diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'third_party/python/mock-1.0.0/html/_sources/examples.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | third_party/python/mock-1.0.0/html/_sources/examples.txt | 1063 |
1 files changed, 1063 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/third_party/python/mock-1.0.0/html/_sources/examples.txt b/third_party/python/mock-1.0.0/html/_sources/examples.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ecb994b156 --- /dev/null +++ b/third_party/python/mock-1.0.0/html/_sources/examples.txt @@ -0,0 +1,1063 @@ +.. _further-examples: + +================== + Further Examples +================== + +.. currentmodule:: mock + +.. testsetup:: + + from datetime import date + + BackendProvider = Mock() + sys.modules['mymodule'] = mymodule = Mock(name='mymodule') + + def grob(val): + "First frob and then clear val" + mymodule.frob(val) + val.clear() + + mymodule.frob = lambda val: val + mymodule.grob = grob + mymodule.date = date + + class TestCase(unittest2.TestCase): + def run(self): + result = unittest2.TestResult() + out = unittest2.TestCase.run(self, result) + assert result.wasSuccessful() + + from mock import inPy3k + + + +For comprehensive examples, see the unit tests included in the full source +distribution. + +Here are some more examples for some slightly more advanced scenarios than in +the :ref:`getting started <getting-started>` guide. + + +Mocking chained calls +===================== + +Mocking chained calls is actually straightforward with mock once you +understand the :attr:`~Mock.return_value` attribute. When a mock is called for +the first time, or you fetch its `return_value` before it has been called, a +new `Mock` is created. + +This means that you can see how the object returned from a call to a mocked +object has been used by interrogating the `return_value` mock: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> mock = Mock() + >>> mock().foo(a=2, b=3) + <Mock name='mock().foo()' id='...'> + >>> mock.return_value.foo.assert_called_with(a=2, b=3) + +From here it is a simple step to configure and then make assertions about +chained calls. Of course another alternative is writing your code in a more +testable way in the first place... + +So, suppose we have some code that looks a little bit like this: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> class Something(object): + ... def __init__(self): + ... self.backend = BackendProvider() + ... def method(self): + ... response = self.backend.get_endpoint('foobar').create_call('spam', 'eggs').start_call() + ... # more code + +Assuming that `BackendProvider` is already well tested, how do we test +`method()`? Specifically, we want to test that the code section `# more +code` uses the response object in the correct way. + +As this chain of calls is made from an instance attribute we can monkey patch +the `backend` attribute on a `Something` instance. In this particular case +we are only interested in the return value from the final call to +`start_call` so we don't have much configuration to do. Let's assume the +object it returns is 'file-like', so we'll ensure that our response object +uses the builtin `file` as its `spec`. + +To do this we create a mock instance as our mock backend and create a mock +response object for it. To set the response as the return value for that final +`start_call` we could do this: + + `mock_backend.get_endpoint.return_value.create_call.return_value.start_call.return_value = mock_response`. + +We can do that in a slightly nicer way using the :meth:`~Mock.configure_mock` +method to directly set the return value for us: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> something = Something() + >>> mock_response = Mock(spec=file) + >>> mock_backend = Mock() + >>> config = {'get_endpoint.return_value.create_call.return_value.start_call.return_value': mock_response} + >>> mock_backend.configure_mock(**config) + +With these we monkey patch the "mock backend" in place and can make the real +call: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> something.backend = mock_backend + >>> something.method() + +Using :attr:`~Mock.mock_calls` we can check the chained call with a single +assert. A chained call is several calls in one line of code, so there will be +several entries in `mock_calls`. We can use :meth:`call.call_list` to create +this list of calls for us: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> chained = call.get_endpoint('foobar').create_call('spam', 'eggs').start_call() + >>> call_list = chained.call_list() + >>> assert