summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-05-04 18:00:34 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-05-04 18:00:34 +0000
commit3f619478f796eddbba6e39502fe941b285dd97b1 (patch)
treee2c7b5777f728320e5b5542b6213fd3591ba51e2 /mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadmariadb-upstream.tar.xz
mariadb-upstream.zip
Adding upstream version 1:10.11.6.upstream/1%10.11.6upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test')
-rw-r--r--mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test960
1 files changed, 960 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test b/mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2a830c70
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mysql-test/main/greedy_optimizer.test
@@ -0,0 +1,960 @@
+--source include/have_innodb.inc
+
+#
+# A simple test of the greedy query optimization algorithm and the switches that
+# control the optimizationprocess.
+#
+
+#
+# Schema
+#
+--disable_warnings
+drop table if exists t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7;
+--enable_warnings
+
+set @save_join_cache_level=@@join_cache_level;
+set join_cache_level=1;
+
+create table t1 (
+ c11 integer,c12 integer,c13 integer,c14 integer,c15 integer,c16 integer,
+ primary key (c11)
+);
+create table t2 (
+ c21 integer,c22 integer,c23 integer,c24 integer,c25 integer,c26 integer
+);
+create table t3 (
+ c31 integer,c32 integer,c33 integer,c34 integer,c35 integer,c36 integer,
+ primary key (c31)
+);
+create table t4 (
+ c41 integer,c42 integer,c43 integer,c44 integer,c45 integer,c46 integer
+);
+create table t5 (
+ c51 integer,c52 integer,c53 integer,c54 integer,c55 integer,c56 integer,
+ primary key (c51)
+);
+create table t6 (
+ c61 integer,c62 integer,c63 integer,c64 integer,c65 integer,c66 integer
+);
+create table t7 (
+ c71 integer,c72 integer,c73 integer,c74 integer,c75 integer,c76 integer,
+ primary key (c71)
+);
+
+#
+# Data
+# cardinality(Ti) = cardinality(T(i-1)) + 3
+#
+insert into t1 values (1,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t1 values (2,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t1 values (3,2,3,4,5,6);
+
+insert into t2 values (1,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t2 values (2,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t2 values (3,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t2 values (4,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t2 values (5,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t2 values (6,2,3,4,5,6);
+
+insert into t3 values (1,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t3 values (2,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t3 values (3,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t3 values (4,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t3 values (5,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t3 values (6,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t3 values (7,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t3 values (8,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t3 values (9,2,3,4,5,6);
+
+insert into t4 values (1,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t4 values (2,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t4 values (3,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t4 values (4,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t4 values (5,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t4 values (6,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t4 values (7,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t4 values (8,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t4 values (9,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t4 values (10,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t4 values (11,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t4 values (12,2,3,4,5,6);
+
+insert into t5 values (1,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (2,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (3,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (4,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (5,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (6,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (7,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (8,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (9,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (10,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (11,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (12,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (13,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (14,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t5 values (15,2,3,4,5,6);
+
+insert into t6 values (1,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (2,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (3,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (4,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (5,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (6,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (7,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (8,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (9,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (10,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (11,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (12,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (13,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (14,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (15,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (16,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (17,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t6 values (18,2,3,4,5,6);
+
+insert into t7 values (1,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (2,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (3,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (4,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (5,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (6,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (7,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (8,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (9,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (10,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (11,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (12,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (13,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (14,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (15,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (16,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (17,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (18,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (19,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (20,2,3,4,5,6);
+insert into t7 values (21,2,3,4,5,6);
+
+#
+# The actual test begins here
+#
+
+# This value swithes back to the old implementation of 'find_best()'
+# set optimizer_search_depth=63; - old (independent of the optimizer_prune_level)
+#
+# These are the values for the parameters that control the greedy optimizer
+# (total 6 combinations - 3 for optimizer_search_depth, 2 for optimizer_prune_level):
+# 3:
+# set optimizer_search_depth=0; - automatic
+# set optimizer_search_depth=1; - min
+# set optimizer_search_depth=62; - max (default)
+# 2:
+# set optimizer_prune_level=0 - exhaustive;
+# set optimizer_prune_level=1 - heuristic; # default
+
+
+#
+# Compile several queries with all combinations of the query
+# optimizer parameters. Each test query has two variants, where
+# in the second variant the tables in the FROM clause are in
+# inverse order to the tables in the first variant.
