summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsplitloc.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsplitloc.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsplitloc.c1190
1 files changed, 1190 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsplitloc.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsplitloc.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fcfc23c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsplitloc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,1190 @@
+/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ *
+ * nbtsplitloc.c
+ * Choose split point code for Postgres btree implementation.
+ *
+ * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2020, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
+ * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
+ *
+ *
+ * IDENTIFICATION
+ * src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtsplitloc.c
+ *
+ *-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ */
+#include "postgres.h"
+
+#include "access/nbtree.h"
+#include "storage/lmgr.h"
+
+typedef enum
+{
+ /* strategy for searching through materialized list of split points */
+ SPLIT_DEFAULT, /* give some weight to truncation */
+ SPLIT_MANY_DUPLICATES, /* find minimally distinguishing point */
+ SPLIT_SINGLE_VALUE /* leave left page almost full */
+} FindSplitStrat;
+
+typedef struct
+{
+ /* details of free space left by split */
+ int16 curdelta; /* current leftfree/rightfree delta */
+ int16 leftfree; /* space left on left page post-split */
+ int16 rightfree; /* space left on right page post-split */
+
+ /* split point identifying fields (returned by _bt_findsplitloc) */
+ OffsetNumber firstrightoff; /* first origpage item on rightpage */
+ bool newitemonleft; /* new item goes on left, or right? */
+
+} SplitPoint;
+
+typedef struct
+{
+ /* context data for _bt_recsplitloc */
+ Relation rel; /* index relation */
+ Page origpage; /* page undergoing split */
+ IndexTuple newitem; /* new item (cause of page split) */
+ Size newitemsz; /* size of newitem (includes line pointer) */
+ bool is_leaf; /* T if splitting a leaf page */
+ bool is_rightmost; /* T if splitting rightmost page on level */
+ OffsetNumber newitemoff; /* where the new item is to be inserted */
+ int leftspace; /* space available for items on left page */
+ int rightspace; /* space available for items on right page */
+ int olddataitemstotal; /* space taken by old items */
+ Size minfirstrightsz; /* smallest firstright size */
+
+ /* candidate split point data */
+ int maxsplits; /* maximum number of splits */
+ int nsplits; /* current number of splits */
+ SplitPoint *splits; /* all candidate split points for page */
+ int interval; /* current range of acceptable split points */
+} FindSplitData;
+
+static void _bt_recsplitloc(FindSplitData *state,
+ OffsetNumber firstrightoff, bool newitemonleft,
+ int olddataitemstoleft,
+ Size firstrightofforigpagetuplesz);
+static void _bt_deltasortsplits(FindSplitData *state, double fillfactormult,
+ bool usemult);
+static int _bt_splitcmp(const void *arg1, const void *arg2);
+static bool _bt_afternewitemoff(FindSplitData *state, OffsetNumber maxoff,
+ int leaffillfactor, bool *usemult);
+static bool _bt_adjacenthtid(ItemPointer lowhtid, ItemPointer highhtid);
+static OffsetNumber _bt_bestsplitloc(FindSplitData *state, int perfectpenalty,
+ bool *newitemonleft, FindSplitStrat strategy);
+static int _bt_defaultinterval(FindSplitData *state);
+static int _bt_strategy(FindSplitData *state, SplitPoint *leftpage,
+ SplitPoint *rightpage, FindSplitStrat *strategy);
+static void _bt_interval_edges(FindSplitData *state,
+ SplitPoint **leftinterval, SplitPoint **rightinterval);
+static inline int _bt_split_penalty(FindSplitData *state, SplitPoint *split);
+static inline IndexTuple _bt_split_lastleft(FindSplitData *state,
+ SplitPoint *split);
+static inline IndexTuple _bt_split_firstright(FindSplitData *state,
+ SplitPoint *split);
+
+
+/*
+ * _bt_findsplitloc() -- find an appropriate place to split a page.
+ *
+ * The main goal here is to equalize the free space that will be on each
+ * split page, *after accounting for the inserted tuple*. (If we fail to
+ * account for it, we might find ourselves with too little room on the page
+ * that it needs to go into!)
+ *
+ * If the page is the rightmost page on its level, we instead try to arrange
+ * to leave the left split page fillfactor% full. In this way, when we are
+ * inserting successively increasing keys (consider sequences, timestamps,
+ * etc) we will end up with a tree whose pages are about fillfactor% full,
+ * instead of the 50% full result that we'd get without this special case.
+ * This is the same as nbtsort.c produces for a newly-created tree. Note
+ * that leaf and nonleaf pages use different fillfactors. Note also that
+ * there are a number of further special cases where fillfactor is not
+ * applied in the standard way.
+ *
+ * We are passed the intended insert position of the new tuple, expressed as
+ * the offsetnumber of the tuple it must go in front of (this could be
+ * maxoff+1 if the tuple is to go at the end). The new tuple itself is also
+ * passed, since it's needed to give some weight to how effective suffix
+ * truncation will be. The implementation picks the split point that
+ * maximizes the effectiveness of suffix truncation from a small list of
+ * alternative candidate split points that leave each side of the split with
+ * about the same share of free space. Suffix truncation is secondary to
+ * equalizing free space, except in cases with large numbers of duplicates.
+ * Note that it is always assumed that caller goes on to perform truncation,
+ * even with pg_upgrade'd indexes where that isn't actually the case
+ * (!heapkeyspace indexes). See nbtree/README for more information about
+ * suffix truncation.
