record header +------------- + +The transaction record header ('struct mail_transaction_header') contains +'size' and 'type' fields. The 'size' field is in <lockless integer format> +[Design.Indexes.txt]. A single transaction record may contain multiple changes +of the same type, although some types don't allow this. Because the size of the +transaction record for each type is known (or can be determined from the +type-specific record contents), the 'size' field can be used to figure out how +many changes need to be done. So for example a record can contain: + + * 'struct mail_transaction_header { type = MAIL_TRANSACTION_APPEND, size = + sizeof(struct mail_index_record) * 2 }' + * 'struct mail_index_record { uid = 1, flags = 0 } ' + * 'struct mail_index_record { uid = 2, flags = 0 } ' + +UIDs +---- + +Many record types contain 'uint32_t uid1, uid2' fields. This means that the +changes apply to all the messages in uid1..uid2 range. The messages don't +really have to exist in the range, so for example if the first messages in the +mailbox had UIDs 1, 100 and 1000, it would be possible to use uid1=1, uid2=1000 +to describe changes made to these 3 messages. This also means that it's safe to +write transactions describing changes to messages that were just expunged by +another process (and already written to the log file before our changes). + +Appends +------- + +As described above, the appends must be in external transactions. The append +transaction's contents is simply the 'struct mail_index_record', so it contains +only the message's UID and flags. The message contents aren't written to +transaction log. Also if the message had any keywords when it was appended, +they're in a separate transaction record. + +Expunges +-------- + +Because expunges actually destroy messages, they deserve some extra protection +to make it less likely to accidentally expunge wrong messages in case of for +example file corruption. The expunge transactions must have +'MAIL_TRANSACTION_EXPUNGE_PROT' ORed to the transaction type field. If an +expunge type is found without it, assume a corrupted transaction log. + +Flag changes +------------ + +The flag changes are described in: + +---%<------------------------------------------------------------------------- +struct mail_transaction_flag_update { + uint32_t uid1, uid2; + uint8_t add_flags; + uint8_t remove_flags; + uint16_t padding; +}; +---%<------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +The 'padding' is ignored completely. A single flag update structure can add new +flags or remove existing flags. Replacing all the files works by setting +'remove_flags = 0xFF' and the 'add_flags' containing the new flags. + +Keyword changes +--------------- + +Specific keywords can be added or removed one keyword at a time: + +---%<------------------------------------------------------------------------- +struct mail_transaction_keyword_update { + uint8_t modify_type; /* enum modify_type : MODIFY_ADD / MODIFY_REMOVE +*/ + uint8_t padding; + uint16_t name_size; + /* unsigned char name[]; + array of { uint32_t uid1, uid2; } + */ +}; +---%<------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +There is padding after 'name[]' so that uid1 begins from a 32bit aligned +offset. + +If you want to replace all the keywords (eg. IMAP's 'STORE 1:* FLAGS (keyword)' +command), you'll first have to remove all of them with +'MAIL_TRANSACTION_KEYWORD_RESET' and then add the new keywords. + +Extensions +---------- + +Extension records allow creating and updating extension-specific header and +message record data. For example messages' offsets to cache file or mbox file +are stored in extensions. + +Whenever using an extension, you'll need to first write +'MAIL_TRANSACTION_EXT_INTRO' record. This is a bit kludgy and hopefully will be +replaced by something better in future. The intro contains: + +---%<------------------------------------------------------------------------- +struct mail_transaction_ext_intro { + /* old extension: set ext_id. don't set name. + new extension: ext_id = (uint32_t)-1. give name. */ + uint32_t ext_id; + uint32_t reset_id; + uint32_t hdr_size; + uint16_t record_size; + uint16_t record_align; + uint16_t unused_padding; + uint16_t name_size; + /* unsigned char name[]; */ +}; +---%<------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +If the extension already exists in the index file (it can't be removed), you +can use the 'ext_id' field directly. Otherwise you'll need to give a name to +the extension. It's always possible to just give the name if you don't know the +existing extension ID, but this uses more space of course. + +'reset_id' contains kind of a "transaction validity" field. It's updated with +'MAIL_TRANSACTION_EXT_RESET' record, which also causes the extension records' +contents to be zeroed. If an introduction's 'reset_id' doesn't match the last +EXT_RESET, it means that the extension changes are stale and they must be +ignored. For example: + + * 'dovecot.index.cache' file's 'file_seq' header is used as a 'reset_id'. + Initially it's 1. + * Process A: Begins a cache transaction, updating some fields in it. + * Process B: Decides to compress the cache file, and issues a 'reset_id = 2' + change. + * Process A: Commits the transaction with 'reset_id = 1', but the cache file + offsets point to the old file, so the changes must be ignored. + +'hdr_size' specifies the number of bytes the extension wants to have in the +index file's header.'record_size' specifies the number of bytes it wants to use +for each record. The sizes may grow or shrink any time.'record_align' contains +the required alignmentation for the field. For example if the extension +contains a 32bit integer, you want it to be 32bit aligned so that the process +won't crash in CPUs which require proper alignmentation. Then again if you want +to access the field as 4 bytes, the alignmentation can be 1. + +Extension record updates typically are message-specific, so the changes must be +done for each message separately: + +---%<------------------------------------------------------------------------- +struct mail_transaction_ext_rec_update { + uint32_t uid; + /* unsigned char data[]; */ +}; +---%<------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +(This file was created from the wiki on 2019-06-19 12:42) |