1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title>41.1. The Query Tree</title><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="stylesheet.css" /><link rev="made" href="pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org" /><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets Vsnapshot" /><link rel="prev" href="rules.html" title="Chapter 41. The Rule System" /><link rel="next" href="rules-views.html" title="41.2. Views and the Rule System" /></head><body id="docContent" class="container-fluid col-10"><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="5" align="center">41.1. The Query Tree</th></tr><tr><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="rules.html" title="Chapter 41. The Rule System">Prev</a> </td><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="u" href="rules.html" title="Chapter 41. The Rule System">Up</a></td><th width="60%" align="center">Chapter 41. The Rule System</th><td width="10%" align="right"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 15.5 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="10%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="rules-views.html" title="41.2. Views and the Rule System">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr /></div><div class="sect1" id="QUERYTREE"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">41.1. The Query Tree</h2></div></div></div><a id="id-1.8.6.6.2" class="indexterm"></a><p>
To understand how the rule system works it is necessary to know
when it is invoked and what its input and results are.
</p><p>
The rule system is located between the parser and the planner.
It takes the output of the parser, one query tree, and the user-defined
rewrite rules, which are also
query trees with some extra information, and creates zero or more
query trees as result. So its input and output are always things
the parser itself could have produced and thus, anything it sees
is basically representable as an <acronym class="acronym">SQL</acronym> statement.
</p><p>
Now what is a query tree? It is an internal representation of an
<acronym class="acronym">SQL</acronym> statement where the single parts that it is
built from are stored separately. These query trees can be shown
in the server log if you set the configuration parameters
<code class="varname">debug_print_parse</code>,
<code class="varname">debug_print_rewritten</code>, or
<code class="varname">debug_print_plan</code>. The rule actions are also
stored as query trees, in the system catalog
<code class="structname">pg_rewrite</code>. They are not formatted like
the log output, but they contain exactly the same information.
</p><p>
Reading a raw query tree requires some experience. But since
<acronym class="acronym">SQL</acronym> representations of query trees are
sufficient to understand the rule system, this chapter will not
teach how to read them.
</p><p>
When reading the <acronym class="acronym">SQL</acronym> representations of the
query trees in this chapter it is necessary to be able to identify
the parts the statement is broken into when it is in the query tree
structure. The parts of a query tree are
</p><div class="variablelist"><dl class="variablelist"><dt><span class="term">
the command type
</span></dt><dd><p>
This is a simple value telling which command
(<code class="command">SELECT</code>, <code class="command">INSERT</code>,
<code class="command">UPDATE</code>, <code class="command">DELETE</code>) produced
the query tree.
</p></dd><dt><span class="term">
the range table
<a id="id-1.8.6.6.7.2.2.1.1" class="indexterm"></a>
</span></dt><dd><p>
The range table is a list of relations that are used in the query.
In a <code class="command">SELECT</code> statement these are the relations given after
the <code class="literal">FROM</code> key word.
</p><p>
Every range table entry identifies a table or view and tells
by which name it is called in the other parts of the query.
In the query tree, the range table entries are referenced by
number rather than by name, so here it doesn't matter if there
are duplicate names as it would in an <acronym class="acronym">SQL</acronym>
statement. This can happen after the range tables of rules
have been merged in. The examples in this chapter will not have
this situation.
</p></dd><dt><span class="term">
the result relation
</span></dt><dd><p>
This is an index into the range table that identifies the
relation where the results of the query go.
</p><p>
<code class="command">SELECT</code> queries don't have a result
relation. (The special case of <code class="command">SELECT INTO</code> is
mostly identical to <code class="command">CREATE TABLE</code> followed by
<code class="literal">INSERT ... SELECT</code>, and is not discussed
separately here.)
</p><p>
For <code class="command">INSERT</code>, <code class="command">UPDATE</code>, and
<code class="command">DELETE</code> commands, the result relation is the table
(or view!) where the changes are to take effect.