+ *
+ * We return the index of the first existing tuple that should go on the
+ * righthand page (which is called firstrightoff), plus a boolean
+ * indicating whether the new tuple goes on the left or right page. You
+ * can think of the returned state as a point _between_ two adjacent data
+ * items (laftleft and firstright data items) on an imaginary version of
+ * origpage that already includes newitem. The bool is necessary to
+ * disambiguate the case where firstrightoff == newitemoff (i.e. it is
+ * sometimes needed to determine if the firstright tuple for the split is
+ * newitem rather than the tuple from origpage at offset firstrightoff).
+ */
+OffsetNumber
+_bt_findsplitloc(Relation rel,
+ Page origpage,
+ OffsetNumber newitemoff,
+ Size newitemsz,
+ IndexTuple newitem,
+ bool *newitemonleft)
+{
+ BTPageOpaque opaque;
+ int leftspace,
+ rightspace,
+ olddataitemstotal,
+ olddataitemstoleft,
+ perfectpenalty,
+ leaffillfactor;
+ FindSplitData state;
+ FindSplitStrat strategy;
+ ItemId itemid;
+ OffsetNumber offnum,
+ maxoff,
+ firstrightoff;
+ double fillfactormult;
+ bool usemult;
+ SplitPoint leftpage,
+ rightpage;
+
+ opaque = (BTPageOpaque) PageGetSpecialPointer(origpage);
+ maxoff = PageGetMaxOffsetNumber(origpage);
+
+ /* Total free space available on a btree page, after fixed overhead */
+ leftspace = rightspace =
+ PageGetPageSize(origpage) - SizeOfPageHeaderData -
+ MAXALIGN(sizeof(BTPageOpaqueData));
+
+ /* The right page will have the same high key as the old page */
+ if (!P_RIGHTMOST(opaque))
+ {
+ itemid = PageGetItemId(origpage, P_HIKEY);
+ rightspace -= (int) (MAXALIGN(ItemIdGetLength(itemid)) +
+ sizeof(ItemIdData));
+ }
+
+ /* Count up total space in data items before actually scanning 'em */
+ olddataitemstotal = rightspace - (int) PageGetExactFreeSpace(origpage);
+ leaffillfactor = BTGetFillFactor(rel);
+
+ /* Passed-in newitemsz is MAXALIGNED but does not include line pointer */
+ newitemsz += sizeof(ItemIdData);
+ state.rel = rel;
+ state.origpage = origpage;
+ state.newitem = newitem;
+ state.newitemsz = newitemsz;
+ state.is_leaf = P_ISLEAF(opaque);
+ state.is_rightmost = P_RIGHTMOST(opaque);
+ state.leftspace = leftspace;
+ state.rightspace = rightspace;
+ state.olddataitemstotal = olddataitemstotal;
+ state.minfirstrightsz = SIZE_MAX;
+ state.newitemoff = newitemoff;
+
+ /* newitem cannot be a posting list item */
+ Assert(!BTreeTupleIsPosting(newitem));
+
+ /*
+ * maxsplits should never exceed maxoff because there will be at most as
+ * many candidate split points as there are points _between_ tuples, once
+ * you imagine that the new item is already on the original page (the
+ * final number of splits may be slightly lower because not all points
+ * between tuples will be legal).
+ */
+ state.maxsplits = maxoff;
+ state.splits = palloc(sizeof(SplitPoint) * state.maxsplits);
+ state.nsplits = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Scan through the data items and calculate space usage for a split at
+ * each possible position
+ */
+ olddataitemstoleft = 0;
+
+ for (offnum = P_FIRSTDATAKEY(opaque);
+ offnum <= maxoff;
+ offnum = OffsetNumberNext(offnum))
+ {
+ Size itemsz;
+
+ itemid = PageGetItemId(origpage, offnum);
+ itemsz = MAXALIGN(ItemIdGetLength(itemid)) + sizeof(ItemIdData);
+
+ /*
+ * When item offset number is not newitemoff, neither side of the
+ * split can be newitem. Record a split after the previous data item
+ * from original page, but before the current data item from original
+ * page. (_bt_recsplitloc() will reject the split when there are no
+ * previous items, which we rely on.)
+ */
+ if (offnum < newitemoff)
+ _bt_recsplitloc(&state, offnum, false, olddataitemstoleft, itemsz);
+ else if (offnum > newitemoff)
+ _bt_recsplitloc(&state, offnum, true, olddataitemstoleft, itemsz);
+ else
+ {
+ /*
+ * Record a split after all "offnum < newitemoff" original page
+ * data items, but before newitem
+ */
+ _bt_recsplitloc(&state, offnum, false, olddataitemstoleft, itemsz);
+
+ /*
+ * Record a split after newitem, but before data item from
+ * original page at offset newitemoff/current offset
+ */
+ _bt_recsplitloc(&state, offnum, true, olddataitemstoleft, itemsz);
+ }
+
+ olddataitemstoleft += itemsz;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Record a split after all original page data items, but before newitem.
+ * (Though only when it's possible that newitem will end up alone on new
+ * right page.)
+ */
+ Assert(olddataitemstoleft == olddataitemstotal);
+ if (newitemoff > maxoff)
+ _bt_recsplitloc(&state, newitemoff, false, olddataitemstotal, 0);
+
+ /*
+ * I believe it is not possible to fail to find a feasible split, but just
+ * in case ...
+ */
+ if (state.nsplits == 0)
+ elog(ERROR, "could not find a feasible split point for index \"%s\"",
+ RelationGetRelationName(rel));
+
+ /*
+ * Start search for a split point among list of legal split points. Give
+ * primary consideration to equalizing available free space in each half
+ * of the split initially (start with default strategy), while applying
+ * rightmost and split-after-new-item optimizations where appropriate.