mock_backend.mock_calls == call_list + + +Partial mocking +=============== + +In some tests I wanted to mock out a call to `datetime.date.today() +<http://docs.python.org/library/datetime.html#datetime.date.today>`_ to return +a known date, but I didn't want to prevent the code under test from +creating new date objects. Unfortunately `datetime.date` is written in C, and +so I couldn't just monkey-patch out the static `date.today` method. + +I found a simple way of doing this that involved effectively wrapping the date +class with a mock, but passing through calls to the constructor to the real +class (and returning real instances). + +The :func:`patch decorator <patch>` is used here to +mock out the `date` class in the module under test. The :attr:`side_effect` +attribute on the mock date class is then set to a lambda function that returns +a real date. When the mock date class is called a real date will be +constructed and returned by `side_effect`. + +.. doctest:: + + >>> from datetime import date + >>> with patch('mymodule.date') as mock_date: + ... mock_date.today.return_value = date(2010, 10, 8) + ... mock_date.side_effect = lambda *args, **kw: date(*args, **kw) + ... + ... assert mymodule.date.today() == date(2010, 10, 8) + ... assert mymodule.date(2009, 6, 8) == date(2009, 6, 8) + ... + +Note that we don't patch `datetime.date` globally, we patch `date` in the +module that *uses* it. See :ref:`where to patch <where-to-patch>`. + +When `date.today()` is called a known date is returned, but calls to the +`date(...)` constructor still return normal dates. Without this you can find +yourself having to calculate an expected result using exactly the same +algorithm as the code under test, which is a classic testing anti-pattern. + +Calls to the date constructor are recorded in the `mock_date` attributes +(`call_count` and friends) which may also be useful for your tests. + +An alternative way of dealing with mocking dates, or other builtin classes, +is discussed in `this blog entry +<http://williamjohnbert.com/2011/07/how-to-unit-testing-in-django-with-mocking-and-patching/>`_. + + +Mocking a Generator Method +========================== + +A Python generator is a function or method that uses the `yield statement +<http://docs.python.org/reference/simple_stmts.html#the-yield-statement>`_ to +return a series of values when iterated over [#]_. + +A generator method / function is called to return the generator object. It is +the generator object that is then iterated over. The protocol method for +iteration is `__iter__ +<http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html#container.__iter__>`_, so we can +mock this using a `MagicMock`. + +Here's an example class with an "iter" method implemented as a generator: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> class Foo(object): + ... def iter(self): + ... for i in [1, 2, 3]: + ... yield i + ... + >>> foo = Foo() + >>> list(foo.iter()) + [1, 2, 3] + + +How would we mock this class, and in particular its "iter" method? + +To configure the values returned from the iteration (implicit in the call to +`list`), we need to configure the object returned by the call to `foo.iter()`. + +.. doctest:: + + >>> mock_foo = MagicMock() + >>> mock_foo.iter.return_value = iter([1, 2, 3]) + >>> list(mock_foo.iter()) + [1, 2, 3] + +.. [#] There are also generator expressions and more `advanced uses + <http://www.dabeaz.com/coroutines/index.html>`_ of generators, but we aren't + concerned about them here. A very good introduction to generators and how + powerful they are is: `Generator Tricks for Systems Programmers + <http://www.dabeaz.com/generators/>`_. + + +Applying the same patch to every test method +============================================ + +If you want several patches in place for multiple test methods the obvious way +is to apply the patch decorators to every method. This can feel like unnecessary +repetition. For Python 2.6 or more recent you can use `patch` (in all its +various forms) as a class decorator. This applies the patches to all test +methods on the class. A test method is identified by methods whose names start +with `test`: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> @patch('mymodule.SomeClass') + ... class MyTest(TestCase): + ... + ... def test_one(self, MockSomeClass): + ... self.assertTrue(mymodule.SomeClass is MockSomeClass) + ... + ... def test_two(self, MockSomeClass): + ... self.assertTrue(mymodule.SomeClass is MockSomeClass) + ... + ... def not_a_test(self): + ... return 