+# Due to pre-sorting of tables before compilation, there should
+# be no difference in the plans for each two such query variants.
+#
+
+# First, for reference compile the test queries with the 'old' optimization
+# procedure 'find_best'. Notice that 'find_best' does not depend on the
+# choice of heuristic.
+
+set optimizer_search_depth=63, optimizer_prune_level=1;
+select @@optimizer_search_depth;
+
+# 6-table join, chain
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, star
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, clique
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+
+
+# Test the new optimization procedures
+
+set optimizer_prune_level=0;
+select @@optimizer_prune_level;
+
+set optimizer_search_depth=0;
+select @@optimizer_search_depth;
+
+# 6-table join, chain
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, star
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, clique
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+
+set optimizer_search_depth=1;
+select @@optimizer_search_depth;
+
+# 6-table join, chain
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, star
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, clique
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+
+set optimizer_search_depth=62;
+select @@optimizer_search_depth;
+
+# 6-table join, chain
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, star
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, clique
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+
+
+set optimizer_prune_level=2;
+select @@optimizer_prune_level;
+
+set optimizer_search_depth=0;
+select @@optimizer_search_depth;
+
+# 6-table join, chain
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, star
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, clique
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+
+set optimizer_search_depth=1;
+select @@optimizer_search_depth;
+
+# 6-table join, chain
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, star
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, clique
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+
+set optimizer_search_depth=62;
+select @@optimizer_search_depth;
+
+# 6-table join, chain
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c12 = t2.c21 and t2.c22 = t3.c31 and t3.c32 = t4.c41 and t4.c42 = t5.c51 and t5.c52 = t6.c61 and t6.c62 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, star
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+# 6-table join, clique
+explain select t1.c11 from t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+explain select t1.c11 from t7, t6, t5, t4, t3, t2, t1 where t1.c11 = t2.c21 and t1.c12 = t3.c31 and t1.c13 = t4.c41 and t1.c14 = t5.c51 and t1.c15 = t6.c61 and t1.c16 = t7.c71 and t2.c22 = t3.c32 and t2.c23 = t4.c42 and t2.c24 = t5.c52 and t2.c25 = t6.c62 and t2.c26 = t7.c72 and t3.c33 = t4.c43 and t3.c34 = t5.c53 and t3.c35 = t6.c63 and t3.c36 = t7.c73 and t4.c42 = t5.c54 and t4.c43 = t6.c64 and t4.c44 = t7.c74 and t5.c52 = t6.c65 and t5.c53 = t7.c75 and t6.c62 = t7.c76;
+show status like 'Last_query_cost';
+
+drop table t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7;
+
+
+#
+# Bug # 38795: Automatic search depth and nested join's results in server
+# crash
+#
+
+CREATE TABLE t1 (a int, b int, d int, i int); INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,1,1,1);
+CREATE TABLE t2 (b int, c int, j int); INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (1,1,1);
+CREATE TABLE t2_1 (j int); INSERT INTO t2_1 VALUES (1);
+CREATE TABLE t3 (c int, f int); INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (1,1);
+CREATE TABLE t3_1 (f int); INSERT INTO t3_1 VALUES (1);
+CREATE TABLE t4 (d int, e int, k int); INSERT INTO t4 VALUES (1,1,1);
+CREATE TABLE t4_1 (k int); INSERT INTO t4_1 VALUES (1);
+CREATE TABLE t5 (g int, d int, h int, l int); INSERT INTO t5 VALUES (1,1,1,1);
+CREATE TABLE t5_1 (l int); INSERT INTO t5_1 VALUES (1);
+
+SET optimizer_search_depth = 3;
+
+SELECT 1
+FROM t1
+LEFT JOIN (
+ t2 JOIN t3 ON t3.c = t2.c
+) ON t2.b = t1.b
+LEFT JOIN (
+ t4 JOIN t5 ON t5.d = t4.d
+) ON t4.d = t1.d
+;
+
+SELECT 1
+FROM t1
+LEFT JOIN (
+ t2 LEFT JOIN (t3 JOIN t3_1 ON t3.f = t3_1.f) ON t3.c = t2.c
+) ON t2.b = t1.b
+LEFT JOIN (
+ t4 JOIN t5 ON t5.d = t4.d
+) ON t4.d = t1.d
+;
+
+SELECT 1
+FROM t1
+LEFT JOIN (
+ (t2 JOIN t2_1 ON t2.j = t2_1.j) JOIN t3 ON t3.c = t2.c
+) ON t2.b = t1.b
+LEFT JOIN (
+ t4 JOIN t5 ON t5.d = t4.d
+) ON t4.d = t1.d
+;
+
+SELECT 1
+FROM t1
+LEFT JOIN (
+ t2 JOIN t3 ON t3.c = t2.c
+) ON t2.b = t1.b
+LEFT JOIN (
+ (t4 JOIN t4_1 ON t4.k = t4_1.k) LEFT JOIN t5 ON t5.d = t4.d
+) ON t4.d = t1.d
+;
+
+SELECT 1
+FROM t1
+LEFT JOIN (
+ t2 JOIN t3 ON t3.c = t2.c
+) ON t2.b = t1.b