+ * Either of the two other fallback strategies may be required for cases
+ * with a large number of duplicates around the original/space-optimal
+ * split point.
+ *
+ * Default strategy gives some weight to suffix truncation in deciding a
+ * split point on leaf pages. It attempts to select a split point where a
+ * distinguishing attribute appears earlier in the new high key for the
+ * left side of the split, in order to maximize the number of trailing
+ * attributes that can be truncated away. Only candidate split points
+ * that imply an acceptable balance of free space on each side are
+ * considered. See _bt_defaultinterval().
+ */
+ if (!state.is_leaf)
+ {
+ /* fillfactormult only used on rightmost page */
+ usemult = state.is_rightmost;
+ fillfactormult = BTREE_NONLEAF_FILLFACTOR / 100.0;
+ }
+ else if (state.is_rightmost)
+ {
+ /* Rightmost leaf page -- fillfactormult always used */
+ usemult = true;
+ fillfactormult = leaffillfactor / 100.0;
+ }
+ else if (_bt_afternewitemoff(&state, maxoff, leaffillfactor, &usemult))
+ {
+ /*
+ * New item inserted at rightmost point among a localized grouping on
+ * a leaf page -- apply "split after new item" optimization, either by
+ * applying leaf fillfactor multiplier, or by choosing the exact split
+ * point that leaves newitem as lastleft. (usemult is set for us.)
+ */
+ if (usemult)
+ {
+ /* fillfactormult should be set based on leaf fillfactor */
+ fillfactormult = leaffillfactor / 100.0;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* find precise split point after newitemoff */
+ for (int i = 0; i < state.nsplits; i++)
+ {
+ SplitPoint *split = state.splits + i;
+
+ if (split->newitemonleft &&
+ newitemoff == split->firstrightoff)
+ {
+ pfree(state.splits);
+ *newitemonleft = true;
+ return newitemoff;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Cannot legally split after newitemoff; proceed with split
+ * without using fillfactor multiplier. This is defensive, and
+ * should never be needed in practice.
+ */
+ fillfactormult = 0.50;
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Other leaf page. 50:50 page split. */
+ usemult = false;
+ /* fillfactormult not used, but be tidy */
+ fillfactormult = 0.50;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Save leftmost and rightmost splits for page before original ordinal
+ * sort order is lost by delta/fillfactormult sort
+ */
+ leftpage = state.splits[0];
+ rightpage = state.splits[state.nsplits - 1];
+
+ /* Give split points a fillfactormult-wise delta, and sort on deltas */
+ _bt_deltasortsplits(&state, fillfactormult, usemult);
+
+ /* Determine split interval for default strategy */
+ state.interval = _bt_defaultinterval(&state);
+
+ /*
+ * Determine if default strategy/split interval will produce a
+ * sufficiently distinguishing split, or if we should change strategies.
+ * Alternative strategies change the range of split points that are
+ * considered acceptable (split interval), and possibly change
+ * fillfactormult, in order to deal with pages with a large number of
+ * duplicates gracefully.
+ *
+ * Pass low and high splits for the entire page (actually, they're for an
+ * imaginary version of the page that includes newitem). These are used
+ * when the initial split interval encloses split points that are full of
+ * duplicates, and we need to consider if it's even possible to avoid
+ * appending a heap TID.
+ */
+ perfectpenalty = _bt_strategy(&state, &leftpage, &rightpage, &strategy);
+
+ if (strategy == SPLIT_DEFAULT)
+ {
+ /*
+ * Default strategy worked out (always works out with internal page).
+ * Original split interval still stands.
+ */
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Many duplicates strategy is used when a heap TID would otherwise be
+ * appended, but the page isn't completely full of logical duplicates.
+ *
+ * The split interval is widened to include all legal candidate split
+ * points. There might be a few as two distinct values in the whole-page
+ * split interval, though it's also possible that most of the values on
+ * the page are unique. The final split point will either be to the
+ * immediate left or to the immediate right of the group of duplicate
+ * tuples that enclose the first/delta-optimal split point (perfect
+ * penalty was set so that the lowest delta split point that avoids
+ * appending a heap TID will be chosen). Maximizing the number of
+ * attributes that can be truncated away is not a goal of the many
+ * duplicates strategy.
+ *
+ * Single value strategy is used when it is impossible to avoid appending
+ * a heap TID. It arranges to leave the left page very full. This
+ * maximizes space utilization in cases where tuples with the same
+ * attribute values span many pages. Newly inserted duplicates will tend
+ * to have higher heap TID values, so we'll end up splitting to the right
+ * consistently. (Single value strategy is harmless though not
+ * particularly useful with !heapkeyspace indexes.)
+ */
+ else if (strategy == SPLIT_MANY_DUPLICATES)
+ {
+ Assert(state.is_leaf);
+ /* Shouldn't try to truncate away extra user attributes */
+ Assert(perfectpenalty ==
+ IndexRelationGetNumberOfKeyAttributes(state.rel));
+ /* No need to resort splits -- no change in fillfactormult/deltas */
+ state.interval = state.nsplits;
+ }
+ else if (strategy == SPLIT_SINGLE_VALUE)
+ {
+ Assert(state.is_leaf);
+ /* Split near the end of the page */
+ usemult = true;
+ fillfactormult = BTREE_SINGLEVAL_FILLFACTOR / 100.0;
+ /* Resort split points with new delta */
+ _bt_deltasortsplits(&state, fillfactormult, usemult);
+ /* Appending a heap TID is unavoidable, so interval of 1 is fine */
+ state.interval = 1;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Search among acceptable split points (using final split interval) for
+ * the entry that has the lowest penalty, and is therefore expected to
+ * maximize fan-out. Sets *newitemonleft for us.