'something' + ... + >>> MyTest('test_one').test_one() + >>> MyTest('test_two').test_two() + >>> MyTest('test_two').not_a_test() + 'something' + +An alternative way of managing patches is to use the :ref:`start-and-stop`. +These allow you to move the patching into your `setUp` and `tearDown` methods. + +.. doctest:: + + >>> class MyTest(TestCase): + ... def setUp(self): + ... self.patcher = patch('mymodule.foo') + ... self.mock_foo = self.patcher.start() + ... + ... def test_foo(self): + ... self.assertTrue(mymodule.foo is self.mock_foo) + ... + ... def tearDown(self): + ... self.patcher.stop() + ... + >>> MyTest('test_foo').run() + +If you use this technique you must ensure that the patching is "undone" by +calling `stop`. This can be fiddlier than you might think, because if an +exception is raised in the setUp then tearDown is not called. `unittest2 +<http://pypi.python.org/pypi/unittest2>`_ cleanup functions make this simpler: + + +.. doctest:: + + >>> class MyTest(TestCase): + ... def setUp(self): + ... patcher = patch('mymodule.foo') + ... self.addCleanup(patcher.stop) + ... self.mock_foo = patcher.start() + ... + ... def test_foo(self): + ... self.assertTrue(mymodule.foo is self.mock_foo) + ... + >>> MyTest('test_foo').run() + + +Mocking Unbound Methods +======================= + +Whilst writing tests today I needed to patch an *unbound method* (patching the +method on the class rather than on the instance). I needed self to be passed +in as the first argument because I want to make asserts about which objects +were calling this particular method. The issue is that you can't patch with a +mock for this, because if you replace an unbound method with a mock it doesn't +become a bound method when fetched from the instance, and so it doesn't get +self passed in. The workaround is to patch the unbound method with a real +function instead. The :func:`patch` decorator makes it so simple to +patch out methods with a mock that having to create a real function becomes a +nuisance. + +If you pass `autospec=True` to patch then it does the patching with a +*real* function object. This function object has the same signature as the one +it is replacing, but delegates to a mock under the hood. You still get your +mock auto-created in exactly the same way as before. What it means though, is +that if you use it to patch out an unbound method on a class the mocked +function will be turned into a bound method if it is fetched from an instance. +It will have `self` passed in as the first argument, which is exactly what I +wanted: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> class Foo(object): + ... def foo(self): + ... pass + ... + >>> with patch.object(Foo, 'foo', autospec=True) as mock_foo: + ... mock_foo.return_value = 'foo' + ... foo = Foo() + ... foo.foo() + ... + 'foo' + >>> mock_foo.assert_called_once_with(foo) + +If we don't use `autospec=True` then the unbound method is patched out +with a Mock instance instead, and isn't called with `self`. + + +Checking multiple calls with mock +================================= + +mock has a nice API for making assertions about how your mock objects are used. + +.. doctest:: + + >>> mock = Mock() + >>> mock.foo_bar.return_value = None + >>> mock.foo_bar('baz', spam='eggs') + >>> mock.foo_bar.assert_called_with('baz', spam='eggs') + +If your mock is only being called once you can use the +:meth:`assert_called_once_with` method that also asserts that the +:attr:`call_count` is one. + +.. doctest:: + + >>> mock.foo_bar.assert_called_once_with('baz', spam='eggs') + >>> mock.foo_bar() + >>> mock.foo_bar.assert_called_once_with('baz', spam='eggs') + Traceback (most recent call last): + ... + AssertionError: Expected to be called once. Called 2 times. + +Both `assert_called_with` and `assert_called_once_with` make assertions about +the *most recent* call. If your mock is going to be called several times, and +you want to make assertions about *all* those calls you can use +:attr:`~Mock.call_args_list`: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> mock = Mock(return_value=None) + >>> mock(1, 2, 3) + >>> mock(4, 5, 6) + >>> mock() + >>> mock.call_args_list + [call(1, 2, 3), call(4, 5, 6), call()] + +The :data:`call` helper makes it easy to make assertions about these calls. You +can build up a list of expected calls and compare it to `call_args_list`. This +looks remarkably similar to the repr of the `call_args_list`: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> expected = [call(1, 2, 3), call(4, 5, 6), call()] + >>> mock.call_args_list == expected + True + + +Coping with