diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/filesystems/relay.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/filesystems/relay.rst | 501 |
1 files changed, 501 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/relay.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/relay.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..04ad083cf --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/relay.rst @@ -0,0 +1,501 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +================================== +relay interface (formerly relayfs) +================================== + +The relay interface provides a means for kernel applications to +efficiently log and transfer large quantities of data from the kernel +to userspace via user-defined 'relay channels'. + +A 'relay channel' is a kernel->user data relay mechanism implemented +as a set of per-cpu kernel buffers ('channel buffers'), each +represented as a regular file ('relay file') in user space. Kernel +clients write into the channel buffers using efficient write +functions; these automatically log into the current cpu's channel +buffer. User space applications mmap() or read() from the relay files +and retrieve the data as it becomes available. The relay files +themselves are files created in a host filesystem, e.g. debugfs, and +are associated with the channel buffers using the API described below. + +The format of the data logged into the channel buffers is completely +up to the kernel client; the relay interface does however provide +hooks which allow kernel clients to impose some structure on the +buffer data. The relay interface doesn't implement any form of data +filtering - this also is left to the kernel client. The purpose is to +keep things as simple as possible. + +This document provides an overview of the relay interface API. The +details of the function parameters are documented along with the +functions in the relay interface code - please see that for details. + +Semantics +========= + +Each relay channel has one buffer per CPU, each buffer has one or more +sub-buffers. Messages are written to the first sub-buffer until it is +too full to contain a new message, in which case it is written to +the next (if available). Messages are never split across sub-buffers. +At this point, userspace can be notified so it empties the first +sub-buffer, while the kernel continues writing to the next. + +When notified that a sub-buffer is full, the kernel knows how many +bytes of it are padding i.e. unused space occurring because a complete +message couldn't fit into a sub-buffer. Userspace can use this +knowledge to copy only valid data. + +After copying it, userspace can notify the kernel that a sub-buffer +has been consumed. + +A relay channel can operate in a mode where it will overwrite data not +yet collected by userspace, and not wait for it to be consumed. + +The relay channel itself does not provide for communication of such +data between userspace and kernel, allowing the kernel side to remain +simple and not impose a single interface on userspace. It does +provide a set of examples and a separate helper though, described +below. + +The read() interface both removes padding and internally consumes the +read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being used to drain +the channel buffers, special-purpose communication between kernel and +user isn't necessary for basic operation. + +One of the major goals of the relay interface is to provide a low +overhead mechanism for conveying kernel data to userspace. While the +read() interface is easy to use, it's not as efficient as the mmap() +approach; the example code attempts to make the tradeoff between the +two approaches as small as possible. + +klog and relay-apps example code +================================ + +The relay interface itself is ready to use, but to make things easier, +a couple simple utility functions and a set of examples are provided. + +The relay-apps example tarball, available on the relay sourceforge +site, contains a set of self-contained examples, each consisting of a +pair of .c files containing boilerplate code for each of the user and +kernel sides of a relay application. When combined these two sets of +boilerplate code provide glue to easily stream data to disk, without +having to bother with mundane housekeeping chores. + +The 'klog debugging functions' patch (klog.patch in the relay-apps +tarball) provides a couple of high-level logging functions to the +kernel which allow writing formatted text or raw data to a channel, +regardless of whether a channel to write into exists or not, or even +whether the relay interface is compiled into the kernel or not. These +functions allow you to put unconditional 'trace' statements anywhere +in the kernel or kernel modules; only when there is a 'klog handler' +registered will data actually be logged (see the klog and kleak +examples for details). + +It is of course possible to use the relay interface from scratch, +i.e. without using any of the relay-apps example code or klog, but +you'll have to implement communication between userspace and kernel, +allowing both to convey the state of buffers (full, empty, amount of +padding). The read() interface both removes padding and internally +consumes the read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being +used to drain the channel buffers, special-purpose communication +between kernel and user isn't necessary for basic operation. Things +such as buffer-full conditions would still need to be communicated via +some channel though. + +klog and the relay-apps examples