+ */
+ firstrightoff = _bt_bestsplitloc(&state, perfectpenalty, newitemonleft,
+ strategy);
+ pfree(state.splits);
+
+ return firstrightoff;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Subroutine to record a particular point between two tuples (possibly the
+ * new item) on page (ie, combination of firstrightoff and newitemonleft
+ * settings) in *state for later analysis. This is also a convenient point to
+ * check if the split is legal (if it isn't, it won't be recorded).
+ *
+ * firstrightoff is the offset of the first item on the original page that
+ * goes to the right page, and firstrightofforigpagetuplesz is the size of
+ * that tuple. firstrightoff can be > max offset, which means that all the
+ * old items go to the left page and only the new item goes to the right page.
+ * We don't actually use firstrightofforigpagetuplesz in that case (actually,
+ * we don't use it for _any_ split where the firstright tuple happens to be
+ * newitem).
+ *
+ * olddataitemstoleft is the total size of all old items to the left of the
+ * split point that is recorded here when legal. Should not include
+ * newitemsz, since that is handled here.
+ */
+static void
+_bt_recsplitloc(FindSplitData *state,
+ OffsetNumber firstrightoff,
+ bool newitemonleft,
+ int olddataitemstoleft,
+ Size firstrightofforigpagetuplesz)
+{
+ int16 leftfree,
+ rightfree;
+ Size firstrightsz;
+ Size postingsz = 0;
+ bool newitemisfirstright;
+
+ /* Is the new item going to be split point's firstright tuple? */
+ newitemisfirstright = (firstrightoff == state->newitemoff &&
+ !newitemonleft);
+
+ if (newitemisfirstright)
+ firstrightsz = state->newitemsz;
+ else
+ {
+ firstrightsz = firstrightofforigpagetuplesz;
+
+ /*
+ * Calculate suffix truncation space saving when firstright tuple is a
+ * posting list tuple, though only when the tuple is over 64 bytes
+ * including line pointer overhead (arbitrary). This avoids accessing
+ * the tuple in cases where its posting list must be very small (if
+ * tuple has one at all).
+ *
+ * Note: We don't do this in the case where firstright tuple is
+ * newitem, since newitem cannot have a posting list.
+ */
+ if (state->is_leaf && firstrightsz > 64)
+ {
+ ItemId itemid;
+ IndexTuple newhighkey;
+
+ itemid = PageGetItemId(state->origpage, firstrightoff);
+ newhighkey = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(state->origpage, itemid);
+
+ if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(newhighkey))
+ postingsz = IndexTupleSize(newhighkey) -
+ BTreeTupleGetPostingOffset(newhighkey);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Account for all the old tuples */
+ leftfree = state->leftspace - olddataitemstoleft;
+ rightfree = state->rightspace -
+ (state->olddataitemstotal - olddataitemstoleft);
+
+ /*
+ * The first item on the right page becomes the high key of the left page;
+ * therefore it counts against left space as well as right space (we
+ * cannot assume that suffix truncation will make it any smaller). When
+ * index has included attributes, then those attributes of left page high
+ * key will be truncated leaving that page with slightly more free space.
+ * However, that shouldn't affect our ability to find valid split
+ * location, since we err in the direction of being pessimistic about free
+ * space on the left half. Besides, even when suffix truncation of
+ * non-TID attributes occurs, the new high key often won't even be a
+ * single MAXALIGN() quantum smaller than the firstright tuple it's based
+ * on.
+ *
+ * If we are on the leaf level, assume that suffix truncation cannot avoid
+ * adding a heap TID to the left half's new high key when splitting at the
+ * leaf level. In practice the new high key will often be smaller and
+ * will rarely be larger, but conservatively assume the worst case. We do
+ * go to the trouble of subtracting away posting list overhead, though
+ * only when it looks like it will make an appreciable difference.
+ * (Posting lists are the only case where truncation will typically make
+ * the final high key far smaller than firstright, so being a bit more
+ * precise there noticeably improves the balance of free space.)
+ */
+ if (state->is_leaf)
+ leftfree -= (int16) (firstrightsz +
+ MAXALIGN(sizeof(ItemPointerData)) -
+ postingsz);
+ else
+ leftfree -= (int16) firstrightsz;
+
+ /* account for the new item */
+ if (newitemonleft)
+ leftfree -= (int16) state->newitemsz;
+ else
+ rightfree -= (int16) state->newitemsz;
+
+ /*
+ * If we are not on the leaf level, we will be able to discard the key
+ * data from the first item that winds up on the right page.