+LEFT JOIN (
+ t4 LEFT JOIN (t5 JOIN t5_1 ON t5.l = t5_1.l) ON t5.d = t4.d
+) ON t4.d = t1.d
+;
+
+SET optimizer_search_depth = DEFAULT;
+DROP TABLE t1,t2,t2_1,t3,t3_1,t4,t4_1,t5,t5_1;
+
+set join_cache_level=@save_join_cache_level;
+
+--echo End of 5.0 tests
+
+--echo #
+--echo # Bug #59326: Greedy optimizer produce stupid query execution plans.
+--echo #
+
+#double warning for view protocol
+--disable_view_protocol
+
+CREATE TABLE t10(
+ K INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
+ I INT,
+ PRIMARY KEY(K)
+);
+INSERT INTO t10(I) VALUES (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(0);
+
+CREATE TABLE t100 LIKE t10;
+INSERT INTO t100(I)
+SELECT X.I FROM t10 AS X,t10 AS Y;
+
+CREATE TABLE t10000 LIKE t10;
+INSERT INTO t10000(I)
+SELECT X.I FROM t100 AS X, t100 AS Y;
+
+--disable_warnings
+let $total_handler_reads=
+select sum(variable_value) from information_schema.session_status
+ where VARIABLE_NAME like 'Handler_read%';
+--enable_warnings
+
+
+## All crossproducts should be executed in order t10,t100,t10000
+EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t10,t100,t10000;
+EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t10,t10000,t100;
+EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t100,t10,t10000;
+EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t100,t10000,t10;
+EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t10000,t10,t100;
+EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t10000,t100,t10;
+
+######
+## Ordering between T100,T10000 EQ-joined T10 will
+## normally be with smallest EQ-table joined first
+######
+let $query=
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.I;
+--source include/expect_qep.inc
+
+## However, swapping EQ_REF-joined tables gives the same cost
+let $query=
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.I;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+#####
+# Expect all variants of EQ joining t100 & t10000 with T10
+# to have same cost # handler_reads:
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.I;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.I;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.K;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.K;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t100,t10,t10000
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.K;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t100,t10000,t10
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.K;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10000,t10,t100
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.K;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10000,t100,t10
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.K;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+
+#####
+## EQ_REF Should be executed before table scan(ALL)
+## - Independent of #records in table being EQ_REF-joined
+#####
+#####
+# Expect: Join EQ_REF(t100) before ALL(t10000)
+let $query=
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.I=t10.I;
+--source include/expect_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.I=t10.I;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.I=t10.I;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+#####
+# Expect: Join EQ_REF(t10000) before ALL(t100) (star-join)
+let $query=
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100
+WHERE t100.I=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.I;
+--source include/expect_qep.inc
+
+--echo # See BUG#18352936
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000
+WHERE t100.I=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.I;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+--echo # See BUG#18352936
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100
+WHERE t100.I=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t10.I;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+#####
+# Expect: Join EQ_REF(t10000) before ALL(t100)
+let $query=
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100
+WHERE t100.I=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t100.I;
+--source include/expect_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000
+WHERE t100.I=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t100.I;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100
+WHERE t100.I=t10.I
+ AND t10000.K=t100.I;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+
+#####
+## EQ_REF & ALL join two instances of t10000 with t10:
+## Always EQ_REF join first before producing cross product
+#####
+
+#####
+# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(X) on X.K=t10.I' before 'cross' ALL(Y)
+let $query=
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y
+WHERE x.k=t10.i;
