diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000 |
commit | 5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744 (patch) | |
tree | a94efe259b9009378be6d90eb30d2b019d95c194 /include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | linux-5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744.tar.xz linux-5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744.zip |
Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h')
-rw-r--r-- | include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h | 308 |
1 files changed, 308 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h b/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3ae65e932 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h @@ -0,0 +1,308 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note */ +/* + * FC Transport BSG Interface + * + * Copyright (C) 2008 James Smart, Emulex Corporation + */ + +#ifndef SCSI_BSG_FC_H +#define SCSI_BSG_FC_H + +#include <linux/types.h> + +/* + * This file intended to be included by both kernel and user space + */ + +/* + * FC Transport SGIO v4 BSG Message Support + */ + +/* Default BSG request timeout (in seconds) */ +#define FC_DEFAULT_BSG_TIMEOUT (10 * HZ) + + +/* + * Request Message Codes supported by the FC Transport + */ + +/* define the class masks for the message codes */ +#define FC_BSG_CLS_MASK 0xF0000000 /* find object class */ +#define FC_BSG_HST_MASK 0x80000000 /* fc host class */ +#define FC_BSG_RPT_MASK 0x40000000 /* fc rport class */ + + /* fc_host Message Codes */ +#define FC_BSG_HST_ADD_RPORT (FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x00000001) +#define FC_BSG_HST_DEL_RPORT (FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x00000002) +#define FC_BSG_HST_ELS_NOLOGIN (FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x00000003) +#define FC_BSG_HST_CT (FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x00000004) +#define FC_BSG_HST_VENDOR (FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x000000FF) + + /* fc_rport Message Codes */ +#define FC_BSG_RPT_ELS (FC_BSG_RPT_MASK | 0x00000001) +#define FC_BSG_RPT_CT (FC_BSG_RPT_MASK | 0x00000002) + + + +/* + * FC Address Identifiers in Message Structures : + * + * Whenever a command payload contains a FC Address Identifier + * (aka port_id), the value is effectively in big-endian + * order, thus the array elements are decoded as follows: + * element [0] is bits 23:16 of the FC Address Identifier + * element [1] is bits 15:8 of the FC Address Identifier + * element [2] is bits 7:0 of the FC Address Identifier + */ + + +/* + * FC Host Messages + */ + +/* FC_BSG_HST_ADDR_PORT : */ + +/* Request: + * This message requests the FC host to login to the remote port + * at the specified N_Port_Id. The remote port is to be enumerated + * with the transport upon completion of the login. + */ +struct fc_bsg_host_add_rport { + __u8 reserved; + + /* FC Address Identier of the remote port to login to */ + __u8 port_id[3]; +}; + +/* Response: + * There is no additional response data - fc_bsg_reply->result is sufficient + */ + + +/* FC_BSG_HST_DEL_RPORT : */ + +/* Request: + * This message requests the FC host to remove an enumerated + * remote port and to terminate the login to it. + * + * Note: The driver is free to reject this request if it desires to + * remain logged in with the remote port. + */ +struct fc_bsg_host_del_rport { + __u8 reserved; + + /* FC Address Identier of the remote port to logout of */ + __u8 port_id[3]; +}; + +/* Response: + * There is no additional response data - fc_bsg_reply->result is sufficient + */ + + +/* FC_BSG_HST_ELS_NOLOGIN : */ + +/* Request: + * This message requests the FC_Host to send an ELS to a specific + * N_Port_ID. The host does not need to log into the remote port, + * nor does it need to enumerate the rport for further traffic + * (although, the FC host is free to do so if it desires). + */ +struct fc_bsg_host_els { + /* + * ELS Command Code being sent (must be the same as byte 0 + * of the payload) + */ + __u8 command_code; + + /* FC Address Identier of the remote port to send the ELS to */ + __u8 port_id[3]; +}; + +/* Response: + */ +/* fc_bsg_ctels_reply->status values */ +#define FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK 0x00000000 +#define FC_CTELS_STATUS_REJECT 0x00000001 +#define FC_CTELS_STATUS_P_RJT 0x00000002 +#define FC_CTELS_STATUS_F_RJT 0x00000003 +#define FC_CTELS_STATUS_P_BSY 0x00000004 +#define FC_CTELS_STATUS_F_BSY 0x00000006 +struct fc_bsg_ctels_reply { + /* + * Note: An ELS LS_RJT may be reported in 2 ways: + * a) A status of FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK is returned. The caller + * is to look into the ELS receive payload to determine + * LS_ACC or LS_RJT (by contents of word 0). The reject + * data will be in word 1. + * b) A status of FC_CTELS_STATUS_REJECT is returned, The + * rjt_data field will contain valid data. + * + * Note: ELS LS_ACC is determined by an FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK, and + * the receive payload word 0 indicates LS_ACC + * (e.g. value is 0x02xxxxxx). + * + * Note: Similarly, a CT Reject may be reported in 2 ways: + * a) A status of FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK is returned. The caller + * is to look into the CT receive payload to determine + * Accept or Reject (by contents of word 2). The reject + * data will be in word 3. + * b) A status of FC_CTELS_STATUS_REJECT is returned, The + * rjt_data field will contain valid data. + * + * Note: x_RJT/BSY status will indicae that the rjt_data field + * is valid and contains the reason/explanation values. + */ + __u32 status; /* See FC_CTELS_STATUS_xxx */ + + /* valid if status is not FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK */ + struct { + __u8 action; /* fragment_id for CT REJECT */ + __u8 reason_code; + __u8 reason_explanation; + __u8 vendor_unique; + } rjt_data; +}; + + +/* FC_BSG_HST_CT : */ + +/* Request: + * This message requests that a CT Request be performed with the + * indicated N_Port_ID. The driver is responsible for logging in with + * the fabric and/or N_Port_ID, etc as per FC rules. This request does + * not mandate that the driver must enumerate the destination in the + * transport. The driver is allowed to decide whether to enumerate it, + * and whether to tear it down after the request. + */ +struct fc_bsg_host_ct { + __u8 reserved; + + /* FC Address Identier of the remote port to send the ELS to */ + __u8 port_id[3]; + + /* + * We need words 0-2 of the generic preamble for the LLD's + */ + __u32 preamble_word0; /* revision & IN_ID */ + __u32 preamble_word1; /* GS_Type, GS_SubType, Options, Rsvd */ + __u32 preamble_word2; /* Cmd Code, Max Size */ + +}; +/* Response: + * + * The reply structure is an fc_bsg_ctels_reply structure + */ + + +/* FC_BSG_HST_VENDOR : */ + +/* Request: + * Note: When specifying vendor_id, be sure to read the Vendor Type and ID + * formatting requirements specified in scsi_netlink.h + */ +struct fc_bsg_host_vendor { + /* + * Identifies the vendor that the message is formatted for. This + * should be the recipient of the message. + */ + __u64 vendor_id; + + /* start of vendor command area */ + __u32 vendor_cmd[0]; +}; + +/* Response: + */ +struct fc_bsg_host_vendor_reply { + /* start of vendor response area */ + __u32 vendor_rsp[0]; +}; + + + +/* + * FC Remote Port Messages + */ + +/* FC_BSG_RPT_ELS : */ + +/* Request: + * This message requests that an ELS be performed with the rport. + */ +struct fc_bsg_rport_els { + /* + * ELS Command Code being sent (must be the same as + * byte 0 of the payload) + */ + __u8 els_code; +}; + +/* Response: + * + * The reply structure is an fc_bsg_ctels_reply structure + */ + + +/* FC_BSG_RPT_CT : */ + +/* Request: + * This message requests that a CT Request be performed with the rport. + */ +struct fc_bsg_rport_ct { + /* + * We need words 0-2 of the generic preamble for the LLD's + */ + __u32 preamble_word0; /* revision & IN_ID */ + __u32 preamble_word1; /* GS_Type, GS_SubType, Options, Rsvd */ + __u32 preamble_word2; /* Cmd Code, Max Size */ +}; +/* Response: + * + * The reply structure is an fc_bsg_ctels_reply structure + */ + + + + +/* request (CDB) structure of the sg_io_v4 */ +struct fc_bsg_request { + __u32 msgcode; + union { + struct fc_bsg_host_add_rport h_addrport; + struct fc_bsg_host_del_rport h_delrport; + struct fc_bsg_host_els h_els; + struct fc_bsg_host_ct h_ct; + struct fc_bsg_host_vendor h_vendor; + + struct fc_bsg_rport_els r_els; + struct fc_bsg_rport_ct r_ct; + } rqst_data; +} __attribute__((packed)); + + +/* response (request sense data) structure of the sg_io_v4 */ +struct fc_bsg_reply { + /* + * The completion result. Result exists in two forms: + * if negative, it is an -Exxx system errno value. There will + * be no further reply information supplied. + * else, it's the 4-byte scsi error result, with driver, host, + * msg and status fields. The per-msgcode reply structure + * will contain valid data. + */ + __u32 result; + + /* If there was reply_payload, how much was recevied ? */ + __u32 reply_payload_rcv_len; + + union { + struct fc_bsg_host_vendor_reply vendor_reply; + + struct fc_bsg_ctels_reply ctels_reply; + } reply_data; +}; + + +#endif /* SCSI_BSG_FC_H */ + |