+ */
+ if (!state->is_leaf)
+ rightfree += (int16) firstrightsz -
+ (int16) (MAXALIGN(sizeof(IndexTupleData)) + sizeof(ItemIdData));
+
+ /* Record split if legal */
+ if (leftfree >= 0 && rightfree >= 0)
+ {
+ Assert(state->nsplits < state->maxsplits);
+
+ /* Determine smallest firstright tuple size among legal splits */
+ state->minfirstrightsz = Min(state->minfirstrightsz, firstrightsz);
+
+ state->splits[state->nsplits].curdelta = 0;
+ state->splits[state->nsplits].leftfree = leftfree;
+ state->splits[state->nsplits].rightfree = rightfree;
+ state->splits[state->nsplits].firstrightoff = firstrightoff;
+ state->splits[state->nsplits].newitemonleft = newitemonleft;
+ state->nsplits++;
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Subroutine to assign space deltas to materialized array of candidate split
+ * points based on current fillfactor, and to sort array using that fillfactor
+ */
+static void
+_bt_deltasortsplits(FindSplitData *state, double fillfactormult,
+ bool usemult)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < state->nsplits; i++)
+ {
+ SplitPoint *split = state->splits + i;
+ int16 delta;
+
+ if (usemult)
+ delta = fillfactormult * split->leftfree -
+ (1.0 - fillfactormult) * split->rightfree;
+ else
+ delta = split->leftfree - split->rightfree;
+
+ if (delta < 0)
+ delta = -delta;
+
+ /* Save delta */
+ split->curdelta = delta;
+ }
+
+ qsort(state->splits, state->nsplits, sizeof(SplitPoint), _bt_splitcmp);
+}
+
+/*
+ * qsort-style comparator used by _bt_deltasortsplits()
+ */
+static int
+_bt_splitcmp(const void *arg1, const void *arg2)
+{
+ SplitPoint *split1 = (SplitPoint *) arg1;
+ SplitPoint *split2 = (SplitPoint *) arg2;
+
+ if (split1->curdelta > split2->curdelta)
+ return 1;
+ if (split1->curdelta < split2->curdelta)
+ return -1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Subroutine to determine whether or not a non-rightmost leaf page should be
+ * split immediately after the would-be original page offset for the
+ * new/incoming tuple (or should have leaf fillfactor applied when new item is
+ * to the right on original page). This is appropriate when there is a
+ * pattern of localized monotonically increasing insertions into a composite
+ * index, where leading attribute values form local groupings, and we
+ * anticipate further insertions of the same/current grouping (new item's
+ * grouping) in the near future. This can be thought of as a variation on
+ * applying leaf fillfactor during rightmost leaf page splits, since cases
+ * that benefit will converge on packing leaf pages leaffillfactor% full over
+ * time.
+ *
+ * We may leave extra free space remaining on the rightmost page of a "most
+ * significant column" grouping of tuples if that grouping never ends up
+ * having future insertions that use the free space. That effect is
+ * self-limiting; a future grouping that becomes the "nearest on the right"
+ * grouping of the affected grouping usually puts the extra free space to good
+ * use.
+ *
+ * Caller uses optimization when routine returns true, though the exact action
+ * taken by caller varies. Caller uses original leaf page fillfactor in
+ * standard way rather than using the new item offset directly when *usemult
+ * was also set to true here. Otherwise, caller applies optimization by
+ * locating the legal split point that makes the new tuple the lastleft tuple
+ * for the split.
+ */
+static bool
+_bt_afternewitemoff(FindSplitData *state, OffsetNumber maxoff,
+ int leaffillfactor, bool *usemult)
+{
+ int16 nkeyatts;
+ ItemId itemid;
+ IndexTuple tup;
+ int keepnatts;
+
+ Assert(state->is_leaf && !state->is_rightmost);
+
+ nkeyatts = IndexRelationGetNumberOfKeyAttributes(state->rel);
+
+ /* Single key indexes not considered here */
+ if (nkeyatts == 1)
+ return false;
+
+ /* Ascending insertion pattern never inferred when new item is first */
+ if (state->newitemoff == P_FIRSTKEY)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Only apply optimization on pages with equisized tuples, since ordinal
+ * keys are likely to be fixed-width. Testing if the new tuple is
+ * variable width directly might also work, but that fails to apply the
+ * optimization to indexes with a numeric_ops attribute.
+ *
+ * Conclude that page has equisized tuples when the new item is the same
+ * width as the smallest item observed during pass over page, and other
+ * non-pivot tuples must be the same width as well. (Note that the
+ * possibly-truncated existing high key isn't counted in
+ * olddataitemstotal, and must be subtracted from maxoff.)
+ */
+ if (state->newitemsz != state->minfirstrightsz)
+ return false;
+ if (state->newitemsz * (maxoff - 1) != state->olddataitemstotal)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Avoid applying optimization when tuples are wider than a tuple
+ * consisting of two non-NULL int8/int64 attributes (or four non-NULL
+ * int4/int32 attributes)
+ */
+ if (state->newitemsz >
+ MAXALIGN(sizeof(IndexTupleData) + sizeof(int64) * 2) +
+ sizeof(ItemIdData))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * At least the first attribute's value must be equal to the corresponding
+ * value in previous tuple to apply optimization. New item cannot be a
+ * duplicate, either.
+ *
+ * Handle case where new item is to the right of all items on the existing
+ * page. This is suggestive of monotonically increasing insertions in
+ * itself, so the "heap TID adjacency" test is not applied here.
+ */
+ if (state->newitemoff > maxoff)
+ {
+ itemid = PageGetItemId(state->origpage, maxoff);
+ tup = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(state->origpage, itemid);
+ keepnatts = _bt_keep_natts_fast(state->rel, tup, state->newitem);
+
+ if (keepnatts > 1 && keepnatts <= nkeyatts)
+ {
+ *usemult = true;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * "Low cardinality leading column, high cardinality suffix column"
+ * indexes with a random insertion pattern (e.g., an index with a boolean
+ * column, such as an index on '(book_is_in_print, book_isbn)') present us
+ * with a risk of consistently misapplying the optimization. We're
+ * willing to accept very occasional misapplication of the optimization,
+ * provided the cases where we get it wrong are rare and self-limiting.
+ *
+ * Heap TID adjacency strongly suggests that the item just to the left was
+ * inserted very recently, which limits overapplication of the
+ * optimization. Besides, all inappropriate cases triggered here will
+ * still split in the middle of the page on average.
