summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/debian/patches-rt/0136-tasklets-Replace-spin-wait-in-tasklet_unlock_wait.patch
blob: 06678b89f9c55f3ca398912afb15dd363ff56e5c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
From f90cb17ba85876d41e375928685a9190586dbd65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:42:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 136/323] tasklets: Replace spin wait in tasklet_unlock_wait()
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.215-rt107.tar.xz

tasklet_unlock_wait() spin waits for TASKLET_STATE_RUN to be cleared. This
is wasting CPU cycles in a tight loop which is especially painful in a
guest when the CPU running the tasklet is scheduled out.

tasklet_unlock_wait() is invoked from tasklet_kill() which is used in
teardown paths and not performance critical at all. Replace the spin wait
with wait_var_event().

There are no users of tasklet_unlock_wait() which are invoked from atomic
contexts. The usage in tasklet_disable() has been replaced temporarily with
the spin waiting variant until the atomic users are fixed up and will be
converted to the sleep wait variant later.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 include/linux/interrupt.h | 13 ++-----------
 kernel/softirq.c          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index fe085c46f2107..c4fafbfa28a6f 100644
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -664,17 +664,8 @@ static inline int tasklet_trylock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 	return !test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state);
 }
 
-static inline void tasklet_unlock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
-{
-	smp_mb__before_atomic();
-	clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state);
-}
-
-static inline void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t)
-{
-	while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &t->state))
-		cpu_relax();
-}
+void tasklet_unlock(struct tasklet_struct *t);
+void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t);
 
 /*
  * Do not use in new code. Waiting for tasklets from atomic contexts is
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index d5bfd5e661fcd..06bca024ce45b 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/smpboot.h>
 #include <linux/tick.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/wait_bit.h>
 
 #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
 #include <trace/events/irq.h>
@@ -619,6 +620,23 @@ void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(tasklet_kill);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+void tasklet_unlock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+	smp_mb__before_atomic();
+	clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &t->state);
+	smp_mb__after_atomic();
+	wake_up_var(&t->state);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tasklet_unlock);
+
+void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+	wait_var_event(&t->state, !test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &t->state));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tasklet_unlock_wait);
+#endif
+
 void __init softirq_init(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
-- 
2.44.0