mutable arguments +============================= + +Another situation is rare, but can bite you, is when your mock is called with +mutable arguments. `call_args` and `call_args_list` store *references* to the +arguments. If the arguments are mutated by the code under test then you can no +longer make assertions about what the values were when the mock was called. + +Here's some example code that shows the problem. Imagine the following functions +defined in 'mymodule':: + + def frob(val): + pass + + def grob(val): + "First frob and then clear val" + frob(val) + val.clear() + +When we try to test that `grob` calls `frob` with the correct argument look +what happens: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> with patch('mymodule.frob') as mock_frob: + ... val = set([6]) + ... mymodule.grob(val) + ... + >>> val + set([]) + >>> mock_frob.assert_called_with(set([6])) + Traceback (most recent call last): + ... + AssertionError: Expected: ((set([6]),), {}) + Called with: ((set([]),), {}) + +One possibility would be for mock to copy the arguments you pass in. This +could then cause problems if you do assertions that rely on object identity +for equality. + +Here's one solution that uses the :attr:`side_effect` +functionality. If you provide a `side_effect` function for a mock then +`side_effect` will be called with the same args as the mock. This gives us an +opportunity to copy the arguments and store them for later assertions. In this +example I'm using *another* mock to store the arguments so that I can use the +mock methods for doing the assertion. Again a helper function sets this up for +me. + +.. doctest:: + + >>> from copy import deepcopy + >>> from mock import Mock, patch, DEFAULT + >>> def copy_call_args(mock): + ... new_mock = Mock() + ... def side_effect(*args, **kwargs): + ... args = deepcopy(args) + ... kwargs = deepcopy(kwargs) + ... new_mock(*args, **kwargs) + ... return DEFAULT + ... mock.side_effect = side_effect + ... return new_mock + ... + >>> with patch('mymodule.frob') as mock_frob: + ... new_mock = copy_call_args(mock_frob) + ... val = set([6]) + ... mymodule.grob(val) + ... + >>> new_mock.assert_called_with(set([6])) + >>> new_mock.call_args + call(set([6])) + +`copy_call_args` is called with the mock that will be called. It returns a new +mock that we do the assertion on. The `side_effect` function makes a copy of +the args and calls our `new_mock` with the copy. + +.. note:: + + If your mock is only going to be used once there is an easier way of + checking arguments at the point they are called. You can simply do the + checking inside a `side_effect` function. + + .. doctest:: + + >>> def side_effect(arg): + ... assert arg == set([6]) + ... + >>> mock = Mock(side_effect=side_effect) + >>> mock(set([6])) + >>> mock(set()) + Traceback (most recent call last): + ... + AssertionError + +An alternative approach is to create a subclass of `Mock` or `MagicMock` that +copies (using `copy.deepcopy +<http://docs.python.org/library/copy.html#copy.deepcopy>`_) the arguments. +Here's an example implementation: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> from copy import deepcopy + >>> class CopyingMock(MagicMock): + ... def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs): + ... args = deepcopy(args) + ... kwargs = deepcopy(kwargs) + ... return super(CopyingMock, self).__call__(*args, **kwargs) + ... + >>> c = CopyingMock(return_value=None) + >>> arg = set() + >>> c(arg) + >>> arg.add(1) + >>> c.assert_called_with(set()) + >>> c.assert_called_with(arg) + Traceback (most recent call last): + ... + AssertionError: Expected call: mock(set([1])) + Actual call: mock(set([])) + >>> c.foo + <CopyingMock name='mock.foo' id='...'> + +When you subclass `Mock` or `MagicMock` all dynamically created attributes, +and the `return_value` will use your subclass automatically. That means all +children of a `CopyingMock` will also have the type `CopyingMock`. + + +Raising exceptions on attribute access +====================================== + +You can use :class:`PropertyMock` to mimic the behaviour of properties. This +includes raising exceptions when an attribute is accessed. + +Here's an example raising a `ValueError` when the 'foo' attribute is accessed: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> m = MagicMock() + >>> p = PropertyMock(side_effect=ValueError) + >>> type(m).foo = p + >>> m.foo + Traceback (most recent call last): + .... + ValueError + +Because every mock object has its own type, a new subclass of whichever mock +class you're using, all mock objects