+ */
+ itemid = PageGetItemId(state->origpage, OffsetNumberPrev(state->newitemoff));
+ tup = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(state->origpage, itemid);
+ /* Do cheaper test first */
+ if (BTreeTupleIsPosting(tup) ||
+ !_bt_adjacenthtid(&tup->t_tid, &state->newitem->t_tid))
+ return false;
+ /* Check same conditions as rightmost item case, too */
+ keepnatts = _bt_keep_natts_fast(state->rel, tup, state->newitem);
+
+ if (keepnatts > 1 && keepnatts <= nkeyatts)
+ {
+ double interp = (double) state->newitemoff / ((double) maxoff + 1);
+ double leaffillfactormult = (double) leaffillfactor / 100.0;
+
+ /*
+ * Don't allow caller to split after a new item when it will result in
+ * a split point to the right of the point that a leaf fillfactor
+ * split would use -- have caller apply leaf fillfactor instead
+ */
+ *usemult = interp > leaffillfactormult;
+
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Subroutine for determining if two heap TIDS are "adjacent".
+ *
+ * Adjacent means that the high TID is very likely to have been inserted into
+ * heap relation immediately after the low TID, probably during the current
+ * transaction.
+ */
+static bool
+_bt_adjacenthtid(ItemPointer lowhtid, ItemPointer highhtid)
+{
+ BlockNumber lowblk,
+ highblk;
+
+ lowblk = ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(lowhtid);
+ highblk = ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(highhtid);
+
+ /* Make optimistic assumption of adjacency when heap blocks match */
+ if (lowblk == highblk)
+ return true;
+
+ /* When heap block one up, second offset should be FirstOffsetNumber */
+ if (lowblk + 1 == highblk &&
+ ItemPointerGetOffsetNumber(highhtid) == FirstOffsetNumber)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Subroutine to find the "best" split point among candidate split points.
+ * The best split point is the split point with the lowest penalty among split
+ * points that fall within current/final split interval. Penalty is an
+ * abstract score, with a definition that varies depending on whether we're
+ * splitting a leaf page or an internal page. See _bt_split_penalty() for
+ * details.
+ *
+ * "perfectpenalty" is assumed to be the lowest possible penalty among
+ * candidate split points. This allows us to return early without wasting
+ * cycles on calculating the first differing attribute for all candidate
+ * splits when that clearly cannot improve our choice (or when we only want a
+ * minimally distinguishing split point, and don't want to make the split any
+ * more unbalanced than is necessary).
+ *
+ * We return the index of the first existing tuple that should go on the right
+ * page, plus a boolean indicating if new item is on left of split point.
+ */
+static OffsetNumber
+_bt_bestsplitloc(FindSplitData *state, int perfectpenalty,
+ bool *newitemonleft, FindSplitStrat strategy)
+{
+ int bestpenalty,
+ lowsplit;
+ int highsplit = Min(state->interval, state->nsplits);
+ SplitPoint *final;
+
+ bestpenalty = INT_MAX;
+ lowsplit = 0;
+ for (int i = lowsplit; i < highsplit; i++)
+ {
+ int penalty;
+
+ penalty = _bt_split_penalty(state, state->splits + i);
+
+ if (penalty < bestpenalty)
+ {
+ bestpenalty = penalty;
+ lowsplit = i;
+ }
+
+ if (penalty <= perfectpenalty)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ final = &state->splits[lowsplit];
+
+ /*
+ * There is a risk that the "many duplicates" strategy will repeatedly do
+ * the wrong thing when there are monotonically decreasing insertions to
+ * the right of a large group of duplicates. Repeated splits could leave
+ * a succession of right half pages with free space that can never be
+ * used. This must be avoided.
+ *
+ * Consider the example of the leftmost page in a single integer attribute
+ * NULLS FIRST index which is almost filled with NULLs. Monotonically
+ * decreasing integer insertions might cause the same leftmost page to
+ * split repeatedly at the same point. Each split derives its new high
+ * key from the lowest current value to the immediate right of the large
+ * group of NULLs, which will always be higher than all future integer
+ * insertions, directing all future integer insertions to the same
+ * leftmost page.
+ */
+ if (strategy == SPLIT_MANY_DUPLICATES && !state->is_rightmost &&
+ !final->newitemonleft && final->firstrightoff >= state->newitemoff &&
+ final->firstrightoff < state->newitemoff + 9)
+ {
+ /*
+ * Avoid the problem by performing a 50:50 split when the new item is
+ * just to the right of the would-be "many duplicates" split point.
+ * (Note that the test used for an insert that is "just to the right"
+ * of the split point is conservative.)
+ */
+ final = &state->splits[0];
+ }
+
+ *newitemonleft = final->newitemonleft;
+ return final->firstrightoff;
+}
+
+#define LEAF_SPLIT_DISTANCE 0.050
+#define INTERNAL_SPLIT_DISTANCE 0.075
+
+/*
+ * Return a split interval to use for the default strategy. This is a limit
+ * on the number of candidate split points to give further consideration to.
+ * Only a fraction of all candidate splits points (those located at the start
+ * of the now-sorted splits array) fall within the split interval. Split
+ * interval is applied within _bt_bestsplitloc().
+ *
+ * Split interval represents an acceptable range of split points -- those that
+ * have leftfree and rightfree values that are acceptably balanced. The final
+ * split point chosen is the split point with the lowest "penalty" among split
+ * points in this split interval (unless we change our entire strategy, in
+ * which case the interval also changes -- see _bt_strategy()).
+ *
+ * The "Prefix B-Trees" paper calls split interval sigma l for leaf splits,
+ * and sigma b for internal ("branch") splits. It's hard to provide a
+ * theoretical justification for the size of the split interval, though it's
+ * clear that a small split interval can make tuples on level L+1 much smaller
+ * on average, without noticeably affecting space utilization on level L.