can be found in the relay-apps +tarball on http://relayfs.sourceforge.net + +The relay interface user space API +================================== + +The relay interface implements basic file operations for user space +access to relay channel buffer data. Here are the file operations +that are available and some comments regarding their behavior: + +=========== ============================================================ +open() enables user to open an _existing_ channel buffer. + +mmap() results in channel buffer being mapped into the caller's + memory space. Note that you can't do a partial mmap - you + must map the entire file, which is NRBUF * SUBBUFSIZE. + +read() read the contents of a channel buffer. The bytes read are + 'consumed' by the reader, i.e. they won't be available + again to subsequent reads. If the channel is being used + in no-overwrite mode (the default), it can be read at any + time even if there's an active kernel writer. If the + channel is being used in overwrite mode and there are + active channel writers, results may be unpredictable - + users should make sure that all logging to the channel has + ended before using read() with overwrite mode. Sub-buffer + padding is automatically removed and will not be seen by + the reader. + +sendfile() transfer data from a channel buffer to an output file + descriptor. Sub-buffer padding is automatically removed + and will not be seen by the reader. + +poll() POLLIN/POLLRDNORM/POLLERR supported. User applications are + notified when sub-buffer boundaries are crossed. + +close() decrements the channel buffer's refcount. When the refcount + reaches 0, i.e. when no process or kernel client has the + buffer open, the channel buffer is freed. +=========== ============================================================ + +In order for a user application to make use of relay files, the +host filesystem must be mounted. For example:: + + mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug + +.. Note:: + + the host filesystem doesn't need to be mounted for kernel + clients to create or use channels - it only needs to be + mounted when user space applications need access to the buffer + data. + + +The relay interface kernel API +============================== + +Here's a summary of the API the relay interface provides to in-kernel clients: + +TBD(curr. line MT:/API/) + channel management functions:: + + relay_open(base_filename, parent, subbuf_size, n_subbufs, + callbacks, private_data) + relay_close(chan) + relay_flush(chan) + relay_reset(chan) + + channel management typically called on instigation of userspace:: + + relay_subbufs_consumed(chan, cpu, subbufs_consumed) + + write functions:: + + relay_write(chan, data, length) + __relay_write(chan, data, length) + relay_reserve(chan, length) + + callbacks:: + + subbuf_start(buf, subbuf, prev_subbuf, prev_padding) + buf_mapped(buf, filp) + buf_unmapped(buf, filp) + create_buf_file(filename, parent, mode, buf, is_global) + remove_buf_file(dentry) + + helper functions:: + + relay_buf_full(buf) + subbuf_start_reserve(buf, length) + + +Creating a channel +------------------ + +relay_open() is used to create a channel, along with its per-cpu +channel buffers. Each channel buffer will have an associated file +created for it in the host filesystem, which can be and mmapped or +read from in user space. The files are named basename0...basenameN-1 +where N is the number of online cpus, and by default will be created +in the root of the filesystem (if the parent param is NULL). If you +want a directory structure to contain your relay files, you should +create it using the host filesystem's directory creation function, +e.g. debugfs_create_dir(), and pass the parent directory to +relay_open(). Users are responsible for cleaning up any directory +structure they create, when the channel is closed - again the host +filesystem's directory removal functions should be used for that, +e.g. debugfs_remove(). + +In order for a channel to be created and the host filesystem's files +associated with its channel buffers, the user must provide definitions +for two callback functions, create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file(). +create_buf_file() is called once for each per-cpu buffer from +relay_open() and allows the user to create the file which will be used +to represent the corresponding channel buffer. The callback should +return the dentry of the file created to represent the channel buffer. +remove_buf_file() must also be defined; it's responsible for deleting +the file(s) created in create_buf_file() and is called during +relay_close(). + +Here are some typical definitions for these callbacks, in this case +using debugfs:: + + /* + * create_buf_file() callback. Creates relay file in debugfs. + */ + static struct dentry *create_buf_file_handler(const char *filename, + struct dentry *parent, + umode_t mode, + struct rchan_buf *buf, + int *is_global) + { + return debugfs_create_file(filename, mode, parent, buf, + &relay_file_operations); + } + + /* + * remove_buf_file() callback. Removes relay file from debugfs. + */ + static int remove_buf_file_handler(struct dentry *dentry) + { + debugfs_remove(dentry); + + return 0; + } + + /* + * relay interface callbacks + */ + static struct rchan_callbacks relay_callbacks = + { + .create_buf_file = create_buf_file_handler, + .remove_buf_file = remove_buf_file_handler, + }; + +And an example relay_open() invocation using them:: + + chan = relay_open("cpu", NULL, SUBBUF_SIZE, N_SUBBUFS, &relay_callbacks, NULL); + +If the create_buf_file() callback fails, or isn't defined, channel +creation