are isolated from each other. You can +safely attach properties (or other descriptors or whatever you want in fact) +to `type(mock)` without affecting other mock objects. + + +Multiple calls with different effects +===================================== + +.. note:: + + In mock 1.0 the handling of iterable `side_effect` was changed. Any + exceptions in the iterable will be raised instead of returned. + +Handling code that needs to behave differently on subsequent calls during the +test can be tricky. For example you may have a function that needs to raise +an exception the first time it is called but returns a response on the second +call (testing retry behaviour). + +One approach is to use a :attr:`side_effect` function that replaces itself. The +first time it is called the `side_effect` sets a new `side_effect` that will +be used for the second call. It then raises an exception: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> def side_effect(*args): + ... def second_call(*args): + ... return 'response' + ... mock.side_effect = second_call + ... raise Exception('boom') + ... + >>> mock = Mock(side_effect=side_effect) + >>> mock('first') + Traceback (most recent call last): + ... + Exception: boom + >>> mock('second') + 'response' + >>> mock.assert_called_with('second') + +Another perfectly valid way would be to pop return values from a list. If the +return value is an exception, raise it instead of returning it: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> returns = [Exception('boom'), 'response'] + >>> def side_effect(*args): + ... result = returns.pop(0) + ... if isinstance(result, Exception): + ... raise result + ... return result + ... + >>> mock = Mock(side_effect=side_effect) + >>> mock('first') + Traceback (most recent call last): + ... + Exception: boom + >>> mock('second') + 'response' + >>> mock.assert_called_with('second') + +Which approach you prefer is a matter of taste. The first approach is actually +a line shorter but maybe the second approach is more readable. + + +Nesting Patches +=============== + +Using patch as a context manager is nice, but if you do multiple patches you +can end up with nested with statements indenting further and further to the +right: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> class MyTest(TestCase): + ... + ... def test_foo(self): + ... with patch('mymodule.Foo') as mock_foo: + ... with patch('mymodule.Bar') as mock_bar: + ... with patch('mymodule.Spam') as mock_spam: + ... assert mymodule.Foo is mock_foo + ... assert mymodule.Bar is mock_bar + ... assert mymodule.Spam is mock_spam + ... + >>> original = mymodule.Foo + >>> MyTest('test_foo').test_foo() + >>> assert mymodule.Foo is original + +With unittest2_ `cleanup` functions and the :ref:`start-and-stop` we can +achieve the same effect without the nested indentation. A simple helper +method, `create_patch`, puts the patch in place and returns the created mock +for us: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> class MyTest(TestCase): + ... + ... def create_patch(self, name): + ... patcher = patch(name) + ... thing = patcher.start() + ... self.addCleanup(patcher.stop) + ... return thing + ... + ... def test_foo(self): + ... mock_foo = self.create_patch('mymodule.Foo') + ... mock_bar = self.create_patch('mymodule.Bar') + ... mock_spam = self.create_patch('mymodule.Spam') + ... + ... assert mymodule.Foo is mock_foo + ... assert mymodule.Bar is mock_bar + ... assert mymodule.Spam is mock_spam + ... + >>> original = mymodule.Foo + >>> MyTest('test_foo').run() + >>> assert mymodule.Foo is original + + +Mocking a dictionary with MagicMock +=================================== + +You may want to mock a dictionary, or other container object, recording all +access to it whilst having it still behave like a dictionary. + +We can do this with :class:`MagicMock`, which will behave like a dictionary, +and using :data:`~Mock.side_effect` to delegate dictionary access to a real +underlying dictionary that is under our control. + +When the `__getitem__` and `__setitem__` methods of our `MagicMock` are called +(normal dictionary access) then `side_effect` is called with the key (and in +the case of `__setitem__` the value too). We can also control what is returned. + +After the `MagicMock` has been used we can use attributes like +:data:`~Mock.call_args_list` to assert about how the dictionary was used: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> my_dict = {'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'c': 3} + >>> def getitem(name): + ... return my_dict[name] + ... + >>> def setitem(name, val): + ... my_dict[name] = val + ... + >>> mock = MagicMock() + >>> mock.