summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/src/sgml/html/btree-behavior.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/src/sgml/html/btree-behavior.html')
-rw-r--r--doc/src/sgml/html/btree-behavior.html118
1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/html/btree-behavior.html b/doc/src/sgml/html/btree-behavior.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b3da748
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/html/btree-behavior.html
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title>63.2. Behavior of B-Tree Operator Classes</title><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="stylesheet.css" /><link rev="made" href="pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org" /><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.79.1" /><link rel="prev" href="btree-intro.html" title="63.1. Introduction" /><link rel="next" href="btree-support-funcs.html" title="63.3. B-Tree Support Functions" /></head><body id="docContent" class="container-fluid col-10"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/transitional" class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="5" align="center">63.2. Behavior of B-Tree Operator Classes</th></tr><tr><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="btree-intro.html" title="63.1. Introduction">Prev</a> </td><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="u" href="btree.html" title="Chapter 63. B-Tree Indexes">Up</a></td><th width="60%" align="center">Chapter 63. B-Tree Indexes</th><td width="10%" align="right"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 13.4 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="10%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="btree-support-funcs.html" title="63.3. B-Tree Support Functions">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr></hr></div><div class="sect1" id="BTREE-BEHAVIOR"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">63.2. Behavior of B-Tree Operator Classes</h2></div></div></div><p>
+ As shown in <a class="xref" href="xindex.html#XINDEX-BTREE-STRAT-TABLE" title="Table 37.3. B-Tree Strategies">Table 37.3</a>, a btree operator
+ class must provide five comparison operators,
+ <code class="literal">&lt;</code>,
+ <code class="literal">&lt;=</code>,
+ <code class="literal">=</code>,
+ <code class="literal">&gt;=</code> and
+ <code class="literal">&gt;</code>.
+ One might expect that <code class="literal">&lt;&gt;</code> should also be part of
+ the operator class, but it is not, because it would almost never be
+ useful to use a <code class="literal">&lt;&gt;</code> WHERE clause in an index
+ search. (For some purposes, the planner treats <code class="literal">&lt;&gt;</code>
+ as associated with a btree operator class; but it finds that operator via
+ the <code class="literal">=</code> operator's negator link, rather than
+ from <code class="structname">pg_amop</code>.)
+ </p><p>
+ When several data types share near-identical sorting semantics, their
+ operator classes can be grouped into an operator family. Doing so is
+ advantageous because it allows the planner to make deductions about
+ cross-type comparisons. Each operator class within the family should
+ contain the single-type operators (and associated support functions)
+ for its input data type, while cross-type comparison operators and
+ support functions are <span class="quote">“<span class="quote">loose</span>”</span> in the family. It is
+ recommendable that a complete set of cross-type operators be included
+ in the family, thus ensuring that the planner can represent any
+ comparison conditions that it deduces from transitivity.
+ </p><p>
+ There are some basic assumptions that a btree operator family must
+ satisfy:
+ </p><div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: disc; "><li class="listitem"><p>
+ An <code class="literal">=</code> operator must be an equivalence relation; that
+ is, for all non-null values <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em>,
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>, <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em> of the
+ data type:
+
+ </p><div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: circle; "><li class="listitem"><p>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal">=</code>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> is true
+ (<em class="firstterm">reflexive law</em>)
+ </p></li><li class="listitem"><p>
+ if <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal">=</code>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>,
+ then <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em> <code class="literal">=</code>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em>
+ (<em class="firstterm">symmetric law</em>)
+ </p></li><li class="listitem"><p>
+ if <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal">=</code>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em> and <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>
+ <code class="literal">=</code> <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em>,
+ then <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal">=</code>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em>
+ (<em class="firstterm">transitive law</em>)
+ </p></li></ul></div><p>
+ </p></li><li class="listitem"><p>
+ A <code class="literal">&lt;</code> operator must be a strong ordering relation;
+ that is, for all non-null values <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em>,
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>, <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em>:
+
+ </p><div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: circle; "><li class="listitem"><p>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal">&lt;</code>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> is false
+ (<em class="firstterm">irreflexive law</em>)
+ </p></li><li class="listitem"><p>
+ if <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal">&lt;</code>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>
+ and <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em> <code class="literal">&lt;</code>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em>,
+ then <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal">&lt;</code>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em>
+ (<em class="firstterm">transitive law</em>)
+ </p></li></ul></div><p>
+ </p></li><li class="listitem"><p>
+ Furthermore, the ordering is total; that is, for all non-null
+ values <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em>, <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>:
+
+ </p><div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: circle; "><li class="listitem"><p>
+ exactly one of <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal">&lt;</code>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>, <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em>
+ <code class="literal">=</code> <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>, and
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em> <code class="literal">&lt;</code>
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> is true
+ (<em class="firstterm">trichotomy law</em>)
+ </p></li></ul></div><p>
+
+ (The trichotomy law justifies the definition of the comparison support
+ function, of course.)
+ </p></li></ul></div><p>
+ The other three operators are defined in terms of <code class="literal">=</code>
+ and <code class="literal">&lt;</code> in the obvious way, and must act consistently
+ with them.
+ </p><p>
+ For an operator family supporting multiple data types, the above laws must
+ hold when <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em>, <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>,
+ <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em> are taken from any data types in the family.
+ The transitive laws are the trickiest to ensure, as in cross-type
+ situations they represent statements that the behaviors of two or three
+ different operators are consistent.
+ As an example, it would not work to put <code class="type">float8</code>
+ and <code class="type">numeric</code> into the same operator family, at least not with
+ the current semantics that <code class="type">numeric</code> values are converted
+ to <code class="type">float8</code> for comparison to a <code class="type">float8</code>. Because
+ of the limited accuracy of <code class="type">float8</code>, this means there are
+ distinct <code class="type">numeric</code> values that will compare equal to the
+ same <code class="type">float8</code> value, and thus the transitive law would fail.
+ </p><p>
+ Another requirement for a multiple-data-type family is that any implicit
+ or binary-coercion casts that are defined between data types included in
+ the operator family must not change the associated sort ordering.
+ </p><p>
+ It should be fairly clear why a btree index requires these laws to hold
+ within a single data type: without them there is no ordering to arrange
+ the keys with. Also, index searches using a comparison key of a
+ different data type require comparisons to behave sanely across two
+ data types. The extensions to three or more data types within a family
+ are not strictly required by the btree index mechanism itself, but the
+ planner relies on them for optimization purposes.
+ </p></div><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/transitional" class="navfooter"><hr></hr><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="btree-intro.html" title="63.1. Introduction">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="btree.html" title="Chapter 63. B-Tree Indexes">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="btree-support-funcs.html" title="63.3. B-Tree Support Functions">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">63.1. Introduction </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 13.4 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> 63.3. B-Tree Support Functions</td></tr></table></div></body></html> \ No newline at end of file