summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/boost/libs/math/test/test_erf.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/boost/libs/math/test/test_erf.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/boost/libs/math/test/test_erf.cpp296
1 files changed, 296 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/boost/libs/math/test/test_erf.cpp b/src/boost/libs/math/test/test_erf.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8fed443a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/boost/libs/math/test/test_erf.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,296 @@
+// Copyright John Maddock 2006.
+// Copyright Paul A. Bristow 2007
+// Use, modification and distribution are subject to the
+// Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying file
+// LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
+
+#include <pch_light.hpp>
+#include "test_erf.hpp"
+
+//
+// DESCRIPTION:
+// ~~~~~~~~~~~~
+//
+// This file tests the functions erf, erfc, and the inverses
+// erf_inv and erfc_inv. There are two sets of tests, spot
+// tests which compare our results with selected values computed
+// using the online special function calculator at
+// functions.wolfram.com, while the bulk of the accuracy tests
+// use values generated with NTL::RR at 1000-bit precision
+// and our generic versions of these functions.
+//
+// Note that when this file is first run on a new platform many of
+// these tests will fail: the default accuracy is 1 epsilon which
+// is too tight for most platforms. In this situation you will
+// need to cast a human eye over the error rates reported and make
+// a judgement as to whether they are acceptable. Either way please
+// report the results to the Boost mailing list. Acceptable rates of
+// error are marked up below as a series of regular expressions that
+// identify the compiler/stdlib/platform/data-type/test-data/test-function
+// along with the maximum expected peek and RMS mean errors for that
+// test.
+//
+
+void expected_results()
+{
+ //
+ // Define the max and mean errors expected for
+ // various compilers and platforms.
+ //
+ const char* largest_type;
+#ifndef BOOST_MATH_NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH_FUNCTIONS
+ if(boost::math::policies::digits<double, boost::math::policies::policy<> >() == boost::math::policies::digits<long double, boost::math::policies::policy<> >())
+ {
+ largest_type = "(long\\s+)?double|real_concept";
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ largest_type = "long double|real_concept";
+ }
+#else
+ largest_type = "(long\\s+)?double";
+#endif
+ //
+ // On MacOS X erfc has much higher error levels than
+ // expected: given that the implementation is basically
+ // just a rational function evaluation combined with
+ // exponentiation, we conclude that exp and pow are less
+ // accurate on this platform, especially when the result
+ // is outside the range of a double.
+ //
+ add_expected_result(
+ ".*", // compiler
+ ".*", // stdlib
+ "Mac OS", // platform
+ largest_type, // test type(s)
+ "Erf Function:.*Large.*", // test data group
+ "erfc", 4300, 1300); // test function
+ add_expected_result(
+ ".*", // compiler
+ ".*", // stdlib
+ "Mac OS", // platform
+ largest_type, // test type(s)
+ "Erf Function:.*", // test data group
+ "erfc", 40, 10); // test function
+
+ add_expected_result(
+ ".*", // compiler
+ ".*", // stdlib
+ ".*", // platform
+ "real_concept", // test type(s)
+ "Erf Function:.*", // test data group
+ "erfc?", 20, 6); // test function
+ add_expected_result(
+ ".*", // compiler
+ ".*", // stdlib
+ ".*", // platform
+ "real_concept", // test type(s)
+ "Inverse Erfc.*", // test data group
+ "erfc_inv", 80, 10); // test function
+
+
+ //
+ // Catch all cases come last:
+ //
+ add_expected_result(
+ ".*", // compiler
+ ".*", // stdlib
+ ".*", // platform
+ ".*", // test type(s)
+ "Erf Function:.*", // test data group
+ "erfc?", 2, 2); // test function
+ add_expected_result(
+ ".*aCC.*", // compiler
+ ".*", // stdlib
+ ".*", // platform
+ ".*", // test type(s)
+ "Inverse Erfc.*", // test data group
+ "erfc_inv", 80, 10); // test function
+ add_expected_result(
+ ".*", // compiler
+ ".*", // stdlib
+ ".*", // platform
+ ".*", // test type(s)
+ "Inverse Erf.*", // test data group
+ "erfc?_inv", 18, 4); // test function
+
+ //
+ // Finish off by printing out the compiler/stdlib/platform names,
+ // we do this to make it easier to mark up expected error rates.
+ //
+ std::cout << "Tests run with " << BOOST_COMPILER << ", "
+ << BOOST_STDLIB << ", " << BOOST_PLATFORM << std::endl;
+}
+
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE( test_main )
+{
+ BOOST_MATH_CONTROL_FP;
+ test_spots(0.0F, "float");
+ test_spots(0.0, "double");
+#ifndef BOOST_MATH_NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH_FUNCTIONS
+ test_spots(0.0L, "long double");
+#if !BOOST_WORKAROUND(__BORLANDC__, BOOST_TESTED_AT(0x582))
+ test_spots(boost::math::concepts::real_concept(0.1), "real_concept");
+#endif
+#endif
+
+ expected_results();
+
+ test_erf(0.1F, "float");
+ test_erf(0.1, "double");
+#ifndef BOOST_MATH_NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH_FUNCTIONS
+ test_erf(0.1L, "long double");
+#ifndef BOOST_MATH_NO_REAL_CONCEPT_TESTS
+#if !BOOST_WORKAROUND(__BORLANDC__, BOOST_TESTED_AT(0x582))
+ test_erf(boost::math::concepts::real_concept(0.1), "real_concept");
+#endif
+#endif
+#else
+ std::cout << "<note>The long double tests have been disabled on this platform "
+ "either because the long double overloads of the usual math functions are "
+ "not available at all, or because they are too inaccurate for these tests "
+ "to pass.</note>" << std::endl;
+#endif
+}
+
+/*
+
+Output:
+
+test_erf.cpp
+Compiling manifest to resources...
