diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-05-04 18:00:34 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-05-04 18:00:34 +0000 |
commit | 3f619478f796eddbba6e39502fe941b285dd97b1 (patch) | |
tree | e2c7b5777f728320e5b5542b6213fd3591ba51e2 /mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | mariadb-upstream.tar.xz mariadb-upstream.zip |
Adding upstream version 1:10.11.6.upstream/1%10.11.6upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test')
-rw-r--r-- | mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test | 960 |
1 files changed, 960 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test b/mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2a830c70 --- /dev/null +++ b/mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test @@ -0,0 +1,960 @@ +--source include/have_innodb.inc + +# +# A simple test of the greedy query optimization algorithm and the switches that +# control the optimizationprocess. +# + +# +# Schema +# +--disable_warnings +drop table if exists t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7; +--enable_warnings + +set @save_join_cache_level=@@join_cache_level; +set join_cache_level=1; + +create table t1 ( + c11 integer,c12 integer,c13 integer,c14 integer,c15 integer,c16 integer, + primary key (c11) +); +create table t2 ( + c21 integer,c22 integer,c23 integer,c24 integer,c25 integer,c26 integer +); +create table t3 ( + c31 integer,c32 integer,c33 integer,c34 integer,c35 integer,c36 integer, + primary key (c31) +); +create table t4 ( + c41 integer,c42 integer,c43 integer,c44 integer,c45 integer,c46 integer +); +create table t5 ( + c51 integer,c52 integer,c53 integer,c54 integer,c55 integer,c56 integer, + primary key (c51) +); +create table t6 ( + c61 integer,c62 integer,c63 integer,c64 integer,c65 integer,c66 integer +); +create table t7 ( + c71 integer,c72 integer,c73 integer,c74 integer,c75 integer,c76 integer, + primary key (c71) +); + +# +# Data +# cardinality(Ti) = cardinality(T(i-1)) + 3 +# +insert into t1 values (1,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t1 values (2,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t1 values (3,2,3,4,5,6); + +insert into t2 values (1,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t2 values (2,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t2 values (3,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t2 values (4,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t2 values (5,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t2 values (6,2,3,4,5,6); + +insert into t3 values (1,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t3 values (2,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t3 values (3,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t3 values (4,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t3 values (5,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t3 values (6,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t3 values (7,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t3 values (8,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t3 values (9,2,3,4,5,6); + +insert into t4 values (1,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t4 values (2,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t4 values (3,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t4 values (4,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t4 values (5,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t4 values (6,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t4 values (7,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t4 values (8,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t4 values (9,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t4 values (10,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t4 values (11,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t4 values (12,2,3,4,5,6); + +insert into t5 values (1,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (2,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (3,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (4,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (5,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (6,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (7,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (8,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (9,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (10,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (11,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (12,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (13,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (14,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t5 values (15,2,3,4,5,6); + +insert into t6 values (1,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (2,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (3,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (4,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (5,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (6,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (7,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (8,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (9,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (10,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (11,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (12,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (13,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (14,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (15,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (16,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (17,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t6 values (18,2,3,4,5,6); + +insert into t7 values (1,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (2,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (3,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (4,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (5,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (6,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (7,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (8,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (9,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (10,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (11,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (12,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (13,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (14,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (15,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (16,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (17,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (18,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (19,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (20,2,3,4,5,6); +insert