__getitem__.side_effect = getitem + >>> mock.__setitem__.side_effect = setitem + +.. note:: + + An alternative to using `MagicMock` is to use `Mock` and *only* provide + the magic methods you specifically want: + + .. doctest:: + + >>> mock = Mock() + >>> mock.__setitem__ = Mock(side_effect=getitem) + >>> mock.__getitem__ = Mock(side_effect=setitem) + + A *third* option is to use `MagicMock` but passing in `dict` as the `spec` + (or `spec_set`) argument so that the `MagicMock` created only has + dictionary magic methods available: + + .. doctest:: + + >>> mock = MagicMock(spec_set=dict) + >>> mock.__getitem__.side_effect = getitem + >>> mock.__setitem__.side_effect = setitem + +With these side effect functions in place, the `mock` will behave like a normal +dictionary but recording the access. It even raises a `KeyError` if you try +to access a key that doesn't exist. + +.. doctest:: + + >>> mock['a'] + 1 + >>> mock['c'] + 3 + >>> mock['d'] + Traceback (most recent call last): + ... + KeyError: 'd' + >>> mock['b'] = 'fish' + >>> mock['d'] = 'eggs' + >>> mock['b'] + 'fish' + >>> mock['d'] + 'eggs' + +After it has been used you can make assertions about the access using the normal +mock methods and attributes: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> mock.__getitem__.call_args_list + [call('a'), call('c'), call('d'), call('b'), call('d')] + >>> mock.__setitem__.call_args_list + [call('b', 'fish'), call('d', 'eggs')] + >>> my_dict + {'a': 1, 'c': 3, 'b': 'fish', 'd': 'eggs'} + + +Mock subclasses and their attributes +==================================== + +There are various reasons why you might want to subclass `Mock`. One reason +might be to add helper methods. Here's a silly example: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> class MyMock(MagicMock): + ... def has_been_called(self): + ... return self.called + ... + >>> mymock = MyMock(return_value=None) + >>> mymock + <MyMock id='...'> + >>> mymock.has_been_called() + False + >>> mymock() + >>> mymock.has_been_called() + True + +The standard behaviour for `Mock` instances is that attributes and the return +value mocks are of the same type as the mock they are accessed on. This ensures +that `Mock` attributes are `Mocks` and `MagicMock` attributes are `MagicMocks` +[#]_. So if you're subclassing to add helper methods then they'll also be +available on the attributes and return value mock of instances of your +subclass. + +.. doctest:: + + >>> mymock.foo + <MyMock name='mock.foo' id='...'> + >>> mymock.foo.has_been_called() + False + >>> mymock.foo() + <MyMock name='mock.foo()' id='...'> + >>> mymock.foo.has_been_called() + True + +Sometimes this is inconvenient. For example, `one user +<https://code.google.com/p/mock/issues/detail?id=105>`_ is subclassing mock to +created a `Twisted adaptor +<http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/11.0.0/api/twisted.python.components.html>`_. +Having this applied to attributes too actually causes errors. + +`Mock` (in all its flavours) uses a method called `_get_child_mock` to create +these "sub-mocks" for attributes and return values. You can prevent your +subclass being used for attributes by overriding this method. The signature is +that it takes arbitrary keyword arguments (`**kwargs`) which are then passed +onto the mock constructor: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> class Subclass(MagicMock): + ... def _get_child_mock(self, **kwargs): + ... return MagicMock(**kwargs) + ... + >>> mymock = Subclass() + >>> mymock.foo + <MagicMock name='mock.foo' id='...'> + >>> assert isinstance(mymock, Subclass) + >>> assert not isinstance(mymock.foo, Subclass) + >>> assert not isinstance(mymock(), Subclass) + +.. [#] An exception to this rule are the non-callable mocks. Attributes use the + callable variant because otherwise non-callable mocks couldn't have callable + methods. + + +Mocking imports with patch.dict +=============================== + +One situation where mocking can be hard is where you have a local import inside +a function. These are harder to mock because they aren't using an object from +the module namespace that we can patch out. + +Generally local imports are to be avoided. They are sometimes done to prevent +circular dependencies, for which there is *usually* a much better way to solve +the problem (refactor the code) or to prevent "up front costs" by delaying the +import. This can also be solved in better ways than an unconditional local +import (store the module as a class or module attribute and only do the import +on first use). + +That aside there is a way to use `mock` to affect the results of an import. +Importing fetches an *object* from the `sys.modules` dictionary. Note that it +fetches an *object*, which need not be a module. Importing a module for the +first time results in a module object being put in `sys.modules`, so usually +when you import something you get a module back. This need not be the case +however. + +This means you can use :func:`patch.dict` to *temporarily* put a mock in place +in `sys.modules`. Any imports whilst this patch is active will fetch the mock. +When the patch is complete (the decorated function exits, the with statement +body is complete or `patcher.stop()` is called) then whatever was there +previously will be restored safely. + +Here's an example that mocks out the 'fooble' module. + +.. doctest:: + + >>> mock = Mock() + >>> with patch.dict('sys.modules', {'fooble': mock}): + ... import fooble + ... fooble.blob() + ... + <Mock name='mock.blob()' id='...'> + >>> assert 'fooble' not in sys.modules + >>> mock.blob.assert_called_once_with() + +As you can see the `import fooble` succeeds, but on exit there is no 'fooble' +left in `sys.modules`. + +This also works for the `from module import name` form: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> mock = Mock() + >>> with patch.dict('sys.modules', {'fooble': mock}): + ... from fooble import blob + ... blob.blip() + ... + <Mock name='mock.blob.blip()' id='...'> + >>> mock.blob.blip.assert_called_once_with() + +With slightly more work you can also mock package imports: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> mock = Mock() + >>> modules = {'package': mock, 'package.module': mock.module} + >>> with patch.dict('sys.modules', modules): + ... from package.module import fooble + ... fooble() + ... + <Mock name='mock.module.fooble()' id='...'> + >>> mock.module.fooble.assert_called_once_with() + + +Tracking order of calls and less verbose call assertions +======================================================== + +The :class:`Mock` class allows you to track the *order* of method calls on +your mock objects through the :attr:`~Mock.method_calls` attribute. This +doesn't allow you to track the order of calls between separate mock objects, +however we can use :attr:`~Mock.mock_calls` to achieve the same effect. + +Because mocks track calls to child mocks in `mock_calls`, and accessing an +arbitrary attribute of a mock creates a child mock, we can create our separate +mocks from a parent one. Calls to those child mock will then all be recorded, +in order, in the `mock_calls` of the parent: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> manager = Mock() + >>> mock_foo = manager.foo + >>> mock_bar = manager.bar + + >>> mock_foo.something() + <Mock name='mock.foo.something()' id='...'> + >>> mock_bar.other.thing() + <Mock name='mock.bar.other.thing()' id='...'> + + >>> manager.mock_calls + [call.foo.something(), call.bar.other.thing()] + +We can then assert about the calls, including the order, by comparing with +the `mock_calls` attribute on the manager mock: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> expected_calls = [call.foo.something(), call.bar.other.thing()] + >>> manager.mock_calls == expected_calls + True + +If `patch` is creating, and putting in place, your mocks then you can attach +them to a manager mock using the :meth:`~Mock.attach_mock` method. After +attaching calls will be recorded in `mock_calls` of the manager. + +.. doctest:: + + >>> manager = MagicMock() + >>> with patch('mymodule.Class1') as MockClass1: + ... with patch('mymodule.Class2') as MockClass2: + ... manager.attach_mock(MockClass1, 'MockClass1') + ... manager.attach_mock(MockClass2, 'MockClass2') + ... MockClass1().foo() + ... MockClass2().bar() + ... + <MagicMock name='mock.MockClass1().foo()' id='...'> + <MagicMock name='mock.MockClass2().bar()' id='...'> + >>> manager.mock_calls + [call.MockClass1(), + call.MockClass1().foo(), + call.MockClass2(), + call.MockClass2().bar()] + +If many calls have been made, but you're only interested in a particular +sequence of them then an alternative is to use the +:meth:`~Mock.assert_has_calls` method. This takes a list of calls (constructed +with the :data:`call` object). If that sequence of calls are in +:attr:`~Mock.mock_calls` then the assert succeeds. + +.. doctest:: + + >>> m = MagicMock() + >>> m().foo().bar().baz() + <MagicMock name='mock().foo().bar().baz()' id='...'