</p></dd><dt><span class="term">
the target list
<a id="id-1.8.6.6.7.2.4.1.1" class="indexterm"></a>
</span></dt><dd><p>
The target list is a list of expressions that define the
result of the query. In the case of a
<code class="command">SELECT</code>, these expressions are the ones that
build the final output of the query. They correspond to the
expressions between the key words <code class="command">SELECT</code>
and <code class="command">FROM</code>. (<code class="literal">*</code> is just an
abbreviation for all the column names of a relation. It is
expanded by the parser into the individual columns, so the
rule system never sees it.)
</p><p>
<code class="command">DELETE</code> commands don't need a normal target list
because they don't produce any result. Instead, the planner
adds a special <acronym class="acronym">CTID</acronym> entry to the empty target list,
to allow the executor to find the row to be deleted.
(<acronym class="acronym">CTID</acronym> is added when the result relation is an ordinary
table. If it is a view, a whole-row variable is added instead, by
the rule system, as described in <a class="xref" href="rules-views.html#RULES-VIEWS-UPDATE" title="41.2.4. Updating a View">Section 41.2.4</a>.)
</p><p>
For <code class="command">INSERT</code> commands, the target list describes
the new rows that should go into the result relation. It consists of the
expressions in the <code class="literal">VALUES</code> clause or the ones from the
<code class="command">SELECT</code> clause in <code class="literal">INSERT
... SELECT</code>. The first step of the rewrite process adds
target list entries for any columns that were not assigned to by
the original command but have defaults. Any remaining columns (with
neither a given value nor a default) will be filled in by the
planner with a constant null expression.
</p><p>
For <code class="command">UPDATE</code> commands, the target list
describes the new rows that should replace the old ones. In the
rule system, it contains just the expressions from the <code class="literal">SET
column = expression</code> part of the command. The planner will
handle missing columns by inserting expressions that copy the values
from the old row into the new one. Just as for <code class="command">DELETE</code>,
a <acronym class="acronym">CTID</acronym> or whole-row variable is added so that
the executor can identify the old row to be updated.
</p><p>
Every entry in the target list contains an expression that can
be a constant value, a variable pointing to a column of one
of the relations in the range table, a parameter, or an expression
tree made of function calls, constants, variables, operators, etc.
</p></dd><dt><span class="term">
the qualification
</span></dt><dd><p>
The query's qualification is an expression much like one of
those contained in the target list entries. The result value of
this expression is a Boolean that tells whether the operation
(<code class="command">INSERT</code>, <code class="command">UPDATE</code>,
<code class="command">DELETE</code>, or <code class="command">SELECT</code>) for the
final result row should be executed or not. It corresponds to the <code class="literal">WHERE</code> clause
of an <acronym class="acronym">SQL</acronym> statement.
</p></dd><dt><span class="term">
the join tree
</span></dt><dd><p>
The query's join tree shows the structure of the <code class="literal">FROM</code> clause.
For a simple query like <code class="literal">SELECT ... FROM a, b, c</code>, the join tree is just
a list of the <code class="literal">FROM</code> items, because we are allowed to join them in
any order. But when <code class="literal">JOIN</code> expressions, particularly outer joins,
are used, we have to join in the order shown by the joins.
In that case, the join tree shows the structure of the <code class="literal">JOIN</code> expressions. The
restrictions associated with particular <code class="literal">JOIN</code> clauses (from <code class="literal">ON</code> or
<code class="literal">USING</code> expressions) are stored as qualification expressions attached
to those join-tree nodes. It turns out to be convenient to store
the top-level <code class="literal">WHERE</code> expression as a qualification attached to the
top-level join-tree item, too. So really the join tree represents
both the <code class="literal">FROM</code> and <code class="literal">WHERE</code> clauses of a <code class="command">SELECT</code>.
</p></dd><dt><span class="term">
the others
</span></dt><dd><p>
The other parts of the query tree like the <code class="literal">ORDER BY</code>
clause aren't of interest here. The rule system
substitutes some entries there while applying rules, but that
doesn't have much to do with the fundamentals of the rule
system.
</p></dd></dl></div><p>
</p></div><div class="navfooter"><hr /><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="rules.html" title="Chapter 41. The Rule System">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="rules.html" title="Chapter 41. The Rule System">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="rules-views.html" title="41.2. Views and the Rule System">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">Chapter 41. The Rule System </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 15.5 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> 41.2. Views and the Rule System</td></tr></table></div></body></html>
|