+ * (Note that the way that we calculate split interval might need to change if
+ * suffix truncation is taught to truncate tuples "within" the last
+ * attribute/datum for data types like text, which is more or less how it is
+ * assumed to work in the paper.)
+ */
+static int
+_bt_defaultinterval(FindSplitData *state)
+{
+ SplitPoint *spaceoptimal;
+ int16 tolerance,
+ lowleftfree,
+ lowrightfree,
+ highleftfree,
+ highrightfree;
+
+ /*
+ * Determine leftfree and rightfree values that are higher and lower than
+ * we're willing to tolerate. Note that the final split interval will be
+ * about 10% of nsplits in the common case where all non-pivot tuples
+ * (data items) from a leaf page are uniformly sized. We're a bit more
+ * aggressive when splitting internal pages.
+ */
+ if (state->is_leaf)
+ tolerance = state->olddataitemstotal * LEAF_SPLIT_DISTANCE;
+ else
+ tolerance = state->olddataitemstotal * INTERNAL_SPLIT_DISTANCE;
+
+ /* First candidate split point is the most evenly balanced */
+ spaceoptimal = state->splits;
+ lowleftfree = spaceoptimal->leftfree - tolerance;
+ lowrightfree = spaceoptimal->rightfree - tolerance;
+ highleftfree = spaceoptimal->leftfree + tolerance;
+ highrightfree = spaceoptimal->rightfree + tolerance;
+
+ /*
+ * Iterate through split points, starting from the split immediately after
+ * 'spaceoptimal'. Find the first split point that divides free space so
+ * unevenly that including it in the split interval would be unacceptable.
+ */
+ for (int i = 1; i < state->nsplits; i++)
+ {
+ SplitPoint *split = state->splits + i;
+
+ /* Cannot use curdelta here, since its value is often weighted */
+ if (split->leftfree < lowleftfree || split->rightfree < lowrightfree ||
+ split->leftfree > highleftfree || split->rightfree > highrightfree)
+ return i;
+ }
+
+ return state->nsplits;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Subroutine to decide whether split should use default strategy/initial
+ * split interval, or whether it should finish splitting the page using
+ * alternative strategies (this is only possible with leaf pages).
+ *
+ * Caller uses alternative strategy (or sticks with default strategy) based
+ * on how *strategy is set here. Return value is "perfect penalty", which is
+ * passed to _bt_bestsplitloc() as a final constraint on how far caller is
+ * willing to go to avoid appending a heap TID when using the many duplicates
+ * strategy (it also saves _bt_bestsplitloc() useless cycles).
+ */
+static int
+_bt_strategy(FindSplitData *state, SplitPoint *leftpage,
+ SplitPoint *rightpage, FindSplitStrat *strategy)
+{
+ IndexTuple leftmost,
+ rightmost;
+ SplitPoint *leftinterval,
+ *rightinterval;
+ int perfectpenalty;
+ int indnkeyatts = IndexRelationGetNumberOfKeyAttributes(state->rel);
+
+ /* Assume that alternative strategy won't be used for now */
+ *strategy = SPLIT_DEFAULT;
+
+ /*
+ * Use smallest observed firstright item size for entire page (actually,
+ * entire imaginary version of page that includes newitem) as perfect
+ * penalty on internal pages. This can save cycles in the common case
+ * where most or all splits (not just splits within interval) have
+ * firstright tuples that are the same size.
+ */
+ if (!state->is_leaf)
+ return state->minfirstrightsz;
+
+ /*
+ * Use leftmost and rightmost tuples from leftmost and rightmost splits in
+ * current split interval
+ */
+ _bt_interval_edges(state, &leftinterval, &rightinterval);
+ leftmost = _bt_split_lastleft(state, leftinterval);
+ rightmost = _bt_split_firstright(state, rightinterval);
+
+ /*
+ * If initial split interval can produce a split point that will at least
+ * avoid appending a heap TID in new high key, we're done. Finish split
+ * with default strategy and initial split interval.
+ */
+ perfectpenalty = _bt_keep_natts_fast(state->rel, leftmost, rightmost);
+ if (perfectpenalty <= indnkeyatts)
+ return perfectpenalty;
+
+ /*
+ * Work out how caller should finish split when even their "perfect"
+ * penalty for initial/default split interval indicates that the interval
+ * does not contain even a single split that avoids appending a heap TID.
+ *
+ * Use the leftmost split's lastleft tuple and the rightmost split's
+ * firstright tuple to assess every possible split.
+ */
+ leftmost = _bt_split_lastleft(state, leftpage);
+ rightmost = _bt_split_firstright(state, rightpage);
+
+ /*
+ * If page (including new item) has many duplicates but is not entirely
+ * full of duplicates, a many duplicates strategy split will be performed.
+ * If page is entirely full of duplicates, a single value strategy split
+ * will be performed.
+ */
+ perfectpenalty = _bt_keep_natts_fast(state->rel, leftmost, rightmost);
+ if (perfectpenalty <= indnkeyatts)
+ {
+ *strategy = SPLIT_MANY_DUPLICATES;
+
+ /*
+ * Many duplicates strategy should split at either side the group of
+ * duplicates that enclose the delta-optimal split point. Return
+ * indnkeyatts rather than the true perfect penalty to make that
+ * happen. (If perfectpenalty was returned here then low cardinality
+ * composite indexes could have continual unbalanced splits.)
+ *
+ * Note that caller won't go through with a many duplicates split in
+ * rare cases where it looks like there are ever-decreasing insertions
+ * to the immediate right of the split point. This must happen just
+ * before a final decision is made, within _bt_bestsplitloc().