+--source include/expect_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y
+WHERE x.k=t10.i;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 y,t10000 x
+WHERE x.k=t10.i;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+#####
+# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(X) on X.K=t10.I' before ALL(Y)
+let $query=
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y
+WHERE x.k=t10.i
+ AND y.i=t10.i;
+--source include/expect_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y
+WHERE x.k=t10.i
+ AND y.i=t10.i;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 y,t10000 x
+WHERE x.k=t10.i
+ AND y.i=t10.i;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+#####
+# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(X) on X.K=t10.I' before ALL(Y)
+let $query=
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y
+WHERE x.k=t10.i
+ AND y.i=x.k;
+--source include/expect_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y
+WHERE x.k=t10.i
+ AND y.i=x.k;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 y,t10000 x
+WHERE x.k=t10.i
+ AND y.i=x.k;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+
+
+## Create indexes to test REF access
+CREATE INDEX IX ON t10(I);
+CREATE INDEX IX ON t100(I);
+CREATE INDEX IX ON t10000(I);
+
+########
+## EQ_REF Should be executed before 'REF'
+## - Independent of #records in table being EQ_REF-joined
+
+####
+# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(t100) on t100.K=t10.I' before REF(t10000)
+let $query=
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.I=t10.I;
+--source include/expect_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t100,t10000
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.I=t10.I;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000,t100
+WHERE t100.K=t10.I
+ AND t10000.I=t10.I;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+
+#####
+## EQ_REF & REF join two instances of t10000 with t10:
+#####
+
+#####
+## Expect this QEP, cost & #handler_read
+# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(X) on X.K=t10.I' before 'cross' ALL(Y)
+let $query=
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y
+WHERE x.k=t10.i;
+--source include/expect_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y
+WHERE x.k=t10.i;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 y,t10000 x
+WHERE x.k=t10.i;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+#####
+# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(X) on X.K=t10.I' before REF(Y)
+let $query=
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y
+WHERE x.k=t10.i
+ AND y.i=t10.i;
+--source include/expect_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y
+WHERE x.k=t10.i
+ AND y.i=t10.i;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 y,t10000 x
+WHERE x.k=t10.i
+ AND y.i=t10.i;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+#####
+# Expected QEP: 'join EQ_REF(X) on X.K=t10.I' before REF(Y)
+let $query=
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y
+WHERE x.k=t10.i
+ AND y.i=x.k;
+--source include/expect_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 x,t10000 y
+WHERE x.k=t10.i
+ AND y.i=x.k;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+let $query=
+SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t10,t10000 y,t10000 x
+WHERE x.k=t10.i
+ AND y.i=x.k;
+--source include/check_qep.inc
+
+########
+
+
+
+########
+
+--echo #
+--echo # Test improved capabilities of analyzing complex query
+--echo # plans without restricting 'optimizer_search_depth'.
+--echo # Fix problems like those reported as bug#41740 & bug#58225.
+--echo #
+--echo # EPLAIN of queries using T1-T62 will timeout/hang wo/ fixes
+--echo #
+
+DROP TABLE t10, t10000;
+
+--disable_result_log
+
+let $tabledef=
+( K INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
+ I INT,
+ A INT,
+ PRIMARY KEY(K), KEY IX(A)
+) engine = InnoDB;
+
+let $analyze = ANALYZE TABLE t100;
+
+let $i= 1;
+while ($i < 62)
+{
+ let $create= CREATE TABLE t$i $tabledef;
+ eval $create;
+
+ let $insert =
+ INSERT INTO t$i(I,A) SELECT X.K,X.K FROM t100 AS X, t100 AS Y WHERE X.K < 20 AND Y.K <= $i;
+ eval $insert;
+
+ let $analyze = $analyze, t$i;
+ inc $i;
+}
+eval $analyze;
+
+set optimizer_prune_level=default;
+#--enable_result_log
+#select @@optimizer_prune_level;
+#--disable_result_log
+flush status;
+
+#################
+## The EXPLAIN'ed query itself can't be part of the verified
+## result as the QEP is not 100% predictable due to variation
+## in statistics from the engines. This is believed to be
+## caused by:
+## - Variations in table fill degree.
+## - 'Fuzzy' statistics provided by engines.
+## - Round errors caused by 'cost' calculation using
+## 'only' 64-bit double precision.
+## - Other bugs...?