+Linking...
+Embedding manifest...
+Autorun "i:\boost-06-05-03-1300\libs\math\test\Math_test\debug\test_erf.exe"
+Running 1 test case...
+Testing basic sanity checks for type float
+Testing basic sanity checks for type double
+Testing basic sanity checks for type long double
+Testing basic sanity checks for type real_concept
+Tests run with Microsoft Visual C++ version 8.0, Dinkumware standard library version 405, Win32
+Testing Erf Function: Small Values with type float
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf<float> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+boost::math::erfc<float> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+Testing Erf Function: Medium Values with type float
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf<float> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+boost::math::erfc<float> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+Testing Erf Function: Large Values with type float
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf<float> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+boost::math::erfc<float> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+Testing Inverse Erf Function with type float
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf_inv<float> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+Testing Inverse Erfc Function with type float
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erfc_inv<float> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+Testing Erf Function: Small Values with type double
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf<double> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+boost::math::erfc<double> Max = 0.7857 RMS Mean=0.06415
+ worst case at row: 149
+ { 0.3343, 0.3636, 0.6364 }
+Testing Erf Function: Medium Values with type double
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf<double> Max = 0.9219 RMS Mean=0.1016
+ worst case at row: 273
+ { 0.5252, 0.5424, 0.4576 }
+boost::math::erfc<double> Max = 1.08 RMS Mean=0.3224
+ worst case at row: 287
+ { 0.8461, 0.7685, 0.2315 }
+Testing Erf Function: Large Values with type double
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf<double> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+boost::math::erfc<double> Max = 1.048 RMS Mean=0.2032
+ worst case at row: 50
+ { 20.96, 1, 4.182e-193 }
+Testing Inverse Erf Function with type double
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf_inv<double> Max = 1.124 RMS Mean=0.5082
+ worst case at row: 98
+ { 0.9881, 1.779 }
+Testing Inverse Erfc Function with type double
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erfc_inv<double> Max = 1.124 RMS Mean=0.5006
+ worst case at row: 98
+ { 1.988, -1.779 }
+Testing Erf Function: Small Values with type long double
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf<long double> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+boost::math::erfc<long double> Max = 0.7857 RMS Mean=0.06415
+ worst case at row: 149
+ { 0.3343, 0.3636, 0.6364 }
+Testing Erf Function: Medium Values with type long double
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf<long double> Max = 0.9219 RMS Mean=0.1016
+ worst case at row: 273
+ { 0.5252, 0.5424, 0.4576 }
+boost::math::erfc<long double> Max = 1.08 RMS Mean=0.3224
+ worst case at row: 287
+ { 0.8461, 0.7685, 0.2315 }
+Testing Erf Function: Large Values with type long double
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf<long double> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+boost::math::erfc<long double> Max = 1.048 RMS Mean=0.2032
+ worst case at row: 50
+ { 20.96, 1, 4.182e-193 }
+Testing Inverse Erf Function with type long double
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf_inv<long double> Max = 1.124 RMS Mean=0.5082
+ worst case at row: 98
+ { 0.9881, 1.779 }
+Testing Inverse Erfc Function with type long double
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erfc_inv<long double> Max = 1.124 RMS Mean=0.5006
+ worst case at row: 98
+ { 1.988, -1.779 }
+Testing Erf Function: Small Values with type real_concept
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf<real_concept> Max = 1.271 RMS Mean=0.5381
+ worst case at row: 144
+ { 0.0109, 0.0123, 0.9877 }
+boost::math::erfc<real_concept> Max = 0.7857 RMS Mean=0.07777
+ worst case at row: 149
+ { 0.3343, 0.3636, 0.6364 }
+Testing Erf Function: Medium Values with type real_concept
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf<real_concept> Max = 22.5 RMS Mean=4.224
+ worst case at row: 233
+ { -0.7852, -0.7332, 1.733 }
+Peak error greater than expected value of 20
+i:/boost-sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/test/handle_test_result.hpp(146): error in "test_main_caller( argc, argv )": check bounds.first >= max_error_found failed
+boost::math::erfc<real_concept> Max = 97.77 RMS Mean=8.373
+ worst case at row: 289
+ { 0.9849, 0.8363, 0.1637 }
+Peak error greater than expected value of 20
+i:/boost-sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/test/handle_test_result.hpp(146): error in "test_main_caller( argc, argv )": check bounds.first >= max_error_found failed
+Mean error greater than expected value of 6
+i:/boost-sandbox/math_toolkit/libs/math/test/handle_test_result.hpp(151): error in "test_main_caller( argc, argv )": check bounds.second >= mean_error_found failed
+Testing Erf Function: Large Values with type real_concept
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf<real_concept> Max = 0 RMS Mean=0
+boost::math::erfc<real_concept> Max = 1.395 RMS Mean=0.2908
+ worst case at row: 11
+ { 10.99, 1, 1.87e-054 }
+Testing Inverse Erf Function with type real_concept
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erf_inv<real_concept> Max = 1.124 RMS Mean=0.5082
+ worst case at row: 98
+ { 0.9881, 1.779 }
+Testing Inverse Erfc Function with type real_concept
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+boost::math::erfc_inv<real_concept> Max = 1.124 RMS Mean=0.5006
+ worst case at row: 98
+ { 1.988, -1.779 }
+Test suite "Test Program" failed with:
+ 181 assertions out of 184 passed
+ 3 assertions out of 184 failed
+ 1 test case out of 1 failed
+ Test case "test_main_caller( argc, argv )" failed with:
+ 181 assertions out of 184 passed
+ 3 assertions out of 184 failed
+Build Time 0:15
+
+*/