diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000 |
commit | 5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744 (patch) | |
tree | a94efe259b9009378be6d90eb30d2b019d95c194 /Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | linux-upstream.tar.xz linux-upstream.zip |
Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst | 91 |
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0aab2b3f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +========================================== +Submitting devicetree (DT) binding patches +========================================== + +I. For patch submitters +======================= + + 0) Normal patch submission rules from Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst + applies. + + 1) The Documentation/ and include/dt-bindings/ portion of the patch should + be a separate patch. The preferred subject prefix for binding patches is:: + + "dt-bindings: <binding dir>: ..." + + The 80 characters of the subject are precious. It is recommended to not + use "Documentation" or "doc" because that is implied. All bindings are + docs. Repeating "binding" again should also be avoided. + + 2) DT binding files are written in DT schema format using json-schema + vocabulary and YAML file format. The DT binding files must pass validation + by running:: + + make dt_binding_check + + See ../writing-schema.rst for more details about schema and tools setup. + + 3) DT binding files should be dual licensed. The preferred license tag is + (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause). + + 4) Submit the entire series to the devicetree mailinglist at + + devicetree@vger.kernel.org + + and Cc: the DT maintainers. Use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to identify + all of the DT maintainers. + + 5) The Documentation/ portion of the patch should come in the series before + the code implementing the binding. + + 6) Any compatible strings used in a chip or board DTS file must be + previously documented in the corresponding DT binding text file + in Documentation/devicetree/bindings. This rule applies even if + the Linux device driver does not yet match on the compatible + string. [ checkpatch will emit warnings if this step is not + followed as of commit bff5da4335256513497cc8c79f9a9d1665e09864 + ("checkpatch: add DT compatible string documentation checks"). ] + + 7) The wildcard "<chip>" may be used in compatible strings, as in + the following example: + + - compatible: Must contain '"nvidia,<chip>-pcie", + "nvidia,tegra20-pcie"' where <chip> is tegra30, tegra132, ... + + As in the above example, the known values of "<chip>" should be + documented if it is used. + + 8) If a documented compatible string is not yet matched by the + driver, the documentation should also include a compatible + string that is matched by the driver (as in the "nvidia,tegra20-pcie" + example above). + + +II. For kernel maintainers +========================== + + 1) If you aren't comfortable reviewing a given binding, reply to it and ask + the devicetree maintainers for guidance. This will help them prioritize + which ones to review and which ones are ok to let go. + + 2) For driver (not subsystem) bindings: If you are comfortable with the + binding, and it hasn't received an Acked-by from the devicetree + maintainers after a few weeks, go ahead and take it. + + Subsystem bindings (anything affecting more than a single device) + then getting a devicetree maintainer to review it is required. + + 3) For a series going though multiple trees, the binding patch should be + kept with the driver using the binding. + +III. Notes +========== + + 0) Please see ...bindings/ABI.txt for details regarding devicetree ABI. + + 1) This document is intended as a general familiarization with the process as + decided at the 2013 Kernel Summit. When in doubt, the current word of the + devicetree maintainers overrules this document. In that situation, a patch + updating this document would be appreciated. |