and thus relay_open() will fail. + +The total size of each per-cpu buffer is calculated by multiplying the +number of sub-buffers by the sub-buffer size passed into relay_open(). +The idea behind sub-buffers is that they're basically an extension of +double-buffering to N buffers, and they also allow applications to +easily implement random-access-on-buffer-boundary schemes, which can +be important for some high-volume applications. The number and size +of sub-buffers is completely dependent on the application and even for +the same application, different conditions will warrant different +values for these parameters at different times. Typically, the right +values to use are best decided after some experimentation; in general, +though, it's safe to assume that having only 1 sub-buffer is a bad +idea - you're guaranteed to either overwrite data or lose events +depending on the channel mode being used. + +The create_buf_file() implementation can also be defined in such a way +as to allow the creation of a single 'global' buffer instead of the +default per-cpu set. This can be useful for applications interested +mainly in seeing the relative ordering of system-wide events without +the need to bother with saving explicit timestamps for the purpose of +merging/sorting per-cpu files in a postprocessing step. + +To have relay_open() create a global buffer, the create_buf_file() +implementation should set the value of the is_global outparam to a +non-zero value in addition to creating the file that will be used to +represent the single buffer. In the case of a global buffer, +create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file() will be called only once. The +normal channel-writing functions, e.g. relay_write(), can still be +used - writes from any cpu will transparently end up in the global +buffer - but since it is a global buffer, callers should make sure +they use the proper locking for such a buffer, either by wrapping +writes in a spinlock, or by copying a write function from relay.h and +creating a local version that internally does the proper locking. + +The private_data passed into relay_open() allows clients to associate +user-defined data with a channel, and is immediately available +(including in create_buf_file()) via chan->private_data or +buf->chan->private_data. + +Buffer-only channels +-------------------- + +These channels have no files associated and can be created with +relay_open(NULL, NULL, ...). Such channels are useful in scenarios such +as when doing early tracing in the kernel, before the VFS is up. In these +cases, one may open a buffer-only channel and then call +relay_late_setup_files() when the kernel is ready to handle files, +to expose the buffered data to the userspace. + +Channel 'modes' +--------------- + +relay channels can be used in either of two modes - 'overwrite' or +'no-overwrite'. The mode is entirely determined by the implementation +of the subbuf_start() callback, as described below. The default if no +subbuf_start() callback is defined is 'no-overwrite' mode. If the +default mode suits your needs, and you plan to use the read() +interface to retrieve channel data, you can ignore the details of this +section, as it pertains mainly to mmap() implementations. + +In 'overwrite' mode, also known as 'flight recorder' mode, writes +continuously cycle around the buffer and will never fail, but will +unconditionally overwrite old data regardless of whether it's actually +been consumed. In no-overwrite mode, writes will fail, i.e. data will +be lost, if the number of unconsumed sub-buffers equals the total +number of sub-buffers in the channel. It should be clear that if +there is no consumer or if the consumer can't consume sub-buffers fast +enough, data will be lost in either case; the only difference is +whether data is lost from the beginning or the end of a buffer. + +As explained above, a relay channel is made of up one or more +per-cpu channel buffers, each implemented as a circular buffer +subdivided into one or more sub-buffers. Messages are written into +the current sub-buffer of the channel's current per-cpu buffer via the +write functions described below. Whenever a message can't fit into +the current sub-buffer, because there's no room left for it, the +client is notified via the subbuf_start() callback that a switch to a +new sub-buffer is about to occur. The client uses this callback to 1) +initialize the next sub-buffer if appropriate 2) finalize the previous +sub-buffer if appropriate and 3) return a boolean value indicating +whether or not to actually move on to the next sub-buffer. + +To implement 'no-overwrite' mode, the userspace client would provide +an implementation of the subbuf_start() callback something like the +following:: + + static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, + void *subbuf, + void *prev_subbuf, + unsigned int prev_padding) + { + if (prev_subbuf) + *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding; + + if (relay_buf_full(buf)) + return 0; + + subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int)); + + return 1; + } + +If the current buffer is full, i.e. all sub-buffers remain unconsumed, +the callback returns 0 to indicate that the buffer switch should not +occur yet, i.e. until the consumer has had a chance to read the +current set of ready sub-buffers. For the relay_buf_full() function +to make sense, the consumer is responsible for notifying the relay +interface when sub-buffers have been consumed via +relay_subbufs_consumed(). Any subsequent attempts to write into the +buffer will again invoke the subbuf_start() callback