+ */
+ return indnkeyatts;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Single value strategy is only appropriate with ever-increasing heap
+ * TIDs; otherwise, original default strategy split should proceed to
+ * avoid pathological performance. Use page high key to infer if this is
+ * the rightmost page among pages that store the same duplicate value.
+ * This should not prevent insertions of heap TIDs that are slightly out
+ * of order from using single value strategy, since that's expected with
+ * concurrent inserters of the same duplicate value.
+ */
+ else if (state->is_rightmost)
+ *strategy = SPLIT_SINGLE_VALUE;
+ else
+ {
+ ItemId itemid;
+ IndexTuple hikey;
+
+ itemid = PageGetItemId(state->origpage, P_HIKEY);
+ hikey = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(state->origpage, itemid);
+ perfectpenalty = _bt_keep_natts_fast(state->rel, hikey,
+ state->newitem);
+ if (perfectpenalty <= indnkeyatts)
+ *strategy = SPLIT_SINGLE_VALUE;
+ else
+ {
+ /*
+ * Have caller finish split using default strategy, since page
+ * does not appear to be the rightmost page for duplicates of the
+ * value the page is filled with
+ */
+ }
+ }
+
+ return perfectpenalty;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Subroutine to locate leftmost and rightmost splits for current/default
+ * split interval. Note that it will be the same split iff there is only one
+ * split in interval.
+ */
+static void
+_bt_interval_edges(FindSplitData *state, SplitPoint **leftinterval,
+ SplitPoint **rightinterval)
+{
+ int highsplit = Min(state->interval, state->nsplits);
+ SplitPoint *deltaoptimal;
+
+ deltaoptimal = state->splits;
+ *leftinterval = NULL;
+ *rightinterval = NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * Delta is an absolute distance to optimal split point, so both the
+ * leftmost and rightmost split point will usually be at the end of the
+ * array
+ */
+ for (int i = highsplit - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+ {
+ SplitPoint *distant = state->splits + i;
+
+ if (distant->firstrightoff < deltaoptimal->firstrightoff)
+ {
+ if (*leftinterval == NULL)
+ *leftinterval = distant;
+ }
+ else if (distant->firstrightoff > deltaoptimal->firstrightoff)
+ {
+ if (*rightinterval == NULL)
+ *rightinterval = distant;
+ }
+ else if (!distant->newitemonleft && deltaoptimal->newitemonleft)
+ {
+ /*
+ * "incoming tuple will become firstright" (distant) is to the
+ * left of "incoming tuple will become lastleft" (delta-optimal)
+ */
+ Assert(distant->firstrightoff == state->newitemoff);
+ if (*leftinterval == NULL)
+ *leftinterval = distant;
+ }
+ else if (distant->newitemonleft && !deltaoptimal->newitemonleft)
+ {
+ /*
+ * "incoming tuple will become lastleft" (distant) is to the right
+ * of "incoming tuple will become firstright" (delta-optimal)
+ */
+ Assert(distant->firstrightoff == state->newitemoff);
+ if (*rightinterval == NULL)
+ *rightinterval = distant;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* There was only one or two splits in initial split interval */
+ Assert(distant == deltaoptimal);
+ if (*leftinterval == NULL)
+ *leftinterval = distant;
+ if (*rightinterval == NULL)
+ *rightinterval = distant;
+ }
+
+ if (*leftinterval && *rightinterval)
+ return;
+ }
+
+ Assert(false);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Subroutine to find penalty for caller's candidate split point.
+ *
+ * On leaf pages, penalty is the attribute number that distinguishes each side
+ * of a split. It's the last attribute that needs to be included in new high
+ * key for left page. It can be greater than the number of key attributes in
+ * cases where a heap TID will need to be appended during truncation.
+ *
+ * On internal pages, penalty is simply the size of the firstright tuple for
+ * the split (including line pointer overhead). This tuple will become the
+ * new high key for the left page.
+ */
+static inline int
+_bt_split_penalty(FindSplitData *state, SplitPoint *split)
+{
+ IndexTuple lastleft;
+ IndexTuple firstright;
+
+ if (!state->is_leaf)
+ {
+ ItemId itemid;
+
+ if (!split->newitemonleft &&
+ split->firstrightoff == state->newitemoff)
+ return state->newitemsz;
+
+ itemid = PageGetItemId(state->origpage, split->firstrightoff);
+
+ return MAXALIGN(ItemIdGetLength(itemid)) + sizeof(ItemIdData);
+ }
+
+ lastleft = _bt_split_lastleft(state, split);
+ firstright = _bt_split_firstright(state, split);
+
+ return _bt_keep_natts_fast(state->rel, lastleft, firstright);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Subroutine to get a lastleft IndexTuple for a split point
+ */
+static inline IndexTuple
+_bt_split_lastleft(FindSplitData *state, SplitPoint *split)
+{
+ ItemId itemid;
+
+ if (split->newitemonleft && split->firstrightoff == state->newitemoff)
+ return state->newitem;
+
+ itemid = PageGetItemId(state->origpage,
+ OffsetNumberPrev(split->firstrightoff));
+ return (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(state->origpage, itemid);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Subroutine to get a firstright IndexTuple for a split point
+ */
+static inline IndexTuple
+_bt_split_firstright(FindSplitData *state, SplitPoint *split)
+{
+ ItemId itemid;
+
+ if (!split->newitemonleft && split->firstrightoff == state->newitemoff)
+ return state->newitem;
+
+ itemid = PageGetItemId(state->origpage, split->firstrightoff);
+ return (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(state->origpage, itemid);
+}