into t7 values (21,2,3,4,5,6); + +# +# The actual test begins here +# + +# This value swithes back to the old implementation of 'find_best()' +# set optimizer_search_depth=63; - old (independent of the optimizer_prune_level) +# +# These are the values for the parameters that control the greedy optimizer +# (total 6 combinations - 3 for optimizer_search_depth, 2 for optimizer_prune_level): +# 3: +# set optimizer_search_depth=0; - automatic +# set optimizer_search_depth=1; - min +# set optimizer_search_depth=62; - max (default) +# 2: +# set optimizer_prune_level=0 - exhaustive; +# set optimizer_prune_level=1 - heuristic; # default + + +# +# Compile several queries with all combinations of the query +# optimizer parameters. Each test query has two variants, where +# in the second variant the tables in the FROM clause are in +# inverse order to the tables in the first variant. +# Due to pre-sorting of tables before compilation, there should +# be no difference in the plans for each two such query variants. +# + +# First, for reference compile the test queries with the 'old' optimization +# procedure 'find_best'. Notice that 'find_best' does not depend on the +# choice of heuristic. + +set optimizer_search_depth=63, optimizer_prune_level=1; +select @@optimizer_search_depth; + +# 6-table join, chain +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, star +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, clique +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; + + +# Test the new optimization procedures + +set optimizer_prune_level=0; +select @@optimizer_prune_level; + +set optimizer_search_depth=0; +select @@optimizer_search_depth; + +# 6-table join, chain +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, star +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, clique +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; + +set optimizer_search_depth=1; +select @@optimizer_search_depth; + +# 6-table join, chain +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, star +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, clique +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; + +set optimizer_search_depth=62; +select @@optimizer_search_depth; + +# 6-table join, chain +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, star +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, clique +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; + + +set optimizer_prune_level=2; +select @@optimizer_prune_level; + +set optimizer_search_depth=0; +select @@optimizer_search_depth; + +# 6-table join, chain +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, star +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, clique +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; + +set optimizer_search_depth=1; +select @@optimizer_search_depth; + +# 6-table join, chain +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, star +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, clique +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; + +set optimizer_search_depth=62; +select @@optimizer_search_depth; + +# 6-table join, chain +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, star +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +# 6-table join, clique +explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; +explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76; +show status like 'Last_query_cost'; + +drop table t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7; + + +# +# Bug # 38795: Automatic search depth and nested join's results in server +# crash +# + +CREATE TABLE t1 (a int, b int, d int, i int); INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,1,1,1); +CREATE TABLE t2 (b int, c int, j int); INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (1,1,1); +CREATE TABLE t2_1 (j int); INSERT INTO t2_1 VALUES (1); +CREATE TABLE t3 (c int, f int); INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (1,1); +CREATE TABLE t3_1 (f int); INSERT INTO t3_1 VALUES (1); +CREATE TABLE t4 (d int, e int, k int); INSERT INTO t4 VALUES (1,1,1); +CREATE TABLE t4_1 (k int); INSERT INTO t4_1 VALUES (1); +CREATE TABLE t5 (g int, d int, h int, l int); INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (1,1,1,1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (l int); INSERT INTO t5_1 VALUES (1); + +SET optimizer_search_depth = 3; + +SELECT 1 +FROM t1 +LEFT JOIN ( + t2 JOIN t3 ON t3.c = t2.c +) ON t2.b = t1.b +LEFT JOIN ( + t4 JOIN t5 ON t5.d = t4.d +) ON t4.d = t1.d +; + +SELECT 1 +FROM t1 +LEFT JOIN ( + t2 LEFT JOIN (t3 JOIN t3_1 ON t3.f = t3_1.f) ON t3.c = t2.c +) ON t2.b = t1.b +LEFT JOIN ( + t4 JOIN t5 ON t5.d = t4.d +) ON t4.d = t1.d +; + +SELECT 1 +FROM t1 +LEFT JOIN ( + (t2 JOIN t2_1 ON t2.j = t2_1.j) JOIN t3 ON t3.c = t2.c +) ON t2.b = t1.b +LEFT JOIN ( + t4 JOIN t5 ON t5.d = t4.d +) ON t4.d = t1.d +; + +SELECT 1 +FROM t1 +LEFT JOIN ( + t2 JOIN t3 ON t3.c = t2.c +) ON t2.b = t1.b +LEFT JOIN ( + (t4 JOIN t4_1 ON t4.k = t4_1.k) LEFT JOIN t5 ON t5.d = t4.d +) ON t4.d = t1.d +; + +SELECT 1 +FROM t1 +LEFT JOIN ( + t2 JOIN t3 ON t3.c = t2.c +) ON t2.b = t1.b +LEFT JOIN ( + t4 LEFT JOIN (t5 JOIN t5_1 ON t5.l = t5_1.l) ON t5.d = t4.d +) ON t4.d = t1.d +; + +SET optimizer_search_depth = DEFAULT; +DROP TABLE t1,t2,t2_1,t3,t3_1,t4,t4_1,t5,t5_1; + +set join_cache_level=@save_join_cache_level; + +--echo End of 5.0 tests + +--echo # +--echo # Bug #59326: Greedy optimizer produce stupid query execution plans. +--echo # + +#double warning for view protocol +--disable_view_protocol + +CREATE TABLE t10( + K INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, + I INT, + PRIMARY KEY(K) +); +INSERT INTO t10(I) VALUES (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(0); + +CREATE TABLE t100 LIKE t10; +INSERT INTO t100(I) +SELECT X.I FROM t10 AS X,t10 AS Y; + +CREATE TABLE t10000 LIKE t10; +INSERT INTO t10000(I) +SELECT X.I FROM t100 AS X, t100 