+##
+###############
+
+## Will test with optimizer_search_depth= [0,1,3,62]
+let $depth= 0;
+while ($depth<4)
+{
+ if ($depth==0)
+ {
+ set optimizer_search_depth=0;
+ }
+ if ($depth==1)
+ {
+ set optimizer_search_depth=1;
+ }
+ if ($depth==2)
+ {
+ set optimizer_search_depth=3;
+ }
+ if ($depth==3)
+ {
+ set optimizer_search_depth=62;
+ }
+ inc $depth;
+
+
+ ## Test pruning of joined table scans (ALL)
+ ## Prepare of QEP without timeout is heavily dependent
+ ## on maintaining correctly '#rows-sorted' plan
+ ##
+ let $query= SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS x;
+ let $i= 1;
+ while ($i < 61)
+ {
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I=x.I;
+ inc $i;
+
+ select @@optimizer_prune_level;
+ select @@optimizer_search_depth;
+ eval EXPLAIN $query;
+ }
+
+ ## Test pruning of joined table scans (ALL)
+ ## with multiple instances of same table.
+ ## (All instances being equally expensive)
+ let $query= SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS x;
+ let $i= 1;
+ while ($i <= 56)
+ {
+ let $t= t$i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN $t as t$i ON t$i.I=x.I;
+ inc $i;
+
+ select @@optimizer_prune_level;
+ select @@optimizer_search_depth;
+ eval EXPLAIN $query;
+ }
+
+ ## A mix of 25% EQ_REF / 75% ALL joins
+ ##
+ let $query= SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS x;
+ let $i= 1;
+ while ($i < 60)
+ {
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I = x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K = x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I = x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I = x.I;
+ inc $i;
+
+ eval EXPLAIN $query;
+ }
+
+ ## A mix of 50% EQ_REF / 50% ALL joins
+ ##
+ let $query= SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS x;
+ let $i= 1;
+ while ($i < 60)
+ {
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I = x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K = x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I = x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K = x.I;
+ inc $i;
+
+ eval EXPLAIN $query;
+ }
+
+ ## A mix of 75% EQ_REF / 25% ALL joins
+ ##
+ let $query= SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS x;
+ let $i= 1;
+ while ($i < 60)
+ {
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.I = x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K = x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K = x.I;
+ inc $i;
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K = x.I;
+ inc $i;
+
+ eval EXPLAIN $query;
+ }
+
+ ## 100% EQ_REF joins
+ ##
+ let $query= SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS x;
+ let $i= 1;
+ while ($i < 61)
+ {
+ let $query= $query JOIN t$i ON t$i.K=x.I;
+ inc $i;
+
+ eval EXPLAIN $query;
+ }
+}
+
+let $drop = DROP TABLE t100;
+let $i= 1;
+while ($i < 62)
+{
+ let $drop = $drop, t$i;
+ inc $i;
+}
+eval $drop;
+
+--enable_result_log
+
+show status like "optimizer%";
+SET OPTIMIZER_SEARCH_DEPTH = DEFAULT;
+
+--echo #
+--echo # Bug found when testing greedy optimizer tests
+--echo #
+
+CREATE TABLE t1 (pk INTEGER,
+ col_int_key INTEGER,
+ col_varchar_key VARCHAR(8),
+ PRIMARY KEY (pk),
+ KEY (col_varchar_key, col_int_key, pk));
+
+INSERT INTO t1 values (1,1,"A"),(2,2,"B");
+explain SELECT * FROM t1 AS alias1
+WHERE alias1.col_varchar_key IN (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t1 AS SQ3_alias2 JOIN t1 AS SQ3_alias3 ON (SQ3_alias3.col_varchar_key = SQ3_alias2.col_varchar_key AND SQ3_alias3.pk = SQ3_alias2.pk));
+drop table t1;
+
+--echo #
+--echo # This triggered an assert failure while testing
+--echo #
+
+CREATE TABLE t1 (a int, b int, key(b));
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (7,4),(1,1);
+CREATE TABLE t2 (d int);
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (2),(3);
+CREATE TABLE t3 (c int);
+INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (5),(6);
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE 5 IN (SELECT t1_a.a FROM t1 as t1_a WHERE 1 IN (SELECT t1_b.a FROM t1 as t1_b LEFT JOIN (t2 JOIN t3) ON (t1_b.a = t2.d) WHERE t1_b.b < 1));
+drop table t1,t2,t3;
+
+--enable_view_protocol
+
+--echo End of 10.0 tests