with the same +parameters; only when the consumer has consumed one or more of the +ready sub-buffers will relay_buf_full() return 0, in which case the +buffer switch can continue. + +The implementation of the subbuf_start() callback for 'overwrite' mode +would be very similar:: + + static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, + void *subbuf, + void *prev_subbuf, + size_t prev_padding) + { + if (prev_subbuf) + *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding; + + subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int)); + + return 1; + } + +In this case, the relay_buf_full() check is meaningless and the +callback always returns 1, causing the buffer switch to occur +unconditionally. It's also meaningless for the client to use the +relay_subbufs_consumed() function in this mode, as it's never +consulted. + +The default subbuf_start() implementation, used if the client doesn't +define any callbacks, or doesn't define the subbuf_start() callback, +implements the simplest possible 'no-overwrite' mode, i.e. it does +nothing but return 0. + +Header information can be reserved at the beginning of each sub-buffer +by calling the subbuf_start_reserve() helper function from within the +subbuf_start() callback. This reserved area can be used to store +whatever information the client wants. In the example above, room is +reserved in each sub-buffer to store the padding count for that +sub-buffer. This is filled in for the previous sub-buffer in the +subbuf_start() implementation; the padding value for the previous +sub-buffer is passed into the subbuf_start() callback along with a +pointer to the previous sub-buffer, since the padding value isn't +known until a sub-buffer is filled. The subbuf_start() callback is +also called for the first sub-buffer when the channel is opened, to +give the client a chance to reserve space in it. In this case the +previous sub-buffer pointer passed into the callback will be NULL, so +the client should check the value of the prev_subbuf pointer before +writing into the previous sub-buffer. + +Writing to a channel +-------------------- + +Kernel clients write data into the current cpu's channel buffer using +relay_write() or __relay_write(). relay_write() is the main logging +function - it uses local_irqsave() to protect the buffer and should be +used if you might be logging from interrupt context. If you know +you'll never be logging from interrupt context, you can use +__relay_write(), which only disables preemption. These functions +don't return a value, so you can't determine whether or not they +failed - the assumption is that you wouldn't want to check a return +value in the fast logging path anyway, and that they'll always succeed +unless the buffer is full and no-overwrite mode is being used, in +which case you can detect a failed write in the subbuf_start() +callback by calling the relay_buf_full() helper function. + +relay_reserve() is used to reserve a slot in a channel buffer which +can be written to later. This would typically be used in applications +that need to write directly into a channel buffer without having to +stage data in a temporary buffer beforehand. Because the actual write +may not happen immediately after the slot is reserved, applications +using relay_reserve() can keep a count of the number of bytes actually +written, either in space reserved in the sub-buffers themselves or as +a separate array. See the 'reserve' example in the relay-apps tarball +at http://relayfs.sourceforge.net for an example of how this can be +done. Because the write is under control of the client and is +separated from the reserve, relay_reserve() doesn't protect the buffer +at all - it's up to the client to provide the appropriate +synchronization when using relay_reserve(). + +Closing a channel +----------------- + +The client calls relay_close() when it's finished using the channel. +The channel and its associated buffers are destroyed when there are no +longer any references to any of the channel buffers. relay_flush() +forces a sub-buffer switch on all the channel buffers, and can be used +to finalize and process the last sub-buffers before the channel is +closed. + +Misc +---- + +Some applications may want to keep a channel around and re-use it +rather than open and close a new channel for each use. relay_reset() +can be used for this purpose - it resets a channel to its initial +state without reallocating channel buffer memory or destroying +existing mappings. It should however only be called when it's safe to +do so, i.e. when the channel isn't currently being written to. + +Finally, there are a couple of utility callbacks that can be used for +different purposes. buf_mapped() is called whenever a channel buffer +is mmapped from user space and buf_unmapped() is called when it's +unmapped. The client can use this notification to trigger actions +within the kernel application, such as enabling/disabling logging to +the channel. + + +Resources +========= + +For news, example code, mailing list, etc. see the relay interface homepage: + + http://relayfs.sourceforge.net + + +Credits +======= + +The ideas and specs for the relay interface came about as a result of +discussions on tracing involving the following: + +Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca> +Richard Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com> +Bob Wisniewski <bob@watson.ibm.com> +Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com> +Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com> + +Also thanks to Hubertus Franke for a lot of useful suggestions and bug +reports. |