AS Y; + +--disable_warnings +let $total_handler_reads= +select sum(variable_value) from information_schema.session_status + where VARIABLE_NAME like 'Handler_read%'; +--enable_warnings + + +## All crossproducts should be executed in order t10,t100,t10000 +EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t10,t100,t10000; +EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t10,t10000,t100; +EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t100,t10,t10000; +EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t100,t10000,t10; +EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t10000,t10,t100; +EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t10000,t100,t10; + +###### +## Ordering between T100,T10000 EQ-joined T10 will +## normally be with smallest EQ-table joined first +###### +let $query= +SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.I; +--source include/expect_qep.inc + +## However, swapping EQ_REF-joined tables gives the same cost +let $query= +SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.I; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +##### +# Expect all variants of EQ joining t100 & t10000 with T10 +# to have same cost # handler_reads: +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.I; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.I; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.K; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.K; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t100,t10,t10000 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.K; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t100,t10000,t10 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.K; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10000,t10,t100 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.K; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10000,t100,t10 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.K; +--source include/check_qep.inc + + +##### +## EQ_REF Should be executed before table scan(ALL) +## - Independent of #records in table being EQ_REF-joined +##### +##### +# Expect: Join EQ_REF(t100) before ALL(t10000) +let $query= +SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.I=t10.I; +--source include/expect_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.I=t10.I; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.I=t10.I; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +##### +# Expect: Join EQ_REF(t10000) before ALL(t100) (star-join) +let $query= +SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100 +WHERE t100.I=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.I; +--source include/expect_qep.inc + +--echo # See BUG#18352936 +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000 +WHERE t100.I=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.I; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +--echo # See BUG#18352936 +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100 +WHERE t100.I=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t10.I; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +##### +# Expect: Join EQ_REF(t10000) before ALL(t100) +let $query= +SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100 +WHERE t100.I=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t100.I; +--source include/expect_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000 +WHERE t100.I=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t100.I; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100 +WHERE t100.I=t10.I + AND t10000.K=t100.I; +--source include/check_qep.inc + + +##### +## EQ_REF & ALL join two instances of t10000 with t10: +## Always EQ_REF join first before producing cross product +##### + +##### +# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(X) on X.K=t10.I' before 'cross' ALL(Y) +let $query= +SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y +WHERE x.k=t10.i; +--source include/expect_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y +WHERE x.k=t10.i; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 y,t10000 x +WHERE x.k=t10.i; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +##### +# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(X) on X.K=t10.I' before ALL(Y) +let $query= +SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y +WHERE x.k=t10.i + AND y.i=t10.i; +--source include/expect_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y +WHERE x.k=t10.i + AND y.i=t10.i; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 y,t10000 x +WHERE x.k=t10.i + AND y.i=t10.i; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +##### +# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(X) on X.K=t10.I' before ALL(Y) +let $query= +SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y +WHERE x.k=t10.i + AND y.i=x.k; +--source include/expect_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y +WHERE x.k=t10.i + AND y.i=x.k; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 y,t10000 x +WHERE x.k=t10.i + AND y.i=x.k; +--source include/check_qep.inc + + + +## Create indexes to test REF access +CREATE INDEX IX ON t10(I); +CREATE INDEX IX ON t100(I); +CREATE INDEX IX ON t10000(I); + +######## +## EQ_REF Should be executed before 'REF' +## - Independent of #records in table being EQ_REF-joined + +#### +# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(t100) on t100.K=t10.I' before REF(t10000) +let $query= +SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.I=t10.I; +--source include/expect_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.I=t10.I; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100 +WHERE t100.K=t10.I + AND t10000.I=t10.I; +--source include/check_qep.inc + + +##### +## EQ_REF & REF join two instances of t10000 with t10: +##### + +##### +## Expect this QEP, cost & #handler_read +# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(X) on X.K=t10.I' before 'cross' ALL(Y) +let $query= +SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y +WHERE x.k=t10.i; +--source include/expect_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y +WHERE x.k=t10.i; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 y,t10000 x +WHERE x.k=t10.i; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +##### +# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(X) on X.K=t10.I' before REF(Y) +let $query= +SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y +WHERE x.k=t10.i + AND y.i=t10.i; +--source include/expect_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y +WHERE x.k=t10.i + AND y.i=t10.i; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 y,t10000 x +WHERE x.k=t10.i + AND y.i=t10.i; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +##### +# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(X) on X.K=t10.I' before REF(Y) +let $query= +SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y +WHERE x.k=t10.i + AND y.i=x.k; +--source include/expect_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y +WHERE x.k=t10.i + AND y.i=x.k; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +let $query= +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 y,t10000 x +WHERE x.k=t10.i + AND y.i=x.k; +--source include/check_qep.inc + +######## + + + +######## + +--echo # +--echo # Test improved capabilities of analyzing complex query +--echo # plans without restricting 'optimizer_search_depth'. +--echo # Fix problems like those reported as bug#41740 & bug#58225. +--echo # +--echo # EPLAIN of queries using T1-T62 will timeout/hang wo/ fixes +--echo # + +DROP TABLE t10, t10000; + +--disable_result_log + +let $tabledef= +( K INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, + I INT, + A INT, + PRIMARY KEY(K), KEY IX(A) +) engine = InnoDB; + +let $analyze = ANALYZE TABLE t100; + +let $i= 1; +while ($i < 62) +{ + let $create= CREATE TABLE t$i $tabledef; + eval $create; + + let $insert = + INSERT INTO t$i(I,A) SELECT X.K,X.K FROM t100 AS X, t100 AS Y WHERE X.K < 20 AND Y.K <= $i; + eval $insert; + + let $analyze = $analyze, t$i; + inc $i; +} +eval $analyze; + +set optimizer_prune_level=default; +#--enable_result_log +#select @@optimizer_prune_level; +#--disable_result_log +flush status; + +################# +## The EXPLAIN'ed query itself can't be part of the verified +## result as the QEP is not 100% predictable due to variation +## in statistics from the engines. This is believed to be +## caused by: +## - Variations in table fill degree. +## - 'Fuzzy' statistics provided by engines. +## - Round errors caused by 'cost' calculation using +## 'only' 64-bit double precision. +## - Other bugs...? +## +############### + +## Will test with optimizer_search_depth= [0,1,3,62] +let $depth= 0; +while ($depth<4) +{ + if ($depth==0) + { + set optimizer_search_depth=0; + } + if ($depth==1) + { + set optimizer_search_depth=1; + } + if ($depth==2) + { + set optimizer_search_depth=3; + } + if ($depth==3) + { + set optimizer_search_depth=62; + } + inc $depth; + + + ## Test pruning of joined table scans (ALL) + ## Prepare of QEP without timeout is heavily dependent + ## on maintaining correctly '#rows-sorted' plan + ## + let $query= SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS x; + let $i= 1; + while ($i < 61) + { + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I=x.I; + inc $i; + + select @@optimizer_prune_level; + select @@optimizer_search_depth; + eval EXPLAIN $query; + } + + ## Test pruning of joined table scans (ALL) + ## with multiple instances of same table. + ## (All instances being equally expensive) + let $query= SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS x; + let $i= 1; + while ($i <= 56) + { + let $t= t$i; + let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I; + inc $i; + + select @@optimizer_prune_level; + select @@optimizer_search_depth; + eval EXPLAIN $query; + } + + ## A mix of 25% EQ_REF / 75% ALL joins + ## + let $query= SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS x; + let $i= 1; + while ($i < 60) + { + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I = x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K = x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I = x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I = x.I; + inc $i; + + eval EXPLAIN $query; + } + + ## A mix of 50% EQ_REF / 50% ALL joins + ## + let $query= SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS x; + let $i= 1; + while ($i < 60) + { + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I = x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K = x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I = x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K = x.I; + inc $i; + + eval EXPLAIN $query; + } + + ## A mix of 75% EQ_REF / 25% ALL joins + ## + let $query= SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS x; + let $i= 1; + while ($i < 60) + { + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I = x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K = x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K = x.I; + inc $i; + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K = x.I; + inc $i; + + eval EXPLAIN $query; + } + + ## 100% EQ_REF joins + ## + let $query= SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS x; + let $i= 1; + while ($i < 61) + { + let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K=x.I; + inc $i; + + eval EXPLAIN $query; + } +} + +let $drop = DROP TABLE t100; +let $i= 1; +while ($i < 62) +{ + let $drop = $drop, t$i; + inc $i; +} +eval $drop; + +--enable_result_log + +show status like "optimizer%"; +SET OPTIMIZER_SEARCH_DEPTH = DEFAULT; + +--echo # +--echo # Bug found when testing greedy optimizer tests +--echo # + +CREATE TABLE t1 (pk INTEGER, + col_int_key INTEGER, + col_varchar_key VARCHAR(8), + PRIMARY KEY (pk), + KEY (col_varchar_key, col_int_key, pk)); + +INSERT INTO t1 values (1,1,"A"),(2,2,"B"); +explain SELECT * FROM t1 AS alias1 +WHERE alias1.col_varchar_key IN (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS SQ3_alias2 JOIN t1 AS SQ3_alias3 ON (SQ3_alias3.col_varchar_key = SQ3_alias2.col_varchar_key AND SQ3_alias3.pk = SQ3_alias2.pk)); +drop table t1; + +--echo # +--echo # This triggered an assert failure while testing +--echo # + +CREATE TABLE t1 (a int, b int, key(b)); +INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (7,4),(1,1); +CREATE TABLE t2 (d int); +INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (2),(3); +CREATE TABLE t3 (c int); +INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (5),(6); +SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE 5 IN (SELECT t1_a.a FROM t1 as t1_a WHERE 1 IN (SELECT t1_b.a FROM t1 as t1_b LEFT JOIN (t2 JOIN t3) ON (t1_b.a = t2.d) WHERE t1_b.b < 1)); +drop table t1,t2,t3; + +--enable_view_protocol + +--echo End of 10.0 tests |