> + >>> m.one().two().three() + <MagicMock name='mock.one().two().three()' id='...'> + >>> calls = call.one().two().three().call_list() + >>> m.assert_has_calls(calls) + +Even though the chained call `m.one().two().three()` aren't the only calls that +have been made to the mock, the assert still succeeds. + +Sometimes a mock may have several calls made to it, and you are only interested +in asserting about *some* of those calls. You may not even care about the +order. In this case you can pass `any_order=True` to `assert_has_calls`: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> m = MagicMock() + >>> m(1), m.two(2, 3), m.seven(7), m.fifty('50') + (...) + >>> calls = [call.fifty('50'), call(1), call.seven(7)] + >>> m.assert_has_calls(calls, any_order=True) + + +More complex argument matching +============================== + +Using the same basic concept as `ANY` we can implement matchers to do more +complex assertions on objects used as arguments to mocks. + +Suppose we expect some object to be passed to a mock that by default +compares equal based on object identity (which is the Python default for user +defined classes). To use :meth:`~Mock.assert_called_with` we would need to pass +in the exact same object. If we are only interested in some of the attributes +of this object then we can create a matcher that will check these attributes +for us. + +You can see in this example how a 'standard' call to `assert_called_with` isn't +sufficient: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> class Foo(object): + ... def __init__(self, a, b): + ... self.a, self.b = a, b + ... + >>> mock = Mock(return_value=None) + >>> mock(Foo(1, 2)) + >>> mock.assert_called_with(Foo(1, 2)) + Traceback (most recent call last): + ... + AssertionError: Expected: call(<__main__.Foo object at 0x...>) + Actual call: call(<__main__.Foo object at 0x...>) + +A comparison function for our `Foo` class might look something like this: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> def compare(self, other): + ... if not type(self) == type(other): + ... return False + ... if self.a != other.a: + ... return False + ... if self.b != other.b: + ... return False + ... return True + ... + +And a matcher object that can use comparison functions like this for its +equality operation would look something like this: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> class Matcher(object): + ... def __init__(self, compare, some_obj): + ... self.compare = compare + ... self.some_obj = some_obj + ... def __eq__(self, other): + ... return self.compare(self.some_obj, other) + ... + +Putting all this together: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> match_foo = Matcher(compare, Foo(1, 2)) + >>> mock.assert_called_with(match_foo) + +The `Matcher` is instantiated with our compare function and the `Foo` object +we want to compare against. In `assert_called_with` the `Matcher` equality +method will be called, which compares the object the mock was called with +against the one we created our matcher with. If they match then +`assert_called_with` passes, and if they don't an `AssertionError` is raised: + +.. doctest:: + + >>> match_wrong = Matcher(compare, Foo(3, 4)) + >>> mock.assert_called_with(match_wrong) + Traceback (most recent call last): + ... + AssertionError: Expected: ((<Matcher object at 0x...>,), {}) + Called with: ((<Foo object at 0x...>,), {}) + +With a bit of tweaking you could have the comparison function raise the +`AssertionError` directly and provide a more useful failure message. + +As of version 1.5, the Python testing library `PyHamcrest +<http://pypi.python.org/pypi/PyHamcrest>`_ provides similar functionality, +that may be useful here, in the form of its equality matcher +(`hamcrest.library.integration.match_equality +<http://packages.python.org/PyHamcrest/integration.html#hamcrest.library.integration.match_equality>`_). + + +Less verbose configuration of mock objects +========================================== + +This recipe, for easier configuration of mock objects, is now part of `Mock`. +See the :meth:`~Mock.configure_mock` method. + + +Matching any argument in assertions +=================================== + +This example is now built in to mock. See :data:`ANY`. + + +Mocking Properties +================== + +This example is now built in to mock. See :class:`PropertyMock`. + + +Mocking open +============ + +This example is now built in to mock. See :func:`mock_open`. + + +Mocks without some attributes +============================= + +This example is now built in to mock. See :ref:`deleting-attributes`. |