summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/debian/patches-rt/0155-x86-fpu-Make-kernel-FPU-protection-RT-friendly.patch
blob: d679b3bcd995aaaa2a988657d2e9e27ba64510e2 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
From ebfd3ddaa3c75b0a3e840304bdb3def7321aaeab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:09:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 155/323] x86/fpu: Make kernel FPU protection RT friendly
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.215-rt107.tar.xz

Non RT kernels need to protect FPU against preemption and bottom half
processing. This is achieved by disabling bottom halfs via
local_bh_disable() which implictly disables preemption.

On RT kernels this protection mechanism is not sufficient because
local_bh_disable() does not disable preemption. It serializes bottom half
related processing via a CPU local lock.

As bottom halfs are running always in thread context on RT kernels
disabling preemption is the proper choice as it implicitly prevents bottom
half processing.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201027101349.588965083@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h
index 5174c0a640ef3..ad2fee7853108 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h
@@ -43,15 +43,29 @@ static inline void kernel_fpu_begin(void)
  *
  * local_bh_disable() protects against both preemption and soft interrupts
  * on !RT kernels.
+ *
+ * On RT kernels local_bh_disable() is not sufficient because it only
+ * serializes soft interrupt related sections via a local lock, but stays
+ * preemptible. Disabling preemption is the right choice here as bottom
+ * half processing is always in thread context on RT kernels so it
+ * implicitly prevents bottom half processing as well.
+ *
+ * Disabling preemption also serializes against kernel_fpu_begin().
  */
 static inline void fpregs_lock(void)
 {
-	local_bh_disable();
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+		local_bh_disable();
+	else
+		preempt_disable();
 }
 
 static inline void fpregs_unlock(void)
 {
-	local_bh_enable();
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+		local_bh_enable();
+	else
+		preempt_enable();
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU
-- 
2.44.0